RE: Baha'i Liberation "Theology"

2005-12-26 Thread janine van rooij
there has not been a reply to this message of mine, and I am afraid that it may 
be that my post created the wrong impression. 

I have this habit of trying to keep an open mind and so I inquire. I do not see 
how a liberation theology could come about, other than in an organic way, but 
that does not mean for me that there is no other way. Only that I do not see 
it. And I would like to see it. That is why I asked my questions, basically to 
anybody, but specifically to Mark, since he started the topic. 

My motivation is always one of expanding my understanding, vision and mind. I 
am quite a direct person and English is not my first language, so that 
combination may make me sometimes come across in internet discussions as 
aggressive, but that is not my intention. I just have an enquiring mind. 

Janine

 
 
The information contained in this e-mail and any attachments thereto ("e-mail") 
is sent by the Johnson County Community College ("JCCC") and is intended to be 
confidential and for the use of only the individual or entity named above. The 
information may be protected by federal and state privacy and disclosures acts 
or other legal rules. If the reader of this message is not the intended 
recipient, you are notified that retention, dissemination, distribution or 
copying of this e-mail is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail 
in error please immediately notify JCCC by email reply and immediately and 
permanently delete this e-mail message and any attachments thereto. Thank you.
 
 
__
 

You are subscribed to Baha'i Studies as: mailto:archive@mail-archive.com
Unsubscribe: send a blank email to mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subscribe: send subscribe bahai-st in the message body to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subscribe: http://list.jccc.edu:8080/read/all_forums/subscribe?name=bahai-st
Baha'i Studies is available through the following:
Mail - mailto:bahai-st@list.jccc.edu
Web - http://list.jccc.edu:8080/read/?forum=bahai-st
News - news://list.jccc.edu/bahai-st
Public - http://www.escribe.com/religion/bahaist
Old Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.net
New Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.edu


RE: Baha'i Liberation "Theology"

2005-12-16 Thread janine van rooij
I read most of the posts in this thread, an interesting subject. 

I would love to hear your ideas Mark about Bahai Liberation theology. 

I would also love to hear how you see individual Bahais, right now, at this 
point in time, who live in the western countries which are rich, put into 
practice a Bahai Liberation theology. You see, I have no clue. I am a 
practically inclined person who would love to see the suffering of people end 
now more likely than tomorrow, but I feel quite frustrated because there seems 
to be so little I can do in a practical way, except telling people about the 
Bahai teachings and trying to get them to study the Bahai writings for 
themselves. 

When I was in my 20s i heard slowly over about 10 years, how western 
multinationals behave, how for every dollar we give in aid to poor countries we 
get one dollar and 25 cents back. I tried to stop contributing to this kind of 
thing and I found it was almost impossible to do, unless I went to live in the 
desert on almost nothing somewhere, and even then
It looked so big, that I gave up fighting for a bit, though I was always 
careful not to buy things I do not really need. 

Even the demand for cheap goods is something that is two sided. I live now in 
Ireland. I grew up in Holland. In Holland, for more than 35 years the 
governmental system and public opinion ensured that even people who were living 
on social benefit, had a reasonable life. Good housing was provided, they could 
keep themselves warm and get good health care. The children were educated for 
free in quite good schools and after that, getting a bit into debt but not that 
much, could get themselves a college education and/or a degree, up until they 
were 27, starting your studies after 27 meant you had to pay the costs of it 
totally by yourselves. 

Here in Ireland that was never the case. Council estates usally are appalling, 
most council houses do not have central heating (unlike in Holland), medical 
health care, well, the minimum and long waiting lists and only when you are the 
poorest, if you are in the middle there is no net for you, so you can end up 
being even poorer than someone on social benefit, unless you live in a council 
house of course. 
I believe college fees are free or were free (am not so sure now) but the 
schools are not the best, private schools are far better than state schools, 
unlike in Holland and if you are from a council estate (which immediately 
pinpoints you in a particular economic class) and have gone to a state school 
chances are very small that you get sufficient support to think about getting a 
degree, let alone finish one. The good thing is that to get a good job more and 
more a degree or at least a diploma is required, so from that point of view 
more and more young people will be stimulated to go to college. 

I never earned much money, not even when I was living in Holland. I could get 
by but that usually also had to do with the choices I made: not going on 
holiday as much as other people of my age did, not driving a car and often 
living in the cheapest rented houses. For quite a long time I lived in a 
studio, with the bare necessities. 

When I came to Ireland, I had no money to buy a house and rents were and still 
are, very high. I shared for a long time with other people, lived in damp and 
expensive places, until the rents dropped a little and I live now in a two 
bedroomed but very luxurious house, ending up paying half of my salary in rent, 
which means i cannot save money. I can of course share again, but after so long 
of sharing and living in cramped places (most of my life) I love to have a bit 
of privacy in my middle years. That is the choice I make. 
Food, clothing etc. are far more expensive here in Ireland than they are in 
Holland, let alone the USA. Electronic goods and services ditto. Under these 
circumstances buying the cheapest available goods becomes a necessity, is not a 
matter of choice anymore. Should prices go up more, I would have to let go of 
even the very small luxuries I have, not be able to buy books but maybe one or 
two a year and would certainly have to give up broadband. 

Compared to many people in poorer countries I am rich beyond means.
That is the irony of it, because to be able to have a reasonable life in a rich 
country, you need certain things you would not need so much in a poor country 
as one of the richer poor people. Of course whne you are the poorest of the 
poor in a rich country, you are constantly on starvation point and most 
probably do not have a home to go to. 

The current system is wrong, as it is driven by greed solely and it needs to be 
balanced. I would love to see it change. The only way I think it can change is 
when enough people accept the teachings of the Bahai faith and are willing to 
be obedient to the guidance as given to the world through the administrative 
order. 
Not because I think that when enough people are doing both, we all of

RE: Baha'i Liberation "Theology" ((long quote))

2005-10-16 Thread Ian Kluge
Dear Mark, 


You write: 

At 12:41 PM 10/13/2005, you wrote:
>>Whether or not there is in your opinion such a 'thing' as a communist
state is not the point. The point is that both Yugoslavs did in fact live in
a communist state - as do North Koreans. Both suffer(ed) oppression based on
and justified by the Marxist and Leninist (and in Korea's case Stalinist)<<

"Our perspectives are so far apart on this subject that I doubt we will ever
agree."

Agreed. 

You write:

"Only the Soviet Union, at the time of Lenin, lived in Leninist system. The
Koreans live under Kim Il Sung's system; and the Yugoslavs lived under
Marshall Tito's system. You can't take an idea out of its original
historical context, recontextualize it, and expect it to look the same. I am
surprised that you would even suggest it."

They were all singing from the same page albeit in different voices and with
a few occasional variations thrown in. But in each case it was the same
song: command economy, class struggle, dialectical and historical
materialism, revolutionary vanguard etc. 

You write:

"If these systems have borrowed, to varying degrees, from Lenin's (or
Marx's) ideas, that can be argued and defended. However, isomorphism cannot,
at least not without committing several logical fallacies, be assumed a
priori based simply on shared vocabulary, on limited observed resemblances,
or on the fact that certain people have elected to place them into the same
category."

Who's doing that? 

You write:   

"And how does that make North Korea either a socialist or a communist
society? If anything, you have just defeated your own argument. Karl Marx
never advocated oppressing the Lumpenproletariat in the name of protecting
them from "would-be class enemies."

So, you are arguing that NK is not a Communist state? Despite its open
adherence to Marx, Lenin, Stalin etc. . . 

I never said the Lumpproletariat were the class enemies against which the NK
regime was oppressing its own people. The class enemies  are (a) the
internal agents of the external capitalists - read U.S.  and (b) the
capitalist world itself but chiefly the U.S. 

You write: 

"Precision is important."

I'm surprised to see you making such a claim since according to you a word
can mean anything we, I or you or anyone else want it to mean. So it boils
down to the question of 'precision - according to whom?'

You write: 
 
>>Totalitarian 1 (Wikipedia): "A totalitarian régime or state attempts to
*control nearly every aspect* of personal, economic, and political life",<<

"That is standard usage - and China is allowing free markets which would
differ with the definition you provided. The rest of your definitions are
comparable to the above."

My original definition of totalitarianism already included the Wikipedia
definition: I said that totalitarianism does not recognise the distinction
between public and private spheres and therefore interferes in both. 

As I also pointed out, Russia is no longer Communist at all although it is
somewhat authoritarian, and China is in an intermediate stage, divesting
itself of Communism but still retaining important features of Communist
totalitarianism. 

You write: 

"The revolutionary (proletarian) vanguard are not, using Marx's definitions,
"dictators" until they have seized the apparatus of the state. At that
point, they, minus any members of the bourgeoisie and intelligentsia who may
have assisted them, constitute a dictatorship of the proletariat
(socialism)."

Through the Communist Party the proletariat have seized the state and are
thus ruling themselves. Whether or not the Party can include intelligentsia
("brain workers") is an old question Communists have never decisively
resolved amongst themselves. 

You write: 

"I disagree - if we are using Marx's definitions. He was very precise."

Back to definitions. Marx is not noted for his precision - hence the bitter
disputes among early and late communists and even modern communists.  

You write: 

>>OK, so let me rephrase that: the vision of a stateless modern
industrialized world/society is sweet but naively idealistic especially in
light of the actual history of Communism.<<

"I don't disagree with that. IMO, most of Marx's vision is eminently
impractical and out of date. That is why there are few "pure" Marxists left
(early or late Marxists)."

It's good to know we can agree on something. 

You write: 

I wrote:
The similarities, IMO, were either a result of oppression (the iron
curtain) or were mostly linguistic (using the same word to describe North
Korea and Yugoslavia or Lenin and Stalin).

Ian replied:
>>The similarities may be linguistic to you, but that doesn't mean the
similarities are not real.<<

"I did not say that all the similarities were entirely linguistic."

But you did say they "were *mostly* linguistic" in the case of NK and
Yugoslavia. (See above) IOW, you tried to dismiss the similarities as either
chimerical, superficial or unimportant. My point is that th

RE: Baha'i Liberation "Theology" ((long quote)) (ERROR)

2005-10-14 Thread Ian Kluge
Dear Mark, -


I hit send instead of save. I'll send the rest when I'm done. 

Best wishes,

Ian Kluge




 
 
The information contained in this e-mail and any attachments thereto ("e-mail") 
is sent by the Johnson County Community College ("JCCC") and is intended to be 
confidential and for the use of only the individual or entity named above. The 
information may be protected by federal and state privacy and disclosures acts 
or other legal rules. If the reader of this message is not the intended 
recipient, you are notified that retention, dissemination, distribution or 
copying of this e-mail is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail 
in error please immediately notify JCCC by email reply and immediately and 
permanently delete this e-mail message and any attachments thereto. Thank you.
 
 
__
 

You are subscribed to Baha'i Studies as: mailto:archive@mail-archive.com
Unsubscribe: send a blank email to mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subscribe: send subscribe bahai-st in the message body to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subscribe: http://list.jccc.edu:8080/read/all_forums/subscribe?name=bahai-st
Baha'i Studies is available through the following:
Mail - mailto:bahai-st@list.jccc.edu
Web - http://list.jccc.edu:8080/read/?forum=bahai-st
News - news://list.jccc.edu/bahai-st
Public - http://www.escribe.com/religion/bahaist
Old Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.net
New Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.edu


RE: Baha'i Liberation "Theology" ((long quote))

2005-10-14 Thread Ian Kluge
Dear Mark, 


You write: 

At 12:41 PM 10/13/2005, you wrote:
>>Whether or not there is in your opinion such a 'thing' as a communist
state is not the point. The point is that both Yugoslavs did in fact live in
a communist state - as do North Koreans. Both suffer(ed) oppression based on
and justified by the Marxist and Leninist (and in Korea's case Stalinist)<<

"Our perspectives are so far apart on this subject that I doubt we will ever
agree."

Agreed. 

You write:

"Only the Soviet Union, at the time of Lenin, lived in Leninist system. The
Koreans live under Kim Il Sung's system; and the Yugoslavs lived under
Marshall Tito's system. You can't take an idea out of its original
historical context, recontextualize it, and expect it to look the same. I am
surprised that you would even suggest it."

They were all singing from the same page albeit in different voce's and with
a few occasional variations thrown in. But in each case it was the same
song: command economy, class struggle, dialectical and historical
materialism, etc. 

You write:

"If these systems have borrowed, to varying degrees, from Lenin's (or
Marx's) ideas, that can be argued and defended. However, isomorphism cannot,
at least not without committing several logical fallacies, be assumed a
priori based simply on shared vocabulary, on limited observed resemblances,
or on the fact that certain people have elected to place them into the same
category."

Certainly not. Isomorpthism is based on similarity of
structure/organization, process or purpose  - or as we say in traditional
philosophy, form, content, modus operandi and purpose (final cause). (The
more things change the more they stay the same.)  When things share
significant features of form, and content, modus operandi and final cause,
they are isomorphic to that degree. 

They shared institutional, coercive, normative and mimetic isomorphism.

You write:   

>>Class struggle is obviously present in NK in the form of the tremendous
oppression inflicted upon the people/prolateraiat in the name of protecting
them from an exploitive would-be class enemies.<<

"And how does that make North Korea either a socialist or a communist
society? If anything, you have just defeated your own argument. Karl Marx
never advocated oppressing the Lumpenproletariat in the name of protecting
them from "would-be class enemies."

So, you are arguing that NK is not a Communist state? Despite its open
adherence to Marx, Lenin, Stalin etc. 

This has nothing to do with the Lumpenproletariat.

 

>>Here we go again - another battle of definitions!<<

Precision is important.
 
>>Totalitarian 1 (Wikipedia): "A totalitarian régime or state attempts to
*control nearly every aspect* of personal, economic, and political life",<<

That is standard usage - and China is allowing free markets which would
differ with the definition you provided. The rest of your definitions are
comparable to the above. 

As I said, China (and Russia) would, today, qualify as authoritarian, not as
totalitarian.

>>(1) If that's true, matters are even worse - 2 dictatorships instead of
one: (a) the dictatorship of the revolutionary vanguard followed by (b) the
dictatorship of the proletariat followed by an imaginary withering away of
the state. How can anyone take this seriously?<<

The revolutionary (proletarian) vanguard are not, using Marx's definitions,
"dictators" until they have seized the apparatus of the state. At that
point, they, minus any members of the bourgeoisie and intelligentsia who may
have assisted them, constitute a dictatorship of the proletariat
(socialism).

>>(2) It's purely a matter of interpretation whether or not the Communist
states reached the dictatorship of the proletariat.<<

I disagree - if we are using Marx's definitions. He was very precise.

>>OK, so let me rephrase that: the vision of a stateless modern
industrialized world/society is sweet but naively idealistic especially in
light of the actual history of Communism.<<

I don't disagree with that. IMO, most of Marx's vision is eminently
impractical and out of date. That is why there are few "pure" Marxists left
(early or late Marxists). 

I wrote:
The similarities, IMO, were either a result of oppression (the iron
curtain) or were mostly linguistic (using the same word to describe North
Korea and Yugoslavia or Lenin and Stalin).

You replied:
>>The similarities may be linguistic to you, but that doesn't mean the
similarities are not real.<<

I did not say that all the similarities were entirely linguistic.

>>(2) Total oppression is itself one of the similarities that all Communist
states share.<<

"Total oppression" is just words. Do you mean totalitarianism? How was there
"total oppression" in Yugoslavia? How is there total oppression in modern
mainland China?

>>That's all very fine, but the fact is that Communism is so inept in its
analysis of reality and its actions that it could not even last a century
either economically or socially.<<

Communi

RE: Baha'i Liberation "Theology" ((long quote))

2005-10-13 Thread Mark A. Foster
Ian,

At 12:41 PM 10/13/2005, you wrote:
>>Whether or not there is in your opinion such a 'thing' as a communist state 
>>is not the point. The point is that both Yugoslavs did in fact live in a 
>>communist state - as do North Koreans. Both suffer(ed) oppression based on 
>>and justified by the Marxist and Leninist (and in Korea's case Stalinist)<<

Our perspectives are so far apart on this subject that I doubt we will ever 
agree. Only the Soviet Union, at the time of Lenin, lived in Leninist system. 
The Koreans live under Kim Il Sung's system; and the Yugoslavs lived under 
Marshall Tito's system. You can't take an idea out of its original historical 
context, recontextualize it, and expect it to look the same. I am surprised 
that you would even suggest it.

If these systems have borrowed, to varying degrees, from Lenin's (or Marx's) 
ideas, that can be argued and defended. However, isomorphism cannot, at least 
not without committing several logical fallacies, be assumed a priori based 
simply on shared vocabulary, on limited observed resemblances, or on the fact 
that certain people have elected to place them into the same category. 

>>Class struggle is obviously present in NK in the form of the tremendous 
>>oppression inflicted upon the people/prolateraiat in the name of protecting 
>>them from an exploitive would-be class enemies.<<

And how does that make North Korea either a socialist or a communist society? 
If anything, you have just defeated your own argument. Karl Marx never 
advocated oppressing the Lumpenproletariat in the name of protecting them from 
"would-be class enemies." 

>>Here we go again - another battle of definitions!<<

Precision is important.
 
>>Totalitarian 1 (Wikipedia): "A totalitarian régime or state attempts to 
>>*control nearly every aspect* of personal, economic, and political life",<<

That is standard usage - and China is allowing free markets which would differ 
with the definition you provided. The rest of your definitions are comparable 
to the above. 

As I said, China (and Russia) would, today, qualify as authoritarian, not as 
totalitarian.

>>(1) If that's true, matters are even worse - 2 dictatorships instead of one: 
>>(a) the dictatorship of the revolutionary vanguard followed by (b) the 
>>dictatorship of the proletariat followed by an imaginary withering away of 
>>the state. How can anyone take this seriously?<<

The revolutionary (proletarian) vanguard are not, using Marx's definitions, 
"dictators" until they have seized the apparatus of the state. At that point, 
they, minus any members of the bourgeoisie and intelligentsia who may have 
assisted them, constitute a dictatorship of the proletariat (socialism).

>>(2) It's purely a matter of interpretation whether or not the Communist 
>>states reached the dictatorship of the proletariat.<<

I disagree - if we are using Marx's definitions. He was very precise.

>>OK, so let me rephrase that: the vision of a stateless modern industrialized 
>>world/society is sweet but naively idealistic especially in light of the 
>>actual history of Communism.<<

I don't disagree with that. IMO, most of Marx's vision is eminently impractical 
and out of date. That is why there are few "pure" Marxists left (early or late 
Marxists). 

I wrote:
The similarities, IMO, were either a result of oppression (the iron 
curtain) or were mostly linguistic (using the same word to describe North 
Korea and Yugoslavia or Lenin and Stalin).

You replied:
>>The similarities may be linguistic to you, but that doesn't mean the 
>>similarities are not real.<<

I did not say that all the similarities were entirely linguistic.

>>(2) Total oppression is itself one of the similarities that all Communist 
>>states share.<<

"Total oppression" is just words. Do you mean totalitarianism? How was there 
"total oppression" in Yugoslavia? How is there total oppression in modern 
mainland China?

>>That's all very fine, but the fact is that Communism is so inept in its 
>>analysis of reality and its actions that it could not even last a century 
>>either economically or socially.<<

Communism is a term for a variety of social constructions. As social 
constructions, they cannot be "inept." Only people can be inept. 

