Re: [Bacula-users] choosing database.

[lst_hoe02]

Zitat von Mauro :

> On 19 September 2013 21:53,  wrote:
>
>>
>> Zitat von Konstantin Khomoutov :
>>
>>
>> Our biggest single job has about 1TB data with some 3.3 million files.
>> This lead to around 1GB spooled attributes which will be absorbed in
>> less then 2 minutes. Database is Postgres with some minimal tuning:
>>
>> shared_buffers = 128MB
>> temp_buffers = 32MB
>> work_mem = 32MB
>> maintenance_work_mem = 64MB
>> checkpoint_segments = 32
>> checkpoint_completion_target = 0.9
>>
>> That's all
>>
>> Database hovers around 21GB in size with with some 57 million rows in
>> the file table.
>>
>
> how much ram you have in your server?

The whole server has 8GB, but that only needed for Bacula director in  
case of restoring some million files ;-)

Regards

Andreas



--
LIMITED TIME SALE - Full Year of Microsoft Training For Just $49.99!
1,500+ hours of tutorials including VisualStudio 2012, Windows 8, SharePoint
2013, SQL 2012, MVC 4, more. BEST VALUE: New Multi-Library Power Pack includes
Mobile, Cloud, Java, and UX Design. Lowest price ever! Ends 9/20/13. 
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=58041151&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
___
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users

Re: [Bacula-users] Why Marking Volume "XXXXXX" in Error in Catalog.

[Radosław Korzeniewski]

Hello,

2013/9/19 

>  Dear Team,
>
> ** **
>
> While running a Incremental Job on a volume I received below errors.
>
> ** **
>
> 19-Sep 22:06 backup-sd JobId 129: 3305 Autochanger "load slot 5, drive 0",
> status is OK.
>
> 19-Sep 22:06 backup-sd JobId 129: Volume "A00044L4" previously written,
> moving to end of data.
>
> 19-Sep 22:08 backup-sd JobId 129: Error: Bacula cannot write on tape
> Volume "A00044L4" because:
>
> *The number of files mismatch! Volume=14 Catalog=29*
>
> 19-Sep 22:08 backup-sd JobId 129: Marking Volume "A00044L4" in Error in
> Catalog.
>
> 19-Sep 22:08 backup-sd JobId 129: 3307 Issuing autochanger "unload slot 5,
> drive 0" command.
>
> ** **
>
> After that job suspended with errors as there was no more volume in pool.
> This is reflected from logs that this error comes due to mismatch between
> actual files on volume and file numbers in catalog. 
>
> **1.  **please tell me how this happen ?
>
I saw this kind of errors when SD write something to the volume, but has
problem in updating the catalog. In this case number of files on volume was
greater then on catalog. This is opposite situation then your.


> 
>
> **2.  **what I can do to avoid this situation again?
>
I don't know.

> 
>
> **3.  **This volume is marked as ERROR what I should do to repair
> this volume to continue to use it as a good volume?
>
I recommend to purge the volume and start writing from beginning. You can
update a number of files in catalog for this volume, but I cannot guarantee
that it do not break anything.


>
> **4.  **Can I still restore my files from this volume?
>
> **
>
It is possible. Check what is written to the volume with bls utility.

best regards
-- 
Radosław Korzeniewski
rados...@korzeniewski.net
--
LIMITED TIME SALE - Full Year of Microsoft Training For Just $49.99!
1,500+ hours of tutorials including VisualStudio 2012, Windows 8, SharePoint
2013, SQL 2012, MVC 4, more. BEST VALUE: New Multi-Library Power Pack includes
Mobile, Cloud, Java, and UX Design. Lowest price ever! Ends 9/20/13. 
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=58041151&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk___
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users

Re: [Bacula-users] Is anyone using >128K blocks with LTO-4 or LTO-5 drives?

[Thomas]

Hi Andreas,

we are using also LTO-5 with 2M Blocksize and without any Problems.

Drives and Kernel are:

Linux 3.2.0-4-amd64 #1 SMP Debian 3.2.46-1+deb7u1 x86_64 GNU/Linux
Medium ChangerOVERLAND NEO Series
IBM  ULTRIUM-TD5
IBM  ULTRIUM-TD5

the btape tests fails like in your example, but backup and restore are working 
fine.

Best regards
Thomas

-- 
[:O]###[O:]


--
LIMITED TIME SALE - Full Year of Microsoft Training For Just $49.99!
1,500+ hours of tutorials including VisualStudio 2012, Windows 8, SharePoint
2013, SQL 2012, MVC 4, more. BEST VALUE: New Multi-Library Power Pack includes
Mobile, Cloud, Java, and UX Design. Lowest price ever! Ends 9/20/13. 
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=58041151&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
___
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users

Re: [Bacula-users] choosing database.

[Uwe Schuerkamp]

On Thu, Sep 19, 2013 at 11:07:47AM -0500, Dimitri Maziuk wrote:
> 
> Mysql is known for "features" like inserting 0 in a NOT NULL column
> instead of throwing errors, case-sensitive identifiers, and so on and so
> forth, with Oracle lawyers looming in the background. I wouldn't pick it
> for anything even if I weren't already familiar with postgres.
> 

I migrated all of our bacula catalogs from mysql to mariadb 5.x over
the course of the last year and have been a happy camper ever
since. Our largest catalog instance has nearly 400 million rows in the
file table on a DL380 server with 18GB RAM, and performance seems o.k.

All the best, Uwe 

-- 
NIONEX --- Ein Unternehmen der Bertelsmann SE & Co. KGaA



--
LIMITED TIME SALE - Full Year of Microsoft Training For Just $49.99!
1,500+ hours of tutorials including VisualStudio 2012, Windows 8, SharePoint
2013, SQL 2012, MVC 4, more. BEST VALUE: New Multi-Library Power Pack includes
Mobile, Cloud, Java, and UX Design. Lowest price ever! Ends 9/20/13. 
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=58041151&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
___
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users

Re: [Bacula-users] upgrading bacula from one server to an entirely different piece of hardware

[Uwe Schuerkamp]

On Thu, Sep 19, 2013 at 04:30:58PM -0700, Jared Kelley wrote:
> Bconsole tells me I'm running this version of bacula.
> *version
> backup1-dir Version: 3.0.1 (30 April 2009) i686-pc-linux-gnu debian 5.0.1
> 
> I inherited this setup and need to upgrade on a new server because the raid 
> controller on the old server is failing.
> My question is this:
> Will the current config files be compatible with the latest version of 
> bacula?  I'm planning on using apt-get to install the packages.
> Since this installation will happen on totally different hardware I'm hoping 
> to avoid having to redo my config files.
> Thoughts on this procedure?
> 

I'd recommend compiling from source. It's not that hard and it's quite
easy to keep different bacula versions (with the same catalog version)
alongside each other in case things break. 

