Re: [aur-general] Update request for supertuxkart
2011/11/19 Heiko Baums : > But it could have been that you have forgotten it in the meantime. ;-) An unnecessary joke, when this was obviously not the case here. - Alexander
Re: [aur-general] Resigning as a TU
2011/11/21 Sven-Hendrik Haase > On 11/21/2011 06:43 AM, Jan Steffens wrote: > > On Sun, Nov 20, 2011 at 4:02 PM, Stefan Husmann > > wrote: > >> Hello, > >> > >> I want to resign as a TU. I do not have the time anymore to fulfill > >> my TU duties and to handle the new package signing stuff. > >> > >> By the way I suggest to remove the package scilab and maybe also the > >> dependencies from the repos. There are long open bug reports, and they > >> are unsolvable. > >> > >> Regards Stefan > >> > > Another resignation :-( > > > > Good luck in your future endeavours. Thanks for your help. > > Aw, see you around Stefan. :( > > Pity too, I'm all out of ponies currently. > > Really sad
Re: [aur-general] Orphaning a 1000 packages
On Fri, Nov 11, 2011 at 21:57, Justin Davis wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 4:22 PM, Magnus Therning wrote:
>> I'm the current maintainer of ArchHaskell and within the small team
>> we've reached the decision to drop support for the huge set of package
>> owned by the user arch-haskell on AUR.
>>
>> Currently we maintain 300+ binary packages, and we'd like to keep them
>> on AUR. All others should be orphaned (or removed). Doing that
>> manually would be painful to say the least, are there any tools that
>> assist with mass-orphaning?
>>
>> /M
>>
>> --
>> Magnus Therning OpenPGP: 0xAB4DFBA4
>> email: mag...@therning.org jabber: mag...@therning.org
>> twitter: magthe http://therning.org/magnus
>>
>> Most software today is very much like an Egyptian pyramid with
>> millions of bricks piled on top of each other, with no structural
>> integrity, but just done by brute force and thousands of slaves.
>> -- Alan Kay
>>
>
> It might churn your stomach ;-) but you could use my WWW::AUR perl
> module set ...
>
> use WWW::AUR::Login;
> my $u = WWW::AUR::Login->new('arch-haskell', 'password');
> for my $p ($u->packages) {
> $u->disown($p);
> }
>
> You'd need the perl-www-aur package installed:
> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=44180
Well, I got tired of waiting for others to do my bidding, so I decided
to try to get it done myself instead... and perl doesn't churn my
stomach, even though I do my best to avoid it for aesthetic reasons ;)
I installled that package of yours, and found that I need
perl-lwp-protocol-https (available in [extra]) in order to log in.
It's a bit slow, but it seems to work nicely. Thanks for the tip!
/M
--
Magnus Therning OpenPGP: 0xAB4DFBA4
email: mag...@therning.org jabber: mag...@therning.org
twitter: magthe http://therning.org/magnus
[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 0 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 1 fully signed off package * 11 packages missing signoffs * 8 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (9 total) == * fail2ban-0.8.4-3 (any) 1/2 signoffs * pacman-contrib-4.0.0-2 (any) 1/1000 signoffs * expac-0.07-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * ogre-1.8.0RC1-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * packagekit-0.6.19-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * qtcreator-2.4.0rc-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * ogre-1.8.0RC1-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * packagekit-0.6.19-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * qtcreator-2.4.0rc-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Incomplete signoffs for [unknown] (2 total) == * percona-server-5.5.16_rel22.0-1 (i686) 1/2 signoffs * percona-server-5.5.16_rel22.0-1 (x86_64) 1/2 signoffs == Completed signoffs (1 total) == * expac-0.07-1 (x86_64) == All packages in [community-testing] for more than 14 days (8 total) == * fail2ban-0.8.4-3 (any), since 2011-04-10 * expac-0.07-1 (i686), since 2011-10-13 * expac-0.07-1 (x86_64), since 2011-10-13 * pacman-contrib-4.0.0-2 (any), since 2011-10-15 * percona-server-5.5.16_rel22.0-1 (i686), since 2011-10-26 * percona-server-5.5.16_rel22.0-1 (x86_64), since 2011-10-26 * packagekit-0.6.19-2 (i686), since 2011-10-31 * packagekit-0.6.19-2 (x86_64), since 2011-10-31 == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. dan - 2 signoffs 2. tomegun - 2 signoffs 3. dreisner - 2 signoffs
Re: [aur-general] Update request for supertuxkart
Am Mon, 21 Nov 2011 09:01:29 +0100 schrieb Alexander Rødseth : > 2011/11/19 Heiko Baums : > > But it could have been that you have forgotten it in the > > meantime. ;-) > > An unnecessary joke, when this was obviously not the case here. It was neither a joke, nor unnecessary, nor obvious. I already said that I didn't know about the dependency issues when I wrote the request. The last time the package was updated was one year ago and it was six months ago that the package was flagged out-of-date and in the meanwhile upstream has released three updates. So it is thoroughly possible that it could have been forgotten in the meantime. But I already explained that, too. Sometimes one should read the whole e-mails and/or thread before posting such unnecessary comments. Heiko
Re: [aur-general] OCaml clean-up!