>>Corporate capitalism certainly has its problems - extremes of wealth 
>>andpoverty - but the basic system is viable. Future economics will be some 
>>form of capitalist economics.<<

The Guardian said that there is nothing preventing some form of capitalism. He 
did not say, as you have, that "[f]uture economics will be some form of 
capitalist economics." And `Abdu'l-Baha was making suggestions in the context 
of early 20th-century capitalism, i.e., how to improve it. He also never 
predicted that capitalism, however constructed, would become the economic 
system of the future.

However, for what it's worth, I have nothing against some small-scale 
capitalism. My problem is with corporate capitalism, which has 

RE: Baha'i Liberation "Theology" ((long quote))

2005-10-13 Thread Ian Kluge
Dear Mark, 


"I didn't say that they did not live in a communist state. I suggested that
there is no such *thing* as a communist state. There are only particular
social constructions (nations) which may have certain observable
similarities. Tito, through his political genius, allowed Yugoslavia
functioned in both the first and second world."

Whether or not there is in your opinion such a 'thing' as a communist state
is not the point. The point is that both Yugoslavs did in fact live in a
communist state - as do North Koreans. Both suffer(ed) oppression based on
and justified by the Marxist and Leninist (and in Korea's case Stalinist)
ideology. 


You write: 

"Where is the class struggle in Kim Il Sung's North Korea? And how did the
so-called revolutions and class struggles in certain nations relate to
Marx's views? You are, IMO, confusing labels with constructions."

Class struggle is obviously present in NK in the form of the tremendous
oppression inflicted upon the people/prolateraiat in the name of protecting
them from an exploitive would-be class enemies. 

You write: 

>>But I did not say all totalitarian states are communist. China is was and
to a large extent still totalitarian e.g. does not recognise the difference
between public and private spheres of existence - which is why it persecutes
people for private opinions. Religious beliefs and keeps close control of
the internet.<<

"That would, as I think would be defined by most political scientists and
political sociologists, qualify it as authoritarian, not totalitarian."

Here we go again - another battle of definitions! 

Totalitarian 1 (Wikipedia): "A totalitarian régime or state attempts to
*control nearly every aspect* of personal, economic, and political life",
i.e. it does not recognise the difference between public and private aspects
of life and exerts control over them. All aspects of life are mobilized in
the entire populations. 

Totalitarian states care about what we think (and feel) *and* want our
obedience; authoritarian states don't care what we think as long as we
outwardly obey. 

Totalitarian 2: A Glossary of Political Economy Terms: (Dr. Paul M Johnson) 

"Domination by a single, like-minded governing elite of all (or virtually
all) organized political, economic, social and cultural activities in a
country [ i.e domination of public and private]  by means of a single-party
monopoly of power, police repression not only of all forms of dissent and
opposition but also of all forms of independent private organizations as
such, rigorous censorship of the mass media, centralized state planning and
administration of the economy, and pervasive propaganda to inculcate the
principles of the obligatory official ideology. Totalitarian states differ
from traditional dictatorships or despotisms primarily with respect to the
broader ("total") scope of human behavior [ public and private] that the
authorities seek to regulate in detail" 

http://66.102.7.104/search?q=cache:0g8WXPdmc3sJ:www.auburn.edu/~johnspm/glos
s/totalitarianism+totalitarianism&hl=en 

Totalitarian 3: "a modern autocratic government in which the state involves
itself in all facets of society, including the daily life of its citizens [
i.e. controls public and private spheres] . A totalitarian government seeks
to control not only all economic and political matters but the attitudes,
values, and beliefs of its population, erasing the distinction between state
and society." [i.e. controls the private] 
Columbia Enclyclopedia 

http://www.bartleby.com/65/to/totalita.html  


You write re dictatorship of the proletariat: 

"No. It is a stage they never reached. In order to have a dictatorship of
the proletariat (socialism), the working class (not some class of
intelligentsia which claims to represent them) needs to be in charge."

(1) If that's true, matters are even worse - 2 dictatorships instead of one:
(a) the dictatorship of the revolutionary vanguard followed by (b) the
dictatorship of the proletariat followed by an imaginary withering away of
the state. How can anyone take this seriously? 

(2) It's purely a matter of interpretation whether or not the Communist
states reached the dictatorship of the proletariat. One can just as well
argue that the proletariat was in charge insofar as its interests guided the
actions of the revolutionary vanguard i.e. the vanguard had no interests of
its own but only those of the proletariat.

You write:   

"That is ad hominem, i.e. attacking the messenger. There are a lot of very
smart people who advocate various interpretations of Bakunin's and Marx's
ideas of communism."

OK, so let me rephrase that: the vision of a stateless modern industrialized
world/society is sweet but naively idealistic especially in light of the
actual history of Communism. 

You write re NK and Yugoslavia: 

"The similarities, IMO, were either a result of oppression (the iron
curtain) or were mostly linguistic (using the same word to describe North
Korea and

RE: Baha'i Liberation "Theology" ((long quote))

2005-10-12 Thread Mark A. Foster
Ian,

At 10:20 PM 10/12/2005, you wrote:
>>In fact, I was not thinking of this passage as you assumed but rather of the 
>>Guardian's quote which makes it quite clear that natural differences among 
>>human beings must form a part of any accurate explanation of social and 
>>economic differences among people. From this it follows that 'corporatocracy' 
>>alone cannot explain these differences.<<

I never said that it could. My point is that most corporate cultures are more 
about holding onto power and wealth than guaranteeing that people are paid 
justly for their work. 

Via moderna, Mark A. Foster . http://markfoster.net
... [a] word is ... a universal. - William of Ockham
Structurization Tech: http://tech.structurization.com 



 
 
The information contained in this e-mail and any attachments thereto ("e-mail") 
is sent by the Johnson County Community College ("JCCC") and is intended to be 
confidential and for the use of only the individual or entity named above. The 
information may be protected by federal and state privacy and disclosures acts 
or other legal rules. If the reader of this message is not the intended 
recipient, you are notified that retention, dissemination, distribution or 
copying of this e-mail is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail 
in error please immediately notify JCCC by email reply and immediately and 
permanently delete this e-mail message and any attachments thereto. Thank you.
 
 
__
 

You are subscribed to Baha'i Studies as: mailto:archive@mail-archive.com
Unsubscribe: send a blank email to mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subscribe: send subscribe bahai-st in the message body to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subscribe: http://list.jccc.edu:8080/read/all_forums/subscribe?name=bahai-st
Baha'i Studies is available through the following:
Mail - mailto:bahai-st@list.jccc.edu
Web - http://list.jccc.edu:8080/read/?forum=bahai-st
News - news://list.jccc.edu/bahai-st
Public - http://www.escribe.com/religion/bahaist
Old Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.net
New Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.edu


RE: Baha'i Liberation "Theology" ((long quote))

2005-10-12 Thread Ian Kluge
Dear Mark, 

You wrote the following in reference to my quote from "Directives from the
Guardian", 20: 

" Where does the Guardian say that? I have never seen any statement which
comes even marginally close to what you wrote. 

I assume, however, that you are thinking of this passage:

"...The Master has definitely stated that wages should be unequal, simply
because that men are unequal in their ability, and hence should receive
wages that would correspond to their varying capacities and resources."
-- From a letter written on behalf of Shoghi Effendi to an individual
believer, December 26, 1935 (Lights of Guidance, p.550)

In fact, I was not thinking of this passage as you assumed but rather of the
Guardian's quote which makes it quite clear that natural differences among
human beings must form a part of any accurate explanation of social and
economic differences among people. From this it follows that
'corporatocracy' alone cannot explain these differences. 

Best wishes,

Ian Kluge  

 

Best wishes, 

Ian Kluge 


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mark A. Foster
Sent: October 12, 2005 7:43 PM
To: Baha'i Studies
Subject: RE: Baha'i Liberation "Theology" ((long quote))

Ian,

At 09:22 PM 10/12/2005, you wrote:
>>Unfortunately you assume incorrectly.<<

What did I assume incorrectly? 

>>The quote  ( did not write it) is from Shoghi Effendi, "Directives from
the Guardian" 20.<<

Yes, but that is the passage I quoted in my last message to you! I did not
cite the reference from Paris Talks, since most of the material in that book
has not been authenticated.

You cite a number of passages which say that wages should be unequal. That
is true. However, where did I ever say that the position taken by
`Abdu'l-Baha and Shoghi Effendi was something else? As Baha'is, we believe
in the elimination of the extremes of poverty and wealth, not in the
elimination of all wage and salary differences.

Perhaps it might help if you would tell me what you believe to be my
position. It does not appear that you understand it.

Via moderna, Mark A. Foster . http://markfoster.net
... [a] word is ... a universal. - William of Ockham
Structurization Tech: http://tech.structurization.com 



 
 
The information contained in this e-mail and any attachments thereto
("e-mail") is sent by the Johnson County Community College ("JCCC") and is
intended to be confidential and for the use of only the individual or entity
named above. The information may be protected by federal and state privacy
and disclosures acts or other legal rules. If the reader of this message is
not the intended recipient, you are notified that retention, dissemination,
distribution or copying of this e-mail is strictly prohibited. If you have
received this e-mail in error please immediately notify JCCC by email reply
and immediately and permanently delete this e-mail message and any
attachments thereto. Thank you.
 
 
__
 

You are subscribed to Baha'i Studies as: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe: send a blank email to
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subscribe: send subscribe bahai-st in the message body to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subscribe: http://list.jccc.edu:8080/read/all_forums/subscribe?name=bahai-st
Baha'i Studies is available through the following:
Mail - mailto:bahai-st@list.jccc.edu
Web - http://list.jccc.edu:8080/read/?forum=bahai-st
News - news://list.jccc.edu/bahai-st
Public - http://www.escribe.com/religion/bahaist
Old Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.net
New Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.edu




__
You are subscribed to Baha'i Studies as: mailto:archive@mail-archive.com
Unsubscribe: send a blank email to mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subscribe: send subscribe bahai-st in the message body to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subscribe: http://list.jccc.edu:8080/read/all_forums/subscribe?name=bahai-st
Baha'i Studies is available through the following:
Mail - mailto:bahai-st@list.jccc.edu
Web - http://list.jccc.edu:8080/read/?forum=bahai-st
News - news://list.jccc.edu/bahai-st
Public - http://www.escribe.com/religion/bahaist
Old Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.net
New Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.edu


RE: Baha'i Liberation "Theology" ((long quote))

2005-10-12 Thread Mark A. Foster
Ian,

At 09:22 PM 10/12/2005, you wrote:
>>Unfortunately you assume incorrectly.<<

What did I assume incorrectly? 

>>The quote  ( did not write it) is from Shoghi Effendi, "Directives from the 
>>Guardian" 20.<<

Yes, but that is the passage I quoted in my last message to you! I did not cite 
the reference from Paris Talks, since most of the material in that book has not 
been authenticated.

You cite a number of passages which say that wages should be unequal. That is 
true. However, where did I ever say that the position taken by `Abdu'l-Baha and 
Shoghi Effendi was something else? As Baha'is, we believe in the elimination of 
the extremes of poverty and wealth, not in the elimination of all wage and 
salary differences.

Perhaps it might help if you would tell me what you believe to be my position. 
It does not appear that you understand it.

Via moderna, Mark A. Foster . http://markfoster.net
... [a] word is ... a universal. - William of Ockham
Structurization Tech: http://tech.structurization.com 



 
 
The information contained in this e-mail and any attachments thereto ("e-mail") 
is sent by the Johnson County Community College ("JCCC") and is intended to be 
confidential and for the use of only the individual or entity named above. The 
information may be protected by federal and state privacy and disclosures acts 
or other legal rules. If the reader of this message is not the intended 
recipient, you are notified that retention, dissemination, distribution or 
copying of this e-mail is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail 
in error please immediately notify JCCC by email reply and immediately and 
permanently delete this e-mail message and any attachments thereto. Thank you.
 
 
__
 

You are subscribed to Baha'i Studies as: mailto:archive@mail-archive.com
Unsubscribe: send a blank email to mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subscribe: send subscribe bahai-st in the message body to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subscribe: http://list.jccc.edu:8080/read/all_forums/subscribe?name=bahai-st
Baha'i Studies is available through the following:
Mail - mailto:bahai-st@list.jccc.edu
Web - http://list.jccc.edu:8080/read/?forum=bahai-st
News - news://list.jccc.edu/bahai-st
Public - http://www.escribe.com/religion/bahaist
Old Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.net
New Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.edu


RE: Baha'i Liberation "Theology" ((long quote))

2005-10-12 Thread Ian Kluge
Dear Mark, 

Unfortunately you assume incorrectly. 

The quote  ( did not write it) is from Shoghi Effendi, "Directives from the
Guardian" 20.

See also Ocean: Social Inequality

"... Social inequality is the inevitable outcome of the natural inequality
of men. Human beings are different in ability and should, therefore, be
different in their social and economic standing. Extremes of wealth and
poverty should, however, be totally abolished. Those whose brains have
contributed to the creation and improvement of the means of production must
be fairly rewarded, though these means may be owned and controlled by
others."

(From a letter written on behalf of Shoghi Effendi to an individual
believer, January 26, 1935)

1866. "Equality is a Chimera!"

"Equality is a chimera! It is entirely impracticable! Even if equality could
be achieved it could not continue -- and if its existence were possible, the
whole order of the world be destroyed. The law of order must always obtain
in the world of humanity. Heaven has so decreed in the world of humanity.
Heaven has so decreed in the creation of man."

('Abdu'l-Bahá: Paris Talks, p. 132, London, 1961 ed.)  550 

(Compilations, Lights of Guidance, p. 549)

"...The Master has definitely stated that wages should be unequal, simply
because that men are unequal in their ability, and hence should receive
wages that would correspond to their varying capacities and resources. This
view seems to contradict the opinion of some modern economists. But the
friends should have full confidence in the words of the Master, and should
give preference to His statements over those voiced by our so-called modern
thinkers."

(From a letter written on behalf of Shoghi Effendi to an individual
believer, December 26, 1935)

(Compilations, Lights of Guidance, p. 549)


Best wishes, 

Ian Kluge 






 
 
The information contained in this e-mail and any attachments thereto ("e-mail") 
is sent by the Johnson County Community College ("JCCC") and is intended to be 
confidential and for the use of only the individual or entity named above. The 
information may be protected by federal and state privacy and disclosures acts 
or other legal rules. If the reader of this message is not the intended 
recipient, you are notified that retention, dissemination, distribution or 
copying of this e-mail is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail 
in error please immediately notify JCCC by email reply and immediately and 
permanently delete this e-mail message and any attachments thereto. Thank you.
 
 
__
 

You are subscribed to Baha'i Studies as: mailto:archive@mail-archive.com
Unsubscribe: send a blank email to mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subscribe: send subscribe bahai-st in the message body to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subscribe: http://list.jccc.edu:8080/read/all_forums/subscribe?name=bahai-st
Baha'i Studies is available through the following:
Mail - mailto:bahai-st@list.jccc.edu
Web - http://list.jccc.edu:8080/read/?forum=bahai-st
News - news://list.jccc.edu/bahai-st
Public - http://www.escribe.com/religion/bahaist
Old Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.net
New Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.edu


RE: Baha'i Liberation "Theology" ((long quote))

2005-10-12 Thread Mark A. Foster
Ian,

At 11:30 AM 10/12/2005, you wrote:
>>My point is not so much eliminating (or not) social inequality but to show 
>>that by the Guardian's analysis, all social and economic inequalities are not 
>>necessarily man-made injustice but simply a reflection of individual 
>>differences in human nature.<<

Where does the Guardian say that? I have never seen any statement which comes 
even marginally close to what you wrote. 

I assume, however, that you are thinking of this passage:

"...The Master has definitely stated that wages should be unequal, simply 
because that men are unequal in their ability, and hence should receive wages 
that would correspond to their varying capacities and resources."
-- From a letter written on behalf of Shoghi Effendi to an individual believer, 
December 26, 1935 (Lights of Guidance, p.550)

He is making a statement of principle, not claiming that all the social 
inequalities we see around us are just. There is a difference between paying 
people with consideration to their abilities and paying people because of their 
race, ethnicity, class, or gender.

>>IOW, blaming what you call 'corporatocracy' may often be a false analysis of 
>>an economically or socially unjust situation.<<

The corporatocracy, as generally constructed, promotes inequality on the basis 
of power, wealth, and privilege. I don't see how one can justify such a monster 
from the Baha'i sources.

Via moderna, Mark A. Foster . http://markfoster.net
... [a] word is ... a universal. - William of Ockham
Structurization Tech: http://tech.structurization.com 



 
 
The information contained in this e-mail and any attachments thereto ("e-mail") 
is sent by the Johnson County Community College ("JCCC") and is intended to be 
confidential and for the use of only the individual or entity named above. The 
information may be protected by federal and state privacy and disclosures acts 
or other legal rules. If the reader of this message is not the intended 
recipient, you are notified that retention, dissemination, distribution or 
copying of this e-mail is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail 
in error please immediately notify JCCC by email reply and immediately and 
permanently delete this e-mail message and any attachments thereto. Thank you.
 
 
__
 

You are subscribed to Baha'i Studies as: mailto:archive@mail-archive.com
Unsubscribe: send a blank email to mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subscribe: send subscribe bahai-st in the message body to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subscribe: http://list.jccc.edu:8080/read/all_forums/subscribe?name=bahai-st
Baha'i Studies is available through the following:
Mail - mailto:bahai-st@list.jccc.edu
Web - http://list.jccc.edu:8080/read/?forum=bahai-st
News - news://list.jccc.edu/bahai-st
Public - http://www.escribe.com/religion/bahaist
Old Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.net
New Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.edu


RE: Baha'i Liberation "Theology" ((long quote))

2005-10-12 Thread Ian Kluge
Dear Mark, 

My point is not so much eliminating (or not) social inequality but to show
that by the Guardian's analysis, all social and economic inequalities are
not necessarily man-made injustice but simply a reflection of individual
differences in human nature.

IOW, blaming what you call 'corporatocracy' may often be a false analysis of
an economically or socially unjust situation. 

Best wishes,

Ian Kluge 



-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mark A. Foster
Sent: October 10, 2005 7:08 AM
To: Baha'i Studies
Subject: RE: Baha'i Liberation "Theology" ((long quote))

Ian,

At 06:59 PM 10/8/2005, you wrote:
>>Here's an interesting quote to consider amidst all this corporation
bashing:
>>"Social inequality is the inevitable outcome of the natural inequality of
man. Human beings are different in ability and should, therefore, be
different in their social and economic standing. Extremes of wealth and
poverty should, however, be abolished...
>>-- Shoghi Effendi, Directives from the Guardian" 20 

As a Baha'i, I have no interest in eliminating social inequality. The
socialism in the Baha'i texts (e.g., houses of finance) does, however,
appear to be structured to eliminate the sort of social inequity which is
promoted by the corporatocracy.

Via moderna, Mark A. Foster . http://markfoster.net
... [a] word is ... a universal. - William of Ockham
Structurization Tech: http://tech.structurization.com 



 
 
The information contained in this e-mail and any attachments thereto
("e-mail") is sent by the Johnson County Community College ("JCCC") and is
intended to be confidential and for the use of only the individual or entity
named above. The information may be protected by federal and state privacy
and disclosures acts or other legal rules. If the reader of this message is
not the intended recipient, you are notified that retention, dissemination,
distribution or copying of this e-mail is strictly prohibited. If you have
received this e-mail in error please immediately notify JCCC by email reply
and immediately and permanently delete this e-mail message and any
attachments thereto. Thank you.
 
