[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 14 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 38 packages missing signoffs * 0 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == New packages in [community-testing] in last 24 hours (14 total) == * dgen-sdl-1.32-2 (i686) * libextractor-1.0.1-4 (i686) * opencc-0.4.0-1 (i686) * packagekit-0.7.6-5 (i686) * vdrift-2012.07.22-4 (i686) * virtualbox-modules-4.2.8-2 (i686) * virtualbox-modules-lts-4.2.8-2 (i686) * dgen-sdl-1.32-2 (x86_64) * libextractor-1.0.1-4 (x86_64) * opencc-0.4.0-1 (x86_64) * packagekit-0.7.6-5 (x86_64) * vdrift-2012.07.22-4 (x86_64) * virtualbox-modules-4.2.8-2 (x86_64) * virtualbox-modules-lts-4.2.8-2 (x86_64) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (36 total) == * boinc-7.0.53-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * cdfs-2.6.27-38 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * dgen-sdl-1.32-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * libextractor-1.0.1-4 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * llvm-amdgpu-snapshot-20130219-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * ndiswrapper-1.58-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * open-vm-tools-modules-1:9.2.2-6 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * opencc-0.4.0-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * packagekit-0.7.6-5 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * r8168-8.035.00-5 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * rt3562sta-2.4.1.1-24 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * shapelib-1.3.0-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * tp_smapi-0.41-15 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * vdrift-2012.07.22-4 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * vhba-module-20120422-18 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-4.2.8-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-lts-4.2.8-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * xvba-video-open-0.8.0-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * boinc-7.0.53-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * cdfs-2.6.27-38 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * dgen-sdl-1.32-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * libextractor-1.0.1-4 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * llvm-amdgpu-snapshot-20130219-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * ndiswrapper-1.58-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * open-vm-tools-modules-1:9.2.2-6 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * opencc-0.4.0-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * packagekit-0.7.6-5 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * r8168-8.035.00-5 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * rt3562sta-2.4.1.1-24 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * shapelib-1.3.0-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * tp_smapi-0.41-15 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * vdrift-2012.07.22-4 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * vhba-module-20120422-18 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-4.2.8-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-lts-4.2.8-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * xvba-video-open-0.8.0-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Incomplete signoffs for [unknown] (2 total) == * apitrace-3.0-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * apitrace-3.0-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. eric - 6 signoffs 2. dan - 3 signoffs 3. guillaume - 2 signoffs 4. foutrelis - 1 signoffs
Re: [aur-general] orphan request: mycraft
Den 02-03-2013 05:58, Limao Luo skrev: [...] and included instructions [...] on how to extract the png, I approve of how the PNG-extraction-from-JAR is propagating beyond my mcpatcher PKGBUILD. +1, and good job! :D -- Namasté, Frederik Freso S. Olesen http://freso.dk/
[aur-general] Putting bumblebee and friends into [community]
Hi, I'd like to gather some opinions on this. I was thinking about putting bumblebee, primus and bbswitch into [community] as it doesn't look as though nvidia is going to fix this properly in their driver any time soon. I know about the GPL symbol drama and the supposed fix that is in mainline now but how long until nvidia releases a working driver that makes use of all that? Until then, I think bumblebee is an ok fix. For laptops with optimus, bumblebee is pretty much a necessity if you want any kind of battery life and acceptable sound levels. I have a laptop with optimus and use bumblebee all the time and I think it would make sense to have it in [community]. The sad fact is that bumblebee is currently the only working solution for optimus. Normally I wouldn't ask the mailing list for something mundane as moving packages but as bbswitch is a kernel module and as bumblebee is not very highly regarded as a good solution even by its developers, I thought it'd make sense to ask here first before people got angry. signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: [aur-general] Putting bumblebee and friends into [community]
Hi, I haven't followed the controversy surrounding bumblebee, but if it's a package that's needed to make your system work as it should, I think it weighs towards moving it up from AUR. +1 -- Sincerely, Alexander Rødseth xyproto / TU
