RE: [backstage] SVG used by Office of National Statistics in BBC business report

2007-01-17 Thread Jason Cartwright
** This is all my personal opinion **

I think its worth noting that I have nothing against SVG... what I do
have a problem with is zealotry in the face of real-world, practical
content consumption. If the BBC released something as unsupported and
unusable as this ONS app we would have users complaining in their droves
- costing a fortune.

 People have had a few years to try the SVG plugins, or install a more
competent browser. 

People expect to be able to be able to access content without installing
a new browser or plugin. With SVG a very large proportion of people
can't do this.

 yet you want to block my use of the site with Flash because you're
lazy?

Catering for over 95% of users vs well under 20% of users is deemed
lazy... then yes I am lazy. I did suggest building several versions for
people that don't have the ability to run Flash... so that pretty much
100% of users could access it.

 Flash (v7?) didn't come with Windows, *you* had to install it for some
reason or other. What's the difference to this?

Wrong. Flash v6 (which this app it appears is easily achievable in) is
bundled with Windows XP. Various Flash players are bundled with IE, FF
and Opera releases. I'm on a managed desktop (along with whole swathes
of the corporate world) - it's installed and updated automatically.

 Your in a minority - one that would have got the fall-back version if

 it had been developed differently. 
 I am. But why should I be a second class citizen?

Why should I when my corporate-controlled desktop won't allow me to
install an unsigned app? Flash, Javascript and a server-side apps would
all work perfectly.

I'm suggesting a solution where the app would roll back just for people
who can't get the plugin - less than 5% if Flash was used?

The SVG viewer suggested by ONS is 2.3mb!

 Standards exist so everyone can enjoy things, a concept a few
companies don't understand.

Huh? Nobody is arguing against standards. Its just that this one
seemingly isn't finished, the plugins aren't finished and it doesn't
work to a standard where it could be used by home users.

 Server-side processing requires being online

It also requires no javascript or any plugins whatsoever. I can't
imagine that hardly anyone realises that the ONS app can be run offline.

J

-
Sent via the backstage.bbc.co.uk discussion group.  To unsubscribe, please 
visit http://backstage.bbc.co.uk/archives/2005/01/mailing_list.html.  
Unofficial list archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/backstage@lists.bbc.co.uk/


Re: [backstage] SVG used by Office of National Statistics in BBC business report

2007-01-17 Thread Nic James Ferrier
Jason Cartwright [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

 Catering for over 95% of users vs well under 20% of users is deemed
 lazy... then yes I am lazy. I did suggest building several versions for
 people that don't have the ability to run Flash... so that pretty much
 100% of users could access it.

I don't agree with your argument. There are good reasons NOT to do
this. 95% of users could be said to use Windows... which would be an
argument for only testing on IE, if something breaks there you can't
possibly do it, right?

Whether you agree or not that MS has a monopoly (and the courts say
that they do) this behaviour would certainly create a monopolist.

Back in the days before flash was nearlly everywhere people still used
it - pushing the envelope of what the web could do. SVG is just doing
the same.

Better plugins would be good... other routes to SVG implementation
would be good (how about something that transforms to flash?) but
I don't agree in not doing it even if 95% have to get a plugin to use
it.


Another point about SVG, if I may, is that it can be processed away
from the browser. Maybe people can do mashups with the raw SVG. They
couldn't do that with Flash.

-- 
Nic Ferrier
http://www.tapsellferrier.co.uk   for all your tapsell ferrier needs
-
Sent via the backstage.bbc.co.uk discussion group.  To unsubscribe, please 
visit http://backstage.bbc.co.uk/archives/2005/01/mailing_list.html.  
Unofficial list archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/backstage@lists.bbc.co.uk/


RE: [backstage] Joost anyone?

2007-01-17 Thread Brian Butterworth
Mario,
 
I would be very pleased to accept your token. 
 
Thanks in advance.
 
Brian Butterworth
HYPERLINK http://www.ukfree.tv/www.ukfree.tv
 


   _  

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mario Menti
Sent: 17 January 2007 06:52
To: backstage@lists.bbc.co.uk
Subject: Re: [backstage] Joost anyone?


On 1/16/07, Brian Butterworth HYPERLINK
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED][EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: 


I'm not after a review, I wish to use it!  The message I got when I signed
up was to ask someone else 'who has a token' to provide me with one.

And if you don't ask you don't get.


Brian Butterworth
HYPERLINK http://www.ukfree.tvwww.ukfree.tv



Brian - let me know if you have received an invite off-list. If not, I can
send you one. (Before anyone else asks, I only have this one spare token at
the moment, but more may be forthcoming in future...) 

