[ATrpms-devel] New mp3splt suite
http://people.atrpms.net/~pcavalcanti/srpms/libmp3splt-0.9.1-14.fc20.src.rpm http://people.atrpms.net/~pcavalcanti/srpms/mp3splt-2.6.1-14.fc20.src.rpm http://people.atrpms.net/~pcavalcanti/srpms/mp3splt-gtk-0.9.1-14.fc20.src.rpm -- Paulo Roma Cavalcanti LCG - UFRJ ___ atrpms-devel mailing list atrpms-devel@atrpms.net http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-devel
[ATrpms-devel] smplayer 14.3.0
http://people.atrpms.net/~pcavalcanti/srpms/smplayer-14.3.0-9.fc20.src.rpm Axel, this new version only runs if mplayer is compiled with fribidi enabled. This means that ATrpms mplayer has to be recompiled using --with fribidi I think we deactivated this option a long time ago, because it was messing up subtitles with accents. However, it seems to be Ok now. Thanks. -- Paulo Roma Cavalcanti LCG - UFRJ ___ atrpms-devel mailing list atrpms-devel@atrpms.net http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-devel
[ATrpms-devel] New nvidia 331.38
http://people.atrpms.net/~pcavalcanti/srpms/nvidia-graphics331.38-331.38-162.fc20.src.rpm -- Paulo Roma Cavalcanti LCG - UFRJ ___ atrpms-devel mailing list atrpms-devel@atrpms.net http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-devel
[ATrpms-devel] vlc 2.1.3 and mpg123-1.18.0
http://people.atrpms.net/~pcavalcanti/srpms/vlc-2.1.3-13.fc20.src.rpm http://people.atrpms.net/~pcavalcanti/srpms/mpg123-1.18.0-1.fc20.src.rpm -- Paulo Roma Cavalcanti LCG - UFRJ ___ atrpms-devel mailing list atrpms-devel@atrpms.net http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-devel
[ATrpms-devel] vlc 2.1.2
http://people.atrpms.net/~pcavalcanti/srpms/ffmpeg-2.1.1-62.fc20.src.rpm http://people.atrpms.net/~pcavalcanti/srpms/x264-0.138-19_20140102.2245.fc20.src.rpm http://people.atrpms.net/~pcavalcanti/srpms/vlc-2.1.2-12.fc20.src.rpm I had to upgrade ffmpeg and x264, so it works. Thanks. -- Paulo Roma Cavalcanti LCG - UFRJ ___ atrpms-devel mailing list atrpms-devel@atrpms.net http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-devel
[ATrpms-devel] mpg123-1.17.0 available
http://people.atrpms.net/~pcavalcanti/srpms/mpg123-1.17.0-1.fc20.src.rpm Since Fedora 20 dropped alsa-oss-devel, it should be built for it using: --without oss Thanks. -- Paulo Roma Cavalcanti LCG - UFRJ ___ atrpms-devel mailing list atrpms-devel@atrpms.net http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-devel
[ATrpms-devel] xbmc 12.3
xbmc 12.3 is out, and it is using ffmpeg 1.2: http://people.atrpms.net/~pcavalcanti/srpms/xbmc-12.3-3.fc18.src.rpm I forced BuildRequires: ffmpeg-devel 2.0 so it does not pick up version 2.0, which does not compile ... Other than that, everything is the same. Thanks. PS: we still do not have any recent nvidia kmdl for fedora, because the last build failed with 331.20. I am using this version (I posted a fix), and until now I did not see any issue with it... -- Paulo Roma Cavalcanti LCG - UFRJ ___ atrpms-devel mailing list atrpms-devel@atrpms.net http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-devel
Re: [ATrpms-devel] Fixed nvidia driver 331.20
Interesting. I did not notice anything yet, and I can run the C program below just fine: http://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic-p-7435944.html I was having gkrellm dying with version 319.49, but it seems stable until now with 321.20 Maybe this depends on the card type, but I did not see any report for fedora, and rpm fusion is shipping this driver for F19: http://download1.rpmfusion.org/nonfree/fedora/updates/19/x86_64/repoview/index.html Anyway, I removed a test, for applying patch0, from the spec file, which was causing the kernel module compilation fail for fedora. On Mon, Dec 16, 2013 at 6:13 PM, Chris Schanzle schan...@nist.gov wrote: On 12/15/2013 12:58 PM, Paulo Cavalcanti wrote: Axel, I fixed the latest driver, so it builds the kernel module: http://people.atrpms.net/~pcavalcanti/srpms/nvidia-graphics331.20-331.20-162.fc18.src.rpm http://people.atrpms.net/%7Epcavalcanti/srpms/nvidia-graphics331.20-331.20-162.fc18.src.rpm Can you put the wheels to run again? Thanks. -- Paulo Roma Cavalcanti LCG - UFRJ We have found the process signal mask is randomly but frequently corrupted with this version of the drivers. Causes all sorts of interresting issues, like GUI subprocess elements don't quit when the main parent exits. A quick google search of nvidia 331.20 signal mask leads to this thread, and in particular, the following post: https://devtalk.nvidia.com/default/topic/633706/linux/recent-drivers-cause-applications-to-hang-not-start-at-all-or-compilation-failures/post/4031596/#4031596 I suggest more caution than usual before releasing this version. ___ atrpms-devel mailing list atrpms-devel@atrpms.net http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-devel -- Paulo Roma Cavalcanti LCG - UFRJ ___ atrpms-devel mailing list atrpms-devel@atrpms.net http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-devel
[ATrpms-devel] mpd 0.18
Hi, Axel there is a new mpd 0.18 out there, heavily rewritten and bringing back the volume control. However, it breaks sonata, which I had to patch ... This version uses systemd and is meant for Fedora only (rhel should stay with the previous version). http://people.atrpms.net/~pcavalcanti/srpms/mpd-0.18-30.fc18.src.rpm http://people.atrpms.net/~pcavalcanti/srpms/sonata-1.6.2.1-8.fc18.src.rpm Thanks. -- Paulo Roma Cavalcanti LCG - UFRJ ___ atrpms-devel mailing list atrpms-devel@atrpms.net http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-devel
[ATrpms-devel] New vlc and audacious
Vlc had some changes, when using the web interface: http://people.atrpms.net/~pcavalcanti/srpms/vlc-2.1.0-10.fc18.src.rpm http://people.atrpms.net/~pcavalcanti/srpms/audacious-3.4.1-3.fc18.src.rpm http://people.atrpms.net/~pcavalcanti/srpms/audacious-plugins-3.4.1-2.fc18.src.rpm Thanks. -- Paulo Roma Cavalcanti LCG - UFRJ ___ atrpms-devel mailing list atrpms-devel@atrpms.net http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-devel
[ATrpms-devel] transcode with ffmpeg 1.2
http://people.atrpms.net/~pcavalcanti/srpms/transcode-1.1.7-49.fc18.src.rpm This version uses ffmpeg = 1.2.2 The previous version in ATrpms had an undefined reference: export_ffmpeg.so] Starting 1 thread(s) transcode: symbol lookup error: /usr/lib64/transcode/export_ffmpeg.so: undefined symbol: avcodec_thread_init Thanks. -- Paulo Roma Cavalcanti LCG - UFRJ ___ atrpms-devel mailing list atrpms-devel@atrpms.net http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-devel
[ATrpms-devel] Some outdated packages ...
http://people.atrpms.net/~pcavalcanti/srpms/xvidcore-1.3.2-15.fc18.src.rpm http://people.atrpms.net/~pcavalcanti/srpms/vdpau-video-0.7.4-1.fc18.src.rpm http://people.atrpms.net/~pcavalcanti/srpms/ffmpeg-1.2.3-59.fc18.src.rpm Thanks. -- Paulo Roma Cavalcanti LCG - UFRJ ___ atrpms-devel mailing list atrpms-devel@atrpms.net http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-devel
[ATrpms-devel] New mplayer
Mplayer svn uses ffmpeg svn, which only compiles with xvidcore 1.3 (that is why I updated the other packages also). http://people.atrpms.net/~pcavalcanti/srpms/mplayer-1.2-92_snap20130909.fc18.src.rpm The previous mplayer in ATrpms crashes when using vdpau for me. I hope this new version fixes the issue... Thanks. -- Paulo Roma Cavalcanti LCG - UFRJ ___ atrpms-devel mailing list atrpms-devel@atrpms.net http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-devel
[ATrpms-devel] mpd for rhel6
This is mpd 0.17.5 for rhel6. It is necessary to update libmikmod first, to avoid an undefined reference: http://people.atrpms.net/~pcavalcanti/srpms/libmikmod-3.2.0-21.fc18.src.rpm http://people.atrpms.net/~pcavalcanti/srpms/mpd-0.17.5-26.el6.src.rpm Thanks. -- Paulo Roma Cavalcanti LCG - UFRJ ___ atrpms-devel mailing list atrpms-devel@atrpms.net http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-devel
Re: [ATrpms-devel] Nvidia 319.49
In fact nvidia-graphics319.49-libs: Depends: libGL.so()(64bit) but it is not installable is still there ... On Thu, Sep 5, 2013 at 7:18 AM, Paulo Cavalcanti pro...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, Axel to my surprise nvidia 349.19 builds with kernels 3.10. It does not solve my gnome problem, but cinnamon is at full speed again, and no more libGL.so complaints... http://people.atrpms.net/~pcavalcanti/srpms/nvidia-graphics319.49-319.49-158.fc18.src.rpm I would suggest to compile this new driver as soon as possible. Thanks. -- Paulo Roma Cavalcanti LCG - UFRJ -- Paulo Roma Cavalcanti DCC - UFRJ ___ atrpms-devel mailing list atrpms-devel@atrpms.net http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-devel
Re: [ATrpms-devel] nvidia kmdls missing
I was referring to the old stable versions, but they do not build any more, anyway ... I have recently upgraded via fedup from F17 to F18. The only nvidia driver available for me is the newest 325.15, since the previous versions do not compile on kernels = 3.10 Since then, I am unable to login in gnome. I get Oh, Something went wrong on a black screen and I am kicked out. Kde works just fine, though, and cinnamon is unbearable slow. I am using RedHat since 1997 and this is the first time gnome fails me ... I was wandering whether this has anything to do with my card GeForce GT 640 and this new driver (I do not have any other version to try). On Wed, Sep 4, 2013 at 4:50 AM, Axel Thimm axel.th...@atrpms.net wrote: On Tue, Aug 27, 2013 at 11:37:45PM -0300, Paulo Cavalcanti wrote: On Tue, Aug 27, 2013 at 10:30 PM, Paulo Cavalcanti pro...@gmail.com wrote: Axel, there is not a single nvidia kmdl available in the repo for the long lived version. I am trying to upgrade to F18 and I am stuck, because I do not have X running and nvidia 325 does not install either. Thanks. I see now. Nividia kmdl does not compile under 3.10. I forced the installation of nvidia 325.15 and I finally have X running on F18... The error I got was: nvidia-graphics325.15-libs: Depends: libGL.so()(64bit) but it is not installable nvidia-graphics325.15-libs.32bit: Depends: libGL.so but it is not installable Any ideas? Not realy ATM - I only see that it is missing the '.1'. Probably a bad nvidia build, and in that case all we can do is wait for the next update. :( -- Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net ___ atrpms-devel mailing list atrpms-devel@atrpms.net http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-devel -- Paulo Roma Cavalcanti DCC - UFRJ ___ atrpms-devel mailing list atrpms-devel@atrpms.net http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-devel
[ATrpms-devel] New smplayer
http://people.atrpms.net/~pcavalcanti/srpms/smplayer-0.8.6-8.fc18.src.rpm Thanks. -- Paulo Roma Cavalcanti LCG - UFRJ ___ atrpms-devel mailing list atrpms-devel@atrpms.net http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-devel
[ATrpms-devel] Fixed acidrip
http://people.atrpms.net/~pcavalcanti/srpms/acidrip-0.14-8.fc18.src.rpm Also, gnump3d builds fine here for F18. Can you try a rebuild? Thanks. -- Paulo Roma Cavalcanti LCG - UFRJ ___ atrpms-devel mailing list atrpms-devel@atrpms.net http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-devel
[ATrpms-devel] New mp3splt suite and mpd
http://people.atrpms.net/~pcavalcanti/srpms/mpd-0.17.5-28.fc18.src.rpm http://people.atrpms.net/~pcavalcanti/srpms/libmp3splt-0.9.0-13.fc18.src.rpm http://people.atrpms.net/~pcavalcanti/srpms/mp3splt-2.6-13.fc18.src.rpm http://people.atrpms.net/~pcavalcanti/srpms/mp3splt-gtk-0.9-13.fc18.src.rpm Thanks. -- Paulo Roma Cavalcanti LCG - UFRJ ___ atrpms-devel mailing list atrpms-devel@atrpms.net http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-devel
[ATrpms-devel] Updating ffmpeg and mplayer
Hi, Axel can we update ffmpeg/mplayer? I am not being able to use vdpau reliably since some time ago... Thanks. -- Paulo Roma Cavalcanti LCG - UFRJ ___ atrpms-devel mailing list atrpms-devel@atrpms.net http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-devel
Re: [ATrpms-devel] avidemux 2.6.4 available
