Re: Support for configure.ac

2001-01-19 Thread Lars Hecking

Tom Tromey writes:
> > "Akim" == Akim Demaille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> 
> Akim> Once the `make check' finished, I'll check this in:
> 
> Did the bug affect any of the existing test cases?
> If not I generally add a new test.

 As long as the bug was there, I couldn't even get as far as running the
 test suite ;)





Re: Support for configure.ac

2001-01-19 Thread Akim Demaille

> "Tom" == Tom Tromey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> "Akim" == Akim Demaille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Akim> Once the `make check' finished, I'll check this in:

Tom> Did the bug affect any of the existing test cases?  If not I
Tom> generally add a new test.

Nope, and I was thinking about writing a test case :)  I will.




Re: Support for configure.ac

2001-01-18 Thread Tom Tromey

> "Akim" == Akim Demaille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

Akim> Once the `make check' finished, I'll check this in:

Did the bug affect any of the existing test cases?
If not I generally add a new test.

Tom




Re: Support for configure.ac

2001-01-18 Thread Lars Hecking


[...]
> Now I have it.  Sorry Lars...  The test suite did not see anything...
> I'm fixing this.

 I have added

 . 's/\@VTEXI\@/' . $vtexi . '/g;'
+. 's/\@CONFIGURE_AC\@/' . $configure_ac . '/g;'
 . 's,\@MDDIR\@,' . $conf_pat . ',g;',

 and it works now!

 Thanks Raja and Akim.





Re: Support for configure.ac

2001-01-18 Thread Akim Demaille


Once the `make check' finished, I'll check this in:

Index: ChangeLog
from  Akim Demaille  <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

* automake.in (handle_texinfo): Use &transform, and transform
CONFIGURE_AC.
Reported by Lars Hecking, and diagnosed by Raja R Harinath.

Index: automake.in
===
RCS file: /cvs/automake/automake/automake.in,v
retrieving revision 1.818
diff -u -u -r1.818 automake.in
--- automake.in 2001/01/16 13:31:54 1.818
+++ automake.in 2001/01/18 17:15:57
@@ -2276,10 +2276,11 @@
($conf_pat = $conf_dir) =~ s/(\W)/\\$1/g;
$output_rules .=
&file_contents_with_transform
-   ('s/\@TEXI\@/' . $info_cursor . '/g; '
-. 's/\@VTI\@/' . $vti . '/g; '
-. 's/\@VTEXI\@/' . $vtexi . '/g;'
-. 's,\@MDDIR\@,' . $conf_pat . ',g;',
+   (&transform ('TEXI' => $info_cursor,
+'VTI'  => $vti,
+'VTEXI'=> $vtexi,
+'MDDIR'=> $conf_pat,
+'CONFIGURE_AC' => $configure_ac),
 'texi-vers');
 
&push_phony_cleaners ($vti);
@@ -3325,7 +3326,7 @@
 }
 else
 {
-local ($xform) = &transform ("CONFIGURE_AC" => $configure_ac);
+local ($xform) = &transform ('CONFIGURE_AC' => $configure_ac);
&handle_aclocal_m4;
$output_rules .= &file_contents_with_transform ($xform,
'remake');

Lars, thanks for your perseverance, and Raja, thanks for helping me.
I think it's time I stop.

PS: After this patch:

~/src/am % touch Makefile.am nostromo 18:15
~/src/am % make  nostromo 18:15
cd . && /home/lrde/prof/akim/src/am/automake --amdir=. --gnits Makefile
cd . \
  && CONFIG_FILES=Makefile CONFIG_HEADERS= /bin/sh ./config.status
creating Makefile
Making all in .
make[1]: Entre dans le répertoire `/mnt/nostromo/home/lrde/prof/akim/src/am'
make[1]: Rien à faire pour `all-am'.
make[1]: Quitte le répertoire `/mnt/nostromo/home/lrde/prof/akim/src/am'
Making all in m4
make[1]: Entre dans le répertoire `/mnt/nostromo/home/lrde/prof/akim/src/am/m4'
make[1]: Rien à faire pour `all'.
make[1]: Quitte le répertoire `/mnt/nostromo/home/lrde/prof/akim/src/am/m4'
Making all in tests
make[1]: Entre dans le répertoire `/mnt/nostromo/home/lrde/prof/akim/src/am/tests'
make[1]: Rien à faire pour `all'.
make[1]: Quitte le répertoire `/mnt/nostromo/home/lrde/prof/akim/src/am/tests'




Re: Support for configure.ac

2001-01-18 Thread Akim Demaille


| I see this even with an installed automake.  It appears that
| 'texi-vers.am' doesn't have the CONFIGURE_AC transform before being
| inserted into Makefile.in.  From automake.in, in &handle_texinfo,
| around line 2277
| 
| $output_rules .=
| &file_contents_with_transform
| ('s/\@TEXI\@/' . $info_cursor . '/g; '
|  . 's/\@VTI\@/' . $vti . '/g; '
|  . 's/\@VTEXI\@/' . $vtexi . '/g;'
|  . 's,\@MDDIR\@,' . $conf_pat . ',g;',
|  'texi-vers');
| 
| Note the lack of the @CONFIGURE_AC@ transform.

Aaarg!  Thank you so much!

But how come I don't have this failure?

~/src/am % touch **/Makefile.am  nostromo 18:07
~/src/am % make  nostromo 18:08
cd . && /home/lrde/prof/akim/src/am/automake --amdir=. --gnits Makefile
cd . \
  && CONFIG_FILES=Makefile CONFIG_HEADERS= /bin/sh ./config.status
creating Makefile
Making all in .
make[1]: Entre dans le répertoire `/mnt/nostromo/home/lrde/prof/akim/src/am'
make[1]: *** Pas de règle pour fabriquer la cible `@CONFIGURE_AC@', nécessaire pour 
`stamp-vti'. Arrêt.
make[1]: Quitte le répertoire `/mnt/nostromo/home/lrde/prof/akim/src/am'
make: *** [all-recursive] Erreur 1

Now I have it.  Sorry Lars...  The test suite did not see anything...
I'm fixing this.




Re: Support for configure.ac

2001-01-18 Thread Lars Hecking

Akim Demaille writes:
> ~/src/am % perl --versionnostromo 17:58
> 
> This is perl, v5.6.0 built for i386-linux
[...] 
> What do you have?

 Tried both  5.005_03 and 5.6.0 built for sun4-solaris. It makes no difference.





Re: Support for configure.ac

2001-01-18 Thread Raja R Harinath

Lars Hecking <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > |  At no time an old copy of automake is run.
> > 
> > You don't seem to understand.  Make a
> > 
> > diff automake.in automake
> > 
> > and I think you'll see what I mean.
> 
> % grep @CONFIGURE_AC@ Makefile.in 
> $(srcdir)/stamp-vti: automake.texi $(top_srcdir)/@CONFIGURE_AC@
> %
> 
>  If autoconf, not automake is responsible for substituting @CONFIGURE_AC@
>  in the Makefile, then this simply doesn't work with autoconf-2.13, only
>  with autoconf-cvs.

I see this even with an installed automake.  It appears that
'texi-vers.am' doesn't have the CONFIGURE_AC transform before being
inserted into Makefile.in.  From automake.in, in &handle_texinfo,
around line 2277

$output_rules .=
&file_contents_with_transform
('s/\@TEXI\@/' . $info_cursor . '/g; '
 . 's/\@VTI\@/' . $vti . '/g; '
 . 's/\@VTEXI\@/' . $vtexi . '/g;'
 . 's,\@MDDIR\@,' . $conf_pat . ',g;',
 'texi-vers');

Note the lack of the @CONFIGURE_AC@ transform.

- Hari
-- 
Raja R Harinath -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
"When all else fails, read the instructions."  -- Cahn's Axiom
"Our policy is, when in doubt, do the right thing."   -- Roy L Ash




Re: Support for configure.ac

2001-01-18 Thread Akim Demaille

~/src/am % perl --versionnostromo 17:58

This is perl, v5.6.0 built for i386-linux

Copyright 1987-2000, Larry Wall

Perl may be copied only under the terms of either the Artistic License or the
GNU General Public License, which may be found in the Perl 5.0 source kit.

