Re: [aur-general] Fwd: Re: [PRQ#4315] Deletion Request for python2-radicale

[G. Schlisio]

hi hugo,

sorry for causing so much trouble with your package.
i could have seen it was a dependency in the AUR webinterface.
i'll be more careful next time.
sorry again and have a good time.

georg

-- 
Was bedeutet dieses PGP? http://dukun.de/pgp/

http://www.towel-day.com. am 25.5.

http://katzen.dukun.de - jetzt mit RSS-Feed!

jabber/xmpp: x...@dukun.de

"Lead, follow, or get out of the way!"



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: [aur-general] Fwd: Re: [PRQ#4315] Deletion Request for python2-radicale

[Johannes Löthberg]

On 13/11, WorMzy Tykashi wrote:

On 13 November 2015 at 01:10, Johannes Löthberg  wrote:



For some reason AUR user WorMzy had created an empty pkgbase without
actually pushing a package


Yeah, my bad. Curiosity got the better of me after reading the thread,
so I checked out the package to see if it was still there, and what
state it was in; but then I couldn't find any way to disown without
pushing first and using the web interface, which I didn't want to do
because then I'd be listed as the submitter, which wouldn't be fair.
'ssh a...@aur.archlinux.org restore' didn't work: 'restore: package
base exists: python2-radicale'. Sorry for the inconvenience, Hugo.



You would have been listed as the submitter even if the pkgbase would 
have been disowned instead of deleted. Anyway, in the future you can go 
directly to the pkgbase page[0] and request a deletion from there.


[0]: https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/

--
Sincerely,
 Johannes Löthberg
 PGP Key ID: 0x50FB9B273A9D0BB5
 https://theos.kyriasis.com/~kyrias/


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Re: [aur-general] Fwd: Re: [PRQ#4315] Deletion Request for python2-radicale

[WorMzy Tykashi]

On 13 November 2015 at 01:10, Johannes Löthberg  wrote:

>
> For some reason AUR user WorMzy had created an empty pkgbase without
> actually pushing a package

Yeah, my bad. Curiosity got the better of me after reading the thread,
so I checked out the package to see if it was still there, and what
state it was in; but then I couldn't find any way to disown without
pushing first and using the web interface, which I didn't want to do
because then I'd be listed as the submitter, which wouldn't be fair.
'ssh a...@aur.archlinux.org restore' didn't work: 'restore: package
base exists: python2-radicale'. Sorry for the inconvenience, Hugo.

It's a well written PKGBUILD, with one minor niggle -- arch should be
an array, not a string. I don't think you pushed your v1.0.1 update
before it was deleted though (or if you did, it wasn't part of the git
history).

Cheers,


WorMzy

Re: [aur-general] Fwd: Re: [PRQ#4315] Deletion Request for python2-radicale

[Frederik “Freso” S . Olesen]

Den 13-11-2015 kl. 00:54 skrev Simon Hanna:
> On Wed, Nov 11, 2015 at 02:44:49PM -0300, Hugo Osvaldo Barrera wrote:
>> Can we have this package restored?
> AUR 4 does not actually delete the packages, they are just hidden in the web 
> interface.
> You should be able to clone and push them again.

This will not restore comments (or votes) though.

-- 
Namasté,
Frederik “Freso” S. Olesen 
AUR: https://aur.archlinux.org/account/Freso
Wiki: https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/User:Freso



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: [aur-general] Fwd: Re: [PRQ#4315] Deletion Request for python2-radicale

[Johannes Löthberg]

On 12/11, Hugo Osvaldo Barrera wrote:



On Thu, Nov 12, 2015, at 20:54, Simon Hanna wrote:

On Wed, Nov 11, 2015 at 02:44:49PM -0300, Hugo Osvaldo Barrera wrote:
> Even after the following discussion on aur-requets, python2-radicale was
> deleted. There's not a full tree of broken packages, since this
> dependency is missing.
>
> I'm amazed at how the TU ignored the whole thread AND the fact that
> other packages explicitly depend on this one.
>
> Can we have this package restored?
AUR 4 does not actually delete the packages, they are just hidden in the
web interface.
You should be able to clone and push them again.
I don't know if you have to change the package or not,
in case you need, just bump the pkgrel
Email had 1 attachment:
+ signature.asc
  1k (application/pgp-signature)


Nope. I can pull, but not push:

$ git push
git-receive-pack: permission denied: hobarrera
fatal: Could not read from remote repository.

Please make sure you have the correct access rights
and the repository exists.



For some reason AUR user WorMzy had created an empty pkgbase without 
actually pushing a package, which isn't the first time I've seen it 
done.. Anyway, I deleted the empty pkgbase, should be able to push now.


--
Sincerely,
 Johannes Löthberg
 PGP Key ID: 0x50FB9B273A9D0BB5
 https://theos.kyriasis.com/~kyrias/


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Re: [aur-general] Fwd: Re: [PRQ#4315] Deletion Request for python2-radicale

[Hugo Osvaldo Barrera]

On Thu, Nov 12, 2015, at 20:54, Simon Hanna wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 11, 2015 at 02:44:49PM -0300, Hugo Osvaldo Barrera wrote:
> > Even after the following discussion on aur-requets, python2-radicale was
> > deleted. There's not a full tree of broken packages, since this
> > dependency is missing.
> > 
> > I'm amazed at how the TU ignored the whole thread AND the fact that
> > other packages explicitly depend on this one.
> > 
> > Can we have this package restored?
> AUR 4 does not actually delete the packages, they are just hidden in the
> web interface.
> You should be able to clone and push them again. 
> I don't know if you have to change the package or not,
> in case you need, just bump the pkgrel
> Email had 1 attachment:
> + signature.asc
>   1k (application/pgp-signature)

Nope. I can pull, but not push:

$ git push
git-receive-pack: permission denied: hobarrera
fatal: Could not read from remote repository.