I just rebuilt avidemux using mock under F18, and again no problem at all ... bin is a symlink to /usr/bin here: [cascavel:/] dir bin lrwxrwxrwx. 1 root 7 Aug 27 19:29 bin - usr/bin You are saying your environment is generating dependencies under /bin? On Sat, Aug 3, 2013 at 11:33 AM, Axel Thimm axel.th...@atrpms.net wrote: On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 03:20:20PM -0300, Paulo Cavalcanti wrote: I did no understand. I also built it for F19 with mock... Hm, the file dependencies are on a file under /bin and the file is by now under /usr/bin. On what platform did you build f19 with mock? I suspect that there is some special support in the compoannets used for the bin move support which I don't have. On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 5:37 AM, Axel Thimm axel.th...@atrpms.net wrote: On Wed, Jul 17, 2013 at 09:34:20AM -0300, Paulo Cavalcanti wrote: Axel, I added the option for ignoring js-devel: --without js http://people.atrpms.net/~pcavalcanti/srpms/avidemux-2.6.4-2.fc17.src.rpm On Fedora due to the shifting of /bin and the like the builds all fail. :( Can you also recreate qt47 (maybe qt48) and fix the qt-x11 issue? Thanks. On Wed, Jul 3, 2013 at 8:34 AM, Paulo Cavalcanti pro...@gmail.com wrote: I am using js-devel 1.70 from epel on rhel6. Can you add this as a new package or should we just filter this option in the spec? As I stated before, avidemux is running fine on rhel6 with qt47. However, there is a conflict with the original qt-x11: rpm -qf /usr/bin/qdbusviewer qt-x11-4.6.2-26.el6_4.x86_64 qt47-x11-4.7.2-1_18.el6.x86_64 On Wed, Jul 3, 2013 at 2:21 AM, Axel Thimm axel.th...@atrpms.net wrote: Hi, for el6 it fails with a missing dependency on js-devel. For el5 it fails with missing dependencies on libvpx-devel and pulseaudio-libs-devel. On Sat, Jun 29, 2013 at 08:29:43AM -0300, Paulo Cavalcanti wrote: Hi, Axel here it is: http://people.atrpms.net/~pcavalcanti/srpms/avidemux-2.6.4-1.fc17.src.rpm It requires qt4 = 4.7 (remember - rhel6 ships 4.6.2). Otherwise, it does not link (unresolved references). For rhel6 (or F14) should be built with: --without gtk3 Thanks. -- Paulo Roma Cavalcanti LCG - UFRJ ___ atrpms-devel mailing list atrpms-devel@atrpms.net http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-devel -- Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net ___ atrpms-devel mailing list atrpms-devel@atrpms.net http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-devel -- Paulo Roma Cavalcanti DCC - UFRJ -- Paulo Roma Cavalcanti DCC - UFRJ ___ atrpms-devel mailing list atrpms-devel@atrpms.net http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-devel -- Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net ___ atrpms-devel mailing list atrpms-devel@atrpms.net http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-devel -- Paulo Roma Cavalcanti DCC - UFRJ ___ atrpms-devel mailing list atrpms-devel@atrpms.net http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-devel -- Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net ___ atrpms-devel mailing list atrpms-devel@atrpms.net http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-devel -- Paulo Roma Cavalcanti DCC - UFRJ ___ atrpms-devel mailing list atrpms-devel@atrpms.net http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-devel
[ATrpms-devel] nvidia kmdls missing
On Tue, Aug 27, 2013 at 10:30 PM, Paulo Cavalcanti pro...@gmail.com wrote: Axel, there is not a single nvidia kmdl available in the repo for the long lived version. I am trying to upgrade to F18 and I am stuck, because I do not have X running and nvidia 325 does not install either. Thanks. I see now. Nividia kmdl does not compile under 3.10. I forced the installation of nvidia 325.15 and I finally have X running on F18... The error I got was: nvidia-graphics325.15-libs: Depends: libGL.so()(64bit) but it is not installable nvidia-graphics325.15-libs.32bit: Depends: libGL.so but it is not installable Any ideas? -- Paulo Roma Cavalcanti LCG - UFRJ ___ atrpms-devel mailing list atrpms-devel@atrpms.net http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-devel
Re: [ATrpms-devel] broadcom-wl-5.100.82.112-6.el6
But I am using this fixed new driver on a LeNovo running rhel6 just fine. It is worth supporting broadcom on rhel6, because the fix was just redefining the switches on the code based on the kernel versions. Everything was done in the spec file just using sed ... On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 5:34 AM, Axel Thimm axel.th...@atrpms.net wrote: Thanks, ATM nothing builds under the new Fedora kernels anymore ... :( On Sat, Jul 20, 2013 at 08:08:04AM -0300, Paulo Cavalcanti wrote: Anyway, I fixed the compilation for rhel6: http://people.atrpms.net/~pcavalcanti/srpms/broadcom-wl-5.100.82.112-7.fc17.src.rpm On Sat, Jul 20, 2013 at 7:33 AM, Paulo Cavalcanti pro...@gmail.com wrote: Axel, the kernel module does not build for rhel6. This is the reason I have never upgraded this package. The previous version works just fine for me ... -- Paulo Roma Cavalcanti LCG - UFRJ -- Paulo Roma Cavalcanti DCC - UFRJ ___ atrpms-devel mailing list atrpms-devel@atrpms.net http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-devel -- Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net ___ atrpms-devel mailing list atrpms-devel@atrpms.net http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-devel -- Paulo Roma Cavalcanti DCC - UFRJ ___ atrpms-devel mailing list atrpms-devel@atrpms.net http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-devel
Re: [ATrpms-devel] avidemux 2.6.4 available
I did no understand. I also built it for F19 with mock... On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 5:37 AM, Axel Thimm axel.th...@atrpms.net wrote: On Wed, Jul 17, 2013 at 09:34:20AM -0300, Paulo Cavalcanti wrote: Axel, I added the option for ignoring js-devel: --without js http://people.atrpms.net/~pcavalcanti/srpms/avidemux-2.6.4-2.fc17.src.rpm On Fedora due to the shifting of /bin and the like the builds all fail. :( Can you also recreate qt47 (maybe qt48) and fix the qt-x11 issue? Thanks. On Wed, Jul 3, 2013 at 8:34 AM, Paulo Cavalcanti pro...@gmail.com wrote: I am using js-devel 1.70 from epel on rhel6. Can you add this as a new package or should we just filter this option in the spec? As I stated before, avidemux is running fine on rhel6 with qt47. However, there is a conflict with the original qt-x11: rpm -qf /usr/bin/qdbusviewer qt-x11-4.6.2-26.el6_4.x86_64 qt47-x11-4.7.2-1_18.el6.x86_64 On Wed, Jul 3, 2013 at 2:21 AM, Axel Thimm axel.th...@atrpms.net wrote: Hi, for el6 it fails with a missing dependency on js-devel. For el5 it fails with missing dependencies on libvpx-devel and pulseaudio-libs-devel. On Sat, Jun 29, 2013 at 08:29:43AM -0300, Paulo Cavalcanti wrote: Hi, Axel here it is: http://people.atrpms.net/~pcavalcanti/srpms/avidemux-2.6.4-1.fc17.src.rpm It requires qt4 = 4.7 (remember - rhel6 ships 4.6.2). Otherwise, it does not link (unresolved references). For rhel6 (or F14) should be built with: --without gtk3 Thanks. -- Paulo Roma Cavalcanti LCG - UFRJ ___ atrpms-devel mailing list atrpms-devel@atrpms.net http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-devel -- Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net ___ atrpms-devel mailing list atrpms-devel@atrpms.net http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-devel -- Paulo Roma Cavalcanti DCC - UFRJ -- Paulo Roma Cavalcanti DCC - UFRJ ___ atrpms-devel mailing list atrpms-devel@atrpms.net http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-devel -- Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net ___ atrpms-devel mailing list atrpms-devel@atrpms.net http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-devel -- Paulo Roma Cavalcanti DCC - UFRJ ___ atrpms-devel mailing list atrpms-devel@atrpms.net http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-devel
Re: [ATrpms-devel] CGAL 4.1 available
It should build for rhel5 with a repack of mpfr... http://people.atrpms.net/~pcavalcanti/srpms/mpfr-2.4.2-1.el5.src.rpm On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 5:26 AM, Axel Thimm axel.th...@atrpms.net wrote: Hi, forget the comment, it never did build for RHEL5 in the past as well. I'll just remove the RHEL5 build assignment. On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 10:17:33AM +0200, Axel Thimm wrote: On Sun, Jul 21, 2013 at 08:09:13AM -0300, Paulo Cavalcanti wrote: http://people.atrpms.net/~pcavalcanti/srpms/CGAL-4.1-1.fc17.src.rpm Thanks, doesn't build anymore for RHEL5: Error: Package: repot-build-deps-22123-1-1.noarch (tmp) Requires: mpfr-devel Probably a new dependency - should I just drop CGAL from RHEL5? -- Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net ___ atrpms-devel mailing list atrpms-devel@atrpms.net http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-devel -- Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net ___ atrpms-devel mailing list atrpms-devel@atrpms.net http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-devel -- Paulo Roma Cavalcanti DCC - UFRJ ___ atrpms-devel mailing list atrpms-devel@atrpms.net http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-devel
Re: [ATrpms-devel] CGAL 4.1 available
and a new boost = 1.39 On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 3:23 PM, Paulo Cavalcanti pro...@gmail.com wrote: It should build for rhel5 with a repack of mpfr... http://people.atrpms.net/~pcavalcanti/srpms/mpfr-2.4.2-1.el5.src.rpm On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 5:26 AM, Axel Thimm axel.th...@atrpms.net wrote: Hi, forget the comment, it never did build for RHEL5 in the past as well. I'll just remove the RHEL5 build assignment. On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 10:17:33AM +0200, Axel Thimm wrote: On Sun, Jul 21, 2013 at 08:09:13AM -0300, Paulo Cavalcanti wrote: http://people.atrpms.net/~pcavalcanti/srpms/CGAL-4.1-1.fc17.src.rpm Thanks, doesn't build anymore for RHEL5: Error: Package: repot-build-deps-22123-1-1.noarch (tmp) Requires: mpfr-devel Probably a new dependency - should I just drop CGAL from RHEL5? -- Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net ___ atrpms-devel mailing list atrpms-devel@atrpms.net http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-devel -- Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net ___ atrpms-devel mailing list atrpms-devel@atrpms.net http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-devel -- Paulo Roma Cavalcanti DCC - UFRJ -- Paulo Roma Cavalcanti DCC - UFRJ ___ atrpms-devel mailing list atrpms-devel@atrpms.net http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-devel
Re: [ATrpms-devel] New npapi-vlc available
I do not know. Here I get:
checking for g++... g++
checking whether we are using the GNU C++ compiler... yes
checking whether g++ accepts -g... yes
checking dependency style of g++... gcc3
./configure: line 5529: AC_PROG_OBJCXX: command not found
checking for a sed that does not truncate output... /bin/sed
checking for fgrep... /bin/grep -F
checking for ld used by gcc -std=gnu99... /usr/bin/ld
The patch adds an
m4_pattern_allow(AC_PROG_OBJCXX)
so the configure proceeds.
Maybe some dependencies are missing. I just require libtool. Do you need
to add autoconf and automake in your environment?
On Sat, Jul 27, 2013 at 2:59 AM, Axel Thimm axel.th...@atrpms.net wrote:
Hi,
On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 09:04:51AM -0300, Paulo Cavalcanti wrote:
Hi Axel,
I have just downloaded
http://dl.atrpms.net/src/el6-i386/atrpms/stable/npapi-vlc-2.0.6-0.2git47ea8c7.src.rpm
and it builds fine here with mock.
The patch is being applied conditionally this way:
# RHEL6 fix
%if 0%{?rhel} 5
%patch0 -p1 -b .el6
%endif
I can use --with rhel if you prefer ...
I had used --define rhel\ 6 and the patch had been applied:
+ cd npapi-vlc-47ea8c7
+ /bin/chmod -Rf a+rX,u+w,g-w,o-w .
+ echo 'Patch #0 (npapi-vlc-47ea8c7-el6.patch):'
Patch #0 (npapi-vlc-47ea8c7-el6.patch):
+ /bin/cat /var/tmp/repot-build/SOURCES/npapi-vlc-47ea8c7-el6.patch
What else could be causing this?
