[SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Re: Transporter as external DAC - which cable?

2006-10-17 Thread SoftwireEngineer

IF the Transporter and the CD player digital connectors are true 75Ohm
(possibly with  a pulse-transformer termination), then a 75ohm cable
with 75ohm BNC connection would be the best sounding. I dont think
other RCA digital cables (so called 'audiophile' brands) will improve
the sound (it might sound different though).


-- 
SoftwireEngineer

SoftwireEngineer's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=7000
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=28701

___
audiophiles mailing list
audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles


[SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Re: Transporter as external DAC - which cable?

2006-10-17 Thread tomsi42

max.spicer;146874 Wrote: 
> That's odd.  The article that Triode linked to specifically stated that
> you wouldn't damage connectors by connecting 50ohm to 75ohm and vice
> versa.
> 
> Max

That you damage the connectors is probably a misunderstanding. The
article states that the center pins are of different diameters at the
soldering end. And that is of course irrelevant in use.


-- 
tomsi42

SB3, Rotel RC-1070/RB-1070, dynaBel Exact, Kimber Kable 4TC and Timbre.

tomsi42's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=2477
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=28701

___
audiophiles mailing list
audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles


[SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Re: Transporter as external DAC - which cable?

2006-10-17 Thread max . spicer

DasGutHerrDoktor;146793 Wrote: 
> Be very careful with 50 vs 75 ohm BNC connectors. As pointed out one has
> fatter pin than the other (cant remember which is which). If you connect
> 'fat pin' plug to 'thin pin' socket you will physically damage the
> socket - not good
That's odd.  The article that Triode linked to specifically stated that
you wouldn't damage connectors by connecting 50ohm to 75ohm and vice
versa.

Max


-- 
max.spicer

What do we want?  Smoother Analog VU with FLAC!
When do we want it?  At the soonest possible convenience to the
hard-working yet undervalued Slim Developers.  ;-)

max.spicer's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=23
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=28701

___
audiophiles mailing list
audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles


[SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Re: Transporter as external DAC - which cable?

2006-10-16 Thread holmsn

Yes, quite correct, it is the 50 ohm type which has the fatter pin.I
well remember being told off by more experienced colleagues years ago
for putting 50 ohm leads on to oscilloscope inputs ( always 75 ohm )
compared with RF signal generators etc which were generally 50 ohm.


-- 
holmsn

holmsn's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=3809
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=28701

___
audiophiles mailing list
audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles


[SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Re: Transporter as external DAC - which cable?

2006-10-16 Thread DasGutHerrDoktor

Be very careful with 50 vs 75 ohm BNC connectors. As pointed out one has
fatter pin than the other (cant remember which is which). If you connect
'fat pin' plug to 'thin pin' socket you will physically damage the
socket - not good


-- 
DasGutHerrDoktor

DasGutHerrDoktor's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=5214
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=28701

___
audiophiles mailing list
audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles


[SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Re: Transporter as external DAC - which cable?

2006-10-16 Thread max . spicer

Thanks for that - I'm pretty certain it's 50ohm cable going by those
diagrams and descriptions.

I asked an electronics mate of mine and he said he didn't think it
would make much difference.  He reckoned the most likely effect was
that it would lose signal strength (my words, not his) on account of
the reflections at the 75-50ohm and 50-75ohm transitions (again, my
words!).  Given that it works as it is, and sounds a lot better than
the cd player, I think I'll stick!  It's always fun to hear about the
theory though, even if I do only understand 50% of it.  ;-)

Max

Triode;146788 Wrote: 
> Depends what you mean by "network cable".  Old ethernet cable and much
> lab stuff is 50 ohm characteristic impedance.  Patch cables used for
> telco transmission links [1.5M, 2M, 34M, 45M etc] is 75 ohm.
> 
> The bnc connectors should match the cable impedance - normally the 75
> ohm ones don't have insulation around the earth connection - see here
> (thanks to google!):
> http://sosnick.uchicago.edu/BNC_50_75.html


-- 
max.spicer

What do we want?  Smoother Analog VU with FLAC!
When do we want it?  At the soonest possible convenience to the
hard-working yet undervalued Slim Developers.  ;-)

max.spicer's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=23
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=28701

___
audiophiles mailing list
audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles


[SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Re: Transporter as external DAC - which cable?

