Re: [Bacula-users] block based or partial file based backup
Hello, Not yet in bacula, but you can take a look of xdelta, this tool will generate binary patches that you will be able to backup with bacula. Bye Daniel Kis wrote: > > Hi everyone! > > I would have a question regarding Bacula. > > I want to use Bacula to save for instance two 5 GB files daily. If only 2 > bytes change in these files each, is it possible to only save those 2*2 > bytes instead of 2*5gigs again? I think that this is called block-based or > partial file based backup. > > If this is not available directly with Bacula, is there another opensource > software that I can use to gather the data and feed it to our tapedrive > with > Bacula? > > Thanks for the answers! > > Regards, > Daniel > > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/block-based-or-partial-file-based-backup-tp19917523p19923686.html Sent from the Bacula - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/ ___ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
Re: [Bacula-users] file inclusion directive - @|sh - causes error
ahhh . . . from http://wiki.bacula.org/doku.php?id=sample_configs: 'Since Bacula 2.2.0 you can include the output of a command within a configuration file with the "@|" syntax' i'm on 2.0.3 . . . thanks for the help, guy Martin Simmons wrote: >> On Wed, 08 Oct 2008 10:44:17 -0400, Guy Matz said: >> >> hey-hey, >> i'm getting the following error when trying to use the "@|" notation to >> include multiple files . . . >> >> Starting bacula-dir: 03-Oct 18:40 bacula-dir: ERROR TERMINATION at lex.c:545 >> Config error: Cannot open included config file |: No such file or directory >> >> : line 4, col 3 of file /etc/bacula/bacula-dir.d/job.conf >> @|"sh -c 'cat /etc/bacula/bacula-dir.d/job.d/*.conf'" >> >> >> the content of my job.conf file is the "@|" line above, and the files >> referred to in the @| line do exist. >> >> any thoughts? >> > > Try putting the bar inside the quotes: > > @"|sh -c 'cat /etc/bacula/bacula-dir.d/job.d/*.conf'" > > __Martin - This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/___ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
Re: [Bacula-users] two drive autochanger and conflicting tape use
I am seeing the same problem. I have a recently installed bacula system (v2.4.2) installed on ~ 150 Solaris and Linux computers, with a total of ~ 175 jobs that are scheduled to be run at 18:30 every day. * I am using the standard schedule to run daily incremental 6 days/week, and either differential or full backups on the 7-th day at 18:30. Later in the day, a full backup of the catalog is scheduled at a lower (higher number) priority every day. * I have one Solaris 10 system that runs both my single storage daemon and director daemon as well as an fd daemon. * My storage system is a Sun/Storagetek Sl500 library with 2 LTO3 drives, both of which are set to AutoSelect = yes for use by the library. All jobs are configured to write the the library, which then selects the appropriate drives. I have 2 tape pools -- Incremental for Incremental and Differential jobs, and Full for Full backup jobs. All jobs are configured with SpoolData = yes, and I have spooling enabled for the 2 tape drives. I allow a total of 8 concurrent jobs to be run. The problem that I am encountering is that I will have 8 incremental jobs running, 4 assigned to each tape drive, but all jobs (and therefore both tape drives) are trying to write to the same tape even though I have multiple available tape drives assigned to the tape pool and in the library. When this happens, the 4 jobs assigned to the drive without the tape will hang until the rest of the incremental jobs have finished writing to the tape drive that has the tape mounted. I then have to manually release the tape from that drive and mount it in the other drive to allow the the 4 hung jobs to finish. My experience seems to indicate that if I have no tapes mounted in the drives when the backups are scheduled that the system will select 2 incremental tapes, one for each drive. However, if I have an incremental tape and a full tape loaded in each drive, the system will try to use the same tape in both drives. Does anyone have a suggestion before I open a bacula bug report? Thanks. - Doug N -- Doug Neuhauser University of California, Berkeley [EMAIL PROTECTED]Berkeley Seismological Laboratory Office: 510-642-0931215 McCone Hall # 4760 Fax:510-643-5811Berkeley, CA 94720-4760 Remote: 530-752-5615 (Wed,Fri) - This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/ ___ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
Re: [Bacula-users] Correct bacula-sd.conf setup for Sony SDX-400V
That worked...thanks!