On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 8:34 AM, Axel Thimm axel.th...@atrpms.net
wrote:
Hi,
On Wed, Jul 03, 2013 at 01:10:11PM -0300, Paulo Cavalcanti wrote:
Sorry, Axel, my bad.
I patched for rhel6, and it built there, but the patch broke
the other Fedora systems.
I re-uploaded the same .src.rpm and the patch is only applied on
rhel6
now.
it now breaks on RHEL6 with:
checking for g++... g++
checking whether we are using the GNU C++ compiler... yes
checking whether g++ accepts -g... yes
checking dependency style of g++... gcc3
configure: WARNING: using cross tools not prefixed with host triplet
./configure: line 5382: syntax error near unexpected token `;;'
./configure: line 5382: `ac_tool_warned=yes ;;'
error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.WWo60t (%build)
On Wed, Jul 3, 2013 at 2:14 AM, Axel Thimm axel.th...@atrpms.net
wrote:
Hi,
On Sun, Jun 30, 2013 at 11:41:02AM -0300, Paulo Cavalcanti wrote:
http://people.atrpms.net/~pcavalcanti/srpms/npapi-vlc-2.0.6-0.2git47ea8c7.fc17.src.rpm
This doesn't build on any platform. For f17 for example it fails
with:
checking for g++... g++
checking whether we are using the GNU C++ compiler... yes
checking whether g++ accepts -g... yes
checking dependency style of g++... none
configure: WARNING: using cross tools not prefixed with host
triplet
./configure: line 5302: syntax error near unexpected token `;;'
./configure: line 5302: `ac_tool_warned=yes ;;'
error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.QbkvsR (%build)
--
Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net
___
atrpms-devel mailing list
atrpms-devel@atrpms.net
http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-devel
--
Paulo Roma Cavalcanti
DCC - UFRJ
___
atrpms-devel mailing list
atrpms-devel@atrpms.net
http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-devel
--
Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net
___
atrpms-devel mailing list
atrpms-devel@atrpms.net
http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-devel
--
Paulo Roma Cavalcanti
DCC - UFRJ
___
atrpms-devel mailing list
atrpms-devel@atrpms.net
http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-devel
--
Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net
___
atrpms-devel mailing list
atrpms-devel@atrpms.net
http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-devel
--
Paulo Roma Cavalcanti
DCC - UFRJ
___
atrpms-devel mailing list
atrpms-devel@atrpms.net
http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-devel
Re: [ATrpms-devel] New mpd available
Hi,
the version for F17 uses systemd, ant the other for rhel6, does not.
What version do you mean?
On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 8:51 AM, Kim Bisgaard
kim...@alleroedderne.adsl.dkwrote:
Hi Paulo,
Could I persuade you to create the directory with the socket file in the
package? This prevents the package to work on distributions with systemd.
The spec-file-fu is something like the following:
file mpd.tpmfilesd with this line:
d /var/run/mpd 0755 mpd audio -
Source10: mpd.tmpfilesd
%if %{with systemd}
#install -p -D -m 644 %{SOURCE10} $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_tmpfilesdir}/mpd.conf
install -p -D -m 644 %{SOURCE10} $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/etc/tmpfiles.d/mpd.conf
%endif
Regards,
Kim
On 2013-07-10 14:30, Paulo Cavalcanti wrote:
Hi, Axel
I have two versions. One for Fedora, which uses mpd.service,
and another for rhel6 with /etc/rc.d/init.d/mpd.
The fedora version is the same we had before, but the rhel6 will allow
an upgrade from the previous 0.16.7 we have at ATrpms.
Thanks.
http://people.atrpms.net/~pcavalcanti/srpms/mpd-0.17.4-25.el6.src.rpm
http://people.atrpms.net/~pcavalcanti/srpms/mpd-0.17.4-27.fc17.src.rpm
--
Paulo Roma Cavalcanti
LCG - UFRJ
___
atrpms-devel mailing
listatrpms-devel@atrpms.nethttp://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-devel
___
atrpms-devel mailing list
atrpms-devel@atrpms.net
http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-devel
--
Paulo Roma Cavalcanti
DCC - UFRJ
___
atrpms-devel mailing list
atrpms-devel@atrpms.net
http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-devel
Re: [ATrpms-devel] New mpd available
mpd has a directory where, among other things, its database and pid are
stored.
If mpd is run system wide as root, this is /var/lib/mpd, as you should set
in
/etc/mpd.conf:
cascavel:~] ls -al /var/lib/mpd
total 12604
drwxr-xr-x. 5 mpd mpd4096 Jul 18 07:12 .
drwxrwxr-x. 78 root procgrafico4096 Jul 14 22:37 ..
-rw-r--r--. 1 mpd mpd 3350971 Jul 20 17:37 database
-rw---. 1 mpd mpd 16 Jul 5 2012 .esd_auth
-rw-r--r--. 1 root root9508991 Jul 24 18:20 log
drwxr-xr-x. 2 mpd mpd4096 Jul 10 09:08 music
-rw-r--r--. 1 mpd mpd 5 Jul 18 07:12 pid
drwxr-xr-x. 2 mpd mpd4096 Jul 10 09:08 playlists
drwx--. 2 mpd mpd4096 Feb 9 00:09 .pulse
-rw---. 1 mpd mpd 256 Jul 5 2012 .pulse-cookie
-rw-r--r--. 1 mpd mpd3258 Jul 20 17:42 state
If mpd is run for a single user this is generally ~/.mpd:
[cascavel:~] ls -al ~/.mpd
total 8260
drwxrwxr-x. 4 roma roma4096 Mar 11 08:45 .
drwxr-xr-x. 115 roma roma 12288 Jul 24 17:10 ..
drwxrwxr-x. 2 roma roma4096 Sep 2 2012 .AppleDouble
-rw-rw-r--. 1 roma roma 3313663 Mar 7 09:00 database
-rw-rw-r--. 1 roma roma 5093395 Mar 11 17:30 log
-rw-r--r--. 1 roma roma 13727 Jul 7 2012 mpd.conf
-rw-rw-r--. 1 roma roma 5 Mar 11 08:45 pid
drwxrwxr-x. 2 roma roma4096 Oct 14 2012 playlists
-rw-rw-r--. 1 roma roma3917 Mar 7 09:32 state
Therefore, there has never been a /var/run/mpd. To use the system wide
approach with selinux active, the files must be labelled audio_home_t.
Nonetheless, you have to edit /etc/mpd.conf and set your choices,
removing the pounds (#) at least until:
#state_file /var/lib/mpd/state
Otherwise, I doubt mpd will work...
On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 8:14 AM, Kim Bisgaard
kim...@alleroedderne.adsl.dkwrote:
Hi Paulo,
I have tried to use it on F19. THANKS!!
I could not get it to start. It threw a very misleading error - Failed to
bind to 'localhost': No such file or directory, but the real reason was
that the directory /var/run/mpd was not created.
This in it self has nothing to do with systemd as such, just because
Fedora introduced the empty /var at the same time (tmpfs mounted /var) .
Hope this clears it up?
Regards,
Kim
On 2013-07-25 12:25, Paulo Cavalcanti wrote:
Hi,
the version for F17 uses systemd, ant the other for rhel6, does not.
What version do you mean?
On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 8:51 AM, Kim Bisgaard
kim...@alleroedderne.adsl.dk wrote:
Hi Paulo,
Could I persuade you to create the directory with the socket file in the
package? This prevents the package to work on distributions with systemd.
The spec-file-fu is something like the following:
file mpd.tpmfilesd with this line:
d /var/run/mpd 0755 mpd audio -
Source10: mpd.tmpfilesd
%if %{with systemd}
#install -p -D -m 644 %{SOURCE10} $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_tmpfilesdir}/mpd.conf
install -p -D -m 644 %{SOURCE10} $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/etc/tmpfiles.d/mpd.conf
%endif
Regards,
Kim
On 2013-07-10 14:30, Paulo Cavalcanti wrote:
Hi, Axel
I have two versions. One for Fedora, which uses mpd.service,
and another for rhel6 with /etc/rc.d/init.d/mpd.
The fedora version is the same we had before, but the rhel6 will allow
an upgrade from the previous 0.16.7 we have at ATrpms.
Thanks.
http://people.atrpms.net/~pcavalcanti/srpms/mpd-0.17.4-25.el6.src.rpm
http://people.atrpms.net/~pcavalcanti/srpms/mpd-0.17.4-27.fc17.src.rpm
--
Paulo Roma Cavalcanti
LCG - UFRJ
___
atrpms-devel mailing
listatrpms-devel@atrpms.nethttp://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-devel
___
atrpms-devel mailing list
atrpms-devel@atrpms.net
http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-devel
--
Paulo Roma Cavalcanti
DCC - UFRJ
___
atrpms-devel mailing
listatrpms-devel@atrpms.nethttp://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-devel
___
atrpms-devel mailing list
atrpms-devel@atrpms.net
http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-devel
--
Paulo Roma Cavalcanti
DCC - UFRJ
___
atrpms-devel mailing list
atrpms-devel@atrpms.net
http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-devel
[ATrpms-devel] broadcom-wl-5.100.82.112-6.el6
Axel, the kernel module does not build for rhel6. This is the reason I have never upgraded this package. The previous version works just fine for me ... -- Paulo Roma Cavalcanti LCG - UFRJ ___ atrpms-devel mailing list atrpms-devel@atrpms.net http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-devel
Re: [ATrpms-devel] broadcom-wl-5.100.82.112-6.el6
Anyway, I fixed the compilation for rhel6: http://people.atrpms.net/~pcavalcanti/srpms/broadcom-wl-5.100.82.112-7.fc17.src.rpm On Sat, Jul 20, 2013 at 7:33 AM, Paulo Cavalcanti pro...@gmail.com wrote: Axel, the kernel module does not build for rhel6. This is the reason I have never upgraded this package. The previous version works just fine for me ... -- Paulo Roma Cavalcanti LCG - UFRJ -- Paulo Roma Cavalcanti DCC - UFRJ ___ atrpms-devel mailing list atrpms-devel@atrpms.net http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-devel
[ATrpms-devel] rar,unrar 4.2
http://people.atrpms.net/~pcavalcanti/srpms/unrar-4.2.4-1.fc17.src.rpm http://people.atrpms.net/~pcavalcanti/srpms/rar-4.2.0-4.fc17.src.rpm -- Paulo Roma Cavalcanti LCG - UFRJ ___ atrpms-devel mailing list atrpms-devel@atrpms.net http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-devel
[ATrpms-devel] audacious 3.4 available
http://people.atrpms.net/~pcavalcanti/srpms/audacious-3.4-1.fc17.src.rpm http://people.atrpms.net/~pcavalcanti/srpms/audacious-plugins-3.4-1.fc17.src.rpm As before, requires gtk3. -- Paulo Roma Cavalcanti DCC - UFRJ ___ atrpms-devel mailing list atrpms-devel@atrpms.net http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-devel
Re: [ATrpms-devel] avidemux 2.6.4 available
