Re: [Bacula-users] Cannot compile on Ubuntu

2007-02-16 Thread Kern Sibbald
Good idea, thanks.

On Friday 16 February 2007 22:07, Ryan Novosielski wrote:
> Kern Sibbald wrote:
> > On Friday 16 February 2007 20:58, Ryan Novosielski wrote:
> >> Kern Sibbald wrote:
> >>> On Friday 16 February 2007 18:23, Ryan Novosielski wrote:
>  Kern Sibbald wrote:
> > On Wednesday 14 February 2007 15:40, Gavin Conway wrote:
> >> Martin Simmons wrote:
>  Hope this helps someone
> >>>
> >>> That file is generated by configure.  Does rerunning configure
> >>> break it again? What is on the broken line?
> >>>
> >>> __Martin
> >>
> >> Running configure does break it yes. The line looks like this;
> >>
> >> from ./src/host.h
> >> #define HOST_OS  "i686-pc-linux-gnu"
> >> #define DISTNAME "debian"
> >> #define DISTVER  "ubuntu 5.10
> >> testing/unstable"
> >>
> >> Updated to look like;
> >>
> >> from ./src/host.h
> >> #define HOST_OS  "i686-pc-linux-gnu"
> >> #define DISTNAME "debian"
> >> #define DISTVER  ""
> >
> > It looks like Ubuntu has broken the /etc/debian_version file or
> > someone (you) edited it and added an inappropriate cr or lf. Could
> > you send me a copy of that file as an attachment?
> 
>  My debian_version file from 6.10 just says "testing/unstable" with no
>  new line.
> >>>
> >>> Great, but you did not respond in the way I requested.
> >>
> >> I'm also not the same guy, but if you'd like me to do that, sure, why
> >> not? ;)
> >
> > Oh, sorry.  The fact that you were not the reporter probably also
> > explains why your debian_version file looks perfectly normal.  Strange
> > there is no version number, but that shouldn't hurt anything.
>
> I'll boot from the LiveCD's at some point when I get a chance and see if
> there's anything strange about the debian_release files on those, if
> there's even one on there. I have 6.06 and 6.10 laying around. It'd be
> interesting to know if there's something here someone should mention to
> Ubuntu.
>
> =R

-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
___
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users


Re: [Bacula-users] Cannot compile on Ubuntu

2007-02-16 Thread Ryan Novosielski
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Kern Sibbald wrote:
> On Friday 16 February 2007 20:58, Ryan Novosielski wrote:
>> Kern Sibbald wrote:
>>> On Friday 16 February 2007 18:23, Ryan Novosielski wrote:
 Kern Sibbald wrote:
> On Wednesday 14 February 2007 15:40, Gavin Conway wrote:
>> Martin Simmons wrote:
 Hope this helps someone
>>> That file is generated by configure.  Does rerunning configure break
>>> it again? What is on the broken line?
>>>
>>> __Martin
>> Running configure does break it yes. The line looks like this;
>>
>> from ./src/host.h
>> #define HOST_OS  "i686-pc-linux-gnu"
>> #define DISTNAME "debian"
>> #define DISTVER  "ubuntu 5.10
>> testing/unstable"
>>
>> Updated to look like;
>>
>> from ./src/host.h
>> #define HOST_OS  "i686-pc-linux-gnu"
>> #define DISTNAME "debian"
>> #define DISTVER  ""
> It looks like Ubuntu has broken the /etc/debian_version file or someone
> (you) edited it and added an inappropriate cr or lf. Could you send me
> a copy of that file as an attachment?
 My debian_version file from 6.10 just says "testing/unstable" with no
 new line.
>>> Great, but you did not respond in the way I requested.
>> I'm also not the same guy, but if you'd like me to do that, sure, why
>> not? ;)
> 
> Oh, sorry.  The fact that you were not the reporter probably also explains 
> why 
> your debian_version file looks perfectly normal.  Strange there is no version 
> number, but that shouldn't hurt anything.

I'll boot from the LiveCD's at some point when I get a chance and see if
there's anything strange about the debian_release files on those, if
there's even one on there. I have 6.06 and 6.10 laying around. It'd be
interesting to know if there's something here someone should mention to
Ubuntu.

