On Sun, Nov 20, 2011 at 9:32 PM, Thomas S Hatch <thatc...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Sun, Nov 20, 2011 at 12:05 PM, Ray Rashif <sc...@archlinux.org> wrote: > >> On 21 November 2011 00:10, Jelle van der Waa <je...@vdwaa.nl> wrote: >> > On 19/11/11 19:44, Thomas S Hatch wrote: >> >> >> >> I have a lot of regret doing this, and I have been working hard to find >> >> the >> >> time to keep up with my TU duties, but every day I have less and less >> time >> >> because work is continually ramping up, and what free time I have left >> >> ends >> >> up going to Salt (http://saltstack.org). >> >> >> >> So, very sadly, I need to resign from my position as an Arch Linux TU. I >> >> hope I can be of assistance to Arch in the future and I am still >> planning >> >> on maintaining the Varch project: https://github.com/thatch45/varch >> >> >> >> So with deep regret, I must resign my brief stint as a TU, it was fun, >> and >> >> I greatly appreciate the opportunity, but it is very unfair of me to not >> >> be >> >> maintaining my packages. >> >> >> >> >> >> Thanks >> >> >> >> -Thomas S Hatch >> > >> > Sad to see you leave, good luck with Salt! >> > >> > -- >> > Jelle van der Waa >> > >> >> One awesome person less :( >> >> Good luck with everything else! >> >> -- >> GPG/PGP ID: C0711BF1 >> > > Thanks everyone, maybe sometime in the future things will clear up enough > for me to come back, but not at the rate things are going now. Life has > changed so much since I joined Arch! > > Keep making the worlds best Linux Distro better! > > -Thomas S Hatch >
Can somebody enlighten me what happened with this ML discussion? http://mailman.archlinux.org/pipermail/aur-general/2011-November/thread.html shows a bit of a mess but it doesn't explain why [aur-general] TU Resignation Thomas S Hatch http://mailman.archlinux.org/pipermail/aur-general/2011-November/016543.html looks identical to the previous message: [aur-general] Developer / TU key signing, first master key available Thomas Bächler http://mailman.archlinux.org/pipermail/aur-general/2011-November/016540.html What's even more baffling is that the next 2 messages: http://mailman.archlinux.org/pipermail/aur-general/2011-November/016544.html http://mailman.archlinux.org/pipermail/aur-general/2011-November/016546.html look identical too (the sender and date looks OK). I'm not well-versed in the ML-foo so please rename this thread / start a new one if you think it's more appropriate.