Axel, I added the option for ignoring js-devel: --without js http://people.atrpms.net/~pcavalcanti/srpms/avidemux-2.6.4-2.fc17.src.rpm Can you also recreate qt47 (maybe qt48) and fix the qt-x11 issue? Thanks. On Wed, Jul 3, 2013 at 8:34 AM, Paulo Cavalcanti pro...@gmail.com wrote: I am using js-devel 1.70 from epel on rhel6. Can you add this as a new package or should we just filter this option in the spec? As I stated before, avidemux is running fine on rhel6 with qt47. However, there is a conflict with the original qt-x11: rpm -qf /usr/bin/qdbusviewer qt-x11-4.6.2-26.el6_4.x86_64 qt47-x11-4.7.2-1_18.el6.x86_64 On Wed, Jul 3, 2013 at 2:21 AM, Axel Thimm axel.th...@atrpms.net wrote: Hi, for el6 it fails with a missing dependency on js-devel. For el5 it fails with missing dependencies on libvpx-devel and pulseaudio-libs-devel. On Sat, Jun 29, 2013 at 08:29:43AM -0300, Paulo Cavalcanti wrote: Hi, Axel here it is: http://people.atrpms.net/~pcavalcanti/srpms/avidemux-2.6.4-1.fc17.src.rpm It requires qt4 = 4.7 (remember - rhel6 ships 4.6.2). Otherwise, it does not link (unresolved references). For rhel6 (or F14) should be built with: --without gtk3 Thanks. -- Paulo Roma Cavalcanti LCG - UFRJ ___ atrpms-devel mailing list atrpms-devel@atrpms.net http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-devel -- Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net ___ atrpms-devel mailing list atrpms-devel@atrpms.net http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-devel -- Paulo Roma Cavalcanti DCC - UFRJ -- Paulo Roma Cavalcanti DCC - UFRJ ___ atrpms-devel mailing list atrpms-devel@atrpms.net http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-devel
[ATrpms-devel] New mpd available
Hi, Axel I have two versions. One for Fedora, which uses mpd.service, and another for rhel6 with /etc/rc.d/init.d/mpd. The fedora version is the same we had before, but the rhel6 will allow an upgrade from the previous 0.16.7 we have at ATrpms. Thanks. http://people.atrpms.net/~pcavalcanti/srpms/mpd-0.17.4-25.el6.src.rpm http://people.atrpms.net/~pcavalcanti/srpms/mpd-0.17.4-27.fc17.src.rpm -- Paulo Roma Cavalcanti LCG - UFRJ ___ atrpms-devel mailing list atrpms-devel@atrpms.net http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-devel
Re: [ATrpms-devel] New npapi-vlc available
Sorry, Axel, my bad. I patched for rhel6, and it built there, but the patch broke the other Fedora systems. I re-uploaded the same .src.rpm and the patch is only applied on rhel6 now. Thanks. On Wed, Jul 3, 2013 at 2:14 AM, Axel Thimm axel.th...@atrpms.net wrote: Hi, On Sun, Jun 30, 2013 at 11:41:02AM -0300, Paulo Cavalcanti wrote: http://people.atrpms.net/~pcavalcanti/srpms/npapi-vlc-2.0.6-0.2git47ea8c7.fc17.src.rpm This doesn't build on any platform. For f17 for example it fails with: checking for g++... g++ checking whether we are using the GNU C++ compiler... yes checking whether g++ accepts -g... yes checking dependency style of g++... none configure: WARNING: using cross tools not prefixed with host triplet ./configure: line 5302: syntax error near unexpected token `;;' ./configure: line 5302: `ac_tool_warned=yes ;;' error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.QbkvsR (%build) -- Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net ___ atrpms-devel mailing list atrpms-devel@atrpms.net http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-devel -- Paulo Roma Cavalcanti DCC - UFRJ ___ atrpms-devel mailing list atrpms-devel@atrpms.net http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-devel
[ATrpms-devel] New npapi-vlc available
http://people.atrpms.net/~pcavalcanti/srpms/npapi-vlc-2.0.6-0.2git47ea8c7.fc17.src.rpm -- Paulo Roma Cavalcanti LCG - UFRJ ___ atrpms-devel mailing list atrpms-devel@atrpms.net http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-devel
Re: [ATrpms-devel] avidemux
The link is broken ... I would also take a look at the package from Fusion: http://download1.rpmfusion.org/free/fedora/updates/18/SRPMS/avidemux-2.6.4-3.fc18.src.rpm On Sat, Jun 22, 2013 at 8:39 AM, Kim Bisgaard kim...@alleroedderne.adsl.dkwrote: Hi Axel and Paulo, I have after MANY attempts managed to get avidemux-2.6.4 to compile and build :-) at least on f18 and f19. I assumed all patches was upstreamed, so they are removed. I had to removed all that has to with languages (%find_lang) as it erred out. Many files and directories have changed names ... Paulo could you try to recompile the package, and possibly also test, to see if it is sensible what I have done? http://people.atrpms.net/~**kbisgaard/avidemux-2.6.4-31.**fc19.src.rpmhttp://people.atrpms.net/~kbisgaard/avidemux-2.6.4-31.fc19.src.rpm Regards, Kim __**_ atrpms-devel mailing list atrpms-devel@atrpms.net http://lists.atrpms.net/**mailman/listinfo/atrpms-develhttp://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-devel -- Paulo Roma Cavalcanti DCC - UFRJ ___ atrpms-devel mailing list atrpms-devel@atrpms.net http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-devel
[ATrpms-devel] xbmc for F17 missing
Did you build xbmc for F17? Thanks. -- Paulo Roma Cavalcanti LCG - UFRJ ___ atrpms-devel mailing list atrpms-devel@atrpms.net http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-devel
Re: [ATrpms-devel] YafaRay
Yes. But this version of yafaray only works with blender until version 2.49b. Blender 2.62 and up requires the newer yafaray 0.1.5, which can be installed directly by clicking a single button on the interface. http://vimeo.com/37373819 Therefore, I lost the interest in creating another yafaray package for now... On Sat, Jun 15, 2013 at 10:07 AM, Axel Thimm axel.th...@atrpms.net wrote: Hi, On Sat, Jun 15, 2013 at 01:31:47PM +0200, Kim Bisgaard wrote: Hi Axel, Do you want a package if it is already in Fedora? everything that adds value to the people pulling the packages is OK. If it is breaking something, then not, of course. More concrete on the yafaray bits: These are all from Paulo, and I forget what the history was, but I think he had a hard time getting the packages with upstream (Fedora) to import/work properly. yum list YafaRay-blender.x86_64 blender.x86_64 Available Packages YafaRay-blender.x86_64 0.1.1-8.fc19 fedora blender.x86_64 1:2.67b-1.fc19 updates-testing # yum --showduplicates list YafaRay-blender.x86_64 blender.x86_64 YafaRay-blender.x86_640.1.1-6.fc18 fedora blender.x86_641:2.64a-3.fc18 fedora blender.x86_641:2.67a-2.fc18 updates blender.x86_641:2.67b-1.fc18 updates-testing Regards, Kim ___ atrpms-devel mailing list atrpms-devel@atrpms.net http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-devel -- Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net ___ atrpms-devel mailing list atrpms-devel@atrpms.net http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-devel -- Paulo Roma Cavalcanti DCC - UFRJ ___ atrpms-devel mailing list atrpms-devel@atrpms.net http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-devel
[ATrpms-devel] New libmatroska and vlc
Axel, you will have to rebuild vlc on rhel6 because of the new libmatroska 1.4. As far as I know, vlc does not build with libdvbpsi 1.0. You will have to force the previous version 0.2.2: BuildRequires: libdvbpsi-devel 1.0 Thanks. -- Paulo Roma Cavalcanti LCG - UFRJ ___ atrpms-devel mailing list atrpms-devel@atrpms.net http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-devel
Re: [ATrpms-devel] YafaRay
The normal plugin (local) installation goes to ~/.config/blender/2.67/scripts/addons/yafaray and the system wide goes to: /opt/blender-2.67b-linux-glibc211-x86_64/2.67/scripts/addons/yafaray in case blender is installed in /opt (what I do in rhel6). I do not know why there is no 64 bit version of the linux plugin for the latest 2.67b version. There is a working version for Mac OS, though... Maybe it is not a waste of time to repack this new yafaray version after all ... On Sun, Jun 16, 2013 at 3:49 PM, Axel Thimm axel.th...@atrpms.net wrote: On Sun, Jun 16, 2013 at 11:00:57AM -0300, Paulo Cavalcanti wrote: Yes. But this version of yafaray only works with blender until version 2.49b. Blender 2.62 and up requires the newer yafaray 0.1.5, which can be installed directly by clicking a single button on the interface. http://vimeo.com/37373819 Therefore, I lost the interest in creating another yafaray package for now... :) Just out of curiosity, how does the direct install work? For each user under his home, or does it require root authorization and if so, where does the download land? /usr/local, /opt? On Sat, Jun 15, 2013 at 10:07 AM, Axel Thimm axel.th...@atrpms.net wrote: Hi, On Sat, Jun 15, 2013 at 01:31:47PM +0200, Kim Bisgaard wrote: Hi Axel, Do you want a package if it is already in Fedora? everything that adds value to the people pulling the packages is OK. If it is breaking something, then not, of course. More concrete on the yafaray bits: These are all from Paulo, and I forget what the history was, but I think he had a hard time getting the packages with upstream (Fedora) to import/work properly. yum list YafaRay-blender.x86_64 blender.x86_64 Available Packages YafaRay-blender.x86_64 0.1.1-8.fc19 fedora blender.x86_64 1:2.67b-1.fc19 updates-testing # yum --showduplicates list YafaRay-blender.x86_64 blender.x86_64 YafaRay-blender.x86_640.1.1-6.fc18 fedora blender.x86_641:2.64a-3.fc18 fedora blender.x86_641:2.67a-2.fc18 updates blender.x86_641:2.67b-1.fc18 updates-testing Regards, Kim ___ atrpms-devel mailing list atrpms-devel@atrpms.net http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-devel -- Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net ___ atrpms-devel mailing list atrpms-devel@atrpms.net http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-devel -- Paulo Roma Cavalcanti DCC - UFRJ ___ atrpms-devel mailing list atrpms-devel@atrpms.net http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-devel -- Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net ___ atrpms-devel mailing list atrpms-devel@atrpms.net http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-devel -- Paulo Roma Cavalcanti DCC - UFRJ ___ atrpms-devel mailing list atrpms-devel@atrpms.net http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-devel
[ATrpms-devel] libbluray-xine-plugin
Axel, libbluray-xine-plugin has to be recretated for libbluray 3.0.5 ... Thanks. -- Paulo Roma Cavalcanti LCG - UFRJ ___ atrpms-devel mailing list atrpms-devel@atrpms.net http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-devel
Re: [ATrpms-devel] atrpms-rpm-config for rhel6
It was using /usr/sbin/depmod.
Although this works on F17, F18, rhel6 still uses /sbin/depmod.
I think this is the wrong line:
macros.atrpms:%__depmod %(echo %{expand:%%__depmod_%{distid}} | grep '^%'
/dev/null echo /usr/sbin/depmod || echo %{expand:%%__depmod_%{distid}})
I am just using the previous macro version on rhel6
(atrpms-rpm-config-201-3.noarch.rpm) ...
Of course, this means you will have to rebuild all kmdls for rhel6 ...
On Fri, May 17, 2013 at 12:50 AM, Axel Thimm axel.th...@atrpms.net wrote:
Hi,
can you point me to the broken package? For el6 it should use
/sbin/depmod, and the macros seem to do so.
Thanks!
On Thu, May 16, 2013 at 11:53:33AM -0300, Paulo Cavalcanti wrote:
Axel,
the new version of the atrpms-rpm-config
sets the wrong requirement (path) for depmod on rhel6 ...
