Re: [aur-general] forgot email
On Thu 03 Nov 2016 at 18:53, Markus Bockhacker wrote: > Hi guys, > > seems like i forgot my email/pw combo. I know I registered one in the time > around the aur4 switch... > > My Username on the forums is "s1lvester" (same email as this one). Can > someone help me out and change the email to this one so I can reset the > passwd? Confirmed email off-list. -- Jonathan Steel
Re: [aur-general] Out-of-date notifications
On Fri, 23 Oct 2015 14:29:16 +0100 WorMzy Tykashi <wormzy.tyka...@gmail.com> wrote: > I've noticed the same problem -- someone had flagged one of my > packages OOD four or five days ago, but I only just noticed today > after checking my packages on the web interface. My email is correct, > and I am still receiving comment notifications on the packages I am > subscribed to, I simply have no record of anyone flagging my package > out-of-date. That might explain why there are so many packages that I use that are marked out of date and have been for a bit: warning: cargo-bin is flagged out of date warning: google-chrome is flagged out of date warning: rssguard is flagged out of date warning: xjobs is flagged out of date And why the qt5-doc package is still out of date and breaking dependencies. -- Jonathan ArnoldWebstream: http://hieronymus.soup.io If you want to go fast, go alone. If you want to go far, you need a team ~ John Wooden
Re: [aur-general] max blob size exceeded
Thank you. Sent in a separate email. On Fri, Aug 28, 2015 at 4:06 PM, Storm Dragon stormdragon2...@gmail.com wrote: Howdy, If you need somewhere to host it, I can do that for you. Just send me the file and I'll send you the link. HTH Storm On Fri, Aug 28, 2015 at 10:55:13PM +0200, Noel Kuntze wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Hello Jonathan, Host the patch somewhere (Not Dropbox or on a Pastebin). - -- Mit freundlichen Grüßen/Kind Regards, Noel Kuntze GPG Key ID: 0x63EC6658 Fingerprint: 23CA BB60 2146 05E7 7278 6592 3839 298F 63EC 6658 -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2 iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJV4MqvAAoJEDg5KY9j7GZYdfEP+gPnsrt37oRGma2PIeTXYSYD WG9UwLZyqzugGxMTadtd/KAemP266Rf8M29MTv6E8eZSrQ/qjQOM1LdFxrQNxmX4 1z7rduKxpGMZgHfGQRk0kFKjr4O2/xU9Vyq5VpsGxRw9afYUUGXqRH8OI5EI98Op gySmUHMP3QmBM/33rWC4T7ij+puSmNrhsiRwnnnmjB1ewr25SWWQAsbNdRO3qo9L Nym5jjILEMcIzGSgapS34DF8YtMUyWMVnAD7sHNzuhqr+Sj+hlJBoFfsfJfjM8CG DUXC1jSDpPss3ktLGvvZgSb/b69OfPozQxH1yf/n1O/J1jHpDNw8eGmT655rssoO zx791tXPq/E2n0XxqgkNTUznIw9LTSvJLKqCVv7MXDth3Sr3W7AX8X6azsSxy23z KwB+qMQmwylNvBlEUIkZZEndgbxWUpdhEgFQHUTdTqZigiupafxTRy8C/8xyoMSn hue4n3oUTyOxqIcWa6WIfOzgFQlXEbRHG4X1hn4p8iOAUNmqwTj3HCzYVhprJcuT EewhS6SQKHMMYi7ejrpdCCUFIf7glShGcw6SWKI4tDP+rzKJDkSetWXcikB6cDEg 7uUkphvSyAPUe0OkHDtNT/ZY4YlcKASgySoLkXS81pDtzr47R857POtNrorOHXuS AlviaJN7Ctui4s6HgDn7 =t4Go -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- Powered by Arch Linux! I am registered Linux user number 508465: https://linuxcounter.net/user/508465.html My blog, Thoughts of a Dragon: http://www.stormdragon.tk/ get my public PGP key: gpg --keyserver wwwkeys.pgp.net --recv-key 43DDC193 Free and open source social networking, get your account TODAY! http://social.2mb.solutions/main/register Follow me on GNU Social: https://social.stormdragon.tk/storm Brains for dinner, brains for lunch, brains for breakfast, brains for brunch. Brains at every single meal, why can't we have some guts? The Misfits - Braineaters -- Thanks, Jonathan Kotta Hofstadter's Law: It always takes longer than you expect, even when you take into account Hofstadter's Law.
[aur-general] max blob size exceeded
I'm trying to submit avr-binutils-atmel from AUR3. It has a +600kB patch file that exceeds the size limit. Please increase the limit or tell me how to work around this. -- Thanks, Jonathan Kotta Hofstadter's Law: It always takes longer than you expect, even when you take into account Hofstadter's Law.
Re: [aur-general] Ho to update .SRCINFO without creating a tarball?
On Sat, 23 May 2015 11:34:38 +0200 Manuel Reimer manuel.rei...@gmx.de wrote: Hello, I'm doing my first steps with AUR 4.0 and I'm asked to commit both, PKGBUILD and .SRCINFO. .SRCINFO is automatically created with makepkg --source, but there is no need for a tarball when pushing to GIT. So what I think that would be useful is something like makepkg --upgradesrcinfo or something like that. I something like this already available? Manuel I'd be happy if there was at least a reasonable description of .SCRINFO on the wiki. There's a glossy version here: https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Arch_User_Repository#AUR_metadata But there should be more, given that it is so important. It should have its own page, like PKGBUILD does. And someone who knows it far better than I should create it. -- Jonathan ArnoldWebstream: http://hieronymus.soup.io If you want to go fast, go alone. If you want to go far, you need a team ~ John Wooden
Re: [aur-general] Ho to update .SRCINFO without creating a tarball?
On Wed, 27 May 2015 16:25:13 +0200 Marcel Korpel marcel.kor...@gmail.com wrote: * Jonathan Arnold jdarn...@buddydog.org (Wed, 27 May 2015 07:56:20 -0400): I'd be happy if there was at least a reasonable description of .SCRINFO on the wiki. There's a glossy version here: https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Arch_User_Repository#AUR_metadata But there should be more, given that it is so important. It should have its own page, like PKGBUILD does. Why do you need such a description? It just contains the metadata in PKGBUILD and you really shouldn't create or change it yourself. Best, Marcel Well, for one, there's no mention on the wiki on how to generate this file. For another, it seems pretty easy to generate by hand, as the description indicates (nowhere does it say it gets generated). -- Jonathan ArnoldWebstream: http://hieronymus.soup.io If you want to go fast, go alone. If you want to go far, you need a team ~ John Wooden
Re: [aur-general] Community package [scratch] marked out-of-date
On Sat 14 Mar 2015 at 14:05, Arch Website Notification wrote: [...] wants to notify you that the following packages may be out-of-date: * scratch 1.4.0.7-5 [community] (i686): https://www.archlinux.org/packages/community/i686/scratch/ * scratch 1.4.0.7-5 [community] (x86_64): https://www.archlinux.org/packages/community/x86_64/scratch/ The user provided the following additional text: 2.0 is out http://scratch.mit.edu/scratch2download/ Someone can create scratch2 in the AUR, as version 2 looks like it depends on adobe-air (in the AUR) and I'm not willing to support that in the official repos, and I don't have any interest in the new version anyway. Thanks, -- Jonathan Steel
Re: [aur-general] AUR Comment for customizepkg-ald
On Tue 25 Nov 2014 at 23:13, Daniel Albers wrote: [...] There are thousands of AUR packages that are variants of other packages and I can't see any problem with that. In my understanding that's part of what AUR is for. Is it not? It's been customary for AUR deletions, orphanings etc. to have a two weeks grace period. Should that not also apply to TUs? The .tar.gz that you mentioned that violated the no binaries on AUR rule contained nothing but ASCII files (as does customizepk¹). If I unzip the tarball and re-upload it, does that not violate the rule? What if I also untar it and upload each text file individually? [...] I am generally conservative when it comes to package deletions, but I saw this as having two big problems; being a duplicate of another AUR package, and including the tarball. The PKGBUILD was identical (apart from a version bump and pkgname/pkgbase). The package was a patched version of customizepkg. You must have included a modified tarball then, as there were no patches. If you want to fork the project then host the source elsewhere; then it will not be seen as a duplicate package. The AUR is not for hosting projects, but for providing build files for packages. -- Jonathan Steel
Re: [aur-general] Merge Request: nagios-nsca and nsca
On 2014-10-07 06:14, Phillip Smith wrote: jsteel recently merged nagios-nrpe with nrpe and was going to do the same with nagios-nsca and nsca but the latter hasn't been done. Could someone please action? Sorry I didn't see your reply. Done. -- Jonathan Steel
Re: [aur-general] AUR 3.3.0 released
On Wed, 09 Jul 2014 16:34:20 +0200 Nowaker enwuk...@gmail.com wrote: I think it's ok for maintainers to opt out in case there's too much discussion in the comments, but at least they should receive a daily digest by default which they shouldn't be optional. The maintainer has to care about the discussion about their package. Disable notifications should point to Disown package. trollface/ I agree with this sentiment. If a package owner finds the occasional email comment about their package to be too much of a bother, sounds like disowning is in order. I don't think you should be able to unsubscribe from the email. And if the email bounces, the package should be automagically disowned. -- Jonathan ArnoldWebstream: http://hieronymus.soup.io If you want to go fast, go alone. If you want to go far, you need a team ~ John Wooden
Re: [aur-general] PKGBUILD removal request
On Thu, 19 Jun 2014 15:30:01 +0200 sinma eichi...@mailoo.org wrote: Hi, I have uploaded a PKGBUILD but I want it to be deleted because I made a mistake about his name. Can you remove it please? Thanks by advance, Name and URL for the package? -- Jonathan ArnoldWebstream: http://hieronymus.soup.io If you want to go fast, go alone. If you want to go far, you need a team ~ John Wooden
Re: [aur-general] Move vagrant to [community]?