Mario.




--
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.5.432 / Virus Database: 268.16.13/632 - Release Date: 16/01/2007
16:36



-- 
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.5.432 / Virus Database: 268.16.13/632 - Release Date: 16/01/2007
16:36
 


Re: [backstage] Movies Data

2007-01-17 Thread Matt Chadburn
 This looks really useful.  One thing i've noticed is the film details
 don't have a link to the BBC Page, so there is no way of linking back to
 you easily. 

Good point. The copies you see are the inputs to the Movies production
system from which the URL's are later derived.

 Are we allowed to link directly to the Movies Cinema search page from
 any pages created using these feeds?

Yup, you can do.

Alternatively, the production cycle dictates the reviews will appear in a
dated archive the next Friday after the date under in the datereviewed
node, eg.

 if date review is 1st Jan 2007, the review will be added to ...

 - http://www.bbc.co.uk/films/gateways/release/review/cinema/20070105.shtml

Or, the datereviewed node + the XML file name + .shtml will also give you
the URL of the HTML review.

 if review is 1st Jan 2007, the XML document miss_potter_2006_review.xml

 - http://www.bbc.co.uk/films/2007/01/01/miss_potter_2006_review.shtml

Neither solution is ideal, sorry, but I hope that helps find your way
around.

M


On 16/1/07 20:13, Adam Leach [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Hi,
 
 This looks really useful.  One thing i've noticed is the film details
 don't have a link to the BBC Page, so there is no way of linking back to
 you easily. 
 
 Are we allowed to link directly to the Movies Cinema search page from
 any pages created using these feeds?
 
 Adam
 
 Matt Chadburn wrote:
 Hi,
 
 Due in part to the new BBC Movies Interactive TV service that launched today
 we've had the opportunity to tidy up and document the output of a few
 systems that create the bbc.co.uk/movies site ...
 
  - http://www.bbc.co.uk/movies/syndication/1/docs/
 
 The service includes a few handy RSS feeds ...
  
  * Weekly Cinema Reviews - Films out in UK cinemas this week.
 * Coming Soon - Films out in UK cinemas in the next few weeks.
 * Further Ahead - Approximate release dates for Films out in the next year
 
 Along with various parts of the site in various flavours of XML ...
  
 * Film Reviews - Official BBC Movies review. Contains cast, crew etc.
 * User Rating - Star based user ratings.
 * User Comments - User submitted mini-reviews and opinions.
 * What's On - Films showing on the BBC this week
 
 Would love to hear from anyone with interesting ideas on what they might do
 with the information or any pointers on improvements we might make.
 
 And for Red Button (DSat, Freeview, DCable) fans ...
 
 With BBC Movies, you can watch video interviews, reviews, special features
 and trailers. Plus, you can access cinema listings for your area, win
 prizes, add your own reviews, and generally keep up to date on all things
 movies. - http://www.bbc.co.uk/films/bbci/
 
 Thanks,
 Matt - Interactive Drama  Entertainment
 
 
 
 -
 Sent via the backstage.bbc.co.uk discussion group.  To unsubscribe, please
 visit http://backstage.bbc.co.uk/archives/2005/01/mailing_list.html.
 Unofficial list archive:
 http://www.mail-archive.com/backstage@lists.bbc.co.uk/
 
   
 
 -
 Sent via the backstage.bbc.co.uk discussion group.  To unsubscribe, please
 visit http://backstage.bbc.co.uk/archives/2005/01/mailing_list.html.
 Unofficial list archive:
 http://www.mail-archive.com/backstage@lists.bbc.co.uk/

-
Sent via the backstage.bbc.co.uk discussion group.  To unsubscribe, please 
visit http://backstage.bbc.co.uk/archives/2005/01/mailing_list.html.  
Unofficial list archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/backstage@lists.bbc.co.uk/


RE: [backstage] SVG used by Office of National Statistics in BBC business report

2007-01-17 Thread Jason Cartwright
** This is all my personal opinion **

I'm not for or against publishing in any particular format - like
everyone else I just want it to work.

My problem was with this idea that SVG was good enough (what is 'good
enough' is subjective) for this task, and should receive praise for
being used. It blatently isn't 'good enough' for the vast majority of
the audience, as the user experience is dreadful. Flash, whilst much
better, isn't 'good enough' either, and that should have a fallback
option (a couple were suggested).

There is nothing stopping them publishing the data used out as CSVs,
XML, ABC, XYZ, whatever, of course - and that is something that
statistics.gov.uk does all the time.

