[Axapta-Knowledge-Village] Re: BOM Process Based Manufacturing
I'm very confident Product Builder could provide an elegant solution for your problem. It's essence is a Sales Line BOM, configured to order. License costs and learning curve would have to be considered, though. --- In Axapta-Knowledge- [EMAIL PROTECTED], abdulbasith_mohammad [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Thanx for your reply Nigel, But Nigel we have about 2000 shades for an item, using BOM configuration groups will create a huge BOM, assuming one shade has about 8 components...do you think this optin is still goes, or is there anything much better...or u think product builder has a sure solution for this kind of issue!! Take care Abdul --- In Axapta-Knowledge-Village@yahoogroups.com, nigel_cox2003 nigelcox@ wrote: Also, take a look at Configurable BOMS. These are activated by the Configurable flag on the Item Master. This has nothing to do with Product Builder. It would mean reflecting your Color within the Config instead of the Color, but understand that there is no way to tie a BOM to a parent's size or color. You CAN tie it to a Config by have one master/superBOM for the item and then dynamically tying BOMlines toConfig via Configuration Groups. You MIGHT end up with just one Configuration Group (say, Shade). Your Cadillac solution might be to use Product Builder, where you could ask for Shade and mathematically derive a BOM, each time that paint is ordered. --- In Axapta-Knowledge-Village@yahoogroups.com, Craig Fidler cfidler@ wrote: Use the IBI process manufacturing module. From: Axapta-Knowledge-Village@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of abdulbasith_mohammad Sent: Monday, November 26, 2007 1:55 PM To: Axapta-Knowledge-Village@yahoogroups.com Subject: [Axapta-Knowledge-Village] BOM Process Based Manufacturing Hi, We are working on a proeject whose manufacturing is Process based (Paint Industry). The customer has single Item Number for one product for example: Royal Acrylic and he has more than 2000 shades for it, every shade having a differnt BOM. Can anyone one suggest what is the best way to go about this situation for creating a BOM and Item Numer. For example, can I use configuration 'color' and for each color create a BOM? are there any other ways of doing it. Cheers Abdul [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
[Axapta-Knowledge-Village] Re: BOM Process Based Manufacturing
Also, take a look at Configurable BOMS. These are activated by the Configurable flag on the Item Master. This has nothing to do with Product Builder. It would mean reflecting your Color within the Config instead of the Color, but understand that there is no way to tie a BOM to a parent's size or color. You CAN tie it to a Config by have one master/superBOM for the item and then dynamically tying BOMlines toConfig via Configuration Groups. You MIGHT end up with just one Configuration Group (say, Shade). Your Cadillac solution might be to use Product Builder, where you could ask for Shade and mathematically derive a BOM, each time that paint is ordered. --- In Axapta-Knowledge-Village@yahoogroups.com, Craig Fidler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Use the IBI process manufacturing module. From: Axapta-Knowledge-Village@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of abdulbasith_mohammad Sent: Monday, November 26, 2007 1:55 PM To: Axapta-Knowledge-Village@yahoogroups.com Subject: [Axapta-Knowledge-Village] BOM Process Based Manufacturing Hi, We are working on a proeject whose manufacturing is Process based (Paint Industry). The customer has single Item Number for one product for example: Royal Acrylic and he has more than 2000 shades for it, every shade having a differnt BOM. Can anyone one suggest what is the best way to go about this situation for creating a BOM and Item Numer. For example, can I use configuration 'color' and for each color create a BOM? are there any other ways of doing it. Cheers Abdul [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
[Axapta-Knowledge-Village] Re: Excel templates for Uploading opening Stock
Forgive me, madhubabu_r, if it's just a typo on your part, but you list InventJournalTable and InventTrans as the tables you uploaded. Shouldn't this be InventJournalTable and InventJournalTrans as Sumit Loya listed? --- In Axapta-Knowledge-Village@yahoogroups.com, Sumit Loya [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Madhu, Am not exactly sure why this error is coming. The best way to load opening balances is thru Movement journal only. I wud not guess the reason for this error as this error information is not descriptive enough.. u can try and to debug and see from where this error is coming and on what condition. Do let me know if u come to know anything on this front. One more thing if you are posting Movement journal then u need to have data in InventJournalTable (Movement journal header) and InventJournalTrans (Movement journal line). You need not create records in InventSum. It will be taken care while posting the Movement journal also enure that the Inventory dimensions id that u will provide in InventJournalTrans exists before you post the records. Regards, Sumit On 9/26/07, madhubabu_r [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Sumit, Finally shud i take the following tables in the excel templates: InventJournalTable InventTrans InventSum??? The tables I have uploaded are InventJournalTransa and InventTrans. I have managed all the number sequences in excel template itself. I could upload the data into the Movement Journal Lines. Movement Journal was also posted. I could see the onhand stock. But when I was trying to create a Sales order/Purchase Order /any inventory journals - just after entering the item and i click save I am getting an error message - Illegal Reference and I cannot proceed further. Any answers for this?? Regards, Madhu --- In Axapta-Knowledge-Village@yahoogroups.comAxapta-Knowledge- Village%40yahoogroups.com, Sumit Loya loya.sumit@ wrote: Hi, I wudnt say only InventJournalTrans and InventDim.. All item transactions are also mirrored in InventTrans table and also the on-hand (stock detalis) are stored in InventSum table (Onhand table). Regards, Sumit On 9/25/07, madhubabu_r madhubabu_r@ wrote: Hi friends, Manually entering opening stock in Movement Journal must be the most laborious job with all those Excise related entries also included. In my current project there are about 1 items as opening stock. I would like to know which tables I have to consider for excel upload of these opening entries. Awaiting your valuable responses friends. Thanks and best regards, Madhu Babu Rapolu [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
[Axapta-Knowledge-Village] Re: Product Builder
Yes, you should use Validation. In this case a Constraint Rule. Your condition will be to constrain (i.e. exclude) as follows (Lampshade = Textile) and ( (ShadeColor = Blue) or (ShadeColor = Green) ) Sometimes this seems to eliminate Blue and Green from the drop down and sometimes it shows them but gives an error when you select Textile. Maybe it depends on the sequence the user does things? You may want to upgrade to sp2 soon. There were many things improved in sp2. --- In Axapta-Knowledge-Village@yahoogroups.com, mohammed idais [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: hi nitesh ranjain to solve your issue you should used to Validation at variable ,when choose textlite show the colors blue and green . writhe the conditions in the validation . best regards Mohammad Idais Nitesh Ranjan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: For this you need to create PBA Variable for second field and use first variable to create Query for second variable. Hope this idea will work! Craig Fidler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi All, I need a helping hand with regards to Product Builder. I am running Ax4 Sp1,. How do I restrict a user to a selection of records based in a prior selection. E.g. I choose a textile lamp shade the I can only choose red blue or green for the colours. Regards, Craig [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] - Yahoo! oneSearch: Finally, mobile search that gives answers, not web links. [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] - Luggage? GPS? Comic books? Check out fitting gifts for grads at Yahoo! Search. [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
[Axapta-Knowledge-Village] I would argue that AX is QUITE capable of separate MPS from MRP
While I agree with Anders that one pass through planning works as he describes, I would have to argue that AX MPS is quite capabale of a separate MPS and MRP (and the designers may well have planned it that way). The subtle trick here is that use AX MPS for both MPS and MRP. You can have multiple plan names, some driven by forecast, some not. Each can be filtered on it's target items. The critical thing to keep in mind is that you need to review and firm the MPS orders BEFORE running MRP (but that's classic MPS/MRP logic anyway). Remember that when you firm the MPS you need to be judicious. If you hold safety stock anywhere, you should probably hold it here. Now USE that safety stock. ONLY mess with MPS orders within a horizon if you need to for actual customer demand, or to cope with particular capacity/material shortage constraints. Otherwise permit the plan to dig into or add surplus safety stock (temporarily). Why? To keep MRP demand stable, which is the REASON for separate MPS and MRP. Once the MPS orders (typically Production, but maybe Transfer or Purchase) are firmed, run the MRP MPS. This targets (and is filtered on) all items BELOW the MPS items. Even though the MPS items are not in this plan, their component deman for lower items IS. You can be less judicious with the MRP planned orders, looking for errors/oddities/supply exceptions only. The idea is to spend planning resources (people) solving problems on the few (MPS) items rater than the many (MRP) items. While this might be overkill, the elegance of the way AX MPS is designed is that you are not limited to two levels. You could have any number. And YOU get to decide which level you want to treat as the MPS level (classic APICS suggests their should only be one MPS level as the control or choke point). This is important because not all businesses are make to stock. Consider configure to order or raw material conversion businesses . . .
