[Bacula-users] Can Virtualfull use basejobs ?
Hello Everyone,
I have made some jobs using a progressive schema and that is running fine,
but because the big space and time wasted I'm trying to implement a base
job in this routine but apparently my basejob is completely ignored.
Someone knows if both resources are incompatible or there is some tips to
do then work together?
Regards,
Those are my jobs conf:
JobDefs {
Name = "J-default-linux"
Type = Backup
Level = Incremental
FileSet = "Linux-Default"
Schedule = "Semanal1"
Messages = Standard
Pool = Diario
Full Backup Pool = Mensal
Differential Backup Pool = Semanal
Incremental Backup Pool = Diario
SpoolAttributes = yes
Priority = 9
Write Bootstrap = "/opt/bacula/bsr/%c.bsr"
Accurate = Yes
Allow Duplicate Jobs = no
Cancel Queued Duplicates = yes
}
Job {
Name = "J015666-job"
Client = "J015666-fd"
JobDefs = J-default-linux
Level = Incremental
Base = "J015666-basejob","J015666-job"
Pool = Geral
Incremental Backup Pool = Geral
Differential Backup Pool = Geral
Full Backup Pool = Arquivamento
Virtual Full Backup Pool = Arquivamento
Schedule = "Progressivo"
Backups To Keep = 10
Delete Consolidated Jobs = Yes
}
Job {
Name = "J015666-basejob"
Client = "J015666-fd"
JobDefs = J-default-linux
Level = Base
Pool = Arquivamento
}
--
Welington Rodrigues Braga
--
Web: http://www.welrbraga.eti.br
Gtalk: welrbraga[*]gmail·com
Yahoo / Skype: welrbraga
PGP Key: 0x6C7654EB
Linux User #253605
"Em tudo somos atribulados, porém não angustiados; perplexos, porém não
desanimados; perseguidos, porém não desamparados; abatidos, porém não
destruídos;" - 2Co 4:8,9
___
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula SD on a QNAP TS-231
Hi Andrea and others, I'm just a beginner in Bacula but I'm talking as who manager 4 QNAP NAS (1x TS-859U+, 3x TS-459U+) and others 2 similar storage like these in the last 6 years. So, if you let me give a humble opinion, configure only a NFS access and share this in your director/storage daemon and disable all the services and apps you will not use. The reasons are: 1st - It is the most simple protocol to configure and use in Linux Machine; 2nd - ISCSI is a most but, in this storage, when you create a LUN in fact it creates some big files mounted as loop devices, so, any problem in your machine means double problem to restore data, reduced performance of the box (compared with NFS it the same machine) and after some days (maybe months) of use this files will increase till the limit of storage and you start to receive alerts of disk-full 4th - As said, you have to maintain the same version of SD and DIR. Compile or look for packages for Linux is easier than to a proprietary NAS. Of course, it is based in my experience with these machines, and can not reflect the reality of your case. Regards, Em sex, 12 de out de 2018 às 09:52, Andrea Venturoli escreveu: > Hello. > > I know this question (more or less) came up several times in the past, > but possibly things have changed a lot. > > Is there any way I could install bacula storage daemon on the NAS in > subject? > There seems to be no QPKG available. > IPKG apparently disappeared. > I tried compiling it directly on the NAS, but there's no tools. > Is cross compiling the only way? Any tutorial then? > > Of course I could use NFS, but I'd *REALLY* like to avoid it. > > bye & Thanks > av. > > > ___ > Bacula-users mailing list > Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users > -- Welington Rodrigues Braga -- Web: http://www.welrbraga.eti.br Gtalk: welrbraga[*]gmail·com Yahoo / Skype: welrbraga PGP Key: 0x6C7654EB Linux User #253605 "Em tudo somos atribulados, porém não angustiados; perplexos, porém não desanimados; perseguidos, porém não desamparados; abatidos, porém não destruídos;" - 2Co 4:8,9 ___ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula 9 and clients 5
Thanks your attention Sven, I've just configured more dozens Bacula client 5.x to run against my Bacula director 9.x. Just to register, if someone have the same difficult, the problem - in my case - was that the default configuration in Bacula-fd 5.x has a line "FDAddress = 127.0.0.1". After comment this line and restart the client I could connect both, server and client, and then run my backups without any other problem. Regards, Em sáb, 6 de out de 2018 às 13:48, Sven Hartge escreveu: > On 10/6/18 5:42 PM, Welington R. Braga wrote: > > > Can anyone the same scenery to help me? > > Older versions of the FD will always work with newer SDs and DIRs, so > you will be fine. > > Some special features do not work with older FDs but backup and restore > will work in all cases. > > Grüße, > Sven. > > ___ > Bacula-users mailing list > Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users > -- Welington Rodrigues Braga -- Web: http://www.welrbraga.eti.br Gtalk: welrbraga[*]gmail·com Yahoo / Skype: welrbraga PGP Key: 0x6C7654EB Linux User #253605 "Em tudo somos atribulados, porém não angustiados; perplexos, porém não desanimados; perseguidos, porém não desamparados; abatidos, porém não destruídos;" - 2Co 4:8,9 ___ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
[Bacula-users] Bacula 9 and clients 5
Hi Gentlemen and ladies, Some days ago I've installed the packages of Bacula 9.0.8 with PostgreSQL in a Debian 9 machine initially connected to a 25TB NAS as a substitute for my old backup system with BackupPC (Rsync based). Immediately I started a successful backup routine of about 50 VMs running the most different versions of Debian and Ubuntu but I have some old clients that I couldn't find a 9.x package of bacula-fd, yet. So the doubt is: Can I use these clients on my Bacula server 9.0.8? I decided to use this version (9.0.8), instead of most recent (9.2.1) because after a search on the Community repository I concluded that this version is what most support Ubuntu and Debian versions, but now I have approximately 20 outdated machines that I can't update their OS and the only bacula-fd version available is 5.x.x (specifically talking: Ubuntu Precise, Ubuntu Wily and Debian Squeeze). I've tried to force a use of these client version but without success. When I ask for "status client" on "bconsole", the message were about the impossibility of a connection. The configuration of new and old clients are the same, there is no firewall or any restriction to client and server talking to each other but unfortunately not work. I've looked for difference between format, protocols etc between 5.x and 9.x but I found nothing about this (probably I did a bad search). Looking here in forum archive I found some suggestion about success with new server and old client but in long time ago (server 3.x and client 2.x or some like that). Nothing more recent. If I can't put the clients in my Bacula 9, the solution I've thinking is install a second backup server running a old Bacula version exclusive to backup these machines. The problem of this solution is have to maintain two backup servers duplicating my efforts to keep all up and running, unecessarily. Can anyone the same scenery to help me? Regards -- Welington Rodrigues Braga -- Web: http://www.welrbraga.eti.br Gtalk: welrbraga[*]gmail·com Yahoo / Skype: welrbraga PGP Key: 0x6C7654EB Linux User #253605 "Em tudo somos atribulados, porém não angustiados; perplexos, porém não desanimados; perseguidos, porém não desamparados; abatidos, porém não destruídos;" - 2Co 4:8,9 ___ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