 
__
 

You are subscribed to Baha'i Studies as: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe: send a blank email to
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subscribe: send subscribe bahai-st in the message body to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subscribe: http://list.jccc.edu:8080/read/all_forums/subscribe?name=bahai-st
Baha'i Studies is available through the following:
Mail - mailto:bahai-st@list.jccc.edu
Web - http://list.jccc.edu:8080/read/?forum=bahai-st
News - news://list.jccc.edu/bahai-st
Public - http://www.escribe.com/religion/bahaist
Old Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.net
New Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.edu




__
You are subscribed to Baha'i Studies as: mailto:archive@mail-archive.com
Unsubscribe: send a blank email to mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subscribe: send subscribe bahai-st in the message body to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subscribe: http://list.jccc.edu:8080/read/all_forums/subscribe?name=bahai-st
Baha'i Studies is available through the following:
Mail - mailto:bahai-st@list.jccc.edu
Web - http://list.jccc.edu:8080/read/?forum=bahai-st
News - news://list.jccc.edu/bahai-st
Public - http://www.escribe.com/religion/bahaist
Old Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.net
New Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.edu


Re: Baha'i Liberation "Theology" ((long quote))

2005-10-11 Thread Mark A. Foster
Firestorm,

At 02:04 AM 10/9/2005, you wrote:
>>now, i can say i am saying "as a Baha'i" i think usa coproations should be 
>>let lose to dismember anything resembling national idenityt and interest...or 
>>i can say, i am a member of the Baha'i Faith and as a person involved in 
>>branding and formations i kinda enjoy the world view ex[ressed in the story 
>>"rollerball" as a wonderful future in which the proletariat rule by benefit 
>>of their ension checks as part of the path to be travelled to true social 
>>justice.<< 

As a *Baha'i*, I have no problem with national identity and interest. However, 
as a Marxist sociologist, I do have a problem with hegemony and neocolonialism 
(whether carried on in the name of universal democratization or something 
else). 

If a country needs a commodity, such as oil, to "fuel" (pardon the pun) its 
economy, and it must, therefore, overthrow other governments in order to obtain 
that commodity, I would, honestly, rather see that country fall into economic 
ruin than continue on such a path

>>marx and smith, to my dim recall, use relatively similar math in describing 
>>the process of getting there.<<

As I see it, the so-called terrorists (whom I would call "counterterrorists" 
responding to Western terrorism or imperialism), such as members of the largely 
fictive al-Qa'ida, have taken on a similar function to the proletarians Marx 
anticipated in a socialist revolution. That does not mean I support what these 
Islamists are doing (I definitely do not), but I think I understand, at least 
from my revisionist Marxist perspective, their role in the present global 
system.

Via moderna, Mark A. Foster . http://markfoster.net
... [a] word is ... a universal. - William of Ockham
Structurization Tech: http://tech.structurization.com 



 
 
The information contained in this e-mail and any attachments thereto ("e-mail") 
is sent by the Johnson County Community College ("JCCC") and is intended to be 
confidential and for the use of only the individual or entity named above. The 
information may be protected by federal and state privacy and disclosures acts 
or other legal rules. If the reader of this message is not the intended 
recipient, you are notified that retention, dissemination, distribution or 
copying of this e-mail is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail 
in error please immediately notify JCCC by email reply and immediately and 
permanently delete this e-mail message and any attachments thereto. Thank you.
 
 
__
 

You are subscribed to Baha'i Studies as: mailto:archive@mail-archive.com
Unsubscribe: send a blank email to mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subscribe: send subscribe bahai-st in the message body to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subscribe: http://list.jccc.edu:8080/read/all_forums/subscribe?name=bahai-st
Baha'i Studies is available through the following:
Mail - mailto:bahai-st@list.jccc.edu
Web - http://list.jccc.edu:8080/read/?forum=bahai-st
News - news://list.jccc.edu/bahai-st
Public - http://www.escribe.com/religion/bahaist
Old Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.net
New Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.edu


RE: Baha'i Liberation "Theology" ((long quote))

2005-10-10 Thread Mark A. Foster
Ian,

At 06:59 PM 10/8/2005, you wrote:
>>Here's an interesting quote to consider amidst all this corporation bashing:
>>"Social inequality is the inevitable outcome of the natural inequality of 
>>man. Human beings are different in ability and should, therefore, be 
>>different in their social and economic standing. Extremes of wealth and 
>>poverty should, however, be abolished...
>>-- Shoghi Effendi, Directives from the Guardian" 20 

As a Baha'i, I have no interest in eliminating social inequality. The socialism 
in the Baha'i texts (e.g., houses of finance) does, however, appear to be 
structured to eliminate the sort of social inequity which is promoted by the 
corporatocracy.

Via moderna, Mark A. Foster . http://markfoster.net
... [a] word is ... a universal. - William of Ockham
Structurization Tech: http://tech.structurization.com 



 
 
The information contained in this e-mail and any attachments thereto ("e-mail") 
is sent by the Johnson County Community College ("JCCC") and is intended to be 
confidential and for the use of only the individual or entity named above. The 
information may be protected by federal and state privacy and disclosures acts 
or other legal rules. If the reader of this message is not the intended 
recipient, you are notified that retention, dissemination, distribution or 
copying of this e-mail is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail 
in error please immediately notify JCCC by email reply and immediately and 
permanently delete this e-mail message and any attachments thereto. Thank you.
 
 
__
 

You are subscribed to Baha'i Studies as: mailto:archive@mail-archive.com
Unsubscribe: send a blank email to mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subscribe: send subscribe bahai-st in the message body to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subscribe: http://list.jccc.edu:8080/read/all_forums/subscribe?name=bahai-st
Baha'i Studies is available through the following:
Mail - mailto:bahai-st@list.jccc.edu
Web - http://list.jccc.edu:8080/read/?forum=bahai-st
News - news://list.jccc.edu/bahai-st
Public - http://www.escribe.com/religion/bahaist
Old Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.net
New Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.edu


RE: Baha'i Liberation "Theology" ((long quote))

2005-10-10 Thread Mark A. Foster
Ian,

Sorry for the delay, but I wanted to make sure I had enough time to respond to 
your message.

At 03:53 PM 10/6/2005, you wrote:
>>I know *a lot* of Serbs and Croatians and they would be stunned by your 
>>statement that they did not live in a Communist state. So would Milvan Djilas 
>>(author of the explosive "The New Class: An Analysis of the  Communist" 
>>System [1957])His insider's book was especially focussed on Yugoslavia as a 
>>Communist state.<<

I didn't say that they did not live in a communist state. I suggested that 
there is no such *thing* as a communist state. There are only particular social 
constructions (nations) which may have certain observable similarities. Tito, 
through his political genius, allowed Yugoslavia functioned in both the first 
and second world. 

>>Both Tito's Yugoslavia and Sung's North Korea were run on strict 
>>Marxist/Communist dogma: class struggle, Party as vanguard, historical and 
>>dialectical materialism etc.<<

Where is the class struggle in Kim Il Sung's North Korea? And how did the 
so-called revolutions and class struggles in certain nations relate to Marx's 
views? You are, IMO, confusing labels with constructions.

>>But I did not say all totalitarian states are communist. China is was and to 
>>a large extent still totalitarian e.g. does not recognise the difference 
>>between public and private spheres of existence - which is why it persecutes 
>>people for private opinions. Religious beliefs and keeps close control of the 
>>internet.<<

That would, as I think would be defined by most political scientists and 
political sociologists, qualify it as authoritarian, not totalitarian.

>>But first they advocated dictatorship of the proletariat - a phase no 
>>Communist country has ever gotten beyond. The fact is there has never been a 
>>Communist state which has not also been totalitarian. They are correlates.<<

No. It is a stage they never reached. In order to have a dictatorship of the 
proletariat (socialism), the working class (not some class of intelligentsia 
which claims to represent them) needs to be in charge.

>>And, as I've said before, what person - then or now - with a lick of people 
>>smarts would ever take the vision of a stateless modern society seriously? 
>>That was just honey for flies.<<

That is ad hominem, i.e. attacking the messenger. There are a lot of very smart 
people who advocate various interpretations of Bakunin's and Marx's ideas of 
communism. 

>>People lived under a particular governments whose policies were guided by the 
>>work of Marx, Lenin, Stalin etc. Those ideas and works shared a certain 
>>number of similarities labelled 'Communism.' It could have labelled XYZ but 
>>the similarities remain.<<

The similarities, IMO, were either a result of oppression (the iron curtain) or 
were mostly linguistic (using the same word to describe North Korea and 
Yugoslavia or Lenin and Stalin).

>>What's important however  - and the key issue in this discussion -  is the 
>>fact that the Chinese leadership has recognised that a modern industrialized 
>>society cannot be built on Marxist/Communist principles.<<

I don't believe that a modern industrial society, on the foundations of 
corporate capitalism, should be built at *all*. Actually, I would like to see 
it almost completely dismantled (in spite of the suffering which would result). 
I have no desire to see future generations grow up under the ideologies 
supporting corporate and political greed.

>>Really? He was 'only' the leader of the world's most powerful Communist state 
>>for 18 years. That's 25% of the span of Communist rule in Russia. I would 
>>think his words and deeds *very* relevant.<<

Not to Trotsky. 

>>We have more than Trotsky's words - we have his actions and there is nothing 
>>in his actions to suggest he would have become anything than their heir of 
>>Lenin vis-à-vis his reliance on terror and force. Trotsky/Stalin? Six of one, 
>>half-a-dozen of the other.<<

Trotsky was not in charge, and it is entirely speculative to comment on the 
kind of government which might have developed if he ever did hold the reins of 
power. 

>>I see we could have a real debate about the nature of perspectivism.<<

I adopted what I call perspectivism when I was in graduate school. It is 
incorporated into my Ph.D. dissertation on pentecostalism. I have no idea how 
to debate the subject without getting back into the realism-nominalism 
discussion, which I am not anxious to do. 

Until about 10 years ago, my perspectivism was a bit essentialistic, i.e., 
different perspectives on real essences. However, functionally, my views were 
not so different from what they are right now.

>>BTW, this still doesn't make it clear why you dragged Trotsky into the 
>>conversation.<<

Because Trotksy, IMO, was among the finest fruits produced by the communist 
movement, and we were discussing communism and Marxism.

>>Not at all. I don't switch hats/perspectives/viewpoints an

Re: Baha'i Liberation "Theology" ((long quote))

2005-10-09 Thread firestorm
brent,
 i would add another characterisitic to the qualities of the quasi-person of a 
corporation...most of the time it doesn;t stop in the middle of a sentence 
distracted by a secretary's blouse, caffeine or nictoine deficiencies, etc.
 it has that glorious (and i may be being subtly inflammatory here for my own 
amusement) blake-like tyger,tyger burning bright, >purpose< that is inherent in 
it essence, beautiful to behold.
   how many human beings fully can say what they are on and want to be and how 
they go about it on one page?
 and yet the average coproration can, with a good enuff corp lawyer.
 i have shopped in the ben franklin where sam walton concevied wal-mart (which 
is, significantly enuff to me, about 10 minutes if u know the backroads from 
where the bowie knife was forged). and i know the opverty in that town then, 
and now. it is declining, in real terms, even whie the statisticians claim it's 
increasining by measuring with relatives rather than absolutes.
   yes, indeed, if ur in the usa and u hope to have any measure of paper wealth 
and are not the sole owner of a business, u are a corporate owner.
   a few months ago i was in a town where a group of rather poor people were 
waginmg a public relations war against a rather large corporation over payment 
for ag workers. i was talking to people on picket lines, telling them how to 
tune their msg. i was trying to get interviews on camera with leaders of this 
movement, and told them (which in retrospect i nevvver should have done, it's 
still life's illusions i recall) that it was my intent to also interview the 
corp middle managers trying to get their own kids thru college by getting that 
extra penny on the bottom line. that  the overall goal was to demonstrate that 
the corporation was trying to get good returns to give good pensions to the 
teachers who were wanting a good retirement becuase they were burnt out from 
teaching the kids of the peole who picked the crops.  ..that there is no 
>them<. this msg was rejected by the picketers and their handlers and bosses. 
i'm going to tune it and work on massaging my way into presenting it to the 
coproation next. 
  i offer these little concrete stories since, imho, without such, talk of 
social justice etc is words. 
  

   

 
 
The information contained in this e-mail and any attachments thereto ("e-mail") 
is sent by the Johnson County Community College ("JCCC") and is intended to be 
confidential and for the use of only the individual or entity named above. The 
information may be protected by federal and state privacy and disclosures acts 
or other legal rules. If the reader of this message is not the intended 
recipient, you are notified that retention, dissemination, distribution or 
copying of this e-mail is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail 
in error please immediately notify JCCC by email reply and immediately and 
permanently delete this e-mail message and any attachments thereto. Thank you.
 
 
__
 

You are subscribed to Baha'i Studies as: mailto:archive@mail-archive.com
Unsubscribe: send a blank email to mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subscribe: send subscribe bahai-st in the message body to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subscribe: http://list.jccc.edu:8080/read/all_forums/subscribe?name=bahai-st
Baha'i Studies is available through the following:
Mail - mailto:bahai-st@list.jccc.edu
Web - http://list.jccc.edu:8080/read/?forum=bahai-st
News - news://list.jccc.edu/bahai-st
Public - http://www.escribe.com/religion/bahaist
Old Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.net
New Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.edu


Re: Baha'i Liberation "Theology" ((long quote))

2005-10-09 Thread firestorm
markfoster,
 first, imho, yeah. totallly. the Baha'i Faith has a clear realisation of the 
state of the world at any moment. it's inherent, imho, in there being a Baha'i 
Faith. 
when i read a doc like centiry of light, or one common Faith, imho i am seeing 
a statement about the realisation. such comments are however framed far above 
the dialectic persiflage that usually passes for analytical discourse.
  now, i can say i am saying "as a Baha'i" i think usa coproations should be 
let lose to dismember anything resembling national idenityt and interest...or i 
can say, i am a member of the Baha'i Faith and as a person involved in branding 
and formations i kinda enjoy the world view ex[ressed in the story "rollerball" 
as a wonderful future in which the proletariat rule by benefit of their ension 
checks as part of the path to be travelled to true social justice. marx and 
smith, to my dim recall, use relatively similar math in describing the process 
of getting there.
 this does not make my being a draconian upholder of "brand identity as profit, 
profit is noble" philosophy a "Baha'i economic philosphy", but rather the 
economic philosophy of someone trying to become a Baha'i in some deeper sense 
of the word. 
  when the UHJ or the beloved Guardia describes the process of getting to 
social justice, and what is the definition of social justice, then it is, imho 
the Baha'i view of the process.
  

 
 
The information contained in this e-mail and any attachments thereto ("e-mail") 
is sent by the Johnson County Community College ("JCCC") and is intended to be 
confidential and for the use of only the individual or entity named above. The 
information may be protected by federal and state privacy and disclosures acts 
or other legal rules. If the reader of this message is not the intended 
recipient, you are notified that retention, dissemination, distribution or 
copying of this e-mail is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail 
in error please immediately notify JCCC by email reply and immediately and 
permanently delete this e-mail message and any attachments thereto. Thank you.
 
 
__
 

You are subscribed to Baha'i Studies as: mailto:archive@mail-archive.com
Unsubscribe: send a blank email to mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subscribe: send subscribe bahai-st in the message body to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subscribe: http://list.jccc.edu:8080/read/all_forums/subscribe?name=bahai-st
Baha'i Studies is available through the following:
Mail - mailto:bahai-st@list.jccc.edu
Web - http://list.jccc.edu:8080/read/?forum=bahai-st
News - news://list.jccc.edu/bahai-st
Public - http://www.escribe.com/religion/bahaist
Old Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.net
New Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.edu


Re: Baha'i Liberation "Theology" ((long quote))

2005-10-08 Thread Mark A. Foster
Brent,

At 08:29 PM 10/8/2005, you wrote:
>>Do you have any life insurance with a cash value?  The insurance company has 
>>invested in the stock market; that's why the value grows.<<

Sure, and my taxes have gone to support some large corporations, too. 

I am not claiming to separate myself from the system. That would be impossible. 
I shop in Target and Best Buy, watch the SciFi Channel which is has large 
corporate sponsors (commercials), etc. I want to see the system transformed.

I am also not criticizing all individual corporations. Some are more humane 
than others. I am criticizing the system of corporate power - the 
corporatocracy.

Via moderna, Mark A. Foster . http://markfoster.net
... [a] word is ... a universal. - William of Ockham
Structurization Tech: http://tech.structurization.com 



 
 
The information contained in this e-mail and any attachments thereto ("e-mail") 
is sent by the Johnson County Community College ("JCCC") and is intended to be 
confidential and for the use of only the individual or entity named above. The 
information may be protected by federal and state privacy and disclosures acts 
or other legal rules. If the reader of this message is not the intended 
recipient, you are notified that retention, dissemination, distribution or 
copying of this e-mail is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail 
in error please immediately notify JCCC by email reply and immediately and 
permanently delete this e-mail message and any attachments thereto. Thank you.
 
 
__
 

You are subscribed to Baha'i Studies as: mailto:archive@mail-archive.com
Unsubscribe: send a blank email to mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subscribe: send subscribe bahai-st in the message body to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subscribe: http://list.jccc.edu:8080/read/all_forums/subscribe?name=bahai-st
Baha'i Studies is available through the following:
Mail - mailto:bahai-st@list.jccc.edu
Web - http://list.jccc.edu:8080/read/?forum=bahai-st
News - news://list.jccc.edu/bahai-st
Public - http://www.escribe.com/religion/bahaist
Old Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.net
New Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.edu


Re: Baha'i Liberation "Theology" ((long quote))

2005-10-08 Thread Brent Poirier
"I am referring to the American corporatocracy and the corporations which make 
it up."

In my opinion, "corporation" is a buzz-word that creates a response of "evil" 
in the views of some.  I would like to address that.

As a lawyer, I have often created corporations for clients.  The process is a 
simple one.  A statement of purpose (importing woven hats from Guatemala), a 
statement of the number of years duration, a statement of where it will 
function -- these and a few other provisions result in the issuance of a 
"corporate charter".  This is a one-page legal document that says that the 
state has created a legal person.  That is, a fictional person; actually, 
people still operate it, but on paper this entity exists.

The people who form the corporation then transfer assets into it: They create a 
bank account in the name of the corporation, and put money in it.  They 
transfer title of cars to the corporation.  In return they receive "share 
certificates" that prove their participation as owners.

It is a benign process.  It is as good, or as harmful a company, as the people 
who run it; no more and no less. The people running it are exactly as they were 
before they signed these documents, for better or for worse. 

And:

The people's activities are no more evil than before, merely because they are 
now a "corporation."  But to some, the devil is a corporation.  Once you are 
pasted with this term, you are by definition an evil entity.

So that's a small corporation; the same is true for large ones.  The people in 
them operate them.  The thing is that when people talk about how corporations 
do this and that, who are they talking about?  Very often, they are talking 
about themselves.

Do you own any stock?  

Do you have any life insurance with a cash value?  The insurance company has 
invested in the stock market; that's why the value grows.

Do you have a pension with your employer?  It is invested in the stock market.

Do you have a mutual fund?  Same thing.

The point is:  YOU are the owner of America's corporations, if you participate 
in any of these ways in the economy.  And frankly, the attitude of damning the 
corporations seems to me a very shallow approach to the good and to the harm 
done by America.  The fact that a given organization is a "corporation" means 
exactly nothing to me, as far as whether it's good or bad.  I don't judge a 
book by its cover, nor a business by its name or formation type.

A corporation is just people.

Brent


 
 
The information contained in this e-mail and any attachments thereto ("e-mail") 
is sent by the Johnson County Community College ("JCCC") and is intended to be 
confidential and for the use of only the individual or entity named above. The 
information may be protected by federal and state privacy and disclosures acts 
or other legal rules. If the reader of this message is not the intended 
recipient, you are notified that retention, dissemination, distribution or 
copying of this e-mail is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail 
in error please immediately notify JCCC by email reply and immediately and 
permanently delete this e-mail message and any attachments thereto. Thank you.
 
 
__
 

You are subscribed to Baha'i Studies as: mailto:archive@mail-archive.com
Unsubscribe: send a blank email to mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subscribe: send subscribe bahai-st in the message body to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subscribe: http://list.jccc.edu:8080/read/all_forums/subscribe?name=bahai-st
Baha'i Studies is available through the following:
Mail - mailto:bahai-st@list.jccc.edu
Web - http://list.jccc.edu:8080/read/?forum=bahai-st
News - news://list.jccc.edu/bahai-st
Public - http://www.escribe.com/religion/bahaist
Old Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.net
New Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.edu


RE: Baha'i Liberation "Theology" ((long quote))

2005-10-08 Thread Ian Kluge
Here's an interesting quote to consider amidst all this corporation bashing:

"Social inequality is the inevitable outcome of the natural inequality of
man. Human beings are different in ability and should, therefore, be
different in their social and economic standing. Extremes of wealth and
poverty should, however, be abolished...


-- Shoghi Effendi, Directives from the Guardian" 20

Best wishes,

Ian Kluge 

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mark A. Foster
Sent: October 8, 2005 6:35 AM
To: Baha'i Studies
Subject: Re: Baha'i Liberation "Theology" ((long quote))

Firestorm,

At 01:39 AM 10/8/2005, you wrote:
>>so long as they do not mistake their passions for understandings of the
Faith's view of the state of the world.<< 

Does the Baha'i Faith have an "understanding" of the state of the world?

Via moderna, Mark A. Foster . http://markfoster.net
... [a] word is ... a universal. - William of Ockham
Structurization Tech: http://tech.structurization.com 



 
 
The information contained in this e-mail and any attachments thereto
("e-mail") is sent by the Johnson County Community College ("JCCC") and is
intended to be confidential and for the use of only the individual or entity
named above. The information may be protected by federal and state privacy
and disclosures acts or other legal rules. If the reader of this message is
not the intended recipient, you are notified that retention, dissemination,
distribution or copying of this e-mail is strictly prohibited. If you have
received this e-mail in error please immediately notify JCCC by email reply
and immediately and permanently delete this e-mail message and any
attachments thereto. Thank you.
 
 
__
 

You are subscribed to Baha'i Studies as: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe: send a blank email to
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subscribe: send subscribe bahai-st in the message body to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subscribe: http://list.jccc.edu:8080/read/all_forums/subscribe?name=bahai-st
Baha'i Studies is available through the following:
Mail - mailto:bahai-st@list.jccc.edu
Web - http://list.jccc.edu:8080/read/?forum=bahai-st
News - news://list.jccc.edu/bahai-st
Public - http://www.escribe.com/religion/bahaist
Old Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.net
New Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.edu




__
You are subscribed to Baha'i Studies as: mailto:archive@mail-archive.com
Unsubscribe: send a blank email to mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subscribe: send subscribe bahai-st in the message body to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subscribe: http://list.jccc.edu:8080/read/all_forums/subscribe?name=bahai-st
Baha'i Studies is available through the following:
Mail - mailto:bahai-st@list.jccc.edu
Web - http://list.jccc.edu:8080/read/?forum=bahai-st
News - news://list.jccc.edu/bahai-st
Public - http://www.escribe.com/religion/bahaist
Old Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.net
New Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.edu


Re: Baha'i Liberation "Theology" ((long quote))

2005-10-08 Thread Mark A. Foster
Firestorm,

At 01:39 AM 10/8/2005, you wrote:
>>so long as they do not mistake their passions for understandings of the 
>>Faith's view of the state of the world.<< 

Does the Baha'i Faith have an "understanding" of the state of the world?

Via moderna, Mark A. Foster . http://markfoster.net
... [a] word is ... a universal. - William of Ockham
Structurization Tech: http://tech.structurization.com 



 
 
The information contained in this e-mail and any attachments thereto ("e-mail") 
is sent by the Johnson County Community College ("JCCC") and is intended to be 
confidential and for the use of only the individual or entity named above. The 
information may be protected by federal and state privacy and disclosures acts 
or other legal rules. If the reader of this message is not the intended 
recipient, you are notified that retention, dissemination, distribution or 
copying of this e-mail is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail 
in error please immediately notify JCCC by email reply and immediately and 
permanently delete this e-mail message and any attachments thereto. Thank you.
 
 
__
 

You are subscribed to Baha'i Studies as: mailto:archive@mail-archive.com
Unsubscribe: send a blank email to mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subscribe: send subscribe bahai-st in the message body to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subscribe: http://list.jccc.edu:8080/read/all_forums/subscribe?name=bahai-st
Baha'i Studies is available through the following:
Mail - mailto:bahai-st@list.jccc.edu
Web - http://list.jccc.edu:8080/read/?forum=bahai-st
News - news://list.jccc.edu/bahai-st
Public - http://www.escribe.com/religion/bahaist
Old Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.net
New Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.edu


Re: Baha'i Liberation "Theology" ((long quote))

2005-10-07 Thread firestorm
as somebody who is by trade a pirate, who worked for chavez's people in chicago 
at the same time committing various felonies against local 710 of the 
teamsters, and committing felony assault on an afl/cio union guard in the 
rpesece of chicago police, who turned and shurgged on the basis that whatever 
was ghoing on with the guy after the other guy with a foot long knife it as 
obviously union business, and therefore none of the city's i look at this 
conversation about trotsky/nafta/child labour with a certain"ok i bet all u 
people work for the state in acadaemia or something" kind of incredulity.
  there are, imho 2 kinds of revolutions, the meat and the heart. the one is 
done by using the muzzle of a gun for verbiage.
  the other by slow transformation.  i just got thru interviewing a half dozen 
people who were in dc last week to get their fair share of abuse (mick jagger) 
and not >one< of them could give me a coherent reason to have gone, beyond 
purchasing with their time and money the sense of having "been there for 
soemthing" --and 66% agreed that woodstcok would have been more value for the 
time/money.
 i would offer that transnational corporations are part of the solution to a 
deified nationalism. i would offer that the transnational which empowers a 
father to sell his child to a show factory rather than a brothel is empowering 
the child. i would ofer, concretely, that one of the world's largest 
coporations  had for years a baord advisory member, a lawyer, child ac tivist 
and proclaimer of the  eed for education, whose entire function was to prevent 
child labour, and therefore felt satisfied it had accomplished something, was a 
corproate coitizen... and she got a nice check.
   i would offer that a Baha'i liberation theology >might< be based on 
transorming the hearts of consumers to a view that their self-interest was not 
served by ignoring the suffering of others. it >might< be based on valuing 
people w/o the bach degree as >people< and not parts of a social machine by 
actually acting like service is worship. and i would definitely offer that 
individual Baha'is have amoral duty to act out on what mves them, so long as 
they do not mistake their passions for understandings of the Faith's view of 
the state of the world.
  but, imho historically, other types of admixture or synthesis are about as 
likely to prosper as carrying an ice ax to bed in mexico city. 

 
 
The information contained in this e-mail and any attachments thereto ("e-mail") 
is sent by the Johnson County Community College ("JCCC") and is intended to be 
confidential and for the use of only the individual or entity named above. The 
information may be protected by federal and state privacy and disclosures acts 
or other legal rules. If the reader of this message is not the intended 
recipient, you are notified that retention, dissemination, distribution or 
copying of this e-mail is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail 
in error please immediately notify JCCC by email reply and immediately and 
permanently delete this e-mail message and any attachments thereto. Thank you.
 
 
__
 

You are subscribed to Baha'i Studies as: mailto:archive@mail-archive.com
Unsubscribe: send a blank email to mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subscribe: send subscribe bahai-st in the message body to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subscribe: http://list.jccc.edu:8080/read/all_forums/subscribe?name=bahai-st
Baha'i Studies is available through the following:
Mail - mailto:bahai-st@list.jccc.edu
Web - http://list.jccc.edu:8080/read/?forum=bahai-st
News - news://list.jccc.edu/bahai-st
Public - http://www.escribe.com/religion/bahaist
Old Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.net
New Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.edu


Re: Baha'i Liberation "Theology" ((long quote))

2005-10-07 Thread Mark A. Foster
Dean,

At 12:14 AM 10/7/2005, you wrote:
>>Perhaps Mark means net importer.<<

I am referring to the American corporatocracy and the corporations which make 
it up. 

Via moderna, Mark A. Foster . http://markfoster.net
... [a] word is ... a universal. - William of Ockham
Structurization Tech: http://tech.structurization.com 



 
 
The information contained in this e-mail and any attachments thereto ("e-mail") 
is sent by the Johnson County Community College ("JCCC") and is intended to be 
confidential and for the use of only the individual or entity named above. The 
information may be protected by federal and state privacy and disclosures acts 
or other legal rules. If the reader of this message is not the intended 
recipient, you are notified that retention, dissemination, distribution or 
copying of this e-mail is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail 
in error please immediately notify JCCC by email reply and immediately and 
permanently delete this e-mail message and any attachments thereto. Thank you.
 
 
__
 

You are subscribed to Baha'i Studies as: mailto:archive@mail-archive.com
Unsubscribe: send a blank email to mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subscribe: send subscribe bahai-st in the message body to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subscribe: http://list.jccc.edu:8080/read/all_forums/subscribe?name=bahai-st
Baha'i Studies is available through the following:
Mail - mailto:bahai-st@list.jccc.edu
Web - http://list.jccc.edu:8080/read/?forum=bahai-st
News - news://list.jccc.edu/bahai-st
Public - http://www.escribe.com/religion/bahaist
Old Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.net
New Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.edu


Re: Baha'i Liberation "Theology" ((long quote))

2005-10-06 Thread Dean Betts
>>"Importers, such as the U.S., have little incentive to protest; and any
outrage is drowned out by the demand for cheaper goods"

>Mark, please clarify.  I doubt there is a nation on the planet that is not
an importer.

Perhaps Mark means net importer.





 
 
The information contained in this e-mail and any attachments thereto ("e-mail") 
is sent by the Johnson County Community College ("JCCC") and is intended to be 
confidential and for the use of only the individual or entity named above. The 
information may be protected by federal and state privacy and disclosures acts 
or other legal rules. If the reader of this message is not the intended 
recipient, you are notified that retention, dissemination, distribution or 
copying of this e-mail is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail 
in error please immediately notify JCCC by email reply and immediately and 
permanently delete this e-mail message and any attachments thereto. Thank you.
 
 
__
 

You are subscribed to Baha'i Studies as: mailto:archive@mail-archive.com
Unsubscribe: send a blank email to mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subscribe: send subscribe bahai-st in the message body to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subscribe: http://list.jccc.edu:8080/read/all_forums/subscribe?name=bahai-st
Baha'i Studies is available through the following:
Mail - mailto:bahai-st@list.jccc.edu
Web - http://list.jccc.edu:8080/read/?forum=bahai-st
News - news://list.jccc.edu/bahai-st
Public - http://www.escribe.com/religion/bahaist
Old Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.net
New Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.edu


Re: Baha'i Liberation "Theology"

2005-10-06 Thread Dean Betts
>What did you have in mind as a means of freeing the poor from oppressive
capitalism?

>I'll later return to the question of why are you limiting this to the
adverse effects of capitalism, not >addressing the other "isms" that also
grievously harm people.  But I'm primarily interested in what you >think
could be done, and what means used.

We can address the other "isms", perhaps starting with materialism which
seems to be both a cause and an effect of unbridled capitalism.


   The spirit that sent forth, not so long ago, in such rapid succession, so
many pioneers to such remote areas of the globe, must at all costs and above
everything else, be recaptured, for the twofold purpose of swelling the
number, and of ensuring the continual flow, of pioneers, so essential for
the safeguarding of the prizes won in the course of the several campaigns of
a world-girdling Crusade, and of combatting the evil forces which a
relentless and all-pervasive materialism, the cancerous growth of militant
racialism, political corruption, unbridled capitalism, wide-spread
lawlessness and gross immorality, are, alas, unleashing, with ominous
swiftness, amongst various classes of the society to which the members of
this community belong.
 (Shoghi Effendi:  Citadel of Faith, Page: 154)

No, Baha'u'llah did not bring a complete system of economics to the world.
Profit sharing is recommended as a solution to one form of economic
problems.  There is nothing in the teachings against some kind of
capitalism; its present form, though, would require adjustments to be made."
 (Shoghi Effendi:  Directives of the Guardian, Page: 20)






 
 
The information contained in this e-mail and any attachments thereto ("e-mail") 
is sent by the Johnson County Community College ("JCCC") and is intended to be 
confidential and for the use of only the individual or entity named above. The 
information may be protected by federal and state privacy and disclosures acts 
or other legal rules. If the reader of this message is not the intended 
recipient, you are notified that retention, dissemination, distribution or 
copying of this e-mail is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail 
in error please immediately notify JCCC by email reply and immediately and 
permanently delete this e-mail message and any attachments thereto. Thank you.
 
 
__
 

You are subscribed to Baha'i Studies as: mailto:archive@mail-archive.com
Unsubscribe: send a blank email to mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subscribe: send subscribe bahai-st in the message body to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subscribe: http://list.jccc.edu:8080/read/all_forums/subscribe?name=bahai-st
Baha'i Studies is available through the following:
Mail - mailto:bahai-st@list.jccc.edu
Web - http://list.jccc.edu:8080/read/?forum=bahai-st
News - news://list.jccc.edu/bahai-st
Public - http://www.escribe.com/religion/bahaist
Old Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.net
New Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.edu


RE: Baha'i Liberation "Theology" ((long quote))

2005-10-06 Thread Mark A. Foster
Brent,

At 09:52 PM 10/6/2005, you wrote:
>>Mark, please clarify.  I doubt there is a nation on the planet that is not an 
>>importer.<<

By importers, I am referring to corporate capitalists and transnational 
corporations, i.e., the corporatocracy (corporate power). The U.S. is the 
global center of corporate capitalism, the primary sponsor of the WTO, etc.

>>To remedy the abuses of migrant agricultural workers, the U.S. Congress 
>>passed a law requiring the field owner to get an "H-2A" visa for its 
>>temporary agricultural workers, say, 100 people to pick lettuce. The process 
>>to get visas for these 100 workers requires the following:<<

IMO, they are just bandaids. Mexicans are streaming into the U.S. to take 
low-end jobs. Some of those jobs are on farms in California. A recent survey 
found that more than 50% of Mexicans, if given the choice, would move to the 
U.S. NAFTA and related measures have created a new underclass.

>>So the growers, who would pay the fees if it was a viable process, instead 
>>just revert back to hiring the people illegally.  The remedy, though 
>>well-intentioned, is just too burdensome, I am told.<<

Yes, and governments often look the other way - just as they are doing with 
illegal immigrants. IMO, these problems can only be solved in the context of a 
just, globalized, socialized economy.

Via moderna, Mark A. Foster . http://markfoster.net
... [a] word is ... a universal. - William of Ockham
Structurization Tech: http://tech.structurization.com 



 
 
The information contained in this e-mail and any attachments thereto ("e-mail") 
is sent by the Johnson County Community College ("JCCC") and is intended to be 
confidential and for the use of only the individual or entity named above. The 
information may be protected by federal and state privacy and disclosures acts 
or other legal rules. If the reader of this message is not the intended 
recipient, you are notified that retention, dissemination, distribution or 
copying of this e-mail is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail 
in error please immediately notify JCCC by email reply and immediately and 
permanently delete this e-mail message and any attachments thereto. Thank you.
 
 
__
 

You are subscribed to Baha'i Studies as: mailto:archive@mail-archive.com
Unsubscribe: send a blank email to mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subscribe: send subscribe bahai-st in the message body to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subscribe: http://list.jccc.edu:8080/read/all_forums/subscribe?name=bahai-st
Baha'i Studies is available through the following:
Mail - mailto:bahai-st@list.jccc.edu
Web - http://list.jccc.edu:8080/read/?forum=bahai-st
News - news://list.jccc.edu/bahai-st
Public - http://www.escribe.com/religion/bahaist
Old Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.net
New Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.edu


re: Baha'i Liberation "Theology"

2005-10-06 Thread Mark A. Foster
Brent,

At 09:44 PM 10/6/2005, you wrote:
>>What did you have in mind as a means of freeing the poor from oppressive 
>>capitalism?<<

Here is what I wrote in one of my papers:

"Briefly, a category of praxis which might be immediately utilized in service 
projects for Structurization Tech would involve an active participation in 
social and economic development. Opportunities for volunteerism could run the 
gambit from working for non-profit agencies assisting low-income families and 
individuals to, conceivably, providing aid to victims of natural and man-made 
disasters, especially the poor, should they become displaced to, perhaps even 
more ambitiously, planning and constructing intentional communities for the 
poor and disenfranchised." 

>>I'll later return to the question of why are you limiting this to the adverse 
>>effects of capitalism, not addressing the other "isms" that also grievously 
>>harm people.  But I'm primarily interested in what you think could be done, 
>>and what means used.<<

I accept the Marxist premise that other isms (racism, sexism, militarism, state 
terrorism, classism, ageism, ableism, etc.) operate within the matrix of 
capitalism. 

Via moderna, Mark A. Foster . http://markfoster.net
... [a] word is ... a universal. - William of Ockham
Structurization Tech: http://tech.structurization.com 



 
 
The information contained in this e-mail and any attachments thereto ("e-mail") 
is sent by the Johnson County Community College ("JCCC") and is intended to be 
confidential and for the use of only the individual or entity named above. The 
information may be protected by federal and state privacy and disclosures acts 
or other legal rules. If the reader of this message is not the intended 
recipient, you are notified that retention, dissemination, distribution or 
copying of this e-mail is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail 
in error please immediately notify JCCC by email reply and immediately and 
permanently delete this e-mail message and any attachments thereto. Thank you.
 
 
__
 

You are subscribed to Baha'i Studies as: mailto:archive@mail-archive.com
Unsubscribe: send a blank email to mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subscribe: send subscribe bahai-st in the message body to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subscribe: http://list.jccc.edu:8080/read/all_forums/subscribe?name=bahai-st
Baha'i Studies is available through the following:
Mail - mailto:bahai-st@list.jccc.edu
Web - http://list.jccc.edu:8080/read/?forum=bahai-st
News - news://list.jccc.edu/bahai-st
Public - http://www.escribe.com/religion/bahaist
Old Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.net
New Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.edu


RE: Baha'i Liberation "Theology" ((long quote))

2005-10-06 Thread Brent Poirier
"Importers, such as the U.S., have little incentive to protest; and any outrage 
is drowned out by the demand for cheaper goods"

Mark, please clarify.  I doubt there is a nation on the planet that is not an 
importer.

"Well, the economic abuse of migrant workers is still going on."

To remedy the abuses of migrant agricultural workers, the U.S. Congress passed 
a law requiring the field owner to get an "H-2A" visa for its temporary 
agricultural workers, say, 100 people to pick lettuce. The process to get visas 
for these 100 workers requires the following:

Determine from the state economist the "prevailing wage" paid to US workers in 
that sector, and agree to match that wage

Advertise for American workers for a period of time 

The Labor Department then certifies that the salary offered is correct, and 
that no US workers applied.  

