attn dims please : RE: Axis 1.1 vs Axis 1.2rc3 and derived types

2005-05-02 Thread Dovholuk, Clint
dims,

It seems that this issue doesn't relate only to derived types, but to
the beanMapping as supplied by the server-config.wsdd...

In axis 1.1, axis would write out all the objects mapped in the
server-config.wsdd... for instance, if you had this in your
server-config.wsdd:


  
  
  
  


the output wsdl would write a type for both the Test1 and Test2
objects...

in Axis 1.2rc3, this is no longer true.  Is this expected behavior?

Thanks,
-Clint




-Original Message-
From: Dovholuk, Clint [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, April 26, 2005 4:22 PM
To: axis-user@ws.apache.org
Subject: RE: Axis 1.1 vs Axis 1.2rc3 and derived types

thanks dims,

bug 1955 created : http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AXIS-1955

-clint

(posted to the mailing list in case anyone else wants to view)



-Original Message-
From: Davanum Srinivas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, April 26, 2005 3:26 PM
To: axis-user@ws.apache.org
Subject: Re: Axis 1.1 vs Axis 1.2rc3 and derived types

this is definitely looks like a bug. do you have a stripped down test
case that can be used to recreate the bug? (please open a bug report)

thanks,
dims

On 4/26/05, Dovholuk, Clint <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello all,
> 
> We are trying to switch to Axis 1.2rc3 in order to move to J2SE 5.0 
> (unless there's another workaround for the package "enum" that I 
> didn't find?).
> 
> I have a web service which uses abstract classes/types but when I 
> switched to the axis 1.2rc3 jars, all of a sudden the wsdl that axis 
> creates is no longer representing many (mostly all) of the derived 
> classes... The abstract classes are still created but the classes 
> derived from the abstract class no longer get written to the wsdl...
> 
> If I expose another method to axis (via server-config.wsdd) in the 
> same class which uses the base type, only THEN will the derived types 
> get written to the wsdl properly...
> 
> I've searched through the mailing lists to the best of my ability but 
> I can't find this exact issue. Could anybody point me in the right 
> direction or has anybody seen similar issues?
> 
> I can provide some simple sample classes if people wish but every time

> I post a 'lengthy' message, I get no replies... :)
> 
> Thanks,
> -Clint
> 


--
Davanum Srinivas - http://webservices.apache.org/~dims/


RE: Axis 1.1 vs Axis 1.2rc3 and derived types

2005-04-26 Thread Dovholuk, Clint
thanks dims,

bug 1955 created : http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AXIS-1955

-clint

(posted to the mailing list in case anyone else wants to view)



-Original Message-
From: Davanum Srinivas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, April 26, 2005 3:26 PM
To: axis-user@ws.apache.org
Subject: Re: Axis 1.1 vs Axis 1.2rc3 and derived types

this is definitely looks like a bug. do you have a stripped down test
case that can be used to recreate the bug? (please open a bug report)

thanks,
dims

On 4/26/05, Dovholuk, Clint <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello all,
> 
> We are trying to switch to Axis 1.2rc3 in order to move to J2SE 5.0 
> (unless there's another workaround for the package "enum" that I 
> didn't find?).
> 
> I have a web service which uses abstract classes/types but when I 
> switched to the axis 1.2rc3 jars, all of a sudden the wsdl that axis 
> creates is no longer representing many (mostly all) of the derived 
> classes... The abstract classes are still created but the classes 
> derived from the abstract class no longer get written to the wsdl...
> 
> If I expose another method to axis (via server-config.wsdd) in the 
> same class which uses the base type, only THEN will the derived types 
> get written to the wsdl properly...
> 
> I've searched through the mailing lists to the best of my ability but 
> I can't find this exact issue. Could anybody point me in the right 
> direction or has anybody seen similar issues?
> 
> I can provide some simple sample classes if people wish but every time

> I post a 'lengthy' message, I get no replies... :)
> 
> Thanks,
> -Clint
> 


--
Davanum Srinivas - http://webservices.apache.org/~dims/


Re: Axis 1.1 vs Axis 1.2rc3 and derived types

2005-04-26 Thread Davanum Srinivas
this is definitely looks like a bug. do you have a stripped down test
case that can be used to recreate the bug? (please open a bug report)

thanks,
dims

On 4/26/05, Dovholuk, Clint <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello all,
> 
> We are trying to switch to Axis 1.2rc3 in order to move to J2SE 5.0
> (unless there's another workaround for the package "enum" that I didn't
> find?).
> 
> I have a web service which uses abstract classes/types but when I
> switched to the axis 1.2rc3 jars, all of a sudden the wsdl that axis
> creates is no longer representing many (mostly all) of the derived
> classes... The abstract classes are still created but the classes
> derived from the abstract class no longer get written to the wsdl...
> 
> If I expose another method to axis (via server-config.wsdd) in the same
> class which uses the base type, only THEN will the derived types get
> written to the wsdl properly...
> 
> I've searched through the mailing lists to the best of my ability but I
> can't find this exact issue. Could anybody point me in the right
> direction or has anybody seen similar issues?
> 
> I can provide some simple sample classes if people wish but every time I
> post a 'lengthy' message, I get no replies... :)
> 
> Thanks,
> -Clint
> 


-- 
Davanum Srinivas - http://webservices.apache.org/~dims/