=R

- --
  _  _ _  _ ___  _  _  _
 |Y#| |  | |\/| |  \ |\ |  | |Ryan Novosielski - Systems Programmer III
 |$&| |__| |  | |__/ | \| _| |[EMAIL PROTECTED] - 973/972.0922 (2-0922)
 \__/ Univ. of Med. and Dent.|IST/AST - NJMS Medical Science Bldg - C630
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFF1h0Zmb+gadEcsb4RAjvnAJ98O6HqAP1D92Z7t5hbaklz0Qu4xgCbBNzL
5C6PXO1kjZwYpyGEVHh5mhY=
=RC6v
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
___
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users


Re: [Bacula-users] Cannot compile on Ubuntu

2007-02-16 Thread Kern Sibbald
On Friday 16 February 2007 20:58, Ryan Novosielski wrote:
> Kern Sibbald wrote:
> > On Friday 16 February 2007 18:23, Ryan Novosielski wrote:
> >> Kern Sibbald wrote:
> >>> On Wednesday 14 February 2007 15:40, Gavin Conway wrote:
>  Martin Simmons wrote:
> >> Hope this helps someone
> >
> > That file is generated by configure.  Does rerunning configure break
> > it again? What is on the broken line?
> >
> > __Martin
> 
>  Running configure does break it yes. The line looks like this;
> 
>  from ./src/host.h
>  #define HOST_OS  "i686-pc-linux-gnu"
>  #define DISTNAME "debian"
>  #define DISTVER  "ubuntu 5.10
>  testing/unstable"
> 
>  Updated to look like;
> 
>  from ./src/host.h
>  #define HOST_OS  "i686-pc-linux-gnu"
>  #define DISTNAME "debian"
>  #define DISTVER  ""
> >>>
> >>> It looks like Ubuntu has broken the /etc/debian_version file or someone
> >>> (you) edited it and added an inappropriate cr or lf. Could you send me
> >>> a copy of that file as an attachment?
> >>
> >> My debian_version file from 6.10 just says "testing/unstable" with no
> >> new line.
> >
> > Great, but you did not respond in the way I requested.
>
> I'm also not the same guy, but if you'd like me to do that, sure, why
> not? ;)

Oh, sorry.  The fact that you were not the reporter probably also explains why 
your debian_version file looks perfectly normal.  Strange there is no version 
number, but that shouldn't hurt anything.

-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
___
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users


Re: [Bacula-users] Cannot compile on Ubuntu

2007-02-16 Thread Ryan Novosielski
Kern Sibbald wrote:
> On Friday 16 February 2007 18:23, Ryan Novosielski wrote:
>> Kern Sibbald wrote:
>>> On Wednesday 14 February 2007 15:40, Gavin Conway wrote:
 Martin Simmons wrote:
>> Hope this helps someone
> That file is generated by configure.  Does rerunning configure break it
> again? What is on the broken line?
>
> __Martin
 Running configure does break it yes. The line looks like this;

 from ./src/host.h
 #define HOST_OS  "i686-pc-linux-gnu"
 #define DISTNAME "debian"
 #define DISTVER  "ubuntu 5.10
 testing/unstable"

 Updated to look like;

 from ./src/host.h
 #define HOST_OS  "i686-pc-linux-gnu"
 #define DISTNAME "debian"
 #define DISTVER  ""
>>> It looks like Ubuntu has broken the /etc/debian_version file or someone
>>> (you) edited it and added an inappropriate cr or lf. Could you send me a
>>> copy of that file as an attachment?
>> My debian_version file from 6.10 just says "testing/unstable" with no
>> new line.
> 
> Great, but you did not respond in the way I requested.

I'm also not the same guy, but if you'd like me to do that, sure, why
not? ;)
testing/unstable
-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV___
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users


