Re: [ath9k-devel] [RFT] ath9k_htc - please test new images

2013-02-23 Thread Oleksij Rempel
Am 22.02.2013 20:33, schrieb Adrian Chadd:
 Hi all,

 I have a couple of new test images for ath9k_htc users to test.

 http://developer.atheros.com/~adrian/htc/20130222/

 These images are built by the open source tensilica toolchain rather
 than the proprietary toolchain.

 Their version id has been bumped from 1.3 to 1.4.

 I'd appreciate any testing people can do.

 Thanks!

Hi Adrian,

current driver has this check:
htc_drv_init.c: priv-fw_version_minor != MINOR_VERSION_REQ) {
htc_drv_init.c: MAJOR_VERSION_REQ, MINOR_VERSION_REQ);

so it wont accept 1.4. Currently i compiling kernel without this 
restriction. Then i'll be able to test it.

-- 
Regards,
Oleksij
___
ath9k-devel mailing list
ath9k-devel@lists.ath9k.org
https://lists.ath9k.org/mailman/listinfo/ath9k-devel


Re: [ath9k-devel] [RFT] ath9k_htc - please test new images

2013-02-23 Thread Adrian Chadd
On 23 February 2013 01:54, Oleksij Rempel bug-tr...@fisher-privat.net wrote:

 Hi Adrian,

 current driver has this check:
 htc_drv_init.c: priv-fw_version_minor != MINOR_VERSION_REQ) {
 htc_drv_init.c: MAJOR_VERSION_REQ, MINOR_VERSION_REQ);

 so it wont accept 1.4. Currently i compiling kernel without this
 restriction. Then i'll be able to test it.

Oops! Guess I shouldn't have bumped the version numbers :-)

Thanks,



Adrian
___
ath9k-devel mailing list
ath9k-devel@lists.ath9k.org
https://lists.ath9k.org/mailman/listinfo/ath9k-devel


Re: [ath9k-devel] [RFT] ath9k_htc - please test new images

2013-02-23 Thread Oleksij Rempel
Am 23.02.2013 12:41, schrieb Adrian Chadd:
 On 23 February 2013 01:54, Oleksij Rempel bug-tr...@fisher-privat.net wrote:

 Hi Adrian,

 current driver has this check:
 htc_drv_init.c: priv-fw_version_minor != MINOR_VERSION_REQ) {
 htc_drv_init.c: MAJOR_VERSION_REQ, MINOR_VERSION_REQ);

 so it wont accept 1.4. Currently i compiling kernel without this
 restriction. Then i'll be able to test it.

 Oops! Guess I shouldn't have bumped the version numbers :-)

Now results:
- Current wireless-testing.git is broken for my htc_* devices. none of 
firmwares is working.
- I use 3.8.0-rc7 from wireless-testing.git for testing.
- htc_7010.fw is working.
- htc_9271.fw do not working. it fails on authentication:

[32305.187783] usb 3-2: Product: UB91C
[32305.187789] usb 3-2: Manufacturer: ATHEROS
[32305.187794] usb 3-2: SerialNumber: 12345
[32305.262708] usb 3-2: ath9k_htc: Firmware htc_9271.fw requested
[32305.263302] usbcore: registered new interface driver ath9k_htc
[32305.526943] usb 3-2: ath9k_htc: Transferred FW: htc_9271.fw, size: 48820
[32305.763378] ath9k_htc 3-2:1.0: ath9k_htc: HTC initialized with 33 credits
[32306.076930] ath9k_htc 3-2:1.0: ath9k_htc: FW Version: 1.4
[32306.076939] ath: EEPROM regdomain: 0x0
[32306.076943] ath: EEPROM indicates default country code should be used
[32306.076946] ath: doing EEPROM country-regdmn map search
[32306.076950] ath: country maps to regdmn code: 0x3a
[32306.076954] ath: Country alpha2 being used: US
[32306.076957] ath: Regpair used: 0x3a
[32306.088331] ieee80211 phy6: Atheros AR9271 Rev:1
[32306.573836] IPv6: ADDRCONF(NETDEV_UP): wlan2: link is not ready
[32309.755882] wlan2: authenticate with 74:31:70:62:d3:cf
[32310.183668] wlan2: send auth to 74:31:70:62:d3:cf (try 1/3)
[32310.185673] wlan2: authenticated
[32310.187193] wlan2: associate with 74:31:70:62:d3:cf (try 1/3)
[32310.190965] wlan2: RX AssocResp from 74:31:70:62:d3:cf (capab=0x411 
status=0 aid=4)
[32310.224419] wlan2: associated
[32310.224448] IPv6: ADDRCONF(NETDEV_CHANGE): wlan2: link becomes ready
[32320.218444] wlan2: disassociating from 74:31:70:62:d3:cf by local 
choice (reason=3)
[32320.692076] wlan2: deauthenticating from 74:31:70:62:d3:cf by local 
choice (reason=3)