[aur-general] Substitute nss_ldap/pam_ldap from [Extra] to nss-pam-ldapd
nss-pam-ldapd is actively maintained while nss_ldap/pam_ldap are not updated in a while. nss-pam-ldapd is more robust too (I had a similar problem like https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/33672 that didn't occur with nss-pam-ldapd; and according to that bug report actually a nss_ldap/pam_ldap setup is simply broken). According to the author ( http://arthurdejong.org/nss-pam-ldapd/) nss-pam-ldapd is faster and more easily to debug (I didn't measured performance, but indeed nss-pam-ldapd is easier to debug, since it's service nslcd have a nice log output). I think Fedora and Mageia uses nss-pam-ldapd for default instead nss_ldap/pam_ldap. Even our Wiki (https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/OpenLDAP_Authentication) is recommending nss-pam-ldapd instead of nss_ldap/pam_ldap (actually, if you follow our Wiki using nss_ldap/pam_ldap you will have a non-working LDAP setup). So I suggest to drop nss_ldap/pam_ldap to AUR and put nss-pam-ldapd on [Extra] repository. -- Thiago Kenji Okada thiago.mas...@gmail.com PGP Key: EEC09705
Re: [aur-general] Putting bumblebee and friends into [community]
Em 02/03/2013 09:53, Sven-Hendrik Haase escreveu: Hi, I'd like to gather some opinions on this. I was thinking about putting bumblebee, primus and bbswitch into [community] as it doesn't look as though nvidia is going to fix this properly in their driver any time soon. I know about the GPL symbol drama and the supposed fix that is in mainline now but how long until nvidia releases a working driver that makes use of all that? Until then, I think bumblebee is an ok fix. For laptops with optimus, bumblebee is pretty much a necessity if you want any kind of battery life and acceptable sound levels. I have a laptop with optimus and use bumblebee all the time and I think it would make sense to have it in [community]. The sad fact is that bumblebee is currently the only working solution for optimus. Normally I wouldn't ask the mailing list for something mundane as moving packages but as bbswitch is a kernel module and as bumblebee is not very highly regarded as a good solution even by its developers, I thought it'd make sense to ask here first before people got angry. I need this package and it gives me headache on every kernel update. I'd be awesome if you move it to [community]. Thanks for the initiative! Rafael Ferreira
Re: [aur-general] [Disownment request] haskell-hashable
On Fri, Mar 01, 2013 at 12:57:31AM +0100, hau...@gmx.com wrote: haskell-hashable [1] hasn't been updated in over a year. I would like to take it over. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=39917 ~ hauzer Since it is flagged out of date for more than 3 months, disowned. Pick up this package anytime you want. -- Ike pgpoH0nTiq2Vn.pgp Description: PGP signature
[aur-general] Merge pyodbc into python2-pyodbc
Hello, the package pyodbc[1] is flagged out of date for over a year, has the wrong name and depends on python, but it's for python2. I've uploaded two new packages, python2-pyodbc[2] for python2 and python-pyodbc[3] for python3. pyodbc[1] should get merged into python2-pyodbc[2]. Thanks in advance, Robert [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/pyodbc/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/python2-pyodbc/ [3] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/python-pyodbc/ PS: Sorry for writing to arch-general, I accidently wrote to the wrong list. -- GnuPG-Key: EDC67BBA Fingerprint: D5F0 BC03 3F6D 521C 6F2D 40C8 DDBA 25D9 EDC6 7BBA signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: [aur-general] Remove request
On Fri, Mar 01, 2013 at 11:07:35AM -0500, Xavier Corredor Llano wrote: Hi remove this packages: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/babiloo/ (development is inactive, the developers recommend use goldendict instead) removed https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/jaziku-dev/ (was renamed to jaziku_dev) Why renamed to jaziku_dev ? If we have -dev, -git, -hg, ... packages we practically dont use underscore in the package name. No action taken yet. thanks -- Xavier Corredor Llano thx -- Ike pgpS_vClKVFkG.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: [aur-general] Merge pyodbc into python2-pyodbc
On Sat, Mar 02, 2013 at 07:05:27PM +0100, Robert Knauer wrote: Hello, the package pyodbc[1] is flagged out of date for over a year, has the wrong name and depends on python, but it's for python2. I've uploaded two new packages, python2-pyodbc[2] for python2 and python-pyodbc[3] for python3. pyodbc[1] should get merged into python2-pyodbc[2]. Thanks in advance, Robert [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/pyodbc/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/python2-pyodbc/ [3] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/python-pyodbc/ PS: Sorry for writing to arch-general, I accidently wrote to the wrong list. -- GnuPG-Key: EDC67BBA Fingerprint: D5F0 BC03 3F6D 521C 6F2D 40C8 DDBA 25D9 EDC6 7BBA merged thx -- Ike pgpln7gH983uo.pgp Description: PGP signature
[aur-general] gnome-cups-manager remove request