You can then copy over the old config and use bacula-dir -t to check
for any syntatic problems with the latest version of bacula. 

something like 

configure --prefix=/server/bacula-5.2.13

after extracting the tarball and cd'ing to the src dir should get you
going.

You will most likely have to run several "upgrade bacula tables"
scripts  on the old catalog which could take a while depending on your
database size. 

All the best, Uwe 

-- 
NIONEX --- Ein Unternehmen der Bertelsmann SE & Co. KGaA



--
LIMITED TIME SALE - Full Year of Microsoft Training For Just $49.99!
1,500+ hours of tutorials including VisualStudio 2012, Windows 8, SharePoint
2013, SQL 2012, MVC 4, more. BEST VALUE: New Multi-Library Power Pack includes
Mobile, Cloud, Java, and UX Design. Lowest price ever! Ends 9/20/13. 
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=58041151&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
___
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users

Re: [Bacula-users] An article about managing disk space

[Uwe Schuerkamp]

Nice work, thanks for sharing! 

Maybe a word or two on preventing this situation in the first place
might be helpful, like restricting volume sizes & number? 

Also, you could consider documenting deleting a volume from a disk
pool (update pool from resource and so on) once the reader has cleaned
up the current mess ;-) 

All the best, Uwe 


-- 
NIONEX --- Ein Unternehmen der Bertelsmann SE & Co. KGaA



--
LIMITED TIME SALE - Full Year of Microsoft Training For Just $49.99!
1,500+ hours of tutorials including VisualStudio 2012, Windows 8, SharePoint
2013, SQL 2012, MVC 4, more. BEST VALUE: New Multi-Library Power Pack includes
Mobile, Cloud, Java, and UX Design. Lowest price ever! Ends 9/20/13. 
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=58041151&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
___
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users

Re: [Bacula-users] Why Marking Volume "XXXXXX" in Error in Catalog.

[deepak.pal]

Hi,

I am using uncompressed backup.

From: Radosław Korzeniewski [mailto:rados...@korzeniewski.net]
Sent: Friday, September 20, 2013 5:33 PM
To: Deepak Pal (WI01 - GIS - RCT); bacula-users
Subject: Re: [Bacula-users] Why Marking Volume "XX" in Error in Catalog.

Hello,

2013/9/20 mailto:deepak@wipro.com>>
Thanks for Reply…!!!


I come to know that, there was no more space for mysql database. So Catalog was 
not able to grow .  ☺

I am facing one more Issue.


I have three volumes in my data pool which I have created with  “volume 
retention= 3 months” parameter . In have below questions.


1.   On volume one bacula has written only 680 GB of data while Tapes 
capacity is 800 GB and its moved on to append to next Volume. Why it is 
happening?
Question: 800GB with or without compression?

2.   It is writing on volume two and three months are completed still it is 
showing volume one status as “Append” It should be Purged I think or Full ?
Retention time starts as soon as volume status become Full or Used. If you fill 
your volume very slow then setup Volume Use Duration parameter. In this case 
after "Volume Use Duration" time volume will be automatically updated to Used 
status and retention time starts.

best regards
--
Radosław Korzeniewski
rados...@korzeniewski.net
--
LIMITED TIME SALE - Full Year of Microsoft Training For Just $49.99!
1,500+ hours of tutorials including VisualStudio 2012, Windows 8, SharePoint
2013, SQL 2012, MVC 4, more. BEST VALUE: New Multi-Library Power Pack includes
Mobile, Cloud, Java, and UX Design. Lowest price ever! Ends 9/20/13. 
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=58041151&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk___
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users

Re: [Bacula-users] Is anyone using >128K blocks with LTO-4 or LTO-5 drives?

[Andreas Koch]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

On 09/20/2013 10:21 AM, Thomas wrote:
> Hi Andreas,
> 
> we are using also LTO-5 with 2M Blocksize and without any Problems.
> 
> Drives and Kernel are:
> 
> Linux 3.2.0-4-amd64 #1 SMP Debian 3.2.46-1+deb7u1 x86_64 GNU/Linux Medium
> ChangerOVERLAND NEO Series IBM  ULTRIUM-TD5 IBM  ULTRIUM-TD5
> 
> the btape tests fails like in your example, but backup and restore are
> working fine.

Many thanks for the data point! When we use Bacula (not just btape) with
larger block sizes (512 KB), our backups abort when bacula fails to read the
tape's header block.

I notice you have IBM drives. Maybe the block size limitation (for some
reason or other) shows just up on HP drives? Our prior IBM LTO-4 drives also
worked quite nicely with larger blocks.

Best,
  Andreas
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.14 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/

iEYEARECAAYFAlI8Ph8ACgkQk5ta2EV7DoySoACeLxGpAHyGzGP0vgY9jQkv9uRm
6NIAoJ88xM5QCXFxXPngTOS9NetsJjPz
=Jum+
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

--
LIMITED TIME SALE - Full Year of Microsoft Training For Just $49.99!
1,500+ hours of tutorials including VisualStudio 2012, Windows 8, SharePoint
2013, SQL 2012, MVC 4, more. BEST VALUE: New Multi-Library Power Pack includes
Mobile, Cloud, Java, and UX Design. Lowest price ever! Ends 9/20/13. 
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=58041151&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
___
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users

Re: [Bacula-users] Why Marking Volume "XXXXXX" in Error in Catalog.

[Radosław Korzeniewski]

Hello,

2013/9/20 

>  Thanks for Reply…!!!
>
> ** **
>
> ** **
>
> I come to know that, there was no more space for mysql database. So
> Catalog was not able to grow .  J
>
> ** **
>
> I am facing one more Issue.
>
> ** **
>
> ** **
>
> I have three volumes in my data pool which I have created with  “volume
> retention= 3 months” parameter . In have below questions.
>
> ** **
>
> **1.   **On volume one bacula has written only 680 GB of data while
> Tapes capacity is 800 GB and its moved on to append to next Volume. Why it
> is happening?
>
Question: 800GB with or without compression?

> 
>
> **2.   **It is writing on volume two and three months are completed
> still it is showing volume one status as “Append” It should be Purged I
> think or Full ?
>
Retention time starts as soon as volume status become Full or Used. If you
fill your volume very slow then setup Volume Use Duration parameter. In
this case after "Volume Use Duration" time volume will be automatically
updated to Used status and retention time starts.

best regards
-- 
Radosław Korzeniewski
rados...@korzeniewski.net
--
LIMITED TIME SALE - Full Year of Microsoft Training For Just $49.99!
1,500+ hours of tutorials including VisualStudio 2012, Windows 8, SharePoint
2013, SQL 2012, MVC 4, more. BEST VALUE: New Multi-Library Power Pack includes
Mobile, Cloud, Java, and UX Design. Lowest price ever! Ends 9/20/13. 
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=58041151&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk___
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users

Re: [Bacula-users] Why Marking Volume "XXXXXX" in Error in Catalog.