The employer then needs:

A certificate from the Department of Transportation that the buses carrying the 
workers to the fields are in proper shape

A certificate from the Food and Drug Administration that the food being 
provided to the workers is nutritious

A certificate from the Department of Housing and Urban Development that the 
lodging provided is habitable

A certificate from the Environmental Protection Agency that proper safeguards 
are provided against pesticides and fertilizers

Certificates from the Department of Health, etc. etc. -- in all about a dozen 
such certificates.  All of these require that an inspector come to the facility 
and view the food, the water, the lodging, the buses, the equipment, etc.  And 
this cannot be done ahead of time, it must be within a strict time frame.  And 
all of this time -- the lettuce is in the field approaching the stage where it 
rots.

I do not handle these visas, they are far too complex, and I only know two 
immigration lawyers who do.  One charges 15 thousand dollars, and the other, 20 
thousand dollars.  They take a huge amount of time, and these applications, 
certificates, advertisements, and inspections all must be feathered together 
within a tolerance of a few days. If one step is missed, the entire process is 
invalidated and no visas issued to the workers.

Requiring all of these inspections is surely the result of the abuses of 
migrant workers for decades.  However, the response is so onerous, and the time 
frame so short, and some of the requirements so needless (Americans are not 
applying for the job, yet the advertising must be done anyway) that the end 
result is that often, there is insufficient time to get the visas in time to 
save the harvest.  So the growers, who would pay the fees if it was a viable 
process, instead just revert back to hiring the people illegally.  The remedy, 
though well-intentioned, is just too burdensome, I am told.

And once the worker works illegally, and lives in the USA illegally for more 
than one year, even if the worker later qualifies for a visa, he or she is 
required to leave the USA for ten years before being permitted to get a visa.  
Often these workers are the most valuable employees -- they don't call in sick, 
they are trustworthy, I have heard dozens of employers tell me that their 
employees they just found out are illegal, are far and away their best 
employees.  And there is no remedy for them; they are not allowed to get lawful 
visas, unless they marry a US citizen.  But based on employment alone -- 
nothing can be done for them.  They are effectively sentenced to a lifetime 
"under the table."

Brent

 
 
The information contained in this e-mail and any attachments thereto ("e-mail") 
is sent by the Johnson County Community College ("JCCC") and is intended to be 
confidential and for the use of only the individual or entity named above. The 
information may be protected by federal and state privacy and disclosures acts 
or other legal rules. If the reader of this message is not the intended 
recipient, you are notified that retention, dissemination, distribution or 
copying of this e-mail is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail 
in error please immediately notify JCCC by email reply and immediately and 
permanently delete this e-mail message and any attachments thereto. Thank you.
 
 
__
 

You are subscribed to Baha'i Studies as: mailto:archive@mail-archive.com
Unsubscribe: send a blank email to mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subscribe: send subscribe bahai-st in the message body to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subscribe: http://list.jccc.edu:8080/read/all_forums/subscribe?name=bahai-st
Baha'i Studies is available through the following:
Mail - mailto:bahai-st@list.jccc.edu
Web - http://list.jccc.edu:8080/read/?forum=bahai-st
News - news://list.jccc.edu/bahai-st
Public - http://www.escribe.com/religion/bahaist
Old Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.net
New Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.edu


re: Baha'i Liberation "Theology"

2005-10-06 Thread Brent Poirier
>>In a Baha'i liberation "theology," what role, if any, should Baha'is play in 
>>freeing the poor from oppressive capitalism? Will we be judged if we do not?>>

What did you have in mind as a means of freeing the poor from oppressive 
capitalism?

I'll later return to the question of why are you limiting this to the adverse 
effects of capitalism, not addressing the other "isms" that also grievously 
harm people.  But I'm primarily interested in what you think could be done, and 
what means used.

Brent

 
 
The information contained in this e-mail and any attachments thereto ("e-mail") 
is sent by the Johnson County Community College ("JCCC") and is intended to be 
confidential and for the use of only the individual or entity named above. The 
information may be protected by federal and state privacy and disclosures acts 
or other legal rules. If the reader of this message is not the intended 
recipient, you are notified that retention, dissemination, distribution or 
copying of this e-mail is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail 
in error please immediately notify JCCC by email reply and immediately and 
permanently delete this e-mail message and any attachments thereto. Thank you.
 
 
__
 

You are subscribed to Baha'i Studies as: mailto:archive@mail-archive.com
Unsubscribe: send a blank email to mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subscribe: send subscribe bahai-st in the message body to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subscribe: http://list.jccc.edu:8080/read/all_forums/subscribe?name=bahai-st
Baha'i Studies is available through the following:
Mail - mailto:bahai-st@list.jccc.edu
Web - http://list.jccc.edu:8080/read/?forum=bahai-st
News - news://list.jccc.edu/bahai-st
Public - http://www.escribe.com/religion/bahaist
Old Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.net
New Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.edu


RE: Baha'i Liberation "Theology" ((long quote))

2005-10-06 Thread Ian Kluge










Dear mark, 

 

You write:

 

"Harmonization" can be defined in different ways; and
"uniformity" is one of those definitions. It may sound nice to say
that we should not work at cross-purposes. However, I have *frequently* seen
terms such as "unified action" misused to suppress diversity and
individual initiative and to impose uniformity."

 

I agree, that *can* happen - but we're
talking in a Baha’i context here and I think the Universal house of
Justice is fully able to comprehend and implement the difference between
harmonisation as uniformity and harmonisation as co-ordination of various
methodologies. 

 

You write: 

 

"I see no "crucial areas of similarity" between Marshall
Tito's Yugoslavia and Kim Il
Sung's North Korea
- only superficial ones."

 

I know *a lot* of Serbs and Croatians and they would be stunned by your
statement that they did not live in a Communist state. So would Milvan Djilas
(author of the explosive "The New Class: An Analysis of the 
Communist" System [1957])His insider's book was especially focussed on Yugoslavia
as a Communist state. 

 

Both Tito's Yugoslavia
and Sung's North Korea
were run on strict Marxist/Communist dogma: class struggle, Party as vanguard,
historical and dialectical materialism etc.  

 

You write: 

 

"You have simply provided a definition: Communist states are
totalitarian. Well, modern mainland China is not totalitarian. Using
conventional definitions, it would be authoritarian. "

 

But I did not say all totalitarian states
are communist. China
is was and to a large extent still totalitarian e.g. does not recognise the
difference between public and private spheres of existence - which is why it
persecutes people for private opinions. Religious beliefs and keeps close
control of the internet.  

 

Although China *was* fully Communist (and
totalitarian) it is, as I have said before, in the process of dismantling
Communism - although it is still trying to hang on to the totalitarian aspect
of Communism. 

 

You write: 

 

"And Karl Marx did not advocate totalitarianism either. His (and
Engels') view of "communism" was a classless, stateless society
(succeeding socialism)."

 

But first they advocated dictatorship of
the proletariat - a phase no Communist country has ever gotten beyond. The fact
is there has never been a Communist state which has not also been totalitarian.
They are correlates. 

 

And, as I've said before, what person -
then or now - with a lick of people smarts would ever take the vision of a
stateless modern society seriously? That was just honey for flies. 

 

You write: 

 

"Well, now we are going back to our realism-nominalism discussion.
I don't think we will likely agree on that subject. People did not live under
communism. They lived under particular governments. Certain people decided, on
the basis of their own standards of evaluation, to place those governments
under the same category."

 

People lived under a particular
governments whose policies were guided by the work of Marx, Lenin, Stalin etc.
Those ideas and works shared a certain number of similarities labelled
'Communism.' It could have labelled XYZ but the similarities remain. 

 

You write: 

 

"Actually, Maoist communism was frequently very successful (though
not by the standards of some Westerners). Personally, I would like to see the
Chinese government renew many of Mao's ideas (before his paranoia about the Soviet Union, etc., and other factors, led him to embark
on his cultural revolution). Instead, they are creating a synthesis of
corporate capitalism and Confucianism. The peasants are being
disenfranchised."

Like the "Great Leap Forward" maybe, with its app. 30 million famine
victims? (http://66.102.7.104/search?q=cache:GZJAVj8ap1gJ:www.mindground.net/glp.html+The+great+leap+forward&hl=en)


 

What's important however  - and the key issue in this discussion -  is
the fact that the Chinese leadership has recognised that a modern
industrialized society cannot be built on Marxist/Communist principles. 

 

You write: 

 

>>That's what he and his followers *claimed* - but then they
stood to be the new  ruling class. Nothing in T's record encourages us to take
these claims at face value. A corrupt leader like Brezshnev also claimed to be
empowering the proletariat.<<

 

"What Brezshnev said or did is not relevant. We only have
Trotsky's words to go on, since he was forced into exile and murdered. He never
had the chance to prove himself as the Communist leader."

 

Really? He was 'only' the leader of the
world's most powerful Communist state for 18 years. That's 25% of the span of
Communist rule in Russia.
I would think his words and deeds *very* relevant. 

 

We have more than Trotsky's words - we
have his actions and there is nothing in his actions to suggest he would have
become anything than their heir of Lenin vis-à-vis his reliance on terror and
force. Trotsky/Stalin? Six of one, half-a-dozen of the other. 

 

You write: 


RE: Baha'i Liberation "Theology" ((long quote))

2005-10-06 Thread Mark A. Foster
Ian,

At 04:47 PM 10/5/2005, you wrote:
>>I said harmonization - which some might regard as uniformity. However, 
>>methods must not work at cross-purposes.<<

Yes, you wrote:

"The methodologies do not need to be 'uniform' but they must harmonise and 
cannot work at cross-purposes. I suppose one might regard that harmonization as 
a kind of uniformity."

"Harmonization" can be defined in different ways; and "uniformity" is one of 
those definitions. It may sound nice to say that we should not work at 
cross-purposes. However, I have *frequently* seen terms such as "unified 
action" misused to suppress diversity and individual initiative and to impose 
uniformity.

>>I disagree. There is variety and diversity within Communism but there are 
>>also crucial areas of similarity.<<

I see no "crucial areas of similarity" between Marshall Tito's Yugoslavia and 
Kim Il Sung's North Korea - only superficial ones.

>>Their survival is not the issue here. The point is they are Communist states, 
>>and like all communist states, totalitarian.<<

You have simply provided a definition: Communist states are totalitarian. Well, 
modern mainland China is not totalitarian. Using conventional definitions, it 
would be authoritarian. 

And Karl Marx did not advocate totalitarianism either. His (and Engels') view 
of "communism" was a classless, stateless society (succeeding socialism).

>>Well, I'm an essentialist after all. Of course there is such an ideology we 
>>call Communism:  ask the billions who have lived under it.<<

Well, now we are going back to our realism-nominalism discussion. I don't think 
we will likely agree on that subject. People did not live under communism. They 
lived under particular governments. Certain people decided, on the basis of 
their own standards of evaluation, to place those governments under the same 
category.

>>That's beside the point. The point is that China has realised that Communism 
>>simply doesn't work as an economic/social system and  is moving away from it 
>>step by step.<<

Actually, Maoist communism was frequently very successful (though not by the 
standards of some Westerners). Personally, I would like to see the Chinese 
government renew many of Mao's ideas (before his paranoia about the Soviet 
Union, etc., and other factors, led him to embark on his cultural revolution). 
Instead, they are creating a synthesis of corporate capitalism and 
Confucianism. The peasants are being disenfranchised.

>>That's what he and his followers *claimed* - but then they stood to be the 
>>new  ruling class. Nothing in T's record encourages us to take these claims 
>>at face value. A corrupt leader like Brezshnev also claimed to be empowering 
>>the proletariat.<<

What Brezshnev said or did is not relevant. We only have Trotsky's words to go 
on, since he was forced into exile and murdered. He never had the chance to 
prove himself as the Communist leader.

>>But you did bring in Marxism and Trotsky several times in a Bahai context and 
>>that naturally raises the question, 'Why?'<<

I bring it up because of my perspectivism (in some cases, to illustrate it). I 
have no problem holding several radically different, contradictory, and 
apparently unconnected points of view in my mind simultaneously. IMO, they are 
all just relative narratives.

>>Could you do us a favour, please? When you speak as a Baha'i preface the 
>>remark with a '(B)' and when you speak as a sociologist with an '(S)'. That 
>>would clarify your communications and help us understand what you are trying 
>>to say.<<

Ian, I could say the same to you. When you speak about your "common sense 
realism," put an "R" and a "B" when you are speaking of the Baha'i Faith. ;-)

>>That's beside the point. The fact is, Marx's claim was not to be taken 
>>seriously by anyone (not just Communist leaders) since the withering away of 
>>the state is as childishly naïve as the claim that a man could be a hunter in 
>>the morning, a fisherman in the afternoon, a shepherd in the evening and a 
>>critic after supper.<<

I agree it is impractical and overly idealistic - not that it is exactly naive. 
The principal difference between Marx and Engels' communism and Bakunin's 
communism is that the latter rejected the prerequisite of socialism (the 
instrumentality of the state). If you remove the socialism from Marx and 
Engels' views, you have anarchism.

>>Anyone with two licks worth of common sense knows this is rubbish.<<

There are a lot of people, with a great deal of common sense, who, even now, 
are working toward socialism (with communism as the ultimate objective). Two of 
those people are my colleagues in the Sociology Department. Because I am a 
Baha'i, and cannot participate in these activities, my use of Marxism is more 
methodological (dialectical materialism) than practical. 

However, my own view is that a global revolution *is* occurring right now. Marx 
was correct about the revolution but wrong about what it would look 

RE: Baha'i Liberation "Theology" ((long quote))

2005-10-05 Thread Ian Kluge
Dear Mark, 

"Uniformity is, IMO, entirely inconsistent with the principle of unity in
diversity. How can you justify any kind of uniformity from the Baha'i
sources?"

I said harmonization - which some might regard as uniformity. However,
methods must not work at cross-purposes. 

You write: 

"There is no "it." Communism is simply a name; and the various communisms
which developed have little similarity, except in vocabulary, with Marx's
views."

I disagree. There is variety and diversity within Communism but there are
also crucial areas of similarity. 

 You write re Cuba and N. Vietnam:

"Those are two of the places I mentioned. However, from everything I have
seen, I doubt that they will survive, as dictatorships, for another
generation."

Their survival is not the issue here. The point is they are Communist
states, and like all communist states, totalitarian. 

 You write: 

"Again, you are "essentializing," to use Popper's term, a category. There is
no such *thing* as communism."

Well, I'm an essentialist after all. Of course there is such an ideology we
call Communism:  ask the billions who have lived under it. 

You write: 

"Capitalism in China is cementing the divide between the new class of
industrialists and the peasants."

That's beside the point. The point is that China has realised that Communism
simply doesn't work as an economic/social system and  is moving away from it
step by step.

You write: 

"It was not "his own." Trotsky wanted to see a worker's revolution and
dictatorship."

That's what he and his followers *claimed* - but then they stood to be the
new  ruling class. Nothing in T's record encourages us to take these claims
at face value. A corrupt leader like Brezshnev also claimed to be empowering
the proletariat. 

You write: 

"I do not connect Marxism with the Baha'i Faith. When I refer to Marxism, I
am not speaking as a Baha'i but as a critical sociologist."

But you did bring in Marxism and Trotsky several times in a Bahai context
and that naturally raises the question, 'Why?'

Could you do us a favour, please? When you speak as a Baha'i preface the
remark with a '(B)' and when you speak as a sociologist with an '(S)'. That
would clarify your communications and help us understand what you are trying
to say.  

You write:  

"Engels was not a politician. He was a revolutionary and an author. He was
not responsible for what other people did in his and Marx's names."

That's beside the point. The fact is, Marx's claim was not to be taken
seriously by anyone (not just Communist leaders) since the withering away of
the state is as childishly naïve as the claim that a man could be a hunter
in the morning, a fisherman in the afternoon, a shepherd in the evening and
a critic after supper. 

Anyone with two licks worth of common sense knows this is rubbish.  

You write: 

"I have said many times on this list that I do not. There may be some
connections. I have read papers which have attempted to explore them.
However, *all* of them struck me as academically weak and poorly
constructed."

So why did you bring the Communists and Trotsky in to begin with? What was
that all about? 

You write: 

"I don't know what else I can do except to repeat that I am not advocating
partisan political activity. I have said so many times. However, I am not
going to abandon Marxism and post-Marxism because some people want to read
into my comments their own viewpoints."

So you want to keep using a private language  . . .? You're free to do so
but it won't help other people understand what you're trying to say. 

You write: 

"Lenin *tried* to follow Marx in some areas. Stalin simply threw Marx out
the window and retained only the vocabulary. (It was that vocabulary which
Stalin shared with Lenin.) In Stalin's Soviet Union, Marx and Engels would
likely have ended up in a gulag."

Yes, these the myths that defenders of Marxism try to promulgate in an
effort to distance themselves from Lenin, Stalin, Krushchev, Mao, Castro,
Pol Pot etc etc etc. 

At some point, however, they have to wake up a smell the coffee: if all
attempts to apply Marx's ideas have gone so horribly wrong, maybe there is
something horribly wrong with Marx's ideas. 

You write: 

"They can say so, but you would not be able to find anything in Marx which
would have justified it. The proletariat was oppressed in the Soviet Union,
and no amount of spinning by the Politburo or Pravda could change that."

They did say so and they extracted this idea of the revolutionary vanguard
from Marx's writings and actions. Marx kicked Bakunin out of the
International in order to to achieve ideologically uniformity/cohesion
within the Communist Party so that he and his inner cadre could promote the
interests of the working class. 

Marx also learned that lesson from the Paris Commune: without a disciplined
party leading them, the proletariat was unable to work effectively towards
its own best interests. 

You write: 

"However, this is a Baha'i Studies

RE: Baha'i Liberation "Theology" ((long quote))

2005-10-05 Thread Ian Kluge
Dear Mark, 

You write: 

"Uniformity is, IMO, entirely inconsistent with the principle of unity in
diversity. How can you justify any kind of uniformity from the Baha'i
sources?"

I said harmonization - which some might regard as uniformity. However,
methods must not work at cross-purposes. 

You write: 

"There is no "it." Communism is simply a name; and the various communisms
which developed have little similarity, except in vocabulary, with Marx's
views."

I disagree. There is variety and diversity within Communism but there are
also crucial areas of similarity. 

 You write re Cuba and N. Vietnam:

"Those are two of the places I mentioned. However, from everything I have
seen, I doubt that they will survive, as dictatorships, for another
generation."

Their survival is not the issue here. The point is they are Communist
states, and like all communist states, totalitarian. 

 You write: 

"Again, you are "essentializing," to use Popper's term, a category. There is
no such *thing* as communism."

Well, I'm an essentialist after all. Of course there is such an ideology we
call Communism:  ask the billions who have lived under it. 

You write: 

"Capitalism in China is cementing the divide between the new class of
industrialists and the peasants."

That's beside the point. The point is that China has realised that Communism
simply doesn't work as an economic/social system and  is moving away from it
step by step.

You write: 

"It was not "his own." Trotsky wanted to see a worker's revolution and
dictatorship."

That's what he and his followers *claimed* - but then they stood to be the
new  ruling class. Nothing in T's record encourages us to take these claims
at face value. A corrupt leader like Brezshnev also claimed to be empowering
the proletariat. 

You write: 

"I do not connect Marxism with the Baha'i Faith. When I refer to Marxism, I
am not speaking as a Baha'i but as a critical sociologist."

But you did bring in Marxism and Trotsky several times in a Bahai context
and that naturally raises the question, 'Why?'

Could you do us a favour, please? When you speak as a Baha'i preface the
remark with a '(B)' and when you speak as a sociologist with an '(S)'. That
would clarify your communications and help us understand what you are trying
to say.  

You write:  

"Engels was not a politician. He was a revolutionary and an author. He was
not responsible for what other people did in his and Marx's names."