Complete documentation for Perl, including FAQ lists, should be found on
this system using `man perl' or `perldoc perl'.  If you have access to the
Internet, point your browser at http://www.perl.com/, the Perl Home Page.

What do you have?




Re: Support for configure.ac

2001-01-18 Thread Lars Hecking

Akim Demaille writes:
> > "Lars" == Lars Hecking <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> 
> Lars> I have that, but it still doesn't work. 
> 
> What did you type?  How did it fail?  Do your Makefile.in still have
> the @CONFIGURE_AC@ stuff?  If so, run `touch *.am; make'.
 
$ touch *.am
$ make
cd . && /tmp/automake/automake --amdir=. --gnits Makefile
cd . \
  && CONFIG_FILES=Makefile CONFIG_HEADERS= /bin/sh ./config.status
creating Makefile
Making all in .
make[1]: Entering directory `/tmp/automake'
make[1]: *** No rule to make target `@CONFIGURE_AC@', needed by `stamp-vti'.  Stop.
make[1]: Leaving directory `/tmp/automake'
make: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
$ grep CONFIGURE_AC automake
local ($xform) = &transform ("CONFIGURE_AC" => $configure_ac);
$xform = &transform ('CONFIGURE_AC'   => $configure_ac,

> No, @CONFIGURE_AC@ is handled by automake,

 Apparently not, at least in my case :-(

 Makefile.in from automake-cvs does not contain @CONFIGURE_AC@, but the
 one created here by automake-cvs does.





Re: Support for configure.ac

2001-01-18 Thread Akim Demaille

> "Lars" == Lars Hecking <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

Lars> I have that, but it still doesn't work. 

What did you type?  How did it fail?  Do your Makefile.in still have
the @CONFIGURE_AC@ stuff?  If so, run `touch *.am; make'.

Lars> My idea is that this new feature in automake is not compatible
Lars> with released versions of autoconf. If it were, it should show
Lars> up in config.status.

Lars> $ grep CONFIGURE_AC config.status $

No, @CONFIGURE_AC@ is handled by automake, not related to configure or
autoconf in anyway.




Re: Support for configure.ac

2001-01-18 Thread Lars Hecking


> According to the headers of your mails, somehow, automake finally got
> created (the last failure you presented was at X-From-Line:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Jan 18 13:06:26 2001).  So, if indeed you have:
 
 In all cases I posted, automake _did_ get created.

> ~/src/am % grep CONFIGURE_AC automake
> local ($xform) = &transform ("CONFIGURE_AC" => $configure_ac);
> $xform = &transform ('CONFIGURE_AC'   => $configure_ac,
> 
> then *now* `make' should work.

 I have that, but it still doesn't work. My idea is that this new feature
 in automake is not compatible with released versions of autoconf. If it
 were, it should show up in config.status.

$ grep CONFIGURE_AC config.status
$





Re: Support for configure.ac

2001-01-18 Thread Akim Demaille


$ diff -u automake.in automake
--- automake.in Wed Jan 17 06:30:29 2001
+++ automakeThu Jan 18 13:46:25 2001

According to the headers of your mails, somehow, automake finally got
created (the last failure you presented was at X-From-Line:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Jan 18 13:06:26 2001).  So, if indeed you have:

~/src/am % grep CONFIGURE_AC automake
local ($xform) = &transform ("CONFIGURE_AC" => $configure_ac);
$xform = &transform ('CONFIGURE_AC'   => $configure_ac,

then *now* `make' should work.




Re: Support for configure.ac

2001-01-18 Thread Lars Hecking


> Could you please run
> 
> diff automake.in automake
> 
> and see if it helps you understanding what I'm trying to say?  I agree
> I'm not clear, and I believe the diff will be much clearer than I am.