[Radosław Korzeniewski]

Hello,

2013/9/20 

>  Hi,
>
> ** **
>
> I am using uncompressed backup.
>
> **
>

So, check your backup job logs or show these logs here.


and please, do not topposting.

best regards
-- 
Radosław Korzeniewski
rados...@korzeniewski.net
--
LIMITED TIME SALE - Full Year of Microsoft Training For Just $49.99!
1,500+ hours of tutorials including VisualStudio 2012, Windows 8, SharePoint
2013, SQL 2012, MVC 4, more. BEST VALUE: New Multi-Library Power Pack includes
Mobile, Cloud, Java, and UX Design. Lowest price ever! Ends 9/20/13. 
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=58041151&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk___
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users

Re: [Bacula-users] Is anyone using >128K blocks with LTO-4 or LTO-5 drives?

[Alex Crow]

Original Message
*Subject:* Re: [Bacula-users] Is anyone using >128K blocks with LTO-4 or 
LTO-5

drives?
*Date:* Fri, 20 Sep 2013 14:22:55 +0200
*From:* Andreas Koch 
*To:* Thomas 
*CC:* bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net




Many thanks for the data point! When we use Bacula (not just btape) with
larger block sizes (512 KB), our backups abort when bacula fails to read the
tape's header block.

I notice you have IBM drives. Maybe the block size limitation (for some
reason or other) shows just up on HP drives? Our prior IBM LTO-4 drives also
worked quite nicely with larger blocks.



Hi,

I'm using an HP MSL4048 with 1M blocks and backups are working fine.

Cheers

Alex




--

This message is intended only for the addressee and may contain
confidential information. Unless you are that person, you may not
disclose its contents or use it in any way and are requested to delete
the message along with any attachments and notify us immediately.
"Transact" is operated by Integrated Financial Arrangements plc. 29
Clement's Lane, London EC4N 7AE. Tel: (020) 7608 4900 Fax: (020) 7608
5300. (Registered office: as above; Registered in England and Wales
under number: 3727592). Authorised and regulated by the Financial
Conduct Authority (entered on the Financial Services Register; no. 190856).

--
LIMITED TIME SALE - Full Year of Microsoft Training For Just $49.99!
1,500+ hours of tutorials including VisualStudio 2012, Windows 8, SharePoint
2013, SQL 2012, MVC 4, more. BEST VALUE: New Multi-Library Power Pack includes
Mobile, Cloud, Java, and UX Design. Lowest price ever! Ends 9/20/13. 
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=58041151&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk___
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users

Re: [Bacula-users] An article about managing disk space

[Jeff MacDonald]

On 2013-09-20, at 6:08 AM, Uwe Schuerkamp  wrote:

> Nice work, thanks for sharing! 
> 
> Maybe a word or two on preventing this situation in the first place
> might be helpful, like restricting volume sizes & number? 
> 
> Also, you could consider documenting deleting a volume from a disk
> pool (update pool from resource and so on) once the reader has cleaned
> up the current mess ;-) 
> 
> All the best, Uwe 

Hi Uwe and John,

Thanks for the suggestions. I"ve added most of them except for the second from 
from Uwe about dleting a volume.

I already have details for deleting a volume, but I think I'm mis understanding 
what you mean by updating the pool afterwards.

Or do you mean that if you RM a volume before calling delete that you have to 
then do an update pool? 

http://www.bignose.ca/2013/09/19/bacula-disk-space-management/

Jeff.

--
LIMITED TIME SALE - Full Year of Microsoft Training For Just $49.99!
1,500+ hours of tutorials including VisualStudio 2012, Windows 8, SharePoint
2013, SQL 2012, MVC 4, more. BEST VALUE: New Multi-Library Power Pack includes
Mobile, Cloud, Java, and UX Design. Lowest price ever! Ends 9/20/13. 
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=58041151&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk___
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users

Re: [Bacula-users] Is anyone using >128K blocks with LTO-4 or LTO-5 drives?

[Andreas Koch]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

On 09/20/2013 03:43 PM, Alan Brown wrote:
> On 20/09/13 13:22, Andreas Koch wrote:
>> 
>> Many thanks for the data point! When we use Bacula (not just btape)
>> with larger block sizes (512 KB), our backups abort when bacula fails
>> to read the tape's header block.
>> 
> 
> Did you attempt to mix blocksizes on the same physical tape?

No. I initially tried writing with 512 KB to our existing tapes for
differentials (that were written on LTO-4 drives onto the same tapes, also
with 512 KB).

> That will not work. If you change block sizes all existing tapes holding
> data must be marked "used" and new ones labelled.

That was my second attempt: Freshly labelled tapes. All tries with 512KB
failed as described previously, only 128 KB succeeded.

As with btape, the problem with the larger block sizes did not come up
during writing, but during reading. This lead to all backups failing, since
Bacula appears to read the on-tape header block before writing the actual
backup.

> I run 2Mb block size quite happily on HP LTO5 drives and have done for a
> few years. They are capable of 16Mb - we are limited to 2Mb by Bacula.

Hmm, curiouser and curiouser! I'll wait and see whether btape gets fixed to
accept the larger block sizes and then proceed to run more tests.

Many thanks for all the feedback!

Best,
  Andreas
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.14 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/

iEYEARECAAYFAlI8VUAACgkQk5ta2EV7Dox3tgCeKa3jVjtuyr5RX98yysxCD3vh
bY8AoIwuGwOF18i+yMKnyn13Eu+4WmW2
=Auzt
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

--
LIMITED TIME SALE - Full Year of Microsoft Training For Just $49.99!
1,500+ hours of tutorials including VisualStudio 2012, Windows 8, SharePoint
2013, SQL 2012, MVC 4, more. BEST VALUE: New Multi-Library Power Pack includes
Mobile, Cloud, Java, and UX Design. Lowest price ever! Ends 9/20/13. 
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=58041151&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
___
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users

Re: [Bacula-users] Is anyone using >128K blocks with LTO-4 or LTO-5 drives?

[Alan Brown]

On 20/09/13 13:22, Andreas Koch wrote:
>
> Many thanks for the data point! When we use Bacula (not just btape) with
> larger block sizes (512 KB), our backups abort when bacula fails to read the
> tape's header block.
>

Did you attempt to mix blocksizes on the same physical tape?

That will not work. If you change block sizes all existing tapes holding 
data must be marked "used" and new ones labelled.

I run 2Mb block size quite happily on HP LTO5 drives and have done for a 
few years. They are capable of 16Mb - we are limited to 2Mb by Bacula.





--
LIMITED TIME SALE - Full Year of Microsoft Training For Just $49.99!
1,500+ hours of tutorials including VisualStudio 2012, Windows 8, SharePoint
2013, SQL 2012, MVC 4, more. BEST VALUE: New Multi-Library Power Pack includes
Mobile, Cloud, Java, and UX Design. Lowest price ever! Ends 9/20/13. 
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=58041151&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
___
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users

Re: [Bacula-users] Is anyone using >128K blocks with LTO-4 or LTO-5 drives?

[Thomas]

it seems that bacula's limit is "<= 400"
from src/stored/block.c :

>if (block_len > 400) {
>   Dmsg3(20, "Dump block %s 0x%x blocksize too big %u\n", msg, b, 
> block_len);
>   return;
>}


another limit i found is this one from the output of "dmesg | grep st" :

> [3.695203] st0: Block limits 1 - 8388608 bytes.
> [3.697814] st1: Block limits 1 - 8388608 bytes.



Am 20.09.2013 16:01, schrieb Andreas Koch:
> On 09/20/2013 03:43 PM, Alan Brown wrote:
> > On 20/09/13 13:22, Andreas Koch wrote:
> >>
> >> Many thanks for the data point! When we use Bacula (not just btape)
> >> with larger block sizes (512 KB), our backups abort when bacula fails
> >> to read the tape's header block.
> >>
>
> > Did you attempt to mix blocksizes on the same physical tape?
>
> No. I initially tried writing with 512 KB to our existing tapes for
> differentials (that were written on LTO-4 drives onto the same tapes, also
> with 512 KB).
>
> > That will not work. If you change block sizes all existing tapes holding
> > data must be marked "used" and new ones labelled.
>
> That was my second attempt: Freshly labelled tapes. All tries with 512KB
> failed as described previously, only 128 KB succeeded.
>
> As with btape, the problem with the larger block sizes did not come up
> during writing, but during reading. This lead to all backups failing, since
> Bacula appears to read the on-tape header block before writing the actual
> backup.
>
> > I run 2Mb block size quite happily on HP LTO5 drives and have done for a
> > few years. They are capable of 16Mb - we are limited to 2Mb by Bacula.
>
> Hmm, curiouser and curiouser! I'll wait and see whether btape gets fixed to
> accept the larger block sizes and then proceed to run more tests.
>
> Many thanks for all the feedback!
>
> Best,
>   Andreas

-- 
[:O]###[O:]
Besser man könnte da langfahren wo man nicht muss, als wenn man wo langfahren 
muss wo man nicht
kann.


--
LIMITED TIME SALE - Full Year of Microsoft Training For Just $49.99!
1,500+ hours of tutorials including VisualStudio 2012, Windows 8, SharePoint
2013, SQL 2012, MVC 4, more. BEST VALUE: New Multi-Library Power Pack includes
Mobile, Cloud, Java, and UX Design. Lowest price ever! Ends 9/20/13. 
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=58041151&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
___
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users

Re: [Bacula-users] Is anyone using >128K blocks with LTO-4 or LTO-5 drives?

[Rao, Uthra R. (GSFC-672.0)[ADNET SYSTEMS INC]]

I am curious to find out if I change the block size will I be able to go back 
and restore data from tapes that has the old block size?

Thanks,
URao

-Original Message-
From: Alan Brown [mailto:a...@mssl.ucl.ac.uk] 
Sent: Friday, September 20, 2013 9:44 AM
To: Andreas Koch
Cc: bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Bacula-users] Is anyone using >128K blocks with LTO-4 or LTO-5 
drives?

On 20/09/13 13:22, Andreas Koch wrote:
>
> Many thanks for the data point! When we use Bacula (not just btape) 
> with larger block sizes (512 KB), our backups abort when bacula fails 
> to read the tape's header block.
>

Did you attempt to mix blocksizes on the same physical tape?

That will not work. If you change block sizes all existing tapes holding data 
must be marked "used" and new ones labelled.

I run 2Mb block size quite happily on HP LTO5 drives and have done for a few 
years. They are capable of 16Mb - we are limited to 2Mb by Bacula.





--
LIMITED TIME SALE - Full Year of Microsoft Training For Just $49.99!
1,500+ hours of tutorials including VisualStudio 2012, Windows 8, SharePoint
2013, SQL 2012, MVC 4, more. BEST VALUE: New Multi-Library Power Pack includes
Mobile, Cloud, Java, and UX Design. Lowest price ever! Ends 9/20/13. 
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=58041151&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
___
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users

--
LIMITED TIME SALE - Full Year of Microsoft Training For Just $49.99!
1,500+ hours of tutorials including VisualStudio 2012, Windows 8, SharePoint
2013, SQL 2012, MVC 4, more. BEST VALUE: New Multi-Library Power Pack includes
Mobile, Cloud, Java, and UX Design. Lowest price ever! Ends 9/20/13. 
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=58041151&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
___
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users

Re: [Bacula-users] Is anyone using >128K blocks with LTO-4 or LTO-5 drives?

[Brian Debelius]

On 09/20/2013 04:21 AM, Thomas wrote:
> Hi Andreas,
>
> we are using also LTO-5 with 2M Blocksize and without any Problems.
>
> Drives and Kernel are:
>
> Linux 3.2.0-4-amd64 #1 SMP Debian 3.2.46-1+deb7u1 x86_64 GNU/Linux
> Medium ChangerOVERLAND NEO Series
> IBM  ULTRIUM-TD5
> IBM  ULTRIUM-TD5
>
> the btape tests fails like in your example, but backup and restore are 
> working fine.
>
> Best regards
> Thomas
>
I wonder if its just a bug in btape then.

Brian-

--
LIMITED TIME SALE - Full Year of Microsoft Training For Just $49.99!
1,500+ hours of tutorials including VisualStudio 2012, Windows 8, SharePoint
2013, SQL 2012, MVC 4, more. BEST VALUE: New Multi-Library Power Pack includes
Mobile, Cloud, Java, and UX Design. Lowest price ever! Ends 9/20/13. 
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=58041151&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
___
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users

Re: [Bacula-users] Is anyone using >128K blocks with LTO-4 or LTO-5 drives?

[Alan Brown]

On 20/09/13 15:03, Andreas Koch wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Hi Alan,
>
> can you let me know what hardware (SAS Controller) and OS (kernel version)
> you use?

Everything is FC connected using QLA 2430-series controllers.

When linux first connects to the drives it reports the largest block 
size supported by the devices in dmesg and on the console.

This information is also obtainable using tapeinfo:

# tapeinfo -f /etc/bacula/DEVICES/CHANGER2-DRIVE6-sg
Product Type: Tape Drive
Vendor ID: 'HP  '
Product ID: 'Ultrium 5-SCSI  '
Revision: 'I57H'
Attached Changer: No
SerialNumber: 'HUE23108AJ'
MinBlock:1
MaxBlock:16777215
^
SCSI ID: 1
SCSI LUN: 0
Ready: yes
BufferedMode: yes
Medium Type: Not Loaded
Density Code: 0x58
BlockSize: 0
DataCompEnabled: yes
DataCompCapable: yes
DataDeCompEnabled: yes
CompType: 0x1
DeCompType: 0x1
Block Position: 971091

/etc/bacula/DEVICES/CHANGER2-DRIVE6-sg is just a symlink through to 
/dev/tape/by-id which makes it easier to debug errors.

We also have some older LTO2 drives which report 16Mb support.

Alan





--
LIMITED TIME SALE - Full Year of Microsoft Training For Just $49.99!
1,500+ hours of tutorials including VisualStudio 2012, Windows 8, SharePoint
2013, SQL 2012, MVC 4, more. BEST VALUE: New Multi-Library Power Pack includes
Mobile, Cloud, Java, and UX Design. Lowest price ever! Ends 9/20/13. 
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=58041151&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
___
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users

[Bacula-users] Fatal error: Authorization key rejected by Storage daemon.

[Kevin B. Zimmerman]

Greetings -

I'm running Bacula 5.2.5 on an Ubuntu 12.04.3 server, with about 61TB of 
disk storage and an attached Dell PVTL2000 tape library. Backups are 
working great, but restores are presenting a problem.

Here's my dilemma:

When attempting to restore a file, I get this status for about 10 minutes:

  JobId Level   Name   Status
==
  19085 Restore-public-Disk.2013-09-20_12.43.48_32 is waiting 
for Client to connect to Storage daemon

and then this error:

20-Sep 12:09 khq-backups2-dir JobId 19084: Start Restore Job 
Restore-public-Disk.2013-09-20_12.09.20_02
20-Sep 12:09 khq-backups2-dir JobId 19084: Using Device "DiskStorage"
20-Sep 12:19 public-fd JobId 19084: Fatal error: Authorization key rejected by 
Storage daemon.
Please seehttp://www.bacula.org/rel-manual/faq.html#AuthorizationErrors  for 
help.
20-Sep 12:19 public-fd JobId 19084: Fatal error: Failed to authenticate Storage 
daemon.
20-Sep 12:19 khq-backups2-dir JobId 19084: Fatal error: Socket error on Storage 
command: ERR=No data available
20-Sep 12:19 khq-backups2-dir JobId 19084: Error: Bacula khq-backups2-dir 5.2.5 
(26Jan12):
   Build OS:   x86_64-pc-linux-gnu ubuntu 12.04
   JobId:  19084
   Job:Restore-public-Disk.2013-09-20_12.09.20_02
   Restore Client: public-fd
   Start time: 20-Sep-2013 12:09:22
   End time:   20-Sep-2013 12:19:33
   Files Expected: 1
   Files Restored: 0
   Bytes Restored: 0
   Rate:   0.0 KB/s
   FD Errors:  1
   FD termination status:
   SD termination status:  Waiting on FD
   Termination:*** Restore Error ***

20-Sep 12:19 khq-backups2-dir JobId 19084: Error: Bacula khq-backups2-dir 5.2.5 
(26Jan12):
   Build OS:   x86_64-pc-linux-gnu ubuntu 12.04
   JobId:  19084
   Job:Restore-public-Disk.2013-09-20_12.09.20_02
   Restore Client: public-fd
   Start time: 20-Sep-2013 12:09:22
   End time:   20-Sep-2013 12:19:33
   Files Expected: 1
   Files Restored: 0
   Bytes Restored: 0
   Rate:   0.0 KB/s
   FD Errors:  2
   FD termination status:
   SD termination status:  Waiting on FD
   Termination:*** Restore Error ***

So I went to check out 
http://www.bacula.org/rel-manual/faq.html#AuthorizationErrors as 
suggested by the error, but it doesn't exist.  I looked at 
http://www.bacula.org/5.2.x-manuals/en/problems/problems/Bacula_Frequently_Asked_Que.html#SECTION0026
 
presuming it to be the same, but it didn't help.

I'm not sure why it fails on auth.  It uses the same password to run 
backups, and those work fine.
I tested connectivity between the two systems, and both are able to talk 
to each other (port 9102 on client, ports 9102 & 9103 on each of the 
server's many IPs).
Max Concurrent Jobs are set to 7 in all configs, and no other jobs are 
running.

One thing I noticed was that after selecting the file(s) to restore, I 
get this:

The job will require the following
Volume(s) Storage(s)SD Device(s)
===

 DiskPool0197  File_20   DiskStorage

This particular client uses File_5, which may be part of the problem, 
though I don't understand why.  That volume (DiskPool0197) has backups 
from many different clients, from many different VLANs.

Some relevant info:

In trying to reduce network overhead, the backup server has been added 
to each of the VLANs where the Bacula clients reside, resulting in 
numerous file and tape storage definitions.  Here's a subset of the file 
definitions:

Storage {
   Name = File_5
   Address = 192.168.115.35
   SDPort = 9103
   Password = ""
   Device = DiskStorage
   Media Type = File
   Maximum Concurrent Jobs = 7
}

Storage {
   Name = File_20
   Address = 192.168.120.35  # N.B. Use a fully qualified name here
   SDPort = 9103
   Password = ""
   Device = DiskStorage
   Media Type = File
   Maximum Concurrent Jobs = 7
}

The problem has not been limited to a specific VLAN.
I've tried changing all of the Storage definitions to use the same IP 
wondering if Bacula was confused about which IP to send traffic out, to 
no avail.
I've tried turning on debugging, but got no output.

No idea what I'm missing here. What other info did I fail to provide?  
Any thoughts on what's going on?

Thanks,

-- 
Kevin B. Zimmerman
Kitware, Inc.
28 Corporate Drive
Clifton Park, NY 12065
kevin.zimmer...@kitware.com
http://www.kitware.com


--
LIMITED TIME SALE - Full Year of Microsoft Training For Just $49.99!
1,500+ hours of tutorials including VisualStudio 2012, Windows 8, SharePoint
2013

Re: [Bacula-users] Fatal error: Authorization key rejected by Storage daemon.

