Re: [asterisk-users] Zaptel Compatibility
Mik Cheez wrote: Hmph...and it appears no kernel-smp-source exists. You should be able to compile going to a non-SMP kernel, but there must be a better solution. I can't believe this hasn't come up before. Sorry. You only need the kernel headers in reality I believe. Why not just mail RH and ask them for the headers? Al -- The way out is open! http://www.theopensourcerer.com ___ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] Zaptel Compatibility
.build file is missing in the kernel-source package. Solutions is: Once you have the appropriate kernel sources installed you will need to configure them. Execute the following commands: cd /lib/modules/`uname -r`/build make mrproper Execute one of the following commands based on your hardware configuration (again, the exact file names may vary): cp -f configs/kernel-2.4.2-i586.config arch/i386/defconfig cp -f configs/kernel-2.4.2-i586-smp.config arch/i386/defconfig cp -f configs/kernel-2.4.2-i686-enterprise.config arch/i386/defconfig Verify that the kernel Makefile EXTRAVERSION information matches the version that you are running with respect to smp support. make oldconfig make dep Similar to 'make cloneconfig' in SuSE Linux. On Thu, May 1, 2008 at 3:06 AM, Alan Lord [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Mik Cheez wrote: Hmph...and it appears no kernel-smp-source exists. You should be able to compile going to a non-SMP kernel, but there must be a better solution. I can't believe this hasn't come up before. Sorry. You only need the kernel headers in reality I believe. Why not just mail RH and ask them for the headers? Al -- The way out is open! http://www.theopensourcerer.com ___ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] Zaptel Compatibility
On Wed, Apr 30, 2008 at 08:05:20PM -0400, Andreas van dem Helge wrote: On Wed, Apr 30, 2008 at 4:57 PM, Tzafrir Cohen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Wed, Apr 30, 2008 at 09:21:37PM +0300, Tzafrir Cohen wrote: On Wed, Apr 30, 2008 at 02:00:57PM -0400, Andreas van dem Helge wrote: Is Zaptel 1.4.10 compatible with RHEL 3 (2.4.21-53.ELsmp)? Because I can compile 1.2.20.1 just fine but 1.4 says: echo You do not appear to have the sources for the 2.4.21-53.ELsmp kernel installed. You do not appear to have the sources for the 2.4.21-53.ELsmp kernel installed. exit 1 make[1]: *** [modules] Error 1 make[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/zaptel-1.4.10' make: *** [all] Error 2 Yes kernel-source is installed, there is no kernel-devel. I read one account where if I use non-SMP kernel it might work. But there's no fun it that. 1.2 works why not 1.4? Failing getting 1.4 to work can I use Zaptel 1.2 with Asterisk 1.4? I think not but just wanted to make sure. Zaptel will look as the kernel source for (in this specific order) 1. Whatever you explicitly set in KSRC (if you did) 2. /lib/modules/$KVERS/build (if you set KVERS explicitly) 3. /lib/modules/`uname -r`/build 4. /usr/src/linux-2.4 5. /usr/src/linux 'build' in (2) and (3) is normally a symlink to the path of the kernel. I forgot to mention that there's an additional test done: the source directory found (KSRC) has to have a file called .config in it . Which is the first of those directories that you actually have? To better debug this, edit the Makefile. Find the line with that error message and add the word '$(KSRC)' (without quotes) to it. This should help you see what the makefile thought is the kernel source tree. /lib/modules/2.4.21-53.ELsmp/build [EMAIL PROTECTED] [/]# ll /lib/modules/2.4.21-53.ELsmp/build lrwxrwxrwx1 root root 35 Apr 30 04:48 /lib/modules/2.4.21-53.ELsmp/build - ../../../usr/src/linux-2.4.21-53.EL/ There's something wrong with this system usr/src/linux-2.4.21-53.EL/.build is missing and I get errors trying to do 'make cloneconfig' .build ? What .build? I wrote .config above. (A nice example for whoever wants to demonstrate the damage from top posting) If that directory has no .config file, then it is not a configured kernel source directory. If indeed there isn't such a file, You need to figure out where you have a matching kernel tree for your kernel. -- Tzafrir Cohen icq#16849755 jabber:[EMAIL PROTECTED] +972-50-7952406 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.xorcom.com iax:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/tzafrir ___ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] Zaptel Compatibility
