Re: [Fwd: Re: Apache 2.0 vs Apache 1.3]
I also think that it would be better to support only for Apache 2. Regds Rangika On Thu, 2005-05-05 at 16:25 +, Samisa Abeysinghe wrote: Would appreciate thoughts on this. Please see the mail tail below. Thanks, Samisa... -Forwarded Message- From: John Hawkins [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Apache AXIS C Developers List axis-c-dev@ws.apache.org Subject: Re: Apache 2.0 vs Apache 1.3 Date: Thu, 05 May 2005 11:17:27 +0100 I've been thinking this too - we should go to the user list first. Samisa Abeysinghe [EMAIL PROTECTED] 05/05/2005 16:30 Please respond to Apache AXIS C Developers List To Apache AXIS C Developers List axis-c-dev@ws.apache.org cc Subject Apache 2.0 vs Apache 1.3 Hi all, I have noticed widespread use of Apache 2.0 and the number of queries we are getting on Apache 1.3 is near 0. Given this, would it be a bad idea to support only Apache 2 on server side? This will simplify the docs as well. Thoughts please. Thanks, Samisa...
RE: [Fwd: Re: Apache 2.0 vs Apache 1.3]
I've lots of users who still use Apache 1.3, though personally I use 2.0. It isn't just a question of the systems we developers use: we have in turn to support users hosting our developed services who are running pretty unsophisticated systems. Given that it works nicely now and is not too hard for people without much technical background to set up, I'd be sorry if you were to drop it. -Original Message- From: Samisa Abeysinghe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 05 May 2005 17:26 To: axis-c-user@ws.apache.org Subject: [Fwd: Re: Apache 2.0 vs Apache 1.3] Would appreciate thoughts on this. Please see the mail tail below. Thanks, Samisa... -Forwarded Message- From: John Hawkins [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Apache AXIS C Developers List axis-c-dev@ws.apache.org Subject: Re: Apache 2.0 vs Apache 1.3 Date: Thu, 05 May 2005 11:17:27 +0100 I've been thinking this too - we should go to the user list first. Samisa Abeysinghe [EMAIL PROTECTED] 05/05/2005 16:30 Please respond to Apache AXIS C Developers List To Apache AXIS C Developers List axis-c-dev@ws.apache.org cc Subject Apache 2.0 vs Apache 1.3 Hi all, I have noticed widespread use of Apache 2.0 and the number of queries we are getting on Apache 1.3 is near 0. Given this, would it be a bad idea to support only Apache 2 on server side? This will simplify the docs as well. Thoughts please. Thanks, Samisa... -- Samisa Abeysinghe [EMAIL PROTECTED] Virtusa Corporation
RE: [Fwd: Re: Apache 2.0 vs Apache 1.3]
Good day all, Right now I am using Apache 1.3, because when I started to read documentation and user postings, I got the sense that Axis is more stable with Apache 1.3. I'd like to see the support for that version of Apache stay for now, unless I am wrong about the stability issue. Thanks, Srdjan Pejic Software Development Intern Environment Canada Phone: (416) 739-5740 E-Mail: Srdjan.Pejic AT ec.gc.ca -Original Message- From: Samisa Abeysinghe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, May 05, 2005 16:26 To: axis-c-user@ws.apache.org Subject: [Fwd: Re: Apache 2.0 vs Apache 1.3] Would appreciate thoughts on this. Please see the mail tail below. Thanks, Samisa... -Forwarded Message- From: John Hawkins [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Apache AXIS C Developers List axis-c-dev@ws.apache.org Subject: Re: Apache 2.0 vs Apache 1.3 Date: Thu, 05 May 2005 11:17:27 +0100 I've been thinking this too - we should go to the user list first. Samisa Abeysinghe [EMAIL PROTECTED] 05/05/2005 16:30 Please respond to Apache AXIS C Developers List To Apache AXIS C Developers List axis-c-dev@ws.apache.org cc Subject Apache 2.0 vs Apache 1.3 Hi all, I have noticed widespread use of Apache 2.0 and the number of queries we are getting on Apache 1.3 is near 0. Given this, would it be a bad idea to support only Apache 2 on server side? This will simplify the docs as well. Thoughts please. Thanks, Samisa... -- Samisa Abeysinghe [EMAIL PROTECTED] Virtusa Corporation
