Re: [Bacula-users] autochanger question

2005-12-19 Thread Kern Sibbald
On Monday 19 December 2005 23:21, Ben McClelland wrote:
> If I have an autochanger with 4 separate drives and 4 jobs (one for
> each of the drives) listed, do I have to have 4 separate pools for
> the media so the drive have their own pool?

You can do that, but if you are using the very latest code, it is not 
necessary.  Bacula now knows how to spread jobs to separate drives.

However, if you want all jobs of name X to go to a particular Volume, and jobs 
of name Y to go to a different Volume (and always the same one until it is 
full) then having separate pools will permit you to do that.

-- 
Best regards,

Kern

  (">
  /\
  V_V


---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files
for problems?  Stop!  Download the new AJAX search engine that makes
searching your log files as easy as surfing the  web.  DOWNLOAD SPLUNK!
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7637&alloc_id=16865&op=click
___
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users


Re: [Bacula-users] autochanger question

2005-12-19 Thread Ben McClelland

my version:

Version: 1.38.0 (28 October 2005)

Can you show a sample configuration setup of how I would spread jobs  
over different drives (if it's possible in the version I'm using)?


thanks,
-Ben

On Dec 19, 2005, at 3:33 PM, Kern Sibbald wrote:


On Monday 19 December 2005 23:21, Ben McClelland wrote:

If I have an autochanger with 4 separate drives and 4 jobs (one for
each of the drives) listed, do I have to have 4 separate pools for
the media so the drive have their own pool?


You can do that, but if you are using the very latest code, it is not
necessary.  Bacula now knows how to spread jobs to separate drives.

However, if you want all jobs of name X to go to a particular  
Volume, and jobs
of name Y to go to a different Volume (and always the same one  
until it is

full) then having separate pools will permit you to do that.

--
Best regards,

Kern

  (">
  /\
  V_V




---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files
for problems?  Stop!  Download the new AJAX search engine that makes
searching your log files as easy as surfing the  web.  DOWNLOAD SPLUNK!
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7637&alloc_id=16865&op=click
___
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users


Re: [Bacula-users] autochanger question

2005-12-19 Thread Kern Sibbald
On Monday 19 December 2005 23:39, Ben McClelland wrote:
> my version:
>
> Version: 1.38.0 (28 October 2005)
>
> Can you show a sample configuration setup of how I would spread jobs
> over different drives (if it's possible in the version I'm using)?

Yes, it is easy.  However, 1.38.0 won't work.  You will need the beta version 
1.38.3, and preferably the one that I will release tomorrow morning -- 1.38.3 
(19 December 2005).  It also has load balancing -- thanks to David Boyes, who 
made me think about it a bit :-)

Since it is late and my cats are demanding their midnight milk, I'll answer 
your question tomorrow when I update the manual on precisely this subject ...

>
> thanks,
> -Ben
>
> On Dec 19, 2005, at 3:33 PM, Kern Sibbald wrote:
> > On Monday 19 December 2005 23:21, Ben McClelland wrote:
> >> If I have an autochanger with 4 separate drives and 4 jobs (one for
> >> each of the drives) listed, do I have to have 4 separate pools for
> >> the media so the drive have their own pool?
> >
> > You can do that, but if you are using the very latest code, it is not
> > necessary.  Bacula now knows how to spread jobs to separate drives.
> >
> > However, if you want all jobs of name X to go to a particular
> > Volume, and jobs
> > of name Y to go to a different Volume (and always the same one
> > until it is
> > full) then having separate pools will permit you to do that.
> >
> > --
> > Best regards,
> >
> > Kern
> >
> >   (">
> >   /\
> >   V_V

-- 
Best regards,

Kern

  (">
  /\
  V_V


---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files
for problems?  Stop!  Download the new AJAX search engine that makes
searching your log files as easy as surfing the  web.  DOWNLOAD SPLUNK!
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7637&alloc_id=16865&op=click
___
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users


Re: [Bacula-users] autochanger question

2005-12-20 Thread Kern Sibbald
On Monday 19 December 2005 23:39, Ben McClelland wrote:
> my version:
>
> Version: 1.38.0 (28 October 2005)
>
> Can you show a sample configuration setup of how I would spread jobs
> over different drives (if it's possible in the version I'm using)?