On Thu, May 01, 2008 at 11:59:01AM -0400, Andreas van dem Helge wrote: .build file is missing in the kernel-source package. Solutions is: Once you have the appropriate kernel sources installed you will need to configure them. Execute the following commands: cd /lib/modules/`uname -r`/build make mrproper Which deletes the .config file. Great idea. Execute one of the following commands based on your hardware configuration (again, the exact file names may vary): cp -f configs/kernel-2.4.2-i586.config arch/i386/defconfig cp -f configs/kernel-2.4.2-i586-smp.config arch/i386/defconfig cp -f configs/kernel-2.4.2-i686-enterprise.config arch/i386/defconfig Which one, exactly? Verify that the kernel Makefile EXTRAVERSION information matches the version that you are running with respect to smp support. make oldconfig make dep Similar to 'make cloneconfig' in SuSE Linux. On Thu, May 1, 2008 at 3:06 AM, Alan Lord [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Mik Cheez wrote: Hmph...and it appears no kernel-smp-source exists. You should be able to compile going to a non-SMP kernel, but there must be a better solution. I can't believe this hasn't come up before. Sorry. You only need the kernel headers in reality I believe. Why not just mail RH and ask them for the headers? Al -- The way out is open! http://www.theopensourcerer.com ___ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users -- Tzafrir Cohen icq#16849755 jabber:[EMAIL PROTECTED] +972-50-7952406 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.xorcom.com iax:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/tzafrir ___ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] Zaptel Compatibility
On Wed, Apr 30, 2008 at 02:00:57PM -0400, Andreas van dem Helge wrote: Is Zaptel 1.4.10 compatible with RHEL 3 (2.4.21-53.ELsmp)? Because I can compile 1.2.20.1 just fine but 1.4 says: echo You do not appear to have the sources for the 2.4.21-53.ELsmp kernel installed. You do not appear to have the sources for the 2.4.21-53.ELsmp kernel installed. exit 1 make[1]: *** [modules] Error 1 make[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/zaptel-1.4.10' make: *** [all] Error 2 Yes kernel-source is installed, there is no kernel-devel. I read one account where if I use non-SMP kernel it might work. But there's no fun it that. 1.2 works why not 1.4? Failing getting 1.4 to work can I use Zaptel 1.2 with Asterisk 1.4? I think not but just wanted to make sure. Zaptel will look as the kernel source for (in this specific order) 1. Whatever you explicitly set in KSRC (if you did) 2. /lib/modules/$KVERS/build (if you set KVERS explicitly) 3. /lib/modules/`uname -r`/build 4. /usr/src/linux-2.4 5. /usr/src/linux 'build' in (2) and (3) is normally a symlink to the path of the kernel. -- Tzafrir Cohen icq#16849755 jabber:[EMAIL PROTECTED] +972-50-7952406 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.xorcom.com iax:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/tzafrir ___ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] Zaptel Compatibility
Have you tried kernel-smp-devel? Andreas van dem Helge wrote: Is Zaptel 1.4.10 compatible with RHEL 3 (2.4.21-53.ELsmp)? Because I can compile 1.2.20.1 just fine but 1.4 says: echo You do not appear to have the sources for the 2.4.21-53.ELsmp kernel installed. You do not appear to have the sources for the 2.4.21-53.ELsmp kernel installed. exit 1 make[1]: *** [modules] Error 1 make[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/zaptel-1.4.10' make: *** [all] Error 2 Yes kernel-source is installed, there is no kernel-devel. I read one account where if I use non-SMP kernel it might work. But there's no fun it that. 1.2 works why not 1.4? Failing getting 1.4 to work can I use Zaptel 1.2 with Asterisk 1.4? I think not but just wanted to make sure. ___ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] Zaptel Compatibility