$ diff -u automake.in automake
--- automake.in Wed Jan 17 06:30:29 2001
+++ automakeThu Jan 18 13:46:25 2001
@@ -1,8 +1,8 @@
-#!@PERL@
+#!/bin/perl
 # -*- perl -*-
-# @configure_input@
+# Generated automatically from automake.in by configure.
 
-eval 'exec @PERL@ -S $0 ${1+"$@"}'
+eval 'exec /bin/perl -S $0 ${1+"$@"}'
 if 0;
 
 # automake - create Makefile.in from Makefile.am
@@ -30,10 +30,10 @@
 
 # Parameters set by configure.  Not to be changed.  NOTE: assign
 # VERSION as string so that eg version 0.30 will print correctly.
-$VERSION = "@VERSION@";
-$PACKAGE = "@PACKAGE@";
-$prefix = "@prefix@";
-$am_dir = "@datadir@/@PACKAGE@";
+$VERSION = "1.4c";
+$PACKAGE = "automake";
+$prefix = "/usr/local";
+$am_dir = "${prefix}/share/automake";
 
 # String constants.
 $IGNORE_PATTERN = "^##([^#].*)?\$";






Re: Support for configure.ac

2001-01-18 Thread Akim Demaille


| > |  At no time an old copy of automake is run.
| > 
| > You don't seem to understand.  Make a
| > 
| > diff automake.in automake
| > 
| > and I think you'll see what I mean.
| 
| % grep @CONFIGURE_AC@ Makefile.in 
| $(srcdir)/stamp-vti: automake.texi $(top_srcdir)/@CONFIGURE_AC@
| %
| 
|  If autoconf, not automake is responsible for substituting @CONFIGURE_AC@
|  in the Makefile, then this simply doesn't work with autoconf-2.13, only
|  with autoconf-cvs.

Could you please run

diff automake.in automake

and see if it helps you understanding what I'm trying to say?  I agree
I'm not clear, and I believe the diff will be much clearer than I am.




Re: Support for configure.ac

2001-01-18 Thread Lars Hecking


> |  At no time an old copy of automake is run.
> 
> You don't seem to understand.  Make a
> 
> diff automake.in automake
> 
> and I think you'll see what I mean.

% grep @CONFIGURE_AC@ Makefile.in 
$(srcdir)/stamp-vti: automake.texi $(top_srcdir)/@CONFIGURE_AC@
%

 If autoconf, not automake is responsible for substituting @CONFIGURE_AC@
 in the Makefile, then this simply doesn't work with autoconf-2.13, only
 with autoconf-cvs.





Re: Support for configure.ac

2001-01-18 Thread Akim Demaille


| > Yes, indeed.  But I just switched me brains on, and understood.
| > 
| > Sure you have the new .am files, but since the Makefile want to update
| > the Makefiles first, you run an old automake which does not, indeed,
| > substitute @CONFIGURE_AC@.  So find a means, but you have to `make
| > automake' before making the Makefiles.  On your system automake.in is
| > new, but not automake yet.
| 
|  At no time an old copy of automake is run.

You don't seem to understand.  Make a

diff automake.in automake

and I think you'll see what I mean.




Re: Support for configure.ac

2001-01-18 Thread Lars Hecking


> Yes, indeed.  But I just switched me brains on, and understood.
> 
> Sure you have the new .am files, but since the Makefile want to update
> the Makefiles first, you run an old automake which does not, indeed,
> substitute @CONFIGURE_AC@.  So find a means, but you have to `make
> automake' before making the Makefiles.  On your system automake.in is
> new, but not automake yet.

 At no time an old copy of automake is run.

$ pwd
/tmp/automake
$ ./configure
[...]
$ make automake
cd . && /tmp/automake/aclocal --acdir=m4
cd . && /tmp/automake/automake --amdir=. --gnits Makefile
^^
cd . && /bin/sh /tmp/automake/missing --run autoconf
[...]
$ make dist
make: *** No rule to make target `@CONFIGURE_AC@', needed by `stamp-vti'.  Stop.
$





Re: Support for configure.ac

2001-01-18 Thread Akim Demaille

> "Lars" == Lars Hecking <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

Lars>  Undoubtedly, automake-cvs running on its own files should
Lars> produce something useful, shouldn't it?