On Wed 19 Mar 2014 at 21:45, Jonathan Steel wrote: On Mon 17 Mar 2014 at 20:00, Jonathan Steel wrote: On Tue 11 Mar 2014 at 19:48, Jonathan Steel wrote: [...] I plan to move this to [community] in a day or two assuming no further issues are reported. It has come to my attention that two plugins are included in vagrant that don't fall under the MIT license. These are vagrant-login and vagrant-share. Here is the license for those: https://gist.github.com/mitchellh/c070cf243b94036bb291 Are there any objections to providing these proprietary plugins with this license? I've decided to remove these plugins in 1.5.1-5. Users can install them with: % vagrant plugin install vagrant-login % vagrant plugin install vagrant-share ... and functionality will be restored, without having to distribute proprietary software, and this license. The plugins will then be stored in ~/.vagrant.d/gems/gems/ (so will be user-specific) and are not fetched from our servers. I think this is the best solution for those wanting to use these plugins. -- Jonathan Steel pgpDXNFCEqK_G.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: [aur-general] Move vagrant to [community]?
On Mon 17 Mar 2014 at 20:00, Jonathan Steel wrote: On Tue 11 Mar 2014 at 19:48, Jonathan Steel wrote: [...] I plan to move this to [community] in a day or two assuming no further issues are reported. It has come to my attention that two plugins are included in vagrant that don't fall under the MIT license. These are vagrant-login and vagrant-share. Here is the license for those: https://gist.github.com/mitchellh/c070cf243b94036bb291 Are there any objections to providing these proprietary plugins with this license? Thanks, -- Jonathan Steel pgpUFhQ2lmwkC.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: [aur-general] [Removal Request] lightworks
On Fri 14 Mar 2014 at 17:36, Pyro Devil wrote: Hi again! I just wanted to remind you that my request for removal of my package still exists. ;) Deleted, thanks. Sorry for the delay; not sure why this was overlooked. Am Montag, den 03.02.2014, 14:19 +0100 schrieb Pyro Devil: Hi! I am the author of https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/lightworks/ and request removal because of duplication. When I created the package I didn't see that: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/lwks already exists. Thanks! Pyro Devil -- Jonathan Steel pgpwUmmdC_dBd.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: [aur-general] [Removal Request] lightworks
On Mon 17 Mar 2014 at 18:37, Jonathan Steel wrote: On Mon 17 Mar 2014 at 19:24, Nowaker wrote: I just wanted to remind you that my request for removal of my package still exists. ;) Deleted, thanks. Sorry for the delay; not sure why this was overlooked. There was a discussion about the package name; and the suggested move was to removing lightworks, and move existing lwks into lightworks. The official package (deb) name is lwks, and lightworks is in the description. I see no reason to change it. On second thoughts, maybe it should be listed as lightworks, but the maintainer should upload it under the new name and then request a merge here. Now lightworks is gone, he is able to. -- Jonathan Steel pgpHKygqNLmQn.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: [aur-general] Move vagrant to [community]?
On Tue 11 Mar 2014 at 19:48, Jonathan Steel wrote: On Fri 21 Feb 2014 at 19:34, Jonathan Steel wrote: On Fri 21 Feb 2014 at 12:51, Ido Rosen wrote: Hi, I maintain vagrant package in AUR. I believe vagrant is a very useful tool for ArchLinux users. I am happy to continue maintaining it in AUR; however, for the good of the community, it would be great if one of you TUs could move vagrant into [community] as soon as possible so it could get wider exposure. It currently has ~147 votes. Releases are infrequent, so it has been very easy to maintain overall. AUR package: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/vagrant/ Upstream distribution website: http://www.vagrantup.com/ [...] I use this a bit and was considering moving it to community when I had a bit more time. If no one steps up in the next week or so then I'll start looking at moving it/the best way to package it. Vagrant has been updated in the AUR using my proposed installation method (not using the rpm file). This means needing 22 ruby-* packages. Please share comments/suggestions/concerns either here or in the comments: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/vagrant/ I plan to move it to [community] along with dependencies by the end of the week, unless concerns/issues arise. The gem-based install did have issues. With help from a few users a version that uses vagrant-installers is now available. This does not have the 22 ruby-* dependencies but it is now a large self-contained package in /opt/, much like the rpm version was. I plan to move this to [community] in a day or two assuming no further issues are reported. -- Jonathan Steel pgpyW6OfHfD3X.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: [aur-general] Move vagrant to [community]?
On Fri 21 Feb 2014 at 19:34, Jonathan Steel wrote: On Fri 21 Feb 2014 at 12:51, Ido Rosen wrote: Hi, I maintain vagrant package in AUR. I believe vagrant is a very useful tool for ArchLinux users. I am happy to continue maintaining it in AUR; however, for the good of the community, it would be great if one of you TUs could move vagrant into [community] as soon as possible so it could get wider exposure. It currently has ~147 votes. Releases are infrequent, so it has been very easy to maintain overall. AUR package: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/vagrant/ Upstream distribution website: http://www.vagrantup.com/ [...] I use this a bit and was considering moving it to community when I had a bit more time. If no one steps up in the next week or so then I'll start looking at moving it/the best way to package it. Vagrant has been updated in the AUR using my proposed installation method (not using the rpm file). This means needing 22 ruby-* packages. Please share comments/suggestions/concerns either here or in the comments: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/vagrant/ I plan to move it to [community] along with dependencies by the end of the week, unless concerns/issues arise. Thanks, -- Jonathan Steel pgpQtdcpwd50Z.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: [aur-general] Move vagrant and ceph to [community]?
On Wed 05 Mar 2014 at 11:29, Ido Rosen wrote: [...] Note that for vagrant, you really should use vagrant-installers, rather than using gems/bundler directly for it, if you're going to create a package. Maybe the right way is to add support to vagrant-installers for PKGBUILDs. [...] I have started looking at the best way to package it. I'll propose my changes to you once I'm happy with it and if you would be happy to maintain it in the AUR for a little time (or I could take over it) to allow people to test the changes before moving it to [community] I think that would be best. In future please reply inline and to the original thread. Thanks, -- Jonathan Steel pgpwO_Lg0hYox.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: [aur-general] Move vagrant and ceph to [community]?
On Wed 05 Mar 2014 at 20:21, Jonathan Steel wrote: On Wed 05 Mar 2014 at 11:29, Ido Rosen wrote: [...] Note that for vagrant, you really should use vagrant-installers, rather than using gems/bundler directly for it, if you're going to create a package. Maybe the right way is to add support to vagrant-installers for PKGBUILDs. [...] I have started looking at the best way to package it. I'll propose my changes to you once I'm happy with it and if you would be happy to maintain it in the AUR for a little time (or I could take over it) to allow people to test the changes before moving it to [community] I think that would be best. [...] What's your opinion on how the packages ruby-vagrant and vagrant-git do it? Before I even looked at those, that's the approach I was going for. -- Jonathan Steel pgpjcrWGhK_o0.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: [aur-general] Move vagrant to [community]?
On Fri 21 Feb 2014 at 12:51, Ido Rosen wrote: Hi, I maintain vagrant package in AUR. I believe vagrant is a very useful tool for ArchLinux users. I am happy to continue maintaining it in AUR; however, for the good of the community, it would be great if one of you TUs could move vagrant into [community] as soon as possible so it could get wider exposure. It currently has ~147 votes. Releases are infrequent, so it has been very easy to maintain overall. AUR package: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/vagrant/ Upstream distribution website: http://www.vagrantup.com/ Also, if you'd like to make changes to the PKGBUILD in AUR, you can submit a pull request on GitHub: https://github.com/ido/packages-archlinux (under the aur/vagrant directory). I use this a bit and was considering moving it to community when I had a bit more time. If no one steps up in the next week or so then I'll start looking at moving it/the best way to package it. -- Jonathan Steel pgpuv9yAJmdO2.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: [aur-general] Merge request: sm-ssc-hg into stepmania-git
On Sat 08 Feb 2014 at 18:49, Devin J. Pohly wrote: Please merge sm-ssc-hg [0] (orphaned) into stepmania-git [1]. StepMania development has moved to GitHub, and the sm-ssc name is long outdated. 0: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/sm-ssc-hg/ 1: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/stepmania-git/ Merged, thanks. -- Jonathan Steel pgpBxURPdziQt.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: [aur-general] AUR Requests
On Sun 02 Feb 2014 at 13:24, Rob McCathie wrote: On Sun, Feb 2, 2014 at 10:53 AM, Michael Schubert mschu@gmail.com wrote: Hi, (Maintainers, if any, are in CC.) Could you please merge: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/python2-imaging/ - https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/python2-imaging-alt/ ** Reason: PIL is being phased out by pillow; 1st is orphan and 2nd one not to be replaced like in [community] Maintainer: please add a replaces=() flag, it should replace python2-imaging and not python-imaging [...] I agree python2-imaging should be deleted or merged into python2-imaging-alt I don't agree that this should happen. since when a user installs python2-imaging the next time they go to system update pacman of course offers to replace it with python2-pillow. (Yes I know they /could/ just use IgnorePkg= in pacman.conf) I do agree this is what you should do if you want to continue using it, rather than upload an incorrectly named, duplicate package. I will remove python2-imaging-alt. -- Jonathan Steel pgp7E0otGza6w.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: [aur-general] AUR Requests
On Sat 01 Feb 2014 at 23:53, Michael Schubert wrote: Hi, (Maintainers, if any, are in CC.) Could you please merge: [...] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/python2-socksipy-branch/ - https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/python2-socks/ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/python-socksipy-branch/ ** - https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/python-socks/ Reason: socksipy and -branch are dead, socks is maintained and has same API Maintainer: please let me know if you'd like to maintain the new package/why we should keep a dead branch Merged. And remove: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/sundials25/ ** Reason: sundials=2.5 current and available, package installs into /usr directly and should not be used [...] Removed, thanks. -- Jonathan Steel pgpjeyyhJOb4v.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: [aur-general] Duplicate packages
On Fri 31 Jan 2014 at 22:35, Allen Li wrote: I just noticed that there are three packages for The Dark Mod game in the AUR: darkmod, v2.00-1, maintainer caemir doom3-darkmod, v1.08-1, orphan thedarkmod, v2.0-4, maintainer naelstrof I emailed the maintainers and the decision was to keep darkmod, the other two are now gone. Do we have a policy for handling such situations? It seems like it would be in everyone's best interests to merge into one package to minimize maintenance costs. If unsure, I would always speak to the maintainers first and see what they think the best thing to do is, then propose it here. -- Jonathan Steel pgpateo_INgMU.pgp Description: PGP signature
[aur-general] TU resignation
Hi everyone, I've been pretty busy lately and haven't been able to find the time to fix bugs and keep my packages up-to-date. Lately I haven't actually been using any of the packages I maintain, so I think the time has come to pass them on to someone with the time and motivation to maintain them. So, without further ado, I hereby tender my resignation as a TU. I wish you all the best and hope you continue doing the things which make Arch so great. Best, Jonathan P.S. I've had trouble getting GPG and gmail to play together, so I've attached the contents of this message and signed that instead of signing the email itself. -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi everyone, I've been pretty busy lately and haven't been able to find the time to fix bugs and keep my packages up-to-date. Lately I haven't actually been using any of the packages I maintain, so I think the time has come to pass them on to someone with the time and motivation to maintain them. So, without further ado, I hereby tender my resignation as a TU. I wish you all the best and hope you continue doing the things which make Arch so great. Best, Jonathan -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux) iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJStKaEAAoJEK9+94c8/Uu26OYIAIlPKg7TbXCLmpFlwgsE3i/h wBCzQnx7MCGNgBAZ3eDdFJR4txhZOtt740aO8O4ZhihUed/YR0lJwb72C6qP4dcf u5OIFFEdHF+iZqJ+34hPD7QkmVJUYxs+f5xeBlK4ETYNo3mtOU/SreyLLj7yviLG jz2e20tFK0sfOyeglKKJpMC8EOzn2ARufLPlZxV8TFUj0pN2uSOoT2Gm6Ifj2KRn SNv3PpZDitRwMfWRbxMOCSvHl8+KAKZwzKloEThSPFAzrjuSWyWb2+poDwE4YcRL McMBEyqC6jQNA0BTpZ6R3XYNbwgwFllkHij+ONKn4xd5R5Nrq7sRYzgGrZNUplA= =dxpV -END PGP SIGNATURE-
Re: [aur-general] Removal/Renaming Request
On Thu, 24 Oct 2013 17:18:18 -0002 Ronnie Andrew ronnieandre...@gmail.com wrote: I'm the new maintainer of the package: wxpython https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/wxpython-2.4.9.1/ This package should be renamed from wxpython-2.4.9.1 to wxpython-updates since its the development version of wxpython and submitting a new package for each version would not be ideal. Also, i mistakenly submitted a new package trying to update wxpython to a new version which should be deleted. https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/wxpython2.9.5.0/ Actually, there already is a wxpython in extra that does all this. It should be marked out of date, I would think. -- Jonathan ArnoldWebstream: http://hieronymus.soup.io If you want to go fast, go alone. If you want to go far, you need a team ~ John Wooden
[aur-general] python-sleekxmpp merge request
I'm the creator mainter for python-sleekxmpp-git : https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/python-sleekxmpp-git/ And I think it should be merged with python-sleekxmpp-devel : https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/python-sleekxmpp-devel/ Not sure why I created a new package, as the -devel, despite being misnamed, is pretty much the same thing I submitted about about a year later. I will request a few changes to the PKGBUILD once the merge happens, including, perhaps, resubmitting it as -git -- Jonathan ArnoldWebstream: http://hieronymus.soup.io If you want to go fast, go alone. If you want to go far, you need a team ~ John Wooden
Re: [aur-general] Removal request: funcy-git
On Tue 15 Oct 2013 at 12:11, Martti Kühne wrote: I failed at getting the package I made yesterday right. Please remove the old [0], as I'm preserving the comment here and there are no votes, either. New and corrected package is in [1]. [0] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/funcy-git/ Deleted. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/python-funcy-git/ -- Jonathan Steel
Re: [aur-general] orphan request: vim-badwolf-git
On Thu 17 Oct 2013 at 09:28, Jeremy Audet wrote: I'd like to maintain the vim-badwolf-git [1] package. I flagged the package out of date, posted a comment with a link to an updated package and emailed the maintainer two weeks ago. I've gotten no response. The maintainer last updated one of his 33 packages on June 1st. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/vim-badwolf-git/ Disowned. -- Jonathan Steel
Re: [aur-general] Request merge: flacon-hg into flacon-git
On Thu 17 Oct 2013 at 16:16, SpinFlo wrote: Hi Flacon move sources fron googlecode(mercurial) to github (git) please merge https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/flacon-hg/ into https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/flacon-git/ Done. -- Jonathan Steel
Re: [aur-general] Deletion request: mpd-applet
On Thu 17 Oct 2013 at 18:08, Florian Dejonckheere wrote: Please delete mpd-applet [1], upstream sources are gone. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/mpd-applet/ Deleted, thanks. -- Jonathan Steel
Re: [aur-general] AUR account username lost
On Sun 13 Oct 2013 at 09:05, Jake Aleemi wrote: Hello! This is my first time posting on this mailing list. My problem is that my AUR account username is not working. I tried restetting the password, but that didn't help. My email is: ja-...@comcast.net Is there some kind of database where I can get my username back? Thanks in advance! Replied off-list. -- Jonathan Steel pgp3hCYPtkIqj.pgp Description: PGP signature
[aur-general] Package delete request
Can you delete my package iceray-git[1]? I've re-uploaded it as iceray[2], as it is a Go package that just happens to be hosted on Github. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/iceray-git/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/iceray/ -- Jonathan ArnoldWebstream: http://hieronymus.soup.io If you want to go fast, go alone. If you want to go far, you need a team ~ John Wooden
Re: [aur-general] Delete request: pycharm
On Thu 26 Sep 2013 at 09:05, Jonas Heinrich wrote: Hey, please delete pycharm [1] since it's superseded by the packages pycharm-community and pycharm-professional. Regards, onny [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/pycharm/ Deleted, thanks. -- Jonathan Steel pgpkkOuO0C4K5.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: [aur-general] Ophan request - wordplay
On Fri 27 Sep 2013 at 09:32, Christos Nouskas wrote: Please orphan wordplay [0], it produces an empty package and needs fixing. The maintainer seems inactive. [0] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/wordplay They last updated a package two months ago. You must send an email to them directly and give them two weeks to respond. -- Jonathan Steel pgp3TLDX6KlNf.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: [aur-general] Removal request
On Sun 29 Sep 2013 at 04:27, lukpod wrote: Remove smokinguns-custom_mappack1[1]. The source of this package is not available anymore. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/smokinguns-custom_mappack1 Deleted, thanks. -- Jonathan Steel pgpKixyh2Ox9s.pgp Description: PGP signature
[aur-general] gkrellweather orphan
I'd like to take over the gkrellweather package. The maintainer is unresponsive and the PKGBUILD needs updating. https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/gkrellweather/ -- Thanks, Jonathan Kotta Hofstadter's Law: It always takes longer than you expect, even when you take into account Hofstadter's Law.
Re: [aur-general] Merge mmat-git into minecraft-map-auto-trim-git
On Fri 20 Sep 2013 at 13:33, Buce wrote: Please merge https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/mmat-git/ into https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/minecraft-map-auto-trim-git/ as I believe the latter more accurately reflects the upstream project's name. With no votes or comments to merge, deleted. Thanks, -- Jonathan Steel pgp1AGVBy3dge.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: [aur-general] Removal request: oss-hg
On Sat 21 Sep 2013 at 16:14, Nowaker wrote: Hi, I'd like oss-hg package removed from AUR. OSS does not use Mercurial for development now, so the name is out of date. Besides, the package didn't contain systemd units. Today I uploaded oss-git which is almost a 1:1 copy of oss from [community]. Merged oss-hg to oss-git. Thanks, -- Jonathan Steel pgpvDMCdfr07m.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: [aur-general] uppity replaces curlpaste in [community]
On Wed 18 Sep 2013 at 20:00, Rashif Ray Rahman wrote: On 18 September 2013 06:18, Xyne x...@archlinux.ca wrote: Jonathan Steel wrote: $_gitname is $srcdir/$_gitname, not $startdir/$_gitname, so it's fine. To double-check I set $SRCDEST to point somewhere else and it builds fine still. You're right. Looking at the source of makepkg, I see now that all functions cd into $srcdir. I still prefer the $srcdir/$_gitname format as it is explicit and future-proof, but there is currently no technical reason to do so. I was told by at least one pacman dev (can't quite recall who or via which communication channel) that this practice should not be obsoleted; we should continue to navigate into $srcdir before doing anything. Thanks both, I agree specifically using $srcdir would be clearer/better practice. I'll update my git packages accordingly next time I touch them. -- Jonathan Steel pgp3K2S6NCAkT.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: [aur-general] WTFPL question
On Tue, 17 Sep 2013 19:35:52 +0200 pon...@creshal.de wrote: On 09/17/2013 06:51 PM, Frederik Freso S. Olesen wrote: Den 17-09-2013 11:18, Storm Dragon skrev: I thought I had this stuff all figured out lol. Looks like you've already been helped out quite a bit, so I'll just chime in to add this: Use https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/VCS_PKGBUILD_Guidelines instead of PKGBUILD-git.proto. The -git.proto file is outdated (I could have sworn there was a ticket about this on the bug tracker, but I can't find it now) and shouldn't be followed at the moment. Also, look over the rest of the PKGBUILD guidelines and documentation on the Wiki. (About the WTFPL - assuming they (you?) are using the license correctly, it will include a '© Author' as the 3rd or 4th or so line, which is why the WTFPL isn't among the generically added licenses: https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/33664 ) @WTFPL As far as I understand it, the copyright statement on the fourth line of the license is regarding the license text itself and means Sam Hocevar holds the copyright on the license text and not the software you ship the license with. Therefor when you use the WTFPL you usually slap a second copyright statement above the actual license text and which regards your software as described here [0] in How do I use the WTFPL and Can you explain the WTFPL terms to me?. But I could be wrong, licenses are weird. [0] http://www.wtfpl.net/faq/ FWIW, I agree with ponder - the author's Copyright doesn't go into the license file any more than it does with the GPL. Just where you, as the software author, specify the license, you point it to the WTFPL COPYING file. The person who closed the bug seems to be confused. -- Jonathan ArnoldWebstream: http://hieronymus.soup.io Talent wins games, but team work and intelligence wins championships. Michael Jordan
[aur-general] bash script lint
Just a FYI - this site: http://www.shellcheck.net/ runs a checker on bash scripts. It actually works pretty well on PKGBUILD scripts, although it does warn about unused variables. -- Jonathan ArnoldWebstream: http://hieronymus.soup.io Talent wins games, but team work and intelligence wins championships. Michael Jordan
[aur-general] uppity replaces curlpaste in [community]
Hi, curlpaste [1] has been replaced [2] by uppity [3]. The usage is very much the same. I propose moving uppity-git to [community] as uppity, and removing curlpaste (not uploading it to the AUR). Am I right in thinking that uppity replaces, but does not conflict with curlpaste as there are no file conflicts? I believe I need three other TUs to agree that uppity can go into [community] as it only has two votes. If this does not happen in the next two weeks, I will continue to remove curlpaste from [community], but leave uppity-git in the AUR. Thanks, [1] https://www.archlinux.org/packages/community/any/curlpaste/ [2] https://github.com/Kiwi/curlpaste/tree/master Please use Uppity from this point on, it is far better than curlpaste ever was. [3] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/uppity-git/ -- Jonathan Steel pgpiAe3PWwt4a.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: [aur-general] uppity replaces curlpaste in [community]
On Tue 17 Sep 2013 at 21:36, Xyne wrote: If you rename the package (uppity-git - uppity), do you plan to modify it so that it builds from fixed tags? If not then it should not be renamed as it remains a git package. Renaming it would be against our guidelines. I will do so. I also noticed that you are using cd $_gitname in the PKGBUILD. Please see my reply to someone else about why this is incorrect[1] and update it to do everything in $srcdir/$_gitname. $_gitname is $srcdir/$_gitname, not $startdir/$_gitname, so it's fine. To double-check I set $SRCDEST to point somewhere else and it builds fine still. [...] [1] https://mailman.archlinux.org/pipermail/aur-general/2013-September/025124.html -- Jonathan Steel pgp7QSAdb2hup.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: [aur-general] Renaming Request For aws-cli
On Wed, 4 Sep 2013 11:46:53 +0300 Alper Kanat tu...@raptiye.org wrote: Hey There, Could you please rename my package aws-cli to aws-cli-git ? https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/aws-cli/ Thanks! Packages can't be renamed. Just upload a new one with the correct name and a TU can delete or merge this one with it. -- Jonathan ArnoldWebstream: http://hieronymus.soup.io Talent wins games, but team work and intelligence wins championships. Michael Jordan
[aur-general] Doom3 BFG packages
There are 2 Doom3 BFG packages, based on the same github: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/rbdoom3-bfg-git/ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/rbdoom3bfg-git/ As far as I can tell, they build the same thing. The second one should probably be deleted, as the first one has been around since January and the second one only since August. -- Jonathan ArnoldWebstream: http://hieronymus.soup.io Talent wins games, but team work and intelligence wins championships. Michael Jordan
Re: [aur-general] request merge vapoursynth-git into vapoursynth
On Sun 25 Aug 2013 at 20:36, SpinFlo wrote: hi please merge https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/vapoursynth-githttps://aur.archlinux.org/packages/vapoursynth/ into https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/vapoursynth/ vapursynth package use SVN (tag branch), this method not longer available. i change to GIT because this project don't use zip sources greetings If it's a git package it should end with -git. Your -git version has been updated more recently and the URL you provided above links to the wrong package. Please confirm which one to delete. I suggest keeping the -git name. -- Jonathan Steel pgpbAQflKUVZO.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: [aur-general] Tuxtype or tuxtyping
On Mon 19 Aug 2013 at 22:36, Storm Dragon wrote: Hi, Awesome, thanks, works great. Why is this pkg not the one in the AUR? Just curious. Thanks It's up to the maintainer to update the package. You could send them an email to chase them up. If they don't respond after two weeks you can send an email in here to ask for it to be disowned. -- Jonathan Steel pgpquALgFqomz.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: [aur-general] Tuxtype or tuxtyping
On Tue 13 Aug 2013 at 03:26, Storm Dragon wrote: Hi, These packages are in the AUR, unfortunately they are both failing to build because, I assume, they aren't being maintained. I was wondering if someone would be willing to go fix them? I was hoping to use one or the other to teach my kids how to type. They have about a 2 second attention span if there's not flashing lights and colors/points/coin sounds involved lol. Thanks ant32 shared an updated PKGBUILD in the comments that works. https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/tuxtype I've deleted tuxtyping as it was just a duplicate of tuxtype. -- Jonathan Steel pgpepKqA5RkPV.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: [aur-general] spark vs. spark
On Wed 14 Aug 2013 at 19:32, Jerome Leclanche wrote: [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/spark/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/spark-git/ Conflict is avoided here because [1] has a -svn package, but it's still very confusing and should probably be renamed. Any suggestions? Ask the maintainer to change it, either in the comments or send them an email. -- Jonathan Steel pgpIfE4ifSiwa.pgp Description: PGP signature
[aur-general] golangide duplicate
There seems to be some duplication of effort between this package in AUR: liteide - https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/liteide/ and this package in community : https://www.archlinux.org/packages/community/i686/golangide/ Ie, I think they are providing the same thing. -- Jonathan ArnoldWebstream: http://hieronymus.soup.io Talent wins games, but team work and intelligence wins championships. Michael Jordan
Re: [aur-general] Merge requests for [exploitdb-svn] and [exploitdb]
On Wed 31 Jul 2013 at 12:58, Evan Teitelman wrote: Please merge exploitdb[1] and exploitdb-svn[2] into exploit-db[3]. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/exploitdb/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/exploitdb-svn/ [3] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/exploit-db/ Done. -- Jonathan Steel pgpRMAQSWtlgW.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: [aur-general] Removal/merge/disown requests
On Wed 31 Jul 2013 at 17:25, Michael Schubert wrote: Dear TUs, Please remove the following package: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/tomboy-image/ Reason: orphan, upstream URL 404s Deleted. Please merge: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/python2-rpy2-svn/ = https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/python2-rpy2-hg/ Reason: orphan, moved from svn to bitbucket Merged. Also, please disown the following: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/python2-pymc/ [*] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/python2-pymc-git/ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/python-pymc/ Reason: none of them builds, I supplied a patch in the comments in May [*] and package was not updated since. Send them an email and give them two weeks to respond. They were active less than 4 months ago. -- Jonathan Steel pgpWKugSmYPei.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: [aur-general] Multiple Renames/Merges/Deletion requests.
On Wed 31 Jul 2013 at 14:50, John D Jones III wrote: Dearest Recipients: I would respectfully like to make the following requests with regard to AUR packages that I maintain, or have maintained: Merge: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/perl-vypress/ Into: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/perl-net-vypress-chat/ They are the same package. Merged. Merge: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/perl-catalyst-runtime-5.80/ Into: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/perl-catalyst-runtime/ or Delete the offending perl-catalyst-runtime-5.80 as it's Out of Date Deleted. Rename https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/perl-ansicolor/ to be: perl-term-ansicolor The proper name of the module is Term::ANSIColor. I've tried to send up a Term::ANSIColor package, but AUR responded that it was blacklisted. Since the ANSIColor package is really Term::ANSIColor, doesn't seem useful to have the correct name blacklisted perl provides perl-term-ansicolor so I'll delete this one. Delete https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/perl-class-dbi-frozen-301/ as the package is served better by https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/perl-class-dbi-frozen/ which is the same pkg Deleted, thanks. -- Jonathan Steel pgp0yZ1KlD2tH.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: [aur-general] Disownment requests for package xephem
On Tue 23 Jul 2013 at 14:55, Matteo Paoluzzi wrote: Goodmorning, since AUR package Xephem (https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/xephem/) has not been updated for three years despite of some comments in the package page, I would like to become the mainteiner. I've already written and tested the PKGBUILD, just waiting your approval. Thank you. Done. I hope your new PKGBUILD doesn't use $startdir and also includes a license.txt in the source rather than echoing it into a file from the PKGBUILD. Thanks, -- Jonathan Steel pgpescQLqqTvQ.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: [aur-general] Deletion request: python-relatorio
On Tue 23 Jul 2013 at 19:32, Robin Baumgartner wrote: Hi As the current maintainer, I'd like to ask for deletion of the package python-relatorio[1] from the AUR. It has been replaced by python2-relatorio. Thanks, Robin [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/python-relatorio/ Merged into https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/python2-relatorio/. -- Jonathan Steel pgpAhraYfRmSD.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: [aur-general] About orphaning all packages of inactive users
On Sat 20 Jul 2013 at 07:49, Frederik Freso S. Olesen wrote: Den 19-07-2013 22:45, Jonathan Steel skrev: [...] If in doubt, an email to them won't hurt, but in my experience this has always lead to disowning them. FWIW, I've sent e-mails to maintainers that replied back and got around to updating their packages. You likely don't hear about these, as the requests (seldomly, anyway) come to this mailing list. It's true that I have more often not gotten a reply, but it does happen that I have. We are talking about users who have been inactive for a more than a year, especially ones that have ignored flags/comments for a long time; have users really come back after a year or so just because you emailed them? -- Jonathan Steel pgpKPbnwovsVa.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: [aur-general] Orphan request: chm2pdf
On Sat 20 Jul 2013 at 09:22, Mariusz Libera wrote: Hi, please orphan chm2pdf, PKGBUILD is broken, maintainer didn't respond to comment nor mail I sent on 5 of July. https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/chm2pdf/ Mariusz Libera All yours. -- Jonathan Steel pgp6rAOM0Xd16.pgp Description: PGP signature
[aur-general] Remove or split?
I have an AUR package (p4v) which installs several binaries for the package. However, Perforce removed a binary and put it in its own installer. I will create an installer for it but what should I do for the p4v installer? Perforce says they remove the binary in their Windows installer. I should probably do the same but I should at least tell them what happened, right? And do I just do an 'rm'? Should I create a so-called split package and install both? I'm loathe to do this, as I for one don't actually use p4sandbox. -- Jonathan ArnoldWebstream: http://hieronymus.soup.io Talent wins games, but team work and intelligence wins championships. Michael Jordan
Re: [aur-general] About orphaning all packages of inactive users
On Fri 19 Jul 2013 at 01:09, Maxime GAUDUIN wrote: On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 12:24 AM, Alexander Rødseth rods...@gmail.comwrote: [...] About causing panic when orphaning: the package will continue to be available and work even if it's orphaned, but now there is a chance that someone will pick up the thread where the previous maintainer left of and improve and update the PKGBUILD. If someone panics from this, perhaps it's still a good trade? The reason I'm asking is because I suspect that I'm more fond of cleaning up old cruft than the average TU/Dev, and I don't wish to orphan or delete packages in a way that is perceived as rash. In my opinion, being relatively quick to orphan, but hesitant to delete, should result in a better AUR repository for everyone, as long as the criterions for disowning packages is somewhat conservative. I would say a user being inactive for more than a year is quite sufficient. A comment from another TU or Dev would be especially helpful. I support this too. Orphaning is reversible and will most (preferably always :P) of the time lead to an improvement of the PKGBUILD, I see no reason not to do it when the user is clearly inactive. As for deletions, I would also tend to delete old stuff more easily, but I understand and respect the wish to keep placeholders in the AUR. I think we should orphan all packages of a maintainer that is clearly not active, especially if they have packages marked out of date for a long time or requests in the comments that have not been addressed. If in doubt, an email to them won't hurt, but in my experience this has always lead to disowning them. This will then allow other users to make improvements immediately rather than having to wait two weeks for the current maintainer to (not) reply, and then make a request here and wait to have that actioned. -- Jonathan Steel pgpTM2QsWWcoh.pgp Description: PGP signature
[aur-general] Removal notifier?