-- 
Regards,
Oleksij
___
ath9k-devel mailing list
ath9k-devel@lists.ath9k.org
https://lists.ath9k.org/mailman/listinfo/ath9k-devel


Re: [ath9k-devel] [RFT] ath9k_htc - please test new images

2013-02-23 Thread Felix Fietkau
On 2013-02-23 9:13 PM, Oleksij Rempel wrote:
 Am 23.02.2013 12:41, schrieb Adrian Chadd:
 On 23 February 2013 01:54, Oleksij Rempel bug-tr...@fisher-privat.net 
 wrote:

 Hi Adrian,

 current driver has this check:
 htc_drv_init.c: priv-fw_version_minor != MINOR_VERSION_REQ) {
 htc_drv_init.c: MAJOR_VERSION_REQ, MINOR_VERSION_REQ);

 so it wont accept 1.4. Currently i compiling kernel without this
 restriction. Then i'll be able to test it.

 Oops! Guess I shouldn't have bumped the version numbers :-)
 
 Now results:
 - Current wireless-testing.git is broken for my htc_* devices. none of 
 firmwares is working.
 - I use 3.8.0-rc7 from wireless-testing.git for testing.
 - htc_7010.fw is working.
 - htc_9271.fw do not working. it fails on authentication:
Same here (AR9271).

- Felix

___
ath9k-devel mailing list
ath9k-devel@lists.ath9k.org
https://lists.ath9k.org/mailman/listinfo/ath9k-devel


Re: [ath9k-devel] [RFT] ath9k_htc - please test new images

2013-02-23 Thread Adrian Chadd
On 23 February 2013 12:47, Felix Fietkau n...@openwrt.org wrote:

 - I use 3.8.0-rc7 from wireless-testing.git for testing.
 - htc_7010.fw is working.
 - htc_9271.fw do not working. it fails on authentication:
 Same here (AR9271).

Right. http://developer.atheros.com/~adrian/htc/ has another snapshot
from november 2012 - would you mind checking if that firmware works on
the AR9271, same driver?
(but with the revision changed back, obviously.)

Thanks,


Adrian
___
ath9k-devel mailing list
ath9k-devel@lists.ath9k.org
https://lists.ath9k.org/mailman/listinfo/ath9k-devel


Re: [ath9k-devel] [RFT] ath9k_htc - please test new images

2013-02-23 Thread Oleksij Rempel
Am 23.02.2013 22:05, schrieb Adrian Chadd:
 On 23 February 2013 12:47, Felix Fietkau n...@openwrt.org wrote:

 - I use 3.8.0-rc7 from wireless-testing.git for testing.
 - htc_7010.fw is working.
 - htc_9271.fw do not working. it fails on authentication:
 Same here (AR9271).

 Right. http://developer.atheros.com/~adrian/htc/ has another snapshot
 from november 2012 - would you mind checking if that firmware works on
 the AR9271, same driver?
 (but with the revision changed back, obviously.)

snapshot from november 2012 is working.


-- 
Regards,
Oleksij
___
ath9k-devel mailing list
ath9k-devel@lists.ath9k.org
https://lists.ath9k.org/mailman/listinfo/ath9k-devel