Done, thank you. Bartłomiej Piotrowski signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
[aur-general] Removal requst: rxvt-unicode-256color-layoutgaps
rxvt-unicode-256color-layoutgaps http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=34455 Duplicate of: rxvt-unicode-patched http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=44649 (compiled with 256 colour and includes layoutgaps patch)
Re: [aur-general] TU Application - Sébastien Luttringer
On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 11:38:13AM -0500, Dave Reisner wrote: > Yes, I'm top posting. > > It's been 7 days. I'll raise a poll on the AUR for Seb's application. > > Please vote! > > Thanks, > dave > With 12 votes for Yes, 2 votes for No, and 7 abstaining, we have reached a quorom and the proposal passes! Everyone please welcome our newest TU, Sébastien Luttringer. Seb: You may find us lurking on IRC where we will teach you the secret handshake and award you with the ceremonial robe and baseball bat... dave pgpVa0ssV7KOS.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: [aur-general] TU Application - Sébastien Luttringer
On 21.11.2011 23:32, Dave Reisner wrote: > On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 11:38:13AM -0500, Dave Reisner wrote: >> Yes, I'm top posting. >> >> It's been 7 days. I'll raise a poll on the AUR for Seb's application. >> >> Please vote! >> >> Thanks, >> dave >> > > With 12 votes for Yes, 2 votes for No, and 7 abstaining, we have reached > a quorom and the proposal passes! Everyone please welcome our newest TU, > Sébastien Luttringer. > > Seb: You may find us lurking on IRC where we will teach you the secret > handshake and award you with the ceremonial robe and baseball bat... > > dave Welcome to the team. -- Florian Pritz signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
[aur-general] Deletion Request
portaudio-pulse [1] is a redundancy of portaudio, as stated by the previous maintainer. Please delete. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=51583 Thanks in advance
Re: [aur-general] TU Application - Sébastien Luttringer
Le lundi 21 novembre 2011 23:38:51, Florian Pritz a écrit : > On 21.11.2011 23:32, Dave Reisner wrote: > > On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 11:38:13AM -0500, Dave Reisner wrote: > >> Yes, I'm top posting. > >> > >> It's been 7 days. I'll raise a poll on the AUR for Seb's application. > >> > >> Please vote! > >> > >> Thanks, > >> dave > > > > With 12 votes for Yes, 2 votes for No, and 7 abstaining, we have reached > > a quorom and the proposal passes! Everyone please welcome our newest TU, > > Sébastien Luttringer. > > > > Seb: You may find us lurking on IRC where we will teach you the secret > > handshake and award you with the ceremonial robe and baseball bat... > > > > dave > > Welcome to the team. yes, welcome !