--
Paulo Roma Cavalcanti
LCG - UFRJ
___
atrpms-devel mailing list
atrpms-devel@atrpms.net
http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-devel
--
Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net
___
atrpms-devel mailing list
atrpms-devel@atrpms.net
http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-devel
--
Paulo Roma Cavalcanti
DCC - UFRJ
___
atrpms-devel mailing list
atrpms-devel@atrpms.net
http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-devel
Re: [ATrpms-devel] New mp3splt, audacious and xbmc
both came from fusion: http://people.atrpms.net/~pcavalcanti/srpms/rtmpdump-2.4-0.2.20110811gitc58cfb3e.fc17.src.rpm http://people.atrpms.net/~pcavalcanti/srpms/libshairport-1.2.1-2.20121218git16395d8.fc17.src.rpm However, the real problem is afps-ng, which has a wrong include path in afp.h. I fixed the package: http://people.atrpms.net/~pcavalcanti/srpms/afpfs-ng-0.8.1-9.fc17.4.src.rpm The new afps-ng only affects the building. You do not need to supply it on ATrpms. You can use it only in your building environment, if you prefer... On Fri, May 17, 2013 at 12:54 AM, Axel Thimm axel.th...@atrpms.net wrote: On Tue, Apr 02, 2013 at 12:16:15AM -0300, Paulo Cavalcanti wrote: http://people.atrpms.net/~pcavalcanti/srpms/libmp3splt-0.8.2-12.fc17.src.rpm http://people.atrpms.net/~pcavalcanti/srpms/mp3splt-2.5.2-12.fc17.src.rpm http://people.atrpms.net/~pcavalcanti/srpms/mp3splt-gtk-0.8.2-12.fc17.src.rpm http://people.atrpms.net/~pcavalcanti/srpms/audacious-3.3.4-1.fc17.src.rpm http://people.atrpms.net/~pcavalcanti/srpms/audacious-plugins-3.3.4-1.fc17.src.rpm http://people.atrpms.net/~pcavalcanti/srpms/xbmc-12.1-1.fc17.src.rpm Thanks, all build. but xbmc, there are some missing packages like libshairport-devel and librtmp-devel (the latter is probably rtmpdump-devel I think). -- Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net ___ atrpms-devel mailing list atrpms-devel@atrpms.net http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-devel -- Paulo Roma Cavalcanti DCC - UFRJ ___ atrpms-devel mailing list atrpms-devel@atrpms.net http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-devel
Re: [ATrpms-devel] atrpms-rpm-config for rhel6
The problem was not building, but installing ... The kmdl generated had an explicit dependency on /usr/bin/depmod, at least the one I compiled some time ago. Clearly, this package is also broken, because its size is too small: http://dl.atrpms.net/el6-x86_64/atrpms/stable/nvidia-graphics319.17-kmdl-2.6.32-358.6.1.el6-319.17-155.el6.x86_64.rpm When I try to download it, I get an ERROR 403: Forbidden. Can you recreate it? Thanks. On Fri, May 17, 2013 at 4:35 PM, Axel Thimm axel.th...@atrpms.net wrote: Hi, thanks for the repost - on el6 both depmod and ldconfig are pulled from the proper locations, in the last days I built tons of packages and could not see the issue. There was an issue with f18 builds, but never with el6. Thanks, Axel. On Fri, May 17, 2013 at 10:34:58AM +0100, John Pilkington wrote: Hi Axel: Welcome back. I'm replying to the gossamer-threads version, so no thread. Copy of Stephen Collier's post on users' list, 9 April: The macro on line 79 of /etc/rpm/macros.atrpms doesn't seem to be working properly. Needed for F18 I guess. I have temporary changed it to build with /usr/sbin/ldconfig changed back to /sbin/ldconfig and same for depmod a few lines later. Cheers, John P ___ atrpms-devel mailing list atrpms-devel@atrpms.net http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-devel -- Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net ___ atrpms-devel mailing list atrpms-devel@atrpms.net http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-devel -- Paulo Roma Cavalcanti DCC - UFRJ ___ atrpms-devel mailing list atrpms-devel@atrpms.net http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-devel
Re: [ATrpms-devel] atrpms-rpm-config for rhel6
Only 160 K?? On Fri, May 17, 2013 at 5:32 PM, Axel Thimm axel.th...@atrpms.net wrote: On Fri, May 17, 2013 at 05:23:08PM -0300, Paulo Cavalcanti wrote: The problem was not building, but installing ... The kmdl generated had an explicit dependency on /usr/bin/depmod, at least the one I compiled some time ago. Yes, I did check teh runtime dependencies, we're on the same side here. Perhaps you had this issue on f118 and not el6? On f18 it would create that dependency. Clearly, this package is also broken, because its size is too small: http://dl.atrpms.net/el6-x86_64/atrpms/stable/nvidia-graphics319.17-kmdl-2.6.32-358.6.1.el6-319.17-155.el6.x86_64.rpm When I try to download it, I get an ERROR 403: Forbidden. Can you recreate it? Thanks. That's another issue - the package is there and looks ok, but the permissions are off. Hm, I need to check the scripts. Thanks!! On Fri, May 17, 2013 at 4:35 PM, Axel Thimm axel.th...@atrpms.net wrote: Hi, thanks for the repost - on el6 both depmod and ldconfig are pulled from the proper locations, in the last days I built tons of packages and could not see the issue. There was an issue with f18 builds, but never with el6. Thanks, Axel. On Fri, May 17, 2013 at 10:34:58AM +0100, John Pilkington wrote: Hi Axel: Welcome back. I'm replying to the gossamer-threads version, so no thread. Copy of Stephen Collier's post on users' list, 9 April: The macro on line 79 of /etc/rpm/macros.atrpms doesn't seem to be working properly. Needed for F18 I guess. I have temporary changed it to build with /usr/sbin/ldconfig changed back to /sbin/ldconfig and same for depmod a few lines later. Cheers, John P ___ atrpms-devel mailing list atrpms-devel@atrpms.net http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-devel -- Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net ___ atrpms-devel mailing list atrpms-devel@atrpms.net http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-devel -- Paulo Roma Cavalcanti DCC - UFRJ ___ atrpms-devel mailing list atrpms-devel@atrpms.net http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-devel -- Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net ___ atrpms-devel mailing list atrpms-devel@atrpms.net http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-devel -- Paulo Roma Cavalcanti DCC - UFRJ ___ atrpms-devel mailing list atrpms-devel@atrpms.net http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-devel
[ATrpms-devel] atrpms-rpm-config for rhel6
Axel, the new version of the atrpms-rpm-config sets the wrong requirement (path) for depmod on rhel6 ... -- Paulo Roma Cavalcanti LCG - UFRJ ___ atrpms-devel mailing list atrpms-devel@atrpms.net http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-devel
[ATrpms-devel] vlc 2.0.6 and libdvdcss 1.2.13
http://people.atrpms.net/~pcavalcanti/srpms/vlc-2.0.6-6.fc17.src.rpm http://people.atrpms.net/~pcavalcanti/srpms/libdvdcss-1.2.13-7.fc17.src.rpm -- Paulo Roma Cavalcanti LCG - UFRJ ___ atrpms-devel mailing list atrpms-devel@atrpms.net http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-devel
[ATrpms-devel] nvidia driver does not compile for kernel 3.7.3 - fix
Simpler fix: cd /usr/src/kernels/3.7.9-101.fc17.x86_64/include/linux ln -s ../generated/uapi/linux/version.h . Compile normally, then ... latest stable version: http://people.atrpms.net/~pcavalcanti/srpms/nvidia-graphics310.32-310.32-154.fc17.src.rpm Thanks. -- Paulo Roma Cavalcanti LCG - UFRJ ___ atrpms-devel mailing list atrpms-devel@atrpms.net http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-devel
Re: [ATrpms-devel] Let's update some packages?
On Fri, Feb 8, 2013 at 12:42 PM, Paulo Cavalcanti pro...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 12:01 AM, Paulo Cavalcanti pro...@gmail.comwrote: On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 10:15 PM, Paulo Cavalcanti pro...@gmail.comwrote: On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 3:18 PM, Axel Thimm axel.th...@atrpms.netwrote: Hi Paulo, of course I'd love any help!!! :) Thanks!!! On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 07:31:34AM -0200, Paulo Cavalcanti wrote: I think these packages are OK: http://people.atrpms.net/~pcavalcanti/srpms/x264-0.129-18_20130129.2245.fc17.src.rpm http://people.atrpms.net/~pcavalcanti/srpms/ffmpeg-0.10.6-55.fc17.src.rpm http://people.atrpms.net/~pcavalcanti/srpms/mplayer-1.0-91_snap20130130.fc17.src.rpm However, ffmpeg is currently in version 1.1.1 !! The last one ... http://people.atrpms.net/~pcavalcanti/srpms/nvidia-graphics310.32-310.32-154.fc17.src.rpm FFmeg 1.1.2: http://people.atrpms.net/~pcavalcanti/srpms/ffmpeg-1.1.2-56.fc17.src.rpm Mpd for Fedora: http://people.atrpms.net/~pcavalcanti/srpms/mpd-0.17.3-26.fc17.src.rpm -- Paulo Roma Cavalcanti LCG - UFRJ ___ atrpms-devel mailing list atrpms-devel@atrpms.net http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-devel
Re: [ATrpms-devel] Let's update some packages?
On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 12:01 AM, Paulo Cavalcanti pro...@gmail.com wrote: On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 10:15 PM, Paulo Cavalcanti pro...@gmail.comwrote: On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 3:18 PM, Axel Thimm axel.th...@atrpms.netwrote: Hi Paulo, of course I'd love any help!!! :) Thanks!!! On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 07:31:34AM -0200, Paulo Cavalcanti wrote: I think these packages are OK: http://people.atrpms.net/~pcavalcanti/srpms/x264-0.129-18_20130129.2245.fc17.src.rpm http://people.atrpms.net/~pcavalcanti/srpms/ffmpeg-0.10.6-55.fc17.src.rpm http://people.atrpms.net/~pcavalcanti/srpms/mplayer-1.0-91_snap20130130.fc17.src.rpm However, ffmpeg is currently in version 1.1.1 !! The last one ... http://people.atrpms.net/~pcavalcanti/srpms/nvidia-graphics310.32-310.32-154.fc17.src.rpm FFmeg 1.1.2: http://people.atrpms.net/~pcavalcanti/srpms/ffmpeg-1.1.2-56.fc17.src.rpm -- Paulo Roma Cavalcanti LCG - UFRJ ___ atrpms-devel mailing list atrpms-devel@atrpms.net http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-devel
Re: [ATrpms-devel] [ATrpms-users] Building nvidia 310 driver for Fedora 16 x86_64
On Wed, Dec 5, 2012 at 11:08 PM, George Galt george.g...@gmail.com wrote: Paulo: I get a conflict with: Transaction Check Error: file /usr/bin/nvidia-cuda-proxy-control from install of nvidia-graphics310.19-310.19-151.fc16.x86_64 conflicts with file from package nvidia-graphics304.51-304.51-149.fc16.x86_64 file /usr/bin/nvidia-cuda-proxy-server from install of nvidia-graphics310.19-310.19-151.fc16.x86_64 conflicts with file from package nvidia-graphics304.51-304.51-149.fc16.x86_64 I got the same error when I tried to install the 304.64 driver (I'm on the 304.51 driver). I believe that the 304.51 driver introduced these files (they weren't in the 302 driver). What is the appropriate way to handle this? I'm sure I could simply ignore the error, but for those who want a clean install (or to leave legacy drivers installed in case they need to return to them), we might want to fix this issue too. Sorry to be a PITA! This was happening before. nvidia-cuda-proxy-control is a new file, which appeared in the 300 series. Since it is unversioned, and the previous package is not being removed, the conflict appears. We can either supply it in a separate package, or just filter it as we did with libnvcuvid.so In the next package, I will deal with this issue. For now, just use sudo rpm -Uvh --force -- Paulo Roma Cavalcanti LCG - UFRJ ___ atrpms-devel mailing list atrpms-devel@atrpms.net http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-devel
Re: [ATrpms-devel] [ATrpms-users] Building nvidia 310 driver for Fedora 16 x86_64
On Wed, Dec 5, 2012 at 6:15 PM, George Galt george.g...@gmail.com wrote:
Well, I've tried to follow the instructions on the Packaging Guidelines,
but it doesn't seem to have worked for me. I'm reasonable new to RPM
packaging, so I might be missing something.
I've added
%filter_from_requires '/libnvcuvid.so()(64bit)/d'
after the lines
Requires(post): nvidia-graphics-helpers
%kmdl nvidia-graphics%{version}
%kmdl_parentdependencies
Well, it does work:
#Requires: python2, pyxf86config = 0.3.5
Requires(post): nvidia-graphics-helpers
%{?filter_setup:
%filter_from_requires /^libnvcuvid\.so/d;
%filter_setup
}
%kmdl nvidia-graphics%{version}
%kmdl_parentdependencies
..
I can upload a new .src.rpm, if you want.
--
Paulo Roma Cavalcanti
DCC - UFRJ
___
atrpms-devel mailing list
atrpms-devel@atrpms.net
http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-devel
Re: [ATrpms-devel] Lots of packages to be rebuilt, including vlc 2.0.4
On Fri, Oct 26, 2012 at 4:03 PM, Axel Thimm axel.th...@atrpms.net wrote:
Thanks, see comments inline.
On Sun, Oct 21, 2012 at 01:30:11PM -0200, Paulo Cavalcanti wrote:
http://people.atrpms.net/~pcavalcanti/srpms/vlc-2.0.4-4.fc17.src.rpm
I'm rebuilding your new packages that you sent in the next mail.
http://people.atrpms.net/~pcavalcanti/srpms/CGAL-4.0.2-1.fc17.src.rpm(requires
a newer cmake on rhel)
http://people.atrpms.net/~pcavalcanti/srpms/cmake-2.8.8-4.fc17.src.rpm
http://people.atrpms.net/~pcavalcanti/srpms/xine-ui-0.99.7-1.fc14.src.rpm(for
rhel6)
Fails on rhel6 (and rhel5 BTW) with a dependency on libjpeg-turbo-devel.
This is because you built the wrong package:
http://people.atrpms.net/~pcavalcanti/srpms/xine-ui-0.99.7-2.fc17.src.rpm
Note the 2 instead of the 1 of the original link.
I have both in my atrpms area, but the version
0.99.7-1 does not depend on libjpeg-turbo ...
http://people.atrpms.net/~pcavalcanti/srpms/gnump3d-3.0-5.fc17.src.rpm
Fails on all platforms with
File must begin with /: %{_unitdir}/gnump3d.service
Is _unitdir some new rpm variable set for systemd? It failed on f17 as
well, what package is providing that macro?
Yes it is:
macros.systemd:%_unitdir /usr/lib/systemd/system
It comes in systemd-44-20.fc17.x86_64.
And F18 is using another set of more powerful macros. Really funny ...
By the way, what do you prefer, having two different
packages one for systemd (F16 and above)
an a different one for rhel, or a single package with a bunch of
conditional statements?
gnump3d should have stayed in version 3.0.4 for rhel, because the new
package uses systemd only.
http://people.atrpms.net/~pcavalcanti/srpms/normalize-0.7.7-4.fc17.src.rpm
http://people.atrpms.net/~pcavalcanti/srpms/smplayer-0.8.1-6.fc17.src.rpm
http://people.atrpms.net/~pcavalcanti/srpms/smtube-1.2.1-1.fc17.src.rpm
http://people.atrpms.net/~pcavalcanti/srpms/povray-3.7.0.RC6-1.fc17.src.rpm
http://people.atrpms.net/~pcavalcanti/srpms/mp3splt-2.4.3-11.fc17.src.rpm
http://people.atrpms.net/~pcavalcanti/srpms/libmp3splt-0.7.3-11.fc17.src.rpm
http://people.atrpms.net/~pcavalcanti/srpms/mp3splt-gtk-0.7.3-11.fc14.src.rpm
Fails for el6, but I think it dod for a while. I'll pull el6 off the
builds.
http://people.atrpms.net/~pcavalcanti/srpms/nvidia-graphics304.51-304.51-148.fc17.src.rpm(your
attempt to build 304 has failed).
The package works fine, but it has two new unversioned files:
%{_bindir}/nvidia-cuda-proxy-control
%{_bindir}/nvidia-cuda-proxy-server
Therefore, when upgrading to a newer version
they will conflict, and one must force the installation.
On the other hand, if one just removes
nvidia-graphics304.51-304.51-149.fc17.x86_64 before hand, then the obsolete
clause is not written in /etc/modprobe.d/nvidia.conf
I do not know what is the best way to solve this issue ... (maybe excluding
these files??).
For F16 and above only:
http://people.atrpms.net/~pcavalcanti/srpms/mpd-0.17.2-25.fc17.src.rpm
http://people.atrpms.net/~pcavalcanti/srpms/audacious-3.3.2-1.fc17.src.rpm
http://people.atrpms.net/~pcavalcanti/srpms/audacious-plugins-3.3.2-1.fc17.src.rpm
No more el6 for audacious due to gtk3. :/
--
Rhel, F14 and below must stay with audacious 2.4
forever ...
--
Paulo Roma Cavalcanti
LCG - UFRJ
___
atrpms-devel mailing list
atrpms-devel@atrpms.net
http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-devel
Re: [ATrpms-devel] Old nvidia packages do not compile on kernel 3.6.1
On Fri, Oct 12, 2012 at 10:18 AM, Paulo Cavalcanti pro...@gmail.com wrote: I was only able to compile the latest nvidia blob with kernel 3.6.1: http://people.atrpms.net/~pcavalcanti/srpms/nvidia-graphics304.51-304.51-148.fc17.src.rpm I had to make some small changes in the spec file, at least to build on my system. Let me explain this issue better. In my case, the nvidia-settings-304.51.desktop was not being installed. I had to force the installation and fix the paths in the desktop file (I have just uploaded a fixed version of the .src.rpm). -- Paulo Roma Cavalcanti DCC - UFRJ ___ atrpms-devel mailing list atrpms-devel@atrpms.net http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-devel
Re: [ATrpms-devel] Old nvidia packages do not compile on kernel 3.6.1
On Fri, Oct 12, 2012 at 11:17 AM, Paulo Cavalcanti pro...@gmail.com wrote: On Fri, Oct 12, 2012 at 10:18 AM, Paulo Cavalcanti pro...@gmail.comwrote: I was only able to compile the latest nvidia blob with kernel 3.6.1: http://people.atrpms.net/~pcavalcanti/srpms/nvidia-graphics304.51-304.51-148.fc17.src.rpm I had to make some small changes in the spec file, at least to build on my system. Let me explain this issue better. In my case, the nvidia-settings-304.51.desktop was not being installed. I had to force the installation and fix the paths in the desktop file (I have just uploaded a fixed version of the .src.rpm). The packages are available here for F17: http://orion.lcg.ufrj.br/RPMS/myrpms-f17-x86_64/nvidia/nvidia-graphics304.51/ -- Paulo Roma Cavalcanti DCC - UFRJ ___ atrpms-devel mailing list atrpms-devel@atrpms.net http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-devel
[ATrpms-devel] smtube available
This is a youtube browser for smplayer: http://people.atrpms.net/~pcavalcanti/srpms/smtube-1.2.1-1.fc17.src.rpm Thanks. -- Paulo Roma Cavalcanti LCG - UFRJ ___ atrpms-devel mailing list atrpms-devel@atrpms.net http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-devel
[ATrpms-devel] New atool, normalize and audacious
http://people.atrpms.net/~pcavalcanti/srpms/atool-0.39.0-5.fc17.src.rpm Package normalize has to be rebuilt because it is precluding updating perl in F17: http://people.atrpms.net/~pcavalcanti/srpms/normalize-0.7.7-4.fc17.src.rpm Audacious 3 was updated to 3.3.2: http://people.atrpms.net/~pcavalcanti/srpms/audacious-3.3.2-1.fc17.src.rpm http://people.atrpms.net/~pcavalcanti/srpms/audacious-plugins-3.3.2-1.fc17.src.rpm Thanks. -- Paulo Roma Cavalcanti LCG - UFRJ ___ atrpms-devel mailing list atrpms-devel@atrpms.net http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-devel
[ATrpms-devel] libmatroska too old ...
Hi, Axel libmatroska in ATrpms is too old. Fedora 17 uses version 1.3.0 and epel 1.2.0. Can you update libmatroska to a newer version on rhel6 and rebuild vlc? Thanks. -- Paulo Roma Cavalcanti LCG - UFRJ ___ atrpms-devel mailing list atrpms-devel@atrpms.net http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-devel
[ATrpms-devel] Packages missing/outdated
This is the list of packages that should be rebuilt: http://people.atrpms.net/~pcavalcanti/srpms/kradio4-4.0.6-1.fc17.src.rpm http://people.atrpms.net/~pcavalcanti/srpms/vlc-2.0.3-3.fc17.src.rpm http://people.atrpms.net/~pcavalcanti/srpms/audacious-3.2.4-2.fc17.src.rpm http://people.atrpms.net/~pcavalcanti/srpms/audacious-plugins-3.2.4-2.fc17.src.rpm http://people.atrpms.net/~pcavalcanti/srpms/mpg123-1.14.4-1.fc17.src.rpm http://people.atrpms.net/~pcavalcanti/srpms/freepops-0.2.9-10.fc17.src.rpm - This version of mpd uses the new service manager, and will only work for F16 and F17: http://people.atrpms.net/~pcavalcanti/srpms/mpd-0.17-24.fc17.src.rpm This version of noip also uses the new service manager, but there is an option --without service for rhel6: http://people.atrpms.net/~pcavalcanti/srpms/noip-2.1.9-9.fc17.src.rpm -- Paulo Roma Cavalcanti LCG - UFRJ ___ atrpms-devel mailing list atrpms-devel@atrpms.net http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-devel
[ATrpms-devel] Packages updated for f17
http://people.atrpms.net/~pcavalcanti/srpms/viridian-1.2-2.fc17.src.rpm http://people.atrpms.net/~pcavalcanti/srpms/ampache-3.6-alpha1.1.fc17.src.rpm http://people.atrpms.net/~pcavalcanti/srpms/kradio4-4.0.5-2.fc14.src.rpm Thanks. -- Paulo Roma Cavalcanti DCC - UFRJ ___ atrpms-devel mailing list atrpms-devel@atrpms.net http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-devel
Re: [ATrpms-devel] Packages updated for f17
On Fri, Jul 13, 2012 at 8:28 AM, Paulo Cavalcanti pro...@gmail.com wrote: http://people.atrpms.net/~pcavalcanti/srpms/viridian-1.2-2.fc17.src.rpm http://people.atrpms.net/~pcavalcanti/srpms/ampache-3.6-alpha1.1.fc17.src.rpm http://people.atrpms.net/~pcavalcanti/srpms/kradio4-4.0.5-2.fc14.src.rpm Thanks. Sorry, two small changes. I forgot to increase viridian release number: http://people.atrpms.net/~pcavalcanti/srpms/viridian-1.2-3.fc17.src.rpm and I got tired of having /usr/share/vlc/lua/http/.hosts overridden at each update: http://people.atrpms.net/~pcavalcanti/srpms/vlc-2.0.2-3.fc17.src.rpm Thanks. -- Paulo Roma Cavalcanti LCG - UFRJ ___ atrpms-devel mailing list atrpms-devel@atrpms.net http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-devel
Re: [ATrpms-devel] Anyone using F17?
On Sat, Jun 30, 2012 at 3:59 PM, Paulo Cavalcanti pro...@gmail.com wrote: On Sat, Jun 30, 2012 at 1:27 PM, Brian Long briandl...@gmail.com wrote: When CentOS 5 was getting long in the tooth, I upgraded my backend to Fedora 16 and I regret doing so. I should have stuck with SL 6. I've not played with F17 on my workstation since I prefer the enterprise releases. /Brian/ On Sat, Jun 30, 2012 at 8:09 AM, Paulo Cavalcanti pro...@gmail.comwrote: Hi, after sometime trying to use F17, I know of some nasty problems lurking around: 1) applications using gtk2 may crash (e.g., vlc) 2) libpng 1.5 hide some structures from applications, and the compilation fails (e.,g. povray) 3) module-init-tools is gone (deprecated by kmod), and all kmdls do not install I can stay with F14/rhel6 for a long time or we can try to fix whatever we can. Is anybody really using F17 in ATrpms? I just installed F17 on a brand new I7 computer. I have the old computer (with F14) and the new one side by side, and just switch between them in the monitor source (fortunately it has two outputs: a dvi and a vga). Gnome 3 is really awkward, and systemd, well, it is better not to say what I thought of it kde seems the same to me, and I think it is time to forget about gnome ... Gnome3 seems as a big iphone to me, but lacking the Apple product polishing and the appropriate hardware. Every tweak takes a long time, mainly because the configuration tools are not installed by default or simply do not exist ... Anyway, I was able to force the installation of the nvidia kmdl and had to install pyxf86config-0.3.37-10.fc15.x86_64.rpm from F16, because it is gone on F17. Then I blacklisted nouveau in /etc/default/grub and recreated the grub2 config file. Well, at least I am using the nvidia driver now and google-earth is at full power again. To fix the kmod dependency is quite simple. One has only to edit the file /etc/rpm/macros.kmdl and change: Requires: /sbin/depmod, modutils = 2.4.14\ for Requires: /sbin/depmod, kmod = 7\ That is it. Rebuilt kmdls will install just fine... -- Paulo Roma Cavalcanti DCC - UFRJ ___ atrpms-devel mailing list atrpms-devel@atrpms.net http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-devel
[ATrpms-devel] Anyone using F17?
Hi, after sometime trying to use F17, I know of some nasty problems lurking around: 1) applications using gtk2 may crash (e.g., vlc) 2) libpng 1.5 hide some structures from applications, and the compilation fails (e.,g. povray) 3) module-init-tools is gone (deprecated by kmod), and all kmdls do not install I can stay with F14/rhel6 for a long time or we can try to fix whatever we can. Is anybody really using F17 in ATrpms? -- Paulo Roma Cavalcanti LCG - UFRJ ___ atrpms-devel mailing list atrpms-devel@atrpms.net http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-devel
Re: [ATrpms-devel] Anyone using F17?