2006-10-16 Thread Triode

Depends what you mean by "network cable".  Old ethernet cable and much
lab stuff is 50 ohm characteristic impedance.  Patch cables used for
telco transmission links [1.5M, 2M, 34M, 45M etc] is 75 ohm.

The bnc connectors should match the cable impedance - normally the 75
ohm ones don't have insulation around the earth connection - see here
(thanks to google!):
http://sosnick.uchicago.edu/BNC_50_75.html


-- 
Triode

Triode's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=17
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=28701

___
audiophiles mailing list
audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles


[SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Re: Transporter as external DAC - which cable?

2006-10-16 Thread Craig

Max,

Over a meter or so, the cable is neither 50 or 75 ohms. It needs to be
much longer to develop it's characteristic impedence but 50 and 75 ohm
BNC's are physically different, IIRC it's the diameter of the pin
that's different

Craig


-- 
Craig

Craig's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=96
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=28701

___
audiophiles mailing list
audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles


[SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Re: Transporter as external DAC - which cable?

2006-10-16 Thread tomsi42

If I remember correctly, the BNC networks cables are 50ohms, not 75ohms.
And the transporter wants 75ohms, I saw in one of the other threads.
This difference is enough to degrade signal quality, so a proper 75ohms
should be better.


-- 
tomsi42

SB3, Rotel RC-1070/RB-1070, dynaBel Exact, Kimber Kable 4TC and Timbre.

tomsi42's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=2477
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=28701

___
audiophiles mailing list
audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles


[SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Re: Transporter as external DAC - which cable?

2006-10-16 Thread Rangdo

richidoo;146555 Wrote: 
> There is ample evidence that digital cables do have an impact on sound
> quality. I have read several articles about it that you can easily
> find. Sorry I did not save the links. Cheap plastic RCA audio cables do
> not sound as good as a well shielded cable.

I can back this up.  I'm pretty much a cable agnostic (especially after
recent comparisons with my mates), but now I'm just an analogie
agnostic.

When I got my Benchmark I started out with a Belden cable which sounded
pretty good.  Then I got a Black Rhodium Scherzo off fleabay as an
experiment - marked improvement in all areas but especially bass (a lot
more of it).  

So after seeing rave reports on the Stereovox XV2 I thought I'd give
that a try - much tighter bass and the soundstage was suddenly much
wider and more 3D.  The XV2 is definitely staying, I'm puzzled that
I've heard little to no difference in various analogues yet such marked
difference in digitals but hey ho, it's all sounding good :)


-- 
Rangdo

Rangdo's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=5238
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=28701

___
audiophiles mailing list
audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles


[SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Re: Transporter as external DAC - which cable?

2006-10-16 Thread richidoo

There is ample evidence that digital cables do have an impact on sound
quality. I have read several articles about it that you can easily
find. Sorry I did not save the links. Cheap plastic RCA audio cables do
not sound as good as a well shielded cable. 

Whatever cable best preserves a 75 ohm composite video signal will work
best for digital audio. Usually this means more shielding and good
metallurgy. BNC is a professional well-shielded connection, so it's not
surprising to me that it sounds better!

As for the CD player, it is very handy to have when you want to play a
new CD or a friend's CD without ripping to computer first.

Any cheap CD player's digital output is likely more than adequate
source for transporter as DAC.

http://www.audioholics.com/techtips/buyingguides/cablebudgetguidelines.php


-- 
richidoo

richidoo's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=3097
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=28701

___
audiophiles mailing list
audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles