[Bacula-users] configuration question: IPs and hostnames

2015-07-13 Thread Florian Schnabel
Hi,

I got a bacula setup running for several years now, sadly I hit a snag
and was hoping someone here can help me.
The setup is as follows:

* bacula-director and bacula-sd running on one box (v. 5.2.6, Debian wheezy)
* several bacula-sd (v. 5.2.6, Debian wheezy)
* one bacula-sd (v. 5.2.6, Debian jessie) (- this is the box i'm
currently making my changes to)

I doubt the versions do matter but for the sake of completion .. :-)

Now I'm in the middle of the painfull process of migration to different
IPs (from 192.168.0.0/24 to 10.0.0.0/8) and got a LAN and DMZ area too
as to make things anything but simple.

I'm trying to use hostnames everywhere now so I changed the Storage
definition for bacula-director to a FQN (host.domain.com) that is
resolvably at least for my servers. Now the bacula-director got two IPs
.. one in the old segment, one in the new. The main bunch of the
bacula-sd still got old IPs and connect to the director/storage on the
old IP. For one bacula-sd I tried switching over to the new IP (only, no
dual IP there) but then bacula won't work anymore. According to the
error message it tried sending the backup to the bacula-fd on the OLD
IP, even though on the box the hostname resolves correctly to the new IP
it SHOULD use.

I got the sneaking suspicion the hostname on the configuration gets
resolved on the director, not the sd and is wrong. Is there any way
around that? For the migration I need to be able to switch one box after
the other to the new IPs, there are a buckload of internal services on
there that i can't possibly all reconfigure at once ...

Any help would be appreciated.


Florian


--
Don't Limit Your Business. Reach for the Cloud.
GigeNET's Cloud Solutions provide you with the tools and support that
you need to offload your IT needs and focus on growing your business.
Configured For All Businesses. Start Your Cloud Today.
https://www.gigenetcloud.com/
___
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users


[Bacula-users] Back error only in one machine

2015-07-13 Thread Iban Cabrillo
Hi,
  I do not really understand why this back is failing (this is the only
back that never works), I have other machines in the same configuration
(bacula is in internal network and it makes the back through a firewall
port forwarding) and so many other on the same internal network.

ii  bacula
5.2.6+dfsg-5ubuntu1all  network backup service
- metapackage
ii  bacula-client
5.2.6+dfsg-5ubuntu1all  network backup service
- client metapackage
ii  bacula-common
5.2.6+dfsg-5ubuntu1amd64network backup service
- common support files
ii  bacula-common-mysql
5.2.6+dfsg-5ubuntu1amd64network backup service
- MySQL common files
ii  bacula-console
5.2.6+dfsg-5ubuntu1amd64network backup service
- text console
ii  bacula-director-common
5.2.6+dfsg-5ubuntu1amd64network backup service
- Director common files
ii  bacula-director-mysql
5.2.6+dfsg-5ubuntu1amd64network backup service
- MySQL storage for Director
ii  bacula-fd
5.2.6+dfsg-5ubuntu1amd64network backup service
- file daemon
ii  bacula-sd
5.2.6+dfsg-5ubuntu1amd64network backup service
- storage daemon
ii  bacula-sd-mysql
5.2.6+dfsg-5ubuntu1amd64network backup service
- MySQL SD tools
ii  bacula-server
5.2.6+dfsg-5ubuntu1all  network backup service
- server metapackage
ii  bacula-traymonitor
5.2.6+dfsg-5ubuntu1amd64network backup service
- tray monitor

  The bacula back process start well, and asking the clients status
everything seems to be OK:

*status client=ibergrid-voms-fd
Connecting to Client ibergrid-voms-fd at ibergrid-voms.ifca.es:9102

ibergrid-voms-fd Version: 5.0.0 (26 January 2010)  x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu
redhat (Carbon)
Daemon started 10-Jul-15 13:32, 9 Jobs run since started.
 Heap: heap=135,168 smbytes=91,924 max_bytes=794,880 bufs=97 max_bufs=502
 Sizeof: boffset_t=8 size_t=8 debug=0 trace=0

Running Jobs:
Director connected at: 13-Jul-15 10:32
No Jobs running.


Terminated Jobs:
 JobId  LevelFiles  Bytes   Status   FinishedName
==
 16498  Full137,0461.624 G  OK   10-Jul-15 05:48
BackIbergrid-voms
 16516  Full137,0451.231 G  OK   10-Jul-15 13:42
BackIbergrid-voms
 16516  Full137,0451.231 G  OK   10-Jul-15 16:43
BackIbergrid-voms
 16524  Full137,0451.231 G  OK   10-Jul-15 19:06
BackIbergrid-voms
 16524  Full137,0451.231 G  OK   10-Jul-15 22:06
BackIbergrid-voms
 16546  Full137,0561.231 G  OK   11-Jul-15 18:30
BackIbergrid-voms
 16546  Full137,0561.231 G  OK   11-Jul-15 21:32
BackIbergrid-voms
 16566  Full137,0671.231 G  OK   12-Jul-15 16:37
BackIbergrid-voms
 16566  Full137,0671.225 G  OK   12-Jul-15 19:38
BackIbergrid-voms
 16580  Full137,0781.226 G  OK   13-Jul-15 10:11
BackIbergrid-voms


I do spooldata = yes




*13-Jul 10:11 bacula-sd JobId 16580: Job write elapsed time = 00:10:41,
Transfer rate = 1.942 M Bytes/second13-Jul 10:11 bacula-sd JobId 16580:
Committing spooled data to Volume L30006L3. Despooling 1,249,398,751
bytes ...13-Jul 10:12 bacula-sd JobId 16580: Despooling elapsed time =
00:00:30, Transfer rate = 41.64 M Bytes/second13-Jul 10:12 bacula-sd JobId
16580: Sending spooled attrs to the Director. Despooling 31,611,415 bytes
...*


While the client say that the job has ended correctly the diector see this
still running:








*Running Jobs:Console connected at 13-Jul-15 10:18 JobId Level
Name
Status==
16580
FullBackIbergrid-voms.2015-07-13_10.01.02_03 is running*














*The storage deamon sees the jobs end ok:*status storage=TSM3500-LTO3
Connecting to Storage daemon TSM3500-LTO3 at bacula.ifca.es:9103
http://bacula.ifca.es:9103bacula-sd Version: 5.2.6 (21 February 2012)
x86_64-pc-linux-gnu ubuntu 12.10Daemon started 07-May-15 13:54. Jobs:
run=1611, running=0. Heap: heap=270,336 smbytes=1,093,786
max_bytes=2,185,198 bufs=144 max_bufs=191 Sizes: boffset_t=8 size_t=8
int32_t=4 int64_t=8 mode=0,0Running Jobs:No Jobs running.*





















*Jobs waiting to reserve a drive:Terminated Jobs: JobId  Level
Files  Bytes   Status   FinishedName
===...
16580
Full137,0781.245 G  OK   13-Jul-15 10:12
BackIbergrid-vomsDevice status:Autochanger TSM3500 with devices:
ULT3580-TD3 (/dev/nst1)   ULT3580-TD5 (/dev/nst0)Device FileStorage
(/data/Bacula/Default) is not open.Device ULT3580-TD3 (/dev/nst1) is
mounted with:Volume:  L30006L3Pool:FullMedia type:
LTO-3Slot 7 is loaded in drive 1.

[Bacula-users] Replacement server fails with some clients

2015-07-13 Thread Gary Stainburn
Hi all,

I'm replacing a old (Fedora 14) server with a Centos 7 one. I've copied 
the /etc/bacula/bacula-[sf]d.conf files and everything looks fine.

Both the client and storage services are running and talk to the director 
without problems. However, some of the clients fail to connect with the 
storage server when running a backup job. The error message I get is related 
to authentication. However, the clients have not been changed, and the server 
talks to the director.

I'm initial guess was that this is probably a version problem as the old F14 
server was running 5.0.3 RPMs and the C7 server is running 5.2.13

My director is also 5.2.13.  My director server is also my main storage 
server, which kind of cancels that idea, as most clients back up to this 
server.

Most of my other storage servers are 5.0.3 (one is 5.0.0)

The vast majority of my clients are Win7 running bacula-win64 5.2.10

One of the things that's surprised me about looking into this problem is that 
a recently built and yum -y update Fedora 21 box is running 7.0.5. Not sure 
why that is. This is one of the clients who are failing with the new storage 
server.


It may be that the other (Win7) clients are also running 5.0.x. Despite my 
comments above, does this still look like it could be the issue? If so, 
what's the best / easiest way to upgrade the Fedora 21 to 5.2.x RPMs?

The log for one of these jobs is below.


13-Jul 13:49 eddie1-dir JobId 124118: Prior failed job found in catalog. 
Upgrading to Full.
13-Jul 13:49 eddie1-dir JobId 124118: shell command: run 
BeforeJob /etc/bacula/jobcheck.sh eddienew-fd
13-Jul 13:49 eddie1-dir JobId 124118: BeforeJob: PING 10.1.1.226 (10.1.1.226) 
56(84) bytes of data.
13-Jul 13:49 eddie1-dir JobId 124118: BeforeJob: 64 bytes from 10.1.1.226: 
icmp_seq=1 ttl=64 time=0.109 ms
13-Jul 13:49 eddie1-dir JobId 124118: BeforeJob: 
13-Jul 13:49 eddie1-dir JobId 124118: BeforeJob: --- 10.1.1.226 ping 
statistics ---
13-Jul 13:49 eddie1-dir JobId 124118: BeforeJob: 1 packets transmitted, 1 
received, 0% packet loss, time 0ms
13-Jul 13:49 eddie1-dir JobId 124118: BeforeJob: rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 
0.109/0.109/0.109/0.000 ms
13-Jul 13:49 eddie1-dir JobId 124118: Start Backup JobId 124118, 
Job=eddienew.2015-07-13_13.49.33_58
13-Jul 13:49 eddie1-dir JobId 124118: Using Device ChicoStorage to write.
13-Jul 13:49 eddienew-fd JobId 124118: Fatal error: Authorization key rejected 
by Storage daemon.
Please see 
http://www.bacula.org/en/rel-manual/Bacula_Freque_Asked_Questi.html#SECTION0026
 
for help.
13-Jul 13:49 eddie1-dir JobId 124118: Fatal error: Bad response to Storage 
command: wanted 2000 OK storage
, got 2902 Bad storage

13-Jul 13:49 eddie1-dir JobId 124118: Error: Bacula eddie1-dir 5.2.13 
(19Jan13):
  Build OS:   x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu redhat Cat)
  JobId:  124118
  Job:eddienew.2015-07-13_13.49.33_58
  Backup Level:   Full (upgraded from Incremental)
  Client: eddienew-fd 7.0.5 (28Jul14) 
x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu,redhat,One)
  FileSet:Linux Full 2012-08-13 19:05:00
  Pool:   chico (From Job resource)
  Catalog:MyCatalog (From Client resource)
  Storage:chico-chico (From Job resource)
  Scheduled time: 13-Jul-2015 13:49:33
  Start time: 13-Jul-2015 13:49:38
  End time:   13-Jul-2015 13:49:50
  Elapsed time:   12 secs
  Priority:   7
  FD Files Written:   0
  SD Files Written:   0
  FD Bytes Written:   0 (0 B)
  SD Bytes Written:   0 (0 B)
  Rate:   0.0 KB/s
  Software Compression:   None
  VSS:no
  Encryption: no
  Accurate:   no
  Volume name(s): 
  Volume Session Id:  896
  Volume Session Time:1436082818
  Last Volume Bytes:  208,677,550 (208.6 MB)
  Non-fatal FD errors:2
  SD Errors:  0
  FD termination status:  Error
  SD termination status:  Waiting on FD
  Termination:*** Backup Error ***


--
Don't Limit Your Business. Reach for the Cloud.
GigeNET's Cloud Solutions provide you with the tools and support that
you need to offload your IT needs and focus on growing your business.
Configured For All Businesses. Start Your Cloud Today.
https://www.gigenetcloud.com/
___
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users


Re: [Bacula-users] Replacement server fails with some clients

2015-07-13 Thread Ana Emília M . Arruda
Hello Gary,

If your director is running 5.2.13, you should have all your storage
daemons in this version too. Also If you have a client in the director
host, this client should be the same version of director. About your client
problems, you should have your client versions at most equal to director
version, not greater than.

Best regards,
Ana

On Mon, Jul 13, 2015 at 10:05 AM, Gary Stainburn g...@ringways.co.uk
wrote:

 Hi all,

 I'm replacing a old (Fedora 14) server with a Centos 7 one. I've copied
 the /etc/bacula/bacula-[sf]d.conf files and everything looks fine.

 Both the client and storage services are running and talk to the director
 without problems. However, some of the clients fail to connect with the
 storage server when running a backup job. The error message I get is
 related
 to authentication. However, the clients have not been changed, and the
 server
 talks to the director.