No such thing. [EMAIL PROTECTED] [/usr/src/zaptel-1.4.10]# up2date --showall | grep kernel kernel-2.4.21-53.EL.athlon kernel-2.4.21-53.EL.i686 kernel-BOOT-2.4.21-53.EL.i386 kernel-doc-2.4.21-53.EL.i386 kernel-hugemem-2.4.21-53.EL.i686 kernel-hugemem-unsupported-2.4.21-53.EL.i686 kernel-pcmcia-cs-3.1.31-19.i386 kernel-smp-2.4.21-53.EL.athlon kernel-smp-2.4.21-53.EL.i686 kernel-smp-unsupported-2.4.21-53.EL.athlon kernel-smp-unsupported-2.4.21-53.EL.i686 kernel-source-2.4.21-53.EL.i386 kernel-unsupported-2.4.21-53.EL.athlon kernel-unsupported-2.4.21-53.EL.i686 kernel-utils-2.4-8.37.15.i386 On Wed, Apr 30, 2008 at 2:47 PM, Mik Cheez [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Have you tried kernel-smp-devel? Andreas van dem Helge wrote: Is Zaptel 1.4.10 compatible with RHEL 3 (2.4.21-53.ELsmp)? Because I can compile 1.2.20.1 just fine but 1.4 says: echo You do not appear to have the sources for the 2.4.21-53.ELsmp kernel installed. You do not appear to have the sources for the 2.4.21-53.ELsmp kernel installed. exit 1 make[1]: *** [modules] Error 1 make[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/zaptel-1.4.10' make: *** [all] Error 2 Yes kernel-source is installed, there is no kernel-devel. I read one account where if I use non-SMP kernel it might work. But there's no fun it that. 1.2 works why not 1.4? Failing getting 1.4 to work can I use Zaptel 1.2 with Asterisk 1.4? I think not but just wanted to make sure. ___ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] Zaptel Compatibility
Hmph...and it appears no kernel-smp-source exists. You should be able to compile going to a non-SMP kernel, but there must be a better solution. I can't believe this hasn't come up before. Sorry. Andreas van dem Helge wrote: No such thing. [EMAIL PROTECTED] [/usr/src/zaptel-1.4.10]# up2date --showall | grep kernel kernel-2.4.21-53.EL.athlon kernel-2.4.21-53.EL.i686 kernel-BOOT-2.4.21-53.EL.i386 kernel-doc-2.4.21-53.EL.i386 kernel-hugemem-2.4.21-53.EL.i686 kernel-hugemem-unsupported-2.4.21-53.EL.i686 kernel-pcmcia-cs-3.1.31-19.i386 kernel-smp-2.4.21-53.EL.athlon kernel-smp-2.4.21-53.EL.i686 kernel-smp-unsupported-2.4.21-53.EL.athlon kernel-smp-unsupported-2.4.21-53.EL.i686 kernel-source-2.4.21-53.EL.i386 kernel-unsupported-2.4.21-53.EL.athlon kernel-unsupported-2.4.21-53.EL.i686 kernel-utils-2.4-8.37.15.i386 On Wed, Apr 30, 2008 at 2:47 PM, Mik Cheez [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Have you tried kernel-smp-devel? Andreas van dem Helge wrote: Is Zaptel 1.4.10 compatible with RHEL 3 (2.4.21-53.ELsmp)? Because I can compile 1.2.20.1 just fine but 1.4 says: echo You do not appear to have the sources for the 2.4.21-53.ELsmp kernel installed. You do not appear to have the sources for the 2.4.21-53.ELsmp kernel installed. exit 1 make[1]: *** [modules] Error 1 make[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/zaptel-1.4.10' make: *** [all] Error 2 Yes kernel-source is installed, there is no kernel-devel. I read one account where if I use non-SMP kernel it might work. But there's no fun it that. 1.2 works why not 1.4? Failing getting 1.4 to work can I use Zaptel 1.2 with Asterisk 1.4? I think not but just wanted to make sure. ___ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] Zaptel Compatibility
Zaptel 1.4.10 has bugs or so I have heard. Thanks, Steve Totaro On Wed, Apr 30, 2008 at 3:59 PM, Mik Cheez [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hmph...and it appears no kernel-smp-source exists. You should be able to compile going to a non-SMP kernel, but there must be a better solution. I can't believe this hasn't come up before. Sorry. Andreas van dem Helge wrote: No such thing. [EMAIL PROTECTED] [/usr/src/zaptel-1.4.10]# up2date --showall | grep kernel kernel-2.4.21-53.EL.athlon kernel-2.4.21-53.EL.i686 kernel-BOOT-2.4.21-53.EL.i386 kernel-doc-2.4.21-53.EL.i386 kernel-hugemem-2.4.21-53.EL.i686 kernel-hugemem-unsupported-2.4.21-53.EL.i686 kernel-pcmcia-cs-3.1.31-19.i386 kernel-smp-2.4.21-53.EL.athlon kernel-smp-2.4.21-53.EL.i686 kernel-smp-unsupported-2.4.21-53.EL.athlon kernel-smp-unsupported-2.4.21-53.EL.i686 kernel-source-2.4.21-53.EL.i386 kernel-unsupported-2.4.21-53.EL.athlon kernel-unsupported-2.4.21-53.EL.i686 kernel-utils-2.4-8.37.15.i386 On Wed, Apr 30, 2008 at 2:47 PM, Mik Cheez [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Have you tried kernel-smp-devel? Andreas van dem Helge wrote: Is Zaptel 1.4.10 compatible with RHEL 3 (2.4.21-53.ELsmp)? Because I can compile 1.2.20.1 just fine but 1.4 says: echo You do not appear to have the sources for the 2.4.21-53.ELsmp kernel installed. You do not appear to have the sources for the 2.4.21-53.ELsmp kernel installed. exit 1 make[1]: *** [modules] Error 1 make[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/zaptel-1.4.10' make: *** [all] Error 2 Yes kernel-source is installed, there is no kernel-devel. I read one account where if I use non-SMP kernel it might work. But there's no fun it that. 1.2 works why not 1.4? Failing getting 1.4 to work can I use Zaptel 1.2 with Asterisk 1.4? I think not but just wanted to make sure. ___ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] Zaptel Compatibility