Re: [Bacula-users] Cannot compile on Ubuntu

2007-02-16 Thread Kern Sibbald
On Friday 16 February 2007 18:23, Ryan Novosielski wrote:
> Kern Sibbald wrote:
> > On Wednesday 14 February 2007 15:40, Gavin Conway wrote:
> >> Martin Simmons wrote:
>  Hope this helps someone
> >>>
> >>> That file is generated by configure.  Does rerunning configure break it
> >>> again? What is on the broken line?
> >>>
> >>> __Martin
> >>
> >> Running configure does break it yes. The line looks like this;
> >>
> >> from ./src/host.h
> >> #define HOST_OS  "i686-pc-linux-gnu"
> >> #define DISTNAME "debian"
> >> #define DISTVER  "ubuntu 5.10
> >> testing/unstable"
> >>
> >> Updated to look like;
> >>
> >> from ./src/host.h
> >> #define HOST_OS  "i686-pc-linux-gnu"
> >> #define DISTNAME "debian"
> >> #define DISTVER  ""
> >
> > It looks like Ubuntu has broken the /etc/debian_version file or someone
> > (you) edited it and added an inappropriate cr or lf. Could you send me a
> > copy of that file as an attachment?
>
> My debian_version file from 6.10 just says "testing/unstable" with no
> new line.

Great, but you did not respond in the way I requested.

>
> =R
>
>
> -
> Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
> Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share
> your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash
> http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
> ___
> Bacula-users mailing list
> Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users

-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
___
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users


Re: [Bacula-users] Cannot compile on Ubuntu

2007-02-16 Thread Ryan Novosielski
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Kern Sibbald wrote:
> On Wednesday 14 February 2007 15:40, Gavin Conway wrote:
>> Martin Simmons wrote:
 Hope this helps someone
>>> That file is generated by configure.  Does rerunning configure break it
>>> again? What is on the broken line?
>>>
>>> __Martin
>> Running configure does break it yes. The line looks like this;
>>
>> from ./src/host.h
>> #define HOST_OS  "i686-pc-linux-gnu"
>> #define DISTNAME "debian"
>> #define DISTVER  "ubuntu 5.10
>> testing/unstable"
>>
>> Updated to look like;
>>
>> from ./src/host.h
>> #define HOST_OS  "i686-pc-linux-gnu"
>> #define DISTNAME "debian"
>> #define DISTVER  ""
> 
> It looks like Ubuntu has broken the /etc/debian_version file or someone (you) 
> edited it and added an inappropriate cr or lf. Could you send me a copy of 
> that file as an attachment?

My debian_version file from 6.10 just says "testing/unstable" with no
new line.

=R
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFF1eiDmb+gadEcsb4RAhniAKCRAT08ozOP7d+bzcs31cXGQnFdpACfUitZ
t9Ya1M01VdA6BlvKLXchXR0=
=A5VA
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
___
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users


Re: [Bacula-users] Cannot compile on Ubuntu

2007-02-14 Thread Martin Simmons
> On Wed, 14 Feb 2007 18:44:44 +0100, Kern Sibbald said:
> 
> On Wednesday 14 February 2007 15:40, Gavin Conway wrote:
> > Martin Simmons wrote:
> > >> Hope this helps someone
> > >
> > > That file is generated by configure.  Does rerunning configure break it
> > > again? What is on the broken line?
> > >
> > > __Martin
> >
> > Running configure does break it yes. The line looks like this;
> >
> > from ./src/host.h
> > #define HOST_OS  "i686-pc-linux-gnu"
> > #define DISTNAME "debian"
> > #define DISTVER  "ubuntu 5.10
> > testing/unstable"
> >
> > Updated to look like;
> >
> > from ./src/host.h
> > #define HOST_OS  "i686-pc-linux-gnu"
> > #define DISTNAME "debian"
> > #define DISTVER  ""
> 
> It looks like Ubuntu has broken the /etc/debian_version file or someone (you) 
> edited it and added an inappropriate cr or lf. Could you send me a copy of 
> that file as an attachment?

>From my tests that shouldn't matter though, because the backquote syntax
replaces newlines by spaces.

__Martin

-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
___
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users


Re: [Bacula-users] Cannot compile on Ubuntu

2007-02-14 Thread Kern Sibbald
On Wednesday 14 February 2007 15:40, Gavin Conway wrote:
> Martin Simmons wrote:
> >> Hope this helps someone
> >
> > That file is generated by configure.  Does rerunning configure break it
> > again? What is on the broken line?
> >
> > __Martin
>
> Running configure does break it yes. The line looks like this;
>
> from ./src/host.h
> #define HOST_OS  "i686-pc-linux-gnu"
> #define DISTNAME "debian"
> #define DISTVER  "ubuntu 5.10
> testing/unstable"
>
> Updated to look like;
>
> from ./src/host.h
> #define HOST_OS  "i686-pc-linux-gnu"
> #define DISTNAME "debian"
> #define DISTVER  ""

It looks like Ubuntu has broken the /etc/debian_version file or someone (you) 
edited it and added an inappropriate cr or lf. Could you send me a copy of 
that file as an attachment?