Arch
-Original Message-
From: Bruno Friedmann [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, October 07, 2008 1:54 AM
Cc: 'Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net'
Subject: Re: [Bacula-users] Correct bacula-sd.conf setup for Sony SDX-400V
Just a remark about the
>> Media Type = 8mmAIT-2 # (what is this supposed to be set to??)
You could insert what you want here. In fact it's mainly use when concurrent
jobs are running.
But what important is that this param is ask during restore ( using bls, bscan
and other tools )
So If you want to be generic you could use Type=Tape0 ( Tape1 if you buy
another ... )
But you can run with what you've wrote.
Arch Willingham wrote:
> Thanks...I changed it and re-ran the test and it worked fine. Is the rest of
> that stuff ok?
>
> Thanks!
>
> Arch
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Jason A. Kates [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, October 06, 2008 12:52 AM
> To: Arch Willingham
> Cc: 'Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net'
> Subject: Re: [Bacula-users] Correct bacula-sd-conf setup for Sony SDX-400V
>
> The device should never be st0 as it's a rewind devive, you need the
> non rewind device, you should test nst0.
> -Jason
> On Mon, 2008-10-06 at 00:30 -0400, Arch Willingham wrote:
>> I have a Sony SDX-400V which I think is an AIT-1 drive. I ran all the
>> utils (I am using Fedora F9) I could find and I think I got it working
>> (“/root/bacula/bin/btape -c bacula-sd.conf /dev/st0” runs a test
>> correctly). I took a giant SWAG at how to setup the bacula-sd-conf. I
>> have no idea if half the stuff is correct…can someone out there verify
>> that this is correct?
>>
>>
>>
>> Device {
>>
>> Name = Sony_SDX-400V
>>
>> Media Type = 8mmAIT-2 # (what is this supposed to be set to??)
>>
>> #Archive Device = /dev/nst0
>>
>> Archive Device = /dev/st0
>>
>> AutomaticMount = yes
>>
>> AlwaysOpen = yes
>>
>> RemovableMedia = yes
>>
>> RandomAccess = no;
>>
>> Drive Index = 1
>>
>> # as recommended by btape
>>
>> # Hardware End of Medium = yes
>>
>> BSF at EOM = no
>>
>> # Autochanger = Yes
>>
>> # Changer Device = /dev/changer
>>
>> # Changer Command = "/home/bacula/etc/bacula/scripts/mtx-changer %c %
>> o %S %a 1"
>>
>> LabelMedia = yes
>>
>> }
>>
>>
>>
>> Here is the output from the different system utilities:
>>
>>
>>
>> # ./sonytape /dev/st0 -t
>>
>> SONY tape device detected.
>>
>> SONY SDX-400V Revision: 0102
>>
>> Getting nori drive trace.
>>
>> This process can take a few minutes.
>>
>> Nori drive trace length = 0x69fc8
>>
>> Nori drive trace complete(see nori_trace.txt).
>>
>> Done.
>>
>>
>>
>> # ./sonytape /dev/st0 -x datap.bin
>>
>> SONY tape device detected.
>>
>> SONY SDX-700V Revision: 0102
>>
>> Checking tape drive write and read function.
>>
>> Warning!! This process will write over data and takes several minutes.
>>
>> Data compression disabled.
>>
>>
>>
>> # ./sonytape /dev/st0 -w datap.bin
>>
>> SONY tape device detected.
>>
>> SONY SDX-700V Revision: 0102
>>
>> Checking tape drive write and read function.
>>
>> Warning!! This process will write over data and takes several minutes.
>>
>> Data compression disabled.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> # ./sonytape /dev/st0 -d 1
>>
>> SONY tape device detected.
>>
>> SONY SDX-700V Revision: 0102
>>
>> Data compression is currently disabled.
>>
>> Changing tape drive data compression setting.
>>
>> Data compression enabled.
>>
>> Done.
>>
>>
>>
>> I can’t remember what I ran to get this output below??
>>
>>
>>
>> SONY tape device detected.
>>
>> SONY SDX-700V Revision: 0102
>>
>> Checking tape drive write and read function.