On Wed, Apr 30, 2008 at 09:21:37PM +0300, Tzafrir Cohen wrote: On Wed, Apr 30, 2008 at 02:00:57PM -0400, Andreas van dem Helge wrote: Is Zaptel 1.4.10 compatible with RHEL 3 (2.4.21-53.ELsmp)? Because I can compile 1.2.20.1 just fine but 1.4 says: echo You do not appear to have the sources for the 2.4.21-53.ELsmp kernel installed. You do not appear to have the sources for the 2.4.21-53.ELsmp kernel installed. exit 1 make[1]: *** [modules] Error 1 make[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/zaptel-1.4.10' make: *** [all] Error 2 Yes kernel-source is installed, there is no kernel-devel. I read one account where if I use non-SMP kernel it might work. But there's no fun it that. 1.2 works why not 1.4? Failing getting 1.4 to work can I use Zaptel 1.2 with Asterisk 1.4? I think not but just wanted to make sure. Zaptel will look as the kernel source for (in this specific order) 1. Whatever you explicitly set in KSRC (if you did) 2. /lib/modules/$KVERS/build (if you set KVERS explicitly) 3. /lib/modules/`uname -r`/build 4. /usr/src/linux-2.4 5. /usr/src/linux 'build' in (2) and (3) is normally a symlink to the path of the kernel. I forgot to mention that there's an additional test done: the source directory found (KSRC) has to have a file called .config in it . Which is the first of those directories that you actually have? To better debug this, edit the Makefile. Find the line with that error message and add the word '$(KSRC)' (without quotes) to it. This should help you see what the makefile thought is the kernel source tree. -- Tzafrir Cohen icq#16849755 jabber:[EMAIL PROTECTED] +972-50-7952406 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.xorcom.com iax:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/tzafrir ___ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] Zaptel Compatibility
/lib/modules/2.4.21-53.ELsmp/build [EMAIL PROTECTED] [/]# ll /lib/modules/2.4.21-53.ELsmp/build lrwxrwxrwx1 root root 35 Apr 30 04:48 /lib/modules/2.4.21-53.ELsmp/build - ../../../usr/src/linux-2.4.21-53.EL/ There's something wrong with this system usr/src/linux-2.4.21-53.EL/.build is missing and I get errors trying to do 'make cloneconfig' On Wed, Apr 30, 2008 at 4:57 PM, Tzafrir Cohen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Wed, Apr 30, 2008 at 09:21:37PM +0300, Tzafrir Cohen wrote: On Wed, Apr 30, 2008 at 02:00:57PM -0400, Andreas van dem Helge wrote: Is Zaptel 1.4.10 compatible with RHEL 3 (2.4.21-53.ELsmp)? Because I can compile 1.2.20.1 just fine but 1.4 says: echo You do not appear to have the sources for the 2.4.21-53.ELsmp kernel installed. You do not appear to have the sources for the 2.4.21-53.ELsmp kernel installed. exit 1 make[1]: *** [modules] Error 1 make[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/zaptel-1.4.10' make: *** [all] Error 2 Yes kernel-source is installed, there is no kernel-devel. I read one account where if I use non-SMP kernel it might work. But there's no fun it that. 1.2 works why not 1.4? Failing getting 1.4 to work can I use Zaptel 1.2 with Asterisk 1.4? I think not but just wanted to make sure. Zaptel will look as the kernel source for (in this specific order) 1. Whatever you explicitly set in KSRC (if you did) 2. /lib/modules/$KVERS/build (if you set KVERS explicitly) 3. /lib/modules/`uname -r`/build 4. /usr/src/linux-2.4 5. /usr/src/linux 'build' in (2) and (3) is normally a symlink to the path of the kernel. I forgot to mention that there's an additional test done: the source directory found (KSRC) has to have a file called .config in it . Which is the first of those directories that you actually have? To better debug this, edit the Makefile. Find the line with that error message and add the word '$(KSRC)' (without quotes) to it. This should help you see what the makefile thought is the kernel source tree. -- Tzafrir Cohen icq#16849755 jabber:[EMAIL PROTECTED] +972-50-7952406 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.xorcom.com iax:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/tzafrir ___ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
