RE: Baha'i Liberation "Theology"
there has not been a reply to this message of mine, and I am afraid that it may be that my post created the wrong impression. I have this habit of trying to keep an open mind and so I inquire. I do not see how a liberation theology could come about, other than in an organic way, but that does not mean for me that there is no other way. Only that I do not see it. And I would like to see it. That is why I asked my questions, basically to anybody, but specifically to Mark, since he started the topic. My motivation is always one of expanding my understanding, vision and mind. I am quite a direct person and English is not my first language, so that combination may make me sometimes come across in internet discussions as aggressive, but that is not my intention. I just have an enquiring mind. Janine The information contained in this e-mail and any attachments thereto ("e-mail") is sent by the Johnson County Community College ("JCCC") and is intended to be confidential and for the use of only the individual or entity named above. The information may be protected by federal and state privacy and disclosures acts or other legal rules. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are notified that retention, dissemination, distribution or copying of this e-mail is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error please immediately notify JCCC by email reply and immediately and permanently delete this e-mail message and any attachments thereto. Thank you. __ You are subscribed to Baha'i Studies as: mailto:archive@mail-archive.com Unsubscribe: send a blank email to mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Subscribe: send subscribe bahai-st in the message body to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subscribe: http://list.jccc.edu:8080/read/all_forums/subscribe?name=bahai-st Baha'i Studies is available through the following: Mail - mailto:bahai-st@list.jccc.edu Web - http://list.jccc.edu:8080/read/?forum=bahai-st News - news://list.jccc.edu/bahai-st Public - http://www.escribe.com/religion/bahaist Old Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.net New Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.edu
RE: Baha'i Liberation "Theology"
I read most of the posts in this thread, an interesting subject. I would love to hear your ideas Mark about Bahai Liberation theology. I would also love to hear how you see individual Bahais, right now, at this point in time, who live in the western countries which are rich, put into practice a Bahai Liberation theology. You see, I have no clue. I am a practically inclined person who would love to see the suffering of people end now more likely than tomorrow, but I feel quite frustrated because there seems to be so little I can do in a practical way, except telling people about the Bahai teachings and trying to get them to study the Bahai writings for themselves. When I was in my 20s i heard slowly over about 10 years, how western multinationals behave, how for every dollar we give in aid to poor countries we get one dollar and 25 cents back. I tried to stop contributing to this kind of thing and I found it was almost impossible to do, unless I went to live in the desert on almost nothing somewhere, and even then It looked so big, that I gave up fighting for a bit, though I was always careful not to buy things I do not really need. Even the demand for cheap goods is something that is two sided. I live now in Ireland. I grew up in Holland. In Holland, for more than 35 years the governmental system and public opinion ensured that even people who were living on social benefit, had a reasonable life. Good housing was provided, they could keep themselves warm and get good health care. The children were educated for free in quite good schools and after that, getting a bit into debt but not that much, could get themselves a college education and/or a degree, up until they were 27, starting your studies after 27 meant you had to pay the costs of it totally by yourselves. Here in Ireland that was never the case. Council estates usally are appalling, most council houses do not have central heating (unlike in Holland), medical health care, well, the minimum and long waiting lists and only when you are the poorest, if you are in the middle there is no net for you, so you can end up being even poorer than someone on social benefit, unless you live in a council house of course. I believe college fees are free or were free (am not so sure now) but the schools are not the best, private schools are far better than state schools, unlike in Holland and if you are from a council estate (which immediately pinpoints you in a particular economic class) and have gone to a state school chances are very small that you get sufficient support to think about getting a degree, let alone finish one. The good thing is that to get a good job more and more a degree or at least a diploma is required, so from that point of view more and more young people will be stimulated to go to college. I never earned much money, not even when I was living in Holland. I could get by but that usually also had to do with the choices I made: not going on holiday as much as other people of my age did, not driving a car and often living in the cheapest rented houses. For quite a long time I lived in a studio, with the bare necessities. When I came to Ireland, I had no money to buy a house and rents were and still are, very high. I shared for a long time with other people, lived in damp and expensive places, until the rents dropped a little and I live now in a two bedroomed but very luxurious house, ending up paying half of my salary in rent, which means i cannot save money. I can of course share again, but after so long of sharing and living in cramped places (most of my life) I love to have a bit of privacy in my middle years. That is the choice I make. Food, clothing etc. are far more expensive here in Ireland than they are in Holland, let alone the USA. Electronic goods and services ditto. Under these circumstances buying the cheapest available goods becomes a necessity, is not a matter of choice anymore. Should prices go up more, I would have to let go of even the very small luxuries I have, not be able to buy books but maybe one or two a year and would certainly have to give up broadband. Compared to many people in poorer countries I am rich beyond means. That is the irony of it, because to be able to have a reasonable life in a rich country, you need certain things you would not need so much in a poor country as one of the richer poor people. Of course whne you are the poorest of the poor in a rich country, you are constantly on starvation point and most probably do not have a home to go to. The current system is wrong, as it is driven by greed solely and it needs to be balanced. I would love to see it change. The only way I think it can change is when enough people accept the teachings of the Bahai faith and are willing to be obedient to the guidance as given to the world through the administrative order. Not because I think that when enough people are doing both, we all of
RE: Baha'i Liberation "Theology" ((long quote))
Dear Mark, You write: At 12:41 PM 10/13/2005, you wrote: >>Whether or not there is in your opinion such a 'thing' as a communist state is not the point. The point is that both Yugoslavs did in fact live in a communist state - as do North Koreans. Both suffer(ed) oppression based on and justified by the Marxist and Leninist (and in Korea's case Stalinist)<< "Our perspectives are so far apart on this subject that I doubt we will ever agree." Agreed. You write: "Only the Soviet Union, at the time of Lenin, lived in Leninist system. The Koreans live under Kim Il Sung's system; and the Yugoslavs lived under Marshall Tito's system. You can't take an idea out of its original historical context, recontextualize it, and expect it to look the same. I am surprised that you would even suggest it." They were all singing from the same page albeit in different voices and with a few occasional variations thrown in. But in each case it was the same song: command economy, class struggle, dialectical and historical materialism, revolutionary vanguard etc. You write: "If these systems have borrowed, to varying degrees, from Lenin's (or Marx's) ideas, that can be argued and defended. However, isomorphism cannot, at least not without committing several logical fallacies, be assumed a priori based simply on shared vocabulary, on limited observed resemblances, or on the fact that certain people have elected to place them into the same category." Who's doing that? You write: "And how does that make North Korea either a socialist or a communist society? If anything, you have just defeated your own argument. Karl Marx never advocated oppressing the Lumpenproletariat in the name of protecting them from "would-be class enemies." So, you are arguing that NK is not a Communist state? Despite its open adherence to Marx, Lenin, Stalin etc. . . I never said the Lumpproletariat were the class enemies against which the NK regime was oppressing its own people. The class enemies are (a) the internal agents of the external capitalists - read U.S. and (b) the capitalist world itself but chiefly the U.S. You write: "Precision is important." I'm surprised to see you making such a claim since according to you a word can mean anything we, I or you or anyone else want it to mean. So it boils down to the question of 'precision - according to whom?' You write: >>Totalitarian 1 (Wikipedia): "A totalitarian régime or state attempts to *control nearly every aspect* of personal, economic, and political life",<< "That is standard usage - and China is allowing free markets which would differ with the definition you provided. The rest of your definitions are comparable to the above." My original definition of totalitarianism already included the Wikipedia definition: I said that totalitarianism does not recognise the distinction between public and private spheres and therefore interferes in both. As I also pointed out, Russia is no longer Communist at all although it is somewhat authoritarian, and China is in an intermediate stage, divesting itself of Communism but still retaining important features of Communist totalitarianism. You write: "The revolutionary (proletarian) vanguard are not, using Marx's definitions, "dictators" until they have seized the apparatus of the state. At that point, they, minus any members of the bourgeoisie and intelligentsia who may have assisted them, constitute a dictatorship of the proletariat (socialism)." Through the Communist Party the proletariat have seized the state and are thus ruling themselves. Whether or not the Party can include intelligentsia ("brain workers") is an old question Communists have never decisively resolved amongst themselves. You write: "I disagree - if we are using Marx's definitions. He was very precise." Back to definitions. Marx is not noted for his precision - hence the bitter disputes among early and late communists and even modern communists. You write: >>OK, so let me rephrase that: the vision of a stateless modern industrialized world/society is sweet but naively idealistic especially in light of the actual history of Communism.<< "I don't disagree with that. IMO, most of Marx's vision is eminently impractical and out of date. That is why there are few "pure" Marxists left (early or late Marxists)." It's good to know we can agree on something. You write: I wrote: The similarities, IMO, were either a result of oppression (the iron curtain) or were mostly linguistic (using the same word to describe North Korea and Yugoslavia or Lenin and Stalin). Ian replied: >>The similarities may be linguistic to you, but that doesn't mean the similarities are not real.<< "I did not say that all the similarities were entirely linguistic." But you did say they "were *mostly* linguistic" in the case of NK and Yugoslavia. (See above) IOW, you tried to dismiss the similarities as either chimerical, superficial or unimportant. My point is that th
RE: Baha'i Liberation "Theology" ((long quote)) (ERROR)
Dear Mark, - I hit send instead of save. I'll send the rest when I'm done. Best wishes, Ian Kluge The information contained in this e-mail and any attachments thereto ("e-mail") is sent by the Johnson County Community College ("JCCC") and is intended to be confidential and for the use of only the individual or entity named above. The information may be protected by federal and state privacy and disclosures acts or other legal rules. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are notified that retention, dissemination, distribution or copying of this e-mail is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error please immediately notify JCCC by email reply and immediately and permanently delete this e-mail message and any attachments thereto. Thank you. __ You are subscribed to Baha'i Studies as: mailto:archive@mail-archive.com Unsubscribe: send a blank email to mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Subscribe: send subscribe bahai-st in the message body to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subscribe: http://list.jccc.edu:8080/read/all_forums/subscribe?name=bahai-st Baha'i Studies is available through the following: Mail - mailto:bahai-st@list.jccc.edu Web - http://list.jccc.edu:8080/read/?forum=bahai-st News - news://list.jccc.edu/bahai-st Public - http://www.escribe.com/religion/bahaist Old Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.net New Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.edu
RE: Baha'i Liberation "Theology" ((long quote))
Dear Mark, You write: At 12:41 PM 10/13/2005, you wrote: >>Whether or not there is in your opinion such a 'thing' as a communist state is not the point. The point is that both Yugoslavs did in fact live in a communist state - as do North Koreans. Both suffer(ed) oppression based on and justified by the Marxist and Leninist (and in Korea's case Stalinist)<< "Our perspectives are so far apart on this subject that I doubt we will ever agree." Agreed. You write: "Only the Soviet Union, at the time of Lenin, lived in Leninist system. The Koreans live under Kim Il Sung's system; and the Yugoslavs lived under Marshall Tito's system. You can't take an idea out of its original historical context, recontextualize it, and expect it to look the same. I am surprised that you would even suggest it." They were all singing from the same page albeit in different voce's and with a few occasional variations thrown in. But in each case it was the same song: command economy, class struggle, dialectical and historical materialism, etc. You write: "If these systems have borrowed, to varying degrees, from Lenin's (or Marx's) ideas, that can be argued and defended. However, isomorphism cannot, at least not without committing several logical fallacies, be assumed a priori based simply on shared vocabulary, on limited observed resemblances, or on the fact that certain people have elected to place them into the same category." Certainly not. Isomorpthism is based on similarity of structure/organization, process or purpose - or as we say in traditional philosophy, form, content, modus operandi and purpose (final cause). (The more things change the more they stay the same.) When things share significant features of form, and content, modus operandi and final cause, they are isomorphic to that degree. They shared institutional, coercive, normative and mimetic isomorphism. You write: >>Class struggle is obviously present in NK in the form of the tremendous oppression inflicted upon the people/prolateraiat in the name of protecting them from an exploitive would-be class enemies.<< "And how does that make North Korea either a socialist or a communist society? If anything, you have just defeated your own argument. Karl Marx never advocated oppressing the Lumpenproletariat in the name of protecting them from "would-be class enemies." So, you are arguing that NK is not a Communist state? Despite its open adherence to Marx, Lenin, Stalin etc. This has nothing to do with the Lumpenproletariat. >>Here we go again - another battle of definitions!<< Precision is important. >>Totalitarian 1 (Wikipedia): "A totalitarian régime or state attempts to *control nearly every aspect* of personal, economic, and political life",<< That is standard usage - and China is allowing free markets which would differ with the definition you provided. The rest of your definitions are comparable to the above. As I said, China (and Russia) would, today, qualify as authoritarian, not as totalitarian. >>(1) If that's true, matters are even worse - 2 dictatorships instead of one: (a) the dictatorship of the revolutionary vanguard followed by (b) the dictatorship of the proletariat followed by an imaginary withering away of the state. How can anyone take this seriously?<< The revolutionary (proletarian) vanguard are not, using Marx's definitions, "dictators" until they have seized the apparatus of the state. At that point, they, minus any members of the bourgeoisie and intelligentsia who may have assisted them, constitute a dictatorship of the proletariat (socialism). >>(2) It's purely a matter of interpretation whether or not the Communist states reached the dictatorship of the proletariat.<< I disagree - if we are using Marx's definitions. He was very precise. >>OK, so let me rephrase that: the vision of a stateless modern industrialized world/society is sweet but naively idealistic especially in light of the actual history of Communism.<< I don't disagree with that. IMO, most of Marx's vision is eminently impractical and out of date. That is why there are few "pure" Marxists left (early or late Marxists). I wrote: The similarities, IMO, were either a result of oppression (the iron curtain) or were mostly linguistic (using the same word to describe North Korea and Yugoslavia or Lenin and Stalin). You replied: >>The similarities may be linguistic to you, but that doesn't mean the similarities are not real.<< I did not say that all the similarities were entirely linguistic. >>(2) Total oppression is itself one of the similarities that all Communist states share.<< "Total oppression" is just words. Do you mean totalitarianism? How was there "total oppression" in Yugoslavia? How is there total oppression in modern mainland China? >>That's all very fine, but the fact is that Communism is so inept in its analysis of reality and its actions that it could not even last a century either economically or socially.<< Communi
RE: Baha'i Liberation "Theology" ((long quote))
Ian, At 12:41 PM 10/13/2005, you wrote: >>Whether or not there is in your opinion such a 'thing' as a communist state >>is not the point. The point is that both Yugoslavs did in fact live in a >>communist state - as do North Koreans. Both suffer(ed) oppression based on >>and justified by the Marxist and Leninist (and in Korea's case Stalinist)<< Our perspectives are so far apart on this subject that I doubt we will ever agree. Only the Soviet Union, at the time of Lenin, lived in Leninist system. The Koreans live under Kim Il Sung's system; and the Yugoslavs lived under Marshall Tito's system. You can't take an idea out of its original historical context, recontextualize it, and expect it to look the same. I am surprised that you would even suggest it. If these systems have borrowed, to varying degrees, from Lenin's (or Marx's) ideas, that can be argued and defended. However, isomorphism cannot, at least not without committing several logical fallacies, be assumed a priori based simply on shared vocabulary, on limited observed resemblances, or on the fact that certain people have elected to place them into the same category. >>Class struggle is obviously present in NK in the form of the tremendous >>oppression inflicted upon the people/prolateraiat in the name of protecting >>them from an exploitive would-be class enemies.<< And how does that make North Korea either a socialist or a communist society? If anything, you have just defeated your own argument. Karl Marx never advocated oppressing the Lumpenproletariat in the name of protecting them from "would-be class enemies." >>Here we go again - another battle of definitions!<< Precision is important. >>Totalitarian 1 (Wikipedia): "A totalitarian régime or state attempts to >>*control nearly every aspect* of personal, economic, and political life",<< That is standard usage - and China is allowing free markets which would differ with the definition you provided. The rest of your definitions are comparable to the above. As I said, China (and Russia) would, today, qualify as authoritarian, not as totalitarian. >>(1) If that's true, matters are even worse - 2 dictatorships instead of one: >>(a) the dictatorship of the revolutionary vanguard followed by (b) the >>dictatorship of the proletariat followed by an imaginary withering away of >>the state. How can anyone take this seriously?<< The revolutionary (proletarian) vanguard are not, using Marx's definitions, "dictators" until they have seized the apparatus of the state. At that point, they, minus any members of the bourgeoisie and intelligentsia who may have assisted them, constitute a dictatorship of the proletariat (socialism). >>(2) It's purely a matter of interpretation whether or not the Communist >>states reached the dictatorship of the proletariat.<< I disagree - if we are using Marx's definitions. He was very precise. >>OK, so let me rephrase that: the vision of a stateless modern industrialized >>world/society is sweet but naively idealistic especially in light of the >>actual history of Communism.<< I don't disagree with that. IMO, most of Marx's vision is eminently impractical and out of date. That is why there are few "pure" Marxists left (early or late Marxists). I wrote: The similarities, IMO, were either a result of oppression (the iron curtain) or were mostly linguistic (using the same word to describe North Korea and Yugoslavia or Lenin and Stalin). You replied: >>The similarities may be linguistic to you, but that doesn't mean the >>similarities are not real.<< I did not say that all the similarities were entirely linguistic. >>(2) Total oppression is itself one of the similarities that all Communist >>states share.<< "Total oppression" is just words. Do you mean totalitarianism? How was there "total oppression" in Yugoslavia? How is there total oppression in modern mainland China? >>That's all very fine, but the fact is that Communism is so inept in its >>analysis of reality and its actions that it could not even last a century >>either economically or socially.<< Communism is a term for a variety of social constructions. As social constructions, they cannot be "inept." Only people can be inept. >>Corporate capitalism certainly has its problems - extremes of wealth >>andpoverty - but the basic system is viable. Future economics will be some >>form of capitalist economics.<< The Guardian said that there is nothing preventing some form of capitalism. He did not say, as you have, that "[f]uture economics will be some form of capitalist economics." And `Abdu'l-Baha was making suggestions in the context of early 20th-century capitalism, i.e., how to improve it. He also never predicted that capitalism, however constructed, would become the economic system of the future. However, for what it's worth, I have nothing against some small-scale capitalism. My problem is with corporate capitalism, which has
RE: Baha'i Liberation "Theology" ((long quote))
Dear Mark, "I didn't say that they did not live in a communist state. I suggested that there is no such *thing* as a communist state. There are only particular social constructions (nations) which may have certain observable similarities. Tito, through his political genius, allowed Yugoslavia functioned in both the first and second world." Whether or not there is in your opinion such a 'thing' as a communist state is not the point. The point is that both Yugoslavs did in fact live in a communist state - as do North Koreans. Both suffer(ed) oppression based on and justified by the Marxist and Leninist (and in Korea's case Stalinist) ideology. You write: "Where is the class struggle in Kim Il Sung's North Korea? And how did the so-called revolutions and class struggles in certain nations relate to Marx's views? You are, IMO, confusing labels with constructions." Class struggle is obviously present in NK in the form of the tremendous oppression inflicted upon the people/prolateraiat in the name of protecting them from an exploitive would-be class enemies. You write: >>But I did not say all totalitarian states are communist. China is was and to a large extent still totalitarian e.g. does not recognise the difference between public and private spheres of existence - which is why it persecutes people for private opinions. Religious beliefs and keeps close control of the internet.<< "That would, as I think would be defined by most political scientists and political sociologists, qualify it as authoritarian, not totalitarian." Here we go again - another battle of definitions! Totalitarian 1 (Wikipedia): "A totalitarian régime or state attempts to *control nearly every aspect* of personal, economic, and political life", i.e. it does not recognise the difference between public and private aspects of life and exerts control over them. All aspects of life are mobilized in the entire populations. Totalitarian states care about what we think (and feel) *and* want our obedience; authoritarian states don't care what we think as long as we outwardly obey. Totalitarian 2: A Glossary of Political Economy Terms: (Dr. Paul M Johnson) "Domination by a single, like-minded governing elite of all (or virtually all) organized political, economic, social and cultural activities in a country [ i.e domination of public and private] by means of a single-party monopoly of power, police repression not only of all forms of dissent and opposition but also of all forms of independent private organizations as such, rigorous censorship of the mass media, centralized state planning and administration of the economy, and pervasive propaganda to inculcate the principles of the obligatory official ideology. Totalitarian states differ from traditional dictatorships or despotisms primarily with respect to the broader ("total") scope of human behavior [ public and private] that the authorities seek to regulate in detail" http://66.102.7.104/search?q=cache:0g8WXPdmc3sJ:www.auburn.edu/~johnspm/glos s/totalitarianism+totalitarianism&hl=en Totalitarian 3: "a modern autocratic government in which the state involves itself in all facets of society, including the daily life of its citizens [ i.e. controls public and private spheres] . A totalitarian government seeks to control not only all economic and political matters but the attitudes, values, and beliefs of its population, erasing the distinction between state and society." [i.e. controls the private] Columbia Enclyclopedia http://www.bartleby.com/65/to/totalita.html You write re dictatorship of the proletariat: "No. It is a stage they never reached. In order to have a dictatorship of the proletariat (socialism), the working class (not some class of intelligentsia which claims to represent them) needs to be in charge." (1) If that's true, matters are even worse - 2 dictatorships instead of one: (a) the dictatorship of the revolutionary vanguard followed by (b) the dictatorship of the proletariat followed by an imaginary withering away of the state. How can anyone take this seriously? (2) It's purely a matter of interpretation whether or not the Communist states reached the dictatorship of the proletariat. One can just as well argue that the proletariat was in charge insofar as its interests guided the actions of the revolutionary vanguard i.e. the vanguard had no interests of its own but only those of the proletariat. You write: "That is ad hominem, i.e. attacking the messenger. There are a lot of very smart people who advocate various interpretations of Bakunin's and Marx's ideas of communism." OK, so let me rephrase that: the vision of a stateless modern industrialized world/society is sweet but naively idealistic especially in light of the actual history of Communism. You write re NK and Yugoslavia: "The similarities, IMO, were either a result of oppression (the iron curtain) or were mostly linguistic (using the same word to describe North Korea and