>>
>> Warning!! This process will write over data and takes several minutes.
>>
>> Data compression disabled.
>>
>> 1,638 MBytes of incremented data was written in 383 seconds.
>>
>> Write transfer rate = 4.28 MBytes/sec
>>
>> 1,638 MBytes of incremented data was read in 383 seconds.
>>
>> Read transfer rate = 4.28 MBytes/sec
>>
>> Data compression enabled.
>>
>> 1,638 MBytes of incremented data was written in 147 seconds.
>>
>> Write transfer rate = 11.14 MBytes/sec
>>
>> 1,638 MBytes of incremented data was read in 146 seconds.
>>
>> Read transfer rate = 11.22 MBytes/sec
>>
>> Current RAW count: 6
>>
>> Current ECC-3 count: 1
>>
>> Current tape load count: 73
>>
>> Write and read function check complete.
>>
>> Done.
>>
>>
>>
>> Product Type: Tape Drive
>>
>> Vendor ID: 'SONY'
>>
>> Product ID: 'SDX-700V'
>>
>> Revision: '0102'
>>
>> Attached Changer API: No
>>
>> SerialNumber: '0009751387'
>>
>> MinBlock: 2
>>
>> MaxBlock: 16777215
>>
>> SCSI ID: 2
>>
>> SCSI LUN: 0
>>
>> Ready: yes
>>
>> BufferedMode: yes
>>
>> Medium Type: Not Loaded
>>
>> Density Code: 0x30
>>
>> BlockSize: 0
>>
>> DataCompEnabled: yes
>>
>> DataCompCapable: yes
>>
>> DataDeCompEnabled: yes
>>
>> CompType: 0x3
>>
>> DeCompType: 0x3
>>
>> BOP: yes
>>
>> Block Position: 0
>>
>> Partition 0 Remaining Kbytes: 34866680
>>
>> Par
Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula recycles Volumes instead of creating new ones
On Fri, Oct 10, 2008 at 11:39 AM, John Drescher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Fri, Oct 10, 2008 at 11:06 AM, Kjetil Torgrim Homme > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Marc Richter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> >>> Further, I want to know, why bacula recycles Volumes (which destroys >>> data) instead of creating new ones and if this is a Bug which should >>> be reported. >> >> I believe this is intended behaviour, and it's the behaviour I want. >> after all, when I tell Bacula I want to keep that backup for 180 days, >> that's what I actually mean, and I don't want Bacula to start using a >> fresh tape when an old tape can be recycled instead. (Note, Bacula >> should only recycle media which is present and available without human >> interaction.) >> > > No, this is definitely not intended behavior. Bacula is supposed to > protect media for how ever long you specify in your volume retention > period. > Sorry, I am wrong. I was thinking of a different thread where the user had volumes being recycled way before the retention period expired. John - This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/ ___ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula recycles Volumes instead of creating new ones
On Fri, Oct 10, 2008 at 11:39 AM, John Drescher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Fri, Oct 10, 2008 at 11:06 AM, Kjetil Torgrim Homme > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Marc Richter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> >>> Further, I want to know, why bacula recycles Volumes (which destroys >>> data) instead of creating new ones and if this is a Bug which should >>> be reported. >> >> I believe this is intended behaviour, and it's the behaviour I want. >> after all, when I tell Bacula I want to keep that backup for 180 days, >> that's what I actually mean, and I don't want Bacula to start using a >> fresh tape when an old tape can be recycled instead. (Note, Bacula >> should only recycle media which is present and available without human >> interaction.) >> > > No, this is definitely not intended behavior. Bacula is supposed to > protect media for how ever long you specify in your volume retention > period. > > John > -- John M. Drescher - This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/ ___ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula recycles Volumes instead of creating new ones
Marc Richter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Further, I want to know, why bacula recycles Volumes (which destroys > data) instead of creating new ones and if this is a Bug which should > be reported. I believe this is intended behaviour, and it's the behaviour I want. after all, when I tell Bacula I want to keep that backup for 180 days, that's what I actually mean, and I don't want Bacula to start using a fresh tape when an old tape can be recycled instead. (Note, Bacula should only recycle media which is present and available without human interaction.) -- regards, | Redpill _ Kjetil T. Homme | Linpro (_) - This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/ ___ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
