Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Intona USB thing
Well some Audio Note DAC's may not actually be transparent some of thier design desicions are "unortodox". So it migth always stand out . But it's cool that anyone owning AN products trying . Main hifi: Touch + CIA PS +MeridianG68J MeridianHD621 MeridianG98DH 2 x MeridianDSP5200 MeridianDSP5200HC 2 xMeridianDSP3100 +Rel Stadium 3 sub. Bedroom/Office: Boom Kitchen: Touch + powered Fostex PM0.4 Misc use: Radio (with battery) iPad1 with iPengHD & SqueezePad (spares Touch, SB3, reciever ,controller ) server HP proliant micro server N36L with ClearOS Linux http://people.xiph.org/~xiphmont/demo/neil-young.html Mnyb's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=4143 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=106914 ___ audiophiles mailing list audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles
Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Intona USB thing
foxesden wrote: > I have a Pi-Pico player hooked into and April Music DAC and a Squeezebox > Touch running via an Audio GD Digital interface into and old (i.e. not > NOS) Audio Note Dac 3 Signature. > > I was originally going to sell the Audio Note Dac but just can't do it. > > > Anyway I sometimes do A/B comparisons either through my main amp or a > headphone amp by syncing the 2. If I need to do a DBT I level match and > then get my son to switch sources. I can tell the difference between the > Touch Analogue (noisy) vs a cheap NOS dac (less noisy) but not really > between the other 2. > > Having this setup I have been able to check whether different cables etc > make a difference - I can only spot the really bad ones. > > So context set. I was reading about USB re-clockers etc and the > consensus on the web seems to be that the Intona makes a difference. > This product is not marketed as an Audio device but for medical / > industrial purposes. The fact that the company recommends using the > cheaper one for audio made me think it was worth a try. > > So I got the device today. And tried it in the April Music chain. A/B > check (I know not perfect) it may have widened the sound-stage, but I > doubt if I could reliably tell a difference. > > Switched it around and put in the chain SB Touch -> Intona -> Audio-GD > -> Audio Note and BAM. The volume has gone up massively. > > Any ideas why this might be? I had level matched before putting the > thing in the chain and it must be 10 db louder - I mean it hurt. You seem badly confused about level matching. You do it AFTER you put the components under test into the test system. The fact that one component is louder than another is simply the nature of things, and it is why we do level matching. You also seem confused about proper testing. It appears that what you are doing is a Single Blind test, and those have been known to be hihgly prone to being rediculously invalid since the early 1800s, and the fact that they proved the existence of horses that could decode complex spken commands and do aritmetic in their heads. Search on "Clever Hans" arnyk's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=64365 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=106914 ___ audiophiles mailing list audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles
[SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Intona USB thing
I have a Pi-Pico player hooked into and April Music DAC and a Squeezebox Touch running via an Audio GD Digital interface into and old (i.e. not NOS) Audio Note Dac 3 Signature. I was originally going to sell the Audio Note Dac but just can't do it. Anyway I sometimes do A/B comparisons either through my main amp or a headphone amp by syncing the 2. If I need to do a DBT I level match and then get my son to switch sources. I can tell the difference between the Touch Analogue (noisy) vs a cheap NOS dac (less noisy) but not really between the other 2. Having this setup I have been able to check whether different cables etc make a difference - I can only spot the really bad ones. So context set. I was reading about USB re-clockers etc and the consensus on the web seems to be that the Intona makes a difference. This product is not marketed as an Audio device but for medical / industrial purposes. The fact that the company recommends using the cheaper one for audio made me think it was worth a try. So I got the device today. And tried it in the April Music chain. A/B check (I know not perfect) it may have widened the sound-stage, but I doubt if I could reliably tell a difference. Switched it around and put in the chain SB Touch -> Intona -> Audio-GD -> Audio Note and BAM. The volume has gone up massively. Any ideas why this might be? I had level matched before putting the thing in the chain and it must be 10 db louder - I mean it hurt. foxesden's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=56286 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=106914 ___ audiophiles mailing list audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles
Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Transporter SE does not play from digital inputs
jazzman53 wrote: > > Bear in mind if responding that I'm a senior and not at all computer > savvy. > Hah! LMS on a dedicated server (FitPC3) Transporter (Ethernet) - main listening, Onkyo receiver, Paradigm speakers Touch (WiFi) - home theater 5.1, Sony receiver, Energy speakers Boom 1 (WiFi) - work-space Boom 2 (WiFi) - various (deck, garage, etc.) Radio (WiFi) - home office Control - Squeeze Control (Android mobile), 2 Controllers (seldom used), Squeeze Remote (on Surface Pro 4) Touch x 1 - spare UE Radio x 1 - spare Boom x 1 - spare Controller x 1 - Spare Duet Receiver (backup) RonM's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=17029 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=106893 ___ audiophiles mailing list audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles
