Re: [aur-general] Deletion Request

[Rafael Fontenelle]

Em qua., 8 de abr. de 2020 às 17:06, Diab Neiroukh via aur-general
 escreveu:
>
> I accidentally pushed a new package to "kayan-gtk-theme-git" instead of
> "krayan-gtk-theme-git" this morning (now both exist and I will only
> update the latter) and would like to request it's removal. Apologies
> for the disturbance.
>
> Thanks,
> Diab Neiroukh

Hi there.

Deletion requests should be made in the own package's page in the
AURweb interface. For more info, see
https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/AUR_submission_guidelines#Requests

Cheers,
Rafael Fontenelle

[aur-general] Deletion Request

[Diab Neiroukh via aur-general]

I accidentally pushed a new package to "kayan-gtk-theme-git" instead of
"krayan-gtk-theme-git" this morning (now both exist and I will only
update the latter) and would like to request it's removal. Apologies
for the disturbance.

Thanks,
Diab Neiroukh

Re: [aur-general] Deletion request for ipython

[asm0dey via aur-general]

But I have other repositories screwed up the same way ☹


On Fri, 2019-08-30 at 09:56 +0200, Alad Wenter via aur-general wrote:
> On 8/30/19 9:09 AM, asm0dey via aur-general wrote:
> > Oh hell, AUR declines history rewrites.
> > 
> > I'm deeply sorry, folks ☹ I didn't think that this is irreversible
> > (this is git, it's about history rewriting!). How can I fix what
> > I've
> > done?
> 
> You can't. It also doesn't matter because I've accepted the two
> requests 
> for reason of duplicate.
> 
> https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/AUR_submission_guidelines#Rules_of_submission
> 
> 
> Alad


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Re: [aur-general] Deletion request for ipython

[Alad Wenter via aur-general]

On 8/30/19 9:09 AM, asm0dey via aur-general wrote:

Oh hell, AUR declines history rewrites.

I'm deeply sorry, folks ☹ I didn't think that this is irreversible
(this is git, it's about history rewriting!). How can I fix what I've
done?


You can't. It also doesn't matter because I've accepted the two requests 
for reason of duplicate.


https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/AUR_submission_guidelines#Rules_of_submission

Alad

Re: [aur-general] Deletion request for ipython

[asm0dey via aur-general]

Oh hell, AUR declines history rewrites.

I'm deeply sorry, folks ☹ I didn't think that this is irreversible
(this is git, it's about history rewriting!). How can I fix what I've
done?
-- 
Regrads,
Pasha

On Thu, 2019-08-29 at 22:09 -0400, Eli Schwartz via aur-general wrote:
> On 8/29/19 5:35 AM, asm0dey via aur-general wrote:
> > 2. Comments are absolutely random, but… I just think that when
> > there
> > are no important changes in repository, just version bumps then no
> > comment can make sense. Of course I'm absolutely ready to rewrite
> > history to make them just normal boring comments.
> 
> So relay that relevant information.
> 
> git commit -m 'upstream release'
> 
> (
> https://www.archlinux.org/packages/community/any/aurpublish/
>  will even
> cleverly insert this exact commit message for you, if it detects a
> pkgver bump.)
> 
> Instead of using commit messages which relay the message "I consider
> both myself and my packages to be a laughingstock, useful only for
> providing demented humor by way of insulting my own intelligence".
> 
> ...
> 
> Do you even realize that site is *satire*?
> 
> ...
> 
> Your claim that there is "just version bumps" is factually incorrect:
> 
> https://aur.archlinux.org/cgit/aur.git/commit/PKGBUILD?h=ipython-7&id=42c1ff5d25a9ddc034154b5651483076658b6ec5
> 
> 
> 
> 


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Re: [aur-general] Deletion request for ipython

[asm0dey via aur-general]

-- 
Regrads,
Pasha

On Thu, 2019-08-29 at 22:09 -0400, Eli Schwartz via aur-general wrote:
> On 8/29/19 5:35 AM, asm0dey via aur-general wrote:
> > 2. Comments are absolutely random, but… I just think that when
> > there
> > are no important changes in repository, just version bumps then no
> > comment can make sense. Of course I'm absolutely ready to rewrite
> > history to make them just normal boring comments.
> 
> So relay that relevant information.
> 
> git commit -m 'upstream release'
> 
> (
> https://www.archlinux.org/packages/community/any/aurpublish/
>  will even
> cleverly insert this exact commit message for you, if it detects a
> pkgver bump.)
> 
> Instead of using commit messages which relay the message "I consider
> both myself and my packages to be a laughingstock, useful only for
> providing demented humor by way of insulting my own intelligence".
> 
> ...
> 
> Do you even realize that site is *satire*?

Of course I do ☺ You know it's even a bit offensive to think about your
partner that he is *such* dumb.
> 
> ...
> 
> Your claim that there is "just version bumps" is factually incorrect:
> 
> https://aur.archlinux.org/cgit/aur.git/commit/PKGBUILD?h=ipython-7&id=42c1ff5d25a9ddc034154b5651483076658b6ec5

Which is still version bump with added dependency. I wouldn't need to
change pkgrel if I would add this dependency along with version bump.

Anyways I accept your critics and going to rewrite history of my
packages.


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Re: [aur-general] Deletion request for ipython

[Eli Schwartz via aur-general]

On 8/29/19 5:35 AM, asm0dey via aur-general wrote:
> 2. Comments are absolutely random, but… I just think that when there
> are no important changes in repository, just version bumps then no
> comment can make sense. Of course I'm absolutely ready to rewrite
> history to make them just normal boring comments.

So relay that relevant information.

git commit -m 'upstream release'

(https://www.archlinux.org/packages/community/any/aurpublish/ will even
cleverly insert this exact commit message for you, if it detects a
pkgver bump.)

Instead of using commit messages which relay the message "I consider
both myself and my packages to be a laughingstock, useful only for
providing demented humor by way of insulting my own intelligence".

...

Do you even realize that site is *satire*?

...

Your claim that there is "just version bumps" is factually incorrect:

https://aur.archlinux.org/cgit/aur.git/commit/PKGBUILD?h=ipython-7&id=42c1ff5d25a9ddc034154b5651483076658b6ec5


-- 
Eli Schwartz
Bug Wrangler and Trusted User



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: [aur-general] Deletion request for ipython

[Antonio Rojas via aur-general]

Hi Antonio, hi community

You've requested deletion of ipython-7 package, mainaned by me with 2
comments:

1. Duplicate of python-prompt_toolkit
2. absurd commit messages 


You mean I've requested deletion of ipython-7 as a duplicate of ipython, 
and of python-prompt_toolkit-2 as a duplicate of python-prompt_tolkit




1. Yes, it's duplicate, but it wasn't at a time of publishing. I'll
tell you more: community was long behind AUR at that moment because it
needs more time to go from upstream to community and less time from
upstream to AUR. 


Regardless of the original situation - they are now clear duplicates. 


2. Comments are absolutely random, but… I just think that when there
are no important changes in repository, just version bumps then no
comment can make sense. Of course I'm absolutely ready to rewrite
history to make them just normal boring comments.


No matter how unimportant or boring they may seem to you, relevant commit 
messages are fundamental for any kind of serious public repository. Using 
such random, facetious commit messages is unacceptable. In any case, that's 
not the main reason for the deletion request.

[aur-general] Deletion request for ipython

[asm0dey via aur-general]

Hi Antonio, hi community

You've requested deletion of ipython-7 package, mainaned by me with 2
comments:

1. Duplicate of python-prompt_toolkit
2. absurd commit messages

While both of them are true I would like to comment on both:

1. Yes, it's duplicate, but it wasn't at a time of publishing. I'll
tell you more: community was long behind AUR at that moment because it
needs more time to go from upstream to community and less time from
upstream to AUR. 

If you think that it's not the case — then we can safely delete it

2. Comments are absolutely random, but… I just think that when there
are no important changes in repository, just version bumps then no
comment can make sense. Of course I'm absolutely ready to rewrite
history to make them just normal boring comments.


-- 
Regrads,
Pasha


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Re: [aur-general] Deletion request for python-libtorrent-rasterbar

[Florian Bruhin]

* Charles Pigott via aur-general  [2016-07-31 
22:52:36 +0100]:
> After I noticed this package had gone missing from the AUR (git repo
> was still available, package page was 404ing), I resurrected it as it
> had broken the dependency for magnet2torrent-git
> 
> Interestingly, the packaging and install somehow worked fine for me
> the first time, but then it was pointed out to me that there were file
> conflicts between it and one of its own dependencies,
> libtorrent-rasterbar. All of the files in the python package, for
> instance. Which happen to be all of the files in it.
> 
> As such, python-libtorrent-rasterbar has been fully replaced by
> libtorrent-rasterbar and can be (re-)removed from AUR. I'll work on
> getting the dependency on magnet2torrent fixed instead.

Go to the AUR page of the package and click "Submit request" there.

Florian

-- 
http://www.the-compiler.org | m...@the-compiler.org (Mail/XMPP)
   GPG: 916E B0C8 FD55 A072 | http://the-compiler.org/pubkey.asc
 I love long mails! | http://email.is-not-s.ms/


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

[aur-general] Deletion request for python-libtorrent-rasterbar

[Charles Pigott via aur-general]

After I noticed this package had gone missing from the AUR (git repo
was still available, package page was 404ing), I resurrected it as it
had broken the dependency for magnet2torrent-git

Interestingly, the packaging and install somehow worked fine for me
the first time, but then it was pointed out to me that there were file
conflicts between it and one of its own dependencies,
libtorrent-rasterbar. All of the files in the python package, for
instance. Which happen to be all of the files in it.

As such, python-libtorrent-rasterbar has been fully replaced by
libtorrent-rasterbar and can be (re-)removed from AUR. I'll work on
getting the dependency on magnet2torrent fixed instead.

C

Re: [aur-general] Deletion Request: razer_chroma_drivers-git

[Ralf Mardorf]

On Thu, 14 Jul 2016 22:21:26 +0200, Roland Singer wrote:
>Thanks!
>
>Am 14.07.2016 um 22:19 schrieb Ralf Mardorf:
>> On Thu, 14 Jul 2016 22:13:46 +0200, Roland Singer wrote:  
>>> Please delete this package:
>>> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/razer_chroma_drivers-git/  
>>
>> Visit the link and in the box on the left side click "Submit
>> Request". The default is "Deletion".

:D

You found it, despite my wrong instructions on how to reach it.

:)

Re: [aur-general] Deletion Request: razer_chroma_drivers-git

[Roland Singer]

Thanks!

Am 14.07.2016 um 22:19 schrieb Ralf Mardorf:

On Thu, 14 Jul 2016 22:13:46 +0200, Roland Singer wrote:

Please delete this package:
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/razer_chroma_drivers-git/


Visit the link and in the box on the left side click "Submit Request".
The default is "Deletion".

Regards,
Ralf

Re: [aur-general] Deletion Request: razer_chroma_drivers-git

[Ralf Mardorf]

On Thu, 14 Jul 2016 22:13:46 +0200, Roland Singer wrote:
>Please delete this package: 
>https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/razer_chroma_drivers-git/

Visit the link and in the box on the left side click "Submit Request".
The default is "Deletion".

Regards,
Ralf

[aur-general] Deletion Request: razer_chroma_drivers-git

[Roland Singer]

Please delete this package: 
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/razer_chroma_drivers-git/


I renamed it to razer_chroma_drivers and razer_chroma_drivers-dkms

Thx!

Re: [aur-general] deletion request

[Doug Newgard]

On 2014-07-24 08:10, Jose Riha wrote:

hello, please remove flac2mp3 from aur as it has been replaced by
flac2mp3-git. thank you, jose


1. We have a new "File Request" link on the right hand side of the AUR 
pages for this kind of thing.
2. flac2mp3 uses a stable release, it shouldn't be replaced by a Git 
package.
3. Your -git PKGBUILD uses a very old template. Please read 
https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/VCS_PKGBUILD_Guidelines

[aur-general] deletion request

[Jose Riha]

hello, please remove flac2mp3 from aur as it has been replaced by 
flac2mp3-git. thank you, jose

[aur-general] Deletion Request for keinett-minecraft

[Giovanni Santini]

Good evening to everybody,
actually I fixed the two delete requests for the package in topic:
- 1st one was made because of many problems of my package, which are now 
fixed (below there's the deletion request email)

- 2nd one was made by me for error.
Waiting for requests to be deleted.
Regards,
Giovanni 'ItachiSan' Santini

Il 15/07/2014 14:45, not...@aur.archlinux.org ha scritto:

Trilby [1] filed a deletion request for keinett-minecraft [2]:

All the source files have been uploaded here to the AUR as mentioned
in bbs thread:
https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?pid=1436290#p1436290

[1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/Trilby/
[2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/keinett-minecraft/

Re: [aur-general] deletion request mingw-w64-getrusage

[Lukas Jirkovsky]

On 1 July 2014 14:17, xantares 09  wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Could someone delete mingw-w64-getrusage:
> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/mingw-w64-getrusage/
>
> I've renamed it to mingw-w64-resource.
>
> Regards,
> xan.
>

Removed

Re: [aur-general] deletion request mingw-w64-getrusage

[Johannes Löthberg]

On 01/07, xantares 09 wrote:

Hello,

Could someone delete mingw-w64-getrusage:
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/mingw-w64-getrusage/



Hey,

Delete/merge/orphan requests should now go to the new aur-requests 
mailinglist [1].


[1]: https://mailman.archlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/aur-requests

--
Sincerely,
 Johannes Löthberg
 PGP Key ID: 3A9D0BB5


pgpZCBIiWKGV_.pgp
Description: PGP signature

[aur-general] deletion request mingw-w64-getrusage

[xantares 09]

Hello,

Could someone delete mingw-w64-getrusage:
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/mingw-w64-getrusage/

I've renamed it to mingw-w64-resource.

Regards,
xan.
  

Re: [aur-general] deletion request

[Evgeniy Alekseev]

On Tuesday 01 July 2014 10:25:05 Moritz Rudert wrote:
> please delete rkhunter-archlinux
> (https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/rkhunter-archlinux/)
> 
> Its not neccessary anymore, because rkhunter has fixed journald and
> iproute stuff upstream.

Done, thanks!

And as it was said by Johannes please use another mailing list for future 
requests =)
-- 
С уважением, Е.Алексеев.
Sincerely yours, E.Alekseev.

e-mail: darkarca...@mail.ru
ICQ: 407-398-235
Jabber: arca...@jabber.ru

signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Re: [aur-general] deletion request

[Johannes Löthberg]

On 01/07, Moritz Rudert wrote:

Hi,

please delete rkhunter-archlinux
(https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/rkhunter-archlinux/)



Hey,

Requests should now go to the new aur-requests mailinglist [1]

[1]: https://mailman.archlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/aur-requests

--
Sincerely,
 Johannes Löthberg
 PGP Key ID: 3A9D0BB5


pgpBOS109zv6d.pgp
Description: PGP signature

[aur-general] deletion request

[Moritz Rudert]

Hi,

please delete rkhunter-archlinux
(https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/rkhunter-archlinux/)

Its not neccessary anymore, because rkhunter has fixed journald and
iproute stuff upstream.

Thanks and greetings
Moritz Rudert

Re: [aur-general] Deletion request

[Evgeniy Alekseev]

On Tuesday 24 June 2014 08:34:27 Alexey D. wrote:
> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/opera-dev/

It had several votes and comments, so I've merged it into opera-developer [1]. 
Thank you.

BTW, I think that 'opera-dev' is more convenient package name, but according 
to the upstream [2] this version should be named as 'opera-developer'.

1. https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/opera-developer/
2. http://www.opera.com/developer
-- 
С уважением, Е.Алексеев.
Sincerely yours, E.Alekseev.

e-mail: darkarca...@mail.ru
ICQ: 407-398-235
Jabber: arca...@jabber.ru

signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

[aur-general] Deletion request

[Alexey D.]

https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/opera-dev/

Re: [aur-general] deletion request

[Evgeniy Alekseev]

On Thursday 19 June 2014 21:21:24 Jeremy Audet wrote:
> Please delete ruby-reek. [1] As a tool intended primarily for use by users
> on the command line, it is badly named, and I have uploaded reek [2] to
> take its place. There are no votes or comments of worth, so there is little
> reason to merge packages. I am the maintainer of both packages.


Done, thank you.
--
С уважением, Е.Алексеев.
Sincerely yours, E.Alekseev.

e-mail: darkarca...@mail.ru
ICQ: 407-398-235
Jabber: arca...@jabber.ru

signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Re: [aur-general] deletion request

[Jeremy Audet]

bump

[aur-general] deletion request

[Jeremy Audet]

Please delete ruby-reek. [1] As a tool intended primarily for use by users
on the command line, it is badly named, and I have uploaded reek [2] to
take its place. There are no votes or comments of worth, so there is little
reason to merge packages. I am the maintainer of both packages.

— Jeremy "Ichimonji10" Audet

[1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/ruby-reek/
[2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/reek/

Re: [aur-general] Deletion request

[Maxime Gauduin]

On Fri, Jun 13, 2014 at 3:16 AM, John D Jones III 
wrote:

> Please delete https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/perl-cpan-meta-
> requirements/ the module it provides is now in core perl
> --
> Thanks,
> John D Jones III
> UNIX Zealot; Perl Lover
> unixgeek1...@gmail.com
> jnbek1...@gmail.com
> http://zoelife4u.org/
>

Deleted, thx.

-- 
Maxime

[aur-general] Deletion request

[John D Jones III]

Please delete 
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/perl-cpan-meta-requirements/ the 
module it provides is now in core perl

--
Thanks,
John D Jones III
UNIX Zealot; Perl Lover
unixgeek1...@gmail.com
jnbek1...@gmail.com
http://zoelife4u.org/

Re: [aur-general] Deletion request

[Maxime Gauduin]

On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 6:21 AM, John D Jones III 
wrote:

> Please remove https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/perl-parse-cpan-meta/
> the module it provides is now part of CORE perl.
> --
> Thanks,
> John D Jones III
> UNIX Zealot; Perl Lover
> unixgeek1...@gmail.com
> jnbek1...@gmail.com
> http://zoelife4u.org/
>

Deleted as well, thx.

-- 
Maxime

[aur-general] Deletion request

[John D Jones III]

Please remove https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/perl-parse-cpan-meta/
the module it provides is now part of CORE perl.
--
Thanks,
John D Jones III
UNIX Zealot; Perl Lover
unixgeek1...@gmail.com
jnbek1...@gmail.com
http://zoelife4u.org/

[aur-general] Deletion request: python2-mutagen

[Florian Dejonckheere]

Hi

Please delete python2-mutagen [1], as a mutagen package is already provided
in [extra].

[1]: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/python2-mutagen/

Thanks


*Florian Dejonckheere*

flor...@floriandejonckheere.be
http://floriandejonckheere.be 
skype: floriandejonckheere

Re: [aur-general] Deletion request

[Maxime Gauduin]

On Tue, Jun 3, 2014 at 2:01 PM, Justin Dray  wrote:

> Please remove the following pkgbuild:
> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/xf86-input-evtouch/
>
> Upstream is dead, package hasn't been able to be built in *years* and the
> maintainer has said as much on the package comments, and someone has also
> put this on the archwiki touchscreen page.
>
> Regards,
> Justin Dray
> E: jus...@dray.be
> M: 0433348284
>

Gone, thx.

-- 
Maxime

[aur-general] Deletion request

[Justin Dray]

Please remove the following pkgbuild:
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/xf86-input-evtouch/

Upstream is dead, package hasn't been able to be built in *years* and the
maintainer has said as much on the package comments, and someone has also
put this on the archwiki touchscreen page.

Regards,
Justin Dray
E: jus...@dray.be
M: 0433348284

Re: [aur-general] deletion request -- pypy3-setuptools

[Felix Yan]

On Monday, June 02, 2014 16:29:11 lilydjwg wrote:
> pypy-setuptools[1] provides pypy3-setuptools[2] now, so let's delete the
> later.
> 
> [1]: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/pypy-setuptools/
> [2]: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/pypy3-setuptools/

Removed, thanks.

Regards,
Felix Yan

signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

[aur-general] deletion request -- pypy3-setuptools

[lilydjwg]

pypy-setuptools[1] provides pypy3-setuptools[2] now, so let's delete the
later.

[1]: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/pypy-setuptools/
[2]: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/pypy3-setuptools/

-- 
Best regards,
lilydjwg

Re: [aur-general] Deletion request: selinux-sysvinit

[Felix Yan]

On Friday, May 30, 2014 21:12:20 Timothée Ravier wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> Please remove the selinux-sysvinit package [1] from the AUR. It's
> extremely unlikely that anyone will ever need this one anymore :D.
> 
> [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/selinux-sysvinit/

Removed, thanks.

Regards,
Felix Yan

signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Re: [aur-general] Deletion Request: python-montage

[Felix Yan]

On Friday, May 30, 2014 12:58:15 Nico Nell wrote:
> python-montage has been replaced by a newer wrapper with a different name
> and better functionality. I would like to have this package (that I
> submitted and maintain) deleted.
> 
> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/python-montage/

Removed, thanks.

Regards,
Felix Yan

signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

[aur-general] Deletion request: selinux-sysvinit

[Timothée Ravier]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512

Hi,

Please remove the selinux-sysvinit package [1] from the AUR. It's
extremely unlikely that anyone will ever need this one anymore :D.

[1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/selinux-sysvinit/

- -- 
Timothée Ravier
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux)

iQEcBAEBCgAGBQJTiNgUAAoJENsngY94aI+DdcsIAMZNeFgmy+oO3zaADehvr1fl
RZ7SV+dPw1uoYGg3PqeMARRNUvAnNNOi9ZOMjbkar4WH9jC/cL3N7iPzRpBpkFjZ
zUkjkfEBcZM7OZ+g0yLwiDZ7UUydWCSzA5KxB/L8aYaF8IkRRfGL0KvlatQXlHph
ONlqYPBlA2QBOwmqqyd+6DuGnGSj0KuilaGFVZgpFBEGlcfvLdXCDhtI4tXMAxbO
OS8J7ODO5h/0biwfmpSJWQHKd0fR7Ikqeb+6vhi0X91BxFoJ8sIKNcWa8f5dqbXu
EKyc7XlIgN/Ose2w0hCJRvWc7YAyQHJkLvdMzAFkLCN1h8woqFmDK3sGHzd0g24=
=a1UU
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

[aur-general] Deletion Request: python-montage

[Nico Nell]

python-montage has been replaced by a newer wrapper with a different name
and better functionality. I would like to have this package (that I
submitted and maintain) deleted.

https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/python-montage/

Thanks.

Re: [aur-general] Deletion Request

[Evgeniy Alekseev]

On Wednesday 28 May 2014 20:52:31 Hong Shick Pak wrote:
> Cleaning dead packages:
> 
> Dead source, out-of-date, orphan, (wrong name)
> New version: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/ubudao-icon-theme/
> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/ubuntu-style-icon-theme/
> 
> Dead source, out-of-date, orphan
> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/codeanalyst/
> 
> Dead source, out-of-date, orphan, duplicate
> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/emacs-gtranslate/
> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/emacs-google-translate/

All done. I've removed both google-translate packages since they both are 
orphaned and out-of-dated and they have same PKGBUILDs (so they both have link 
to the dead source).
Thank you.
-- 
С уважением, Е.Алексеев.
Sincerely yours, E.Alekseev.

e-mail: darkarca...@mail.ru
ICQ: 407-398-235
Jabber: arca...@jabber.ru

signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Re: [aur-general] Deletion request

[Evgeniy Alekseev]

On Wednesday 28 May 2014 23:51:44 Hugo Osvaldo Barrera wrote:
> Please delete
> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/planetary-annihilation-curl/
> 
> It used to build a required version of libcurl for planetary-annihilation,
> but the latest upstream tarball includes libcurl.so.4, so this package
> is no longer needed.

Removed, thank you.
-- 
С уважением, Е.Алексеев.
Sincerely yours, E.Alekseev.

e-mail: darkarca...@mail.ru
ICQ: 407-398-235
Jabber: arca...@jabber.ru

signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

[aur-general] Deletion Request

[Hong Shick Pak]

Cleaning dead packages:

Dead source, out-of-date, orphan, (wrong name)
New version: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/ubudao-icon-theme/
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/ubuntu-style-icon-theme/

Dead source, out-of-date, orphan
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/codeanalyst/

Dead source, out-of-date, orphan, duplicate
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/emacs-gtranslate/
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/emacs-google-translate/

Hong

[aur-general] Deletion request

[Hugo Osvaldo Barrera]

Please delete
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/planetary-annihilation-curl/

It used to build a required version of libcurl for planetary-annihilation,
but the latest upstream tarball includes libcurl.so.4, so this package
is no longer needed.

Thanks,

-- 
Hugo Osvaldo Barrera
A: No, it doesn't make sense.
Q: Should I include quotations *after* my reply?


pgpz48ov1dUQI.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Re: [aur-general] Deletion request: eclectus

[Lukas Jirkovsky]

On Wed, May 28, 2014 at 9:00 PM, Rémy Marquis  wrote:
> I am the maintainer of the eclectus package. This software stopped
> working a long time ago, due to change of a dependency break. No
> upstream activity for about 4 years, and it seems this software won't
> be updated by its original author. No additional votes in years
> either. Please delete.
>
> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/eclectus

Removed, thx.

Lukas

[aur-general] Deletion request: eclectus

[Rémy Marquis]

I am the maintainer of the eclectus package. This software stopped
working a long time ago, due to change of a dependency break. No
upstream activity for about 4 years, and it seems this software won't
be updated by its original author. No additional votes in years
either. Please delete.

https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/eclectus

Re: [aur-general] Deletion request: python-errorhandler

[Felix Yan]

On Tuesday, May 27, 2014 00:53:02 Aaron DeVore wrote:
> I just adopted python2-errorhandler because it is an optdepends of a
> package that I maintain. python-errorhandler is a duplicate and upstream
> does not support Python 3 at this time.
> 
> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/python-errorhandler

Removed, thanks.

Regards,
Felix Yan

signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

[aur-general] Deletion request: python-errorhandler

[Aaron DeVore]

I just adopted python2-errorhandler because it is an optdepends of a
package that I maintain. python-errorhandler is a duplicate and upstream
does not support Python 3 at this time.

https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/python-errorhandler

-Aaron DeVore

Re: [aur-general] Deletion request: quark

[Lukas Jirkovsky]

On Sun, May 25, 2014 at 12:32 PM, Aaron DeVore  wrote:
> I am the maintainer of the quark package. I can't get it to compile, there
> hasn't been an additional vote in years, and no upstream activity in almost
> 4 years. Please delete.
>
> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/quark/

Removed, thank you.

Lukas

[aur-general] Deletion request: quark

[Aaron DeVore]

I am the maintainer of the quark package. I can't get it to compile, there
hasn't been an additional vote in years, and no upstream activity in almost
4 years. Please delete.

https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/quark/

Re: [aur-general] [Deletion Request] wiznote-qt5

[Evgeniy Alekseev]

On Thursday 22 May 2014 15:39:16 GSC wrote:
> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/wiznote-qt5/
> same as wiznote in [community], only newer.

Removed, thank you.
-- 
С уважением, Е.Алексеев.
Sincerely yours, E.Alekseev.

e-mail: darkarca...@mail.ru
ICQ: 407-398-235
Jabber: arca...@jabber.ru

signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

[aur-general] [Deletion Request] wiznote-qt5

[GSC]

https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/wiznote-qt5/
same as wiznote in [community], only newer.

Re: [aur-general] Deletion Request

[Felix Yan]

On Tuesday, April 29, 2014 21:04:17 Sam Hewitt wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> I have some packages that would be nice if they were deleted. Several are
> because I gave them invalid names.
> 
> Thanks
> 
> faba-icons https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/faba-icons/
>  - out-of-date & badly-named git package
> 
> faba-mono-icons https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/faba-mono-icons/
>  - out-of-date & badly-named git package
> 
> faba-symbolic-icons https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/faba-symbolic-icons/
>  - out-of-date & badly-named git package
> 
> faba-icon-theme-symbolic
> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/faba-icon-theme-symbolic/
>  - out-of-date & badly-named git package
> 
> moka-icons https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/moka-icons/
>  - out-of-date & badly-named git package
> 
> moka-gtk https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/moka-gtk/
>  - out-of-date & badly-named git package
> 
> moka-gnome-shell-theme
> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/moka-gnome-shell-theme/
>  - out-of-date & badly-named git package
> 
> faba-icon-theme-symbolic-git
> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/faba-icon-theme-symbolic-git/
>  - obsolete & deprecated; faba-icon-theme-git now contains it

All removed, thanks.

Regards,
Felix Yan

signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

[aur-general] Deletion Request

[Sam Hewitt]

Hello,

I have some packages that would be nice if they were deleted. Several are
because I gave them invalid names.

Thanks

faba-icons https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/faba-icons/
 - out-of-date & badly-named git package

faba-mono-icons https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/faba-mono-icons/
 - out-of-date & badly-named git package

faba-symbolic-icons https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/faba-symbolic-icons/
 - out-of-date & badly-named git package

faba-icon-theme-symbolic
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/faba-icon-theme-symbolic/
 - out-of-date & badly-named git package

moka-icons https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/moka-icons/
 - out-of-date & badly-named git package

moka-gtk https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/moka-gtk/
 - out-of-date & badly-named git package

moka-gnome-shell-theme
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/moka-gnome-shell-theme/
 - out-of-date & badly-named git package

faba-icon-theme-symbolic-git
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/faba-icon-theme-symbolic-git/
 - obsolete & deprecated; faba-icon-theme-git now contains it

Re: [aur-general] Deletion request: mdds

[Felix Yan]

On Sunday, April 27, 2014 19:08:08 Shohei Kusakata wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> Please delete this package: mdds
> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/mdds/
> because this package is now in the official repository
> (https://www.archlinux.org/packages/extra/any/mdds/).

Removed, thanks.

Regards,
Felix Yan

signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

[aur-general] Deletion request: mdds

[Shohei Kusakata]

Hello,

Please delete this package: mdds
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/mdds/
because this package is now in the official repository
(https://www.archlinux.org/packages/extra/any/mdds/).

Thank you.

Re: [aur-general] Deletion request

[Felix Yan]

On Wednesday, April 23, 2014 19:24:48 dmb...@gmail.com wrote:
> Please delete
> 
> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/parcman-git/
> 
> I created it while considering a name change for one of my projects, but
> opted to keep it under the name "pacrepo".

Removed, thanks.

Regards,
Felix Yan

signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

[aur-general] Deletion request

[dmbuce]

Please delete

https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/parcman-git/

I created it while considering a name change for one of my projects, but 
opted to keep it under the name "pacrepo".

Re: [aur-general] [Deletion Request] 115backup-gtk{2,3}

[David Phillips]

I was (for some reason) under the impression that AUR packages had to
be source-only with the exception of fonts, images, icons etc, but it
seems that I was wrong.

Cheers for the clarification!

On 23/04/2014, Nowaker  wrote:
>> I thought it was permissible to point to binaries just as long as you
>> don't include binaries in the tarball that's uploaded to the AUR.
>
> There is no strict rule for this - it's rather common sense. Binaries
> built by the upstream are OK (but if sources are available, then of
> course it's better to use them, but there's no obligation). Binaries
> from other sources... it depends. If you download some non-executable
> data like fonts, then it's justifiable too as long as checksums are
> provided. Executable from odd-looking sources on the internet, or
> self-compiled executables are not.
>
> 115backup-gtk2 and 115backup-gtk3 are OK - they download the sources
> directly from the upstream. Upstream doesn't provide sources. Skype
> works the same way.
>
> --
> Kind regards,
> Damian Nowak
> StratusHost
> www.AtlasHost.eu
>


-- 
David Phillips
GPG Key 0x7BF3D17D0884BF5B
Fingerprint 2426 235A 7831 AA2F 56AF  4BC0 7BF3 D17D 0884 BF5B

Re: [aur-general] [Deletion Request] 115backup-gtk{2,3}

[Nowaker]

I thought it was permissible to point to binaries just as long as you
don't include binaries in the tarball that's uploaded to the AUR.