Re: [Bacula-users] Again: restore all most recent backed up files without using full backups
>> I found out I accidentally deleted volumes with a full backup. Or >> the files are not in the database anymore. > the difference is significant, but it sounds like the latter is your > problem. I actually deleted some of the volumes to save space (the first few volumes; from vol1 to vol10 for example; but at that moment I had more than 40 volumes). I have no idea however if all full backups where on these volumes. I added my configuration as an attachment. Maybe this will give some more insight in the problem. Let's pretend that I actually did delete all volumes who had full backups. Can I still get the files which are saved in the incremental or decremental backups? > what is the exact message you're getting? I would expect Bacula to > ask you if you want a full restore instead. At this moment I can't look it up as this machines is not online. I will be able to use it again next thursday or friday. I browsed the net and I am pretty sure it was this: "No Full backup before 2003-10-25 22:36:42 found." Instead of the date above, it was the time and date of that moment itself. I also found this: https://cc.epsem.upc.edu/documentacio/how-to/restoring-when-things-go-wrong I will read it and see wait what you have to say before I take any action. Thank you very much for your time and helping me out! bacula-dir.conf Description: Binary data - This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/___ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula recycles Volumes instead of creating new ones
Noone knows about ?
If so, and I haven't an answer to this until Monday the 13th, I will
create a Bug Report for this, since this seems to be an
undocumented/defected behavior of bacula.
Regards,
Marc
Marc Richter schrieb:
> Hi There!
>
> This is my first mail to this list, so please be patient, if I'm missing
> a point.
>
> We're using Bacula for several months now. As "Backup Drive" we
> configured three pools. One pool for Monthly Backups within the months
> 1,3,5,...11, one pool for Monthly Backups within the months 2,4,6,...12
> and one pool for daily backups.
> The Monthly Storages are two HDDs with a capacity of 1 TB for each month
> and the Daily Pool is a NAS System with a Capacity of 3 TB.
> For the monthly Backups there is a maximum of 230 Volumes configured,
> each 4 GB in size. This is a total capacity of 920 GB.
>
> This week, the backup stopped, because the currently running job "is
> waiting for an appendable Volume".
> Our Volumes in that Pool/Storage are named
> Monatssicherung_gerade_VolumeNr.000 through
> Monatssicherung_gerade_VolumeNr.229 . The Volumes
> Monatssicherung_gerade_VolumeNr.001 through
> Monatssicherung_gerade_VolumeNr.029 didn't exist. Neither within the
> Filesystem, nor in the "list media pool=Monatssicherung_gerade_Pool"
> listing.
>
> In the past, bacula created these new Volumes itself, since this is the
> (so far as I understood the Config's Syntax while I set it up)
> configured behavior. But this time it just didn't. It hung and waited
> for ME to label a new Volume for it manually.
> I did so for 2 Volumes, hoping this "kickstarts" bacula's Auto-Labeling
> function, but it didn't.
>
> Here is my Config for the concerned Pool and Device setup:
>
> Pool {
> Name= "Monatssicherung_gerade_Pool"
> Pool Type = "Backup"
> Maximum Volume Bytes= 4294967296# 4 GB
> Maximum Volumes = 230 # 4 GB * 230 Volumes = ca. max
> 920 GB
> Label Format=
> "Monatssicherung_gerade_VolumeNr.${NumVols:p/3/0/r}"
> AutoPrune = "yes"
> Volume Retention= 55 days
> Recycle = "yes"
> }
>
> Device {
> Name= "monatsbackup_gerade_device"
> Device Type = "File"
> Media Type = "Wechselfestplatte"
> Autochanger = "no"
> Archive Device = "/server/data/backup/bacula_wechselrahmen"
> LabelMedia = "yes"
> Random Access = "Yes"
> AutomaticMount = "yes"
> RemovableMedia = "no"
> AlwaysOpen = "yes"
> }
>
> As far as I know, the "LabelMedia" Option within the Device's Definition
> should create Volumes if they are needed up to a limit of 230 Volumes
> with a size of 4 GB each.