 I'm initial guess was that this is probably a version problem as the old
 F14
 server was running 5.0.3 RPMs and the C7 server is running 5.2.13

 My director is also 5.2.13.  My director server is also my main storage
 server, which kind of cancels that idea, as most clients back up to this
 server.

 Most of my other storage servers are 5.0.3 (one is 5.0.0)

 The vast majority of my clients are Win7 running bacula-win64 5.2.10

 One of the things that's surprised me about looking into this problem is
 that
 a recently built and yum -y update Fedora 21 box is running 7.0.5. Not
 sure
 why that is. This is one of the clients who are failing with the new
 storage
 server.


 It may be that the other (Win7) clients are also running 5.0.x. Despite my
 comments above, does this still look like it could be the issue? If so,
 what's the best / easiest way to upgrade the Fedora 21 to 5.2.x RPMs?

 The log for one of these jobs is below.


 13-Jul 13:49 eddie1-dir JobId 124118: Prior failed job found in catalog.
 Upgrading to Full.
 13-Jul 13:49 eddie1-dir JobId 124118: shell command: run
 BeforeJob /etc/bacula/jobcheck.sh eddienew-fd
 13-Jul 13:49 eddie1-dir JobId 124118: BeforeJob: PING 10.1.1.226
 (10.1.1.226)
 56(84) bytes of data.
 13-Jul 13:49 eddie1-dir JobId 124118: BeforeJob: 64 bytes from 10.1.1.226:
 icmp_seq=1 ttl=64 time=0.109 ms
 13-Jul 13:49 eddie1-dir JobId 124118: BeforeJob:
 13-Jul 13:49 eddie1-dir JobId 124118: BeforeJob: --- 10.1.1.226 ping
 statistics ---
 13-Jul 13:49 eddie1-dir JobId 124118: BeforeJob: 1 packets transmitted, 1
 received, 0% packet loss, time 0ms
 13-Jul 13:49 eddie1-dir JobId 124118: BeforeJob: rtt min/avg/max/mdev =
 0.109/0.109/0.109/0.000 ms
 13-Jul 13:49 eddie1-dir JobId 124118: Start Backup JobId 124118,
 Job=eddienew.2015-07-13_13.49.33_58
 13-Jul 13:49 eddie1-dir JobId 124118: Using Device ChicoStorage to write.
 13-Jul 13:49 eddienew-fd JobId 124118: Fatal error: Authorization key
 rejected
 by Storage daemon.
 Please see

 http://www.bacula.org/en/rel-manual/Bacula_Freque_Asked_Questi.html#SECTION0026
 for help.
 13-Jul 13:49 eddie1-dir JobId 124118: Fatal error: Bad response to Storage
 command: wanted 2000 OK storage
 , got 2902 Bad storage

 13-Jul 13:49 eddie1-dir JobId 124118: Error: Bacula eddie1-dir 5.2.13
 (19Jan13):
   Build OS:   x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu redhat Cat)
   JobId:  124118
   Job:eddienew.2015-07-13_13.49.33_58
   Backup Level:   Full (upgraded from Incremental)
   Client: eddienew-fd 7.0.5 (28Jul14)
 x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu,redhat,One)
   FileSet:Linux Full 2012-08-13 19:05:00
   Pool:   chico (From Job resource)
   Catalog:MyCatalog (From Client resource)
   Storage:chico-chico (From Job resource)
   Scheduled time: 13-Jul-2015 13:49:33
   Start time: 13-Jul-2015 13:49:38
   End time:   13-Jul-2015 13:49:50
   Elapsed time:   12 secs
   Priority:   7
   FD Files Written:   0
   SD Files Written:   0
   FD Bytes Written:   0 (0 B)
   SD Bytes Written:   0 (0 B)
   Rate:   0.0 KB/s
   Software Compression:   None
   VSS:no
   Encryption: no
   Accurate:   no
   Volume name(s):
   Volume Session Id:  896
   Volume Session Time:1436082818
   Last Volume Bytes:  208,677,550 (208.6 MB)
   Non-fatal FD errors:2
   SD Errors:  0
   FD termination status:  Error
   SD termination status:  Waiting on FD
   Termination:*** Backup Error ***



 --
 Don't Limit Your Business. Reach for the Cloud.
 GigeNET's Cloud Solutions provide you with the tools and support that
 you need to offload your IT needs and focus on growing your business.
 Configured For All Businesses. Start Your Cloud Today.
 https://www.gigenetcloud.com/
 ___
 