>
> Cheers,
> Gavin

-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
___
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users


Re: [Bacula-users] Cannot compile on Ubuntu

2007-02-14 Thread Martin Simmons
> On Wed, 14 Feb 2007 14:40:10 +, Gavin Conway said:
> 
> Martin Simmons wrote:
> >>
> >> Hope this helps someone
> > 
> > That file is generated by configure.  Does rerunning configure break it 
> > again?
> > What is on the broken line?
> > 
> > __Martin
> > 
> 
> Running configure does break it yes. The line looks like this;
> 
> from ./src/host.h
> #define HOST_OS  "i686-pc-linux-gnu"
> #define DISTNAME "debian"
> #define DISTVER  "ubuntu 5.10
> testing/unstable"

Hmm, that's strange.  What is the output from

od -c /etc/debian_version
DISTVER=`cat /etc/debian_version`
echo -n $DISTVER | od -c
/bin/sh --version

__Martin

-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
___
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users


Re: [Bacula-users] Cannot compile on Ubuntu

2007-02-14 Thread Gavin Conway
Martin Simmons wrote:
>>
>> Hope this helps someone
> 
> That file is generated by configure.  Does rerunning configure break it again?
> What is on the broken line?
> 
> __Martin
> 

Running configure does break it yes. The line looks like this;

from ./src/host.h
#define HOST_OS  "i686-pc-linux-gnu"
#define DISTNAME "debian"
#define DISTVER  "ubuntu 5.10
testing/unstable"

Updated to look like;

from ./src/host.h
#define HOST_OS  "i686-pc-linux-gnu"
#define DISTNAME "debian"
#define DISTVER  ""

Cheers,
Gavin
-- 

UKS Ltd, Birmingham Road, Studley, Warwickshire, B80 7BG
Tel: 08700 681 333  -  Fax: 01527 851 301  -  AS: 20547
[EMAIL PROTECTED]  -  www.uksolutions.co.uk
- Please, consider the environment before printing this email -

-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
___
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users


Re: [Bacula-users] Cannot compile on Ubuntu

2007-02-14 Thread Martin Simmons
> On Wed, 14 Feb 2007 13:22:16 +, Gavin Conway said:
> 
> Gavin Conway wrote:
> > Apologies for the long email but I'm at my wits end on this one. I'm 
> > using Ubuntu and have just removed Bacula using aptitude so that I can 
> > install the updated version from source.
> > 
> > Here's my compile time options;
> > 
> > ./configure --prefix=/opt/bacula/ --enable-smartalloc --with-mysql 
> > --with-pid-dir=/var/run --with-subsys-dir=/var/lock/subsys 
> > --enable-conio --with-openssl --with-dir-user=bacula 
> > --with-dir-group=bacula --with-sd-user=bacula --with-sd-group=bacula 
> > --with-fd-user=root --with-fd-group=root --with-python --with-readline
> 
> Found the problem with this. For some reason the host.h file had a 
> variable declared without the terminating \" value. I put this in and it 
> has apparently compiled fine.
> 
> Hope this helps someone

That file is generated by configure.  Does rerunning configure break it again?
What is on the broken line?

__Martin

-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
___
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users


Re: [Bacula-users] Cannot compile on Ubuntu

2007-02-14 Thread Gavin Conway
Gavin Conway wrote:
> Apologies for the long email but I'm at my wits end on this one. I'm 
> using Ubuntu and have just removed Bacula using aptitude so that I can 
> install the updated version from source.
> 
> Here's my compile time options;
> 
> ./configure --prefix=/opt/bacula/ --enable-smartalloc --with-mysql 
> --with-pid-dir=/var/run --with-subsys-dir=/var/lock/subsys 
> --enable-conio --with-openssl --with-dir-user=bacula 
> --with-dir-group=bacula --with-sd-user=bacula --with-sd-group=bacula 
> --with-fd-user=root --with-fd-group=root --with-python --with-readline

Found the problem with this. For some reason the host.h file had a 
variable declared without the terminating \" value. I put this in and it 
has apparently compiled fine.

Hope this helps someone

Thanks,
Gavin

-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
___
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users