[Axapta-Knowledge-Village] Re: Is there seperate MPS and MRP Planning
roadsidetree is absolutely right. AX's ability to store plan rules and run them at will automatically permits traditional, decoupled MPS and MRP. The primary reason people had for this two-level planning was to remove nervousness. The idea is that you pick your MPS level at the choke-point. For make to stock or make to order this is Finished Goods. For configure to order it's likely at the subassembly level. For raw materials processing (stuff out of the ground) and engineer to order it might be at the raw material level. At this level you DON'T MESS WITH THE PLAN unless you have to. So you run planning here first (on MPS items only) and only reschedule orders or firm up planned orders BY EXCEPTION (any change within a certain window should be considered a failure). This makes what you're saying to the shopfloor more stable and consistent. Probably this is the key level you hold safety stock, so some flexing is fine. Above the MPS (if MPS isn't already Finished Goods) should be pure make-to-order and ideally, you don't plan at all (use bom line type Production. Below MPS run planning on everything else (other than simple min-max items) and largely firm up all planned orders without too much review (analyze exceptions and capacity issues, of course). Forecasts should ideally be architected to be at the same level as the MPS, but you may have to get tricky if MPS isn't Finished Goods, using devices like Planning BOMs. Of course, if you REALLY serious about running a competitive manufacturing operation, start on the Lean journey and, ultimately, only use planning for financial decisions. --- In Axapta-Knowledge-Village@yahoogroups.com, road side tree [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello, the way i see it, in other systems, MPS is for planning of primary items, usually finished goods, sometimes could be intermediate items at bottleneck or most expensive process. there is usually a flag in item master to identify these items, during MPS run, the system planned for these items, planner than work on the generated plan to balance capacity loading and demand. once the MPS plans is ok, they are firmed and then MRP is to based on the MPS to explode down to the lower level items. In Dynamics-Ax, i think we can do the same by running master planning by selecting MPS items, then we work on and firm these MPS plans, then we run MRP. To identify MPS or MRP, we can use the coverage group field or any of the fields in items master to serve the purpose. regards www.prorsus.com --- In Axapta-Knowledge-Village@yahoogroups.com, Vijay Bhankur axaptavijay@ wrote: Hi Friends, In Microsoft Dynanics-AX, is there seperate MPS and MRP running? What I find is one can run for Forecast scheduling and then Master Scheduling. Thans in advance. Vijat - Did you know? You can CHAT without downloading messenger. Click here [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
[Axapta-Knowledge-Village] Re: Product Builder Question
I can confirm that for a Sales Order line (including one in the Quotation state) Dynamics AX (sp3 and 4 and likely earlier releases) automatically persists the dialog answers (i.e. values of Model Variables) as long as the user has SUCCESSFULLY clicked OK at least once on the dialog box. Certain system errors (I don't have documented which ones) will obstruct saving the dialog state, but once corrections are made to fix these, the state saves. Simply exiting the dialog box and clicking Configure Line at a later time shows answers as they were left last time. Errors trapped by the engineer within model tree will not obstruct saving dialog state. Additional Notes and Tips: (1) Tip: On a related note, after the user clicks OK, the dialog will stop processing the product model tree rules at the first thrown error. We have a policy of including a XYZDebug boolean variable named Model Done (XYZ indication a client site) in every product model. If XYZDebug is switched OFF (by the user un-checking the box labelled Model Done all error messages are directed to Warnings instead of errors and a final error User de-selected MOdel Done is thrown. This has two benefits: a) ALL tree-sensed errors are caught and listed as Warnings, not just the first one b) No Routings or BOMs are created until the user selects Model Done Consequently the user can check all answers will be valid to the model tree without any system overhead (of creating unwanted BOMS/Routings/Notes). Once they are happy with all answers they check Model Done. Now clicking OK will fully configure the line. (2) Note: Be aware that once the user has clicked OK and then clicked OK, again, to confirm, Product Builder will create a BOM (or BOMS for parent-child models) and routing(s). When the user re- configures the BOM/Routings will be deleted and recreated. However if Generate Items was switched on the old generated item(s) are NOT deleted. They will remain with empty BOMs and Routings. In other words, new items will be created every time the user re-configures Sales Order lines for model enabled items that generate items. (3) Also be aware that once a Production Order for the Sales Order Line has been taken to at least Estimated state, anyone attempting to re-configure a Sales Order Line will find all their answers grayed out and unchangeable. The Production Order should be reset to Created and deleted first, if reconfiguration is needed Hope this helps . . . --- In Axapta-Knowledge-Village@yahoogroups.com, Hemant Kumthekar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, I think when you create a Sales Quote the