Re: [aur-general] [Removal Request] nodejs-yapp.js

[Felix Yan]

On Monday, February 24, 2014 11:53:05 Andy Weidenbaum wrote:
> Upstream source is no longer available. Please remove this
> package
> .
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Andy

Removed, thanks.

Regards,
Felix Yan

signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

[aur-general] [Removal Request] nodejs-yapp.js

[Andy Weidenbaum]

Upstream source is no longer available. Please remove this
package
.

Thanks,

Andy

Re: [aur-general] [Removal Request] lightworks

[carstene1ns]

Am 24.02.2014 17:54, schrieb Karol Blazewicz:
> Status?
> There still are two packages:
> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?K=lightworks

lwks by stjhimy:
+ automatic download of source
+ older
+ votes
- name
- maintainers "today" is two weeks so far

lightworks by PyroDevil:
+ name
- needs manual download of source

My suggestion is merging lwks -> lightworks, add 'lwks' to description
(so it can be found by that name) and add DLAGENTS overwrite to new package.

best regards,
carstene1ns



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: [aur-general] Disown Request

[Felix Yan]

On Monday, February 24, 2014 11:30:25 David J. Haines wrote:
> Please disown yeganesh so that I can pick it up. I contacted the
> maintainer via e-mail two weeks ago, to no response.
> 
> Here's the link:
> 
> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/yeganesh/
> 
> Thanks!

Disowned, thanks.

Regards,
Felix Yan

signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Re: [aur-general] Removal request: pcf-tewi

[Felix Yan]

On Monday, February 24, 2014 18:01:53 Lucy hi wrote:
> pcf-tewi: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/pcf-tewi/
> I have decided not to release or maintain stable versions, so this
> package is no longer useful.

Removed, thanks.

Regards,
Felix Yan

signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

[aur-general] Removal request: pcf-tewi

[Lucy hi]

pcf-tewi: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/pcf-tewi/
I have decided not to release or maintain stable versions, so this
package is no longer useful.

Re: [aur-general] [Removal Request] lightworks

[Karol Blazewicz]

On Mon, Feb 3, 2014 at 11:47 PM, Jeremy Audet  wrote:
>> Yeah, but Arch Linux TUs seem to prefer "project name" than "package name
> proposed by the upstream". I have recently reported an issue stating that
> it's not possible to find PowerDNS with pacman -Ss powerdns.
>
> Excellent point. The principle of least surprise would dictate that
> packages have obvious names light lightworks or powerdns.

Status?
There still are two packages:
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?K=lightworks

[aur-general] Disown Request

[David J. Haines]

Please disown yeganesh so that I can pick it up. I contacted the
maintainer via e-mail two weeks ago, to no response.

Here's the link:

https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/yeganesh/

Thanks!

--
David J. Haines
djhai...@gmx.com
0xAFB3D16D - F929 270F B7C3 78AE A741  434F A7C6 F264 AFB3 D16C


pgpRbeiy_nd1V.pgp
Description: PGP signature

[aur-general] Not interested in maintaining gnash anymore

[Jan Alexander Steffens]

Is anyone interested in taking it from my hands?
-- Weitergeleitete Nachricht --
Von: "Community Packages" 
Datum: 24.02.2014 17:23
Betreff: FS#39000: [gnash-gtk] Needs rebuilt against new version of boost
An: 
Cc:

THIS IS AN AUTOMATED MESSAGE, DO NOT REPLY.

The following task has been changed.  The changes are listed below.  For
full information about what has changed, visit the URL and click the
History tab.

FS#39000 - [gnash-gtk] Needs rebuilt against new version of boost
User who did this: Doug Newgard (Scimmia)
Architecture: All -> i686
Status: Waiting on Response -> Assigned
Severity: Low -> High
Assigned To: [-] -> Jan Steffens

More information can be found at the following URL:
https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/39000

You are receiving this message because you have requested it from the
Flyspray bugtracking system.  If you did not expect this message or don't
want to receive mails in future, you can change your notification settings
at the URL shown above.

Re: [aur-general] Package with arch-depending source

[Ismael Bouya]

> Sure, it can't hurt having it documented, please do.