RE: Baha'i Liberation "Theology" ((long quote))
Ian, At 10:20 PM 10/12/2005, you wrote: >>In fact, I was not thinking of this passage as you assumed but rather of the >>Guardian's quote which makes it quite clear that natural differences among >>human beings must form a part of any accurate explanation of social and >>economic differences among people. From this it follows that 'corporatocracy' >>alone cannot explain these differences.<< I never said that it could. My point is that most corporate cultures are more about holding onto power and wealth than guaranteeing that people are paid justly for their work. Via moderna, Mark A. Foster . http://markfoster.net ... [a] word is ... a universal. - William of Ockham Structurization Tech: http://tech.structurization.com The information contained in this e-mail and any attachments thereto ("e-mail") is sent by the Johnson County Community College ("JCCC") and is intended to be confidential and for the use of only the individual or entity named above. The information may be protected by federal and state privacy and disclosures acts or other legal rules. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are notified that retention, dissemination, distribution or copying of this e-mail is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error please immediately notify JCCC by email reply and immediately and permanently delete this e-mail message and any attachments thereto. Thank you. __ You are subscribed to Baha'i Studies as: mailto:archive@mail-archive.com Unsubscribe: send a blank email to mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Subscribe: send subscribe bahai-st in the message body to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subscribe: http://list.jccc.edu:8080/read/all_forums/subscribe?name=bahai-st Baha'i Studies is available through the following: Mail - mailto:bahai-st@list.jccc.edu Web - http://list.jccc.edu:8080/read/?forum=bahai-st News - news://list.jccc.edu/bahai-st Public - http://www.escribe.com/religion/bahaist Old Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.net New Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.edu
RE: Baha'i Liberation "Theology" ((long quote))
Dear Mark, You wrote the following in reference to my quote from "Directives from the Guardian", 20: " Where does the Guardian say that? I have never seen any statement which comes even marginally close to what you wrote. I assume, however, that you are thinking of this passage: "...The Master has definitely stated that wages should be unequal, simply because that men are unequal in their ability, and hence should receive wages that would correspond to their varying capacities and resources." -- From a letter written on behalf of Shoghi Effendi to an individual believer, December 26, 1935 (Lights of Guidance, p.550) In fact, I was not thinking of this passage as you assumed but rather of the Guardian's quote which makes it quite clear that natural differences among human beings must form a part of any accurate explanation of social and economic differences among people. From this it follows that 'corporatocracy' alone cannot explain these differences. Best wishes, Ian Kluge Best wishes, Ian Kluge -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mark A. Foster Sent: October 12, 2005 7:43 PM To: Baha'i Studies Subject: RE: Baha'i Liberation "Theology" ((long quote)) Ian, At 09:22 PM 10/12/2005, you wrote: >>Unfortunately you assume incorrectly.<< What did I assume incorrectly? >>The quote ( did not write it) is from Shoghi Effendi, "Directives from the Guardian" 20.<< Yes, but that is the passage I quoted in my last message to you! I did not cite the reference from Paris Talks, since most of the material in that book has not been authenticated. You cite a number of passages which say that wages should be unequal. That is true. However, where did I ever say that the position taken by `Abdu'l-Baha and Shoghi Effendi was something else? As Baha'is, we believe in the elimination of the extremes of poverty and wealth, not in the elimination of all wage and salary differences. Perhaps it might help if you would tell me what you believe to be my position. It does not appear that you understand it. Via moderna, Mark A. Foster . http://markfoster.net ... [a] word is ... a universal. - William of Ockham Structurization Tech: http://tech.structurization.com The information contained in this e-mail and any attachments thereto ("e-mail") is sent by the Johnson County Community College ("JCCC") and is intended to be confidential and for the use of only the individual or entity named above. The information may be protected by federal and state privacy and disclosures acts or other legal rules. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are notified that retention, dissemination, distribution or copying of this e-mail is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error please immediately notify JCCC by email reply and immediately and permanently delete this e-mail message and any attachments thereto. Thank you. __ You are subscribed to Baha'i Studies as: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: send a blank email to mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Subscribe: send subscribe bahai-st in the message body to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subscribe: http://list.jccc.edu:8080/read/all_forums/subscribe?name=bahai-st Baha'i Studies is available through the following: Mail - mailto:bahai-st@list.jccc.edu Web - http://list.jccc.edu:8080/read/?forum=bahai-st News - news://list.jccc.edu/bahai-st Public - http://www.escribe.com/religion/bahaist Old Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.net New Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.edu __ You are subscribed to Baha'i Studies as: mailto:archive@mail-archive.com Unsubscribe: send a blank email to mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Subscribe: send subscribe bahai-st in the message body to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subscribe: http://list.jccc.edu:8080/read/all_forums/subscribe?name=bahai-st Baha'i Studies is available through the following: Mail - mailto:bahai-st@list.jccc.edu Web - http://list.jccc.edu:8080/read/?forum=bahai-st News - news://list.jccc.edu/bahai-st Public - http://www.escribe.com/religion/bahaist Old Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.net New Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.edu
RE: Baha'i Liberation "Theology" ((long quote))
Ian, At 09:22 PM 10/12/2005, you wrote: >>Unfortunately you assume incorrectly.<< What did I assume incorrectly? >>The quote ( did not write it) is from Shoghi Effendi, "Directives from the >>Guardian" 20.<< Yes, but that is the passage I quoted in my last message to you! I did not cite the reference from Paris Talks, since most of the material in that book has not been authenticated. You cite a number of passages which say that wages should be unequal. That is true. However, where did I ever say that the position taken by `Abdu'l-Baha and Shoghi Effendi was something else? As Baha'is, we believe in the elimination of the extremes of poverty and wealth, not in the elimination of all wage and salary differences. Perhaps it might help if you would tell me what you believe to be my position. It does not appear that you understand it. Via moderna, Mark A. Foster . http://markfoster.net ... [a] word is ... a universal. - William of Ockham Structurization Tech: http://tech.structurization.com The information contained in this e-mail and any attachments thereto ("e-mail") is sent by the Johnson County Community College ("JCCC") and is intended to be confidential and for the use of only the individual or entity named above. The information may be protected by federal and state privacy and disclosures acts or other legal rules. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are notified that retention, dissemination, distribution or copying of this e-mail is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error please immediately notify JCCC by email reply and immediately and permanently delete this e-mail message and any attachments thereto. Thank you. __ You are subscribed to Baha'i Studies as: mailto:archive@mail-archive.com Unsubscribe: send a blank email to mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Subscribe: send subscribe bahai-st in the message body to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subscribe: http://list.jccc.edu:8080/read/all_forums/subscribe?name=bahai-st Baha'i Studies is available through the following: Mail - mailto:bahai-st@list.jccc.edu Web - http://list.jccc.edu:8080/read/?forum=bahai-st News - news://list.jccc.edu/bahai-st Public - http://www.escribe.com/religion/bahaist Old Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.net New Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.edu
RE: Baha'i Liberation "Theology" ((long quote))
Dear Mark, Unfortunately you assume incorrectly. The quote ( did not write it) is from Shoghi Effendi, "Directives from the Guardian" 20. See also Ocean: Social Inequality "... Social inequality is the inevitable outcome of the natural inequality of men. Human beings are different in ability and should, therefore, be different in their social and economic standing. Extremes of wealth and poverty should, however, be totally abolished. Those whose brains have contributed to the creation and improvement of the means of production must be fairly rewarded, though these means may be owned and controlled by others." (From a letter written on behalf of Shoghi Effendi to an individual believer, January 26, 1935) 1866. "Equality is a Chimera!" "Equality is a chimera! It is entirely impracticable! Even if equality could be achieved it could not continue -- and if its existence were possible, the whole order of the world be destroyed. The law of order must always obtain in the world of humanity. Heaven has so decreed in the world of humanity. Heaven has so decreed in the creation of man." ('Abdu'l-Bahá: Paris Talks, p. 132, London, 1961 ed.) 550 (Compilations, Lights of Guidance, p. 549) "...The Master has definitely stated that wages should be unequal, simply because that men are unequal in their ability, and hence should receive wages that would correspond to their varying capacities and resources. This view seems to contradict the opinion of some modern economists. But the friends should have full confidence in the words of the Master, and should give preference to His statements over those voiced by our so-called modern thinkers." (From a letter written on behalf of Shoghi Effendi to an individual believer, December 26, 1935) (Compilations, Lights of Guidance, p. 549) Best wishes, Ian Kluge The information contained in this e-mail and any attachments thereto ("e-mail") is sent by the Johnson County Community College ("JCCC") and is intended to be confidential and for the use of only the individual or entity named above. The information may be protected by federal and state privacy and disclosures acts or other legal rules. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are notified that retention, dissemination, distribution or copying of this e-mail is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error please immediately notify JCCC by email reply and immediately and permanently delete this e-mail message and any attachments thereto. Thank you. __ You are subscribed to Baha'i Studies as: mailto:archive@mail-archive.com Unsubscribe: send a blank email to mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Subscribe: send subscribe bahai-st in the message body to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subscribe: http://list.jccc.edu:8080/read/all_forums/subscribe?name=bahai-st Baha'i Studies is available through the following: Mail - mailto:bahai-st@list.jccc.edu Web - http://list.jccc.edu:8080/read/?forum=bahai-st News - news://list.jccc.edu/bahai-st Public - http://www.escribe.com/religion/bahaist Old Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.net New Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.edu
RE: Baha'i Liberation "Theology" ((long quote))
Ian, At 11:30 AM 10/12/2005, you wrote: >>My point is not so much eliminating (or not) social inequality but to show >>that by the Guardian's analysis, all social and economic inequalities are not >>necessarily man-made injustice but simply a reflection of individual >>differences in human nature.<< Where does the Guardian say that? I have never seen any statement which comes even marginally close to what you wrote. I assume, however, that you are thinking of this passage: "...The Master has definitely stated that wages should be unequal, simply because that men are unequal in their ability, and hence should receive wages that would correspond to their varying capacities and resources." -- From a letter written on behalf of Shoghi Effendi to an individual believer, December 26, 1935 (Lights of Guidance, p.550) He is making a statement of principle, not claiming that all the social inequalities we see around us are just. There is a difference between paying people with consideration to their abilities and paying people because of their race, ethnicity, class, or gender. >>IOW, blaming what you call 'corporatocracy' may often be a false analysis of >>an economically or socially unjust situation.<< The corporatocracy, as generally constructed, promotes inequality on the basis of power, wealth, and privilege. I don't see how one can justify such a monster from the Baha'i sources. Via moderna, Mark A. Foster . http://markfoster.net ... [a] word is ... a universal. - William of Ockham Structurization Tech: http://tech.structurization.com The information contained in this e-mail and any attachments thereto ("e-mail") is sent by the Johnson County Community College ("JCCC") and is intended to be confidential and for the use of only the individual or entity named above. The information may be protected by federal and state privacy and disclosures acts or other legal rules. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are notified that retention, dissemination, distribution or copying of this e-mail is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error please immediately notify JCCC by email reply and immediately and permanently delete this e-mail message and any attachments thereto. Thank you. __ You are subscribed to Baha'i Studies as: mailto:archive@mail-archive.com Unsubscribe: send a blank email to mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Subscribe: send subscribe bahai-st in the message body to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subscribe: http://list.jccc.edu:8080/read/all_forums/subscribe?name=bahai-st Baha'i Studies is available through the following: Mail - mailto:bahai-st@list.jccc.edu Web - http://list.jccc.edu:8080/read/?forum=bahai-st News - news://list.jccc.edu/bahai-st Public - http://www.escribe.com/religion/bahaist Old Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.net New Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.edu
RE: Baha'i Liberation "Theology" ((long quote))
Dear Mark, My point is not so much eliminating (or not) social inequality but to show that by the Guardian's analysis, all social and economic inequalities are not necessarily man-made injustice but simply a reflection of individual differences in human nature. IOW, blaming what you call 'corporatocracy' may often be a false analysis of an economically or socially unjust situation. Best wishes, Ian Kluge -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mark A. Foster Sent: October 10, 2005 7:08 AM To: Baha'i Studies Subject: RE: Baha'i Liberation "Theology" ((long quote)) Ian, At 06:59 PM 10/8/2005, you wrote: >>Here's an interesting quote to consider amidst all this corporation bashing: >>"Social inequality is the inevitable outcome of the natural inequality of man. Human beings are different in ability and should, therefore, be different in their social and economic standing. Extremes of wealth and poverty should, however, be abolished... >>-- Shoghi Effendi, Directives from the Guardian" 20 As a Baha'i, I have no interest in eliminating social inequality. The socialism in the Baha'i texts (e.g., houses of finance) does, however, appear to be structured to eliminate the sort of social inequity which is promoted by the corporatocracy. Via moderna, Mark A. Foster . http://markfoster.net ... [a] word is ... a universal. - William of Ockham Structurization Tech: http://tech.structurization.com The information contained in this e-mail and any attachments thereto ("e-mail") is sent by the Johnson County Community College ("JCCC") and is intended to be confidential and for the use of only the individual or entity named above. The information may be protected by federal and state privacy and disclosures acts or other legal rules. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are notified that retention, dissemination, distribution or copying of this e-mail is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error please immediately notify JCCC by email reply and immediately and permanently delete this e-mail message and any attachments thereto. Thank you. __ You are subscribed to Baha'i Studies as: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: send a blank email to mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Subscribe: send subscribe bahai-st in the message body to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subscribe: http://list.jccc.edu:8080/read/all_forums/subscribe?name=bahai-st Baha'i Studies is available through the following: Mail - mailto:bahai-st@list.jccc.edu Web - http://list.jccc.edu:8080/read/?forum=bahai-st News - news://list.jccc.edu/bahai-st Public - http://www.escribe.com/religion/bahaist Old Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.net New Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.edu __ You are subscribed to Baha'i Studies as: mailto:archive@mail-archive.com Unsubscribe: send a blank email to mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Subscribe: send subscribe bahai-st in the message body to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subscribe: http://list.jccc.edu:8080/read/all_forums/subscribe?name=bahai-st Baha'i Studies is available through the following: Mail - mailto:bahai-st@list.jccc.edu Web - http://list.jccc.edu:8080/read/?forum=bahai-st News - news://list.jccc.edu/bahai-st Public - http://www.escribe.com/religion/bahaist Old Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.net New Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.edu
Re: Baha'i Liberation "Theology" ((long quote))
Firestorm, At 02:04 AM 10/9/2005, you wrote: >>now, i can say i am saying "as a Baha'i" i think usa coproations should be >>let lose to dismember anything resembling national idenityt and interest...or >>i can say, i am a member of the Baha'i Faith and as a person involved in >>branding and formations i kinda enjoy the world view ex[ressed in the story >>"rollerball" as a wonderful future in which the proletariat rule by benefit >>of their ension checks as part of the path to be travelled to true social >>justice.<< As a *Baha'i*, I have no problem with national identity and interest. However, as a Marxist sociologist, I do have a problem with hegemony and neocolonialism (whether carried on in the name of universal democratization or something else). If a country needs a commodity, such as oil, to "fuel" (pardon the pun) its economy, and it must, therefore, overthrow other governments in order to obtain that commodity, I would, honestly, rather see that country fall into economic ruin than continue on such a path >>marx and smith, to my dim recall, use relatively similar math in describing >>the process of getting there.<< As I see it, the so-called terrorists (whom I would call "counterterrorists" responding to Western terrorism or imperialism), such as members of the largely fictive al-Qa'ida, have taken on a similar function to the proletarians Marx anticipated in a socialist revolution. That does not mean I support what these Islamists are doing (I definitely do not), but I think I understand, at least from my revisionist Marxist perspective, their role in the present global system. Via moderna, Mark A. Foster . http://markfoster.net ... [a] word is ... a universal. - William of Ockham Structurization Tech: http://tech.structurization.com The information contained in this e-mail and any attachments thereto ("e-mail") is sent by the Johnson County Community College ("JCCC") and is intended to be confidential and for the use of only the individual or entity named above. The information may be protected by federal and state privacy and disclosures acts or other legal rules. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are notified that retention, dissemination, distribution or copying of this e-mail is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error please immediately notify JCCC by email reply and immediately and permanently delete this e-mail message and any attachments thereto. Thank you. __ You are subscribed to Baha'i Studies as: mailto:archive@mail-archive.com Unsubscribe: send a blank email to mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Subscribe: send subscribe bahai-st in the message body to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subscribe: http://list.jccc.edu:8080/read/all_forums/subscribe?name=bahai-st Baha'i Studies is available through the following: Mail - mailto:bahai-st@list.jccc.edu Web - http://list.jccc.edu:8080/read/?forum=bahai-st News - news://list.jccc.edu/bahai-st Public - http://www.escribe.com/religion/bahaist Old Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.net New Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.edu
RE: Baha'i Liberation "Theology" ((long quote))
Ian, At 06:59 PM 10/8/2005, you wrote: >>Here's an interesting quote to consider amidst all this corporation bashing: >>"Social inequality is the inevitable outcome of the natural inequality of >>man. Human beings are different in ability and should, therefore, be >>different in their social and economic standing. Extremes of wealth and >>poverty should, however, be abolished... >>-- Shoghi Effendi, Directives from the Guardian" 20 As a Baha'i, I have no interest in eliminating social inequality. The socialism in the Baha'i texts (e.g., houses of finance) does, however, appear to be structured to eliminate the sort of social inequity which is promoted by the corporatocracy. Via moderna, Mark A. Foster . http://markfoster.net ... [a] word is ... a universal. - William of Ockham Structurization Tech: http://tech.structurization.com The information contained in this e-mail and any attachments thereto ("e-mail") is sent by the Johnson County Community College ("JCCC") and is intended to be confidential and for the use of only the individual or entity named above. The information may be protected by federal and state privacy and disclosures acts or other legal rules. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are notified that retention, dissemination, distribution or copying of this e-mail is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error please immediately notify JCCC by email reply and immediately and permanently delete this e-mail message and any attachments thereto. Thank you. __ You are subscribed to Baha'i Studies as: mailto:archive@mail-archive.com Unsubscribe: send a blank email to mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Subscribe: send subscribe bahai-st in the message body to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subscribe: http://list.jccc.edu:8080/read/all_forums/subscribe?name=bahai-st Baha'i Studies is available through the following: Mail - mailto:bahai-st@list.jccc.edu Web - http://list.jccc.edu:8080/read/?forum=bahai-st News - news://list.jccc.edu/bahai-st Public - http://www.escribe.com/religion/bahaist Old Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.net New Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.edu
RE: Baha'i Liberation "Theology" ((long quote))
Ian, Sorry for the delay, but I wanted to make sure I had enough time to respond to your message. At 03:53 PM 10/6/2005, you wrote: >>I know *a lot* of Serbs and Croatians and they would be stunned by your >>statement that they did not live in a Communist state. So would Milvan Djilas >>(author of the explosive "The New Class: An Analysis of the Communist" >>System [1957])His insider's book was especially focussed on Yugoslavia as a >>Communist state.<< I didn't say that they did not live in a communist state. I suggested that there is no such *thing* as a communist state. There are only particular social constructions (nations) which may have certain observable similarities. Tito, through his political genius, allowed Yugoslavia functioned in both the first and second world. >>Both Tito's Yugoslavia and Sung's North Korea were run on strict >>Marxist/Communist dogma: class struggle, Party as vanguard, historical and >>dialectical materialism etc.<< Where is the class struggle in Kim Il Sung's North Korea? And how did the so-called revolutions and class struggles in certain nations relate to Marx's views? You are, IMO, confusing labels with constructions. >>But I did not say all totalitarian states are communist. China is was and to >>a large extent still totalitarian e.g. does not recognise the difference >>between public and private spheres of existence - which is why it persecutes >>people for private opinions. Religious beliefs and keeps close control of the >>internet.<< That would, as I think would be defined by most political scientists and political sociologists, qualify it as authoritarian, not totalitarian. >>But first they advocated dictatorship of the proletariat - a phase no >>Communist country has ever gotten beyond. The fact is there has never been a >>Communist state which has not also been totalitarian. They are correlates.<< No. It is a stage they never reached. In order to have a dictatorship of the proletariat (socialism), the working class (not some class of intelligentsia which claims to represent them) needs to be in charge. >>And, as I've said before, what person - then or now - with a lick of people >>smarts would ever take the vision of a stateless modern society seriously? >>That was just honey for flies.<< That is ad hominem, i.e. attacking the messenger. There are a lot of very smart people who advocate various interpretations of Bakunin's and Marx's ideas of communism. >>People lived under a particular governments whose policies were guided by the >>work of Marx, Lenin, Stalin etc. Those ideas and works shared a certain >>number of similarities labelled 'Communism.' It could have labelled XYZ but >>the similarities remain.<< The similarities, IMO, were either a result of oppression (the iron curtain) or were mostly linguistic (using the same word to describe North Korea and Yugoslavia or Lenin and Stalin). >>What's important however - and the key issue in this discussion - is the >>fact that the Chinese leadership has recognised that a modern industrialized >>society cannot be built on Marxist/Communist principles.<< I don't believe that a modern industrial society, on the foundations of corporate capitalism, should be built at *all*. Actually, I would like to see it almost completely dismantled (in spite of the suffering which would result). I have no desire to see future generations grow up under the ideologies supporting corporate and political greed. >>Really? He was 'only' the leader of the world's most powerful Communist state >>for 18 years. That's 25% of the span of Communist rule in Russia. I would >>think his words and deeds *very* relevant.<< Not to Trotsky. >>We have more than Trotsky's words - we have his actions and there is nothing >>in his actions to suggest he would have become anything than their heir of >>Lenin vis-à-vis his reliance on terror and force. Trotsky/Stalin? Six of one, >>half-a-dozen of the other.<< Trotsky was not in charge, and it is entirely speculative to comment on the kind of government which might have developed if he ever did hold the reins of power. >>I see we could have a real debate about the nature of perspectivism.<< I adopted what I call perspectivism when I was in graduate school. It is incorporated into my Ph.D. dissertation on pentecostalism. I have no idea how to debate the subject without getting back into the realism-nominalism discussion, which I am not anxious to do. Until about 10 years ago, my perspectivism was a bit essentialistic, i.e., different perspectives on real essences. However, functionally, my views were not so different from what they are right now. >>BTW, this still doesn't make it clear why you dragged Trotsky into the >>conversation.<< Because Trotksy, IMO, was among the finest fruits produced by the communist movement, and we were discussing communism and Marxism. >>Not at all. I don't switch hats/perspectives/viewpoints an
Re: Baha'i Liberation "Theology" ((long quote))
brent, i would add another characterisitic to the qualities of the quasi-person of a corporation...most of the time it doesn;t stop in the middle of a sentence distracted by a secretary's blouse, caffeine or nictoine deficiencies, etc. it has that glorious (and i may be being subtly inflammatory here for my own amusement) blake-like tyger,tyger burning bright, >purpose< that is inherent in it essence, beautiful to behold. how many human beings fully can say what they are on and want to be and how they go about it on one page? and yet the average coproration can, with a good enuff corp lawyer. i have shopped in the ben franklin where sam walton concevied wal-mart (which is, significantly enuff to me, about 10 minutes if u know the backroads from where the bowie knife was forged). and i know the opverty in that town then, and now. it is declining, in real terms, even whie the statisticians claim it's increasining by measuring with relatives rather than absolutes. yes, indeed, if ur in the usa and u hope to have any measure of paper wealth and are not the sole owner of a business, u are a corporate owner. a few months ago i was in a town where a group of rather poor people were waginmg a public relations war against a rather large corporation over payment for ag workers. i was talking to people on picket lines, telling them how to tune their msg. i was trying to get interviews on camera with leaders of this movement, and told them (which in retrospect i nevvver should have done, it's still life's illusions i recall) that it was my intent to also interview the corp middle managers trying to get their own kids thru college by getting that extra penny on the bottom line. that the overall goal was to demonstrate that the corporation was trying to get good returns to give good pensions to the teachers who were wanting a good retirement becuase they were burnt out from teaching the kids of the peole who picked the crops. ..that there is no >them<. this msg was rejected by the picketers and their handlers and bosses. i'm going to tune it and work on massaging my way into presenting it to the coproation next. i offer these little concrete stories since, imho, without such, talk of social justice etc is words. The information contained in this e-mail and any attachments thereto ("e-mail") is sent by the Johnson County Community College ("JCCC") and is intended to be confidential and for the use of only the individual or entity named above. The information may be protected by federal and state privacy and disclosures acts or other legal rules. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are notified that retention, dissemination, distribution or copying of this e-mail is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error please immediately notify JCCC by email reply and immediately and permanently delete this e-mail message and any attachments thereto. Thank you. __ You are subscribed to Baha'i Studies as: mailto:archive@mail-archive.com Unsubscribe: send a blank email to mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Subscribe: send subscribe bahai-st in the message body to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subscribe: http://list.jccc.edu:8080/read/all_forums/subscribe?name=bahai-st Baha'i Studies is available through the following: Mail - mailto:bahai-st@list.jccc.edu Web - http://list.jccc.edu:8080/read/?forum=bahai-st News - news://list.jccc.edu/bahai-st Public - http://www.escribe.com/religion/bahaist Old Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.net New Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.edu
Re: Baha'i Liberation "Theology" ((long quote))
markfoster, first, imho, yeah. totallly. the Baha'i Faith has a clear realisation of the state of the world at any moment. it's inherent, imho, in there being a Baha'i Faith. when i read a doc like centiry of light, or one common Faith, imho i am seeing a statement about the realisation. such comments are however framed far above the dialectic persiflage that usually passes for analytical discourse. now, i can say i am saying "as a Baha'i" i think usa coproations should be let lose to dismember anything resembling national idenityt and interest...or i can say, i am a member of the Baha'i Faith and as a person involved in branding and formations i kinda enjoy the world view ex[ressed in the story "rollerball" as a wonderful future in which the proletariat rule by benefit of their ension checks as part of the path to be travelled to true social justice. marx and smith, to my dim recall, use relatively similar math in describing the process of getting there. this does not make my being a draconian upholder of "brand identity as profit, profit is noble" philosophy a "Baha'i economic philosphy", but rather the economic philosophy of someone trying to become a Baha'i in some deeper sense of the word. when the UHJ or the beloved Guardia describes the process of getting to social justice, and what is the definition of social justice, then it is, imho the Baha'i view of the process. The information contained in this e-mail and any attachments thereto ("e-mail") is sent by the Johnson County Community College ("JCCC") and is intended to be confidential and for the use of only the individual or entity named above. The information may be protected by federal and state privacy and disclosures acts or other legal rules. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are notified that retention, dissemination, distribution or copying of this e-mail is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error please immediately notify JCCC by email reply and immediately and permanently delete this e-mail message and any attachments thereto. Thank you. __ You are subscribed to Baha'i Studies as: mailto:archive@mail-archive.com Unsubscribe: send a blank email to mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Subscribe: send subscribe bahai-st in the message body to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subscribe: http://list.jccc.edu:8080/read/all_forums/subscribe?name=bahai-st Baha'i Studies is available through the following: Mail - mailto:bahai-st@list.jccc.edu Web - http://list.jccc.edu:8080/read/?forum=bahai-st News - news://list.jccc.edu/bahai-st Public - http://www.escribe.com/religion/bahaist Old Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.net New Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.edu
Re: Baha'i Liberation "Theology" ((long quote))
Brent, At 08:29 PM 10/8/2005, you wrote: >>Do you have any life insurance with a cash value? The insurance company has >>invested in the stock market; that's why the value grows.<< Sure, and my taxes have gone to support some large corporations, too. I am not claiming to separate myself from the system. That would be impossible. I shop in Target and Best Buy, watch the SciFi Channel which is has large corporate sponsors (commercials), etc. I want to see the system transformed. I am also not criticizing all individual corporations. Some are more humane than others. I am criticizing the system of corporate power - the corporatocracy. Via moderna, Mark A. Foster . http://markfoster.net ... [a] word is ... a universal. - William of Ockham Structurization Tech: http://tech.structurization.com The information contained in this e-mail and any attachments thereto ("e-mail") is sent by the Johnson County Community College ("JCCC") and is intended to be confidential and for the use of only the individual or entity named above. The information may be protected by federal and state privacy and disclosures acts or other legal rules. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are notified that retention, dissemination, distribution or copying of this e-mail is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error please immediately notify JCCC by email reply and immediately and permanently delete this e-mail message and any attachments thereto. Thank you. __ You are subscribed to Baha'i Studies as: mailto:archive@mail-archive.com Unsubscribe: send a blank email to mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Subscribe: send subscribe bahai-st in the message body to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subscribe: http://list.jccc.edu:8080/read/all_forums/subscribe?name=bahai-st Baha'i Studies is available through the following: Mail - mailto:bahai-st@list.jccc.edu Web - http://list.jccc.edu:8080/read/?forum=bahai-st News - news://list.jccc.edu/bahai-st Public - http://www.escribe.com/religion/bahaist Old Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.net New Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.edu
Re: Baha'i Liberation "Theology" ((long quote))
"I am referring to the American corporatocracy and the corporations which make it up." In my opinion, "corporation" is a buzz-word that creates a response of "evil" in the views of some. I would like to address that. As a lawyer, I have often created corporations for clients. The process is a simple one. A statement of purpose (importing woven hats from Guatemala), a statement of the number of years duration, a statement of where it will function -- these and a few other provisions result in the issuance of a "corporate charter". This is a one-page legal document that says that the state has created a legal person. That is, a fictional person; actually, people still operate it, but on paper this entity exists. The people who form the corporation then transfer assets into it: They create a bank account in the name of the corporation, and put money in it. They transfer title of cars to the corporation. In return they receive "share certificates" that prove their participation as owners. It is a benign process. It is as good, or as harmful a company, as the people who run it; no more and no less. The people running it are exactly as they were before they signed these documents, for better or for worse. And: The people's activities are no more evil than before, merely because they are now a "corporation." But to some, the devil is a corporation. Once you are pasted with this term, you are by definition an evil entity. So that's a small corporation; the same is true for large ones. The people in them operate them. The thing is that when people talk about how corporations do this and that, who are they talking about? Very often, they are talking about themselves. Do you own any stock? Do you have any life insurance with a cash value? The insurance company has invested in the stock market; that's why the value grows. Do you have a pension with your employer? It is invested in the stock market. Do you have a mutual fund? Same thing. The point is: YOU are the owner of America's corporations, if you participate in any of these ways in the economy. And frankly, the attitude of damning the corporations seems to me a very shallow approach to the good and to the harm done by America. The fact that a given organization is a "corporation" means exactly nothing to me, as far as whether it's good or bad. I don't judge a book by its cover, nor a business by its name or formation type. A corporation is just people. Brent The information contained in this e-mail and any attachments thereto ("e-mail") is sent by the Johnson County Community College ("JCCC") and is intended to be confidential and for the use of only the individual or entity named above. The information may be protected by federal and state privacy and disclosures acts or other legal rules. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are notified that retention, dissemination, distribution or copying of this e-mail is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error please immediately notify JCCC by email reply and immediately and permanently delete this e-mail message and any attachments thereto. Thank you. __ You are subscribed to Baha'i Studies as: mailto:archive@mail-archive.com Unsubscribe: send a blank email to mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Subscribe: send subscribe bahai-st in the message body to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subscribe: http://list.jccc.edu:8080/read/all_forums/subscribe?name=bahai-st Baha'i Studies is available through the following: Mail - mailto:bahai-st@list.jccc.edu Web - http://list.jccc.edu:8080/read/?forum=bahai-st News - news://list.jccc.edu/bahai-st Public - http://www.escribe.com/religion/bahaist Old Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.net New Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.edu
RE: Baha'i Liberation "Theology" ((long quote))
Here's an interesting quote to consider amidst all this corporation bashing: "Social inequality is the inevitable outcome of the natural inequality of man. Human beings are different in ability and should, therefore, be different in their social and economic standing. Extremes of wealth and poverty should, however, be abolished... -- Shoghi Effendi, Directives from the Guardian" 20 Best wishes, Ian Kluge -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mark A. Foster Sent: October 8, 2005 6:35 AM To: Baha'i Studies Subject: Re: Baha'i Liberation "Theology" ((long quote)) Firestorm, At 01:39 AM 10/8/2005, you wrote: >>so long as they do not mistake their passions for understandings of the Faith's view of the state of the world.<< Does the Baha'i Faith have an "understanding" of the state of the world? Via moderna, Mark A. Foster . http://markfoster.net ... [a] word is ... a universal. - William of Ockham Structurization Tech: http://tech.structurization.com The information contained in this e-mail and any attachments thereto ("e-mail") is sent by the Johnson County Community College ("JCCC") and is intended to be confidential and for the use of only the individual or entity named above. The information may be protected by federal and state privacy and disclosures acts or other legal rules. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are notified that retention, dissemination, distribution or copying of this e-mail is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error please immediately notify JCCC by email reply and immediately and permanently delete this e-mail message and any attachments thereto. Thank you. __ You are subscribed to Baha'i Studies as: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: send a blank email to mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Subscribe: send subscribe bahai-st in the message body to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subscribe: http://list.jccc.edu:8080/read/all_forums/subscribe?name=bahai-st Baha'i Studies is available through the following: Mail - mailto:bahai-st@list.jccc.edu Web - http://list.jccc.edu:8080/read/?forum=bahai-st News - news://list.jccc.edu/bahai-st Public - http://www.escribe.com/religion/bahaist Old Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.net New Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.edu __ You are subscribed to Baha'i Studies as: mailto:archive@mail-archive.com Unsubscribe: send a blank email to mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Subscribe: send subscribe bahai-st in the message body to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subscribe: http://list.jccc.edu:8080/read/all_forums/subscribe?name=bahai-st Baha'i Studies is available through the following: Mail - mailto:bahai-st@list.jccc.edu Web - http://list.jccc.edu:8080/read/?forum=bahai-st News - news://list.jccc.edu/bahai-st Public - http://www.escribe.com/religion/bahaist Old Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.net New Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.edu
Re: Baha'i Liberation "Theology" ((long quote))
Firestorm, At 01:39 AM 10/8/2005, you wrote: >>so long as they do not mistake their passions for understandings of the >>Faith's view of the state of the world.<< Does the Baha'i Faith have an "understanding" of the state of the world? Via moderna, Mark A. Foster . http://markfoster.net ... [a] word is ... a universal. - William of Ockham Structurization Tech: http://tech.structurization.com The information contained in this e-mail and any attachments thereto ("e-mail") is sent by the Johnson County Community College ("JCCC") and is intended to be confidential and for the use of only the individual or entity named above. The information may be protected by federal and state privacy and disclosures acts or other legal rules. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are notified that retention, dissemination, distribution or copying of this e-mail is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error please immediately notify JCCC by email reply and immediately and permanently delete this e-mail message and any attachments thereto. Thank you. __ You are subscribed to Baha'i Studies as: mailto:archive@mail-archive.com Unsubscribe: send a blank email to mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Subscribe: send subscribe bahai-st in the message body to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subscribe: http://list.jccc.edu:8080/read/all_forums/subscribe?name=bahai-st Baha'i Studies is available through the following: Mail - mailto:bahai-st@list.jccc.edu Web - http://list.jccc.edu:8080/read/?forum=bahai-st News - news://list.jccc.edu/bahai-st Public - http://www.escribe.com/religion/bahaist Old Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.net New Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.edu
Re: Baha'i Liberation "Theology" ((long quote))
as somebody who is by trade a pirate, who worked for chavez's people in chicago at the same time committing various felonies against local 710 of the teamsters, and committing felony assault on an afl/cio union guard in the rpesece of chicago police, who turned and shurgged on the basis that whatever was ghoing on with the guy after the other guy with a foot long knife it as obviously union business, and therefore none of the city's i look at this conversation about trotsky/nafta/child labour with a certain"ok i bet all u people work for the state in acadaemia or something" kind of incredulity. there are, imho 2 kinds of revolutions, the meat and the heart. the one is done by using the muzzle of a gun for verbiage. the other by slow transformation. i just got thru interviewing a half dozen people who were in dc last week to get their fair share of abuse (mick jagger) and not >one< of them could give me a coherent reason to have gone, beyond purchasing with their time and money the sense of having "been there for soemthing" --and 66% agreed that woodstcok would have been more value for the time/money. i would offer that transnational corporations are part of the solution to a deified nationalism. i would offer that the transnational which empowers a father to sell his child to a show factory rather than a brothel is empowering the child. i would ofer, concretely, that one of the world's largest coporations had for years a baord advisory member, a lawyer, child ac tivist and proclaimer of the eed for education, whose entire function was to prevent child labour, and therefore felt satisfied it had accomplished something, was a corproate coitizen... and she got a nice check. i would offer that a Baha'i liberation theology >might< be based on transorming the hearts of consumers to a view that their self-interest was not served by ignoring the suffering of others. it >might< be based on valuing people w/o the bach degree as >people< and not parts of a social machine by actually acting like service is worship. and i would definitely offer that individual Baha'is have amoral duty to act out on what mves them, so long as they do not mistake their passions for understandings of the Faith's view of the state of the world. but, imho historically, other types of admixture or synthesis are about as likely to prosper as carrying an ice ax to bed in mexico city. The information contained in this e-mail and any attachments thereto ("e-mail") is sent by the Johnson County Community College ("JCCC") and is intended to be confidential and for the use of only the individual or entity named above. The information may be protected by federal and state privacy and disclosures acts or other legal rules. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are notified that retention, dissemination, distribution or copying of this e-mail is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error please immediately notify JCCC by email reply and immediately and permanently delete this e-mail message and any attachments thereto. Thank you. __ You are subscribed to Baha'i Studies as: mailto:archive@mail-archive.com Unsubscribe: send a blank email to mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Subscribe: send subscribe bahai-st in the message body to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subscribe: http://list.jccc.edu:8080/read/all_forums/subscribe?name=bahai-st Baha'i Studies is available through the following: Mail - mailto:bahai-st@list.jccc.edu Web - http://list.jccc.edu:8080/read/?forum=bahai-st News - news://list.jccc.edu/bahai-st Public - http://www.escribe.com/religion/bahaist Old Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.net New Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.edu
Re: Baha'i Liberation "Theology" ((long quote))
Dean, At 12:14 AM 10/7/2005, you wrote: >>Perhaps Mark means net importer.<< I am referring to the American corporatocracy and the corporations which make it up. Via moderna, Mark A. Foster . http://markfoster.net ... [a] word is ... a universal. - William of Ockham Structurization Tech: http://tech.structurization.com The information contained in this e-mail and any attachments thereto ("e-mail") is sent by the Johnson County Community College ("JCCC") and is intended to be confidential and for the use of only the individual or entity named above. The information may be protected by federal and state privacy and disclosures acts or other legal rules. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are notified that retention, dissemination, distribution or copying of this e-mail is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error please immediately notify JCCC by email reply and immediately and permanently delete this e-mail message and any attachments thereto. Thank you. __ You are subscribed to Baha'i Studies as: mailto:archive@mail-archive.com Unsubscribe: send a blank email to mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Subscribe: send subscribe bahai-st in the message body to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subscribe: http://list.jccc.edu:8080/read/all_forums/subscribe?name=bahai-st Baha'i Studies is available through the following: Mail - mailto:bahai-st@list.jccc.edu Web - http://list.jccc.edu:8080/read/?forum=bahai-st News - news://list.jccc.edu/bahai-st Public - http://www.escribe.com/religion/bahaist Old Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.net New Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.edu
Re: Baha'i Liberation "Theology" ((long quote))
>>"Importers, such as the U.S., have little incentive to protest; and any outrage is drowned out by the demand for cheaper goods" >Mark, please clarify. I doubt there is a nation on the planet that is not an importer. Perhaps Mark means net importer. The information contained in this e-mail and any attachments thereto ("e-mail") is sent by the Johnson County Community College ("JCCC") and is intended to be confidential and for the use of only the individual or entity named above. The information may be protected by federal and state privacy and disclosures acts or other legal rules. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are notified that retention, dissemination, distribution or copying of this e-mail is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error please immediately notify JCCC by email reply and immediately and permanently delete this e-mail message and any attachments thereto. Thank you. __ You are subscribed to Baha'i Studies as: mailto:archive@mail-archive.com Unsubscribe: send a blank email to mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Subscribe: send subscribe bahai-st in the message body to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subscribe: http://list.jccc.edu:8080/read/all_forums/subscribe?name=bahai-st Baha'i Studies is available through the following: Mail - mailto:bahai-st@list.jccc.edu Web - http://list.jccc.edu:8080/read/?forum=bahai-st News - news://list.jccc.edu/bahai-st Public - http://www.escribe.com/religion/bahaist Old Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.net New Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.edu
Re: Baha'i Liberation "Theology"
>What did you have in mind as a means of freeing the poor from oppressive capitalism? >I'll later return to the question of why are you limiting this to the adverse effects of capitalism, not >addressing the other "isms" that also grievously harm people. But I'm primarily interested in what you >think could be done, and what means used. We can address the other "isms", perhaps starting with materialism which seems to be both a cause and an effect of unbridled capitalism. The spirit that sent forth, not so long ago, in such rapid succession, so many pioneers to such remote areas of the globe, must at all costs and above everything else, be recaptured, for the twofold purpose of swelling the number, and of ensuring the continual flow, of pioneers, so essential for the safeguarding of the prizes won in the course of the several campaigns of a world-girdling Crusade, and of combatting the evil forces which a relentless and all-pervasive materialism, the cancerous growth of militant racialism, political corruption, unbridled capitalism, wide-spread lawlessness and gross immorality, are, alas, unleashing, with ominous swiftness, amongst various classes of the society to which the members of this community belong. (Shoghi Effendi: Citadel of Faith, Page: 154) No, Baha'u'llah did not bring a complete system of economics to the world. Profit sharing is recommended as a solution to one form of economic problems. There is nothing in the teachings against some kind of capitalism; its present form, though, would require adjustments to be made." (Shoghi Effendi: Directives of the Guardian, Page: 20) The information contained in this e-mail and any attachments thereto ("e-mail") is sent by the Johnson County Community College ("JCCC") and is intended to be confidential and for the use of only the individual or entity named above. The information may be protected by federal and state privacy and disclosures acts or other legal rules. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are notified that retention, dissemination, distribution or copying of this e-mail is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error please immediately notify JCCC by email reply and immediately and permanently delete this e-mail message and any attachments thereto. Thank you. __ You are subscribed to Baha'i Studies as: mailto:archive@mail-archive.com Unsubscribe: send a blank email to mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Subscribe: send subscribe bahai-st in the message body to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subscribe: http://list.jccc.edu:8080/read/all_forums/subscribe?name=bahai-st Baha'i Studies is available through the following: Mail - mailto:bahai-st@list.jccc.edu Web - http://list.jccc.edu:8080/read/?forum=bahai-st News - news://list.jccc.edu/bahai-st Public - http://www.escribe.com/religion/bahaist Old Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.net New Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.edu