[Ana Emília M . Arruda]

Hi Kevin,

Just trying to understand... The error bellow:

Restore-public-Disk.2013-09-20_12.43.48_32 is waiting
for Client to connect to Storage daemon
...
20-Sep 12:19 public-fd JobId 19084: Fatal error: Authorization key rejected
by Storage daemon.
Please seehttp://www.bacula.org/rel-manual/faq.html#AuthorizationErrors  for
help.
20-Sep 12:19 public-fd JobId 19084: Fatal error: Failed to authenticate
Storage daemon.

It means that your client "public-fd" have problems to connect to storage
daemon. In the case, for the restore job, bacula is asking for:

Storage {
   Name = File_20
   Address = 192.168.120.35
...
}

So, probably, public-fd has network problems in communicating with
192.168.120.35...

Are you using the correct JobId for the restore? When you say that it
should ask for File_5 storage, maybe you are misunderstanding the JobId
information for the restore you want.

Best regards,
Ana





On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 2:09 PM, Kevin B. Zimmerman <
kevin.zimmer...@kitware.com> wrote:

> Greetings -
>
> I'm running Bacula 5.2.5 on an Ubuntu 12.04.3 server, with about 61TB of
> disk storage and an attached Dell PVTL2000 tape library. Backups are
> working great, but restores are presenting a problem.
>
> Here's my dilemma:
>
> When attempting to restore a file, I get this status for about 10 minutes:
>
>   JobId Level   Name   Status
> ==
>   19085 Restore-public-Disk.2013-09-20_12.43.48_32 is waiting
> for Client to connect to Storage daemon
>
> and then this error:
>
> 20-Sep 12:09 khq-backups2-dir JobId 19084: Start Restore Job
> Restore-public-Disk.2013-09-20_12.09.20_02
> 20-Sep 12:09 khq-backups2-dir JobId 19084: Using Device "DiskStorage"
> 20-Sep 12:19 public-fd JobId 19084: Fatal error: Authorization key
> rejected by Storage daemon.
> Please seehttp://www.bacula.org/rel-manual/faq.html#AuthorizationErrors for 
> help.
> 20-Sep 12:19 public-fd JobId 19084: Fatal error: Failed to authenticate
> Storage daemon.
> 20-Sep 12:19 khq-backups2-dir JobId 19084: Fatal error: Socket error on
> Storage command: ERR=No data available
> 20-Sep 12:19 khq-backups2-dir JobId 19084: Error: Bacula khq-backups2-dir
> 5.2.5 (26Jan12):
>Build OS:   x86_64-pc-linux-gnu ubuntu 12.04
>JobId:  19084
>Job:Restore-public-Disk.2013-09-20_12.09.20_02
>Restore Client: public-fd
>Start time: 20-Sep-2013 12:09:22
>End time:   20-Sep-2013 12:19:33
>Files Expected: 1
>Files Restored: 0
>Bytes Restored: 0
>Rate:   0.0 KB/s
>FD Errors:  1
>FD termination status:
>SD termination status:  Waiting on FD
>Termination:*** Restore Error ***
>
> 20-Sep 12:19 khq-backups2-dir JobId 19084: Error: Bacula khq-backups2-dir
> 5.2.5 (26Jan12):
>Build OS:   x86_64-pc-linux-gnu ubuntu 12.04
>JobId:  19084
>Job:Restore-public-Disk.2013-09-20_12.09.20_02
>Restore Client: public-fd
>Start time: 20-Sep-2013 12:09:22
>End time:   20-Sep-2013 12:19:33
>Files Expected: 1
>Files Restored: 0
>Bytes Restored: 0
>Rate:   0.0 KB/s
>FD Errors:  2
>FD termination status:
>SD termination status:  Waiting on FD
>Termination:*** Restore Error ***
>
> So I went to check out
> http://www.bacula.org/rel-manual/faq.html#AuthorizationErrors as
> suggested by the error, but it doesn't exist.  I looked at
>
> http://www.bacula.org/5.2.x-manuals/en/problems/problems/Bacula_Frequently_Asked_Que.html#SECTION0026
> presuming it to be the same, but it didn't help.
>
> I'm not sure why it fails on auth.  It uses the same password to run
> backups, and those work fine.
> I tested connectivity between the two systems, and both are able to talk
> to each other (port 9102 on client, ports 9102 & 9103 on each of the
> server's many IPs).
> Max Concurrent Jobs are set to 7 in all configs, and no other jobs are
> running.
>
> One thing I noticed was that after selecting the file(s) to restore, I
> get this:
>
> The job will require the following
> Volume(s) Storage(s)SD Device(s)
> ===
>
>  DiskPool0197  File_20   DiskStorage
>
> This particular client uses File_5, which may be part of the problem,
> though I don't understand why.  That volume (DiskPool0197) has backups
> from many different clients, from many different VLANs.
>
> Some relevant info:
>
> In trying to reduce network overhead, the backup server has been added
> to each of the VLANs where the Bacula clients reside, resulting in
> numerous file and tape storage definitions.  He

Re: [Bacula-users] USB tape drives?

[Greg Woods]

On Fri, 2013-09-20 at 12:17 -0600, Greg Woods wrote:
> On Tue, 2013-09-17 at 13:13 +0300, Guy wrote:
> > Yes I do this with vchanger... 
> 
> I've run into a wall trying to get vchanger to compile on Raspbian (a
> limited version of Debian for the Raspberry Pi).

I did solve the compile issue. With a lot more Googling (I really wish I
were better at searching for things), I did find the -dev packages. For
some unknown reason, they are not in the repository, I had to download
them manually and install them. When I did that and re-ran configure and
make, it does compile.

Now on to see if I can get it to work.

--Greg




--
LIMITED TIME SALE - Full Year of Microsoft Training For Just $49.99!
1,500+ hours of tutorials including VisualStudio 2012, Windows 8, SharePoint
2013, SQL 2012, MVC 4, more. BEST VALUE: New Multi-Library Power Pack includes
Mobile, Cloud, Java, and UX Design. Lowest price ever! Ends 9/20/13. 
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=58041151&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
___
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users

Re: [Bacula-users] USB tape drives?

[Josh Fisher]

On 9/20/2013 2:17 PM, Greg Woods wrote:

On Tue, 2013-09-17 at 13:13 +0300, Guy wrote:

Yes I do this with vchanger...

I've run into a wall trying to get vchanger to compile on Raspbian (a
limited version of Debian for the Raspberry Pi).