The BBC guidelines (to compare) on this plugin issue are pretty clear:

SVG isn't to be used (without a business case to gain an exception), and
For core content presented using a plugin, you MUST provide alternative
content
http://www.bbc.co.uk/guidelines/newmedia/desed/multimedia_plugins_flash.
shtml

J

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Nic James Ferrier
Sent: 17 January 2007 10:21
To: backstage@lists.bbc.co.uk
Subject: Re: [backstage] SVG used by Office of National Statistics in
BBC business report

Jason Cartwright [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

 Catering for over 95% of users vs well under 20% of users is deemed 
 lazy... then yes I am lazy. I did suggest building several versions 
 for people that don't have the ability to run Flash... so that pretty 
 much 100% of users could access it.

I don't agree with your argument. There are good reasons NOT to do this.
95% of users could be said to use Windows... which would be an argument
for only testing on IE, if something breaks there you can't possibly do
it, right?

Whether you agree or not that MS has a monopoly (and the courts say that
they do) this behaviour would certainly create a monopolist.

Back in the days before flash was nearlly everywhere people still used
it - pushing the envelope of what the web could do. SVG is just doing
the same.

Better plugins would be good... other routes to SVG implementation would
be good (how about something that transforms to flash?) but I don't
agree in not doing it even if 95% have to get a plugin to use it.


Another point about SVG, if I may, is that it can be processed away from
the browser. Maybe people can do mashups with the raw SVG. They couldn't
do that with Flash.

--
Nic Ferrier
http://www.tapsellferrier.co.uk   for all your tapsell ferrier needs
-
Sent via the backstage.bbc.co.uk discussion group.  To unsubscribe,
please visit
http://backstage.bbc.co.uk/archives/2005/01/mailing_list.html.
Unofficial list archive:
http://www.mail-archive.com/backstage@lists.bbc.co.uk/

-
Sent via the backstage.bbc.co.uk discussion group.  To unsubscribe, please 
visit http://backstage.bbc.co.uk/archives/2005/01/mailing_list.html.  
Unofficial list archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/backstage@lists.bbc.co.uk/


Re: [backstage] Movies Data

2007-01-17 Thread Kirk Northrop

Matt Chadburn wrote:

Would love to hear from anyone with interesting ideas on what they might do
with the information or any pointers on improvements we might make.


I presume the data on showing times at each cinema is provided by and 
therefore under the licence of the PA?


--
From the North, this is Kirk
-
Sent via the backstage.bbc.co.uk discussion group.  To unsubscribe, please 
visit http://backstage.bbc.co.uk/archives/2005/01/mailing_list.html.  
Unofficial list archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/backstage@lists.bbc.co.uk/


Re: [backstage] Joost anyone?

2007-01-17 Thread John

Any idea how i can get one of those?

Already registered on the beta-testers list,

Appreciate it,


John.

On 1/17/07, Brian Butterworth [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


 Mario,

I would be very pleased to accept your token.

Thanks in advance.

Brian Butterworth
www.ukfree.tv


 --
*From:* [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] *On Behalf Of *Mario Menti
*Sent:* 17 January 2007 06:52
*To:* backstage@lists.bbc.co.uk
*Subject:* Re: [backstage] Joost anyone?

On 1/16/07, Brian Butterworth [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 I'm not after a review, I wish to use it!  The message I got when I
 signed
 up was to ask someone else 'who has a token' to provide me with one.

 And if you don't ask you don't get.


 Brian Butterworth
 www.ukfree.tv



Brian - let me know if you have received an invite off-list. If not, I can
send you one. (Before anyone else asks, I only have this one spare token at
the moment, but more may be forthcoming in future...)

Mario.


--
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.5.432 / Virus Database: 268.16.13/632 - Release Date:
16/01/2007 16:36


--
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.5.432 / Virus Database: 268.16.13/632 - Release Date:
16/01/2007 16:36





--
John Griffiths
http://www.red91.com


Re: [backstage] Movies Data

2007-01-17 Thread Matt Chadburn
 Matt Chadburn wrote:
 Would love to hear from anyone with interesting ideas on what they might do
 with the information or any pointers on improvements we might make.
 
 I presume the data on showing times at each cinema is provided by and
 therefore under the licence of the PA?

Maybe. i'll look in to the contract details, which might take a few days to
track down someone who knows the answer.

M

-
Sent via the backstage.bbc.co.uk discussion group.  To unsubscribe, please 
visit http://backstage.bbc.co.uk/archives/2005/01/mailing_list.html.  
Unofficial list archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/backstage@lists.bbc.co.uk/


RE: [backstage] Joost anyone?