Yes, indeed.  But I just switched me brains on, and understood.

Sure you have the new .am files, but since the Makefile want to update
the Makefiles first, you run an old automake which does not, indeed,
substitute @CONFIGURE_AC@.  So find a means, but you have to `make
automake' before making the Makefiles.  On your system automake.in is
new, but not automake yet.




Re: Support for configure.ac

2001-01-18 Thread Lars Hecking


> But your output, compared to mine, contains:
> 
> $ make dist
> cd . && /tmp/automake/aclocal --acdir=m4
> cd . && /tmp/automake/automake --amdir=. --gnits Makefile
> cd . && /bin/sh /tmp/automake/missing --run autoconf
> 
> i.e., your files are not up to date.  Try from a freshly checked out
> automake?

 I was using yesterday's cvs HEAD. Maybe cvs messed up the timestamps?

 Undoubtedly, automake-cvs running on its own files should produce
 something useful, shouldn't it?





Re: Support for configure.ac

2001-01-18 Thread Akim Demaille

> "Lars" == Lars Hecking <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

Lars>  I posted everything I did. I did not install automake, only ran
Lars> configure and make dist straight from a copy of my checked-out
Lars> tree.

Well, I don't know.

~/src/am % ./configure
loading cache ./config.cache
checking for a BSD compatible install... (cached) /usr/bin/install -c
checking whether build environment is sane... yes
checking for gawk... (cached) mawk
checking whether make sets ${MAKE}... (cached) yes
checking for perl... (cached) /usr/bin/perl
creating ./config.status
creating Makefile
creating automake
creating aclocal
creating m4/Makefile
creating tests/Makefile
~/src/am % make dist nostromo 10:40
chmod -R a+w automake-1.4c > /dev/null 2>&1; rm -rf automake-1.4c
mkdir automake-1.4c
for subdir in . m4 tests; do \
  if test "$subdir" = .; then :; else \
test -d automake-1.4c/$subdir \
|| mkdir automake-1.4c/$subdir \
|| exit 1; \
(cd $subdir && make  top_distdir=../automake-1.4c distdir=../automake-1.4c/$subdir 
distdir) \
  || exit 1; \
  fi; \
done
make[1]: Entre dans le répertoire `/mnt/nostromo/home/lrde/prof/akim/src/am/m4'
make[1]: Quitte le répertoire `/mnt/nostromo/home/lrde/prof/akim/src/am/m4'
make[1]: Entre dans le répertoire `/mnt/nostromo/home/lrde/prof/akim/src/am/tests'
make[1]: Quitte le répertoire `/mnt/nostromo/home/lrde/prof/akim/src/am/tests'
make  top_distdir="automake-1.4c" distdir="automake-1.4c" dist-info
make[1]: Entre dans le répertoire `/mnt/nostromo/home/lrde/prof/akim/src/am'
list='automake.info'; \
for base in $list; do \
  d=.; \
  for file in `CDPATH=: && cd $d && eval echo $base*`; do \
test -f automake-1.4c/$file \
|| cp -p $d/$file automake-1.4c/$file; \
  done; \
done
make[1]: Quitte le répertoire `/mnt/nostromo/home/lrde/prof/akim/src/am'
find automake-1.4c -type d ! -perm -777 -exec chmod a+rwx {} \; -o \
  ! -type d ! -perm -444 -links 1 -exec chmod a+r {} \; -o \
  ! -type d ! -perm -400 -exec chmod a+r {} \; -o \
  ! -type d ! -perm -444 -exec /bin/sh ./install-sh -c -m a+r {} {} \; \
|| chmod -R a+r automake-1.4c
/bin/sh /home/lrde/prof/akim/src/am/missing --run tar chof - automake-1.4c | 
GZIP=--best gzip -c > automake-1.4c.tar.gz
chmod -R a+w automake-1.4c > /dev/null 2>&1; rm -rf automake-1.4c


But your output, compared to mine, contains:

$ make dist
cd . && /tmp/automake/aclocal --acdir=m4
cd . && /tmp/automake/automake --amdir=. --gnits Makefile
cd . && /bin/sh /tmp/automake/missing --run autoconf

i.e., your files are not up to date.  Try from a freshly checked out
automake?