Configuration can be saved and amended later(PB config is saved). Normally in ETO business you would like to start with configuration and save it , so the Product Builder model you build should be having a Item Number Generate rule where by you can track by Sales Quote Item Number generated during the Product Builder Q A. Let me know if you have any doubts. Hemant stanfvaninger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Our company is just in the process of setting up, populating tables, and doing training on Axapta. It will be several months before we go live.The two consultants that are working with us do not have very much knowledge of the Axapta Products Builder. We are a manufacturing company and would like to use the Product Builder to do estimates and quotes on new products. An important requirement is that we be able to save the results of a user session of the Product Builder to a table so that it can be edited in the future. Our estimaters have to gather a lot of data and frequently begin working on an estimate before all the data has been accumulated. They need the ability to save a user session and return to it at any time to enter additional data and/or edit existing information. They will normally not need to generate the BOM and Route until all the data has been entered and verified. I anticipate that they will need the ability to copy an existing configuration to a new configuration and then make some changes to the new configuration in order that the costs of the two can be compared. I am not talking about the product models; I understand that these are permanently saved (until they are deliberately deleted). What we will need is the ability to keep the results of running the configuration user dialog for one of the products models and be able to edit the data previously entered. Is this possible with the Axapta Product Builder? Thanks very much in advance. Sharing the knowledge on Axapta. Visit www.frappr.com/axapta for axapta friends. SPONSORED LINKS Business finance course Business to business finance Small business finance Business finance consultant Business finance magazine Business finance schools - YAHOO!
[Axapta-Knowledge-Village] Report As Finished when Average Costing
We are backflushing materials at Report as Finished. Documentation seems to indicate that Report As Finished should post Average Costs of materials Consumed and Average Cost of Parent finished (i.e. Average Cost of Materials plus Backflushed Labor times rates) to the best of its ability (prior to a close and adjust). We are observing the Parent being transacted at its Item Master's Cost Price, however, until the Production Order is Costed. We have Latest cost price unchecked for the parent (and components). Include physical value, post physical inventory, post financial inventory, revenue are all checked for all items' Inventory model groups. Post physical revenue and post phgysical purchase are unchecked. ALL statii in Production Setup are checked. Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-- Help tsunami villages rebuild at GlobalGiving. The real work starts now. http://us.click.yahoo.com/T42rFC/KbOLAA/cosFAA/kGEolB/TM ~- Sharing the knowledge on Axapta. Yahoo! Groups Links * To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Axapta-Knowledge-Village/ * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
[Axapta-Knowledge-Village] Document Handling of BOM/Route Notes
We are successfully attaching (simple) notes to BOM Lines and Routing steps. It SEEMS like these notes are NOT carried across to Production Orders. Is that as-designed or are we missing something in Setup? We have Document Handling set up such that we CAN MANUALLY add Notes to Production BomLines and Production Routing Steps. Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-- Help tsunami villages rebuild at GlobalGiving. The real work starts now. http://us.click.yahoo.com/T42rFC/KbOLAA/cosFAA/kGEolB/TM ~- Sharing the knowledge on Axapta. Yahoo! Groups Links * To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Axapta-Knowledge-Village/ * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
[Axapta-Knowledge-Village] Can't complete a BOM Journal
We are having difficulty getting BOM Journal to work. It seems to require a Lot Id. We want to simply deduct materials from inventory and receive a parent id. Entering a new Lot Id doesn't help. Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-- Help tsunami villages rebuild at GlobalGiving. The real work starts now. http://us.click.yahoo.com/T42rFC/KbOLAA/cosFAA/kGEolB/TM ~- Sharing the knowledge on Axapta. Yahoo! Groups Links * To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Axapta-Knowledge-Village/ * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
[Axapta-Knowledge-Village] manually scheduling jobs within a Production Order
Is there any way to set up Axapta such that one operation can be rescheduled without Axapta automatically rescheduling all other operations on the same Production Order? It seems that Axapta wants to keep the Operations linked even if we want to do an operation early and have it sit, scheduling subsequent operations after a planned delay. Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-- Put more honey in your pocket. (money matters made easy). http://us.click.yahoo.com/F9LvrA/dlQLAA/cosFAA/kGEolB/TM ~- Sharing the knowledge on Axapta. Yahoo! Groups Links * To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Axapta-Knowledge-Village/ * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
Re: YNT: [Axapta-Knowledge-Village] 64 KB error on product builder (compiler error.)