That's beside the point. The fact is, Marx's claim was not to be taken
seriously by anyone (not just Communist leaders) since the withering away of
the state is as childishly naïve as the claim that a man could be a hunter
in the morning, a fisherman in the afternoon, a shepherd in the evening and
a critic after supper. 

Anyone with two licks worth of common sense knows this is rubbish.  

You write: 

"I have said many times on this list that I do not. There may be some
connections. I have read papers which have attempted to explore them.
However, *all* of them struck me as academically weak and poorly
constructed."

So why did you bring the Communists and Trotsky in to begin with? What was
that all about? 

You write: 

"I don't know what else I can do except to repeat that I am not advocating
partisan political activity. I have said so many times. However, I am not
going to abandon Marxism and post-Marxism because some people want to read
into my comments their own viewpoints."

So you want to keep using a private language  . . .? You're free to do so
but it won't help other people understand what you're trying to say. 

You write: 

"Lenin *tried* to follow Marx in some areas. Stalin simply threw Marx out
the window and retained only the vocabulary. (It was that vocabulary which
Stalin shared with Lenin.) In Stalin's Soviet Union, Marx and Engels would
likely have ended up in a gulag."

Yes, these the myths that defenders of Marxism try to promulgate in an
effort to distance themselves from Lenin, Stalin, Krushchev, Mao, Castro,
Pol Pot etc etc etc. 

At some point, however, they have to wake up a smell the coffee: if all
attempts to apply Marx's ideas have gone so horribly wrong, maybe there is
something horribly wrong with Marx's ideas. 

You write: 

"They can say so, but you would not be able to find anything in Marx which
would have justified it. The proletariat was oppressed in the Soviet Union,
and no amount of spinning by the Politburo or Pravda could change that."

They did say so and they extracted this idea of the revolutionary vanguard
from Marx's writings and actions. Marx kicked Bakunin out of the
International in order to to achieve ideologically uniformity/cohesion
within the Communist Party so that he and his inner cadre could promote the
interests of the working class. 

Marx also learned that lesson from the Paris Commune: without a disciplined
party leading them, the proletariat was unable to work effectively towards
its own best interests. 

You write: 

"However, this is a B

RE: Baha'i Liberation "Theology" ((long quote))

2005-10-04 Thread Mark A. Foster
Ian,

At 09:06 PM 10/4/2005, you wrote:
>>The methodologies do not need to be "uniform" but they must harmonise and 
>>cannot work at cross-purposes. I suppose one might regard that harmonization 
>>as a kind of uniformity.<<

Uniformity is, IMO, entirely inconsistent with the principle of unity in 
diversity. How can you justify any kind of uniformity from the Baha'i sources?

In terms of harmony, well, it depends on how it is defined. Sometimes harmony 
is simply a euphemism for a suppression of diversity. For instance, I have 
occasionally seen Baha'is, often persons rather well-respected in their Baha'i 
communities, cut off any disagreement on the grounds that it is "disunity." 

>>I disagree. Marxist-Leninism failed to evolve significantly over 70 years - 
>>which is why it either collapsed or is being abandoned.<< 

There is no "it." Communism is simply a name; and the various communisms which 
developed have little similarity, except in vocabulary, with Marx's views.

>>Cuba and North Korea are still Communist to the hilt.<<

Those are two of the places I mentioned. However, from everything I have seen, 
I doubt that they will survive, as dictatorships, for another generation.

>>Viet Nam has already made the first moves away from Communism. Both Cuba and 
>>N. Korea are clear demonstrations that Marxism/Communism simply doesn't work 
>>as a basis for society-building or economics.<<

Again, you are "essentializing," to use Popper's term, a category. There is no 
such *thing* as communism.

>>Having learned from Russia's mistake, China is dismantling Communism one step 
>>at a time; the Chinese know Marxism and Communism just don't work. North Viet 
>>Vam is making similar moves.<<

Capitalism in China is cementing the divide between the new class of 
industrialists and the peasants.

>>Trotsky stood up to Stalin's dictatorship simply in order to impose his own.<<

It was not "his own." Trotsky wanted to see a worker's revolution and 
dictatorship.

>>The point of the quotes from Lynch is that Trotsky has nothing to offer us 
>>and we Baha'is have no need of anything he has to offer.<<

I do not connect Marxism with the Baha'i Faith. When I refer to Marxism, I am 
not speaking as a Baha'i but as a critical sociologist.

>>Do you take that seriously? Has there ever been the slightest sign of any 
>>communist leader anywhere at any time ever taking that seriously? This is the 
>>honey to catch the flies.<<

Engels was not a politician. He was a revolutionary and an author. He was not 
responsible for what other people did in his and Marx's names.

>>I'm surprised to hear that since you brought up Trotskyism often enough to 
>>make me and possibly others think you saw some kind of connection.<<

I have said many times on this list that I do not. There may be some 
connections. I have read papers which have attempted to explore them. However, 
*all* of them struck me as academically weak and poorly constructed. 

>>If you want to communicate effectively with other people, you're going to 
>>have to take some note of what words generally mean in the public sphere and 
>>not just what they mean to you personally. Otherwise we're down to private 
>>languages (remember Wittgenstein).<<

I don't know what else I can do except to repeat that I am not advocating 
partisan political activity. I have said so many times. However, I am not going 
to abandon Marxism and post-Marxism because some people want to read into my 
comments their own viewpoints.

>>Yes, Stalin followed in Lenin's footsteps in many important respects. Check 
>>out the quotes from the article I sent in the last post.<<

Lenin *tried* to follow Marx in some areas. Stalin simply threw Marx out the 
window and retained only the vocabulary. (It was that vocabulary which Stalin 
shared with Lenin.) In Stalin's Soviet Union, Marx and Engels would likely have 
ended up in a gulag.

>>The Communist party regards itself as the vanguard which represents the true 
>>interests of the proletariat and, therefore, its rule is the dictatorship of 
>>the proletariat. If the intelligentsia are working within the Communist Party 
>>and subservient to its goals, they are in fact, representing the best 
>>interests of the proletariat.<<

They can say so, but you would not be able to find anything in Marx which would 
have justified it. The proletariat was oppressed in the Soviet Union, and no 
amount of spinning by the Politburo or Pravda could change that.

>>The fact is we have to communicate to a far larger audience than the tiny 
>>collective of religious scholars and sociologists.<<

However, this is a Baha'i Studies list. I do not abandon a vocabulary because 
non-specialists may find it disagreeable. 

>>Nonsense. Researchers, thinkers, etc. can legitimise things just by talking 
>>about them. Take 'recovered memory syndrome' for example, which became 
>>legitimised to the point of sending people to jail. (Fortunately some other 
>>academics put an end t

RE: Baha'i Liberation "Theology"

2005-10-04 Thread Mark A. Foster
Tim,

At 09:35 PM 10/4/2005, you wrote:
>>Hey that's a fun game, can I play too?<<

Obviously, I would not refer to liberation theology if I didn't admire some of 
the other liberation theologies. However, liberation theology is not an 
unembodied universal. Apart from a particular religious context, there is no 
liberation theology. In that sense, it is more methodological than substantive.

>>How about a group of goodhearted scholars who enjoy doing needlework?  They 
>>are the Kindly Knowledgeable Knitters... otherwise known as the  KKK. As you 
>>say, KKK is just a term, it depends on how you define it.<<

I don't see how that relates to the issue. I did not pull the term "liberation 
theology" out of the air. I am using it because I find some other liberation 
theologies to be appealing.

>>As Humpty Dumpty said "a word means just what I choose it to mean." :^)  :^)<<

IMO, that is true by definition.

Via moderna, Mark A. Foster . http://markfoster.net
... [a] word is ... a universal. - William of Ockham
Structurization Tech: http://tech.structurization.com 



 
 
The information contained in this e-mail and any attachments thereto ("e-mail") 
is sent by the Johnson County Community College ("JCCC") and is intended to be 
confidential and for the use of only the individual or entity named above. The 
information may be protected by federal and state privacy and disclosures acts 
or other legal rules. If the reader of this message is not the intended 
recipient, you are notified that retention, dissemination, distribution or 
copying of this e-mail is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail 
in error please immediately notify JCCC by email reply and immediately and 
permanently delete this e-mail message and any attachments thereto. Thank you.
 
 
__
 

You are subscribed to Baha'i Studies as: mailto:archive@mail-archive.com
Unsubscribe: send a blank email to mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subscribe: send subscribe bahai-st in the message body to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subscribe: http://list.jccc.edu:8080/read/all_forums/subscribe?name=bahai-st
Baha'i Studies is available through the following:
Mail - mailto:bahai-st@list.jccc.edu
Web - http://list.jccc.edu:8080/read/?forum=bahai-st
News - news://list.jccc.edu/bahai-st
Public - http://www.escribe.com/religion/bahaist
Old Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.net
New Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.edu


RE: Baha'i Liberation "Theology"

2005-10-04 Thread Tim Nolan






Hi Mark,
 
>"Liberation theology" is just a term, and it depends on how you define it.<
 
Hey that's a fun game, can I play too?
 
How about a group of goodhearted scholars who enjoy
doing needlework?  They are the Kindly Knowledgeable Knitters...
otherwise known as the  KKK. As you say, KKK is just a term,
it depends on how you define it.
 
Here's another one:  A group of Canadians who like to
put inked stamps on striped wild horses.  They are
the North American Zebra Inkers(NAZIs)
Hey, as you say, Nazi is just a term, it depends on 
how you define it.
As Humpty Dumpty said "a word means just what I choose it to mean."
:^)  :^)
 
Tim Nolan
		Yahoo! for Good 
Click here to donate to the Hurricane Katrina relief effort. 






 
 

The information contained in this e-mail and any attachments thereto ("e-mail") is sent by the Johnson County Community College ("JCCC") and is intended to be confidential and for the use of only the individual or entity named above. The information may be protected by federal and state privacy and disclosures acts or other legal rules. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are notified that retention, dissemination, distribution or copying of this e-mail is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error please immediately notify JCCC by email reply and immediately and permanently delete this e-mail message and any attachments thereto. Thank you.



 
 

__



 


You are subscribed to Baha'i Studies as: mailto:archive@mail-archive.com
Unsubscribe: send a blank email to mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subscribe: send subscribe bahai-st in the message body to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subscribe: http://list.jccc.edu:8080/read/all_forums/subscribe?name=bahai-st
Baha'i Studies is available through the following:
Mail - mailto:bahai-st@list.jccc.edu
Web - http://list.jccc.edu:8080/read/?forum=bahai-st
News - news://list.jccc.edu/bahai-st
Public - http://www.escribe.com/religion/bahaist
Old Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.net
New Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.edu





RE: Baha'i Liberation "Theology" ((long quote))

2005-10-04 Thread Ian Kluge
Dear Mark, 

You write:

"The "goals" are contained in the Plans from the House of Justice, the
national plans formulated by NSAs, etc. I see no reason why the achievement
of those goals cannot be accomplished with the framework of the Baha'i
principle of unity in diversity. Shared goals do not necessarily demand
uniform methodologies."

The methodologies do not need to be "uniform" but they must harmonise and
cannot work at cross-purposes. I suppose one might regard that harmonization
as a kind of uniformity. 

You write: 

"The Marxism-Lenism of Shoghi Effendi's day is about gone. Most so-called
communist states today - with the exception of Cuba, North Korea, and one or
two former Soviet republics (some would include Russia) - are are really
authoritarian or right-wing (not totalitarian) dictatorships. They have
varying degrees of centralized political control accompanied by private
enterprise."

I disagree. Marxist-Leninism failed to evolve significantly over 70 years -
which is why it either collapsed or is being abandoned. Cuba and North Korea
are still Communist to the hilt. Viet Nam has already made the first moves
away from Communism. Both Cuba and N. Korea are clear demonstrations that
Marxism/Communism simply doesn't work as a basis for society-building or
economics. 

You write:

"Communism is merely a name or a category. Are China and North Vietnam
communist? Some people think so, but not by my definition."

Having learned from Russia's mistake, China is dismantling Communism one
step at a time; the Chinese know Marxism and Communism just don't work.
North Viet Vam is making similar moves. 

You write: 

"I am not talking about his character. I am referring to his willingness to
stand up to the Stalinist perversion ("state capitalism") of Marx's ideas.
As far as his extreme behavior goes, that is part and parcel of being a
revolutionary. A gentle political revolutionary is no revolutionary at all."

Trotsky stood up to Stalin's dictatorship simply in order to impose his own.


"State capitalism" is exactly what Marx leads to. Only the Left Communists
imagined it otherwise - and they never got anywhere precisely because they
were fighting what was clearly present in Marx et al. 

You write:

>>Trotsky's enforced militarisation of labour, his crushing of the trade
unions, the extreme methods he used to discipline the Red Army, his savagery
against the Kronstadt rebels in 1921, and his ferocity towards the Russian
peasantry undermine the romantic image of him as `the angel of
enlightenment' in an otherwise cruel world.<<

"I don't know anyone who likes Trotsky because he was a sweetheart,"

IAN: 

The point of the quotes from Lynch is that Trotsky has nothing to offer us
and we Baha'is have no need of anything he has to offer. 

You write:

>>(2) "The road to socialism lies through the highest concentration of state
power.<<

That is the road to socialism, yes. However, in communism, "even the state
will wither away and die," as Engels wrote in the last volume of Das
Kapital."

IAN:

Do you take that seriously? Has there ever been the slightest sign of any
communist leader anywhere at any time ever taking that seriously? This is
the honey to catch the flies. 

You write

"I have never, and would never, compare Trotsky to Baha'is. I see no
connection."

IAN:

I'm surprised to hear that since you brought up Trotskyism often enough to
make me and possibly others think you saw some kind of connection. 

You write: 

"However, I explicitly said, Ian, that I am not advocating involvement in
partisan politics. Marxism, like communism, is not a thing. My construction
of Marxism (so-called post-Marxism) is obviously not what you have in your
head."

IAN:

If you want to communicate effectively with other people, you're going to
have to take some note of what words generally mean in the public sphere and
not just what they mean to you personally. Otherwise we're down to private
languages (remember Wittgenstein).

You write:

>>I get the impression you subscribe to the notion that all of Communism's
evils can be placed at Stalin's door. Stalin simply followed in Lenin's
footsteps; both based themselves on Marx's severely flawed social and
historical analysis.<<

"Followed in Lenin's footsteps???"

IAN: 

Yes, Stalin followed in Lenin's footsteps in many important respects. Check
out the quotes from the article I sent in the last post. 


You write: 

>>Not really. Stalin simply put into practice Marx's dictatorship of the
proletariat and his dictum that violence [force] is the midwife of history.
(Das Kapital)<<

Impossible. Marx's dictatorship of the proletariat (socialism) was a, um,
dictatorship of the *proletariat*. Russia was never a capitalist state
(really more feudal) and, therefore, could not have a dictatorship of the
proletariat. The Soviet Union, during and after Stalin, was a dictatorship
of the intelligentsia."

IAN:

The Communist party regards itself as the vanguard which represents the true

RE: Baha'i Liberation "Theology" ((long quote))

2005-10-04 Thread Mark A. Foster
Ian,

At 11:28 AM 10/4/2005, you wrote:
>>Working effectively for a cause requires (a) working for the same ultimate 
>>goals, (b) working for proximate goals that, at the very least, do not 
>>contradict each other, (c) co-ordinating efforts i.e. adopting methodologies 
>>that harmonise and do not work at cross-purposes and (d) setting aside a lot 
>>of personal preferences. All this used to be called "party discipline" in the 
>>Communist parties.<<

The "goals" are contained in the Plans from the House of Justice, the national 
plans formulated by NSAs, etc. I see no reason why the achievement of those 
goals cannot be accomplished with the framework of the Baha'i principle of 
unity in diversity. Shared goals do not necessarily demand uniform 
methodologies.

>>That's a pretty good list though I think Shoghi Effendi talks about 
>>"unbridled capitalism" rather than "corporate capitalism." I would also add 
>>Communism. The Guardian calls it one of the "three false gods" (The Promised 
>>Day is Come 113) and says,<<

The Marxism-Lenism of Shoghi Effendi's day is about gone. Most so-called 
communist states today - with the exception of Cuba, North Korea, and one or 
two former Soviet republics (some would include Russia) - are are really 
authoritarian or right-wing (not totalitarian) dictatorships. They have varying 
degrees of centralized political control accompanied by private enterprise.

Communism is merely a name or a category. Are China and North Vietnam 
communist? Some people think so, but not by my definition.

>>Why not? Trotsky was a thoroughly unpleasant piece of baggage both as a man 
>>and in his ideas. I'm not sure why you admire him so much. The following is 
>>by Michael Lynch in the History Review, 1999)<<

I am not talking about his character. I am referring to his willingness to 
stand up to the Stalinist perversion ("state capitalism") of Marx's ideas. As 
far as his extreme behavior goes, that is part and parcel of being a 
revolutionary. A gentle political revolutionary is no revolutionary at all.

>>"Stalinism, therefore, was not a reversal of Leninism but a continuation of 
>>it."<<

Continuation? Sure. But it was a *progression* of Marxist-Leninism.

>>Trotsky's enforced militarisation of labour, his crushing of the trade 
>>unions, the extreme methods he used to discipline the Red Army, his savagery 
>>against the Kronstadt rebels in 1921, and his ferocity towards the Russian 
>>peasantry undermine the romantic image of him as `the angel of enlightenment' 
>>in an otherwise cruel world.<<

I don't know anyone who likes Trotsky because he was a sweetheart,

>>(2) "The road to socialism lies through the highest concentration of state 
>>power.<<

That is the road to socialism, yes. However, in communism, "even the state will 
wither away and die," as Engels wrote in the last volume of Das Kapital.

>>Nothing about Trotsky or his career suggests that he is a suitable role model 
>>or intellectual partner for Baha'is.<<

I have never, and would never, compare Trotsky to Baha'is. I see no connection.

>>I disagree on both counts. Stalin was the logical outcome of Marx and Lenin. 
>>I don't subscribe to the view of Stalin's exceptionalism, i.e. the view that 
>>Stalin was somehow an anomaly in the development of Communism/Marxism.<<

Exceptionalism presumes linguistic realism, i.e., that the word "communist" is 
real. However, "communism" is a name for a variety of views - some more 
consistent with Marx's views than others. There is no such *thing* as a 
communist. It is a category or social construction.

>>If we engage in partisan politics we will find ourselves as de facto allies 
>>with all sorts of unsavoury rabble. We have to bear in mind the old folk 
>>saying, "When you sup with the devil make sure you bring a long spoon."<<

However, I explicitly said, Ian, that I am not advocating involvement in 
partisan politics. Marxism, like communism, is not a thing. My construction of 
Marxism (so-called post-Marxism) is obviously not what you have in your head.

>>I get the impression you subscribe to the notion that all of Communism's 
>>evils can be placed at Stalin's door. Stalin simply followed in Lenin's 
>>footsteps; both based themselves on Marx's severely flawed social and 
>>historical analysis.<<

Followed in Lenin's footsteps???

>>Not really. Stalin simply put into practice Marx's dictatorship of the 
>>proletariat and his dictum that violence [force] is the midwife of history. 
>>(Das Kapital)<<

Impossible. Marx's dictatorship of the proletariat (socialism) was a, um, 
dictatorship of the *proletariat*. Russia was never a capitalist state (really 
more feudal) and, therefore, could not have a dictatorship of the proletariat. 
The Soviet Union, during and after Stalin, was a dictatorship of the 
intelligentsia.

>>Yes, I have always understood that - but nonetheless I would point out that 
>>this usage is confusing and easily leads to misunderstanding.<<

It is not c

RE: Baha'i Liberation "Theology" ((long quote))

2005-10-04 Thread Ian Kluge
Dear Mark, 

You ask:

"Does unity of thought and action require that everyone has the same views
and uses the same approaches? That is not my understanding of the concept."