I wanted to add it to the "Arch Packaging Standards" in the Architectures
section, but...
"You do not have permission to edit this page, for the following reason:
This page has been protected to prevent editing or other actions."

And I just found out that it is implicitly mentionned in the PKBUILD page
(That we can access to the CARCH variable), but that's definitely not where
I would expect to find this kind of information if I'm trying to think of
how to do things correctly...

-- 
Ismael


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Re: [aur-general] Package with arch-depending source

[Maxime Gauduin]

On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 10:53 AM, Ismael Bouya
wrote:

> (Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 10:46:48AM +0100) Maxime Gauduin :
> > Yes it is, see the nvidia package for instance:
> >
> https://projects.archlinux.org/svntogit/packages.git/tree/trunk/PKGBUILD?h=packages/nvidia
>
> Of course... It is always when I try to find an example file that I cannot
> find one... Thanks!
>
> Should I maybe add a section for this kind of example on the wiki?
> --
> Ismael
>

Sure, it can't hurt having it documented, please do.

-- 
Maxime

Re: [aur-general] Package with arch-depending source

[Ismael Bouya]

(Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 10:46:48AM +0100) Maxime Gauduin :
> Yes it is, see the nvidia package for instance:
> https://projects.archlinux.org/svntogit/packages.git/tree/trunk/PKGBUILD?h=packages/nvidia

Of course... It is always when I try to find an example file that I cannot
find one... Thanks!

Should I maybe add a section for this kind of example on the wiki?
-- 
Ismael


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Re: [aur-general] Package with arch-depending source

[Maxime Gauduin]

On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 10:42 AM, Ismael Bouya
wrote:

> Hi,
>
> I'm maintaining a package in the AUR whose source is "arch-depending"
> (anaconda)
>
> For the moment I deal with that by putting the x86_64 version in the
> source/md5 array and adding a
> if [ "$CARCH" == "i686" ] (...)
> just after to modify it.
>
> Is that the usual way to do that? Or how should it be done? I see no
> information about that in the AUR guidelines.
> --
> Ismael
>

Yes it is, see the nvidia package for instance:
https://projects.archlinux.org/svntogit/packages.git/tree/trunk/PKGBUILD?h=packages/nvidia

Cheers,
-- 
Maxime

[aur-general] Package with arch-depending source

[Ismael Bouya]

Hi,

I'm maintaining a package in the AUR whose source is "arch-depending"
(anaconda)

For the moment I deal with that by putting the x86_64 version in the
source/md5 array and adding a
if [ "$CARCH" == "i686" ] (...) 
just after to modify it. 

Is that the usual way to do that? Or how should it be done? I see no
information about that in the AUR guidelines.
-- 
Ismael


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]

[Arch Website Notification]

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] ===
https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/

There are currently:
* 0 new packages in last 24 hours
* 0 known bad packages
* 0 packages not accepting signoffs
* 0 fully signed off packages
* 4 packages missing signoffs
* 2 packages older than 14 days

(Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by
pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one
package per architecture, even if it is a split package.)



== Incomplete signoffs for [community] (4 total) ==

* exim-4.82-2 (i686)
0/1 signoffs
* python2-systemd-209-1 (i686)
0/1 signoffs
* exim-4.82-2 (x86_64)
0/2 signoffs
* python2-systemd-209-1 (x86_64)
0/2 signoffs


== All packages in [community-testing] for more than 14 days (2 total) ==

* exim-4.82-2 (i686), since 2014-02-06
* exim-4.82-2 (x86_64), since 2014-02-06


== Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours ==

1. fyan - 8 signoffs
2. bpiotrowski - 5 signoffs
3. bisson - 2 signoffs
4. thomas - 2 signoffs
5. djgera - 1 signoffs

Re: [aur-general] deletion request: pylint-python3

[Maxime Gauduin]

On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 1:31 AM, Jeremy Audet  wrote:

> Please delete pylint-python3 [1]. It is out of date, incorrectly named and
> a duplicate of python-pylint [2].
>
> [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/pylint-python3/
> [2] https://www.archlinux.org/packages/extra/any/python-pylint/
>
> --Jeremy
>

Deleted, thx.

-- 
Maxime

Re: [aur-general] removal request: girlfriend

[mail]

Can I have it?