First, you need to download Bacula 1.38.3 (19 December 2005), then simply add 

  Prefer Mounted Volumes = no

to your Job resources in the Director, and run four or five jobs, and assuming 
you have an Autochanger definition in your Storage daemon with four drives 
configured, you should see your jobs select the four drives.

Here is what I have added to the manual.  If this explanation is not 
sufficient, please let me know:

   If the Prefer Mounted Volumes directive is set to yes (default
   yes), the Storage daemon is requested to select either an Autochanger or
   a drive with a valid Volume already mounted in preference to a drive
   that is not ready.  If no drive with a suitable Volume is available, it
   will select the first available drive.

   If the directive is set to no, the Storage daemon will prefer
   finding an unused drive, otherwise, each job started will append to the
   same Volume (assuming the Pool is the same for all jobs).  Setting
   Prefer Mounted Volumes to no can be useful for those sites particularly
   with multiple drive autochangers that prefer to maximumize backup
   throughput at the expense of using additional drives and Volumes.  As an
   optimization, when using multiple drives, you will probably want to
   start each of your jobs one after another with approximately 5 second
   intervals.  This will help ensure that each night, the same drive
   (Volume) is selected for the same job, otherwise, when you do a restore,
   you may find the files spread over many more Volumes than necessary.



>
> thanks,
> -Ben
>
> On Dec 19, 2005, at 3:33 PM, Kern Sibbald wrote:
> > On Monday 19 December 2005 23:21, Ben McClelland wrote:
> >> If I have an autochanger with 4 separate drives and 4 jobs (one for
> >> each of the drives) listed, do I have to have 4 separate pools for
> >> the media so the drive have their own pool?
> >
> > You can do that, but if you are using the very latest code, it is not
> > necessary.  Bacula now knows how to spread jobs to separate drives.
> >
> > However, if you want all jobs of name X to go to a particular
> > Volume, and jobs
> > of name Y to go to a different Volume (and always the same one
> > until it is
> > full) then having separate pools will permit you to do that.
> >
> > --
> > Best regards,
> >
> > Kern
> >
> >   (">
> >   /\
> >   V_V

-- 
Best regards,

Kern

  (">
  /\
  V_V


---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files
for problems?  Stop!  Download the new AJAX search engine that makes
searching your log files as easy as surfing the  web.  DOWNLOAD SPLUNK!
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7637&alloc_id=16865&op=click
___
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users


Re: [Bacula-users] autochanger question

2005-12-20 Thread Frank Sweetser
On Tue, Dec 20, 2005 at 12:54:04PM +0100, Kern Sibbald wrote:
>If the directive is set to no, the Storage daemon will prefer
>finding an unused drive, otherwise, each job started will append to the
>same Volume (assuming the Pool is the same for all jobs).  Setting

Excellent!  This is exactly the scenario I'm in - an autochanger with two
drives, only one of which is currently in use.  Two questions about this
feature, though:

1) I'm assuming that once a given volume is picked for a job, all data from
that job will go to that volume (assuming the volume doesn't fill up, of
course).  Ie, if the job is large enough that it has to be despooled in several
passes, will bacula ensure that it doesn't get split up unecessarily?

2) I'd like to start setting up different pools and policies for full vs
incremental/differentials, so that older full backups can easily be transfered
to offsite storage.  To facilitate this, I'd like to be able to have all of
a given run of full backups end up on a single tape set.  Will using both
drives like this interfere with doing so?

-- 
Frank Sweetser fs at wpi.edu  |  For every problem, there is a solution that
WPI Network Engineer  |  is simple, elegant, and wrong. - HL Mencken
GPG fingerprint = 6174 1257 129E 0D21 D8D4  E8A3 8E39 29E3 E2E8 8CEC


---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files
for problems?  Stop!  Download the new AJAX search engine that makes
searching your log files as easy as surfing the  web.  DOWNLOAD SPLUNK!
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7637&alloc_id=16865&op=click
___
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users


Re: [Bacula-users] autochanger question

2005-12-20 Thread Kern Sibbald
On Tuesday 20 December 2005 15:16, Frank Sweetser wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 20, 2005 at 12:54:04PM +0100, Kern Sibbald wrote:
> >If the directive is set to no, the Storage daemon will prefer
> >finding an unused drive, otherwise, each job started will append to
> > the same Volume (assuming the Pool is the same for all jobs).  Setting
>
> Excellent!  This is exactly the scenario I'm in - an autochanger with two
> drives, only one of which is currently in use.  Two questions about this
> feature, though:
>
> 1) I'm assuming that once a given volume is picked for a job, all data from
> that job will go to that volume (assuming the volume doesn't fill up, of
> course).  Ie, if the job is large enough that it has to be despooled in
> several passes, will bacula ensure that it doesn't get split up
> unecessarily?