>
> Further, bacula should try to preserve Data as long as it's possible.
> So, labeling a new volume should be preferred to recycling pruned Volumes.
> I lowered the Volume Retention Time from 60 to 55 days. This I did,
> because there once were a Retention time of 60 Days configured, later
> lowered to 55 Days, but the existing Volumes never have been updated
> with these settings. So I did, using the update command to "clean" the
> Config.
> This pruned some Volumes, wich were older than 55 days, but not older
> than 60 days. So bacula used these pruned Volumes to recycle them and
> finish the Backup. The Volumes *.003 through *.029 are still missing.
>
> I know that I can label them manually, but I want to Know why bacula
> stopped doing it automatically.
> Further, I want to know, why bacula recycles Volumes (which destroys
> data) instead of creating new ones and if this is a Bug which should be
> reported.
>
> Thank you for your help!
>
> greetings,
> Marc
>
--
Marketing Factory Consulting GmbH * mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Stephanienstrasse 36 * Tel.: +49 211-361176-44
D-40211 Duesseldorf, Germany * Fax : +49 211-361176-45
Amtsgericht Duesseldorf HRB 53971 * http://www.marketing-factory.de/
Geschaeftsfuehrer: Peter Faisst | Katja Faisst
Karoline Steinfatt | Christoph Allefeld | Markus M. Kimmel
-
This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge
Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes
Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world
http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/
___
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
[Bacula-users] block based or partial file based backup
Hi everyone! I would have a question regarding Bacula. I want to use Bacula to save for instance two 5 GB files daily. If only 2 bytes change in these files each, is it possible to only save those 2*2 bytes instead of 2*5gigs again? I think that this is called block-based or partial file based backup. If this is not available directly with Bacula, is there another opensource software that I can use to gather the data and feed it to our tapedrive with Bacula? Thanks for the answers! Regards, Daniel - This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/___ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula makes a full backup instead an incremental backup -> Why?
Hi > Does anybody got the same problem in the past? I find that if you change the FileSet it does a full backup. -- Adrian Moisey Systems Administrator | CareerJunction | Your Future Starts Here. Web: www.careerjunction.co.za | Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Phone: +27 21 818 8621 | Mobile: +27 82 858 7830 | Fax: +27 21 818 8855 - This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/ ___ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
Re: [Bacula-users] mysql database: table batch
Table 'bacula.batch' is temporary. MySQL man: "A TEMPORARY table is visible only to the current connection, and is dropped automatically when the connection is closed. This means that two different connections can use the same temporary table name without conflicting with each other or with an existing non-TEMPORARY table of the same name. (The existing table is hidden until the temporary table is dropped.) " 2008/10/7 Hösch Roland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Hello, > > I'm using bacula 2.4.1 on ubuntu 8.04. > > I'm doing backups of different clients, which are working. > But the backup of one client (my server: this is where director, fd, sd and > mysql are running), which is the largest amount of data to be saved, failes: > > nas-fd JobId 1603: /music is a different filesystem. Will not descend > from / into /music > 07-Okt 08:01 nas-dir JobId 1603: Fatal error: sql_create.c:732 > sql_create.c:732 insert INSERT INTO batch VALUES > (400500,1603,'/','vmlinuz.old','gC MAD KH/ B A A A d BAA A BI6d8W BHXVoe > BIbMDj A A E','0') failed: > Table 'bacula.batch' doesn't exist > 07-Okt 08:01 nas-dir JobId 1603: sql_create.c:732 INSERT INTO batch VALUES > (400500,1603,'/','vmlinuz.old','gC MAD KH/ B A A A d BAA A BI6d8W BHXVoe > BIbMDj A A E','0') > 07-Okt 08:01 nas-dir JobId 1603: Fatal error: catreq.c:413 Attribute create > error. No prior Full backup Job record found. > > THis is strange, because there is no table batch within the database bacula. > > Is there a problem with the version of my bacula mysql database? > > Thanks, Roland > > - > This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge > Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes > Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world > http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/ > ___ > Bacula-users mailing list > Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users > -- with best regards - This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/ ___ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