Please make sure you have the correct access rights
and the repository exists.


-- 
Hugo Osvaldo Barrera

Re: [aur-general] Fwd: Re: [PRQ#4315] Deletion Request for python2-radicale

[Simon Hanna]

On Wed, Nov 11, 2015 at 02:44:49PM -0300, Hugo Osvaldo Barrera wrote:
> Even after the following discussion on aur-requets, python2-radicale was
> deleted. There's not a full tree of broken packages, since this
> dependency is missing.
> 
> I'm amazed at how the TU ignored the whole thread AND the fact that
> other packages explicitly depend on this one.
> 
> Can we have this package restored?
AUR 4 does not actually delete the packages, they are just hidden in the web 
interface.
You should be able to clone and push them again. 
I don't know if you have to change the package or not,
in case you need, just bump the pkgrel


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Re: [aur-general] Fwd: Re: [PRQ#4315] Deletion Request for python2-radicale

[Jaroslav Lichtblau]

On Thu, Nov 12, 2015 at 02:53:27PM +0100, Jens Adam wrote:
> Thu, 12 Nov 2015 13:23:23 +0100
> "G. Schlisio" :
> 
> > is there any log, where we ordinary users can see, what TU
> > to adress with a complaint now?
> 
> Yes, quoting the aur-requests mail:
> 
> > Request #4315 has been accepted by Dragonlord [1].
> > [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/Dragonlord/

Hi guys,
my bad and I'm sorry for the inconvenience. I've missed your discussion
and as the original request seemed allright I went ahead accepting it.

> And on a more general note:
> Should TUs be required to subscribe to aur-requests?
>
> --byte

I bet most of us are. Not missing to read all the messages
is another question.

Regards,
Jaroslav.




signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Re: [aur-general] Fwd: Re: [PRQ#4315] Deletion Request for python2-radicale

[Jens Adam]

Thu, 12 Nov 2015 13:23:23 +0100
"G. Schlisio" :

> is there any log, where we ordinary users can see, what TU
> to adress with a complaint now?

Yes, quoting the aur-requests mail:

> Request #4315 has been accepted by Dragonlord [1].
> [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/Dragonlord/

And on a more general note:
Should TUs be required to subscribe to aur-requests?

--byte


pgpBBWgWVebMi.pgp
Description: Digitale Signatur von OpenPGP

Re: [aur-general] Fwd: Re: [PRQ#4315] Deletion Request for python2-radicale

[G. Schlisio]

Am 11.11.2015 um 18:44 schrieb Hugo Osvaldo Barrera:
> Even after the following discussion on aur-requets, python2-radicale was
> deleted. There's not a full tree of broken packages, since this
> dependency is missing.
> 
> I'm amazed at how the TU ignored the whole thread AND the fact that
> other packages explicitly depend on this one.
> 
> Can we have this package restored?

i have to mark here, the discussion came to conclusion, that this
package is still needed and the request (filed by me) was regarded resolved.
is there any log, where we ordinary users can see, what TU to adress
with a complaint now?

georg



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

[aur-general] Fwd: Re: [PRQ#4315] Deletion Request for python2-radicale

[Hugo Osvaldo Barrera]

Even after the following discussion on aur-requets, python2-radicale was
deleted. There's not a full tree of broken packages, since this
dependency is missing.

I'm amazed at how the TU ignored the whole thread AND the fact that
other packages explicitly depend on this one.

Can we have this package restored?

On Mon, Nov 9, 2015, at 12:49, Hugo Osvaldo Barrera wrote:
> 
> 
> On Mon, Nov 9, 2015, at 12:37, G. Schlisio wrote:
> > >> fordprefect [1] filed a deletion request for python2-radicale [2]:
> > >>
> > >> this is an outdated duplicate (exept it uses python2) of the package
> > >> radicale.
> > >> there is no need for a python2-version, since this is not a library,
> > >> python3 is standard in archlinux and the pkgbuild is easily tweaked to
> > >> use python2 in the rare case someone really needs it.
> > >>
> > >> [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/fordprefect/
> > >> [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/python2-radicale/
> > > 
> > > 
> > > While the above is mostly true, this package exists as a transitive
> > > dependency for khard, which is python3 incompatible.
> > > 
> > > This package contains a standalone script, but is also a dependency for
> > > others, particularly python2-vdirsyncer, on which khard depends.
> > > 
> > 
> > i see. is this the reason for the ancient version as well? if so, the
> > flag should be removed and the legacy should reflect in the packages
> > name. otherwise i at least advice to update this.
> > 
> > Email had 1 attachment:
> > + signature.asc
> >   1k (application/pgp-signature)
> 
> Nope, it was out-of-date merely out of me not paying attention. It's
> been updated now.
> 
> -- 
> Hugo Osvaldo Barrera


-- 
Hugo Osvaldo Barrera