Yes.

>
> 2) I'd like to start setting up different pools and policies for full vs
> incremental/differentials, so that older full backups can easily be
> transfered to offsite storage.  To facilitate this, I'd like to be able to
> have all of a given run of full backups end up on a single tape set.  Will
> using both drives like this interfere with doing so?

I don't think so, but your question is not very clear, so I'm not sure. The 
only reservation I have is what is mentioned at the end of my text about jobs 
run on different days.

-- 
Best regards,

Kern

  (">
  /\
  V_V


---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files
for problems?  Stop!  Download the new AJAX search engine that makes
searching your log files as easy as surfing the  web.  DOWNLOAD SPLUNK!
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7637&alloc_id=16865&op=click
___
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users


Re: [Bacula-users] Autochanger question

2005-07-20 Thread Arno Lehmann

Hello,

Beren Gamble wrote:


How do I make bacula place the next tape in the drive once it has filled
up the first tape? Can this be done automatically?


This is done automatically if you set up your SD and your DIR to use an 
autochanger.


This is documented in the manual.

If, after fllowing the manual instructions and doing the suggested tests 
you still have difficulties you should post your configuration and 
relevant configuration and command output quotes, than we can probably help.


Arno



Cheers,

Beren


**
The views expressed within this e-mail are those of the individual and not 
necessarily those of the Council. The information in this internet e-mail is 
confidential and may contain legally privileged information. If you are not the 
intended above named addressee it may be unlawful for you to read, copy, 
distribute or otherwise use the information in this internet e-mail. If you are 
not the intended recipient of this internet e-mail please telephone the sender 
on +44(0)20 8863 5611.
LONDON BOROUGH OF HARROW...
**



---
SF.Net email is sponsored by: Discover Easy Linux Migration Strategies
from IBM. Find simple to follow Roadmaps, straightforward articles,
informative Webcasts and more! Get everything you need to get up to
speed, fast. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7477&alloc_id=16492&op=click
___
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users



--
IT-Service Lehmann[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Arno Lehmann  http://www.its-lehmann.de


---
SF.Net email is sponsored by: Discover Easy Linux Migration Strategies
from IBM. Find simple to follow Roadmaps, straightforward articles,
informative Webcasts and more! Get everything you need to get up to
speed, fast. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7477&alloc_id=16492&op=click
___
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users


Re: [Bacula-users] Autochanger question for configuration with multiple devices

2010-08-02 Thread John Drescher
> i am fresh on the list and maybe there is an archive entry for my question
> or somebody has a link to an how tobut in the internet i found nothing
> what helps me
>
>
> my config is:
>
> i have bacula 5.0.1 on ubuntu an a Tandberg Storage T24 with two devies. i
> get to manage that bacula is using an device for backup, but the second
> which is also configured in the autochanger section isn't used for now. I
> configured one tape set und 4 Jobs which should write on the same tape set.
>
> How can i seduce bacula to use two devices in on autochanger at the same
> time?
>
Use different pools. Or

PreferMountedVolumes=no

google for that. The manual is down right now.

> For the overview and some information i use BAT but not one nor two devices
> will be shown in the storage viewthe device list is empty!?
>
> I used the configuration for bacula which comes with the standard set, i
> actived the autochanger section with two devices.
>
> How do i have to configure bacula to use two devices?
>
> it would be awesome if you can help me out with that
>
> thanks
>
> carlo
> --
> The Palm PDK Hot Apps Program offers developers who use the
> Plug-In Development Kit to bring their C/C++ apps to Palm for a share
> of $1 Million in cash or HP Products. Visit us here for more details:
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/dev2dev-palm
> ___
> Bacula-users mailing list
> Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
>
>



-- 
John M. Drescher

--
The Palm PDK Hot Apps Program offers developers who use the
Plug-In Development Kit to bring their C/C++ apps to Palm for a share
of $1 Million in cash or HP Products. Visit us here for more details:
http://p.sf.net/sfu/dev2dev-palm
___
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users