Re: [aur-general] Unannounced and unreasonable deletion of python2-vdirsyncer
Hello Lukas, > The mailing list is aur-requests, see [1]. Yes, sorry. It has been quite a while since i got involved with the AUR, i think aur-requests wasn't around back then. > > Packages cannot be restored after merging. Packages can be resubmitted > at any time, though. You may want to consider renaming it to > python-vdirsyncer before doing so. I think you misread this: - python2-vdirsyncer contains the Python 2 variant - vdirsyncer contains the Python 3 variant - python2-vdirsyncer was accidentally deleted > > > Thanks, > > Markus > > > > [1] > https://lists.archlinux.org/pipermail/aur-requests/2014-September/001819.html
Re: [aur-general] Unannounced and unreasonable deletion of python2-vdirsyncer
Hi Evgeniy, On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 04:20:37PM +0400, Evgeniy Alekseev wrote: > If you was a maintainer you would have to be notified. There was a request > [1] > and there was no any discussion there. But really, it is my mistake because > vdirsyncer provides only python3 library and there are packages which require > python2 library. I've uploaded the python2-vdirsyncer back and have disowned > it. > > 1. > https://lists.archlinux.org/pipermail/aur-requests/2014-September/001819.html I didn't see that (only looked on aur-general), sorry for the tone then. I am not the maintainer, and seing this request from the maintainer of both packages surprises me quite a bit. So i think the current status (keeping both packages) is fine, the maintainer probably made a mistake. Thanks, Markus pgpWGWtkQwbMB.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: [aur-general] Unannounced and unreasonable deletion of python2-vdirsyncer
On Mon, 29 Sep 2014 at 13:57:07, Markus Unterwaditzer wrote: > Hello everybody, > > Today i was notified by the AUR system that somebody called "arcanis" silently > merged the package "python2-vdirsyncer" into "vdirsyncer", leaving other > packages with missing dependencies. > > Vdirsyncer runs under both Python 2 and 3. It can be used as a library, but is > more commonly used as a CLI tool. The Python 2 version was required by > khal-git, as Khal doesn't work under Python 3. The Python 3 version still > resides under the package name "vdirsyncer" and is there for the sake of > completeness, and because Python 3 is technically the most up-to-date version > of Python. It can be used independently of khal. > > khal-git: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/khal-git/ > vdirsyncer: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/vdirsyncer/ > > I also couldn't find a mailinglist about this, therefore i assume this is a > mistake. Please restore the package "python2-vdirsyncer". > The mailing list is aur-requests, see [1]. Packages cannot be restored after merging. Packages can be resubmitted at any time, though. You may want to consider renaming it to python-vdirsyncer before doing so. > Thanks, > Markus > [1] https://lists.archlinux.org/pipermail/aur-requests/2014-September/001819.html
Re: [aur-general] Unannounced and unreasonable deletion of python2-vdirsyncer
Hi, On Monday 29 September 2014 13:57:07 Markus Unterwaditzer wrote: > Today i was notified by the AUR system that somebody called "arcanis" > silently merged the package "python2-vdirsyncer" into "vdirsyncer", leaving > other packages with missing dependencies. > > Vdirsyncer runs under both Python 2 and 3. It can be used as a library, but > is more commonly used as a CLI tool. The Python 2 version was required by > khal-git, as Khal doesn't work under Python 3. The Python 3 version still > resides under the package name "vdirsyncer" and is there for the sake of > completeness, and because Python 3 is technically the most up-to-date > version of Python. It can be used independently of khal. > > khal-git: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/khal-git/ > vdirsyncer: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/vdirsyncer/ > > I also couldn't find a mailinglist about this, therefore i assume this is a > mistake. Please restore the package "python2-vdirsyncer". Seems somebody called 'arcanis' is I =) If you was a maintainer you would have to be notified. There was a request [1] and there was no any discussion there. But really, it is my mistake because vdirsyncer provides only python3 library and there are packages which require python2 library. I've uploaded the python2-vdirsyncer back and have disowned it. 1. https://lists.archlinux.org/pipermail/aur-requests/2014-September/001819.html -- С уважением, Е.Алексеев. Sincerely yours, E.Alekseev. e-mail: darkarca...@mail.ru ICQ: 407-398-235 Jabber: arca...@jabber.ru signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
[aur-general] Unannounced and unreasonable deletion of python2-vdirsyncer
Hello everybody, Today i was notified by the AUR system that somebody called "arcanis" silently merged the package "python2-vdirsyncer" into "vdirsyncer", leaving other packages with missing dependencies. Vdirsyncer runs under both Python 2 and 3. It can be used as a library, but is more commonly used as a CLI tool. The Python 2 version was required by khal-git, as Khal doesn't work under Python 3. The Python 3 version still resides under the package name "vdirsyncer" and is there for the sake of completeness, and because Python 3 is technically the most up-to-date version of Python. It can be used independently of khal. khal-git: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/khal-git/ vdirsyncer: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/vdirsyncer/ I also couldn't find a mailinglist about this, therefore i assume this is a mistake. Please restore the package "python2-vdirsyncer". Thanks, Markus
Re: [aur-general] package removal request
On 29/09/14 04:31 AM, Antonio wrote: > This: > https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/sdl-nobackingstore/ > Should be removed because the arch package includes the nobackingstore > patch. > Thanks Please flag for deletion next time. signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
[aur-general] package removal request
This: https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/sdl-nobackingstore/ Should be removed because the arch package includes the nobackingstore patch. Thanks
[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 12 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 17 packages missing signoffs * 1 package older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == New packages in [community-testing] in last 24 hours (12 total) == * cairo-dock-3.3.2.r1818-1 (i686) * cairo-dock-plugins-3.3.2.r3121-1 (i686) * giggle-0.7-3 (i686) * nemiver-0.9.5-3 (i686) * remmina-1.0.0-13 (i686) * simple-scan-3.14.0-1 (i686) * cairo-dock-3.3.2.r1818-1 (x86_64) * cairo-dock-plugins-3.3.2.r3121-1 (x86_64) * giggle-0.7-3 (x86_64) * nemiver-0.9.5-3 (x86_64) * remmina-1.0.0-13 (x86_64) * simple-scan-3.14.0-1 (x86_64) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (17 total) == * freevo-1.9.0-14 (any) 0/2 signoffs * cairo-dock-3.3.2.r1818-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * cairo-dock-plugins-3.3.2.r3121-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * giggle-0.7-3 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * gnome-boxes-3.14.0-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * nemiver-0.9.5-3 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * remmina-1.0.0-13 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * simple-scan-3.14.0-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * weston-1.6.0-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * cairo-dock-3.3.2.r1818-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * cairo-dock-plugins-3.3.2.r3121-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * giggle-0.7-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * gnome-boxes-3.14.0-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * nemiver-0.9.5-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * remmina-1.0.0-13 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * simple-scan-3.14.0-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * weston-1.6.0-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == All packages in [community-testing] for more than 14 days (1 total) == * freevo-1.9.0-14 (any), since 2014-08-27 == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. foutrelis - 6 signoffs