Hi, this package [1] it's orphaned and it's an abandoned project, could you remove it? Thanks signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Re: [aur-general] Substitute nss_ldap/pam_ldap from [Extra] to nss-pam-ldapd
I can support this proposal. Ubuntu also uses nss-pam-ldapd for providing account information from ldap. The project is under active development and security fixes are provided very fast by upstream. (see [1]) [1] http://arthurdejong.org/nss-pam-ldapd/CVE-2013-0288 -- Chris
Re: [aur-general] aurtomatic: new python3-aur script
On 03/01/2013 08:20 PM, Xyne wrote: Hi, Some of you may be interested in the new aurtomatic script included in python3-aur [1]. You can use it to do the following from the command line: * comment * vote * unvote * notify * unnotify * flag * unflag The functionality is in the AUR.Aurploader module. There is support there for other interactions if anyone wants to add them before I get around to it. @TUs I expect to eventually get around to adding support for TU actions (internal votes, changing account fields, etc.) It's far down on my todo list but feel free to express interest if you want to bump it up (or submit code). I would probably create a separate front-end for it to avoid user confusion (auTUmatic?). Regards, Xyne [1] http://localhost:8000/projects/python3-aur/ I get: ~ % aurtomatic Traceback (most recent call last): File /usr/bin/aurtomatic, line 94, in module main() File /usr/bin/aurtomatic, line 59, in main actions = list(unique(args.action)) File /usr/bin/aurtomatic, line 41, in unique for foo in whatever: TypeError: 'NoneType' object is not iterable signature.asc Description: PGP signature
[aur-general] gnomad2 deletion request
Hi, gnomad2[1] is orphaned and a death project since 2011, may you delete it from aur? [1]https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/gnomad2/ thanks in advance signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
[aur-general] another deletion request
Hello, sorry by multipost for deletion requests. The package sunbird[1] is discontinued, orphaned and superseded by Thunderbird lightning plugin, so I think we should remove it [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/sunbird/ Thanks again signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Re: [aur-general] Substitute nss_ldap/pam_ldap from [Extra] to nss-pam-ldapd
On Sat, Mar 02, 2013 at 01:32:48PM -0300, Thiago Kenji Okada wrote: nss-pam-ldapd is actively maintained while nss_ldap/pam_ldap are not updated in a while. nss-pam-ldapd is more robust too (I had a similar problem like https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/33672 that didn't occur with nss-pam-ldapd; and according to that bug report actually a nss_ldap/pam_ldap setup is simply broken). According to the author ( http://arthurdejong.org/nss-pam-ldapd/) nss-pam-ldapd is faster and more easily to debug (I didn't measured performance, but indeed nss-pam-ldapd is easier to debug, since it's service nslcd have a nice log output). I think Fedora and Mageia uses nss-pam-ldapd for default instead nss_ldap/pam_ldap. Even our Wiki (https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/OpenLDAP_Authentication) is recommending nss-pam-ldapd instead of nss_ldap/pam_ldap (actually, if you follow our Wiki using nss_ldap/pam_ldap you will have a non-working LDAP setup). So I suggest to drop nss_ldap/pam_ldap to AUR and put nss-pam-ldapd on [Extra] repository. -- Thiago Kenji Okada thiago.mas...@gmail.com PGP Key: EEC09705 Looks like there's already a feature request: https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/32911 @Tom and Allan, you guys maintain the packages that would be replaced here -- either of you have an interest in adopting this? d
Re: [aur-general] Substitute nss_ldap/pam_ldap from [Extra] to nss-pam-ldapd
On Sat, Mar 02, 2013 at 04:13:01PM -0500, Dave Reisner wrote: On Sat, Mar 02, 2013 at 01:32:48PM -0300, Thiago Kenji Okada wrote: nss-pam-ldapd is actively maintained while nss_ldap/pam_ldap are not updated in a while. nss-pam-ldapd is more robust too (I had a similar problem like https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/33672 that didn't occur with nss-pam-ldapd; and according to that bug report actually a nss_ldap/pam_ldap setup is simply broken). According to the author ( http://arthurdejong.org/nss-pam-ldapd/) nss-pam-ldapd is faster and more easily to debug (I didn't measured performance, but indeed nss-pam-ldapd is easier to debug, since it's service nslcd have a nice log output). I think Fedora and Mageia uses nss-pam-ldapd for default instead nss_ldap/pam_ldap. Even our Wiki (https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/OpenLDAP_Authentication) is recommending nss-pam-ldapd instead of nss_ldap/pam_ldap (actually, if you follow our Wiki using nss_ldap/pam_ldap you will have a non-working LDAP setup). So I suggest to drop nss_ldap/pam_ldap to AUR and put nss-pam-ldapd on [Extra] repository. -- Thiago Kenji Okada thiago.mas...@gmail.com PGP Key: EEC09705 Looks like there's already a feature request: https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/32911 @Tom and Allan, you guys maintain the packages that would be replaced here -- either of you have an interest in adopting this? d Argh. Reading the wrong field... Definitely all Jan.