Speaking of removing packages, is there a tool that would tell me if a package I have installed has been removed? As someone who installs far too many packages, I will end up with a package installed because something depends on it, but then that something goes away and I never find out. -- Jonathan ArnoldWebstream: http://hieronymus.soup.io Talent wins games, but team work and intelligence wins championships. Michael Jordan
Re: [aur-general] Merge request for Greybird
On Mon 15 Jul 2013 at 11:07, Edoardo Maria Elidoro wrote: Hi everyone, this [1] is a duplicate of this [2] so I'm asking for a merge. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/greybird-themes/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/xfce-theme-greybird/ [1] was only submitted last month while [2] is two years old. Deleting [1]. -- Jonathan Steel pgpE6pkg25osJ.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: [aur-general] Merge request for Elementary Icons
On Mon 15 Jul 2013 at 11:10, Edoardo Maria Elidoro wrote: Hi everyone, this[1] is a duplicate of this[2] so I'm requesting a merge. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/elementary-icon-theme/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/elementary-icons/ Thanks, the user had submitted a few duplicates recently. Deleted [1]. -- Jonathan Steel pgpooMrdYp_he.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: [aur-general] Merge of ipsec-openswan
On Mon 15 Jul 2013 at 11:43, Francesco Colista wrote: Hi all. I'm maintaining ipsec-openswan's aur package. I'm asking to merge this package with openswan since this two packages are redoundant and referring to the same software. Thanks for your kind assistance. Merged, thanks. Please provide links to packages next time, for convenience. -- Jonathan Steel pgpXTULjoN_BY.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: [aur-general] Delete request: btsync
On Mon 15 Jul 2013 at 12:46, Aliaksandr Stelmachonak wrote: Hi, currently 2 packages for same software are exists in AUR and I am as maintainer of the btsync agreed with bittorrent-sync maintainer to delete btsync in favour of bittorrent-sync package. Deleted btsync. Please provide a link to the package next time for convenience. -- Jonathan Steel pgp1nwF6HY83F.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: [aur-general] Delete request
On Sun 14 Jul 2013 at 14:04, Limao Luo wrote: Can you please remove https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/wget-bzr ? Upstream switched to git a while back. Deleted thanks. -- Jonathan Steel pgpwj9kb7fRZr.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: [aur-general] Deletetion request: various ttf packages
On Thu 11 Jul 2013 at 14:50, John D Jones III wrote: On 07/11/2013 06:14 AM, Edoardo Maria Elidoro wrote: Source gone: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/ttf-swfit/ Source gone: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/ttf-menma/ Source gone: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/ttf-handelgotdlig/ Deleted. Various sources gone: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/ttf-ironmaiden-fonts/ Maybe someone can update the sources for the maiden fonts: http://maiden-world.com/articles/iron-maiden-fonts-typography.html Update it then, or leave a comment for the next maintainer. -- Jonathan Steel pgpJUK_UNka5r.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: [aur-general] Merge request
On Sat 13 Jul 2013 at 18:00, Stefano wrote: Hi everyone, I made a name mistake and I propose to merge [1] in [2]: [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/libreoffice-kalahari/ IN [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/libreoffice-kalahari-mod/ Merged. -- Jonathan Steel pgps6FeI4Ynnr.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: [aur-general] Cannot reset password guillaume.algis at gmail
On Fri 12 Jul 2013 at 19:48, Guillaume Algis wrote: Hi, *This is my first time posting on the arch mailing list, so let me know if I'm doing anything wrong.* I'm trying to reset my password on https://aur.archlinux.org/passreset/, but I never receive any mail with the steps to reset the password. I double checked the mail address (guillaume.al...@gmail.com), and checked the spam folder, but I don't receive anything. Thank you for your time. I don't see a user with that email address. What is your username? -- Jonathan Steel pgp_Q8hpG2_3Z.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: [aur-general] Merge request
On Mon 01 Jul 2013 at 11:14, Edoardo Maria Elidoro wrote: Hi everyone, I fixed the name, the category and adopted this package: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/gtk2-theme-mira/ It should be merged into the new and correct one here: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/gtk-theme-mira/ Have a nice day, Edoardo Merged, thanks. -- Jonathan Steel pgpunT1QsmKuy.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: [aur-general] (no subject)
On Mon 01 Jul 2013 at 11:57, Edoardo Maria Elidoro wrote: Hi everyone, Opera-Beta exists no more so I think this package needs to be removed: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/opera-beta/ The URL of the source does some magic the AUR doesn't like, but the source is still available. Also, I don't get the reason to keep these two packages: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/opera-11.62-x86_64/ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/opera-11.62/ Deleted. since we have this: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/opera-116/ Thanks, Edoardo -- Jonathan Steel pgpwoUpBRRFYp.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: [aur-general] Fw: Merge request
On Sat 29 Jun 2013 at 18:40, Stefan Husmann wrote: Hello, please merge gdl-svn (repo does not exist) into gdl-git. https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/gdl-svn/ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/gdl-git/ Best Regards Stefan Merged, thanks. -- Jonathan Steel pgpwVFC8t5LSN.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: [aur-general] Rename Request
On Wed, 26 Jun 2013 16:31:23 +0200 Edoardo Maria Elidoro edoardo.elid...@gmail.com wrote: Hi everyone, I just adopted this package, but it has a wrong name: please change xfce4-theme-axis in xfwm-theme-axis. https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/xfce4-theme-axis/ Have a nice day, Edoardo You can't rename a package. Create a new one with the correct name, upload it and then post here asking for a merge, with links to both packages. -- Jonathan ArnoldWebstream: http://hieronymus.soup.io Talent wins games, but team work and intelligence wins championships. Michael Jordan
Re: [aur-general] Various request
On Mon 24 Jun 2013 at 10:46, Edoardo Maria Elidoro wrote: Hi everyone, here's a little list of old, broken and wrong packages (mainly Gnome-Shell themes with no 3.8 compatibility) made with a couple of friends on Google+. I think there's no reason to keep them in AUR since we don't provide GShell 3.4 or 3.6 anymore. I will delete any without sources or that are broken *and* that are orphans... 1.- Made for an older Shell version https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/gnome-shell-theme-elementary/ 2.- Made for an older Shell version https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/gnome-shell-theme-elementary-luna/ 3.- Made for an older Shell version https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/gnome-shell-theme-elementary-viper-luna/ 4.- Made for an older Shell version https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/gnome-shell-theme-holo/ 5.- Made for an older Shell version https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/gnome-shell-theme-littlebigmod_2nd/ 6.- Made for an older Shell version https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/gtk-theme-grayrevenge/ 7.- Made for an older Shell version https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/gnome-shell-theme-google/ Ignored 8.- Souce gone Made for an older Shell version https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/gnome-shell-theme-malys/ Deleted 9.- Source gone Made for an older Shell version https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/gnome-shell-theme-malys-blueglass/ Ignored 10.- Source gone Made for an older Shell version https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/gnome-shell-theme-malys-single-user/ Deleted 11.- Made for an older Shell version https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/gnome-shell-theme-metalx/ 12.- Made for an older Shell version https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/gnome-shell-theme-orta/ 13.- Made for an older Shell version https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/gnome-shell-theme-pantheon/ 14.- Made for an older Shell version https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/gnome-shell-theme-prismas/ 15.- Made for an older Shell version https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/gnome-shell-theme-seeha/ 16.- Made for an older Shell version https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/gnome-shell-theme-shine/ 17.- Made for an older Shell version https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/gnome-shell-theme-smooth-inset/ 18.- Made for an older Shell version https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/gnome-shell-theme-star-trek/ 19.- Made for an older Shell version https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/gnome-shell-theme-viper/ 20.- Really, really OLD and now useless package. https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/elementary-mod-gtk-theme/ 21.- eGTK, I'll made a separate thread for this. 22.- Made for an older Shell version https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/gnome-shell-theme-ultra/ 23.- Made for an older Shell version https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/greyness-gnome-shell-theme/ Ignored 24.- Orphan, OLD and won't compile. https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/gtk-theme-switch-ex/ 25.- Source gone https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/gtk-theme-ringi/ Deleted 26.- Made for an older Shell version https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/gnomish-beige-theme/ 27.- Made for an older Shell version https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/gnomish-dark-theme/ 28.- Made for an older Shell version https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/mint-z-theme-git/ 29.- only gtk2, move in xfce category https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/gtk-theme-clearlooks-mod-sharp/ 30.- only gtk2, move in xfce category https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/gtk-theme-darkway/ 31.- Made for an older Shell version https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/sammy-themes/ 32.- Made for an older Shell version https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/zukini-theme/ 33.- Made for an older Shell version https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/gnome-shell-theme-adwaita-slim/ 34.- Made for an older Shell version https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/gnome-shell-theme-adwaita-white/ 35.- Made for an older Shell version https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/gnome-shell-theme-alternative/ Ignored Thanks, have a nice day. Edoardo Thanks, -- Jonathan Steel pgplVG6jCUptc.pgp Description: PGP signature
[aur-general] package delete
The mitter blogging platfrom no longer exists: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/mitter-alpha/ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/mitter-git/ Please delete these packages. -- Jonathan ArnoldWebstream: http://hieronymus.soup.io Talent wins games, but team work and intelligence wins championships. Michael Jordan
Re: [aur-general] Numerous package orphaning
On Sat, Apr 20, 2013 at 07:54:08PM +0100, Jonathan Steel wrote: On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 09:16:43PM -0700, Kevin Vesga wrote: I would ask that the following packages all be orphaned since they are out-of-date or broken and the maintainer's email is not valid: [...] All orphaned. https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/xtables-addons/ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/xtables-addons-git/ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/l7-protocols/ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/pxlib/ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/pxview/ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/ratemask/ Email hasn't bounced for me yet and the user was active recently. I will wait for a bounce or 2 week response before orphaning these. No reply, all orphaned. -- Jonathan Steel pgpXKPIuF2Qda.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: [aur-general] Request to orphan foobar2000