Working effectively for a cause requires (a) working for the same ultimate
goals, (b) working for proximate goals that, at the very least, do not
contradict each other, (c) co-ordinating efforts i.e. adopting methodologies
that harmonise and do not work at cross-purposes and (d) setting aside a lot
of personal preferences. All this used to be called "party discipline" in
the Communist parties. 

You write: 

"Liberation theology" is just a term, and it depends on how you define it.
However, if you are saying that liberation from injustice, oppression,
racism, sexism, militant nationalism, corporate capitalism, etc. are
important themes in the Baha'i primary sources, including the letters by
(and on behalf of) the Universal House of Justice, I would agree with you."

That's a pretty good list though I think Shoghi Effendi talks about
"unbridled capitalism" rather than "corporate capitalism." I would also add
Communism. The Guardian calls it one of the "three false gods" (The Promised
Day is Come 113) and says, 

"The chief idols in the desecrated temple of mankind are none other than the
triple gods of Nationalism, Racialism and *Communism*, at whose altars
governments and peoples, whether democratic or totalitarian, at peace or at
war, of the East or of the West, Christian or Islamic, are, in various forms
and in different degrees, now worshiping." (The Promised Day is Come 113) 

You write:

"As I said earlier in this thread, I am not advocating any form of partisan
political activity. On the other hand, I would not want to place communists
(at least Trotskyites) in the same category as fascists and extreme
nationalists." 

IAN:

Why not? Trotsky was a thoroughly unpleasant piece of baggage both as a man
and in his ideas. I'm not sure why you admire him so much. The following is
by Michael Lynch in the History Review, 1999) 

" Was  Trotskyism a humane alternative to Stalinism?

There are still those who regard Trotsky as the Communist with the human
touch, the man who would have led the Russian Revolution towards democratic
socialism. But this interpretation is hard to sustain in the face of the
record of his fanatical behaviour as a Soviet commissar between 1917 and
1921. In the 1990s, Dmitri Volkogonov, the Russian biographer of Lenin,
Stalin and Trotsky, produced evidence from previously unexamined Russian
state papers to show that Lenin and Trotsky had worked together on a
deliberate policy of terror that precisely foreshadowed the later Stalinist
tyranny. Stalinism, therefore, was not a reversal of Leninism but a
continuation of it. Trotsky's enforced militarisation of labour, his
crushing of the trade unions, the extreme methods he used to discipline the
Red Army, his savagery against the Kronstadt rebels in 1921, and his
ferocity towards the Russian peasantry undermine the romantic image of him
as `the angel of enlightenment' in an otherwise cruel world.

In exile, Trotsky denounced Stalinism not because it was brutal but because
it was brutal for the wrong reasons. All the signs were that, had Trotsky
had the opportunity to enforce his concept of revolution on the Bolshevik
state, he would have used very similar means to those that Stalin employed.
Absolute authority was the necessary requirement of Bolshevik rule. Long
before Stalin imposed himself on the Party, Trotsky had supported Lenin in
the creation of the one-party totalitarian state, with its secret police,
show trials, and prison camps. Trotsky believed unashamedly in state
terror." Micheal Lynch, "Trotsky: Angel of Enlightenment or Frustrated
Dictator?" (Michael Lynch, "History Review" 1999)

Some Trotksy quotes: (1) "Murder, lies and treachery are immoral and
shameful if they are harmful to  the cause of the proletarian revolution;
these same lies, treachery and  murder are moral and laudable if they serve
this revolution.'

(2) "The road to socialism lies through the highest concentration of state 
 power. Like a light bulb which, before extinguishing itself, flashes 
 brightly, so the state prior to its disappearance takes the form of the 
 dictatorship of the proletariat, i.e. of the most pitiless state, which 
 coercively controls the life of the citizens in all its aspects.'"

Nothing about Trotsky or his career suggests that he is a suitable role
model or intellectual partner for Baha'is. 

You write:  

"I also believe that corporate capitalism and other forms of (what I would
consider to be) state-sponsored terrorism are much more problematic than
Stalinism (however much I may disagree with Stalin's bastardization of
Marx's views)."

I disagree on both counts. Stalin was the logical outcome of Marx and Lenin.
I don't subscribe to the view of Stalin's exceptionalism, i.e. the view that
Stalin was somehow an anomaly in the development of Communism/Marxism. 

RE: Baha'i Liberation "Theology" ((long quote))

2005-10-04 Thread Mark A. Foster
Susan,

At 11:08 PM 10/3/2005, you wrote:
>>It was the UFW that finally succeeded in organizing most of the grape 
>>pickers.<<

They did ultimately, yes.

>>They got started in the 60's but it was largely thanks to the boycott that 
>>they were finally successful, especially with Gallo.<< 

That was what my friend Stephanie Erickson believed, too. ;-) She and I were 
the two most active members of our chapter of the STC (in 7th grade). I never 
thought so. I always attributed it to media publicity. In 1968-1969 (?), 
Stephanie and I organized several demonstrations in front of a local 
supermarket which sold the grapes. (About a year later, someone burned the 
place down. They eventually found the perpetrator. Fortunately, he had nothing 
to do with us, but he was my next-door neighbor's son!)

>>I went without eating grapes for nearly a decade during that period.<<

I probably lasted about half that time, and I also persuaded my parents to do 
it for a while. However, they did purchase California wine, which I thought 
kind of defeated the purpose.

>>When the UFW tried to organize workers in other agricultural sector the 
>>Teamsters moved in and signed sweetheart contracts with the management. I 
>>worked for a frozen food packing company and ended up quitting rather than 
>>join the Teamsters. In my mind, that was like joining the Mafia!<<

They did seem to have had those connections. 

Via moderna, Mark A. Foster . http://markfoster.net
... [a] word is ... a universal. - William of Ockham
Structurization Tech: http://tech.structurization.com 



 
 
The information contained in this e-mail and any attachments thereto ("e-mail") 
is sent by the Johnson County Community College ("JCCC") and is intended to be 
confidential and for the use of only the individual or entity named above. The 
information may be protected by federal and state privacy and disclosures acts 
or other legal rules. If the reader of this message is not the intended 
recipient, you are notified that retention, dissemination, distribution or 
copying of this e-mail is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail 
in error please immediately notify JCCC by email reply and immediately and 
permanently delete this e-mail message and any attachments thereto. Thank you.
 
 
__
 

You are subscribed to Baha'i Studies as: mailto:archive@mail-archive.com
Unsubscribe: send a blank email to mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subscribe: send subscribe bahai-st in the message body to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subscribe: http://list.jccc.edu:8080/read/all_forums/subscribe?name=bahai-st
Baha'i Studies is available through the following:
Mail - mailto:bahai-st@list.jccc.edu
Web - http://list.jccc.edu:8080/read/?forum=bahai-st
News - news://list.jccc.edu/bahai-st
Public - http://www.escribe.com/religion/bahaist
Old Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.net
New Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.edu


RE: Baha'i Liberation "Theology" ((long quote))

2005-10-03 Thread Susan Maneck
>>I didn't know you were referring to the UFW.
 That union was started in the early to mid 60s - before the petitions even
got started. I thought you meant the Teamsters. Of course, the UFW and the
Teamsters never really got along.<<

Dear Mark,

It was the UFW that finally succeeded in organizing most of the grape
pickers. They got started in the 60's but it was largely thanks to the
boycott that they were finally successful, especially with Gallo. I went
without eating grapes for nearly a decade during that period. When the UFW
tried to organize workers in other agricultural sector the Teamsters moved
in and signed sweetheart contracts with the management. I worked for a
frozen food packing company and ended up quitting rather than join the
Teamsters. In my mind, that was like joining the Mafia!

warmest, Susan



 
 
The information contained in this e-mail and any attachments thereto ("e-mail") 
is sent by the Johnson County Community College ("JCCC") and is intended to be 
confidential and for the use of only the individual or entity named above. The 
information may be protected by federal and state privacy and disclosures acts 
or other legal rules. If the reader of this message is not the intended 
recipient, you are notified that retention, dissemination, distribution or 
copying of this e-mail is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail 
in error please immediately notify JCCC by email reply and immediately and 
permanently delete this e-mail message and any attachments thereto. Thank you.
 
 
__
 

You are subscribed to Baha'i Studies as: mailto:archive@mail-archive.com
Unsubscribe: send a blank email to mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subscribe: send subscribe bahai-st in the message body to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subscribe: http://list.jccc.edu:8080/read/all_forums/subscribe?name=bahai-st
Baha'i Studies is available through the following:
Mail - mailto:bahai-st@list.jccc.edu
Web - http://list.jccc.edu:8080/read/?forum=bahai-st
News - news://list.jccc.edu/bahai-st
Public - http://www.escribe.com/religion/bahaist
Old Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.net
New Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.edu


RE: Baha'i Liberation "Theology" ((long quote))

2005-10-03 Thread Mark A. Foster
Hi, Susan,

At 10:17 PM 10/3/2005, you wrote:
>>The United Farmworkers was a pretty home-grown movement. It took years forthe 
>>AFL-CIO to even recognize them. And the Teamsters only signed sweetheart 
>>contracts.<<

>>I didn't know you were referring to the UFW. That union was started in the 
>>early to mid 60s - before the petitions even got started. I thought you meant 
>>the Teamsters. Of course, the UFW and the Teamsters never really got along.<<

Via moderna, Mark A. Foster . http://markfoster.net
... [a] word is ... a universal. - William of Ockham
Structurization Tech: http://tech.structurization.com 



 
 
The information contained in this e-mail and any attachments thereto ("e-mail") 
is sent by the Johnson County Community College ("JCCC") and is intended to be 
confidential and for the use of only the individual or entity named above. The 
information may be protected by federal and state privacy and disclosures acts 
or other legal rules. If the reader of this message is not the intended 
recipient, you are notified that retention, dissemination, distribution or 
copying of this e-mail is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail 
in error please immediately notify JCCC by email reply and immediately and 
permanently delete this e-mail message and any attachments thereto. Thank you.
 
 
__
 

You are subscribed to Baha'i Studies as: mailto:archive@mail-archive.com
Unsubscribe: send a blank email to mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subscribe: send subscribe bahai-st in the message body to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subscribe: http://list.jccc.edu:8080/read/all_forums/subscribe?name=bahai-st
Baha'i Studies is available through the following:
Mail - mailto:bahai-st@list.jccc.edu
Web - http://list.jccc.edu:8080/read/?forum=bahai-st
News - news://list.jccc.edu/bahai-st
Public - http://www.escribe.com/religion/bahaist
Old Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.net
New Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.edu


RE: Baha'i Liberation "Theology" ((long quote))

2005-10-03 Thread Susan Maneck
"I agree, but do you think it was a result of the boycotts? As I see it, it
was the media focus which led to unions becoming interested in the
population."

Dear Mark,

The United Farmworkers was a pretty home-grown movement. It took years for
the AFL-CIO to even recognize them. And the Teamsters only signed sweetheart
contracts.

warmest, Susan



 
 
The information contained in this e-mail and any attachments thereto ("e-mail") 
is sent by the Johnson County Community College ("JCCC") and is intended to be 
confidential and for the use of only the individual or entity named above. The 
information may be protected by federal and state privacy and disclosures acts 
or other legal rules. If the reader of this message is not the intended 
recipient, you are notified that retention, dissemination, distribution or 
copying of this e-mail is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail 
in error please immediately notify JCCC by email reply and immediately and 
permanently delete this e-mail message and any attachments thereto. Thank you.
 
 
__
 

You are subscribed to Baha'i Studies as: mailto:archive@mail-archive.com
Unsubscribe: send a blank email to mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subscribe: send subscribe bahai-st in the message body to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subscribe: http://list.jccc.edu:8080/read/all_forums/subscribe?name=bahai-st
Baha'i Studies is available through the following:
Mail - mailto:bahai-st@list.jccc.edu
Web - http://list.jccc.edu:8080/read/?forum=bahai-st
News - news://list.jccc.edu/bahai-st
Public - http://www.escribe.com/religion/bahaist
Old Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.net
New Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.edu


RE: Baha'i Liberation "Theology" ((long quote))

2005-10-03 Thread Mark A. Foster
Susan,

At 09:57 PM 10/3/2005, you wrote:
>>Yeah, but Gallo was forced to unionize. That was no small victory.<<

I agree, but do you think it was a result of the boycotts? As I see it, it was 
the media focus which led to unions becoming interested in the population.

Via moderna, Mark A. Foster . http://markfoster.net
... [a] word is ... a universal. - William of Ockham
Structurization Tech: http://tech.structurization.com 



 
 
The information contained in this e-mail and any attachments thereto ("e-mail") 
is sent by the Johnson County Community College ("JCCC") and is intended to be 
confidential and for the use of only the individual or entity named above. The 
information may be protected by federal and state privacy and disclosures acts 
or other legal rules. If the reader of this message is not the intended 
recipient, you are notified that retention, dissemination, distribution or 
copying of this e-mail is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail 
in error please immediately notify JCCC by email reply and immediately and 
permanently delete this e-mail message and any attachments thereto. Thank you.
 
 
__
 

You are subscribed to Baha'i Studies as: mailto:archive@mail-archive.com
Unsubscribe: send a blank email to mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subscribe: send subscribe bahai-st in the message body to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subscribe: http://list.jccc.edu:8080/read/all_forums/subscribe?name=bahai-st
Baha'i Studies is available through the following:
Mail - mailto:bahai-st@list.jccc.edu
Web - http://list.jccc.edu:8080/read/?forum=bahai-st
News - news://list.jccc.edu/bahai-st
Public - http://www.escribe.com/religion/bahaist
Old Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.net
New Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.edu


RE: Baha'i Liberation "Theology" ((long quote))

2005-10-03 Thread Mark A. Foster
Susan,

At 09:57 PM 10/3/2005, you wrote:
>>They were pretty effective against South Africa.<<

That is what some governments claimed. Personally, I did not buy it. South 
Africa abandoned Apartheid because of popular dissent; and the support for it 
among whites had declined, as well. It was, in part, this lack of support among 
the Afrikaaners which contributed to the rise of Neo-Nazi groups in the country.

Via moderna, Mark A. Foster . http://markfoster.net
... [a] word is ... a universal. - William of Ockham
Structurization Tech: http://tech.structurization.com 



 
 
The information contained in this e-mail and any attachments thereto ("e-mail") 
is sent by the Johnson County Community College ("JCCC") and is intended to be 
confidential and for the use of only the individual or entity named above. The 
information may be protected by federal and state privacy and disclosures acts 
or other legal rules. If the reader of this message is not the intended 
recipient, you are notified that retention, dissemination, distribution or 
copying of this e-mail is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail 
in error please immediately notify JCCC by email reply and immediately and 
permanently delete this e-mail message and any attachments thereto. Thank you.
 
 
__
 

You are subscribed to Baha'i Studies as: mailto:archive@mail-archive.com
Unsubscribe: send a blank email to mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subscribe: send subscribe bahai-st in the message body to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subscribe: http://list.jccc.edu:8080/read/all_forums/subscribe?name=bahai-st
Baha'i Studies is available through the following:
Mail - mailto:bahai-st@list.jccc.edu
Web - http://list.jccc.edu:8080/read/?forum=bahai-st
News - news://list.jccc.edu/bahai-st
Public - http://www.escribe.com/religion/bahaist
Old Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.net
New Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.edu


RE: Baha'i Liberation "Theology" ((long quote))

2005-10-03 Thread Susan Maneck
"Sure, but boycotts are rarely effective."

Dear Mark,

They were pretty effective against South Africa.


"Back in the late 60s, when I was a member my school's chapter of the
Students' Democratic Coalition (affiliated with the SDS), I handed out
petitions to boycott California grapes. A lot of us participated, and, all
over the country, we got tens of thousands of returned petitions.

Well, the economic abuse of migrant workers is still going on."

Yeah, but Gallo was forced to unionize. That was no small victory.

warmest, Susan



 
 
The information contained in this e-mail and any attachments thereto ("e-mail") 
is sent by the Johnson County Community College ("JCCC") and is intended to be 
confidential and for the use of only the individual or entity named above. The 
information may be protected by federal and state privacy and disclosures acts 
or other legal rules. If the reader of this message is not the intended 
recipient, you are notified that retention, dissemination, distribution or 
copying of this e-mail is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail 
in error please immediately notify JCCC by email reply and immediately and 
permanently delete this e-mail message and any attachments thereto. Thank you.
 
 
__
 

You are subscribed to Baha'i Studies as: mailto:archive@mail-archive.com
Unsubscribe: send a blank email to mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subscribe: send subscribe bahai-st in the message body to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subscribe: http://list.jccc.edu:8080/read/all_forums/subscribe?name=bahai-st
Baha'i Studies is available through the following:
Mail - mailto:bahai-st@list.jccc.edu
Web - http://list.jccc.edu:8080/read/?forum=bahai-st
News - news://list.jccc.edu/bahai-st
Public - http://www.escribe.com/religion/bahaist
Old Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.net
New Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.edu


RE: Baha'i Liberation "Theology" ((long quote))

2005-10-03 Thread Mark A. Foster
Susan,

At 09:06 PM 10/3/2005, you wrote:
>>Well, as I said Baha'is are free to join in boycotts of the worst 
>>multi-national offenders. And one doesn't even have to get involved in 
>>politics to do that.<<

Sure, but boycotts are rarely effective. Most people seem to have a short 
attention span.

Back in the late 60s, when I was a member my school's chapter of the Students' 
Democratic Coalition (affiliated with the SDS), I handed out petitions to 
boycott California grapes. A lot of us participated, and, all over the country, 
we got tens of thousands of returned petitions. 

Well, the economic abuse of migrant workers is still going on. Unfortunately, 
comparing social problems to clothing, we have what one writer called "a 
designer social consciousness." The problems didn't go away, but we did.

Via moderna, Mark A. Foster . http://markfoster.net
... [a] word is ... a universal. - William of Ockham
Structurization Tech: http://tech.structurization.com 



 
 
The information contained in this e-mail and any attachments thereto ("e-mail") 
is sent by the Johnson County Community College ("JCCC") and is intended to be 
confidential and for the use of only the individual or entity named above. The 
information may be protected by federal and state privacy and disclosures acts 
or other legal rules. If the reader of this message is not the intended 
recipient, you are notified that retention, dissemination, distribution or 
copying of this e-mail is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail 
in error please immediately notify JCCC by email reply and immediately and 
permanently delete this e-mail message and any attachments thereto. Thank you.
 
 
__
 

You are subscribed to Baha'i Studies as: mailto:archive@mail-archive.com
Unsubscribe: send a blank email to mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subscribe: send subscribe bahai-st in the message body to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subscribe: http://list.jccc.edu:8080/read/all_forums/subscribe?name=bahai-st
Baha'i Studies is available through the following:
Mail - mailto:bahai-st@list.jccc.edu
Web - http://list.jccc.edu:8080/read/?forum=bahai-st
News - news://list.jccc.edu/bahai-st
Public - http://www.escribe.com/religion/bahaist
Old Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.net
New Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.edu


RE: Baha'i Liberation "Theology" ((long quote))

2005-10-03 Thread Susan Maneck
"Importers, such as the U.S., have little incentive to protest; and any
outrage is drowned out by the demand for cheaper goods"

Dear Mark,

Well, as I said Baha'is are free to join in boycotts of the worst
multi-national offenders. And one doesn't even have to get involved in
politics to do that.

warmest, Susan



 
 
The information contained in this e-mail and any attachments thereto ("e-mail") 
is sent by the Johnson County Community College ("JCCC") and is intended to be 
confidential and for the use of only the individual or entity named above. The 
information may be protected by federal and state privacy and disclosures acts 
or other legal rules. If the reader of this message is not the intended 
recipient, you are notified that retention, dissemination, distribution or 
copying of this e-mail is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail 
in error please immediately notify JCCC by email reply and immediately and 
permanently delete this e-mail message and any attachments thereto. Thank you.
 