Re: [Bacula-users] configuration question: IPs and hostnames

2015-07-13 Thread Josh Fisher

On 7/13/2015 8:29 AM, Florian Schnabel wrote:

 I'm trying to use hostnames everywhere now so I changed the Storage
 definition for bacula-director to a FQN (host.domain.com) that is
 resolvably at least for my servers. Now the bacula-director got two IPs
 .. one in the old segment, one in the new. The main bunch of the
 bacula-sd still got old IPs and connect to the director/storage on the
 old IP. For one bacula-sd I tried switching over to the new IP (only, no
 dual IP there) but then bacula won't work anymore. According to the
 error message it tried sending the backup to the bacula-fd on the OLD
 IP, even though on the box the hostname resolves correctly to the new IP
 it SHOULD use.

Don't switch to using hostnames until after the switch. Even if the 
clients are using IPs, the Dir will tell the client to connect to the SD 
at some.host.name and the client will/may get the wrong IP for the SD.



--
Don't Limit Your Business. Reach for the Cloud.
GigeNET's Cloud Solutions provide you with the tools and support that
you need to offload your IT needs and focus on growing your business.
Configured For All Businesses. Start Your Cloud Today.
https://www.gigenetcloud.com/
___
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users


Re: [Bacula-users] Back error only in one machine

2015-07-13 Thread Heitor Faria
 *messages

 13-Jul 12:01 bacula-dir JobId 16580: Fatal error: Network error with FD during
 Backup: ERR=Connection reset by peer
 13-Jul 12:01 bacula-dir JobId 16580: Fatal error: No Job status returned from
 FD.
 13-Jul 12:01 bacula-dir JobId 16580: Error: Bacula bacula-dir 5.2.6 (21Feb12):
 Build OS: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu ubuntu 12.10
 JobId: 16580
 Job: BackIbergrid-voms.2015-07-13_10.01.02_03
 Backup Level: Full
 Client: ibergrid-voms-fd 5.0.0 (26Jan10)
 x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu,redhat,(Carbon)

Hello Iban: could you please upgrade your client to a 5.2.x version and try 
again? 
Even though Director version may be bigger than clients one it's advisable not 
to abuse of Bacula daemons compatibility matrix. 

Regards, 
=== 
Heitor Medrado de Faria - LPIC-III | ITIL-F | Bacula Systems Certified 
Administrator II 
29 de junho a 13 de julho: Treinamento Telepresencial Bacula: 
http://www.bacula.com.br/?p=2174 
61 8268-4220 
Site: www.bacula.com.br | Facebook: heitor.faria 
 
--
Don't Limit Your Business. Reach for the Cloud.
GigeNET's Cloud Solutions provide you with the tools and support that
you need to offload your IT needs and focus on growing your business.
Configured For All Businesses. Start Your Cloud Today.
https://www.gigenetcloud.com/___
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users


Re: [Bacula-users] Replacement server fails with some clients

2015-07-13 Thread Gary Stainburn
Hi Ana

Thank you for this.  However, initialy the opposite seems to have been the 
case. The storage daemons at 5.0.x were working fine, while the one at 5.2.13 
was not. However, changing the client has fixed this specific client.

While looking into this, and trying to find out how to install 5.2.x RPM's 
onto my Fedora 21 file and print server I found references to Bareos.  This 
is something I was totally unaware of.

I have followed the instructions to install the bareos repo and have installed 
the bareos-client.  Having turned 'compatibilty = yes' on I can now 
successfully back up this server.

While I'm not sure how I should proceed long term, it does seem to have solved 
this problem.  What I don't understand is why *very* old boxes running Fedora 
9 and 2.4.x clients back up and work fine, while newer Fedora 21 / 5.0.x 
clients fail.

Gary

On Monday 13 July 2015 15:35:26 Ana Emília M. Arruda wrote:
 Hello Gary,

 If your director is running 5.2.13, you should have all your storage
 daemons in this version too. Also If you have a client in the director
 host, this client should be the same version of director. About your client
 problems, you should have your client versions at most equal to director
 version, not greater than.

 Best regards,
 Ana


--
Don't Limit Your Business. Reach for the Cloud.
GigeNET's Cloud Solutions provide you with the tools and support that
you need to offload your IT needs and focus on growing your business.
Configured For All Businesses. Start Your Cloud Today.
https://www.gigenetcloud.com/
___
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users