On Wed, May 01, 2013 at 08:54:16PM -0700, Taylor Lookabaugh wrote: On Wed, May 1, 2013 at 5:55 PM, Joe Davison j...@warhaggis.com wrote: Probably should have included a link. Here it is for convenience. https://aur.archlinux.org/**packages/foobar2000/https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/foobar2000/ On 2013-05-02 01:53, Joe Davison wrote: I emailed the maintainer of the foobar2000 package on the 3rd of April. I'm yet to receive a response. Comments on the package itself pretty much all constitute begging him to disown or update the package. He's nowhere to be seen. I'd like to take over maintenance of the package. Hasn't been active since 2012-04-08 either it seems. Disowned. -- Jonathan Steel pgp2fafwOTLD3.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: [aur-general] Merge and removal requests
On Wed, May 01, 2013 at 01:08:41AM +0200, Lex Black wrote: Hi I skipped through orphaned, ood -git PKGBuilds and found some that can be merged or deleted: [...] qutim-0.2: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/qutim-0.2-git/ Obsolete. Not maintained and newer qutim PKGBuild available. qutim-0.2-plugins-git: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/qutim-0.2-plugins-git/ Like the main package. qutim-0.2-protocol-icq-git: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/qutim-0.2-protocol-icq-git/ Like the main package. qutim-0.2-protocol-jabber-git: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/qutim-0.2-protocol-jabber-git/ Also like the main package. All deleted. python-supernova-git: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/python-supernova-git/ Replaced by python2-supernova-git ( https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/python2-supernova-git/ ) Merged. python-oauth2-git: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/python-oauth2-git/ Replaced by python2-oauth2-git ( https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/python2-oauth2-git/ ) Merged. python-soaplib-git: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/python-soaplib-git/ Upstream renamed this project Deleted. opus-exp-git: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/opus-exp-git/ See comment Note that this branch has been merged with the master branch. Use opus-git! Deleted. hime: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/hime/ Git VCS --- hime-git ( https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/hime-git/ ) Merged. gir-repository-git: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/gir-repository-git/ See comment from the gnome irc servers: (06:49:46 PM) walters: bmonkey: shouldn't need gir-repository for gnome-shell (06:50:00 PM) walters: bmonkey: in fact, please stop using gir-repository =) Also the build has a lot of problems. Deleted. etherpad-git: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/etherpad-git/ Superceded by etherpad-lite(-git) ( https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/etherpad-lite-git/ ) Deleted. devmon-git: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/devmon-git/ Source dead and superceded by udevil Deleted. dao-git: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/dao-git/ See comment Hello, the project seems to be dead. Could you please remove this package? Deleted. Thanks, -- Jonathan Steel pgpFPXaZdySaQ.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: [aur-general] Merge elilo-efi-x86_64 into elilo-efi
On Fri, May 03, 2013 at 05:30:26PM +0530, Keshav Padram wrote: Hi, Please merge elilo-efi-x86_64 [1] pkg into elilo-efi [2] pkg. Thanks in advance. [1]: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/elilo-efi-x86_64/ [2]: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/elilo-efi/ Merged. -- Jonathan Steel pgpdjkaIQ3Yjo.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: [aur-general] ttf-google-webfonts{,-distilled,-git,-hg} mess
On Thu, 25 Apr 2013 16:04:12 +0100 WorMzy Tykashi wormzy.tyka...@gmail.com wrote: So, then the solution is for the -git maintainer to update / re-upload the PKGBUILD whenever there's a version bump to the git repo? -- David J. Haines djhai...@gmx.com No, the solution is for the users of the -git package to track upstream changes and re-compile the package as and when they see fit. As it is for all -git (and -svn and -hg, etc) packages. As it should be, IMHO. -- Jonathan ArnoldWebstream: http://hieronymus.soup.io Talent wins games, but team work and intelligence wins championships. Michael Jordan
Re: [aur-general] Disown request
On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 03:32:06PM -0430, Francisco Martinez wrote: Howdy, The lcs-svn package (https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/lcs-svn/) has been outdated for quite a long time (Since 07/12/12; I flagged it as out-of-date in the AUR yesterday). I sent an email to the maintainer, but I haven't received an answer yet. I'm unsure if I should've waited longer before doing this request, but I am doing it anyway due to the time it has been outdated. Regards, Francisco Martinez The user last updated a package less than a month ago, so please wait two weeks for a response; he seems active. -- Jonathan Steel pgpNfidJCvKql.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: [aur-general] Remove request (Deprecated MATE packages)
On Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 01:55:24PM +0200, Stefan Husmann wrote: Am 15.04.2013 05:57, schrieb Ted Alff: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/libmate/ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/libmateui/ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/libmatecanvas/ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/libmatecomponent/ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/libmatecomponentui/ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/libmatenotify/ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/mate-conf/ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/mate-conf-editor/ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/mate-corba/ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/mate-mime-data/ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/mate-vfs/ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/python-corba/ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/python-mate/ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/python-mate-desktop/ All deprecate by the MATE 1.6 release (http://mate-desktop.org/2013/04/02/mate-1-6-released/) I am not a TU but would like to draw everyone's attention to the fact, that perberos is both AUR maintainer and upstream maintainer, at least his mentionend in the welcome message on the homepage you posted. Does he know about this request? CC'ing him. Best Regards Stefan I emailed him directly and he confirms they should be deleted. Done. -- Jonathan Steel pgpBp8kzyE6Th.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: [aur-general] Numerous package orphaning
On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 09:16:43PM -0700, Kevin Vesga wrote: I would ask that the following packages all be orphaned since they are out-of-date or broken and the maintainer's email is not valid: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/automake-1.11/ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/autoscan/ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/bin32-teamspeak2/ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/crrcsim/ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/django-registration/ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/eclipse-i18n-es/ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/epson-inkjet-printer-escpr/ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/gkrellaclock/ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/gkrellm-volume/ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/gkrellmms/ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/gkrellweather/ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/gnome-shell-theme-adwaita-white/ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/pam-keyring-tool/ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/portaudio_v18/ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/qamix/ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/spidermonkey-1.7/ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/valide/ All orphaned. https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/xtables-addons/ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/xtables-addons-git/ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/l7-protocols/ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/pxlib/ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/pxview/ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/ratemask/ Email hasn't bounced for me yet and the user was active recently. I will wait for a bounce or 2 week response before orphaning these. Thanks, -- Jonathan Steel pgp28NvR2_abk.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: [aur-general] Removal Request: repo_manager
On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 03:32:37PM +1000, Phillip Smith wrote: I'd like to suggest repo_manager [1] be removed. = Not updated since it was first uploaded. = Upstream seems to have completely abandoned the project (404's and no mention anywhere on rest of site). = Upstream source is gone and no alternative sources. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/repo_manager/ Deleted, thanks. -- Jonathan Steel pgpjuLdPn0oVh.pgp Description: PGP signature
[aur-general] Depends question
I'm working on a pkgbuild for a package that can use either tomcat6 or tomcat7. Is it possible to make the depends list use an or? -- Jonathan ArnoldWebstream: http://hieronymus.soup.io Talent wins games, but team work and intelligence wins championships. Michael Jordan
[aur-general] copy delete request
Perhaps due to the copy vs copy-agent request, copy[1] was orphaned. I think it can be safely deleted, as copy-agent[2] is a better PKGBUILD, albeit not without its own flaws. [1] - https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/copy/ [2] - https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/copy-agent/ -- Jonathan ArnoldWebstream: http://hieronymus.soup.io Talent wins games, but team work and intelligence wins championships. Michael Jordan
Re: [aur-general] Depends question
On Mon, 08 Apr 2013 11:14:20 -0300 Rafael Ferreira joseph...@archlinux.info wrote: Em 08/04/2013 11:10, Jesse Jaara escreveu: maanantai, 8. huhtikuuta 2013 10:06:42 Jonathan Arnold kirjoitti: I'm working on a pkgbuild for a package that can use either tomcat6 or tomcat7. Is it possible to make the depends list use an or? Providing neather is needed at build time, you could just put both in the optdepends. If they are needed to build the package create 2 PKGBUILDs, one for each version. Good idea. Just complementing: with both PKGBUILDs having same provides=(). If two packages (tomcat is needed to run it), how would you name them? opengrok-tomcat6/-tomcat7 or opengrok-t6/t7? -- Jonathan ArnoldWebstream: http://hieronymus.soup.io Talent wins games, but team work and intelligence wins championships. Michael Jordan
Re: [aur-general] AUR package: yogurt
On Mon, Apr 08, 2013 at 04:46:34PM -0400, Jason St. John wrote: I hate to be the guy ruining someone's joke, but is the yogurt package[1] really appropriate for the AUR? It just makes a symlink from yogurt to yaourt making fun of the latter's name. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/yogurt/ I've suggested he uses an alias if he prefers to use the English word. I'll give him time to respond before deleting it. Thanks, -- Jonathan Steel pgpHVxelGJLrd.pgp Description: PGP signature
[aur-general] Copy.com dueling packages