RE: Baha'i Liberation "Theology" ((long quote))
Brent, At 09:52 PM 10/6/2005, you wrote: >>Mark, please clarify. I doubt there is a nation on the planet that is not an >>importer.<< By importers, I am referring to corporate capitalists and transnational corporations, i.e., the corporatocracy (corporate power). The U.S. is the global center of corporate capitalism, the primary sponsor of the WTO, etc. >>To remedy the abuses of migrant agricultural workers, the U.S. Congress >>passed a law requiring the field owner to get an "H-2A" visa for its >>temporary agricultural workers, say, 100 people to pick lettuce. The process >>to get visas for these 100 workers requires the following:<< IMO, they are just bandaids. Mexicans are streaming into the U.S. to take low-end jobs. Some of those jobs are on farms in California. A recent survey found that more than 50% of Mexicans, if given the choice, would move to the U.S. NAFTA and related measures have created a new underclass. >>So the growers, who would pay the fees if it was a viable process, instead >>just revert back to hiring the people illegally. The remedy, though >>well-intentioned, is just too burdensome, I am told.<< Yes, and governments often look the other way - just as they are doing with illegal immigrants. IMO, these problems can only be solved in the context of a just, globalized, socialized economy. Via moderna, Mark A. Foster . http://markfoster.net ... [a] word is ... a universal. - William of Ockham Structurization Tech: http://tech.structurization.com The information contained in this e-mail and any attachments thereto ("e-mail") is sent by the Johnson County Community College ("JCCC") and is intended to be confidential and for the use of only the individual or entity named above. The information may be protected by federal and state privacy and disclosures acts or other legal rules. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are notified that retention, dissemination, distribution or copying of this e-mail is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error please immediately notify JCCC by email reply and immediately and permanently delete this e-mail message and any attachments thereto. Thank you. __ You are subscribed to Baha'i Studies as: mailto:archive@mail-archive.com Unsubscribe: send a blank email to mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Subscribe: send subscribe bahai-st in the message body to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subscribe: http://list.jccc.edu:8080/read/all_forums/subscribe?name=bahai-st Baha'i Studies is available through the following: Mail - mailto:bahai-st@list.jccc.edu Web - http://list.jccc.edu:8080/read/?forum=bahai-st News - news://list.jccc.edu/bahai-st Public - http://www.escribe.com/religion/bahaist Old Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.net New Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.edu
re: Baha'i Liberation "Theology"
Brent, At 09:44 PM 10/6/2005, you wrote: >>What did you have in mind as a means of freeing the poor from oppressive >>capitalism?<< Here is what I wrote in one of my papers: "Briefly, a category of praxis which might be immediately utilized in service projects for Structurization Tech would involve an active participation in social and economic development. Opportunities for volunteerism could run the gambit from working for non-profit agencies assisting low-income families and individuals to, conceivably, providing aid to victims of natural and man-made disasters, especially the poor, should they become displaced to, perhaps even more ambitiously, planning and constructing intentional communities for the poor and disenfranchised." >>I'll later return to the question of why are you limiting this to the adverse >>effects of capitalism, not addressing the other "isms" that also grievously >>harm people. But I'm primarily interested in what you think could be done, >>and what means used.<< I accept the Marxist premise that other isms (racism, sexism, militarism, state terrorism, classism, ageism, ableism, etc.) operate within the matrix of capitalism. Via moderna, Mark A. Foster . http://markfoster.net ... [a] word is ... a universal. - William of Ockham Structurization Tech: http://tech.structurization.com The information contained in this e-mail and any attachments thereto ("e-mail") is sent by the Johnson County Community College ("JCCC") and is intended to be confidential and for the use of only the individual or entity named above. The information may be protected by federal and state privacy and disclosures acts or other legal rules. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are notified that retention, dissemination, distribution or copying of this e-mail is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error please immediately notify JCCC by email reply and immediately and permanently delete this e-mail message and any attachments thereto. Thank you. __ You are subscribed to Baha'i Studies as: mailto:archive@mail-archive.com Unsubscribe: send a blank email to mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Subscribe: send subscribe bahai-st in the message body to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subscribe: http://list.jccc.edu:8080/read/all_forums/subscribe?name=bahai-st Baha'i Studies is available through the following: Mail - mailto:bahai-st@list.jccc.edu Web - http://list.jccc.edu:8080/read/?forum=bahai-st News - news://list.jccc.edu/bahai-st Public - http://www.escribe.com/religion/bahaist Old Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.net New Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.edu
RE: Baha'i Liberation "Theology" ((long quote))
"Importers, such as the U.S., have little incentive to protest; and any outrage is drowned out by the demand for cheaper goods" Mark, please clarify. I doubt there is a nation on the planet that is not an importer. "Well, the economic abuse of migrant workers is still going on." To remedy the abuses of migrant agricultural workers, the U.S. Congress passed a law requiring the field owner to get an "H-2A" visa for its temporary agricultural workers, say, 100 people to pick lettuce. The process to get visas for these 100 workers requires the following: Determine from the state economist the "prevailing wage" paid to US workers in that sector, and agree to match that wage Advertise for American workers for a period of time The Labor Department then certifies that the salary offered is correct, and that no US workers applied. The employer then needs: A certificate from the Department of Transportation that the buses carrying the workers to the fields are in proper shape A certificate from the Food and Drug Administration that the food being provided to the workers is nutritious A certificate from the Department of Housing and Urban Development that the lodging provided is habitable A certificate from the Environmental Protection Agency that proper safeguards are provided against pesticides and fertilizers Certificates from the Department of Health, etc. etc. -- in all about a dozen such certificates. All of these require that an inspector come to the facility and view the food, the water, the lodging, the buses, the equipment, etc. And this cannot be done ahead of time, it must be within a strict time frame. And all of this time -- the lettuce is in the field approaching the stage where it rots. I do not handle these visas, they are far too complex, and I only know two immigration lawyers who do. One charges 15 thousand dollars, and the other, 20 thousand dollars. They take a huge amount of time, and these applications, certificates, advertisements, and inspections all must be feathered together within a tolerance of a few days. If one step is missed, the entire process is invalidated and no visas issued to the workers. Requiring all of these inspections is surely the result of the abuses of migrant workers for decades. However, the response is so onerous, and the time frame so short, and some of the requirements so needless (Americans are not applying for the job, yet the advertising must be done anyway) that the end result is that often, there is insufficient time to get the visas in time to save the harvest. So the growers, who would pay the fees if it was a viable process, instead just revert back to hiring the people illegally. The remedy, though well-intentioned, is just too burdensome, I am told. And once the worker works illegally, and lives in the USA illegally for more than one year, even if the worker later qualifies for a visa, he or she is required to leave the USA for ten years before being permitted to get a visa. Often these workers are the most valuable employees -- they don't call in sick, they are trustworthy, I have heard dozens of employers tell me that their employees they just found out are illegal, are far and away their best employees. And there is no remedy for them; they are not allowed to get lawful visas, unless they marry a US citizen. But based on employment alone -- nothing can be done for them. They are effectively sentenced to a lifetime "under the table." Brent The information contained in this e-mail and any attachments thereto ("e-mail") is sent by the Johnson County Community College ("JCCC") and is intended to be confidential and for the use of only the individual or entity named above. The information may be protected by federal and state privacy and disclosures acts or other legal rules. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are notified that retention, dissemination, distribution or copying of this e-mail is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error please immediately notify JCCC by email reply and immediately and permanently delete this e-mail message and any attachments thereto. Thank you. __ You are subscribed to Baha'i Studies as: mailto:archive@mail-archive.com Unsubscribe: send a blank email to mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Subscribe: send subscribe bahai-st in the message body to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subscribe: http://list.jccc.edu:8080/read/all_forums/subscribe?name=bahai-st Baha'i Studies is available through the following: Mail - mailto:bahai-st@list.jccc.edu Web - http://list.jccc.edu:8080/read/?forum=bahai-st News - news://list.jccc.edu/bahai-st Public - http://www.escribe.com/religion/bahaist Old Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.net New Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.edu
re: Baha'i Liberation "Theology"
>>In a Baha'i liberation "theology," what role, if any, should Baha'is play in >>freeing the poor from oppressive capitalism? Will we be judged if we do not?>> What did you have in mind as a means of freeing the poor from oppressive capitalism? I'll later return to the question of why are you limiting this to the adverse effects of capitalism, not addressing the other "isms" that also grievously harm people. But I'm primarily interested in what you think could be done, and what means used. Brent The information contained in this e-mail and any attachments thereto ("e-mail") is sent by the Johnson County Community College ("JCCC") and is intended to be confidential and for the use of only the individual or entity named above. The information may be protected by federal and state privacy and disclosures acts or other legal rules. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are notified that retention, dissemination, distribution or copying of this e-mail is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error please immediately notify JCCC by email reply and immediately and permanently delete this e-mail message and any attachments thereto. Thank you. __ You are subscribed to Baha'i Studies as: mailto:archive@mail-archive.com Unsubscribe: send a blank email to mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Subscribe: send subscribe bahai-st in the message body to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subscribe: http://list.jccc.edu:8080/read/all_forums/subscribe?name=bahai-st Baha'i Studies is available through the following: Mail - mailto:bahai-st@list.jccc.edu Web - http://list.jccc.edu:8080/read/?forum=bahai-st News - news://list.jccc.edu/bahai-st Public - http://www.escribe.com/religion/bahaist Old Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.net New Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.edu
RE: Baha'i Liberation "Theology" ((long quote))
Dear mark, You write: "Harmonization" can be defined in different ways; and "uniformity" is one of those definitions. It may sound nice to say that we should not work at cross-purposes. However, I have *frequently* seen terms such as "unified action" misused to suppress diversity and individual initiative and to impose uniformity." I agree, that *can* happen - but we're talking in a Baha’i context here and I think the Universal house of Justice is fully able to comprehend and implement the difference between harmonisation as uniformity and harmonisation as co-ordination of various methodologies. You write: "I see no "crucial areas of similarity" between Marshall Tito's Yugoslavia and Kim Il Sung's North Korea - only superficial ones." I know *a lot* of Serbs and Croatians and they would be stunned by your statement that they did not live in a Communist state. So would Milvan Djilas (author of the explosive "The New Class: An Analysis of the Communist" System [1957])His insider's book was especially focussed on Yugoslavia as a Communist state. Both Tito's Yugoslavia and Sung's North Korea were run on strict Marxist/Communist dogma: class struggle, Party as vanguard, historical and dialectical materialism etc. You write: "You have simply provided a definition: Communist states are totalitarian. Well, modern mainland China is not totalitarian. Using conventional definitions, it would be authoritarian. " But I did not say all totalitarian states are communist. China is was and to a large extent still totalitarian e.g. does not recognise the difference between public and private spheres of existence - which is why it persecutes people for private opinions. Religious beliefs and keeps close control of the internet. Although China *was* fully Communist (and totalitarian) it is, as I have said before, in the process of dismantling Communism - although it is still trying to hang on to the totalitarian aspect of Communism. You write: "And Karl Marx did not advocate totalitarianism either. His (and Engels') view of "communism" was a classless, stateless society (succeeding socialism)." But first they advocated dictatorship of the proletariat - a phase no Communist country has ever gotten beyond. The fact is there has never been a Communist state which has not also been totalitarian. They are correlates. And, as I've said before, what person - then or now - with a lick of people smarts would ever take the vision of a stateless modern society seriously? That was just honey for flies. You write: "Well, now we are going back to our realism-nominalism discussion. I don't think we will likely agree on that subject. People did not live under communism. They lived under particular governments. Certain people decided, on the basis of their own standards of evaluation, to place those governments under the same category." People lived under a particular governments whose policies were guided by the work of Marx, Lenin, Stalin etc. Those ideas and works shared a certain number of similarities labelled 'Communism.' It could have labelled XYZ but the similarities remain. You write: "Actually, Maoist communism was frequently very successful (though not by the standards of some Westerners). Personally, I would like to see the Chinese government renew many of Mao's ideas (before his paranoia about the Soviet Union, etc., and other factors, led him to embark on his cultural revolution). Instead, they are creating a synthesis of corporate capitalism and Confucianism. The peasants are being disenfranchised." Like the "Great Leap Forward" maybe, with its app. 30 million famine victims? (http://66.102.7.104/search?q=cache:GZJAVj8ap1gJ:www.mindground.net/glp.html+The+great+leap+forward&hl=en) What's important however - and the key issue in this discussion - is the fact that the Chinese leadership has recognised that a modern industrialized society cannot be built on Marxist/Communist principles. You write: >>That's what he and his followers *claimed* - but then they stood to be the new ruling class. Nothing in T's record encourages us to take these claims at face value. A corrupt leader like Brezshnev also claimed to be empowering the proletariat.<< "What Brezshnev said or did is not relevant. We only have Trotsky's words to go on, since he was forced into exile and murdered. He never had the chance to prove himself as the Communist leader." Really? He was 'only' the leader of the world's most powerful Communist state for 18 years. That's 25% of the span of Communist rule in Russia. I would think his words and deeds *very* relevant. We have more than Trotsky's words - we have his actions and there is nothing in his actions to suggest he would have become anything than their heir of Lenin vis-à-vis his reliance on terror and force. Trotsky/Stalin? Six of one, half-a-dozen of the other. You write:
RE: Baha'i Liberation "Theology" ((long quote))
Ian, At 04:47 PM 10/5/2005, you wrote: >>I said harmonization - which some might regard as uniformity. However, >>methods must not work at cross-purposes.<< Yes, you wrote: "The methodologies do not need to be 'uniform' but they must harmonise and cannot work at cross-purposes. I suppose one might regard that harmonization as a kind of uniformity." "Harmonization" can be defined in different ways; and "uniformity" is one of those definitions. It may sound nice to say that we should not work at cross-purposes. However, I have *frequently* seen terms such as "unified action" misused to suppress diversity and individual initiative and to impose uniformity. >>I disagree. There is variety and diversity within Communism but there are >>also crucial areas of similarity.<< I see no "crucial areas of similarity" between Marshall Tito's Yugoslavia and Kim Il Sung's North Korea - only superficial ones. >>Their survival is not the issue here. The point is they are Communist states, >>and like all communist states, totalitarian.<< You have simply provided a definition: Communist states are totalitarian. Well, modern mainland China is not totalitarian. Using conventional definitions, it would be authoritarian. And Karl Marx did not advocate totalitarianism either. His (and Engels') view of "communism" was a classless, stateless society (succeeding socialism). >>Well, I'm an essentialist after all. Of course there is such an ideology we >>call Communism: ask the billions who have lived under it.<< Well, now we are going back to our realism-nominalism discussion. I don't think we will likely agree on that subject. People did not live under communism. They lived under particular governments. Certain people decided, on the basis of their own standards of evaluation, to place those governments under the same category. >>That's beside the point. The point is that China has realised that Communism >>simply doesn't work as an economic/social system and is moving away from it >>step by step.<< Actually, Maoist communism was frequently very successful (though not by the standards of some Westerners). Personally, I would like to see the Chinese government renew many of Mao's ideas (before his paranoia about the Soviet Union, etc., and other factors, led him to embark on his cultural revolution). Instead, they are creating a synthesis of corporate capitalism and Confucianism. The peasants are being disenfranchised. >>That's what he and his followers *claimed* - but then they stood to be the >>new ruling class. Nothing in T's record encourages us to take these claims >>at face value. A corrupt leader like Brezshnev also claimed to be empowering >>the proletariat.<< What Brezshnev said or did is not relevant. We only have Trotsky's words to go on, since he was forced into exile and murdered. He never had the chance to prove himself as the Communist leader. >>But you did bring in Marxism and Trotsky several times in a Bahai context and >>that naturally raises the question, 'Why?'<< I bring it up because of my perspectivism (in some cases, to illustrate it). I have no problem holding several radically different, contradictory, and apparently unconnected points of view in my mind simultaneously. IMO, they are all just relative narratives. >>Could you do us a favour, please? When you speak as a Baha'i preface the >>remark with a '(B)' and when you speak as a sociologist with an '(S)'. That >>would clarify your communications and help us understand what you are trying >>to say.<< Ian, I could say the same to you. When you speak about your "common sense realism," put an "R" and a "B" when you are speaking of the Baha'i Faith. ;-) >>That's beside the point. The fact is, Marx's claim was not to be taken >>seriously by anyone (not just Communist leaders) since the withering away of >>the state is as childishly naïve as the claim that a man could be a hunter in >>the morning, a fisherman in the afternoon, a shepherd in the evening and a >>critic after supper.<< I agree it is impractical and overly idealistic - not that it is exactly naive. The principal difference between Marx and Engels' communism and Bakunin's communism is that the latter rejected the prerequisite of socialism (the instrumentality of the state). If you remove the socialism from Marx and Engels' views, you have anarchism. >>Anyone with two licks worth of common sense knows this is rubbish.<< There are a lot of people, with a great deal of common sense, who, even now, are working toward socialism (with communism as the ultimate objective). Two of those people are my colleagues in the Sociology Department. Because I am a Baha'i, and cannot participate in these activities, my use of Marxism is more methodological (dialectical materialism) than practical. However, my own view is that a global revolution *is* occurring right now. Marx was correct about the revolution but wrong about what it would look
RE: Baha'i Liberation "Theology" ((long quote))
Dear Mark, "Uniformity is, IMO, entirely inconsistent with the principle of unity in diversity. How can you justify any kind of uniformity from the Baha'i sources?" I said harmonization - which some might regard as uniformity. However, methods must not work at cross-purposes. You write: "There is no "it." Communism is simply a name; and the various communisms which developed have little similarity, except in vocabulary, with Marx's views." I disagree. There is variety and diversity within Communism but there are also crucial areas of similarity. You write re Cuba and N. Vietnam: "Those are two of the places I mentioned. However, from everything I have seen, I doubt that they will survive, as dictatorships, for another generation." Their survival is not the issue here. The point is they are Communist states, and like all communist states, totalitarian. You write: "Again, you are "essentializing," to use Popper's term, a category. There is no such *thing* as communism." Well, I'm an essentialist after all. Of course there is such an ideology we call Communism: ask the billions who have lived under it. You write: "Capitalism in China is cementing the divide between the new class of industrialists and the peasants." That's beside the point. The point is that China has realised that Communism simply doesn't work as an economic/social system and is moving away from it step by step. You write: "It was not "his own." Trotsky wanted to see a worker's revolution and dictatorship." That's what he and his followers *claimed* - but then they stood to be the new ruling class. Nothing in T's record encourages us to take these claims at face value. A corrupt leader like Brezshnev also claimed to be empowering the proletariat. You write: "I do not connect Marxism with the Baha'i Faith. When I refer to Marxism, I am not speaking as a Baha'i but as a critical sociologist." But you did bring in Marxism and Trotsky several times in a Bahai context and that naturally raises the question, 'Why?' Could you do us a favour, please? When you speak as a Baha'i preface the remark with a '(B)' and when you speak as a sociologist with an '(S)'. That would clarify your communications and help us understand what you are trying to say. You write: "Engels was not a politician. He was a revolutionary and an author. He was not responsible for what other people did in his and Marx's names." That's beside the point. The fact is, Marx's claim was not to be taken seriously by anyone (not just Communist leaders) since the withering away of the state is as childishly naïve as the claim that a man could be a hunter in the morning, a fisherman in the afternoon, a shepherd in the evening and a critic after supper. Anyone with two licks worth of common sense knows this is rubbish. You write: "I have said many times on this list that I do not. There may be some connections. I have read papers which have attempted to explore them. However, *all* of them struck me as academically weak and poorly constructed." So why did you bring the Communists and Trotsky in to begin with? What was that all about? You write: "I don't know what else I can do except to repeat that I am not advocating partisan political activity. I have said so many times. However, I am not going to abandon Marxism and post-Marxism because some people want to read into my comments their own viewpoints." So you want to keep using a private language . . .? You're free to do so but it won't help other people understand what you're trying to say. You write: "Lenin *tried* to follow Marx in some areas. Stalin simply threw Marx out the window and retained only the vocabulary. (It was that vocabulary which Stalin shared with Lenin.) In Stalin's Soviet Union, Marx and Engels would likely have ended up in a gulag." Yes, these the myths that defenders of Marxism try to promulgate in an effort to distance themselves from Lenin, Stalin, Krushchev, Mao, Castro, Pol Pot etc etc etc. At some point, however, they have to wake up a smell the coffee: if all attempts to apply Marx's ideas have gone so horribly wrong, maybe there is something horribly wrong with Marx's ideas. You write: "They can say so, but you would not be able to find anything in Marx which would have justified it. The proletariat was oppressed in the Soviet Union, and no amount of spinning by the Politburo or Pravda could change that." They did say so and they extracted this idea of the revolutionary vanguard from Marx's writings and actions. Marx kicked Bakunin out of the International in order to to achieve ideologically uniformity/cohesion within the Communist Party so that he and his inner cadre could promote the interests of the working class. Marx also learned that lesson from the Paris Commune: without a disciplined party leading them, the proletariat was unable to work effectively towards its own best interests. You write: "However, this is a Baha'i Studies
RE: Baha'i Liberation "Theology" ((long quote))