There is no strict rule for this - it's rather common sense. Binaries 
built by the upstream are OK (but if sources are available, then of 
course it's better to use them, but there's no obligation). Binaries 
from other sources... it depends. If you download some non-executable 
data like fonts, then it's justifiable too as long as checksums are 
provided. Executable from odd-looking sources on the internet, or 
self-compiled executables are not.


115backup-gtk2 and 115backup-gtk3 are OK - they download the sources 
directly from the upstream. Upstream doesn't provide sources. Skype 
works the same way.


--
Kind regards,
Damian Nowak
StratusHost
www.AtlasHost.eu

Re: [aur-general] [Deletion Request] 115backup-gtk{2,3}

[Johannes Löthberg]

On 23/04, David Phillips wrote:

Could [1] and [2] please be removed? They aren't pointing to source
files, they're pointing to .debs which are, as far as I am aware,
binaries and not source. They were orphaned up to a month ago and
don't have any votes or comments, so don't seem to be popular anyway.


Repackaging binary packages are fine, and expected if said software 
isn't open source and they don't provide any other package.


--
Sincerely,
 Johannes Löthberg
 PGP Key ID: 3A9D0BB5


pgp4ptQWFdyIx.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Re: [aur-general] [Deletion Request] 115backup-gtk{2,3}

[Charles Bos]

I thought it was permissible to point to binaries just as long as you 
don't include binaries in the tarball that's uploaded to the AUR.


On 23/04/14 12:19, David Phillips wrote:

Could [1] and [2] please be removed? They aren't pointing to source
files, they're pointing to .debs which are, as far as I am aware,
binaries and not source. They were orphaned up to a month ago and
don't have any votes or comments, so don't seem to be popular anyway.

[1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/115backup-gtk2/
[2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/115backup-gtk3/


Cheers

[aur-general] [Deletion Request] 115backup-gtk{2,3}

[David Phillips]

Could [1] and [2] please be removed? They aren't pointing to source
files, they're pointing to .debs which are, as far as I am aware,
binaries and not source. They were orphaned up to a month ago and
don't have any votes or comments, so don't seem to be popular anyway.

[1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/115backup-gtk2/
[2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/115backup-gtk3/


Cheers
-- 
David Phillips
GPG Key 0x7BF3D17D0884BF5B
Fingerprint 2426 235A 7831 AA2F 56AF  4BC0 7BF3 D17D 0884 BF5B

Re: [aur-general] [Deletion Request] Multimon

[David Phillips]

Mutlimon was orphaned and abandoned, being superseeded by Multimon-ng
(https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/multimon-ng-git/), accoring to the
ex-comment.

On 23/04/2014, Martti Kühne  wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 23, 2014 at 4:06 AM, Felix Yan  wrote:
>> On Wednesday, April 23, 2014 13:34:59 David Phillips wrote:
>>> Please delete https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/multimon/ as it
>>> appears to have been orphaned and superseeded by another package, as
>>> noted in the comments.
>>
>
>
> That comment is gone now, too. What has become of it?
>


-- 
David Phillips
GPG Key 0x7BF3D17D0884BF5B
Fingerprint 2426 235A 7831 AA2F 56AF  4BC0 7BF3 D17D 0884 BF5B

Re: [aur-general] [Deletion Request] Multimon

[Martti Kühne]

On Wed, Apr 23, 2014 at 4:06 AM, Felix Yan  wrote:
> On Wednesday, April 23, 2014 13:34:59 David Phillips wrote:
>> Please delete https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/multimon/ as it
>> appears to have been orphaned and superseeded by another package, as
>> noted in the comments.
>


That comment is gone now, too. What has become of it?

Re: [aur-general] [Deletion Request] Multimon

[Felix Yan]

On Wednesday, April 23, 2014 13:34:59 David Phillips wrote:
> Please delete https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/multimon/ as it
> appears to have been orphaned and superseeded by another package, as
> noted in the comments.

Removed, thanks.

Regards,
Felix Yan

signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

[aur-general] [Deletion Request] Multimon

[David Phillips]

Please delete https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/multimon/ as it
appears to have been orphaned and superseeded by another package, as
noted in the comments.

Cheers

-- 
David Phillips
GPG Key 0x7BF3D17D0884BF5B
Fingerprint 2426 235A 7831 AA2F 56AF  4BC0 7BF3 D17D 0884 BF5B

Re: [aur-general] Deletion request

[Felix Yan]

On Monday, April 21, 2014 04:16:02 Hugo Osvaldo Barrera wrote:
> Please delete https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/scord/
> 
> I, the uploader and maintainer gave it the only vote i's gotten in
> almost three years, this only worked for subversion < 1.6, and is no
> longer supported upstream (meaning that it doesn't work anymore, and
> nobody even uses this package).

Removed, thanks.

Regards,
Felix Yan

signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

[aur-general] Deletion request

[Hugo Osvaldo Barrera]

Please delete https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/scord/

I, the uploader and maintainer gave it the only vote i's gotten in
almost three years, this only worked for subversion < 1.6, and is no
longer supported upstream (meaning that it doesn't work anymore, and
nobody even uses this package).

-- 
Hugo Osvaldo Barrera
A: No, it doesn't make sense.
Q: Should I include quotations *after* my reply?


pgpRXxq9y6dN_.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Re: [aur-general] Deletion request: libnemesi-git and netembryo-git

[Felix Yan]

On Tuesday, April 15, 2014 19:16:05 Thomas Glamsch wrote:
> Hi *,
> 
> 
> The packages libnemesi-git[0] and netembryo-git[1] fail to build;
> apparently the git repo is gone. Moreover, the provided project urls
> redirect to a domain parking service.
> 
> I've talked to the original maintainer, and he agreed that the packages
> should be deleted.
> 
> [0]: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/libnemesi-git
> [1]: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/netembryo-git

Both removed, thanks.

Regards,
Felix Yan

signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

[aur-general] Deletion request: libnemesi-git and netembryo-git

[Thomas Glamsch]

Hi *,


The packages libnemesi-git[0] and netembryo-git[1] fail to build;
apparently the git repo is gone. Moreover, the provided project urls
redirect to a domain parking service.

I've talked to the original maintainer, and he agreed that the packages
should be deleted.

[0]: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/libnemesi-git
[1]: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/netembryo-git


Best regards,
Thomas

Re: [aur-general] Deletion Request

[John D Jones III]

On 04/09/14 17:06, John D Jones III wrote:

Please delete:

https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/cw/

 I attempted to fix this packages, but to no avail, it does not
compile, upstream has not made a release since 2010. Also there is
concern that certain core commands, like mount for instance, break
horribly resulting in some cases in the system being unable to boot.