On Sat, Jun 30, 2012 at 1:27 PM, Brian Long briandl...@gmail.com wrote: When CentOS 5 was getting long in the tooth, I upgraded my backend to Fedora 16 and I regret doing so. I should have stuck with SL 6. I've not played with F17 on my workstation since I prefer the enterprise releases. /Brian/ On Sat, Jun 30, 2012 at 8:09 AM, Paulo Cavalcanti pro...@gmail.comwrote: Hi, after sometime trying to use F17, I know of some nasty problems lurking around: 1) applications using gtk2 may crash (e.g., vlc) 2) libpng 1.5 hide some structures from applications, and the compilation fails (e.,g. povray) 3) module-init-tools is gone (deprecated by kmod), and all kmdls do not install I can stay with F14/rhel6 for a long time or we can try to fix whatever we can. Is anybody really using F17 in ATrpms? I just installed F17 on a brand new I7 computer. I have the old computer (with F14) and the new one side by side, and just switch between them in the monitor source (fortunately it has two outputs: a dvi and a vga). Gnome 3 is really awkward, and systemd, well, it is better not to say what I thought of it kde seems the same to me, and I think it is time to forget about gnome ... Gnome3 seems as a big iphone to me, but lacking the Apple product polishing and the appropriate hardware. Every tweak takes a long time, mainly because the configuration tools are not installed by default or simply do not exist ... Anyway, I was able to force the installation of the nvidia kmdl and had to install pyxf86config-0.3.37-10.fc15.x86_64.rpm from F16, because it is gone on F17. Then I blacklisted nouveau in /etc/default/grub and recreated the grub2 config file. Well, at least I am using the nvidia driver now and google-earth is at full power again. -- Paulo Roma Cavalcanti LCG - UFRJ ___ atrpms-devel mailing list atrpms-devel@atrpms.net http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-devel
[ATrpms-devel] audacious 3.2.3 working for F17
http://people.atrpms.net/~pcavalcanti/srpms/audacious-3.2.3-1.fc17.src.rpm http://people.atrpms.net/~pcavalcanti/srpms/audacious-plugins-3.2.3-1.fc14.src.rpm This version uses gtk3 by default ... Thanks. -- Paulo Roma Cavalcanti LCG - UFRJ ___ atrpms-devel mailing list atrpms-devel@atrpms.net http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-devel
[ATrpms-devel] xine-lib 1.1.21
http://people.atrpms.net/~pcavalcanti/srpms/xine-lib-1.1.21-24.fc17.src.rpm -- Paulo Roma Cavalcanti LCG - UFRJ ___ atrpms-devel mailing list atrpms-devel@atrpms.net http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-devel
Re: [ATrpms-devel] New mpg123 and mp3splt suite
On Thu, Jun 7, 2012 at 7:38 AM, Paulo Cavalcanti pro...@gmail.com wrote: http://people.atrpms.net/~pcavalcanti/srpms/libmp3splt-0.7.2-10.fc14.src.rpm http://people.atrpms.net/~pcavalcanti/srpms/mp3splt-2.4.2-10.fc14.src.rpm http://people.atrpms.net/~pcavalcanti/srpms/mp3splt-gtk-0.7.2-10.fc14.src.rpm http://people.atrpms.net/~pcavalcanti/srpms/mpg123-1.14.2-1.fc14.src.rpm Thanks. Hi, I needed to patch for rhel6, because its gtk2 was too old. When using search in the freedb tab, the busy spinning wheel will not show up in rhel6. This is the only difference ... http://people.atrpms.net/~pcavalcanti/srpms/mp3splt-gtk-0.7.2-10.el6.src.rpm Thanks. -- Paulo Roma Cavalcanti DCC - UFRJ ___ atrpms-devel mailing list atrpms-devel@atrpms.net http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-devel
[ATrpms-devel] audacious 3.2.2 with lirc plugin back
Hi, I back ported lirc plugin to audacious 3.2.2: http://people.atrpms.net/~pcavalcanti/srpms/audacious-3.2.2-1.fc14.src.rpm http://people.atrpms.net/~pcavalcanti/srpms/audacious-plugins-3.2.2-1.fc14.src.rpm This plugin has been missing in all 3.0 series and should be back in 3.3, which probably will not build on rhel any more. Therefore, my patch is the solution for now (it is tested and working). There is also: http://people.atrpms.net/~pcavalcanti/srpms/libbluray-0.2.2-2.fc14.src.rpm -- Paulo Roma Cavalcanti LCG - UFRJ ___ atrpms-devel mailing list atrpms-devel@atrpms.net http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-devel
Re: [ATrpms-devel] vlc 2.0.1
In fact, upgrading my videolinux drivers to today snapshot made my digital tv work again with vlc 2.0.1: http://people.atrpms.net/~pcavalcanti/srpms/video4linux-20120321_295cfcf-100.fc14.src.rpm -- Paulo Roma Cavalcanti LCG - UFRJ ___ atrpms-devel mailing list atrpms-devel@atrpms.net http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-devel
Re: [ATrpms-devel] vlc 2.0.1
On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 3:56 PM, Paulo Cavalcanti pro...@gmail.com wrote:
This is vlc 2.0.1 (I had to patch it):
http://people.atrpms.net/~pcavalcanti/srpms/vlc-2.0.1-2.fc14.src.rpm
There is also a new ffmpeg, if you want:
http://people.atrpms.net/~pcavalcanti/srpms/ffmpeg-0.10.2-54.fc14.src.rpm
Well,
I am still seeing the two main bugs, as before:
1) DBV-T (ISDB-T in my case) freezes vlc and
renders my usb capture device unusable, which forces me to reboot, to be
able to use the device again.
2) vdpau-video installed causes most videos to stutter.
I ended up rebuilding vlc-1.1.13 relocatable
and installing it in /usr/local. This way, I can
either use vlc 1.1.13 or 2.0.1. I just needed to write a bash script vlc.sh
to add /usr/local first in LD_LIBRARY path and then call vlc 1.1.13:
#!/bin/sh
export LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/usr/local/${ARCH_LIBDIR}:$LD_LIBRARY_PATH
pldir=$HOME
binary=/usr/local/bin/vlc
#export MALLOC_CHECK_=0
# Exports LANG to force ISO-8859-1 char code
# for m3u files and playlists.
# export LANG=en_US
# IFS=
if [ -x $binary ]
then
cd $pldir
$binary $@
else
echo Couldn't execute $binary!
fi
--
Paulo Roma Cavalcanti
LCG - UFRJ
___
atrpms-devel mailing list
atrpms-devel@atrpms.net
http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-devel
Re: [ATrpms-devel] About xine-lib 1.2.1
On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 8:26 AM, Axel Thimm axel.th...@atrpms.net wrote: On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 07:29:31AM -0300, Paulo Cavalcanti wrote: I built xine-lib 1.2.1: http://people.atrpms.net/~pcavalcanti/srpms/xine-lib-1.2.1-1.fc14.src.rpm However, kde is linked against libxine.so.1(), from the previous 1.1 xine-lib series. To supply a compatibility package would be a solution, but there are also several plugins to be taken into account. I did not test this new xine-lib package, but maybe someone else is interested in doing it. I tried to build it for all dists the previous xine-lib built - it fails for F15 and EL5. The successful builds are under bleeding. It seems that you removed xine-lib 1.20.1 from F16 and F15 stable. Can you bring them back? xine-lib 1.2 offers new goodies, such as vdpau support, but it really has to be in bleeding for quite some time. We are experiencing a lot of multimedia updates: gstreamer went to 0.11 vlc to 2.0 xine to 1.2 mpg123 to 1.14 We have to be extra careful not to break anything. vlc 2.0, for instance, has some problems, which demand for another release as soon as it is available. I am trying to update everything to the last stable release, so we can test the new stuff thoroughly. Thanks. -- Paulo Roma Cavalcanti LCG - UFRJ ___ atrpms-devel mailing list atrpms-devel@atrpms.net http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-devel
[ATrpms-devel] vlc 2.0.1
This is vlc 2.0.1 (I had to patch it): http://people.atrpms.net/~pcavalcanti/srpms/vlc-2.0.1-2.fc14.src.rpm There is also a new ffmpeg, if you want: http://people.atrpms.net/~pcavalcanti/srpms/ffmpeg-0.10.2-54.fc14.src.rpm Thanks. -- Paulo Roma Cavalcanti LCG - UFRJ ___ atrpms-devel mailing list atrpms-devel@atrpms.net http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-devel
Re: [ATrpms-devel] alsa-lib 1.0.24 and rhel6
On Sat, Mar 10, 2012 at 6:12 PM, Axel Thimm axel.th...@atrpms.net wrote: On Thu, Mar 08, 2012 at 06:04:11AM -0300, Paulo Cavalcanti wrote: On Thu, Mar 8, 2012 at 4:17 AM, Axel Thimm axel.th...@atrpms.net wrote: Hi, On Sun, Mar 04, 2012 at 11:39:02AM -0300, Paulo Cavalcanti wrote: Just for the records... installing alsa-lib 1.0.24 on rhel6 breaks flash plugin pulse support. BTW, what about 1.0.25? Is there an alsa-lib 1.0.25 in ATrpms? I am using alsa-driver 1.0.25 on rhel6, but the problem is alsa-lib, not alsa-driver... Alsa-lib 1.0.24 was a no go regarding flash support. -- Paulo Roma Cavalcanti LCG - UFRJ ___ atrpms-devel mailing list atrpms-devel@atrpms.net http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-devel
[ATrpms-devel] ffmpeg 0.10-54 on rhel6
Hi, Axel the new ffmpeg for rhel6 has been linked against libvpx 1.0, which is on testing ... -- Paulo Roma Cavalcanti LCG - UFRJ ___ atrpms-devel mailing list atrpms-devel@atrpms.net http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-devel
[ATrpms-devel] vlc plugin
Hi, Axel this is the new vlc plugin for firefox: http://people.atrpms.net/~pcavalcanti/srpms/npapi-vlc-2.0.0-0.1gita721049.fc12.src.rpm It is working fine with firefox 10.0.1 (my F12 runs firefox from rhel6). Some people have emailed me about the missing plugin, so here it is. And what about vlc for F15? It is no there ... still having problems? Thanks. -- Paulo Roma Cavalcanti LCG - UFRJ ___ atrpms-devel mailing list atrpms-devel@atrpms.net http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-devel
[ATrpms-devel] alsa-lib 1.0.24 and rhel6
Just for the records... installing alsa-lib 1.0.24 on rhel6 breaks flash plugin pulse support. Therefore, using flash via firefox or chrome precludes any other application of gaining control of the sound card. I have been struggling with this problem for a long time, and the only solution is reinstalling the original alsa-lib 1.0.22 from RedHat. -- Paulo Roma Cavalcanti LCG - UFRJ ___ atrpms-devel mailing list atrpms-devel@atrpms.net http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-devel
Re: [ATrpms-devel] vlc 2.0
On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 2:22 PM, Andy andy-nnt...@linuxtech.net wrote: Paulo Cavalcanti wrote: No more mozilla plugin, as far as I know. It's in a separate tarball now: http://download.videolan.org/pub/videolan/vlc/2.0.0/npapi-vlc-2.0.0.tar.xz Therefore, on rhel 6, one should use: --without opencv --without xcb xcb is pretty crucial for X video playback, without it vlc is video playback is severely limited. Instead the solution I used is including xcb-1.7 statically, which seems to work fine. See here for my spec-file: http://pkgrepo.linuxtech.net/el6/testing/spec-files/vlc.spec And the source rpm: http://pkgrepo.linuxtech.net/el6/testing/source/vlc-2.0.0-2.el6.src.rpm The binary rpms are under: http://pkgrepo.linuxtech.net/el6/testing/i686/ http://pkgrepo.linuxtech.net/el6/testing/x86_64/ I upgraded libxcb to 1.7 in rhel6 and F12 and so far so good (sonames are the same). Fedora rules are against static links, but on the other I am upgrading a core package. Everything is working just fine. This is what I am using now: http://people.atrpms.net/~pcavalcanti/srpms/vlc-2.0.0-1.el6.src.rpm http://people.atrpms.net/~pcavalcanti/srpms/live-2012.02.04-1.fc12.src.rpm http://people.atrpms.net/~pcavalcanti/srpms/libbluray-0.2.1-1.fc14.src.rpm http://people.atrpms.net/~pcavalcanti/srpms/libxcb-1.7-1.fc14.src.rpm According to my tests, only dvb-t is broken. The rest is working as expected. As you can see, I tested it on old systems, but not on rhel5 yet... -- Paulo Roma Cavalcanti LCG - UFRJ ___ atrpms-devel mailing list atrpms-devel@atrpms.net http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-devel
Re: [ATrpms-devel] vlc 2.0
On Thu, Mar 1, 2012 at 1:49 AM, Arnaldo Russo andy-nnt...@linuxtech.netwrote: Paulo Cavalcanti wrote: I upgraded libxcb to 1.7 in rhel6 and F12 and so far so good (sonames are the same). Fedora rules are against static links, but on the other I am upgrading a core package. Yes, that's exactly the reason why I chose to include xcb statically in vlc 2.0, I think upgrading a core RHEL library like xcb is quite risky and far less desireable than breaking the no-static-libs rule. Maybe if we change the test for the minimum libxcb from 1.6 to 1.5 nothing will change. This is the changelog for libxcb: http://sources.gentoo.org/cgi-bin/viewvc.cgi/gentoo-x86/x11-libs/libxcb/ChangeLog?view=markup I see only bug fixes... Even if we build using 1.7, vlc installs on systems with 1.5, because there is no difference whatsoever in the sonames. -- Paulo Roma Cavalcanti LCG - UFRJ ___ atrpms-devel mailing list atrpms-devel@atrpms.net http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-devel
[ATrpms-devel] libbluray 0.2.1
http://people.atrpms.net/~pcavalcanti/srpms/libbluray-0.2.1-1.fc14.src.rpm -- Paulo Roma Cavalcanti LCG - UFRJ ___ atrpms-devel mailing list atrpms-devel@atrpms.net http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-devel
[ATrpms-devel] kradio4 4.0.3 available
This version is fixed a lot of issues ... http://people.atrpms.net/~pcavalcanti/srpms/kradio4-4.0.3-1.fc14.src.rpm Thanks. -- Paulo Roma Cavalcanti LCG - UFRJ ___ atrpms-devel mailing list atrpms-devel@atrpms.net http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-devel
Re: [ATrpms-devel] Packages absent in your last build
On Sun, Feb 12, 2012 at 7:52 AM, Axel Thimm axel.th...@atrpms.net wrote: Hi, On Fri, Jan 27, 2012 at 08:14:35AM -0200, Paulo Cavalcanti wrote: I noticed that ampache is missing in F15 and F16, and probably you forgot to activate it, because it was missing since the beginning of these fedora releases. audacious-plugins is missing in rhel6. mp3splt-gtk is missing in F15 and F16, and they build fine here. Since F15 and F16 possess a working gtk3, I just built mp3splt-gtk with no special option, because the defaults are fine in this case. avidemux is missing in F16 (built fine here). kradio4 is missing in rhel6 (built fine here). This is an updated version I submitted some time ago: http://people.atrpms.net/~pcavalcanti/srpms/kradio4-4.0.2.1-2.fc14.src.rpm but 4.0.3 should be out soon, and if you wish it can be built only in rhel6 (the other releases can wait for 4.0.3). I fixed almost all of these, if a package is still missing it didn't build on that distribution. :/ -- mp3splt-gtk is missing on F15 and F16, but they build fine with the default options. Can you check what was the problem? Thanks. -- Paulo Roma Cavalcanti LCG - UFRJ ___ atrpms-devel mailing list atrpms-devel@atrpms.net http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-devel
[ATrpms-devel] How to report rhel6 kernel bugs?