When I run configure, it notes that I do not have libuuid. I believe
this is correct; there is a shared library (.so) version, but there is
no development (.a) version. However, it still tries to use -luuid
anyway, and I get linker errors:

libtool: link: g++ -g -O2 -o vchanger vchanger-vchanger_common.o
vchanger-compat_util.o vchanger-junctions.o vchanger-uuidlookup.o
vchanger-util.o vchanger-vconf.o vchanger-loghandler.o
vchanger-diskchanger.o vchanger-changerstate.o vchanger-vchanger.o
-L/lib/arm-linux-gnueabihf -luuid -lblkid
/usr/bin/ld: cannot find -luuid
/usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lblkid
collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
make: *** [vchanger] Error 1

I tried manually editing the Makefile in the src directory to comment
out this line:

#vchanger_LDADD = -L/usr/local/lib -luuid -lblkid

I didn't really expect that to work, since manually editing Makefiles
produced by configure seldom does, and it didn't:

vchanger-uuidlookup.o: In function `GetMountpointFromUUID':
/usr/local/src/vchanger/src/uuidlookup.c:236: undefined reference to
`blkid_get_devname'
collect2: ld returned 1 exit status

Is there any hope of getting vchanger to compile? A set of configure
options that will prevent the linker errors, perhaps?


Yes. The quick and dirty way is to comment out the vchanger_LDADD line 
in the Makefile.am in the src directory and replace the uuidlookup.c 
file with a version having a single function as follows:


/* * uuidlookup.c ( to disable UUID lookups ) */ #include "config.h" 
#include  int GetMountpointFromUUID(char *mountp, size_t 
mountp_sz, const char *uuid_str)

{   /* Always fail as if for a system error */
return -1;
}

This uuidlookup.c will not call any libuuid or libblkid functions, and 
so prevent the attempt to link with those libraries. Of course, you must 
specify magazines by their mountpoint directories and never by UUID.


The other approach is to snag the libuuid and libblkid headers from the 
Rasbian source and manually put them in /usr/include before running 
configure. If the libraries are installed and haven't been patched too 
heavily from their Debian versions, then that may well work. I know 
nothing about Rasbian, so can't really say.





Thanks,
--Greg

P.S. It doesn't appear that -dev packages are available for these
libraries:

r# dpkg -l '*uuid*'
Desired=Unknown/Install/Remove/Purge/Hold
|
Status=Not/Inst/Conf-files/Unpacked/halF-conf/Half-inst/trig-aWait/Trig-pend
|/ Err?=(none)/Reinst-required (Status,Err: uppercase=bad)
||/ Name   Version  Architecture Description
+++-==---=
ii  libuuid1:armhf 2.20.1-5.3   armhfUniversally Unique ID
library
ii  uuid-runtime   2.20.1-5.3   armhfruntime components for the
Univer
root@bstore:/usr/local/src/vchanger# dkpg -l '*blkid*"

^C

root@bstore:/usr/local/src/vchanger# ^"^'
dkpg -l '*blkid*'
bash: dkpg: command not found
root@bstore:/usr/local/src/vchanger# dpkg -l '*blkid*'
Desired=Unknown/Install/Remove/Purge/Hold
|
Status=Not/Inst/Conf-files/Unpacked/halF-conf/Half-inst/trig-aWait/Trig-pend
|/ Err?=(none)/Reinst-required (Status,Err: uppercase=bad)
||/ Name   Version  Architecture Description
+++-==---=
ii  libblkid1:armh 2.20.1-5.3   armhfblock device id library



--
LIMITED TIME SALE - Full Year of Microsoft Training For Just $49.99!
1,500+ hours of tutorials including VisualStudio 2012, Windows 8, SharePoint
2013, SQL 2012, MVC 4, more. BEST VALUE: New Multi-Library Power Pack includes
Mobile, Cloud, Java, and UX Design. Lowest price ever! Ends 9/20/13.
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=58041151&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
___
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users


--
LIMITED TIME SALE - Full Year of Microsoft Training For Just $49.99!
1,500+ hours of tutorials including VisualStudio 2012, Windows 8, SharePoint
2013, SQL 2012, MVC 4, more. BEST VALUE: New Multi-Library Power Pack includes
Mobile, Cloud, Java, and UX Design. Lowest price ever! Ends 9/20/13. 
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=58041151&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk___
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users

Re: [Bacula-users] volume Labeling with Autochanger

[Steve Ellis]

I'm not an expert, but my guess would be that no, this won't affect which
drive will be used for backup--except to the extent that the tape in
question is left in that drive until the backup runs--my understanding is
that a mounted (& suitable) tape, in whichever drive, is preferred when
running a backup.

I assume that your library has more than one drive (or it wouldn't
prompt)--in general, you can receive more helpful responses if you let us
see at least part of your config (in this case especially the sd config).
 You can always anonymize the passwords & such.

-se


On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 12:57 PM, Deepak  wrote:

> Dear Team,
>
> While labeling a new volume My system is asking me to enter auto
> changer drive.
>
> See Below command output:
>
> *label barcodes slot=1 pool=pool1
> Automatically selected Catalog: catalog1
> Using Catalog "catalog1"
> The defined Storage resources are:
>   1: File
>   2: Autochanger
> Select Storage resource (1-2): 2
> Enter autochanger drive[0]:
>
>
>
> Please tell me, Is this "Enter autochanger drive[0]:" option in anyhow
> is related to backup/restore job(will this selection plays any role in
> selecting drive used while job execution?).
>
>
> Thanks in advance...!
>
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> LIMITED TIME SALE - Full Year of Microsoft Training For Just $49.99!
> 1,500+ hours of tutorials including VisualStudio 2012, Windows 8,
> SharePoint
> 2013, SQL 2012, MVC 4, more. BEST VALUE: New Multi-Library Power Pack
> includes
> Mobile, Cloud, Java, and UX Design. Lowest price ever! Ends 9/20/13.
> http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=58041151&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
> ___
> Bacula-users mailing list
> Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
>



-- 

They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety
deserve neither liberty nor safety.

   --Benjamin Franklin, 1759
--
LIMITED TIME SALE - Full Year of Microsoft Training For Just $49.99!
1,500+ hours of tutorials including VisualStudio 2012, Windows 8, SharePoint
2013, SQL 2012, MVC 4, more. BEST VALUE: New Multi-Library Power Pack includes
Mobile, Cloud, Java, and UX Design. Lowest price ever! Ends 9/20/13. 
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=58041151&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk___
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users

[Bacula-users] volume Labeling with Autochanger

[Deepak]

Dear Team,

While labeling a new volume My system is asking me to enter auto  
changer drive.

