RE: Apache 2.0 vs Apache 1.3
OK, Looks like the responses are more biased towards keeping both. One of the main reasons that I raised this was to cut down on maintenance efforts, not only the code, but also the docs. In some situations, such as in case of supporting attachments Rangika seem to have to update both modules. Anyway, if it is being used, we have to keep supporting Apache 1.3 despite these concerns. Thanks, Samisa... -Original Message- From: sanjaya gayan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, May 06, 2005 9:58 AM To: Apache AXIS C Developers List Subject: Re: Apache 2.0 vs Apache 1.3 Me too. The 1.3 family has been well tested very stable and widely accepted. Also we have had problems with Apache 2.0 (even without axis) on windows and 1.3 never troubled us. +1 to have both. sanjaya. - Original Message - From: "Sanjiva Weerawarana" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Apache AXIS C Developers List" Sent: Friday, May 06, 2005 6:20 AM Subject: RE: Apache 2.0 vs Apache 1.3 > I have to vehemently agree .. there are many who are using 1.3 and > dropping 1.3 will cut out a significant part of the customer base! > > Sanjiva. > > On Thu, 2005-05-05 at 13:06 -0600, Lilantha Darshana wrote: > > My -1 for dropping 1.3 support. > > > > I strongly believe, there are so many instances out there who still > > depends on 1.3 server > > and in need for web services to support their legacy services. > > > > thanks > > -Lilantha > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Samisa Abeysinghe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Thursday, May 05, 2005 11:31 AM > > To: Apache AXIS C Developers List > > Subject: Apache 2.0 vs Apache 1.3 > > > > Hi all, > > > > I have noticed widespread use of Apache 2.0 and the number of queries we > > are getting on Apache 1.3 is near 0. > > Given this, would it be a bad idea to support only Apache 2 on server > > side? > > This will simplify the docs as well. > > > > Thoughts please. > > > > Thanks, > > Samisa... > > > > > > > > > > ___ > > Siebel > > IT'S ALL ABOUT THE CUSTOMER > > Visit www.siebel.com > > > > This e-mail message is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and contains confidential and/or privileged information belonging to Siebel Systems, Inc. or its customers or partners. Any unauthorized review, use, copying, disclosure or distribution of this message is strictly prohibited. If you are not an intended recipient of this message, please contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all soft and hard copies of the message and any attachments. Thank you for your cooperation. > > > > > > > > ___ Yahoo! Messenger - want a free and easy way to contact your friends online? http://uk.messenger.yahoo.com
RE: [Fwd: Re: Apache 2.0 vs Apache 1.3]
Good day all, Right now I am using Apache 1.3, because when I started to read documentation and user postings, I got the sense that Axis is more stable with Apache 1.3. I'd like to see the support for that version of Apache stay for now, unless I am wrong about the stability issue. Thanks, Srdjan Pejic Software Development Intern Environment Canada Phone: (416) 739-5740 E-Mail: Srdjan.Pejic AT ec.gc.ca -Original Message- From: Samisa Abeysinghe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, May 05, 2005 16:26 To: axis-c-user@ws.apache.org Subject: [Fwd: Re: Apache 2.0 vs Apache 1.3] Would appreciate thoughts on this. Please see the mail tail below. Thanks, Samisa... -Forwarded Message- From: John Hawkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Apache AXIS C Developers List Subject: Re: Apache 2.0 vs Apache 1.3 Date: Thu, 05 May 2005 11:17:27 +0100 I've been thinking this too - we should go to the user list first. Samisa Abeysinghe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 05/05/2005 16:30 Please respond to "Apache AXIS C Developers List" To Apache AXIS C Developers List cc Subject Apache 2.0 vs Apache 1.3 Hi all, I have noticed widespread use of Apache 2.0 and the number of queries we are getting on Apache 1.3 is near 0. Given this, would it be a bad idea to support only Apache 2 on server side? This will simplify the docs as well. Thoughts please. Thanks, Samisa... -- Samisa Abeysinghe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Virtusa Corporation
RE: [Fwd: Re: Apache 2.0 vs Apache 1.3]
I've lots of users who still use Apache 1.3, though personally I use 2.0. It isn't just a question of the systems we developers use: we have in turn to support users hosting our developed services who are running pretty unsophisticated systems. Given that it works nicely now and is not too hard for people without much technical background to set up, I'd be sorry if you were to drop it. >-Original Message- >From: Samisa Abeysinghe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >Sent: 05 May 2005 17:26 >To: axis-c-user@ws.apache.org >Subject: [Fwd: Re: Apache 2.0 vs Apache 1.3] > >Would appreciate thoughts on this. > >Please see the mail tail below. > >Thanks, >Samisa... > >-Forwarded Message- >From: John Hawkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >To: Apache AXIS C Developers List >Subject: Re: Apache 2.0 vs Apache 1.3 >Date: Thu, 05 May 2005 11:17:27 +0100 > > >I've been thinking this too - we should go to the user list first. > > > > >Samisa Abeysinghe ><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >05/05/2005 16:30 > Please respond to > "Apache AXIS C Developers List" >To >Apache AXIS C >Developers List > >cc > > Subject >Apache 2.0 vs >Apache 1.3 > > > > >Hi all, > >I have noticed widespread use of Apache 2.0 and the number of >queries we are getting on Apache 1.3 is near 0. >Given this, would it be a bad idea to support only Apache 2 on >server side? >This will simplify the docs as well. > >Thoughts please. > >Thanks, >Samisa... >-- >Samisa Abeysinghe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Virtusa Corporation >
Re: [Fwd: Re: Apache 2.0 vs Apache 1.3]
I also think that it would be better to support only for Apache 2. Regds Rangika On Thu, 2005-05-05 at 16:25 +, Samisa Abeysinghe wrote: > Would appreciate thoughts on this. > > Please see the mail tail below. > > Thanks, > Samisa... > > -Forwarded Message- > From: John Hawkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: Apache AXIS C Developers List > Subject: Re: Apache 2.0 vs Apache 1.3 > Date: Thu, 05 May 2005 11:17:27 +0100 > > > I've been thinking this too - we should go to the user list first. > > > > > Samisa Abeysinghe > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > 05/05/2005 16:30 > Please respond to > "Apache AXIS C Developers List" > To > Apache AXIS C > Developers List > > cc > >Subject > Apache 2.0 vs > Apache 1.3 > > > > > Hi all, > > I have noticed widespread use of Apache 2.0 and the number of queries we > are getting on Apache 1.3 is near 0. > Given this, would it be a bad idea to support only Apache 2 on server > side? > This will simplify the docs as well. > > Thoughts please. > > Thanks, > Samisa...
[Fwd: Re: Apache 2.0 vs Apache 1.3]
Would appreciate thoughts on this. Please see the mail tail below. Thanks, Samisa... -Forwarded Message- From: John Hawkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Apache AXIS C Developers List Subject: Re: Apache 2.0 vs Apache 1.3 Date: Thu, 05 May 2005 11:17:27 +0100 I've been thinking this too - we should go to the user list first. Samisa Abeysinghe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 05/05/2005 16:30 Please respond to "Apache AXIS C Developers List" To Apache AXIS C Developers List cc Subject Apache 2.0 vs Apache 1.3 Hi all, I have noticed widespread use of Apache 2.0 and the number of queries we are getting on Apache 1.3 is near 0. Given this, would it be a bad idea to support only Apache 2 on server side? This will simplify the docs as well. Thoughts please. Thanks, Samisa... -- Samisa Abeysinghe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Virtusa Corporation