 There is a wiki article:
https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Color_wrapper that should also be
removed since it directly references this broken package and only this
package.


*bump*

--
Thanks,
John D Jones III
UNIX Zealot; Perl Lover
unixgeek1...@gmail.com
jnbek1...@gmail.com
http://zoelife4u.org/

Re: [aur-general] Deletion request: aqualung-alsa

[Connor Behan]

On 12/04/14 08:26 PM, Rob McCathie wrote:
> Hi TU's & list,
>
> I'm the original submitter of aqualung-alsa. Nowadays i'm the
> maintainer of aqualung and aqualung-svn too.
>
> aqualung-alsa can be deleted.
>
> For now people should be using the SVN package anyway, within which
> i've left a commented out alternate ./configure line in the PKGBUILD,
> for people who want to force only ALSA.
>
> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/aqualung-alsa/
>
> Thanks & regards,
> Rob McCathie
Deleted, thx.



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

[aur-general] Deletion request: aqualung-alsa

[Rob McCathie]

Hi TU's & list,

I'm the original submitter of aqualung-alsa. Nowadays i'm the
maintainer of aqualung and aqualung-svn too.

aqualung-alsa can be deleted.

For now people should be using the SVN package anyway, within which
i've left a commented out alternate ./configure line in the PKGBUILD,
for people who want to force only ALSA.

https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/aqualung-alsa/

Thanks & regards,
Rob McCathie

Re: [aur-general] Deletion request gnome-shell-theme-frieze

[Daniel Micay]

On 11/04/14 01:58 PM, Joost Bremmer wrote:
> I understand this is the place to go to get packages removed, in which case
> I'd like to suggest deleting gnome-shell-theme-frieze [1].
> 
> I adopted this package about a year ago but there have been no updates to
> the theme since Gnome 3.6. Since we're soon heading to 3.12 I think it's
> safe to say everyone involved has moved on to other things.
> 
> Thanks in advance,
> Joost Bremmer
> 
> [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/gnome-shell-theme-frieze/
> 
> Toost Inc.
> "We apologize for the inconvenience"

Thanks, zapped it.



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

[aur-general] Deletion request gnome-shell-theme-frieze

[Joost Bremmer]

I understand this is the place to go to get packages removed, in which case
I'd like to suggest deleting gnome-shell-theme-frieze [1].

I adopted this package about a year ago but there have been no updates to
the theme since Gnome 3.6. Since we're soon heading to 3.12 I think it's
safe to say everyone involved has moved on to other things.

Thanks in advance,
Joost Bremmer

[1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/gnome-shell-theme-frieze/

Toost Inc.
"We apologize for the inconvenience"

Re: [aur-general] Deletion request

[Felix Yan]

On Wednesday, April 09, 2014 22:38:04 Xyne wrote:
> Sorry, I accidentally deleted the fusecompress-git package while trying to
> merge the fusecompress package. I recovered the latest version from the AUR
> Git archive but it was woefully outdated so I wonder if the deleted version
> was somehow newer.

Just want to add a note here:

You can always recover the latest PKGBUILD of a deleted package at the 
PKGBUILD url (and the whole package at the tarball url). For example:

https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/fu/fusecompress-git/PKGBUILD
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/fu/fusecompress-git/fusecompress-git.tar.gz

These URL are easy to remember (add the first two letters before the $pkgname 
url part, and then PKGBUILD or $pkgname.tar.gz), and won't be purged even 
after the package itself were removed from AUR.

This would be a better way to 'recover' things than looking on the AUR git 
archive :)

Regards,
Felix Yan

signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

[aur-general] Deletion Request

[John D Jones III]

Please delete:

https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/cw/

I attempted to fix this packages, but to no avail, it does not 
compile, upstream has not made a release since 2010. Also there is 
concern that certain core commands, like mount for instance, break 
horribly resulting in some cases in the system being unable to boot.


There is a wiki article: 
https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Color_wrapper that should also be 
removed since it directly references this broken package and only this 
package.


--
Thanks,
John D Jones III
UNIX Zealot; Perl Lover
unixgeek1...@gmail.com
jnbek1...@gmail.com
http://zoelife4u.org/

Re: [aur-general] Deletion request

[G. Schlisio]

Am 10.04.2014 00:38, schrieb Xyne:
> On 2014-04-09 12:09 +0200
> G. Schlisio wrote:
> 
>> please delete [0] as it does not compile, is orphan and the project is
>> discontinued.
>> as a replacement [1] is available.
>> thanks
>>
>> [0] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/fusecompress/
>> [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/fusecompress-git/
> 
> 
> Sorry, I accidentally deleted the fusecompress-git package while trying to
> merge the fusecompress package. I recovered the latest version from the AUR 
> Git
> archive but it was woefully outdated so I wonder if the deleted version was
> somehow newer.
> 
> I have uploaded and orphaned an updated PKGBUILD to replace the deleted one.
> The build currently fails due to an allegedly missing build target ("install")
> and I unfortunately don't have the time right now to resolve it. I'm hoping
> that the previous maintainer will re-adopt the package and deal with this.
> 
> I have CC'd the maintainer listed in the archived PKGBUILD.
> 
> 7 votes were also lost. Culpa mea.
> 
> 
> The fusecompress package has been merged now.
> 
> Regards,
> Cmd. Klutz
> 
thanks. i recreated the version i uploaded earlier today…

Re: [aur-general] Deletion request

[Xyne]

On 2014-04-09 12:09 +0200
G. Schlisio wrote:

>please delete [0] as it does not compile, is orphan and the project is
>discontinued.
>as a replacement [1] is available.
>thanks
>
>[0] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/fusecompress/
>[1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/fusecompress-git/


Sorry, I accidentally deleted the fusecompress-git package while trying to
merge the fusecompress package. I recovered the latest version from the AUR Git
archive but it was woefully outdated so I wonder if the deleted version was
somehow newer.

I have uploaded and orphaned an updated PKGBUILD to replace the deleted one.
The build currently fails due to an allegedly missing build target ("install")
and I unfortunately don't have the time right now to resolve it. I'm hoping
that the previous maintainer will re-adopt the package and deal with this.

I have CC'd the maintainer listed in the archived PKGBUILD.

7 votes were also lost. Culpa mea.


The fusecompress package has been merged now.