Hi, Axel this new rhel6 kernel 220 series just broke the radio of my capture card. It simply does not tune any station any more, but TV is still working. The last working kernel was 2.6.32-131.21.1.el6.x86_64 I tried to install video4linux, but it did not help. Is there a place to report bugs, even without paying for a rhel6 subscription? Thanks. -- Paulo Roma Cavalcanti LCG - UFRJ ___ atrpms-devel mailing list atrpms-devel@atrpms.net http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-devel
[ATrpms-devel] Packages absent in your last build
Hi, Axel I noticed that ampache is missing in F15 and F16, and probably you forgot to activate it, because it was missing since the beginning of these fedora releases. audacious-plugins is missing in rhel6. mp3splt-gtk is missing in F15 and F16, and they build fine here. Since F15 and F16 possess a working gtk3, I just built mp3splt-gtk with no special option, because the defaults are fine in this case. avidemux is missing in F16 (built fine here). kradio4 is missing in rhel6 (built fine here). This is an updated version I submitted some time ago: http://people.atrpms.net/~pcavalcanti/srpms/kradio4-4.0.2.1-2.fc14.src.rpm but 4.0.3 should be out soon, and if you wish it can be built only in rhel6 (the other releases can wait for 4.0.3). Thanks. -- Paulo Roma Cavalcanti LCG - UFRJ ___ atrpms-devel mailing list atrpms-devel@atrpms.net http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-devel
[ATrpms-devel] /usr/lib/rpm/atrpms/find-unamer.sh: No such file or directory
It seems that atrpms-rpm-config-196-1.noarch is missing something ... -- Paulo Roma Cavalcanti LCG - UFRJ ___ atrpms-devel mailing list atrpms-devel@atrpms.net http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-devel
[ATrpms-devel] audacious 3.2
http://people.atrpms.net/~pcavalcanti/srpms/audacious-3.2-1.fc14.src.rpm http://people.atrpms.net/~pcavalcanti/srpms/audacious-plugins-3.2-1.fc14.src.rpm -- Paulo Roma Cavalcanti LCG - UFRJ ___ atrpms-devel mailing list atrpms-devel@atrpms.net http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-devel
[ATrpms-devel] ampache for F15 and F16
http://people.atrpms.net/~pcavalcanti/srpms/ampache-3.5.4-12.fc14.src.rpm The only problem was that Requires(hint) is no longer supported ... -- Paulo Roma Cavalcanti LCG - UFRJ ___ atrpms-devel mailing list atrpms-devel@atrpms.net http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-devel
Re: [ATrpms-devel] audacious 3.1.1
On Wed, Jan 4, 2012 at 5:00 PM, Paulo Cavalcanti pro...@gmail.com wrote: http://people.atrpms.net/~pcavalcanti/srpms/audacious-3.1.1-1.fc14.src.rpm http://people.atrpms.net/~pcavalcanti/srpms/audacious-plugins-3.1.1-1.fc14.src.rpm 3.1.2 was out today: http://people.atrpms.net/~pcavalcanti/srpms/audacious-3.1.2-1.fc14.src.rpm http://people.atrpms.net/~pcavalcanti/srpms/audacious-plugins-3.1.2-1.fc14.src.rpm -- Paulo Roma Cavalcanti LCG - UFRJ ___ atrpms-devel mailing list atrpms-devel@atrpms.net http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-devel
Re: [ATrpms-devel] New mp3splt suite
On Fri, Jan 6, 2012 at 11:12 AM, Paulo Cavalcanti pro...@gmail.com wrote: http://people.atrpms.net/~pcavalcanti/srpms/libmp3splt-0.7.1-9.fc14.src.rpm http://people.atrpms.net/~pcavalcanti/srpms/mp3splt-2.4.1-9.fc14.src.rpm http://people.atrpms.net/~pcavalcanti/srpms/mp3splt-gtk-0.7.1-9.fc14.src.rpm If you build mp3splt-gtk for F14 (gtk3 is broken on F14), you should use: --without gtk3 Unfortunately, it does not build for rhel6 any more (needs gtk2 = 2.20). A last remark. For being able to communicate with audacious, it is necessary to compile mp3splt-gtk using gtk3 and audacious 3 or gtk2 and audacious 2. Since the soname of audacious libs 2.5 and 3 are the same, according to my tests, it does not matter which version one uses at runtime. Therefore, you can choose building for F15 and F16 using gtk3 or gtk2 (and the appropriate audacious version should be picked up during the compilation). Thanks. I patched the configure.ac file and mp3splt-gtk also builds for rhel6 now. Just use --without gtk3 Same .src.rpm -- Paulo Roma Cavalcanti LCG - UFRJ ___ atrpms-devel mailing list atrpms-devel@atrpms.net http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-devel
[ATrpms-devel] vlc 1.1.13
http://people.atrpms.net/~pcavalcanti/srpms/vlc-1.1.13-74.fc14.src.rpm -- Paulo Roma Cavalcanti LCG - UFRJ ___ atrpms-devel mailing list atrpms-devel@atrpms.net http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-devel
[ATrpms-devel] audacious 3.1.1
http://people.atrpms.net/~pcavalcanti/srpms/audacious-3.1.1-1.fc14.src.rpm http://people.atrpms.net/~pcavalcanti/srpms/audacious-plugins-3.1.1-1.fc14.src.rpm -- Paulo Roma Cavalcanti LCG - UFRJ ___ atrpms-devel mailing list atrpms-devel@atrpms.net http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-devel
[ATrpms-devel] New mpd, kradio4 and alsa-driver
http://people.atrpms.net/~pcavalcanti/srpms/mpd-0.16.6-21.el6.src.rpm http://people.atrpms.net/~pcavalcanti/srpms/kradio4-4.0.2.1-2.fc14.src.rpm http://people.atrpms.net/~pcavalcanti/srpms/alsa-driver-1.0.24-92.fc14.src.rpm Hi, Axel this new alsa-driver should compile on Fedora and the last two rhel5 kernels (only), either i686 or x86_64. kradio4 has just a small fix for the internet radio. Thanks. -- Paulo Roma Cavalcanti LCG - UFRJ ___ atrpms-devel mailing list atrpms-devel@atrpms.net http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-devel
Re: [ATrpms-devel] New libdvbpsi
On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 2:34 AM, Paulo Cavalcanti pro...@gmail.com wrote: http://people.atrpms.net/~pcavalcanti/srpms/libdvbpsi-0.2.2-1.fc14.x86_64.rpm The previous version was presenting some problems ... Axel, the previous version was really broken. Some dvb-t channels did no even tune in ... -- Paulo Roma Cavalcanti LCG - UFRJ ___ atrpms-devel mailing list atrpms-devel@atrpms.net http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-devel
Re: [ATrpms-devel] New libdvbpsi
On Sun, Nov 27, 2011 at 3:31 PM, Axel Thimm axel.th...@atrpms.net wrote: Hi, On Sun, Nov 27, 2011 at 02:48:59PM -0200, Paulo Cavalcanti wrote: On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 2:34 AM, Paulo Cavalcanti pro...@gmail.com wrote: http://people.atrpms.net/~pcavalcanti/srpms/libdvbpsi-0.2.2-1.fc14.x86_64.rpm Axel, the previous version was really broken. Some dvb-t channels did no even tune in ... Could you also send the src.rpm? :) -- This is the one that works (the broken is 0.2.1): http://people.atrpms.net/~pcavalcanti/srpms/libdvbpsi-0.2.2-1.fc14.x86_64.rpm There is also: http://people.atrpms.net/~pcavalcanti/srpms/CGAL-3.9-1.fc12.src.rpm http://people.atrpms.net/~pcavalcanti/srpms/kradio4-4.0.2.1-1.fc14.src.rpm Thanks. -- Paulo Roma Cavalcanti LCG - UFRJ ___ atrpms-devel mailing list atrpms-devel@atrpms.net http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-devel
Re: [ATrpms-devel] New libdvbpsi
On Sun, Nov 27, 2011 at 8:57 PM, Axel Thimm axel.th...@atrpms.net wrote: On Sun, Nov 27, 2011 at 06:09:29PM -0200, Paulo Cavalcanti wrote: On Sun, Nov 27, 2011 at 3:31 PM, Axel Thimm axel.th...@atrpms.net wrote: Hi, On Sun, Nov 27, 2011 at 02:48:59PM -0200, Paulo Cavalcanti wrote: On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 2:34 AM, Paulo Cavalcanti pro...@gmail.com wrote: http://people.atrpms.net/~pcavalcanti/srpms/libdvbpsi-0.2.2-1.fc14.x86_64.rpm Axel, the previous version was really broken. Some dvb-t channels did no even tune in ... Could you also send the src.rpm? :) -- This is the one that works (the broken is 0.2.1): http://people.atrpms.net/~pcavalcanti/srpms/libdvbpsi-0.2.2-1.fc14.x86_64.rpm It is still not a src.rpm. :) Now it is: http://people.atrpms.net/~pcavalcanti/srpms/libdvbpsi-0.2.2-1.fc14.src.rpm Sorry ... -- Paulo Roma Cavalcanti LCG - UFRJ ___ atrpms-devel mailing list atrpms-devel@atrpms.net http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-devel
[ATrpms-devel] New libdvbpsi
http://people.atrpms.net/~pcavalcanti/srpms/libdvbpsi-0.2.2-1.fc14.x86_64.rpm The previous version was presenting some problems ... -- Paulo Roma Cavalcanti LCG - UFRJ ___ atrpms-devel mailing list atrpms-devel@atrpms.net http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-devel
Re: [ATrpms-devel] New vlc and libdvbpsi
On Mon, Oct 31, 2011 at 7:17 AM, Paulo Cavalcanti pro...@gmail.com wrote: There are new versions on vlc site If this helps: http://people.atrpms.net/~pcavalcanti/srpms/vlc-1.1.12-72.fc14.src.rpm http://people.atrpms.net/~pcavalcanti/srpms/libdvbpsi-0.2.1-1.fc14.src.rpm -- Paulo Roma Cavalcanti LCG - UFRJ ___ atrpms-devel mailing list atrpms-devel@atrpms.net http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-devel
[ATrpms-devel] kradio4 fix for ffmpeg 0.8.4
Hi, Axel kradio4 internet radio was crashing with ffmpeg 0.8.4 (in fact, it did not even compile any more). This is a fix, while version 4.0.3 is not officially released: http://people.atrpms.net/~pcavalcanti/srpms/kradio4-4.0.2.1-1.fc14.src.rpm This is, in fact, the current git version. Thanks. -- Paulo Roma Cavalcanti LCG - UFRJ ___ atrpms-devel mailing list atrpms-devel@atrpms.net http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-devel
[ATrpms-devel] New mpg123 available
http://people.atrpms.net/~pcavalcanti/srpms/mpg123-1.13.4-16.fc14.src.rpm Thanks. -- Paulo Roma Cavalcanti LCG - UFRJ ___ atrpms-devel mailing list atrpms-devel@atrpms.net http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-devel