Re: [aur-general] Easy way to find out package dependencies
On Sat, Mar 02, 2013 at 11:35:40PM +0100, oliver wrote:
Hello,
is there an easy way to find out, which package dependencies
a package has?
Say, i want to write the PKGBUILD for a package,
and the compilation on my system (.7configure/cmake and make)
does work without problems.
Then I don't get a message about missing libraries.
So, it's easy to compile the stuff, but needs some
effort to find out the dependencies.
Possibly with ldd the linked stuff can be found out,
but the library names not necessarily are the same as
the names of the package that provide these libraries.
So, it may need some effort to find out the packages.
Is there an easy way to find out the package names?
Maybe someone already has written a script that
reverse-lookups the package names from ldd-output?
Any ideas on that?
Ciao,
Oliver
This is probably what you're looking for:
https://github.com/falconindy/bin-scripts/blob/master/elf2pkgs
You can get a concise list by running this over the pkg/ directory after
building:
find pkg/ -type f -executable -exec elf2pkgs {} + 2/dev/null
d
Re: [aur-general] Easy way to find out package dependencies
On 02/03/2013 23:46, Dave Reisner wrote:
On Sat, Mar 02, 2013 at 11:35:40PM +0100, oliver wrote:
Hello,
is there an easy way to find out, which package dependencies
a package has?
Say, i want to write the PKGBUILD for a package,
and the compilation on my system (.7configure/cmake and make)
does work without problems.
Then I don't get a message about missing libraries.
So, it's easy to compile the stuff, but needs some
effort to find out the dependencies.
Possibly with ldd the linked stuff can be found out,
but the library names not necessarily are the same as
the names of the package that provide these libraries.
So, it may need some effort to find out the packages.
Is there an easy way to find out the package names?
Maybe someone already has written a script that
reverse-lookups the package names from ldd-output?
Any ideas on that?
Ciao,
Oliver
This is probably what you're looking for:
https://github.com/falconindy/bin-scripts/blob/master/elf2pkgs
You can get a concise list by running this over the pkg/ directory
after
building:
find pkg/ -type f -executable -exec elf2pkgs {} + 2/dev/null
d
Wouldn't it be easier to just use namcap, or am I missing something?
Re: [aur-general] Easy way to find out package dependencies
On Sat, Mar 02, 2013 at 11:50:57PM +0100, Johannes Löthberg wrote:
On 02/03/2013 23:46, Dave Reisner wrote:
On Sat, Mar 02, 2013 at 11:35:40PM +0100, oliver wrote:
Hello,
is there an easy way to find out, which package dependencies
a package has?
Say, i want to write the PKGBUILD for a package,
and the compilation on my system (.7configure/cmake and make)
does work without problems.
Then I don't get a message about missing libraries.
So, it's easy to compile the stuff, but needs some
effort to find out the dependencies.
Possibly with ldd the linked stuff can be found out,
but the library names not necessarily are the same as
the names of the package that provide these libraries.
So, it may need some effort to find out the packages.
Is there an easy way to find out the package names?
Maybe someone already has written a script that
reverse-lookups the package names from ldd-output?
Any ideas on that?
Ciao,
Oliver
This is probably what you're looking for:
https://github.com/falconindy/bin-scripts/blob/master/elf2pkgs
You can get a concise list by running this over the pkg/ directory
after
building:
find pkg/ -type f -executable -exec elf2pkgs {} + 2/dev/null
d
Wouldn't it be easier to just use namcap, or am I missing something?
Probably. I run pacman from git, so namcap doesn't work for me.
Re: [aur-general] Easy way to find out package dependencies
Actually, remy just applied a patch to fix pyalpm compilation, and you
can use this PKGBUILD to get it working with pacman-git:
https://github.com/neersighted/PKGBUILDs/blob/master/pyalpm-pacman41-git/PKGBUILD
On Sat, Mar 2, 2013, at 03:01 PM, Dave Reisner wrote:
On Sat, Mar 02, 2013 at 11:50:57PM +0100, Johannes Löthberg wrote:
On 02/03/2013 23:46, Dave Reisner wrote:
On Sat, Mar 02, 2013 at 11:35:40PM +0100, oliver wrote:
Hello,
is there an easy way to find out, which package dependencies
a package has?
Say, i want to write the PKGBUILD for a package,
and the compilation on my system (.7configure/cmake and make)
does work without problems.