2007-01-17 Thread Ian Forrester
I would have built up a lot more invites myself, except there's little to watch 
on Venice sorry Joost besides Poker.
 
My general thoughts about Joost is that its technology is very good and 
impressive. But the content really sucks. If only they could index some of the 
video podcasts or something
 
Cheers,

Ian Forrester || backstage.bbc.co.uk || cubicgarden.com || geekdinner.co.uk 

 




From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Brian 
Butterworth
Sent: 17 January 2007 11:36
To: backstage@lists.bbc.co.uk
Subject: RE: [backstage] Joost anyone?


Mario,
 
I would be very pleased to accept your token. 
 
Thanks in advance.
 
Brian Butterworth
www.ukfree.tv http://www.ukfree.tv/ 
 




From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of 
Mario Menti
Sent: 17 January 2007 06:52
To: backstage@lists.bbc.co.uk
Subject: Re: [backstage] Joost anyone?


On 1/16/07, Brian Butterworth [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: 


I'm not after a review, I wish to use it!  The message 
I got when I signed
up was to ask someone else 'who has a token' to provide 
me with one.

And if you don't ask you don't get.


Brian Butterworth
www.ukfree.tv



Brian - let me know if you have received an invite off-list. If 
not, I can send you one. (Before anyone else asks, I only have this one spare 
token at the moment, but more may be forthcoming in future...) 

Mario.




--
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.5.432 / Virus Database: 268.16.13/632 - Release 
Date: 16/01/2007 16:36



--
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.5.432 / Virus Database: 268.16.13/632 - Release Date: 
16/01/2007 16:36




Re: [backstage] Joost anyone?

2007-01-17 Thread Robert Kerry

My general thoughts about Joost is that its technology is very good and
impressive. But the content really sucks. If only they could index some of
the video podcasts or something


The current content is simply for BETA testing, its current userbase
is more interested in finding bugs or which features are lacking. I've
heard whispers of deals being made with News International (FOX etc)
as well as other major film distributors and US networks. If the
encryption is sound and the audience base open to adverts in exchange
for free content, there's no reason for this platform not to become an
alternative to Sky or Cable. If I can watch 24, Scrubs, Family Guy and
Spooks (come on BBC) on-demand via my laptop - I'll chuck my plasma TV
in the skip. :o)

Oh, and did anyone else hear the rumour that Coca Cola's Head of
Marketing was involved in the project or will be shortly?


Rob
-
Sent via the backstage.bbc.co.uk discussion group.  To unsubscribe, please 
visit http://backstage.bbc.co.uk/archives/2005/01/mailing_list.html.  
Unofficial list archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/backstage@lists.bbc.co.uk/


Re: [backstage] Joost anyone?

2007-01-17 Thread Robert Kerry

Email me if you'd like an invite - not sure how many I can give out though.

:o)


Rob
evilgreenmonkey



On 17/01/07, John [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

Any idea how i can get one of those?

Already registered on the beta-testers list,

Appreciate it,


John.

On 1/17/07, Brian Butterworth [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


 Mario,

 I would be very pleased to accept your token.

 Thanks in advance.

 Brian Butterworth
 www.ukfree.tv



 
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mario Menti
 Sent: 17 January 2007 06:52
 To: backstage@lists.bbc.co.uk
 Subject: Re: [backstage] Joost anyone?


 On 1/16/07, Brian Butterworth [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

  I'm not after a review, I wish to use it!  The message I got when I
signed
  up was to ask someone else 'who has a token' to provide me with one.
 
  And if you don't ask you don't get.
 
 
  Brian Butterworth
  www.ukfree.tv



 Brian - let me know if you have received an invite off-list. If not, I can
send you one. (Before anyone else asks, I only have this one spare token at
the moment, but more may be forthcoming in future...)

 Mario.




 --
 No virus found in this incoming message.
 Checked by AVG Free Edition.
 Version: 7.5.432 / Virus Database: 268.16.13/632 - Release Date:
16/01/2007 16:36



 --
 No virus found in this outgoing message.
 Checked by AVG Free Edition.
 Version: 7.5.432 / Virus Database: 268.16.13/632 - Release Date:
16/01/2007 16:36




--
John Griffiths
http://www.red91.com

-
Sent via the backstage.bbc.co.uk discussion group.  To unsubscribe, please 
visit http://backstage.bbc.co.uk/archives/2005/01/mailing_list.html.  
Unofficial list archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/backstage@lists.bbc.co.uk/


Re: [backstage] Movies Data

2007-01-17 Thread Mark Birbeck

Matt,

It's great to see all of this data being made available.