Regards,
Cmd. Klutz

[aur-general] Deletion request

[G. Schlisio]

please delete [0] as it does not compile, is orphan and the project is
discontinued.
as a replacement [1] is available.
thanks

[0] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/fusecompress/
[1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/fusecompress-git/

Re: [aur-general] Deletion request

[Evgeniy Alekseev]

On Monday 07 April 2014 19:13:32 Daniele Formichelli wrote:
> Hi,
> I've uploaded two packages with the wrong name and now I have uploaded the
> correct ones. Please can you delete xcursors-bridge (
> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/xcursors-bridge/) and
> xcursors-perspective (
> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/xcursors-perspective/)?

Removed, thank you.
-- 
С уважением, Е.Алексеев.
Sincerely yours, E.Alekseev.

e-mail: darkarca...@mail.ru
ICQ: 407-398-235
Jabber: arca...@jabber.ru

signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

[aur-general] Deletion request

[Daniele Formichelli]

Hi,
I've uploaded two packages with the wrong name and now I have uploaded the
correct ones. Please can you delete xcursors-bridge (
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/xcursors-bridge/) and
xcursors-perspective (
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/xcursors-perspective/)?

Regards,
Daniele

Re: [aur-general] Deletion request: openspades-data

[Maxime Gauduin]

On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 1:52 PM, Shohei Kusakata  wrote:

> Hello,
>
> Please delete this package: openspades-data
> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/openspades-data/
> because I intergrated the package into openspades
> (https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/openspades/).
>
> Thank you.
>

Merged, thx.

-- 
Maxime

[aur-general] Deletion request: openspades-data

[Shohei Kusakata]

Hello,

Please delete this package: openspades-data
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/openspades-data/
because I intergrated the package into openspades
(https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/openspades/).

Thank you.

Re: [aur-general] Deletion request: arch-wiki-docs-clean

[Daniel Micay]

On 23/03/14 05:10 AM, Jakub Klinkovský wrote:
> Please delete my package arch-wiki-docs-clean [1], the official arch-wiki-docs
> in community [2] now uses the same script.
> 
> [1]: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/arch-wiki-docs-clean/
> [2]: https://www.archlinux.org/packages/community/any/arch-wiki-docs/

It's gone. Thanks!




signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

[aur-general] Deletion request: arch-wiki-docs-clean

[Jakub Klinkovský]

Please delete my package arch-wiki-docs-clean [1], the official arch-wiki-docs
in community [2] now uses the same script.

[1]: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/arch-wiki-docs-clean/
[2]: https://www.archlinux.org/packages/community/any/arch-wiki-docs/


pgptbsS7gI_J5.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Re: [aur-general] Deletion request: gst-plugins-gl-git

[Felix Yan]

On Friday, March 21, 2014 23:21:32 Lubosz Sarnecki wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> the package gst-plugins-gl-git is not needed anymore, since it was merged
> into gst-plugins-bad recently.
> I am requesting the deletion as the maintainer.
> 
> Thank you
> 
> Lubosz Sarnecki
> 
> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/gst-plugins-gl-git/

Removed, thanks.

Regards,
Felix Yan

signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

[aur-general] Deletion request: gst-plugins-gl-git

[Lubosz Sarnecki]

Hi,

the package gst-plugins-gl-git is not needed anymore, since it was merged
into gst-plugins-bad recently.
I am requesting the deletion as the maintainer.

Thank you

Lubosz Sarnecki

https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/gst-plugins-gl-git/

Re: [aur-general] Deletion request

[Evgeniy Alekseev]

On Wednesday 19 March 2014 16:55:53 G. Schlisio wrote:
> dear tus,
> please delete psi-plus-otrplugin [0], as it is outdated, does not build
> and is already included in psi-plus-plugins-git [1]
> thanks

Done, thank you.
-- 
С уважением, Е.Алексеев.
Sincerely yours, E.Alekseev.

e-mail: darkarca...@mail.ru
ICQ: 407-398-235
Jabber: arca...@jabber.ru

signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

[aur-general] Deletion request

[G. Schlisio]

dear tus,
please delete psi-plus-otrplugin [0], as it is outdated, does not build
and is already included in psi-plus-plugins-git [1]
thanks

[0] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/psi-plus-otrplugin/
[1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/psi-plus-plugins-git/

Re: [aur-general] Deletion request: openspades-data-git

[Felix Yan]

On Sunday, March 16, 2014 07:11:34 Shohei Kusakata wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> Please delete this package: openspades-data-git
> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/openspades-data-git/
> because I intergrated the package into openspades-git
> (https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/openspades-git/).
> 
> Thank you.

Removed, thanks.

Regards,
Felix Yan

signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

[aur-general] Deletion request: openspades-data-git

[Shohei Kusakata]

Hello,

Please delete this package: openspades-data-git
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/openspades-data-git/
because I intergrated the package into openspades-git
(https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/openspades-git/).

Thank you.

Re: [aur-general] Deletion request: gzip-musl-static, linux-api-headers-musl-static, tar-musl-static, xz-musl-static

[Felix Yan]

On Tuesday, March 04, 2014 07:48:57 ked wrote:
> Please delete my own packages: gzip-musl-static,
> linux-api-headers-musl-static, tar-musl-static, xz-musl-static Thanks.

All removed. Please include links to packages next time, thanks.

Regards,
Felix Yan

signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

[aur-general] Deletion request: gzip-musl-static, linux-api-headers-musl-static, tar-musl-static, xz-musl-static

[ked]

Please delete my own packages: gzip-musl-static, linux-api-headers-musl-static, 
tar-musl-static, xz-musl-static
Thanks.

Re: [aur-general] Deletion Request: antichamber-hib

[Lukas Jirkovsky]

On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 4:17 PM,   wrote:
> Hey,
>
> I'm the maintainer of the 'antichamber' package.
>
> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/antichamber/
>
> Another guy made a duplicate called 'antichamber-hib'.
>
> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/antichamber-hib/
>
> They both have the same function. I tried to talk to him, but sadly he
> didn't reply yet. Requesting deletion of 'antichamber-hib'.

Merged, thanks for putting this into attention.

[aur-general] Deletion Request: antichamber-hib

[moebius282]

Hey,

I'm the maintainer of the 'antichamber' package.

https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/antichamber/

Another guy made a duplicate called 'antichamber-hib'.

https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/antichamber-hib/

They both have the same function. I tried to talk to him, but sadly he
didn't reply yet. Requesting deletion of 'antichamber-hib'.

Re: [aur-general] deletion request: pylint-python3

[Maxime Gauduin]

On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 1:31 AM, Jeremy Audet  wrote:

> Please delete pylint-python3 [1]. It is out of date, incorrectly named and
> a duplicate of python-pylint [2].
>
> [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/pylint-python3/
> [2] https://www.archlinux.org/packages/extra/any/python-pylint/
>
> --Jeremy
>

Deleted, thx.

-- 
Maxime