Hi Gokhan, I really appreciate your willingness to take time to discuss this. I entered a Support request and was very happy that Microsoft sent us an xpo (probably derived from some of your activity) to fix this. In the fix documentation, they revealed that Axapta compiles each tree node, and that the 64k limit applies to eaqch compiled node. In addition they noted that each node was assuming the ENTIRE variable map as declared for that node. This makes SOME sense, as it would be prohibitive to ask the Engineer to declare a subset of variables on each and every node! I'm assuming that the xpo the provided ensures that only the variables referenced within the node are declared for that node's compilation. Indeed, compilation was noticably faster after applying the xpo. We ARE using parent child models (rather extensively). Indeed we routinely call the same BOM Node repeatedly within a FOR loop as many as 50 times! Every Child Variable modelled in our parent has a corresponding Array variable (one array and one not). The model that previously errored had over a hundred such variable pairs. The specific node that broke 64k was a Code node that assigned about 30 child variables from the current row of their associated array variable, just before calling the BOM Node. Indeed, splitting that code node into two was our successful temporary fix to the problem. Now, the fix Microsoft sent seems to have a problem, and I have submitted another support request to Microsoft to Fix the Fix. While each of our Models seems to compile successfully, we get Error infologs reporting that SOME OTHER UNRELATED PRODUCT MODEL already exists. The pattern seems to be that after successful compilation of any Model, say MODEL A, the next Model we compile, say Model B, will return several error rows saying Invalid name: The Class PBAExecutable_10_ModelA already exists. But Model B shows successful compilation. Recompiling Model B a second time returns no errors, but now the next model returns errors saying Model B already exists. We tried several things, including deleting all our PBAExecutable Classes in the Usr layer, playing with 2-tier and 3-tier and even deleting all our Models and starting new ones, all to no avail. My apologies if this is a somewhat larger response than you were counting on, but thanks for your interest and any insights would be most welcome. --- In Axapta-Knowledge-Village@yahoogroups.com, nigel_cox2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Gokhan! We are very close to go live and hit this same problem with 289 Model Variables (we do have the Parameters Compile as X++ check box checked). By breaking a large Code node into two I was able to compile again, but it's only a matter of time before we hit the limit again (we only have half our variables loaded). Is there any chance you could provide a contact name at Microsoft for the fix you mention? This could be a life saver for us here in Phoenix, Arizona, USA . . . --- In Axapta-Knowledge-Village@yahoogroups.com, Gokhan Can [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Gloria; We had same kind of situation but or product model is very big like 600 variables on the same model so the code , BOM and if nodes gave error for 64 KB error .But I am not sure that your situation is this big. ,I f you did not check the compile as X++ classes under Product Builder - Parameters form just check it.But although you checked it and yoru product model is big as ours microsoft send as a special fix so our problem just solved. You need to clerify the problem first Gökhan CAN Software Engineer / Mic. Cert. Axapta Professional ( Pro - PB ) Datasistem Genel Otomasyon San Tic. Þti Tel : ( 232 ) 463 1663 - 131 e-mail : [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Kimden: Axapta-Knowledge-Village@yahoogroups.com bu kiþinin yerine: Gloria Sun Gönderilmiþ: Per 07.07.2005 11:01 Kime: Axapta-Knowledge-Village@yahoogroups.com Konu: [Axapta-Knowledge-Village] 64 KB error on product builder (compiler error.) Hi all, I have some problems with product builder. It gives me a compiler error because of the size of the model. I found an e-mail on knowledge but found no answer for that question. Is there any solution for this problem? Or what can be done? Thanks and regards, Gloria - -- - From: Cenk Ince [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, March 01, 2005 4:23 PM To: Axapta-Knowledge-Village@yahoogroups.com Subject: [Axapta-Knowledge-Village] 64 KB error on product builder (compiler error.) Hi all; When i test a node on Product builder, it tries to compile an object but can't because the size of object is mode than 64 KB. How can i set limit to 128 KB or something different. If i
Re: YNT: [Axapta-Knowledge-Village] 64 KB error on product builder (compiler error.)