In terms of suggestions for the future, the first I would suggest is
that some unique identifier needs to be given to a film. It could just
be the IMDB URL or something like that, but once you have this, then
when one of the films that has just been released eventually finds its
way into the RSS feed for 'films on TV', we can then match it with the
original review. I don't know if you've ever noticed, but in Time Out,
for example, a film has a 'review', and that review is used not just
when the film has just been released, but is also used if the film
appears on TV years later, is released on DVD, appears in a film
festival...it's even used in their annual printed film encyclopedia.
The same could be done here, provided it's always possible to get back
from the film to a review.

Also, you could say that the information about the film, such as
actors and directors, doesn't belong in the review, but in some entry
for the film itself. Taking this approach would give even more
flexibility. For example, if the data for the film was one thing and
the review another, there would be no reason why the feed couldn't
have multiple reviews of the same film. At the moment Mark Kermode's
review of The Last King of Scotland is currently available as a
podcast on the BBC site, and a link to that in the same feed would be
excellent! (There is an RSS feed that contains a reference to this
podcast, but as far as I can tell, it has no relationship to the feeds
just announced.)

Regards,

Mark

On 16/01/07, Matt Chadburn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

Hi,

Due in part to the new BBC Movies Interactive TV service that launched today
we've had the opportunity to tidy up and document the output of a few
systems that create the bbc.co.uk/movies site ...

 - http://www.bbc.co.uk/movies/syndication/1/docs/

The service includes a few handy RSS feeds ...

 * Weekly Cinema Reviews - Films out in UK cinemas this week.
* Coming Soon - Films out in UK cinemas in the next few weeks.
* Further Ahead - Approximate release dates for Films out in the next year

Along with various parts of the site in various flavours of XML ...

* Film Reviews - Official BBC Movies review. Contains cast, crew etc.
* User Rating - Star based user ratings.
* User Comments - User submitted mini-reviews and opinions.
* What's On - Films showing on the BBC this week

Would love to hear from anyone with interesting ideas on what they might do
with the information or any pointers on improvements we might make.

And for Red Button (DSat, Freeview, DCable) fans ...

With BBC Movies, you can watch video interviews, reviews, special features
and trailers. Plus, you can access cinema listings for your area, win
prizes, add your own reviews, and generally keep up to date on all things
movies. - http://www.bbc.co.uk/films/bbci/

Thanks,
Matt - Interactive Drama  Entertainment



-
Sent via the backstage.bbc.co.uk discussion group.  To unsubscribe, please 
visit http://backstage.bbc.co.uk/archives/2005/01/mailing_list.html.  
Unofficial list archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/backstage@lists.bbc.co.uk/




--
Mark Birbeck
CEO
x-port.net Ltd.

e: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
t: +44 (0) 20 7689 9232
w: http://www.formsPlayer.com/
b: http://internet-apps.blogspot.com/

Download our XForms processor from
http://www.formsPlayer.com/
-
Sent via the backstage.bbc.co.uk discussion group.  To unsubscribe, please 
visit http://backstage.bbc.co.uk/archives/2005/01/mailing_list.html.  
Unofficial list archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/backstage@lists.bbc.co.uk/


[backstage] Announcing phpconference2007 in London

2007-01-17 Thread paul morgan

hi all,
I mailed the backstage email addy as to whether it was ok to post, but  
got no reply back, so here goes:


phplondon conference 2007
23rd February 2007 @ The Keyworth Centre, London

After the success of the 2006 php conference, phplondon is organising  
a second conference for anyone who has an interest in all things php.  
You will be able to listen to an exciting mix of topics from these  
diverse and thought provoking speakers.


- Cal Evens (Zend) - My First Mashup
- Simon Laws (IBM) - Web services - drop it into Apache and away you go!
- Kevlin Henney - Objects of Desire
- Rasmus Lerdorf (Yahoo!) - Fast and Rich Web Applications with PHP 5
- William (Bill) Gaver (Goldsmiths University) - Ludic Interfaces


You will also have the opportunity to network with others and share  
experiences both at the conference itself and chat with the speakers  
informally at a special event afterwards.


Early bird price is £50, or £75 on the day. To find out more and book  
online visit us at http://www.phpconference.co.uk


thanks,
paul

--

__---
PHP London Member
http://www.phplondon.org
1st Thursday of every month.






-
Sent via the backstage.bbc.co.uk discussion group.  To unsubscribe, please 
visit http://backstage.bbc.co.uk/archives/2005/01/mailing_list.html.  
Unofficial list archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/backstage@lists.bbc.co.uk/