Re: [aur-general] Merge Request
On Friday, March 07, 2014 11:38:02 Chi Hsuan Yen wrote: > Please merge: > > https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/flex-sdk/ > > into: > > https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/apache-flex-sdk/ > > The original Adobe Flex SDK project is now maintained by Apache Software > Foundation, and the latest version is 4.11.0, which is officially supported > on Linux. Merged, thanks. Regards, Felix Yan signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Re: [aur-general] Axiom (CAS) -- Same program, three packages (and licenses)?
Am 16.01.2014 23:24, schrieb oliver: Hello, I looked up some information... Axiom has been forked in 2007 into FriCAS and OpenAxiom. yes So, Axiom and OpenAxiom are the same. no, that conclusion is false. Both projects exist and are more or less active. They are even using different programming languages internally (Arcor vs SPAD). Nevertheless there are two AUR-packages with OpenAxiom, and the mentioned licenses (in the package description) differ. How will such a case be handled? The wrong one should (GPL) be changed by the maintainer. Ciao, Oliver
[aur-general] merge request - you-get-git
Please merge python-you-get-git[1] into you-get-git[2] as it's used primarily as a tool, not as a library. [1]: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/python-you-get-git/ [2]: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/you-get-git/ -- Best regards, lilydjwg
Re: [aur-general] Move vagrant and ceph to [community]?
+1 for vagrant, it's really useful! -1 for ceph, I experienced data loss last time I tried it on a small test-cluster. (Reported a bug. It's probably fixed now, but I still don't trust it). Jonathan, if you should be interested in feedback/comments/PKGBUILD testing in connection with vagrant, I would be happy to help out. -- Sincerely, Alexander Rødseth xyproto / TU
Re: [aur-general] Move vagrant and ceph to [community]?
On 07/03/2014 17:26, Alexander Rødseth wrote: > -1 for ceph, I experienced data loss last time I tried it on a small > test-cluster. (Reported a bug. It's probably fixed now, but I still > don't trust it). > I support adding Ceph. There are professional appliances based on Ceph. We have a cluster running (in my company) since one year and we didn't have lost any data. Here, using it in production is not the point. Having Ceph in community would help to test and use remote cluster from Arch. So, +1. Cheers, -- Sébastien "Seblu" Luttringer https://seblu.net | Twitter: @seblu42 GPG: 0x2072D77A signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
[aur-general] [Merge Request] qwtpolar and qwtpolar-svn
Afternoon TU's. Seeking guidance and advice, I'd like to propose that qwtpolar-svn[1] be merged into qwtpolar[2] in the AUR if I'm following procedures properly here =) I'm trying to clean these qwtpolar packages up a bit. They were both recently orphaned so I upgraded qwtpolar[2] to latest release which is also the same as qwtpolar-svn[1]. SaultDon [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/qwtpolar-svn/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/qwtpolar/
Re: [aur-general] [Merge Request] qwtpolar and qwtpolar-svn
> Date: Fri, 7 Mar 2014 11:00:13 -0700 > From: sault@gmail.com > To: aur-general@archlinux.org > Subject: [aur-general] [Merge Request] qwtpolar and qwtpolar-svn > > Afternoon TU's. > > Seeking guidance and advice, I'd like to propose that qwtpolar-svn[1] > be merged into qwtpolar[2] in the AUR if I'm following procedures > properly here =) > > I'm trying to clean these qwtpolar packages up a bit. > > They were both recently orphaned so I upgraded qwtpolar[2] to latest > release which is also the same as qwtpolar-svn[1]. > > > > > SaultDon > > [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/qwtpolar-svn/ > [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/qwtpolar/ 1. They are not the same, one pulls from a branch, the other pulls from trunk. 2. When pulling from trunk, -svn is the correct name. 3. You are using a very old PKGBUILD template. Please see https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/VCS_PKGBUILD_Guidelines
Re: [aur-general] merge request - you-get-git
On Fri, Mar 7, 2014 at 2:48 PM, lilydjwg wrote: > Please merge python-you-get-git[1] into you-get-git[2] as it's used > primarily as a tool, not as a library. > > [1]: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/python-you-get-git/ > [2]: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/you-get-git/ > > -- > Best regards, > lilydjwg Merged.
Re: [aur-general] Move vagrant and ceph to [community]?
I notice that the AUR ceph package installs non-systemd initscripts, would moving this package to community upset some of the anti-systemd users, or would the non-systemd initscripts be kept as a part of the package or split off to an independent AUR package? In any case, I'd like to see ceph re-uploaded with devtools-friendly files (i.e. 644 permissions instead of 600). The inclusion into community/ would be nice, if only because ceph takes a relatively long time to compile. Cheers, WorMzy
[aur-general] Merge requests
Hello, Please merge/delete the following: Merge haxe-svn [https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/haxe-svn] into haxe-git [ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/haxe-git] (upstream switched to git) Merge htop-svn [https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/htop-svn] into htop-git [ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/htop-git] (upstream switched to git) Delete https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/osgocean-git/ (or possible merge into [https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/osgocean-git/]. According to maintainers comment, it was uploaded by mistake and should have been an svn-package. The packages has no votes and no comments except for one saying it was accidently uploaded as a -git package. Best regards,