Hi Gokhan! We are very close to go live and hit this same problem with 289 Model Variables (we do have the Parameters Compile as X++ check box checked). By breaking a large Code node into two I was able to compile again, but it's only a matter of time before we hit the limit again (we only have half our variables loaded). Is there any chance you could provide a contact name at Microsoft for the fix you mention? This could be a life saver for us here in Phoenix, Arizona, USA . . . --- In Axapta-Knowledge-Village@yahoogroups.com, Gokhan Can [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Gloria; We had same kind of situation but or product model is very big like 600 variables on the same model so the code , BOM and if nodes gave error for 64 KB error .But I am not sure that your situation is this big. ,I f you did not check the compile as X++ classes under Product Builder - Parameters form just check it.But although you checked it and yoru product model is big as ours microsoft send as a special fix so our problem just solved. You need to clerify the problem first Gökhan CAN Software Engineer / Mic. Cert. Axapta Professional ( Pro - PB ) Datasistem Genel Otomasyon San Tic. Þti Tel : ( 232 ) 463 1663 - 131 e-mail : [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Kimden: Axapta-Knowledge-Village@yahoogroups.com bu kiþinin yerine: Gloria Sun Gönderilmiþ: Per 07.07.2005 11:01 Kime: Axapta-Knowledge-Village@yahoogroups.com Konu: [Axapta-Knowledge-Village] 64 KB error on product builder (compiler error.) Hi all, I have some problems with product builder. It gives me a compiler error because of the size of the model. I found an e-mail on knowledge but found no answer for that question. Is there any solution for this problem? Or what can be done? Thanks and regards, Gloria --- - From: Cenk Ince [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, March 01, 2005 4:23 PM To: Axapta-Knowledge-Village@yahoogroups.com Subject: [Axapta-Knowledge-Village] 64 KB error on product builder (compiler error.) Hi all; When i test a node on Product builder, it tries to compile an object but can't because the size of object is mode than 64 KB. How can i set limit to 128 KB or something different. If i can't do it how can i solve this problem Thanks. Compile error: *** Error: 15, The internal object code must not exceed 64K. From: Cenk Ince [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, March 01, 2005 4:23 PM To: Axapta-Knowledge-Village@yahoogroups.com Subject: [Axapta-Knowledge-Village] 64 KB error on product builder (compiler error.) Hi all; When i test a node on Product builder, it tries to compile an object but can't because the size of object is mode than 64 KB. How can i set limit to 128 KB or something different. If i can't do it how can i solve this problem Thanks. Compile error: *** Error: 15, The internal object code must not exceed 64K. Yahoo! Mail for Mobile Take Yahoo! Mail with you! http://us.rd.yahoo.com/evt=31132/*http://mobile.yahoo.com/learn/mail Check email on your mobile phone. Sharing the knowledge on Axapta. YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS * Visit your group Axapta-Knowledge-Village http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Axapta-Knowledge-Village on the web. * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] subject=Unsubscribe * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ . Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-- Get fast access to your favorite Yahoo! Groups. Make Yahoo! your home page http://us.click.yahoo.com/dpRU5A/wUILAA/yQLSAA/kGEolB/TM ~- Sharing the knowledge on Axapta. Yahoo! Groups Links * To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Axapta-Knowledge-Village/ * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