See Below command output:

*label barcodes slot=1 pool=pool1
Automatically selected Catalog: catalog1
Using Catalog "catalog1"
The defined Storage resources are:
  1: File
  2: Autochanger
Select Storage resource (1-2): 2
Enter autochanger drive[0]:



Please tell me, Is this "Enter autochanger drive[0]:" option in anyhow  
is related to backup/restore job(will this selection plays any role in  
selecting drive used while job execution?).


Thanks in advance...!





--
LIMITED TIME SALE - Full Year of Microsoft Training For Just $49.99!
1,500+ hours of tutorials including VisualStudio 2012, Windows 8, SharePoint
2013, SQL 2012, MVC 4, more. BEST VALUE: New Multi-Library Power Pack includes
Mobile, Cloud, Java, and UX Design. Lowest price ever! Ends 9/20/13. 
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=58041151&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
___
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users

Re: [Bacula-users] USB tape drives?

[Greg Woods]

On Tue, 2013-09-17 at 13:13 +0300, Guy wrote:
> Yes I do this with vchanger... 

I've run into a wall trying to get vchanger to compile on Raspbian (a
limited version of Debian for the Raspberry Pi).

When I run configure, it notes that I do not have libuuid. I believe
this is correct; there is a shared library (.so) version, but there is
no development (.a) version. However, it still tries to use -luuid
anyway, and I get linker errors:

libtool: link: g++ -g -O2 -o vchanger vchanger-vchanger_common.o
vchanger-compat_util.o vchanger-junctions.o vchanger-uuidlookup.o
vchanger-util.o vchanger-vconf.o vchanger-loghandler.o
vchanger-diskchanger.o vchanger-changerstate.o vchanger-vchanger.o
-L/lib/arm-linux-gnueabihf -luuid -lblkid
/usr/bin/ld: cannot find -luuid
/usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lblkid
collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
make: *** [vchanger] Error 1

I tried manually editing the Makefile in the src directory to comment
out this line:

#vchanger_LDADD = -L/usr/local/lib -luuid -lblkid

I didn't really expect that to work, since manually editing Makefiles
produced by configure seldom does, and it didn't:

vchanger-uuidlookup.o: In function `GetMountpointFromUUID':
/usr/local/src/vchanger/src/uuidlookup.c:236: undefined reference to
`blkid_get_devname'
collect2: ld returned 1 exit status

Is there any hope of getting vchanger to compile? A set of configure
options that will prevent the linker errors, perhaps?

Thanks,
--Greg

P.S. It doesn't appear that -dev packages are available for these
libraries:

r# dpkg -l '*uuid*'
Desired=Unknown/Install/Remove/Purge/Hold
|
Status=Not/Inst/Conf-files/Unpacked/halF-conf/Half-inst/trig-aWait/Trig-pend
|/ Err?=(none)/Reinst-required (Status,Err: uppercase=bad)
||/ Name   Version  Architecture Description
+++-==---=
ii  libuuid1:armhf 2.20.1-5.3   armhfUniversally Unique ID
library
ii  uuid-runtime   2.20.1-5.3   armhfruntime components for the
Univer
root@bstore:/usr/local/src/vchanger# dkpg -l '*blkid*"
> ^C
root@bstore:/usr/local/src/vchanger# ^"^'
dkpg -l '*blkid*'
bash: dkpg: command not found
root@bstore:/usr/local/src/vchanger# dpkg -l '*blkid*'
Desired=Unknown/Install/Remove/Purge/Hold
|
Status=Not/Inst/Conf-files/Unpacked/halF-conf/Half-inst/trig-aWait/Trig-pend
|/ Err?=(none)/Reinst-required (Status,Err: uppercase=bad)
||/ Name   Version  Architecture Description
+++-==---=
ii  libblkid1:armh 2.20.1-5.3   armhfblock device id library



--
LIMITED TIME SALE - Full Year of Microsoft Training For Just $49.99!
1,500+ hours of tutorials including VisualStudio 2012, Windows 8, SharePoint
2013, SQL 2012, MVC 4, more. BEST VALUE: New Multi-Library Power Pack includes
Mobile, Cloud, Java, and UX Design. Lowest price ever! Ends 9/20/13. 
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=58041151&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
___
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users

[Bacula-users] upgrading bacula from one server to an entirely different pi

[jaredk51]

Thanks for the reply Uwe, when you mention "upgrade bacula tables"
scripts, are these scripts that can be found within the compiled bacula 
software itself?

Thanks

+--
|This was sent by jkel...@popcap.com via Backup Central.
|Forward SPAM to ab...@backupcentral.com.
+--



--
LIMITED TIME SALE - Full Year of Microsoft Training For Just $49.99!
1,500+ hours of tutorials including VisualStudio 2012, Windows 8, SharePoint
2013, SQL 2012, MVC 4, more. BEST VALUE: New Multi-Library Power Pack includes
Mobile, Cloud, Java, and UX Design. Lowest price ever! Ends 9/20/13. 
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=58041151&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
___
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users

[Bacula-users] vchanger

[Greg Woods]

I'm having some trouble getting vchanger to work, partly because the
documentation that comes with it seems not to be up to date. For
instance, the keywords described in the howto HTML file that comes with
the source are invalid keywords. The example config file has the right
keywords, but I'm having difficulty getting vchanger to work. 

When I get to testing vchanger, the list command works; it shows there
are 34 slots. But "label barcodes" appears not to work correctly:

*label barcodes
Automatically selected Catalog: GregAndEva
Using Catalog "GregAndEva"
The defined Storage resources are:
 1: BKUP
 2: ARCH
Select Storage resource (1-2): 2
Enter autochanger drive[0]: 
Connecting to Storage daemon ARCH at bstore.gregandeva.net:9103 ...
3306 Issuing autochanger "slots" command.
Device "ARCH" has 34 slots.
Connecting to Storage daemon ARCH at bstore.gregandeva.net:9103 ...
3306 Issuing autochanger "list" command.
No Volumes found to label, or no barcodes.
*

The inserted magazine disk does automount correctly, but there isn't
anything there except the lost+found directory. Nothing in the
documentation tells me how the index file is created or the
one-file-per-slot files or what name those files should have or if I am
supposed to create them myself or if vchanger is supposed to create them
and if so, how.

Is there any up-to-date documentation that explains how to set up and
configure vchanger? Is there something obvious that I have done wrong? I
can post the relevant parts of the config files if necessary.

Thanks,
--Greg



--
LIMITED TIME SALE - Full Year of Microsoft Training For Just $49.99!
1,500+ hours of tutorials including VisualStudio 2012, Windows 8, SharePoint
2013, SQL 2012, MVC 4, more. BEST VALUE: New Multi-Library Power Pack includes
Mobile, Cloud, Java, and UX Design. Lowest price ever! Ends 9/22/13. 
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=64545871&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
___
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users