Dear Mark, You write: "Uniformity is, IMO, entirely inconsistent with the principle of unity in diversity. How can you justify any kind of uniformity from the Baha'i sources?" I said harmonization - which some might regard as uniformity. However, methods must not work at cross-purposes. You write: "There is no "it." Communism is simply a name; and the various communisms which developed have little similarity, except in vocabulary, with Marx's views." I disagree. There is variety and diversity within Communism but there are also crucial areas of similarity. You write re Cuba and N. Vietnam: "Those are two of the places I mentioned. However, from everything I have seen, I doubt that they will survive, as dictatorships, for another generation." Their survival is not the issue here. The point is they are Communist states, and like all communist states, totalitarian. You write: "Again, you are "essentializing," to use Popper's term, a category. There is no such *thing* as communism." Well, I'm an essentialist after all. Of course there is such an ideology we call Communism: ask the billions who have lived under it. You write: "Capitalism in China is cementing the divide between the new class of industrialists and the peasants." That's beside the point. The point is that China has realised that Communism simply doesn't work as an economic/social system and is moving away from it step by step. You write: "It was not "his own." Trotsky wanted to see a worker's revolution and dictatorship." That's what he and his followers *claimed* - but then they stood to be the new ruling class. Nothing in T's record encourages us to take these claims at face value. A corrupt leader like Brezshnev also claimed to be empowering the proletariat. You write: "I do not connect Marxism with the Baha'i Faith. When I refer to Marxism, I am not speaking as a Baha'i but as a critical sociologist." But you did bring in Marxism and Trotsky several times in a Bahai context and that naturally raises the question, 'Why?' Could you do us a favour, please? When you speak as a Baha'i preface the remark with a '(B)' and when you speak as a sociologist with an '(S)'. That would clarify your communications and help us understand what you are trying to say. You write: "Engels was not a politician. He was a revolutionary and an author. He was not responsible for what other people did in his and Marx's names." That's beside the point. The fact is, Marx's claim was not to be taken seriously by anyone (not just Communist leaders) since the withering away of the state is as childishly naïve as the claim that a man could be a hunter in the morning, a fisherman in the afternoon, a shepherd in the evening and a critic after supper. Anyone with two licks worth of common sense knows this is rubbish. You write: "I have said many times on this list that I do not. There may be some connections. I have read papers which have attempted to explore them. However, *all* of them struck me as academically weak and poorly constructed." So why did you bring the Communists and Trotsky in to begin with? What was that all about? You write: "I don't know what else I can do except to repeat that I am not advocating partisan political activity. I have said so many times. However, I am not going to abandon Marxism and post-Marxism because some people want to read into my comments their own viewpoints." So you want to keep using a private language . . .? You're free to do so but it won't help other people understand what you're trying to say. You write: "Lenin *tried* to follow Marx in some areas. Stalin simply threw Marx out the window and retained only the vocabulary. (It was that vocabulary which Stalin shared with Lenin.) In Stalin's Soviet Union, Marx and Engels would likely have ended up in a gulag." Yes, these the myths that defenders of Marxism try to promulgate in an effort to distance themselves from Lenin, Stalin, Krushchev, Mao, Castro, Pol Pot etc etc etc. At some point, however, they have to wake up a smell the coffee: if all attempts to apply Marx's ideas have gone so horribly wrong, maybe there is something horribly wrong with Marx's ideas. You write: "They can say so, but you would not be able to find anything in Marx which would have justified it. The proletariat was oppressed in the Soviet Union, and no amount of spinning by the Politburo or Pravda could change that." They did say so and they extracted this idea of the revolutionary vanguard from Marx's writings and actions. Marx kicked Bakunin out of the International in order to to achieve ideologically uniformity/cohesion within the Communist Party so that he and his inner cadre could promote the interests of the working class. Marx also learned that lesson from the Paris Commune: without a disciplined party leading them, the proletariat was unable to work effectively towards its own best interests. You write: "However, this is a B
RE: Baha'i Liberation "Theology" ((long quote))
Ian, At 09:06 PM 10/4/2005, you wrote: >>The methodologies do not need to be "uniform" but they must harmonise and >>cannot work at cross-purposes. I suppose one might regard that harmonization >>as a kind of uniformity.<< Uniformity is, IMO, entirely inconsistent with the principle of unity in diversity. How can you justify any kind of uniformity from the Baha'i sources? In terms of harmony, well, it depends on how it is defined. Sometimes harmony is simply a euphemism for a suppression of diversity. For instance, I have occasionally seen Baha'is, often persons rather well-respected in their Baha'i communities, cut off any disagreement on the grounds that it is "disunity." >>I disagree. Marxist-Leninism failed to evolve significantly over 70 years - >>which is why it either collapsed or is being abandoned.<< There is no "it." Communism is simply a name; and the various communisms which developed have little similarity, except in vocabulary, with Marx's views. >>Cuba and North Korea are still Communist to the hilt.<< Those are two of the places I mentioned. However, from everything I have seen, I doubt that they will survive, as dictatorships, for another generation. >>Viet Nam has already made the first moves away from Communism. Both Cuba and >>N. Korea are clear demonstrations that Marxism/Communism simply doesn't work >>as a basis for society-building or economics.<< Again, you are "essentializing," to use Popper's term, a category. There is no such *thing* as communism. >>Having learned from Russia's mistake, China is dismantling Communism one step >>at a time; the Chinese know Marxism and Communism just don't work. North Viet >>Vam is making similar moves.<< Capitalism in China is cementing the divide between the new class of industrialists and the peasants. >>Trotsky stood up to Stalin's dictatorship simply in order to impose his own.<< It was not "his own." Trotsky wanted to see a worker's revolution and dictatorship. >>The point of the quotes from Lynch is that Trotsky has nothing to offer us >>and we Baha'is have no need of anything he has to offer.<< I do not connect Marxism with the Baha'i Faith. When I refer to Marxism, I am not speaking as a Baha'i but as a critical sociologist. >>Do you take that seriously? Has there ever been the slightest sign of any >>communist leader anywhere at any time ever taking that seriously? This is the >>honey to catch the flies.<< Engels was not a politician. He was a revolutionary and an author. He was not responsible for what other people did in his and Marx's names. >>I'm surprised to hear that since you brought up Trotskyism often enough to >>make me and possibly others think you saw some kind of connection.<< I have said many times on this list that I do not. There may be some connections. I have read papers which have attempted to explore them. However, *all* of them struck me as academically weak and poorly constructed. >>If you want to communicate effectively with other people, you're going to >>have to take some note of what words generally mean in the public sphere and >>not just what they mean to you personally. Otherwise we're down to private >>languages (remember Wittgenstein).<< I don't know what else I can do except to repeat that I am not advocating partisan political activity. I have said so many times. However, I am not going to abandon Marxism and post-Marxism because some people want to read into my comments their own viewpoints. >>Yes, Stalin followed in Lenin's footsteps in many important respects. Check >>out the quotes from the article I sent in the last post.<< Lenin *tried* to follow Marx in some areas. Stalin simply threw Marx out the window and retained only the vocabulary. (It was that vocabulary which Stalin shared with Lenin.) In Stalin's Soviet Union, Marx and Engels would likely have ended up in a gulag. >>The Communist party regards itself as the vanguard which represents the true >>interests of the proletariat and, therefore, its rule is the dictatorship of >>the proletariat. If the intelligentsia are working within the Communist Party >>and subservient to its goals, they are in fact, representing the best >>interests of the proletariat.<< They can say so, but you would not be able to find anything in Marx which would have justified it. The proletariat was oppressed in the Soviet Union, and no amount of spinning by the Politburo or Pravda could change that. >>The fact is we have to communicate to a far larger audience than the tiny >>collective of religious scholars and sociologists.<< However, this is a Baha'i Studies list. I do not abandon a vocabulary because non-specialists may find it disagreeable. >>Nonsense. Researchers, thinkers, etc. can legitimise things just by talking >>about them. Take 'recovered memory syndrome' for example, which became >>legitimised to the point of sending people to jail. (Fortunately some other >>academics put an end t
RE: Baha'i Liberation "Theology"
Tim, At 09:35 PM 10/4/2005, you wrote: >>Hey that's a fun game, can I play too?<< Obviously, I would not refer to liberation theology if I didn't admire some of the other liberation theologies. However, liberation theology is not an unembodied universal. Apart from a particular religious context, there is no liberation theology. In that sense, it is more methodological than substantive. >>How about a group of goodhearted scholars who enjoy doing needlework? They >>are the Kindly Knowledgeable Knitters... otherwise known as the KKK. As you >>say, KKK is just a term, it depends on how you define it.<< I don't see how that relates to the issue. I did not pull the term "liberation theology" out of the air. I am using it because I find some other liberation theologies to be appealing. >>As Humpty Dumpty said "a word means just what I choose it to mean." :^) :^)<< IMO, that is true by definition. Via moderna, Mark A. Foster . http://markfoster.net ... [a] word is ... a universal. - William of Ockham Structurization Tech: http://tech.structurization.com The information contained in this e-mail and any attachments thereto ("e-mail") is sent by the Johnson County Community College ("JCCC") and is intended to be confidential and for the use of only the individual or entity named above. The information may be protected by federal and state privacy and disclosures acts or other legal rules. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are notified that retention, dissemination, distribution or copying of this e-mail is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error please immediately notify JCCC by email reply and immediately and permanently delete this e-mail message and any attachments thereto. Thank you. __ You are subscribed to Baha'i Studies as: mailto:archive@mail-archive.com Unsubscribe: send a blank email to mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Subscribe: send subscribe bahai-st in the message body to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subscribe: http://list.jccc.edu:8080/read/all_forums/subscribe?name=bahai-st Baha'i Studies is available through the following: Mail - mailto:bahai-st@list.jccc.edu Web - http://list.jccc.edu:8080/read/?forum=bahai-st News - news://list.jccc.edu/bahai-st Public - http://www.escribe.com/religion/bahaist Old Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.net New Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.edu
RE: Baha'i Liberation "Theology"
Hi Mark, >"Liberation theology" is just a term, and it depends on how you define it.< Hey that's a fun game, can I play too? How about a group of goodhearted scholars who enjoy doing needlework? They are the Kindly Knowledgeable Knitters... otherwise known as the KKK. As you say, KKK is just a term, it depends on how you define it. Here's another one: A group of Canadians who like to put inked stamps on striped wild horses. They are the North American Zebra Inkers(NAZIs) Hey, as you say, Nazi is just a term, it depends on how you define it. As Humpty Dumpty said "a word means just what I choose it to mean." :^) :^) Tim Nolan Yahoo! for Good Click here to donate to the Hurricane Katrina relief effort. The information contained in this e-mail and any attachments thereto ("e-mail") is sent by the Johnson County Community College ("JCCC") and is intended to be confidential and for the use of only the individual or entity named above. The information may be protected by federal and state privacy and disclosures acts or other legal rules. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are notified that retention, dissemination, distribution or copying of this e-mail is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error please immediately notify JCCC by email reply and immediately and permanently delete this e-mail message and any attachments thereto. Thank you. __ You are subscribed to Baha'i Studies as: mailto:archive@mail-archive.com Unsubscribe: send a blank email to mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Subscribe: send subscribe bahai-st in the message body to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subscribe: http://list.jccc.edu:8080/read/all_forums/subscribe?name=bahai-st Baha'i Studies is available through the following: Mail - mailto:bahai-st@list.jccc.edu Web - http://list.jccc.edu:8080/read/?forum=bahai-st News - news://list.jccc.edu/bahai-st Public - http://www.escribe.com/religion/bahaist Old Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.net New Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.edu
RE: Baha'i Liberation "Theology" ((long quote))
Dear Mark, You write: "The "goals" are contained in the Plans from the House of Justice, the national plans formulated by NSAs, etc. I see no reason why the achievement of those goals cannot be accomplished with the framework of the Baha'i principle of unity in diversity. Shared goals do not necessarily demand uniform methodologies." The methodologies do not need to be "uniform" but they must harmonise and cannot work at cross-purposes. I suppose one might regard that harmonization as a kind of uniformity. You write: "The Marxism-Lenism of Shoghi Effendi's day is about gone. Most so-called communist states today - with the exception of Cuba, North Korea, and one or two former Soviet republics (some would include Russia) - are are really authoritarian or right-wing (not totalitarian) dictatorships. They have varying degrees of centralized political control accompanied by private enterprise." I disagree. Marxist-Leninism failed to evolve significantly over 70 years - which is why it either collapsed or is being abandoned. Cuba and North Korea are still Communist to the hilt. Viet Nam has already made the first moves away from Communism. Both Cuba and N. Korea are clear demonstrations that Marxism/Communism simply doesn't work as a basis for society-building or economics. You write: "Communism is merely a name or a category. Are China and North Vietnam communist? Some people think so, but not by my definition." Having learned from Russia's mistake, China is dismantling Communism one step at a time; the Chinese know Marxism and Communism just don't work. North Viet Vam is making similar moves. You write: "I am not talking about his character. I am referring to his willingness to stand up to the Stalinist perversion ("state capitalism") of Marx's ideas. As far as his extreme behavior goes, that is part and parcel of being a revolutionary. A gentle political revolutionary is no revolutionary at all." Trotsky stood up to Stalin's dictatorship simply in order to impose his own. "State capitalism" is exactly what Marx leads to. Only the Left Communists imagined it otherwise - and they never got anywhere precisely because they were fighting what was clearly present in Marx et al. You write: >>Trotsky's enforced militarisation of labour, his crushing of the trade unions, the extreme methods he used to discipline the Red Army, his savagery against the Kronstadt rebels in 1921, and his ferocity towards the Russian peasantry undermine the romantic image of him as `the angel of enlightenment' in an otherwise cruel world.<< "I don't know anyone who likes Trotsky because he was a sweetheart," IAN: The point of the quotes from Lynch is that Trotsky has nothing to offer us and we Baha'is have no need of anything he has to offer. You write: >>(2) "The road to socialism lies through the highest concentration of state power.<< That is the road to socialism, yes. However, in communism, "even the state will wither away and die," as Engels wrote in the last volume of Das Kapital." IAN: Do you take that seriously? Has there ever been the slightest sign of any communist leader anywhere at any time ever taking that seriously? This is the honey to catch the flies. You write "I have never, and would never, compare Trotsky to Baha'is. I see no connection." IAN: I'm surprised to hear that since you brought up Trotskyism often enough to make me and possibly others think you saw some kind of connection. You write: "However, I explicitly said, Ian, that I am not advocating involvement in partisan politics. Marxism, like communism, is not a thing. My construction of Marxism (so-called post-Marxism) is obviously not what you have in your head." IAN: If you want to communicate effectively with other people, you're going to have to take some note of what words generally mean in the public sphere and not just what they mean to you personally. Otherwise we're down to private languages (remember Wittgenstein). You write: >>I get the impression you subscribe to the notion that all of Communism's evils can be placed at Stalin's door. Stalin simply followed in Lenin's footsteps; both based themselves on Marx's severely flawed social and historical analysis.<< "Followed in Lenin's footsteps???" IAN: Yes, Stalin followed in Lenin's footsteps in many important respects. Check out the quotes from the article I sent in the last post. You write: >>Not really. Stalin simply put into practice Marx's dictatorship of the proletariat and his dictum that violence [force] is the midwife of history. (Das Kapital)<< Impossible. Marx's dictatorship of the proletariat (socialism) was a, um, dictatorship of the *proletariat*. Russia was never a capitalist state (really more feudal) and, therefore, could not have a dictatorship of the proletariat. The Soviet Union, during and after Stalin, was a dictatorship of the intelligentsia." IAN: The Communist party regards itself as the vanguard which represents the true
RE: Baha'i Liberation "Theology" ((long quote))
Ian, At 11:28 AM 10/4/2005, you wrote: >>Working effectively for a cause requires (a) working for the same ultimate >>goals, (b) working for proximate goals that, at the very least, do not >>contradict each other, (c) co-ordinating efforts i.e. adopting methodologies >>that harmonise and do not work at cross-purposes and (d) setting aside a lot >>of personal preferences. All this used to be called "party discipline" in the >>Communist parties.<< The "goals" are contained in the Plans from the House of Justice, the national plans formulated by NSAs, etc. I see no reason why the achievement of those goals cannot be accomplished with the framework of the Baha'i principle of unity in diversity. Shared goals do not necessarily demand uniform methodologies. >>That's a pretty good list though I think Shoghi Effendi talks about >>"unbridled capitalism" rather than "corporate capitalism." I would also add >>Communism. The Guardian calls it one of the "three false gods" (The Promised >>Day is Come 113) and says,<< The Marxism-Lenism of Shoghi Effendi's day is about gone. Most so-called communist states today - with the exception of Cuba, North Korea, and one or two former Soviet republics (some would include Russia) - are are really authoritarian or right-wing (not totalitarian) dictatorships. They have varying degrees of centralized political control accompanied by private enterprise. Communism is merely a name or a category. Are China and North Vietnam communist? Some people think so, but not by my definition. >>Why not? Trotsky was a thoroughly unpleasant piece of baggage both as a man >>and in his ideas. I'm not sure why you admire him so much. The following is >>by Michael Lynch in the History Review, 1999)<< I am not talking about his character. I am referring to his willingness to stand up to the Stalinist perversion ("state capitalism") of Marx's ideas. As far as his extreme behavior goes, that is part and parcel of being a revolutionary. A gentle political revolutionary is no revolutionary at all. >>"Stalinism, therefore, was not a reversal of Leninism but a continuation of >>it."<< Continuation? Sure. But it was a *progression* of Marxist-Leninism. >>Trotsky's enforced militarisation of labour, his crushing of the trade >>unions, the extreme methods he used to discipline the Red Army, his savagery >>against the Kronstadt rebels in 1921, and his ferocity towards the Russian >>peasantry undermine the romantic image of him as `the angel of enlightenment' >>in an otherwise cruel world.<< I don't know anyone who likes Trotsky because he was a sweetheart, >>(2) "The road to socialism lies through the highest concentration of state >>power.<< That is the road to socialism, yes. However, in communism, "even the state will wither away and die," as Engels wrote in the last volume of Das Kapital. >>Nothing about Trotsky or his career suggests that he is a suitable role model >>or intellectual partner for Baha'is.<< I have never, and would never, compare Trotsky to Baha'is. I see no connection. >>I disagree on both counts. Stalin was the logical outcome of Marx and Lenin. >>I don't subscribe to the view of Stalin's exceptionalism, i.e. the view that >>Stalin was somehow an anomaly in the development of Communism/Marxism.<< Exceptionalism presumes linguistic realism, i.e., that the word "communist" is real. However, "communism" is a name for a variety of views - some more consistent with Marx's views than others. There is no such *thing* as a communist. It is a category or social construction. >>If we engage in partisan politics we will find ourselves as de facto allies >>with all sorts of unsavoury rabble. We have to bear in mind the old folk >>saying, "When you sup with the devil make sure you bring a long spoon."<< However, I explicitly said, Ian, that I am not advocating involvement in partisan politics. Marxism, like communism, is not a thing. My construction of Marxism (so-called post-Marxism) is obviously not what you have in your head. >>I get the impression you subscribe to the notion that all of Communism's >>evils can be placed at Stalin's door. Stalin simply followed in Lenin's >>footsteps; both based themselves on Marx's severely flawed social and >>historical analysis.<< Followed in Lenin's footsteps??? >>Not really. Stalin simply put into practice Marx's dictatorship of the >>proletariat and his dictum that violence [force] is the midwife of history. >>(Das Kapital)<< Impossible. Marx's dictatorship of the proletariat (socialism) was a, um, dictatorship of the *proletariat*. Russia was never a capitalist state (really more feudal) and, therefore, could not have a dictatorship of the proletariat. The Soviet Union, during and after Stalin, was a dictatorship of the intelligentsia. >>Yes, I have always understood that - but nonetheless I would point out that >>this usage is confusing and easily leads to misunderstanding.<< It is not c
RE: Baha'i Liberation "Theology" ((long quote))
Dear Mark, You ask: "Does unity of thought and action require that everyone has the same views and uses the same approaches? That is not my understanding of the concept." Working effectively for a cause requires (a) working for the same ultimate goals, (b) working for proximate goals that, at the very least, do not contradict each other, (c) co-ordinating efforts i.e. adopting methodologies that harmonise and do not work at cross-purposes and (d) setting aside a lot of personal preferences. All this used to be called "party discipline" in the Communist parties. You write: "Liberation theology" is just a term, and it depends on how you define it. However, if you are saying that liberation from injustice, oppression, racism, sexism, militant nationalism, corporate capitalism, etc. are important themes in the Baha'i primary sources, including the letters by (and on behalf of) the Universal House of Justice, I would agree with you." That's a pretty good list though I think Shoghi Effendi talks about "unbridled capitalism" rather than "corporate capitalism." I would also add Communism. The Guardian calls it one of the "three false gods" (The Promised Day is Come 113) and says, "The chief idols in the desecrated temple of mankind are none other than the triple gods of Nationalism, Racialism and *Communism*, at whose altars governments and peoples, whether democratic or totalitarian, at peace or at war, of the East or of the West, Christian or Islamic, are, in various forms and in different degrees, now worshiping." (The Promised Day is Come 113) You write: "As I said earlier in this thread, I am not advocating any form of partisan political activity. On the other hand, I would not want to place communists (at least Trotskyites) in the same category as fascists and extreme nationalists." IAN: Why not? Trotsky was a thoroughly unpleasant piece of baggage both as a man and in his ideas. I'm not sure why you admire him so much. The following is by Michael Lynch in the History Review, 1999) " Was Trotskyism a humane alternative to Stalinism? There are still those who regard Trotsky as the Communist with the human touch, the man who would have led the Russian Revolution towards democratic socialism. But this interpretation is hard to sustain in the face of the record of his fanatical behaviour as a Soviet commissar between 1917 and 1921. In the 1990s, Dmitri Volkogonov, the Russian biographer of Lenin, Stalin and Trotsky, produced evidence from previously unexamined Russian state papers to show that Lenin and Trotsky had worked together on a deliberate policy of terror that precisely foreshadowed the later Stalinist tyranny. Stalinism, therefore, was not a reversal of Leninism but a continuation of it. Trotsky's enforced militarisation of labour, his crushing of the trade unions, the extreme methods he used to discipline the Red Army, his savagery against the Kronstadt rebels in 1921, and his ferocity towards the Russian peasantry undermine the romantic image of him as `the angel of enlightenment' in an otherwise cruel world. In exile, Trotsky denounced Stalinism not because it was brutal but because it was brutal for the wrong reasons. All the signs were that, had Trotsky had the opportunity to enforce his concept of revolution on the Bolshevik state, he would have used very similar means to those that Stalin employed. Absolute authority was the necessary requirement of Bolshevik rule. Long before Stalin imposed himself on the Party, Trotsky had supported Lenin in the creation of the one-party totalitarian state, with its secret police, show trials, and prison camps. Trotsky believed unashamedly in state terror." Micheal Lynch, "Trotsky: Angel of Enlightenment or Frustrated Dictator?" (Michael Lynch, "History Review" 1999) Some Trotksy quotes: (1) "Murder, lies and treachery are immoral and shameful if they are harmful to the cause of the proletarian revolution; these same lies, treachery and murder are moral and laudable if they serve this revolution.' (2) "The road to socialism lies through the highest concentration of state power. Like a light bulb which, before extinguishing itself, flashes brightly, so the state prior to its disappearance takes the form of the dictatorship of the proletariat, i.e. of the most pitiless state, which coercively controls the life of the citizens in all its aspects.'" Nothing about Trotsky or his career suggests that he is a suitable role model or intellectual partner for Baha'is. You write: "I also believe that corporate capitalism and other forms of (what I would consider to be) state-sponsored terrorism are much more problematic than Stalinism (however much I may disagree with Stalin's bastardization of Marx's views)." I disagree on both counts. Stalin was the logical outcome of Marx and Lenin. I don't subscribe to the view of Stalin's exceptionalism, i.e. the view that Stalin was somehow an anomaly in the development of Communism/Marxism.
RE: Baha'i Liberation "Theology" ((long quote))
Susan, At 11:08 PM 10/3/2005, you wrote: >>It was the UFW that finally succeeded in organizing most of the grape >>pickers.<< They did ultimately, yes. >>They got started in the 60's but it was largely thanks to the boycott that >>they were finally successful, especially with Gallo.<< That was what my friend Stephanie Erickson believed, too. ;-) She and I were the two most active members of our chapter of the STC (in 7th grade). I never thought so. I always attributed it to media publicity. In 1968-1969 (?), Stephanie and I organized several demonstrations in front of a local supermarket which sold the grapes. (About a year later, someone burned the place down. They eventually found the perpetrator. Fortunately, he had nothing to do with us, but he was my next-door neighbor's son!) >>I went without eating grapes for nearly a decade during that period.<< I probably lasted about half that time, and I also persuaded my parents to do it for a while. However, they did purchase California wine, which I thought kind of defeated the purpose. >>When the UFW tried to organize workers in other agricultural sector the >>Teamsters moved in and signed sweetheart contracts with the management. I >>worked for a frozen food packing company and ended up quitting rather than >>join the Teamsters. In my mind, that was like joining the Mafia!<< They did seem to have had those connections. Via moderna, Mark A. Foster . http://markfoster.net ... [a] word is ... a universal. - William of Ockham Structurization Tech: http://tech.structurization.com The information contained in this e-mail and any attachments thereto ("e-mail") is sent by the Johnson County Community College ("JCCC") and is intended to be confidential and for the use of only the individual or entity named above. The information may be protected by federal and state privacy and disclosures acts or other legal rules. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are notified that retention, dissemination, distribution or copying of this e-mail is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error please immediately notify JCCC by email reply and immediately and permanently delete this e-mail message and any attachments thereto. Thank you. __ You are subscribed to Baha'i Studies as: mailto:archive@mail-archive.com Unsubscribe: send a blank email to mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Subscribe: send subscribe bahai-st in the message body to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subscribe: http://list.jccc.edu:8080/read/all_forums/subscribe?name=bahai-st Baha'i Studies is available through the following: Mail - mailto:bahai-st@list.jccc.edu Web - http://list.jccc.edu:8080/read/?forum=bahai-st News - news://list.jccc.edu/bahai-st Public - http://www.escribe.com/religion/bahaist Old Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.net New Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.edu
RE: Baha'i Liberation "Theology" ((long quote))
>>I didn't know you were referring to the UFW. That union was started in the early to mid 60s - before the petitions even got started. I thought you meant the Teamsters. Of course, the UFW and the Teamsters never really got along.<< Dear Mark, It was the UFW that finally succeeded in organizing most of the grape pickers. They got started in the 60's but it was largely thanks to the boycott that they were finally successful, especially with Gallo. I went without eating grapes for nearly a decade during that period. When the UFW tried to organize workers in other agricultural sector the Teamsters moved in and signed sweetheart contracts with the management. I worked for a frozen food packing company and ended up quitting rather than join the Teamsters. In my mind, that was like joining the Mafia! warmest, Susan The information contained in this e-mail and any attachments thereto ("e-mail") is sent by the Johnson County Community College ("JCCC") and is intended to be confidential and for the use of only the individual or entity named above. The information may be protected by federal and state privacy and disclosures acts or other legal rules. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are notified that retention, dissemination, distribution or copying of this e-mail is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error please immediately notify JCCC by email reply and immediately and permanently delete this e-mail message and any attachments thereto. Thank you. __ You are subscribed to Baha'i Studies as: mailto:archive@mail-archive.com Unsubscribe: send a blank email to mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Subscribe: send subscribe bahai-st in the message body to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subscribe: http://list.jccc.edu:8080/read/all_forums/subscribe?name=bahai-st Baha'i Studies is available through the following: Mail - mailto:bahai-st@list.jccc.edu Web - http://list.jccc.edu:8080/read/?forum=bahai-st News - news://list.jccc.edu/bahai-st Public - http://www.escribe.com/religion/bahaist Old Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.net New Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.edu
RE: Baha'i Liberation "Theology" ((long quote))
Hi, Susan, At 10:17 PM 10/3/2005, you wrote: >>The United Farmworkers was a pretty home-grown movement. It took years forthe >>AFL-CIO to even recognize them. And the Teamsters only signed sweetheart >>contracts.<< >>I didn't know you were referring to the UFW. That union was started in the >>early to mid 60s - before the petitions even got started. I thought you meant >>the Teamsters. Of course, the UFW and the Teamsters never really got along.<< Via moderna, Mark A. Foster . http://markfoster.net ... [a] word is ... a universal. - William of Ockham Structurization Tech: http://tech.structurization.com The information contained in this e-mail and any attachments thereto ("e-mail") is sent by the Johnson County Community College ("JCCC") and is intended to be confidential and for the use of only the individual or entity named above. The information may be protected by federal and state privacy and disclosures acts or other legal rules. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are notified that retention, dissemination, distribution or copying of this e-mail is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error please immediately notify JCCC by email reply and immediately and permanently delete this e-mail message and any attachments thereto. Thank you. __ You are subscribed to Baha'i Studies as: mailto:archive@mail-archive.com Unsubscribe: send a blank email to mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Subscribe: send subscribe bahai-st in the message body to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subscribe: http://list.jccc.edu:8080/read/all_forums/subscribe?name=bahai-st Baha'i Studies is available through the following: Mail - mailto:bahai-st@list.jccc.edu Web - http://list.jccc.edu:8080/read/?forum=bahai-st News - news://list.jccc.edu/bahai-st Public - http://www.escribe.com/religion/bahaist Old Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.net New Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.edu
RE: Baha'i Liberation "Theology" ((long quote))
"I agree, but do you think it was a result of the boycotts? As I see it, it was the media focus which led to unions becoming interested in the population." Dear Mark, The United Farmworkers was a pretty home-grown movement. It took years for the AFL-CIO to even recognize them. And the Teamsters only signed sweetheart contracts. warmest, Susan The information contained in this e-mail and any attachments thereto ("e-mail") is sent by the Johnson County Community College ("JCCC") and is intended to be confidential and for the use of only the individual or entity named above. The information may be protected by federal and state privacy and disclosures acts or other legal rules. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are notified that retention, dissemination, distribution or copying of this e-mail is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error please immediately notify JCCC by email reply and immediately and permanently delete this e-mail message and any attachments thereto. Thank you. __ You are subscribed to Baha'i Studies as: mailto:archive@mail-archive.com Unsubscribe: send a blank email to mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Subscribe: send subscribe bahai-st in the message body to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subscribe: http://list.jccc.edu:8080/read/all_forums/subscribe?name=bahai-st Baha'i Studies is available through the following: Mail - mailto:bahai-st@list.jccc.edu Web - http://list.jccc.edu:8080/read/?forum=bahai-st News - news://list.jccc.edu/bahai-st Public - http://www.escribe.com/religion/bahaist Old Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.net New Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.edu
RE: Baha'i Liberation "Theology" ((long quote))
Susan, At 09:57 PM 10/3/2005, you wrote: >>Yeah, but Gallo was forced to unionize. That was no small victory.<< I agree, but do you think it was a result of the boycotts? As I see it, it was the media focus which led to unions becoming interested in the population. Via moderna, Mark A. Foster . http://markfoster.net ... [a] word is ... a universal. - William of Ockham Structurization Tech: http://tech.structurization.com The information contained in this e-mail and any attachments thereto ("e-mail") is sent by the Johnson County Community College ("JCCC") and is intended to be confidential and for the use of only the individual or entity named above. The information may be protected by federal and state privacy and disclosures acts or other legal rules. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are notified that retention, dissemination, distribution or copying of this e-mail is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error please immediately notify JCCC by email reply and immediately and permanently delete this e-mail message and any attachments thereto. Thank you. __ You are subscribed to Baha'i Studies as: mailto:archive@mail-archive.com Unsubscribe: send a blank email to mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Subscribe: send subscribe bahai-st in the message body to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subscribe: http://list.jccc.edu:8080/read/all_forums/subscribe?name=bahai-st Baha'i Studies is available through the following: Mail - mailto:bahai-st@list.jccc.edu Web - http://list.jccc.edu:8080/read/?forum=bahai-st News - news://list.jccc.edu/bahai-st Public - http://www.escribe.com/religion/bahaist Old Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.net New Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.edu
RE: Baha'i Liberation "Theology" ((long quote))
Susan, At 09:57 PM 10/3/2005, you wrote: >>They were pretty effective against South Africa.<< That is what some governments claimed. Personally, I did not buy it. South Africa abandoned Apartheid because of popular dissent; and the support for it among whites had declined, as well. It was, in part, this lack of support among the Afrikaaners which contributed to the rise of Neo-Nazi groups in the country. Via moderna, Mark A. Foster . http://markfoster.net ... [a] word is ... a universal. - William of Ockham Structurization Tech: http://tech.structurization.com The information contained in this e-mail and any attachments thereto ("e-mail") is sent by the Johnson County Community College ("JCCC") and is intended to be confidential and for the use of only the individual or entity named above. The information may be protected by federal and state privacy and disclosures acts or other legal rules. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are notified that retention, dissemination, distribution or copying of this e-mail is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error please immediately notify JCCC by email reply and immediately and permanently delete this e-mail message and any attachments thereto. Thank you. __ You are subscribed to Baha'i Studies as: mailto:archive@mail-archive.com Unsubscribe: send a blank email to mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Subscribe: send subscribe bahai-st in the message body to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subscribe: http://list.jccc.edu:8080/read/all_forums/subscribe?name=bahai-st Baha'i Studies is available through the following: Mail - mailto:bahai-st@list.jccc.edu Web - http://list.jccc.edu:8080/read/?forum=bahai-st News - news://list.jccc.edu/bahai-st Public - http://www.escribe.com/religion/bahaist Old Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.net New Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.edu
RE: Baha'i Liberation "Theology" ((long quote))
"Sure, but boycotts are rarely effective." Dear Mark, They were pretty effective against South Africa. "Back in the late 60s, when I was a member my school's chapter of the Students' Democratic Coalition (affiliated with the SDS), I handed out petitions to boycott California grapes. A lot of us participated, and, all over the country, we got tens of thousands of returned petitions. Well, the economic abuse of migrant workers is still going on." Yeah, but Gallo was forced to unionize. That was no small victory. warmest, Susan The information contained in this e-mail and any attachments thereto ("e-mail") is sent by the Johnson County Community College ("JCCC") and is intended to be confidential and for the use of only the individual or entity named above. The information may be protected by federal and state privacy and disclosures acts or other legal rules. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are notified that retention, dissemination, distribution or copying of this e-mail is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error please immediately notify JCCC by email reply and immediately and permanently delete this e-mail message and any attachments thereto. Thank you. __ You are subscribed to Baha'i Studies as: mailto:archive@mail-archive.com Unsubscribe: send a blank email to mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Subscribe: send subscribe bahai-st in the message body to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subscribe: http://list.jccc.edu:8080/read/all_forums/subscribe?name=bahai-st Baha'i Studies is available through the following: Mail - mailto:bahai-st@list.jccc.edu Web - http://list.jccc.edu:8080/read/?forum=bahai-st News - news://list.jccc.edu/bahai-st Public - http://www.escribe.com/religion/bahaist Old Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.net New Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.edu
RE: Baha'i Liberation "Theology" ((long quote))
Susan, At 09:06 PM 10/3/2005, you wrote: >>Well, as I said Baha'is are free to join in boycotts of the worst >>multi-national offenders. And one doesn't even have to get involved in >>politics to do that.<< Sure, but boycotts are rarely effective. Most people seem to have a short attention span. Back in the late 60s, when I was a member my school's chapter of the Students' Democratic Coalition (affiliated with the SDS), I handed out petitions to boycott California grapes. A lot of us participated, and, all over the country, we got tens of thousands of returned petitions. Well, the economic abuse of migrant workers is still going on. Unfortunately, comparing social problems to clothing, we have what one writer called "a designer social consciousness." The problems didn't go away, but we did. Via moderna, Mark A. Foster . http://markfoster.net ... [a] word is ... a universal. - William of Ockham Structurization Tech: http://tech.structurization.com The information contained in this e-mail and any attachments thereto ("e-mail") is sent by the Johnson County Community College ("JCCC") and is intended to be confidential and for the use of only the individual or entity named above. The information may be protected by federal and state privacy and disclosures acts or other legal rules. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are notified that retention, dissemination, distribution or copying of this e-mail is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error please immediately notify JCCC by email reply and immediately and permanently delete this e-mail message and any attachments thereto. Thank you. __ You are subscribed to Baha'i Studies as: mailto:archive@mail-archive.com Unsubscribe: send a blank email to mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Subscribe: send subscribe bahai-st in the message body to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subscribe: http://list.jccc.edu:8080/read/all_forums/subscribe?name=bahai-st Baha'i Studies is available through the following: Mail - mailto:bahai-st@list.jccc.edu Web - http://list.jccc.edu:8080/read/?forum=bahai-st News - news://list.jccc.edu/bahai-st Public - http://www.escribe.com/religion/bahaist Old Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.net New Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.edu
RE: Baha'i Liberation "Theology" ((long quote))
"Importers, such as the U.S., have little incentive to protest; and any outrage is drowned out by the demand for cheaper goods" Dear Mark, Well, as I said Baha'is are free to join in boycotts of the worst multi-national offenders. And one doesn't even have to get involved in politics to do that. warmest, Susan The information contained in this e-mail and any attachments thereto ("e-mail") is sent by the Johnson County Community College ("JCCC") and is intended to be confidential and for the use of only the individual or entity named above. The information may be protected by federal and state privacy and disclosures acts or other legal rules. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are notified that retention, dissemination, distribution or copying of this e-mail is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error please immediately notify JCCC by email reply and immediately and permanently delete this e-mail message and any attachments thereto. Thank you. __ You are subscribed to Baha'i Studies as: mailto:archive@mail-archive.com Unsubscribe: send a blank email to mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Subscribe: send subscribe bahai-st in the message body to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subscribe: http://list.jccc.edu:8080/read/all_forums/subscribe?name=bahai-st Baha'i Studies is available through the following: Mail - mailto:bahai-st@list.jccc.edu Web - http://list.jccc.edu:8080/read/?forum=bahai-st News - news://list.jccc.edu/bahai-st Public - http://www.escribe.com/religion/bahaist Old Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.net New Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.edu
RE: Baha'i Liberation "Theology" ((long quote))
Susan, At 07:34 PM 10/3/2005, you wrote: >>It can be if there is sufficient enforcement. And one of the ways to enforce >>it is to outlaw the import of any goods produced by child labor. If you do >>that, then adults will have to be hired which raises the wages and when adult >>wages are raised, children don't have to work.<< If there are any new "false gods," they would probably include the WTO and globalization. Importers, such as the U.S., have little incentive to protest; and any outrage is drowned out by the demand for cheaper goods, Via moderna, Mark A. Foster . http://markfoster.net ... [a] word is ... a universal. - William of Ockham Structurization Tech: http://tech.structurization.com The information contained in this e-mail and any attachments thereto ("e-mail") is sent by the Johnson County Community College ("JCCC") and is intended to be confidential and for the use of only the individual or entity named above. The information may be protected by federal and state privacy and disclosures acts or other legal rules. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are notified that retention, dissemination, distribution or copying of this e-mail is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error please immediately notify JCCC by email reply and immediately and permanently delete this e-mail message and any attachments thereto. Thank you. __ You are subscribed to Baha'i Studies as: mailto:archive@mail-archive.com Unsubscribe: send a blank email to mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Subscribe: send subscribe bahai-st in the message body to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subscribe: http://list.jccc.edu:8080/read/all_forums/subscribe?name=bahai-st Baha'i Studies is available through the following: Mail - mailto:bahai-st@list.jccc.edu Web - http://list.jccc.edu:8080/read/?forum=bahai-st News - news://list.jccc.edu/bahai-st Public - http://www.escribe.com/religion/bahaist Old Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.net New Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.edu
RE: Baha'i Liberation "Theology" ((long quote))
"The issue is *how* to eliminate child labor. It obviously cannot be eradicated merely by outlawing it." Dear Mark, It can be if there is sufficient enforcement. And one of the ways to enforce it is to outlaw the import of any goods produced by child labor. If you do that, then adults will have to be hired which raises the wages and when adult wages are raised, children don't have to work. warmest, Susan The information contained in this e-mail and any attachments thereto ("e-mail") is sent by the Johnson County Community College ("JCCC") and is intended to be confidential and for the use of only the individual or entity named above. The information may be protected by federal and state privacy and disclosures acts or other legal rules. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are notified that retention, dissemination, distribution or copying of this e-mail is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error please immediately notify JCCC by email reply and immediately and permanently delete this e-mail message and any attachments thereto. Thank you. __ You are subscribed to Baha'i Studies as: mailto:archive@mail-archive.com Unsubscribe: send a blank email to mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Subscribe: send subscribe bahai-st in the message body to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subscribe: http://list.jccc.edu:8080/read/all_forums/subscribe?name=bahai-st Baha'i Studies is available through the following: Mail - mailto:bahai-st@list.jccc.edu Web - http://list.jccc.edu:8080/read/?forum=bahai-st News - news://list.jccc.edu/bahai-st Public - http://www.escribe.com/religion/bahaist Old Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.net New Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.edu
RE: Baha'i Liberation "Theology" ((long quote))
Susan, At 06:56 PM 10/3/2005, you wrote: >>Those classes which find it necessary to have their children work are rarely >>those who have access to a college education in any case.<< They are the underclass, and child labor is one of the oppressive residues of the classism (the ideology) in those societies. As full-time child laborers they have almost no hope at all of escaping their predicament. The issue is *how* to eliminate child labor. It obviously cannot be eradicated merely by outlawing it. The caste-based modes of social stratification which characterize both China and India need to be adjusted and corrected. Via moderna, Mark A. Foster . http://markfoster.net ... [a] word is ... a universal. - William of Ockham Structurization Tech: http://tech.structurization.com The information contained in this e-mail and any attachments thereto ("e-mail") is sent by the Johnson County Community College ("JCCC") and is intended to be confidential and for the use of only the individual or entity named above. The information may be protected by federal and state privacy and disclosures acts or other legal rules. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are notified that retention, dissemination, distribution or copying of this e-mail is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error please immediately notify JCCC by email reply and immediately and permanently delete this e-mail message and any attachments thereto. Thank you. __ You are subscribed to Baha'i Studies as: mailto:archive@mail-archive.com Unsubscribe: send a blank email to mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Subscribe: send subscribe bahai-st in the message body to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subscribe: http://list.jccc.edu:8080/read/all_forums/subscribe?name=bahai-st Baha'i Studies is available through the following: Mail - mailto:bahai-st@list.jccc.edu Web - http://list.jccc.edu:8080/read/?forum=bahai-st News - news://list.jccc.edu/bahai-st Public - http://www.escribe.com/religion/bahaist Old Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.net New Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.edu
RE: Baha'i Liberation "Theology" ((long quote))
"True, but some of those societies are places like China and India. Receiving a baccalaureate is, in some ways, even more important in these two countries than in the U.S. or Western Europe; and child labor, by keeping people mired in the underclass, makes that unlikely." Dear Mark, Those classes which find it necessary to have their children work are rarely those who have access to a college education in any case. warmest, Susan The information contained in this e-mail and any attachments thereto ("e-mail") is sent by the Johnson County Community College ("JCCC") and is intended to be confidential and for the use of only the individual or entity named above. The information may be protected by federal and state privacy and disclosures acts or other legal rules. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are notified that retention, dissemination, distribution or copying of this e-mail is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error please immediately notify JCCC by email reply and immediately and permanently delete this e-mail message and any attachments thereto. Thank you. __ You are subscribed to Baha'i Studies as: mailto:archive@mail-archive.com Unsubscribe: send a blank email to mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Subscribe: send subscribe bahai-st in the message body to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subscribe: http://list.jccc.edu:8080/read/all_forums/subscribe?name=bahai-st Baha'i Studies is available through the following: Mail - mailto:bahai-st@list.jccc.edu Web - http://list.jccc.edu:8080/read/?forum=bahai-st News - news://list.jccc.edu/bahai-st Public - http://www.escribe.com/religion/bahaist Old Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.net New Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.edu
RE: Baha'i Liberation "Theology" ((long quote))
Ian, At 05:33 PM 10/3/2005, you wrote: >>If a so-called 'Baha'i liberation theology' cannot provide or exemplify unity >>of thought and action, it will soon become part of the problem that >>Baha'u'llah came to solve rather than a solution.<< Does unity of thought and action require that everyone has the same views and uses the same approaches? That is not my understanding of the concept. >>Perhaps it is better to realise that the Baha'i Faith *is* a liberation >>theology as it stands. To be sure, this aspect needs further explication, but >>the foundations are already in the Writings and the guidance of the Universal >>House of Justice.<< "Liberation theology" is just a term, and it depends on how you define it. However, if you are saying that liberation from injustice, oppression, racism, sexism, militant nationalism, corporate capitalism, etc. are important themes in the Baha'i primary sources, including the letters by (and on behalf of) the Universal House of Justice, I would agree with you. >>There are certainly 'sides' in some of the activities in which a Baha'i >>liberation theology could be involved. Like it or not, Baha'i activists >>would find themselves 'marching' side-by-side with - and providing tacit >>support and/or legitimacy to - anarchists both violent and non-violent, >>various kinds of communists, extreme nationalists and fascists and worse - >>as has happened at anti-globalization marches and other kinds of >>demonstrations for various causes.<< As I said earlier in this thread, I am not advocating any form of partisan political activity. On the other hand, I would not want to place communists (at least Trotskyites) in the same category as fascists and extreme nationalists. I also believe that corporate capitalism and other forms of (what I would consider to be) state-sponsored terrorism are much more problematic than Stalinism (however much I may disagree with Stalin's bastardization of Marx's views). >>We may not want to be identified with such people but if we walk with them we >>will be.<< I am not sure where you got the idea that I am suggesting what you wrote. >>Whether you or anyone else thinks Marxism hasn't been discredited doesn' >>really matter. The facts are clear: with the exception of Cuba (whose >>national anthem is "Row, row, row your boat [to Miami]"), all countries that >>tried Marxism as the basis of society and economics either have abandoned it >>or are in the process of doing so.<< I was no great supporter of the Stalinist and post-Stalinist USSR or of post-Maoist China (even prior to its consolidation into the WTO). However, I frankly see corporate capitalism and its state sponsors to be much more dangerous. At least some of them, both state and corporate actors, have, in the last 4 years, become involved in two destructive wars in Asia, and I feel I have good reason to be concerned over the future. >>Their experience and their actions speak louder than any theoretical flights >>of fancy by those who have never experienced Marxism in real life.<< Well, Stalinism is Stalinism, not Marxism. >>As for the notion that there are many Baha'i faiths, we have already >>discussed this once before and I can only repeat my position: there is only >>one Baha'i Faith and many understandings/versions of it.<< IMO, you are responding to the terminology as *you*, not as I, would use it. When I say there are many Baha'i faiths (small "f"), it is precisely the "many understandings/versions of it" that I have in mind. >>IOW, the Writings embody the perfect model of the Baha'i Faith and >>(ultimately) the Universal House of Justice ensures that all local and >>personal versions harmonise with that perfect model. Calling these local and >>individual versions Baha'i faiths (with a small 'f') simply confuses the >>issue.<< I may be confusing in the contexts of some "Baha'i faiths," but not in my own. ;-) Via moderna, Mark A. Foster . http://markfoster.net ... [a] word is ... a universal. - William of Ockham Structurization Tech: http://tech.structurization.com The information contained in this e-mail and any attachments thereto ("e-mail") is sent by the Johnson County Community College ("JCCC") and is intended to be confidential and for the use of only the individual or entity named above. The information may be protected by federal and state privacy and disclosures acts or other legal rules. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are notified that retention, dissemination, distribution or copying of this e-mail is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error please immediately notify JCCC by email reply and immediately and permanently delete this e-mail message and any attachments thereto. Thank you. __ You are subscribed to Baha'i Studies as: mailto:archive@mail-archive.com Unsubscribe: send a blank email t
RE: Baha'i Liberation "Theology" ((long quote))
Dear Mark, If a so-called 'Baha'i liberation theology' cannot provide or exemplify unity of thought and action, it will soon become part of the problem that Baha'u'llah came to solve rather than a solution. Perhaps it is better to realise that the Baha'i Faith *is* a liberation theology as it stands. To be sure, this aspect needs further explication, but the foundations are already in the Writings and the guidance of the Universal House of Justice. There are certainly 'sides' in some of the activities in which a Baha'i liberation theology could be involved. Like it or not, Baha'i activists would find themselves 'marching' side-by-side with - and providing tacit support and/or legitimacy to - anarchists both violent and non-violent, various kinds of communists, extreme nationalists and fascists and worse - as has happened at anti-globalization marches and other kinds of demonstrations for various causes. We may not want to be identified with such people but if we walk with them we will be. Whether you or anyone else thinks Marxism hasn't been discredited doesn't really matter. The facts are clear: with the exception of Cuba (whose national anthem is "Row, row, row your boat [to Miami]"), all countries that tried Marxism as the basis of society and economics either have abandoned it or are in the process of doing so. Their experience and their actions speak louder than any theoretical flights of fancy by those who have never experienced Marxism in real life. As for the notion that there are many Baha'i faiths, we have already discussed this once before and I can only repeat my position: there is only one Baha'i Faith and many understandings/versions of it. IOW, the Writings embody the perfect model of the Baha'i Faith and (ultimately) the Universal House of Justice ensures that all local and personal versions harmonise with that perfect model. Calling these local and individual versions Baha'i faiths (with a small 'f') simply confuses the issue. Best wishes, Ian Kluge -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mark A. Foster Sent: October 3, 2005 1:34 PM To: Baha'i Studies Subject: RE: Baha'i Liberation "Theology" ((long quote)) Ian, At 11:18 AM 10/3/2005, you wrote: >>In the exchanges already seen, we observe the main problem in establishing a Baha'i liberation theology: disunity.<< I am not sure if that can be a measure of a useful construction. People, including Baha'is, disagree on all sorts of things. Personally, I like coming up with different constructions, thought experiments, and language games - then seeing where they lead. I do that both in sociology and in the Baha'i Faith. I think that this practice can be productive - as long as one does not become overly attached to one's ideas and is open to whatever evidence may present itself. >>There is simply no agreement on what constitutes a problem - and more importantly, by what means to seek a solution. Moreover, we also have the problems caused by those who are - supposedly - on 'our side' but whose presence or 'support' weakens whatever cause we work for.<< I don't see it as a "side." I see it as the construction of a "Baha'i faith" (lower-case "f"), i.e., as religious ecology. I explain this idea in one of my papers: "Numerous approaches to scriptural hermeneutics have been developed. The revealed Word, the transmission of the knowledge of God, might be compared with a driver; historicism, the Prophetic ecology of the dialectical God-Man and His Revelation situated in their original cultural, historical, bodily, and linguistic contexts, to the vehicle; and religous ecology (or cultural syncretism), the recontextualizations of the revealed Word into multiple normative structurizations, to the destination. "A distinction can, therefore, be drawn between religion as divine Revelation and religion as social construction. The first, Prophetic ecology, is the proclamation of the Word of God, the Logos, or the Teachings of an embodied Messenger to a peculiarized cultural, historical, and physical audience. The second, designated as religious ecology, is a fundamentally human phenomenon. "From the standpoint of religious ecology, revealed religions do not operate in a vacuum. Rather, given the dynamic interplay between an original Revelation and the individuals and groups which receive it, one may speak of multiple Judaisms, Buddhisms, Christianities, Islams, Bahá'í faiths, etc. "Ergo, the Bahá'í faith in Iran is not precisely the Bahá'í faith in the United States. In the latter, the Bahá'í Faith has been commingled, among diverse persons and groups, with elements of Protestantism, the New Age
RE: Baha'i Liberation "Theology" ((long quote))
Ian, At 11:18 AM 10/3/2005, you wrote: >>In the exchanges already seen, we observe the main problem in establishing a >>Baha'i liberation theology: disunity.<< I am not sure if that can be a measure of a useful construction. People, including Baha'is, disagree on all sorts of things. Personally, I like coming up with different constructions, thought experiments, and language games - then seeing where they lead. I do that both in sociology and in the Baha'i Faith. I think that this practice can be productive - as long as one does not become overly attached to one's ideas and is open to whatever evidence may present itself. >>There is simply no agreement on what constitutes a problem - and more >>importantly, by what means to seek a solution. Moreover, we also have the >>problems caused by those who are - supposedly - on 'our side' but whose >>presence or 'support' weakens whatever cause we work for.<< I don't see it as a "side." I see it as the construction of a "Baha'i faith" (lower-case "f"), i.e., as religious ecology. I explain this idea in one of my papers: "Numerous approaches to scriptural hermeneutics have been developed. The revealed Word, the transmission of the knowledge of God, might be compared with a driver; historicism, the Prophetic ecology of the dialectical God-Man and His Revelation situated in their original cultural, historical, bodily, and linguistic contexts, to the vehicle; and religous ecology (or cultural syncretism), the recontextualizations of the revealed Word into multiple normative structurizations, to the destination. "A distinction can, therefore, be drawn between religion as divine Revelation and religion as social construction. The first, Prophetic ecology, is the proclamation of the Word of God, the Logos, or the Teachings of an embodied Messenger to a peculiarized cultural, historical, and physical audience. The second, designated as religious ecology, is a fundamentally human phenomenon. "From the standpoint of religious ecology, revealed religions do not operate in a vacuum. Rather, given the dynamic interplay between an original Revelation and the individuals and groups which receive it, one may speak of multiple Judaisms, Buddhisms, Christianities, Islams, Bahá'í faiths, etc. "Ergo, the Bahá'í faith in Iran is not precisely the Bahá'í faith in the United States. In the latter, the Bahá'í Faith has been commingled, among diverse persons and groups, with elements of Protestantism, the New Age Movement, New Thought, the Enlightenment project, and other systems of thought. While this religious ecology is inevitable, as Bahá'ís refashion their understandings of their literature and as their social situations change, their Bahá'í faiths will also presumably undergo modification. "Acknowledging that narratives are inexact and perspectival (as with the Jain doctrine of anakanta), allowing for diverse, even contradictory, divine and human reality constructions, one should simultaneously recognize, even advocate and celebrate, a radical multidoxy or polydoxy of variegated Bahá'í faiths and a similarly radical orthopraxy of covenantal obedience. Indeed, heresy (Greek, hairesis) is presented throughout the Christian New Testament, not as the benign presence of alternative beliefs, but as the self-willed promotion of malignant division." http://tech.structurization.com/ >>There's also the problem of a much deeper divide, namely the divide between >>those who to varying degrees and from varying perspectives still hold to >>Marxist analyses of socio-economic situations and those who believe that >>Marxism in whatever form is a historically discredited philosophy that in its >>programmatic materialism, atheism and belief in force/violence is essentially >>incompatible with the Baha'i Writings.<< I definitely do not think that Marx has been discredited. If anything, the value of his historical-dialectical methodology is becoming more evident. However, when I referred to a Baha'i liberation theology, I did not mean Marx. >>Indeed, I would venture to say that the main Baha'i requirements for economic >>justice - such as profit-sharing, abolition (not by force) of the extremes >>of wealth and poverty - are compatible with a reformed capitalism, i.e. >>compatible with an economic system that actually works. IOW, a Baha'i >>liberation theology would repeat the split between revolutionaries and >>reformers.<< The anticipated (local) Houses of Finance (storehouses) are about as socialistic as anything I have seen. Given that `Abdu'l-Baha referred both to these storehouses and, in _Some Answered Questions_, to the rights of capitalists, it seems to me that His perspective would, today, be something like democratic socialism. Many democratic socialists have no problem with private ownership on the local level, but they want to see the dissolution of the corporatocracy and the protection of the workers. V
RE: Baha'i Liberation "Theology" ((long quote))
Susan, At 10:14 AM 10/3/2005, you wrote: >>True. However, child labor is rarely even an issue in post-industrial >>societies. It is in those countries still in the process of industrialization >>where it has become a problem.<< True, but some of those societies are places like China and India. Receiving a baccalaureate is, in some ways, even more important in these two countries than in the U.S. or Western Europe; and child labor, by keeping people mired in the underclass, makes that unlikely. Via moderna, Mark A. Foster . http://markfoster.net ... [a] word is ... a universal. - William of Ockham Structurization Tech: http://tech.structurization.com The information contained in this e-mail and any attachments thereto ("e-mail") is sent by the Johnson County Community College ("JCCC") and is intended to be confidential and for the use of only the individual or entity named above. The information may be protected by federal and state privacy and disclosures acts or other legal rules. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are notified that retention, dissemination, distribution or copying of this e-mail is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error please immediately notify JCCC by email reply and immediately and permanently delete this e-mail message and any attachments thereto. Thank you. __ You are subscribed to Baha'i Studies as: mailto:archive@mail-archive.com Unsubscribe: send a blank email to mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Subscribe: send subscribe bahai-st in the message body to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subscribe: http://list.jccc.edu:8080/read/all_forums/subscribe?name=bahai-st Baha'i Studies is available through the following: Mail - mailto:bahai-st@list.jccc.edu Web - http://list.jccc.edu:8080/read/?forum=bahai-st News - news://list.jccc.edu/bahai-st Public - http://www.escribe.com/religion/bahaist Old Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.net New Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.edu
RE: Baha'i Liberation "Theology" ((long quote))
Dear Friends, In the exchanges already seen, we observe the main problem in establishing a Baha'i liberation theology: disunity. There is simply no agreement on what constitutes a problem - and more importantly, by what means to seek a solution. Moreover, we also have the problems caused by those who are - supposedly - on 'our side' but whose presence or 'support' weakens whatever cause we work for. There's also the problem of a much deeper divide, namely the divide between those who to varying degrees and from varying perspectives still hold to Marxist analyses of socio-economic situations and those who believe that Marxism in whatever form is a historically discredited philosophy that in its programmatic materialism, atheism and belief in force/violence is essentially incompatible with the Baha'i Writings. Indeed, I would venture to say that the main Baha'i requirements for economic justice - such as profit-sharing, abolition (not by force)of the extremes of wealth and poverty - are compatible with a reformed capitalism, i.e. compatible with an economic system that actually works. IOW, a Baha'i liberation theology would repeat the split between revolutionaries and reformers. Best wishes, Ian Kluge -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Rich Ater Sent: October 2, 2005 9:24 PM To: Baha'i Studies Subject: Re: Baha'i Liberation "Theology" ((long quote)) > >I certainly don't think we must eschew all activism. For instance, if >Baha'is think it appropriate to boycott certain multi-nationals that >routinely contract work out to those who utilize child labor, that's fine, >IMO. > Granted. >We shouldn't oppose governments but there is no reason we can't oppose >corporations.I'm personally not opposed to child labor for sentimental >reasons, however. Children have always worked throughout most of history. > > This is different than the child labor I'm referring to. Kids working along side there parents is one thing. Kids sold to rug makers and dyers and chained to looms in pakistan are another. The sentimental reasons you may harbor are not reflected in the reality I'm discussing here. > The problem with >child labor in an industrial society is that it drags down the wages for >adults below subsistence. > > The problem with child labor in an industrial society is that it usually coupled with brutality and coersion, such as the 14 year old girls used in Nike factories. >Rich > > > > > > > The information contained in this e-mail and any attachments thereto ("e-mail") is sent by the Johnson County Community College ("JCCC") and is intended to be confidential and for the use of only the individual or entity named above. The information may be protected by federal and state privacy and disclosures acts or other legal rules. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are notified that retention, dissemination, distribution or copying of this e-mail is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error please immediately notify JCCC by email reply and immediately and permanently delete this e-mail message and any attachments thereto. Thank you. __ You are subscribed to Baha'i Studies as: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: send a blank email to mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Subscribe: send subscribe bahai-st in the message body to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subscribe: http://list.jccc.edu:8080/read/all_forums/subscribe?name=bahai-st Baha'i Studies is available through the following: Mail - mailto:bahai-st@list.jccc.edu Web - http://list.jccc.edu:8080/read/?forum=bahai-st News - news://list.jccc.edu/bahai-st Public - http://www.escribe.com/religion/bahaist Old Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.net New Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.edu __ You are subscribed to Baha'i Studies as: mailto:archive@mail-archive.com Unsubscribe: send a blank email to mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Subscribe: send subscribe bahai-st in the message body to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subscribe: http://list.jccc.edu:8080/read/all_forums/subscribe?name=bahai-st Baha'i Studies is available through the following: Mail - mailto:bahai-st@list.jccc.edu Web - http://list.jccc.edu:8080/read/?forum=bahai-st News - news://list.jccc.edu/bahai-st Public - http://www.escribe.com/religion/bahaist Old Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.net New Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.edu
RE: Baha'i Liberation "Theology" ((long quote))
"I think that there are other problems associated with child labor. For instance, postindustrial societies, including those in the West, now require that individuals receive at least a baccalaureate to be competitive in the global economy. Child labor frequently makes it difficult, if not impossible, for them to obtain the preparations necessary to be accepted into a college or university or to have a successful academic experience." True. However, child labor is rarely even an issue in post-industrial societies. It is in those countries still in the process of industrialization where it has become a problem. warmest, Susan The information contained in this e-mail and any attachments thereto ("e-mail") is sent by the Johnson County Community College ("JCCC") and is intended to be confidential and for the use of only the individual or entity named above. The information may be protected by federal and state privacy and disclosures acts or other legal rules. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are notified that retention, dissemination, distribution or copying of this e-mail is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error please immediately notify JCCC by email reply and immediately and permanently delete this e-mail message and any attachments thereto. Thank you. __ You are subscribed to Baha'i Studies as: mailto:archive@mail-archive.com Unsubscribe: send a blank email to mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Subscribe: send subscribe bahai-st in the message body to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subscribe: http://list.jccc.edu:8080/read/all_forums/subscribe?name=bahai-st Baha'i Studies is available through the following: Mail - mailto:bahai-st@list.jccc.edu Web - http://list.jccc.edu:8080/read/?forum=bahai-st News - news://list.jccc.edu/bahai-st Public - http://www.escribe.com/religion/bahaist Old Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.net New Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.edu
RE: Baha'i Liberation "Theology" ((long quote))
Susan, At 10:02 PM 10/2/2005, you wrote: >>I'm personally not opposed to child labor for sentimental reasons, however. >>Children have always worked throughout most of history. But formally they >>worked under the supervision of their parents or other family members instead >>of being sent out to sweat shop. The problem with child labor in an >>industrial society is that it drags down the wages for adults below >>subsistence.<< I think that there are other problems associated with child labor. For instance, postindustrial societies, including those in the West, now require that individuals receive at least a baccalaureate to be competitive in the global economy. Child labor frequently makes it difficult, if not impossible, for them to obtain the preparations necessary to be accepted into a college or university or to have a successful academic experience. Via moderna, Mark A. Foster . http://markfoster.net ... [a] word is ... a universal. - William of Ockham Structurization Tech: http://tech.structurization.com The information contained in this e-mail and any attachments thereto ("e-mail") is sent by the Johnson County Community College ("JCCC") and is intended to be confidential and for the use of only the individual or entity named above. The information may be protected by federal and state privacy and disclosures acts or other legal rules. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are notified that retention, dissemination, distribution or copying of this e-mail is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error please immediately notify JCCC by email reply and immediately and permanently delete this e-mail message and any attachments thereto. Thank you. __ You are subscribed to Baha'i Studies as: mailto:archive@mail-archive.com Unsubscribe: send a blank email to mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Subscribe: send subscribe bahai-st in the message body to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subscribe: http://list.jccc.edu:8080/read/all_forums/subscribe?name=bahai-st Baha'i Studies is available through the following: Mail - mailto:bahai-st@list.jccc.edu Web - http://list.jccc.edu:8080/read/?forum=bahai-st News - news://list.jccc.edu/bahai-st Public - http://www.escribe.com/religion/bahaist Old Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.net New Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.edu
Re: Baha'i Liberation "Theology" ((long quote))
Rich, At 09:13 PM 10/2/2005, you wrote: >>Baha'u'llah says we should admonish the rich. How do we do that if we eschew >>all activism?<< I agree. It is certainly true that Baha'is, irrespective of their economic status, are encouraged to exhibit radiant acquiescence in the face of suffering and distress. However, I see that as a totally separate issue from the actions that Baha'is take for others - or that a poor person would take on behalf of members of her family, community, or society. In a few of the pilgrims' notes about `Abdu'l-Baha, it appears fairly clear that, while He was willing to suffer, He did not tolerate injustice - even when He Himself was the victim. In particular, I have in mind one of several versions of the story in which He was overcharged for a taxicab ride. In at least one of them, He paid the correct (not the inflated) fair and refused to tip the driver. Via moderna, Mark A. Foster . http://markfoster.net ... [a] word is ... a universal. - William of Ockham Structurization Tech: http://tech.structurization.com The information contained in this e-mail and any attachments thereto ("e-mail") is sent by the Johnson County Community College ("JCCC") and is intended to be confidential and for the use of only the individual or entity named above. The information may be protected by federal and state privacy and disclosures acts or other legal rules. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are notified that retention, dissemination, distribution or copying of this e-mail is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error please immediately notify JCCC by email reply and immediately and permanently delete this e-mail message and any attachments thereto. Thank you. __ You are subscribed to Baha'i Studies as: mailto:archive@mail-archive.com Unsubscribe: send a blank email to mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Subscribe: send subscribe bahai-st in the message body to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subscribe: http://list.jccc.edu:8080/read/all_forums/subscribe?name=bahai-st Baha'i Studies is available through the following: Mail - mailto:bahai-st@list.jccc.edu Web - http://list.jccc.edu:8080/read/?forum=bahai-st News - news://list.jccc.edu/bahai-st Public - http://www.escribe.com/religion/bahaist Old Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.net New Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.edu
Re: Baha'i Liberation "Theology" ((long quote))