Re: [aur-general] Deletion Request
Le lundi 21 novembre 2011 20:41:40, rafael ff1 a écrit : > portaudio-pulse [1] is a redundancy of portaudio, as > stated by the previous maintainer. Please delete. > > [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=51583 > > Thanks in advance Done, thanks ++
Re: [aur-general] TU Application - Sébastien Luttringer
Congrats and welcome! - Alexander
Re: [aur-general] TU Resignation
On Sun, Nov 20, 2011 at 9:32 PM, Thomas S Hatch wrote: > On Sun, Nov 20, 2011 at 12:05 PM, Ray Rashif wrote: > >> On 21 November 2011 00:10, Jelle van der Waa wrote: >> > On 19/11/11 19:44, Thomas S Hatch wrote: >> >> >> >> I have a lot of regret doing this, and I have been working hard to find >> >> the >> >> time to keep up with my TU duties, but every day I have less and less >> time >> >> because work is continually ramping up, and what free time I have left >> >> ends >> >> up going to Salt (http://saltstack.org). >> >> >> >> So, very sadly, I need to resign from my position as an Arch Linux TU. I >> >> hope I can be of assistance to Arch in the future and I am still >> planning >> >> on maintaining the Varch project: https://github.com/thatch45/varch >> >> >> >> So with deep regret, I must resign my brief stint as a TU, it was fun, >> and >> >> I greatly appreciate the opportunity, but it is very unfair of me to not >> >> be >> >> maintaining my packages. >> >> >> >> >> >> Thanks >> >> >> >> -Thomas S Hatch >> > >> > Sad to see you leave, good luck with Salt! >> > >> > -- >> > Jelle van der Waa >> > >> >> One awesome person less :( >> >> Good luck with everything else! >> >> -- >> GPG/PGP ID: C0711BF1 >> > > Thanks everyone, maybe sometime in the future things will clear up enough > for me to come back, but not at the rate things are going now. Life has > changed so much since I joined Arch! > > Keep making the worlds best Linux Distro better! > > -Thomas S Hatch > Can somebody enlighten me what happened with this ML discussion? http://mailman.archlinux.org/pipermail/aur-general/2011-November/thread.html shows a bit of a mess but it doesn't explain why [aur-general] TU Resignation Thomas S Hatch http://mailman.archlinux.org/pipermail/aur-general/2011-November/016543.html looks identical to the previous message: [aur-general] Developer / TU key signing, first master key available Thomas Bächler http://mailman.archlinux.org/pipermail/aur-general/2011-November/016540.html What's even more baffling is that the next 2 messages: http://mailman.archlinux.org/pipermail/aur-general/2011-November/016544.html http://mailman.archlinux.org/pipermail/aur-general/2011-November/016546.html look identical too (the sender and date looks OK). I'm not well-versed in the ML-foo so please rename this thread / start a new one if you think it's more appropriate.
[aur-general] ML etiquette and bounces (was: TU Resignation)
[2011-11-22 00:24:53 +0100] Karol Blazewicz: > Can somebody enlighten me what happened with this ML discussion? A quick look at the headers suggests that somebody messed up their mail server and started bouncing messages back to the list. They have now been blacklisted. > I'm not well-versed in the ML-foo That is easily fixed: http://catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html#uselists http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en/articles/mailing-list-faq/etiquette.html etc. -- Gaetan
Re: [aur-general] Removal requst: rxvt-unicode-256color-layoutgaps
On 21.11.2011 23:23, Jonathan Steel wrote: > rxvt-unicode-256color-layoutgaps > http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=34455 > > Duplicate of: > > rxvt-unicode-patched > http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=44649 > (compiled with 256 colour and includes layoutgaps patch) Votes merged to rxvt-unicode-patched. Bartłomiej Piotrowski signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
[aur-general] Please remove emesene2
Hi, emesene2[1] is in [community] and should be deleted. 1 - https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=48535
Re: [aur-general] Please remove emesene2
Hi, 2011/11/22 Oon-Ee Ng : > Hi, emesene2[1] is in [community] and should be deleted. Thanks. Removed. -- Cordially, Alexander Rødseth Arch Linux Trusted User (xyproto on IRC, trontonic on AUR)