There are 2 packages for the Copy.com client software package: copy - https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/copy/ copy-agent - https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/copy-agent/ I think both have PKGBUILD problems, from dependencies (the Copy.com software uses Qt4, not Gtk, for instance) to poorly formed PKGBUILDs (one has just a package() method and one has just a build() method). I'm not really sure how this should be resolved, mostly because I wouldn't pick one over the other right now. Any one with more PKGBUILD confidence want to step in? Also, if you're interested, sign up with this link and we both get an extra 5gb(!) of cloud storage on copy.com: https://copy.com?r=NXWnIn -- Jonathan ArnoldWebstream: http://hieronymus.soup.io Talent wins games, but team work and intelligence wins championships. Michael Jordan
Re: [aur-general] Copy.com dueling packages
On Tue, 02 Apr 2013 20:35:27 +0200 Jelle van der Waa je...@vdwaa.nl wrote: On 02/04/13 17:59, Jonathan Arnold wrote: There are 2 packages for the Copy.com client software package: copy - https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/copy/ copy-agent - https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/copy-agent/ I think both have PKGBUILD problems, from dependencies (the Copy.com software uses Qt4, not Gtk, for instance) to poorly formed PKGBUILDs (one has just a package() method and one has just a build() method). I'm not really sure how this should be resolved, mostly because I wouldn't pick one over the other right now. Any one with more PKGBUILD confidence want to step in? Also, if you're interested, sign up with this link and we both get an extra 5gb(!) of cloud storage on copy.com: https://copy.com?r=NXWnIn Imo the 'copy' package is perfectly fine. The other package installs in /opt which isn't needed. Actually, I think you mean the copy-agent one. That has the correct dependency, as well as correctly uses the package() function, and not the build() function that the copy one does. And doesn't ln -s to programs in the /opt folder. -- Jonathan ArnoldWebstream: http://hieronymus.soup.io Talent wins games, but team work and intelligence wins championships. Michael Jordan
Re: [aur-general] package rename request (java-service-wrapper)
On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 02:08:06PM -0400, skydrome wrote: On 03/22/2013 11:26 AM, skydrome wrote: Im wondering if https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/java-service-wrapper should be renamed to java-service-wrapper -bin as it installs the precompiled wrapper binary And if https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/java-service-wrapper-src be renamed to java-service-wrapper as this compiles from source. TU's can't rename packages; you have to re-upload the PKGBUILDs under the new name and then post a merge request to merge these into the new packages. Would it be possible for you to disown this package. An email was sent to the maintainer a week ago from this post and no response. They also have other out of date packages since december of last year. Thanks. Its all worked out now. Can a TU please delete https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/java-service-wrapper-src now? Thanks Deleted, thanks. -- Jonathan Steel pgp2gCYShlzB1.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: [aur-general] Disown request: offlineimap-git
On Sun, 17 Mar 2013 16:48:44 +0100 Ike Devolder ike.devol...@gmail.com wrote: Op zondag 17 maart 2013 15:30:28 schreef Jakub Klinkovský: Please disown offlineimap-git[1]. The package is out-of-date for more than a year and doesn't build. [1]: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/offlineimap-git/ Thanks, Jakub Klinkovský take it, its yours I hate to be anal (it just isn't my style), but shouldn't the 2 week notice rule still be followed here? -- Jonathan ArnoldWebstream: http://hieronymus.soup.io Talent wins games, but team work and intelligence wins championships. Michael Jordan
Re: [aur-general] [Removal request] kdeplasma-applets-plaspool
On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 01:55:16PM +0100, A Rojas wrote: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/kdeplasma-applets-plaspool/ Doesn't compile, abandoned upstream, superseded by kdeutils-print-manager Deleted, thanks. -- Jonathan Steel pgpbdwn5fwV8n.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: [aur-general] TU apply counselor
On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 03:37:48PM +0100, Jorge Barroso wrote: El Lunes, 25 de febrero de 2013 20:46:46 Vitor Eiji Justus Sakaguti escribió: On Feb 25, 2013 4:26 PM, Connor Behan connor.be...@gmail.com wrote: On 25/02/13 08:09 AM, Rudy Matela wrote: https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Trusted_Users#How_to_become_TU.3F On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 1:01 PM, Jorge Barroso jorge_barroso...@hotmail.com wrote: Hi, I'm Jorge Barroso (jorge_barroso in the AUR), I've been an Arch user for some time and I've learned a lot of things since I do it. Now, I'd like to apply as a trusted user, so I'd like that anybody helped me telling me what should I do yet to became a Trusted User Regards And the one additional requirement for becoming a TU not mentioned there is no top posting! :-P Also, you need a really good excuse to get away with using hotmail! Jaja, sorry, I have recently started to use kmail as email desktop client, and I got two email accounts. The hotmail one it's because of I have some old accounts with my hotmail account registered, and it also helps me to avoid span on my gmail account, which is the official one which I registered here :P I've read the wiki page from Rudy Matela, and I think I have all the basic things I should have... Know basic shel scripting... 18 packages on the aur Basic community involvement I really know google-fu (if it is what I think it is...) and I got a general idea on the kind of packages I would like to mantain If someone could tell me their opinion, it would be great, because I'd like to improve what I need to improve Make sure you follow the packaging standards and read similar wiki pages (anything about packaging, standards, TU/developer pages). It would help to look at PKGBUILDs from the official repos to get an idea of the style that is used and standardise yours. It would help to get involved upstream, improve the wiki, help on the forum etc. Get familiar with svn and use devtools to build your packages. -- Jonathan Steel pgp_Fpa1FZSGM.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: [aur-general] Remove request
On Sun, Feb 10, 2013 at 05:32:37PM -0300, Agustin Ferrario wrote: Please remove traceroute-for-linux [1] the package is outdated and it is also in core [2] [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/traceroute-for-linux/ [2] https://www.archlinux.org/packages/core/x86_64/traceroute/ Cheers py_crash Deleted, thanks. -- Jonathan Steel pgpbyw390wIQI.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: [aur-general] python-flask-babel = python2-flask-babel
On Tue, Feb 05, 2013 at 04:14:03AM -0500, Limao Luo wrote: On 02/04/2013 05:45 PM, Ward De Ridder wrote: Hello all, I just took over as maintainer for python-flask-babel [1], and updated the PKGBUILD, but now I see someone else also created the same library with another name: python2-flask-babel [2]. This is the same library, so I think one of them should be merged into the other one. Ward De Ridder [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/python-flask-babel/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/python2-flask-babel/ Yeah, [1] should be merged into [2], since they're both Python 2-based. Merged. -- Jonathan Steel pgpeRg0jBvEB1.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: [aur-general] Remove package: cnijfilter-mg5300series
On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 12:32:00PM +, Benjamin Chrétien wrote: Hi, Could you please remove the package cnijfilter-mg5300series ( https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/cnijfilter-mg5300series/)? I managed to miss an existing one... (here: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/cnijfilter-mg5300). I will be more careful next time :-) Done, thanks. -- Jonathan Steel pgpDRLTJRCAej.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: [aur-general] Disown requests
On Sun, Jan 20, 2013 at 09:50:09AM +0800, Daniel YC Lin wrote: I've post an updated PKGBUILD on fossil fossil-fossil. If you insist it should be rename to fossil-git, let me know, I'll upload a new PKGBUILD. Yes, please upload it with the right name; git packages should end with -git. https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Arch_CVS_%26_SVN_PKGBUILD_guidelines Please also do not top-post. On Wed, Jan 2, 2013 at 9:56 PM, Jonathan Steel m...@jsteel.org wrote: On Wed, Jan 02, 2013 at 01:47:00PM +, Jonathan Steel wrote: On Wed, Jan 02, 2013 at 01:47:23PM +0800, Daniel YC Lin wrote: Could anyone help me to get the permission to adopt 'fossil'. I've created a 'fossil-fossil' PKGBUILD. You should not do this. Instead post a link to the updated PKGBUILD in the comments. I will delete this duplicate. On further inspection, your package should be fossil-git. Please upload with this new name and I will merge it. fossil should follow the stable version. But, I want to adopt the 'fossil' too. I've reported the out-date and e-mailed the current maintainer, but no reply for at least one or two weeks. Check your sent items and reply once it has been two weeks with no response. (Check the outdate time, it is more than one month). There may be good reasons why a package has not been updated, so an email to the maintainer is what we go on. -- Jonathan Steel pgp3BRDp1uQCs.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: [aur-general] merge request
On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 01:33:50AM +0100, Lone_Wolf wrote: Hi, Last weekend i added radeonSI to my mesa-git packages, and decided this was a good time to change the packagenames to more accurately reflect the chipsets they are intended for. please merge mesa-r600g-git [1] into mesa-r300-r600-radeonsi-git [2] Done. lib32-mesa-r600g-git [3] into lib32-mesa-r300-r600-radeonsi-git [4] . Done. Thanks in advance. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/mesa-r600g-git/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/mesa-r300-r600-radeonsi-git/ [3] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/lib32-mesa-r600g-git/ [4] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/lib32-mesa-r300-r600-radeonsi-git/ Thanks -- Jonathan Steel pgpe79lf8g2AR.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: [aur-general] Merge packages
On Fri, 18 Jan 2013 13:33:43 -0200 Hilton Medeiros medeiros.hil...@gmail.com wrote: On 01/17/2013 10:44 PM, Evangelos Foutras wrote: On 18/01/13 02:36, Jonathan Arnold wrote: I've created a new package[1], source-code-pro-fonts for Adobe's Source Code Pro font that includes both the TTF and OTF files. Can you merge and delete the otf-source-code-pro[2] and ttf-source-code-pro[3] packages with it? The otf-source-code-pro maintainer and I discussed it on the otf-source-code-pro package page and he's good with that. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/source-code-pro-fonts/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/otf-source-code-pro/notify/ [3] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/ttf-source-code-pro/ Done, thanks. Hello, the new package 'source-code-pro-fonts' installs both TTF and OTF. With both installed how do I know which one will be used by default on GNOME and other applications? We have lots of ttf- and otf- packages on AUR, and I thought we had good reason for that. Is this a new way to package fonts? I was the maintainer for the ttf-source-code-pro package and noticed that Adobe had started to put both the OTF and the TTF together in the same zip file, so I figured it would be okay to install both. Further investigation tells me that some apps only want to use TTF, while most will use OTF if it is there or TTF otherwise. However, I was not able to uncover what happens if both are there and which one an app might use or even how to tell an app to use one instead of the other. Or if it makes any difference. As they are released simultaneously in the same file, it is easier to keep one package up to date. And I did ask on the otf package if it would be okay and/or better to just combine them. But if there is a sound techical reason for having 2 different packages, we could go back to that easily enough. -- Jonathan ArnoldWebstream: http://hieronymus.soup.io Talent wins games, but team work and intelligence wins championships. Michael Jordan