I certainly don't think we must eschew all activism. For instance, if Baha'is think it appropriate to boycott certain multi-nationals that routinely contract work out to those who utilize child labor, that's fine, IMO. Granted. We shouldn't oppose governments but there is no reason we can't oppose corporations.I'm personally not opposed to child labor for sentimental reasons, however. Children have always worked throughout most of history. This is different than the child labor I'm referring to. Kids working along side there parents is one thing. Kids sold to rug makers and dyers and chained to looms in pakistan are another. The sentimental reasons you may harbor are not reflected in the reality I'm discussing here. The problem with child labor in an industrial society is that it drags down the wages for adults below subsistence. The problem with child labor in an industrial society is that it usually coupled with brutality and coersion, such as the 14 year old girls used in Nike factories. Rich The information contained in this e-mail and any attachments thereto ("e-mail") is sent by the Johnson County Community College ("JCCC") and is intended to be confidential and for the use of only the individual or entity named above. The information may be protected by federal and state privacy and disclosures acts or other legal rules. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are notified that retention, dissemination, distribution or copying of this e-mail is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error please immediately notify JCCC by email reply and immediately and permanently delete this e-mail message and any attachments thereto. Thank you. __ You are subscribed to Baha'i Studies as: mailto:archive@mail-archive.com Unsubscribe: send a blank email to mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Subscribe: send subscribe bahai-st in the message body to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subscribe: http://list.jccc.edu:8080/read/all_forums/subscribe?name=bahai-st Baha'i Studies is available through the following: Mail - mailto:bahai-st@list.jccc.edu Web - http://list.jccc.edu:8080/read/?forum=bahai-st News - news://list.jccc.edu/bahai-st Public - http://www.escribe.com/religion/bahaist Old Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.net New Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.edu
RE: Baha'i Liberation "Theology" ((long quote))
"So, as a Baha'i should I not be active in issues such as forced child labor, first world incursions into the third world, or a variety of other issues that the Faith speaks out about. Baha'u'llah says we should admonish the rich. How do we do that if we eschew all activism?" Dear Rich, I certainly don't think we must eschew all activism. For instance, if Baha'is think it appropriate to boycott certain multi-nationals that routinely contract work out to those who utilize child labor, that's fine, IMO. We shouldn't oppose governments but there is no reason we can't oppose corporations.I'm personally not opposed to child labor for sentimental reasons, however. Children have always worked throughout most of history. But formally they worked under the supervision of their parents or other family members instead of being sent out to sweat shop. The problem with child labor in an industrial society is that it drags down the wages for adults below subsistence. warmest, Susan The information contained in this e-mail and any attachments thereto ("e-mail") is sent by the Johnson County Community College ("JCCC") and is intended to be confidential and for the use of only the individual or entity named above. The information may be protected by federal and state privacy and disclosures acts or other legal rules. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are notified that retention, dissemination, distribution or copying of this e-mail is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error please immediately notify JCCC by email reply and immediately and permanently delete this e-mail message and any attachments thereto. Thank you. __ You are subscribed to Baha'i Studies as: mailto:archive@mail-archive.com Unsubscribe: send a blank email to mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Subscribe: send subscribe bahai-st in the message body to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subscribe: http://list.jccc.edu:8080/read/all_forums/subscribe?name=bahai-st Baha'i Studies is available through the following: Mail - mailto:bahai-st@list.jccc.edu Web - http://list.jccc.edu:8080/read/?forum=bahai-st News - news://list.jccc.edu/bahai-st Public - http://www.escribe.com/religion/bahaist Old Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.net New Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.edu
Re: Baha'i Liberation "Theology" ((long quote))
Susan Maneck wrote: One problem in interpreting Baha'i doctrine as "Liberation Theology" lies in the fact that Baha'is are usually discouraged from involving themselves in political affairs. Cole regards this a temporary measure adopted by `Abdu'l-Baha, made in response to the turmoil of the Iranian Constitutional Revolution which has been maintained by the Baha'i community in its early stage of development to avoid internal divisions. Cole argues that avoidance of party politics should not exclude social activism among Baha'is. "The poor, like other Baha'is," according to Cole, "are called upon to denounce tyranny and infractions against basic human rights, to work for parliamentary democracy, to allow for the expression of the views of the humblest Baha'i within the community, and to reform the world's economy so as to reflect the divine attribute of justice" (93). Susan, I followed what you were saying, and I agree that we should eschew partisan politics. The problem is that I think we take that too far and eschew all political stances. I agree with Mark's statement as someone with a Marxist bent that theory must be followed with praxis. So, as a Baha'i should I not be active in issues such as forced child labor, first world incursions into the third world, or a variety of other issues that the Faith speaks out about. Baha'u'llah says we should admonish the rich. How do we do that if we eschew all activism? The House condemned free market capitalism in the Century of Light, should I remain silent about it's practices? I bring this up for discussion because they're important issues. Rich The information contained in this e-mail and any attachments thereto ("e-mail") is sent by the Johnson County Community College ("JCCC") and is intended to be confidential and for the use of only the individual or entity named above. The information may be protected by federal and state privacy and disclosures acts or other legal rules. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are notified that retention, dissemination, distribution or copying of this e-mail is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error please immediately notify JCCC by email reply and immediately and permanently delete this e-mail message and any attachments thereto. Thank you. __ You are subscribed to Baha'i Studies as: mailto:archive@mail-archive.com Unsubscribe: send a blank email to mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Subscribe: send subscribe bahai-st in the message body to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subscribe: http://list.jccc.edu:8080/read/all_forums/subscribe?name=bahai-st Baha'i Studies is available through the following: Mail - mailto:bahai-st@list.jccc.edu Web - http://list.jccc.edu:8080/read/?forum=bahai-st News - news://list.jccc.edu/bahai-st Public - http://www.escribe.com/religion/bahaist Old Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.net New Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.edu
RE: Baha'i Liberation "Theology" ((long quote))
"A Baha'i liberation theology might use the language of other liberation theologies, but it would, IMO, need to be grounded in the Baha'i primary sources." Yes, the problem with Juan's work is it was too selective in its use of sources. Sound theology needs to consider and take into account all of the relevant material. warmest, Susan The information contained in this e-mail and any attachments thereto ("e-mail") is sent by the Johnson County Community College ("JCCC") and is intended to be confidential and for the use of only the individual or entity named above. The information may be protected by federal and state privacy and disclosures acts or other legal rules. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are notified that retention, dissemination, distribution or copying of this e-mail is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error please immediately notify JCCC by email reply and immediately and permanently delete this e-mail message and any attachments thereto. Thank you. __ You are subscribed to Baha'i Studies as: mailto:archive@mail-archive.com Unsubscribe: send a blank email to mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Subscribe: send subscribe bahai-st in the message body to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subscribe: http://list.jccc.edu:8080/read/all_forums/subscribe?name=bahai-st Baha'i Studies is available through the following: Mail - mailto:bahai-st@list.jccc.edu Web - http://list.jccc.edu:8080/read/?forum=bahai-st News - news://list.jccc.edu/bahai-st Public - http://www.escribe.com/religion/bahaist Old Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.net New Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.edu
RE: Baha'i Liberation "Theology" ((long quote))
Susan, At 05:21 PM 10/2/2005, you wrote: >>Several years ago Juan Cole wrote an article on the Baha'i Faith and >>liberation theology. Here is the review I wrote to that artice:<< There are, of course, many liberation "theologies." Although liberation theology began among Latin American Jesuits, I also have books on Protestant liberation theologies, Muslim liberation theologies, Jewish liberation theologies, African American liberation theologies, and feminist liberation thealogies (with an "a"). A Baha'i liberation theology might use the language of other liberation theologies, but it would, IMO, need to be grounded in the Baha'i primary sources. Via moderna, Mark A. Foster . http://markfoster.net ... [a] word is ... a universal. - William of Ockham Structurization Tech: http://tech.structurization.com The information contained in this e-mail and any attachments thereto ("e-mail") is sent by the Johnson County Community College ("JCCC") and is intended to be confidential and for the use of only the individual or entity named above. The information may be protected by federal and state privacy and disclosures acts or other legal rules. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are notified that retention, dissemination, distribution or copying of this e-mail is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error please immediately notify JCCC by email reply and immediately and permanently delete this e-mail message and any attachments thereto. Thank you. __ You are subscribed to Baha'i Studies as: mailto:archive@mail-archive.com Unsubscribe: send a blank email to mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Subscribe: send subscribe bahai-st in the message body to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subscribe: http://list.jccc.edu:8080/read/all_forums/subscribe?name=bahai-st Baha'i Studies is available through the following: Mail - mailto:bahai-st@list.jccc.edu Web - http://list.jccc.edu:8080/read/?forum=bahai-st News - news://list.jccc.edu/bahai-st Public - http://www.escribe.com/religion/bahaist Old Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.net New Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.edu
RE: Baha'i Liberation "Theology" ((long quote))
Several years ago Juan Cole wrote an article on the Baha'i Faith and liberation theology. Here is the review I wrote to that artice: In "Baha'u'llah and Liberation Theology" Professor Juan Cole discusses the implications of Baha'u'llah's revelation in terms of the Liberation Theology developed within Latin American. Liberation Theology draws upon the Exodus story and the prophetic tradition as a whole to express God's special commitment to and identification with the plight of the the poor as a means for legitimizing their struggle for justice involving, in most cases, some form of political agitation, whether violent or non-violent. It is therefore a theology of revolution. He argues that while the Baha'i Faith eschews both violence and party politics as a means to obtain its goals of social transformation, a theology of liberation, is integral to Baha'u'llah's revelation. Cole seeks to establish this by drawing upon such statements from the Writings such as "the Ancient Beauty hath consented to be bound with chains that mankind may be released from its bondage" (80). Cole points to the contrasts Baha'u'llah makes between the spiritual dangers and temptations associated with wealth versus the virtues of poverty. From this the conclusion is drawn that the poor are spiritually superior to the rich and are their equals in civil society, for Baha'u'llah urges all to "eat with the same mouth and dwell in the same land" (84). Besides criticizing excessive attachment to worldly riches, Baha'u'llah condemns political tyranny as well. While Baha'u'llah urges the poor to endure their sufferings patiently, He stresses their dignity and independent agency by encouraging them to strive to obtain an adequate means of livelihood. According to Cole, Baha'u'llah also calls upon them to work "ceaselessly toward the creation of a new civilization wherein the extreme of wealth and poverty would be eliminated at last" (92). One problem in interpreting Baha'i doctrine as "Liberation Theology" lies in the fact that Baha'is are usually discouraged from involving themselves in political affairs. Cole regards this a temporary measure adopted by `Abdu'l-Baha, made in response to the turmoil of the Iranian Constitutional Revolution which has been maintained by the Baha'i community in its early stage of development to avoid internal divisions. Cole argues that avoidance of party politics should not exclude social activism among Baha'is. "The poor, like other Baha'is," according to Cole, "are called upon to denounce tyranny and infractions against basic human rights, to work for parliamentary democracy, to allow for the expression of the views of the humblest Baha'i within the community, and to reform the world's economy so as to reflect the divine attribute of justice" (93). In connection with this Cole points out that Baha'u'llah calls for state intervention the poor by implementing a graduated income tax, prohibiting slavery, and cutting back on military budgets. Indeed, what Baha'u'llah expects is basic structural changes grounded in faith and universal love which will bring about the total transformation of society, enriching and empowering the poor. Dr. Cole's essay provides a very provocative look at the implications of Baha'i theology in terms of current political trends. There were several instances, however, where his logic seemed flawed, where historical evidence does not support his basic thesis, and where his selection of scripture was misleadingly unbalanced. He notes, for instance, that the Baha'i Faith membership has largely been drawn from the poor and dispossessed in Third World countries, attracted by the Baha'i system of governance with its emphasis on elected bodies (rather than a professional clergy) which insures that the poor have a real and effective voice within Baha'i communities. This ignores the reluctance on the part of most of impoverished people who have embraced the Baha'i Faith to participate fully in such administrative institutions. It appears highly unlikely that the existence of such bodies were the means of attracting the poor and dispossessed. Equally confusing is Cole's suggestion that a "truly Baha'i society" "would guarantee basic human rights as outlined in United Nations declarations and covenants." It is difficult to reconcile this statement with Dr. Cole's earlier insistence that any Baha'i theology must be grounded in "scripture and theophanology" (81). As laudatory as such United Nations documents might be, they hardly constitute Divine Revelation! Dr. Cole insists that Baha'u'llah's praise for the British style of "parliamentary democracy" [sic] after 1868 indicated His belief that the poor should have a voice in their own governance. While Baha'u'llah would not likely have objected to such sentiments, this can hardly be concluded from His praise of the constitutional monarchy in England, which by 1868 had only enfranchised the moneyed classes. The British Parliament, far which
RE: Baha'i Liberation "Theology"
Thank you thank you dearest Mark for your thread Your poor lowly brother khazeh Although Baha'u'llah was solitary, secluded and unknown in His retirement, the report spread throughout Kurdistan that this was a most remarkable and learned Personage, gifted with a wonderful power of attraction. In a short time Kurdistan was magnetized with His love. During this period Baha'u'llah lived in poverty. His garments were those of the poor and needy. His food was that of the indigent and lowly. An atmosphere of majesty haloed Him as the sun at midday. (`Abdu'l-Baha: Promulgation of Universal Peace*, Page: 26) Tonight I am very happy, for I have come here to meet my friends. I consider you my relatives, my companions; and I am your comrade. You must be thankful to God that you are poor, for Jesus Christ has said, "Blessed are the poor." He never said, "Blessed are the rich." He said, too, that the Kingdom is for the poor and that it is easier for a camel to enter a needle's eye than for a rich man to enter God's Kingdom. Therefore, you must be thankful to God that although in this world you are indigent, yet the treasures of God are within your reach; and although in the material realm you are poor, yet in the Kingdom of God you are precious. Jesus Himself was poor. He did not belong to the rich. He passed His time in the desert, travelling among the poor, and lived upon the herbs of the field. He had no place to lay His head, no home. He was exposed in the open to heat, cold and frost - to inclement weather of all kinds - yet He chose this rather than riches. If riches were considered a glory, the Prophet Moses would have chosen them; Jesus would have been a rich man. When Jesus Christ appeared, it was the poor who first accepted Him, not the rich. Therefore, you are the disciples of Jesus Christ; you are His comrades, for He outwardly was poor, not rich. Even this earth's happiness does not depend upon wealth. You will find many of the wealthy exposed to dangers and troubled by difficulties, and in their last moments upon the bed of death there remains the regret that they must be separated from that to which their hearts are so attached. They come into this world naked, and they must go from it naked. All they possess they must leave behind and pass away solitary, alone. Often at the time of death their souls are filled with remorse; and worst of all, their hope in the mercy of God is less than ours. Praise be to God! Our hope is in the mercy of God, and there is no doubt that the divine compassion is bestowed upon the poor. Jesus Christ said so; Baha'u'llah said so. While Baha'u'llah was in Baghdad, still in possession of great wealth, He left all He had and went alone from the city, living two years among the poor. They were His comrades. He ate with them, slept with them and gloried in being one of them. He chose for one of His names the title of The Poor One and often in His Writings refers to Himself as Darvish, which in Persian means poor; and of this title He was very proud. He admonished all that we must be the servants of the poor, helpers of the poor, remember the sorrows of the poor, associate with them; for thereby we may inherit the Kingdom of heaven. God has not said that there are mansions prepared for us if we pass our time associating with the rich, but He has said there are many mansions prepared for the servants of the poor, for the poor are very dear to God. The mercies and bounties of God are with them. The rich are mostly negligent, inattentive, steeped in worldliness, depending upon their means, whereas the poor are dependent upon God, and their reliance is upon Him, not upon themselves. Therefore, the poor are nearer the threshold of God and His throne. Jesus was a poor man. One night when He was out in the fields, the rain began to fall. He had no place to go for shelter so He lifted His eyes toward heaven, saying, "O Father! For the birds of the air Thou hast created nests, for the sheep a fold, for the animals dens, for the fish places of refuge, but for Me Thou hast provided no shelter. There is no place where I may lay My head. My bed consists of the cold ground; My lamps at night are the stars, and My food is the grass of the field. Yet who upon earth is richer than I? For the greatest blessing Thou hast not given to the rich and mighty but unto Me, for Thou hast given Me the poor. To me Thou hast granted this blessing. They are Mine. Therefore am I the richest man on earth." So, my comrades, you are following in the footsteps of Jesus Christ. Your lives are similar to His life; your attitude is like unto His; you resemble Him more than the rich do. Therefore, we will thank God that we have been so blessed with real riches. And in conclusion, I ask you to accept Abdu'l-Baha as your servant. (`Abdu'l-Baha: Promulgation of Universal Peace*, Pages: 32-34) The information contained in this e-m
Re: Baha'i Liberation "Theology" ((long quote))
Don, At 09:38 AM 10/2/2005, you wrote: >>Before people jump in with all six feet, I strongly urge them to read and >>consider two msgs from the House of Justice. One is found as msg 151 in >>"Messages from the Universal House of Justice, 1963-1986" I don't believe >>the other has been published, so I have included it below.<< I am not suggesting that Baha'is become involved in partisan politics. As I have said here before, even were I not a Baha'i, I would have long ago lost my faith in many of moral, economic, and political problems being resolved in the context of the American framework of partisan politics. (As a non-Baha'i, I would likely have become a Marxist-Trotskyite revolutionary or, perhaps, a social insurrectionary anarchist.) I am referring to reformulating Baha'i-inspired social and economic development projects in light of the statements I quoted on poverty and corporate capitalism. To a Marxist, theory and praxis are inseparable. Therefore, I find it inconceivable that I should be opposed to corporate capitalism and not do something about it. Via moderna, Mark A. Foster . http://markfoster.net ... [a] word is ... a universal. - William of Ockham Structurization Tech: http://tech.structurization.com The information contained in this e-mail and any attachments thereto ("e-mail") is sent by the Johnson County Community College ("JCCC") and is intended to be confidential and for the use of only the individual or entity named above. The information may be protected by federal and state privacy and disclosures acts or other legal rules. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are notified that retention, dissemination, distribution or copying of this e-mail is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error please immediately notify JCCC by email reply and immediately and permanently delete this e-mail message and any attachments thereto. Thank you. __ You are subscribed to Baha'i Studies as: mailto:archive@mail-archive.com Unsubscribe: send a blank email to mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Subscribe: send subscribe bahai-st in the message body to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subscribe: http://list.jccc.edu:8080/read/all_forums/subscribe?name=bahai-st Baha'i Studies is available through the following: Mail - mailto:bahai-st@list.jccc.edu Web - http://list.jccc.edu:8080/read/?forum=bahai-st News - news://list.jccc.edu/bahai-st Public - http://www.escribe.com/religion/bahaist Old Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.net New Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.edu
Re: Baha'i Liberation "Theology" ((long quote))
Title: Re: Baha'i Liberation "Theology" ((long quote)) At 8:29 AM -0500 10/2/05, Mark A. Foster wrote: In a Baha'i liberation "theology," what role, if any, should Baha'is play in freeing the poor from oppressive capitalism? Will we be judged if we do not? How might our social and economic development programs be reconceived in this light? Before people jump in with all six feet, I strongly urge them to read and consider two msgs from the House of Justice. One is found as msg 151 in "Messages from the Universal House of Justice, 1963-1986" I don't believe the other has been published, so I have included it below. Don C =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= The following letter dated October 24, 1990, was written on behalf of the Universal House of Justice to a National Spiritual Assembly that was seeking guidance about the advisability of local Spiritual Assemblies or individual Baha'is associating with activist groups such as the Greenpeace organization. . Dear Baha'i Friends, The Universal House of Justice has received your letter of November 27, 1989. It regrets that the pressure of work has prevented it from responding earlier. We have been directed to convey the following on its behalf. The several issues raised in your letter are best considered in light of the insights conveyed in the Baha'i teachings about the manner in which the innumerable problems of an ailing society can best be resolved and its distressing condition ameliorated. Baha'u'llah has stated in His Tablet to Queen Victoria: "That which the Lord hath ordained as the sovereign remedy and mightiest instrument for the healing of all the world is the union of all its peoples in one universal Cause, one common Faith. This can in no wise be achieved except through the power of a skilled, an all-powerful and inspired Physician. This, verily, is the truth, and all else naught but error." The well-being of humanity is a reflection of its spiritual state, and any enduring change for the better in its material affairs requires a change in its spiritual condition. For this reason the principal concern and contribution of the followers of Baha'u'llah is the spiritual transformation of human society, with full confidence that by this means they are making a most valuable and most fundamental contribution to the betterment of the world and the rectification of its many problems. It is the responsibility of the institutions of the Faith to assist the believers in their endeavors to acquire an accurate and profound understanding of the indissoluble connection between their efforts to propagate the Faith and consolidate its institutions and their commendable desire to contribute to improvement in the quality of human life. They should realize also that their approach to the solution of the world's problems will not be understood, and may even be disparaged by the idealistic materialists whose labors are directed so assiduously to improvement in the material welfare of humanity, and to whom material good is the only standard by which the condition of society is assessed. The Universal House of Justice has stated on an earlier occasion that "most people have no clear concept of the sort of world they wish to build, nor how to go about building it. Even those who are concerned to improve conditions are therefore reduced to combating every apparent evil that takes their attention. Willingness to fight against evils, whether in the form of conditions or embodied in evil men, has thus become for most people the touchstone by which they judge a person's moral worth. Baha'is, on the other hand, know the goal they are working toward and know what they must do, step by step, to attain it. Their whole energy is directed toward the building of the good, a good which has such a positive strength that in the face of it the multitude of evils-which are in essence negative-will fade away and be no more. To enter into the quixotic tournament of demolishing one by one the evils in the world is, to a Baha'i, a vain waste of time and effort. His whole life is directed toward proclaiming the Message of Baha'u'llah, reviving the spiritual life of his fellow-men, uniting them in a divinely created World Order, and then, as that Order grows in strength and influence, he will see the power of that Message transforming the whole of human society and progressively solving the problems and removing the injustices which have so long bedeviled the world." Such a perspective does not mean that Baha'is should avoid doing whatever they can to help others and alleviate human distress, or that they should not associate with and support suitable like-minded organizations. On the contrary, the believers should, at all times, be alert to opportunities to do whatever is within their power to make the conditions of human life better;