Then I don't get a message about missing libraries.
So, it's easy to compile the stuff, but needs some
effort to find out the dependencies.
Possibly with ldd the linked stuff can be found out,
but the library names not necessarily are the same as
the names of the package that provide these libraries.
So, it may need some effort to find out the packages.
Is there an easy way to find out the package names?
Maybe someone already has written a script that
reverse-lookups the package names from ldd-output?
Any ideas on that?
Ciao,
Oliver
This is probably what you're looking for:
https://github.com/falconindy/bin-scripts/blob/master/elf2pkgs
You can get a concise list by running this over the pkg/ directory
after
building:
find pkg/ -type f -executable -exec elf2pkgs {} + 2/dev/null
d
Wouldn't it be easier to just use namcap, or am I missing something?
Probably. I run pacman from git, so namcap doesn't work for me.
--
Neer Sighted, Hacker
http://neersighted.com | neersigh...@myopera.com {01DC2056}
[aur-general] Deletion request: python3-argparse
Misnamed and unnecessary package https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/python3-argparse/
Re: [aur-general] aurtomatic: new python3-aur script
Johannes Löthberg wrote: I get: ~ % aurtomatic Traceback (most recent call last): File /usr/bin/aurtomatic, line 94, in module main() File /usr/bin/aurtomatic, line 59, in main actions = list(unique(args.action)) File /usr/bin/aurtomatic, line 41, in unique for foo in whatever: TypeError: 'NoneType' object is not iterable fixed Despite the name, don't expect it to do much without any arguments... that may be a feature in version 2040 once we get open source drivers for neural interfaces and well-documented Python bindings.
Re: [aur-general] Putting bumblebee and friends into [community]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 02/03/13 09:53, Sven-Hendrik Haase wrote: Hi, I'd like to gather some opinions on this. I was thinking about putting bumblebee, primus and bbswitch into [community] as it doesn't look as though nvidia is going to fix this properly in their driver any time soon. I know about the GPL symbol drama and the supposed fix that is in mainline now but how long until nvidia releases a working driver that makes use of all that? Until then, I think bumblebee is an ok fix. For laptops with optimus, bumblebee is pretty much a necessity if you want any kind of battery life and acceptable sound levels. I have a laptop with optimus and use bumblebee all the time and I think it would make sense to have it in [community]. The sad fact is that bumblebee is currently the only working solution for optimus. I think you should move too many of the dependencies from aur to multilib too.. Normally I wouldn't ask the mailing list for something mundane as moving packages but as bbswitch is a kernel module and as bumblebee is not very highly regarded as a good solution even by its developers, I thought it'd make sense to ask here first before people got angry. +1 I suggested you to move this to community, i've prepared some of the packages that are on aur, i did plans to move this, but then on the way i am not using much bumblebee now .. so count with my support / help co-maintaining this. - -- Be a local everywhere! Angel Velasquez CTO/Co-Founder @ citibuddies Arch Linux Developer @citibuddies @angvp #citibuddies http://www.citibuddies.com http://www.angvp.com.ar -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJRMvyWAAoJEEKh2xXsEzut9okIALAlhm1QhkYKzzsvbSjZejvf wJK50ODj5OgfdVN3xa6D7F8q9yruoZJ53shmohpvvmA0Rx0rlxTdRGyblHRGOHke iX7Fd/v8naeSxaxBzWW4fBQgw2WLAs1gea1xc6XvnITxo7eGYep0ccvIu+TA+fZf yCQ5vVO/6D51DQxhtRLJjLrG8PAslNQ6aEijetsOnnAwe8FtVfpizcV7eExPJ8fh OyAjxfPopzsP/UYu7hwFPQfupUufz74pnBqdwVc1kX4hngWURa7tAe7IDOyYxHI8 ERui2JYhoPN0H03xP81ZI+1VgbCrZAIPF7bm8qNooP4ziO1UCUSPm9GCKPrqmpg= =ZLlo -END PGP SIGNATURE-
[aur-general] Remove request for stepmania-svn
Hello, list! I'm the current maintainer of stepmania-svn ( https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/stepmania-svn/) which builds the SVN version of the old Stepmania 4 branch. Since there already exist packages for the HG version of Stepmania 5 ( https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/sm-ssc-hg) as well as for the last beta version of Stepmania 4 (https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/stepmania-beta), I think, there is no need for stepmania-svn any more. Also, currently the package doesn't build due to a compilation error of an old ffmpeg revision which is so old that I wouldn't really want to investigate the issue. Thanks, Michael