Re: Support for configure.ac

2001-01-17 Thread Lars Hecking


> Did you install completely automake?  I don't see that problem showing
> up.  Could you deonstrate the failure in a few steps?  Did the test suite
> run OK?

 I posted everything I did. I did not install automake, only ran configure
 and make dist straight from a copy of my checked-out tree.





Re: Support for configure.ac

2001-01-17 Thread akim

On Wed, Jan 17, 2001 at 06:09:34PM +, Lars Hecking wrote:
> Akim Demaille writes:
> > Will be applied within a couple of minutes.
> 
>  I don't think this is working as intended.
> 
>  cvs automake as of now. autoconf 2.13.
> 
> $ ./configure
> creating cache ./config.cache
> checking for a BSD compatible install... /usr/local/gnu/bin/install -c
> checking whether build environment is sane... yes
> checking for gawk... gawk
> checking whether make sets ${MAKE}... yes
> checking for perl... /bin/perl
> updating cache ./config.cache
> creating ./config.status
> creating Makefile
> creating automake
> creating aclocal
> creating m4/Makefile
> creating tests/Makefile
> $ make dist
> cd . && /tmp/automake/aclocal --acdir=m4
> cd . && /tmp/automake/automake --amdir=. --gnits Makefile
> cd . && /bin/sh /tmp/automake/missing --run autoconf
> /bin/sh ./config.status --recheck
> running /bin/sh ./configure  --no-create --no-recursion
> loading cache ./config.cache
> checking for a BSD compatible install... (cached) /usr/local/gnu/bin/install -c
> checking whether build environment is sane... yes
> checking for mawk... (cached) gawk
> checking whether make sets ${MAKE}... (cached) yes
> checking for perl... (cached) /bin/perl
> creating ./config.status
> cd . \
>   && CONFIG_FILES=Makefile CONFIG_HEADERS= /bin/sh ./config.status
> creating Makefile
> make: *** No rule to make target `@CONFIGURE_AC@', needed by `stamp-vti'.  Stop.
> $

Did you install completely automake?  I don't see that problem showing
up.  Could you deonstrate the failure in a few steps?  Did the test suite
run OK?




Re: Support for configure.ac

2001-01-17 Thread Lars Hecking

Akim Demaille writes:
> Will be applied within a couple of minutes.

 I don't think this is working as intended.

 cvs automake as of now. autoconf 2.13.

$ ./configure
creating cache ./config.cache
checking for a BSD compatible install... /usr/local/gnu/bin/install -c
checking whether build environment is sane... yes
checking for gawk... gawk
checking whether make sets ${MAKE}... yes
checking for perl... /bin/perl
updating cache ./config.cache
creating ./config.status
creating Makefile
creating automake
creating aclocal
creating m4/Makefile
creating tests/Makefile
$ make dist
cd . && /tmp/automake/aclocal --acdir=m4
cd . && /tmp/automake/automake --amdir=. --gnits Makefile
cd . && /bin/sh /tmp/automake/missing --run autoconf
/bin/sh ./config.status --recheck
running /bin/sh ./configure  --no-create --no-recursion
loading cache ./config.cache
checking for a BSD compatible install... (cached) /usr/local/gnu/bin/install -c
checking whether build environment is sane... yes
checking for mawk... (cached) gawk
checking whether make sets ${MAKE}... (cached) yes
checking for perl... (cached) /bin/perl
creating ./config.status
cd . \
  && CONFIG_FILES=Makefile CONFIG_HEADERS= /bin/sh ./config.status
creating Makefile
make: *** No rule to make target `@CONFIGURE_AC@', needed by `stamp-vti'.  Stop.
$





Re: Support for configure.ac

2001-01-16 Thread Akim Demaille

Will be applied within a couple of minutes.




Re: Support for configure.ac

2001-01-14 Thread Akim Demaille

If there are no objections, I'll apply this guy on Tuesday.