 
__
 

You are subscribed to Baha'i Studies as: mailto:archive@mail-archive.com
Unsubscribe: send a blank email to mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subscribe: send subscribe bahai-st in the message body to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subscribe: http://list.jccc.edu:8080/read/all_forums/subscribe?name=bahai-st
Baha'i Studies is available through the following:
Mail - mailto:bahai-st@list.jccc.edu
Web - http://list.jccc.edu:8080/read/?forum=bahai-st
News - news://list.jccc.edu/bahai-st
Public - http://www.escribe.com/religion/bahaist
Old Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.net
New Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.edu


RE: Baha'i Liberation "Theology" ((long quote))

2005-10-03 Thread Mark A. Foster
Susan,

At 07:34 PM 10/3/2005, you wrote:
>>It can be if there is sufficient enforcement. And one of the ways to enforce 
>>it is to outlaw the import of any goods produced by child labor. If you do 
>>that, then adults will have to be hired which raises the wages and when adult 
>>wages are raised, children don't have to work.<<

If there are any new "false gods," they would probably include the WTO and 
globalization. Importers, such as the U.S., have little incentive to protest; 
and any outrage is drowned out by the demand for cheaper goods, 

Via moderna, Mark A. Foster . http://markfoster.net
... [a] word is ... a universal. - William of Ockham
Structurization Tech: http://tech.structurization.com 



 
 
The information contained in this e-mail and any attachments thereto ("e-mail") 
is sent by the Johnson County Community College ("JCCC") and is intended to be 
confidential and for the use of only the individual or entity named above. The 
information may be protected by federal and state privacy and disclosures acts 
or other legal rules. If the reader of this message is not the intended 
recipient, you are notified that retention, dissemination, distribution or 
copying of this e-mail is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail 
in error please immediately notify JCCC by email reply and immediately and 
permanently delete this e-mail message and any attachments thereto. Thank you.
 
 
__
 

You are subscribed to Baha'i Studies as: mailto:archive@mail-archive.com
Unsubscribe: send a blank email to mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subscribe: send subscribe bahai-st in the message body to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subscribe: http://list.jccc.edu:8080/read/all_forums/subscribe?name=bahai-st
Baha'i Studies is available through the following:
Mail - mailto:bahai-st@list.jccc.edu
Web - http://list.jccc.edu:8080/read/?forum=bahai-st
News - news://list.jccc.edu/bahai-st
Public - http://www.escribe.com/religion/bahaist
Old Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.net
New Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.edu


RE: Baha'i Liberation "Theology" ((long quote))

2005-10-03 Thread Susan Maneck
"The issue is *how* to eliminate child labor. It obviously cannot be
eradicated merely by outlawing it."

Dear Mark,

It can be if there is sufficient enforcement. And one of the ways to enforce
it is to outlaw the import of any goods produced by child labor. If you do
that, then adults will have to be hired which raises the wages and when
adult wages are raised, children don't have to work.

warmest, Susan



 
 
The information contained in this e-mail and any attachments thereto ("e-mail") 
is sent by the Johnson County Community College ("JCCC") and is intended to be 
confidential and for the use of only the individual or entity named above. The 
information may be protected by federal and state privacy and disclosures acts 
or other legal rules. If the reader of this message is not the intended 
recipient, you are notified that retention, dissemination, distribution or 
copying of this e-mail is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail 
in error please immediately notify JCCC by email reply and immediately and 
permanently delete this e-mail message and any attachments thereto. Thank you.
 
 
__
 

You are subscribed to Baha'i Studies as: mailto:archive@mail-archive.com
Unsubscribe: send a blank email to mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subscribe: send subscribe bahai-st in the message body to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subscribe: http://list.jccc.edu:8080/read/all_forums/subscribe?name=bahai-st
Baha'i Studies is available through the following:
Mail - mailto:bahai-st@list.jccc.edu
Web - http://list.jccc.edu:8080/read/?forum=bahai-st
News - news://list.jccc.edu/bahai-st
Public - http://www.escribe.com/religion/bahaist
Old Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.net
New Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.edu


RE: Baha'i Liberation "Theology" ((long quote))

2005-10-03 Thread Mark A. Foster
Susan,

At 06:56 PM 10/3/2005, you wrote:
>>Those classes which find it necessary to have their children work are rarely 
>>those who have access to a college education in any case.<<

They are the underclass, and child labor is one of the oppressive residues of 
the classism (the ideology) in those societies. As full-time child laborers 
they have almost no hope at all of escaping their predicament.  

The issue is *how* to eliminate child labor. It obviously cannot be eradicated 
merely by outlawing it. The caste-based modes of social stratification which 
characterize both China and India need to be adjusted and corrected. 

Via moderna, Mark A. Foster . http://markfoster.net
... [a] word is ... a universal. - William of Ockham
Structurization Tech: http://tech.structurization.com 



 
 
The information contained in this e-mail and any attachments thereto ("e-mail") 
is sent by the Johnson County Community College ("JCCC") and is intended to be 
confidential and for the use of only the individual or entity named above. The 
information may be protected by federal and state privacy and disclosures acts 
or other legal rules. If the reader of this message is not the intended 
recipient, you are notified that retention, dissemination, distribution or 
copying of this e-mail is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail 
in error please immediately notify JCCC by email reply and immediately and 
permanently delete this e-mail message and any attachments thereto. Thank you.
 
 
__
 

You are subscribed to Baha'i Studies as: mailto:archive@mail-archive.com
Unsubscribe: send a blank email to mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subscribe: send subscribe bahai-st in the message body to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subscribe: http://list.jccc.edu:8080/read/all_forums/subscribe?name=bahai-st
Baha'i Studies is available through the following:
Mail - mailto:bahai-st@list.jccc.edu
Web - http://list.jccc.edu:8080/read/?forum=bahai-st
News - news://list.jccc.edu/bahai-st
Public - http://www.escribe.com/religion/bahaist
Old Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.net
New Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.edu


RE: Baha'i Liberation "Theology" ((long quote))

2005-10-03 Thread Susan Maneck
"True, but some of those societies are places like China and India.
Receiving a baccalaureate is, in some ways, even more important in these two
countries than in the U.S. or Western Europe; and child labor, by keeping
people mired in the underclass, makes that unlikely."

Dear Mark,

Those classes which find it necessary to have their children work are rarely
those who have access to a college education in any case.

warmest, Susan



 
 
The information contained in this e-mail and any attachments thereto ("e-mail") 
is sent by the Johnson County Community College ("JCCC") and is intended to be 
confidential and for the use of only the individual or entity named above. The 
information may be protected by federal and state privacy and disclosures acts 
or other legal rules. If the reader of this message is not the intended 
recipient, you are notified that retention, dissemination, distribution or 
copying of this e-mail is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail 
in error please immediately notify JCCC by email reply and immediately and 
permanently delete this e-mail message and any attachments thereto. Thank you.
 
 
__
 

You are subscribed to Baha'i Studies as: mailto:archive@mail-archive.com
Unsubscribe: send a blank email to mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subscribe: send subscribe bahai-st in the message body to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subscribe: http://list.jccc.edu:8080/read/all_forums/subscribe?name=bahai-st
Baha'i Studies is available through the following:
Mail - mailto:bahai-st@list.jccc.edu
Web - http://list.jccc.edu:8080/read/?forum=bahai-st
News - news://list.jccc.edu/bahai-st
Public - http://www.escribe.com/religion/bahaist
Old Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.net
New Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.edu


RE: Baha'i Liberation "Theology" ((long quote))

2005-10-03 Thread Mark A. Foster
Ian,

At 05:33 PM 10/3/2005, you wrote:
>>If a so-called 'Baha'i liberation theology' cannot provide or exemplify unity 
>>of thought and action, it will soon become part of the problem that 
>>Baha'u'llah came to solve rather than a solution.<<

Does unity of thought and action require that everyone has the same views and 
uses the same approaches? That is not my understanding of the concept.

>>Perhaps it is better to realise that the Baha'i Faith *is* a liberation 
>>theology as it stands. To be sure, this aspect needs further explication, but 
>>the foundations are already in the Writings and the guidance of the Universal 
>>House of Justice.<<

"Liberation theology" is just a term, and it depends on how you define it. 
However, if you are saying that liberation from injustice, oppression, racism, 
sexism, militant nationalism, corporate capitalism, etc. are important themes 
in the Baha'i primary sources, including the letters by (and on behalf of) the 
Universal House of Justice, I would agree with you.

>>There are certainly 'sides' in some of the activities in which a Baha'i 
>>liberation theology could be involved. Like it or not, Baha'i  activists 
>>would find themselves 'marching' side-by-side with - and providing tacit 
>>support and/or legitimacy to -  anarchists both violent and non-violent, 
>>various kinds of communists, extreme nationalists and fascists and  worse - 
>>as has happened at anti-globalization marches and other kinds of 
>>demonstrations for various causes.<< 

As I said earlier in this thread, I am not advocating any form of partisan 
political activity. On the other hand, I would not want to place communists (at 
least Trotskyites) in the same category as fascists and extreme nationalists. 

I also believe that corporate capitalism and other forms of (what I would 
consider to be) state-sponsored terrorism are much more problematic than 
Stalinism (however much I may disagree with Stalin's bastardization of Marx's 
views).

>>We may not want to be identified with such people but if we walk with them we 
>>will be.<<

I am not sure where you got the idea that I am suggesting what you wrote.

>>Whether you or anyone else thinks Marxism hasn't been discredited doesn' 
>>really matter. The facts are clear: with the exception of Cuba (whose 
>>national anthem is "Row, row, row your boat [to Miami]"), all countries that 
>>tried Marxism as the basis of society and economics either have abandoned it 
>>or are in the process of doing so.<<

I was no great supporter of the Stalinist and post-Stalinist USSR or of 
post-Maoist China (even prior to its consolidation into the WTO). However, I 
frankly see corporate capitalism and its state sponsors to be much more 
dangerous. At least some of them, both state and corporate actors, have, in the 
last 4 years, become involved in two destructive wars in Asia, and I feel I 
have good reason to be concerned over the future.

>>Their experience and their actions speak louder than any theoretical flights 
>>of fancy by those who have never experienced Marxism in real life.<<

Well, Stalinism is Stalinism, not Marxism.

>>As for the notion that there are many Baha'i faiths, we have already 
>>discussed this once before and I can only repeat my position: there is only 
>>one Baha'i Faith and many understandings/versions of it.<< 

IMO, you are responding to the terminology as *you*, not as I, would use it. 
When I say there are many Baha'i faiths (small "f"), it is precisely the "many 
understandings/versions of it" that I have in mind.

>>IOW, the Writings embody the perfect model of the Baha'i Faith and 
>>(ultimately) the Universal House of Justice ensures that all local and 
>>personal versions harmonise with that perfect model. Calling these local and 
>>individual versions Baha'i faiths (with a small 'f') simply confuses the 
>>issue.<<

I may be confusing in the contexts of some "Baha'i faiths," but not in my own. 
;-) 

Via moderna, Mark A. Foster . http://markfoster.net
... [a] word is ... a universal. - William of Ockham
Structurization Tech: http://tech.structurization.com 



 
 
The information contained in this e-mail and any attachments thereto ("e-mail") 
is sent by the Johnson County Community College ("JCCC") and is intended to be 
confidential and for the use of only the individual or entity named above. The 
information may be protected by federal and state privacy and disclosures acts 
or other legal rules. If the reader of this message is not the intended 
recipient, you are notified that retention, dissemination, distribution or 
copying of this e-mail is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail 
in error please immediately notify JCCC by email reply and immediately and 
permanently delete this e-mail message and any attachments thereto. Thank you.
 
 
__
 

You are subscribed to Baha'i Studies as: mailto:archive@mail-archive.com
Unsubscribe: send a blank email t

RE: Baha'i Liberation "Theology" ((long quote))

2005-10-03 Thread Ian Kluge
Dear Mark, 

If a so-called 'Baha'i liberation theology' cannot provide or exemplify
unity of thought and action, it will soon become part of the problem that
Baha'u'llah came to solve rather than a solution. 

Perhaps it is better to realise that the Baha'i Faith *is* a liberation
theology as it stands. To be sure, this aspect needs further explication,
but the foundations are already in the Writings and the guidance of the
Universal House of Justice. 

There are certainly 'sides' in some of the activities in which a Baha'i
liberation theology could be involved. Like it or not, Baha'i  activists
would find themselves 'marching' side-by-side with - and providing tacit
support and/or legitimacy to -  anarchists both violent and non-violent,
various kinds of communists, extreme nationalists and fascists and  worse -
as has happened at anti-globalization marches and other kinds of
demonstrations for various causes. We may not want to be identified with
such people but if we walk with them we will be. 

Whether you or anyone else thinks Marxism hasn't been discredited doesn't
really matter. The facts are clear: with the exception of Cuba (whose
national anthem is "Row, row, row your boat [to Miami]"), all countries that
tried Marxism as the basis of society and economics either have abandoned it
or are in the process of doing so. Their experience and their actions speak
louder than any theoretical flights of fancy by those who have never
experienced Marxism in real life.  

As for the notion that there are many Baha'i faiths, we have already
discussed this once before and I can only repeat my position: there is only
one Baha'i Faith and many understandings/versions of it. IOW, the Writings
embody the perfect model of the Baha'i Faith and (ultimately) the Universal
House of Justice ensures that all local and personal versions harmonise with
that perfect model. Calling these local and individual versions Baha'i
faiths (with a small 'f') simply confuses the issue. 

Best wishes,

Ian Kluge 



-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mark A. Foster
Sent: October 3, 2005 1:34 PM
To: Baha'i Studies
Subject: RE: Baha'i Liberation "Theology" ((long quote))

Ian,

At 11:18 AM 10/3/2005, you wrote:
>>In the exchanges already seen, we observe the main problem in establishing
a Baha'i liberation theology: disunity.<<

I am not sure if that can be a measure of a useful construction. People,
including Baha'is, disagree on all sorts of things. 

Personally, I like coming up with different constructions, thought
experiments, and language games - then seeing where they lead. I do that
both in sociology and in the Baha'i Faith. I think that this practice can be
productive - as long as one does not become overly attached to one's ideas
and is open to whatever evidence may present itself.

>>There is simply no agreement on what constitutes a problem - and more
importantly, by what means to seek a solution. Moreover, we also have the
problems caused by those who are - supposedly - on 'our side' but whose
presence or 'support' weakens whatever cause we work for.<<

I don't see it as a "side." I see it as the construction of a "Baha'i faith"
(lower-case "f"), i.e., as religious ecology. I explain this idea in one of
my papers:

"Numerous approaches to scriptural hermeneutics have been developed. The
revealed Word, the transmission of the knowledge of God, might be compared
with a driver; historicism, the Prophetic ecology of the dialectical God-Man
and His Revelation situated in their original cultural, historical, bodily,
and linguistic contexts, to the vehicle; and religous ecology (or cultural
syncretism), the recontextualizations of the revealed Word into multiple
normative structurizations, to the destination.
"A distinction can, therefore, be drawn between religion as divine
Revelation and religion as social construction. The first, Prophetic
ecology, is the proclamation of the Word of God, the Logos, or the Teachings
of an embodied Messenger to a peculiarized cultural, historical, and
physical audience. The second, designated as religious ecology, is a
fundamentally human phenomenon.
"From the standpoint of religious ecology, revealed religions do not
operate in a vacuum. Rather, given the dynamic interplay between an original
Revelation and the individuals and groups which receive it, one may speak of
multiple Judaisms, Buddhisms, Christianities, Islams, Bahá'í faiths, etc.
"Ergo, the Bahá'í faith in Iran is not precisely the Bahá'í faith in the
United States. In the latter, the Bahá'í Faith has been commingled, among
diverse persons and groups, with elements of Protestantism, the New Age

RE: Baha'i Liberation "Theology" ((long quote))

2005-10-03 Thread Mark A. Foster
Ian,

At 11:18 AM 10/3/2005, you wrote:
>>In the exchanges already seen, we observe the main problem in establishing a 
>>Baha'i liberation theology: disunity.<<

I am not sure if that can be a measure of a useful construction. People, 
including Baha'is, disagree on all sorts of things. 

Personally, I like coming up with different constructions, thought experiments, 
and language games - then seeing where they lead. I do that both in sociology 
and in the Baha'i Faith. I think that this practice can be productive - as long 
as one does not become overly attached to one's ideas and is open to whatever 
evidence may present itself.

>>There is simply no agreement on what constitutes a problem - and more 
>>importantly, by what means to seek a solution. Moreover, we also have the 
>>problems caused by those who are - supposedly - on 'our side' but whose 
>>presence or 'support' weakens whatever cause we work for.<<

I don't see it as a "side." I see it as the construction of a "Baha'i faith" 
(lower-case "f"), i.e., as religious ecology. I explain this idea in one of my 
papers:

"Numerous approaches to scriptural hermeneutics have been developed. The 
revealed Word, the transmission of the knowledge of God, might be compared with 
a driver; historicism, the Prophetic ecology of the dialectical God-Man and His 
Revelation situated in their original cultural, historical, bodily, and 
linguistic contexts, to the vehicle; and religous ecology (or cultural 
syncretism), the recontextualizations of the revealed Word into multiple 
normative structurizations, to the destination.
"A distinction can, therefore, be drawn between religion as divine 
Revelation and religion as social construction. The first, Prophetic ecology, 
is the proclamation of the Word of God, the Logos, or the Teachings of an 
embodied Messenger to a peculiarized cultural, historical, and physical 
audience. The second, designated as religious ecology, is a fundamentally human 
phenomenon.
"From the standpoint of religious ecology, revealed religions do not 
operate in a vacuum. Rather, given the dynamic interplay between an original 
Revelation and the individuals and groups which receive it, one may speak of 
multiple Judaisms, Buddhisms, Christianities, Islams, Bahá'í faiths, etc.
"Ergo, the Bahá'í faith in Iran is not precisely the Bahá'í faith in the 
United States. In the latter, the Bahá'í Faith has been commingled, among 
diverse persons and groups, with elements of Protestantism, the New Age 
Movement, New Thought, the Enlightenment project, and other systems of thought. 
While this religious ecology is inevitable, as Bahá'ís refashion their 
understandings of their literature and as their social situations change, their 
Bahá'í faiths will also presumably undergo modification. 
"Acknowledging that narratives are inexact and perspectival (as with the 
Jain doctrine of anakanta), allowing for diverse, even contradictory, divine 
and human reality constructions, one should simultaneously recognize, even 
advocate and celebrate, a radical multidoxy or polydoxy of variegated Bahá'í 
faiths and a similarly radical orthopraxy of covenantal obedience. Indeed, 
heresy (Greek, hairesis) is presented throughout the Christian New Testament, 
not as the benign presence of alternative beliefs, but as the self-willed 
promotion of malignant division."
http://tech.structurization.com/

>>There's also the problem of a much deeper divide, namely the divide between 
>>those who to varying degrees and from varying perspectives still hold to 
>>Marxist analyses of socio-economic situations and those who believe that 
>>Marxism in whatever form is a historically discredited philosophy that in its 
>>programmatic materialism, atheism and belief in force/violence is essentially 
>>incompatible with the Baha'i Writings.<<

I definitely do not think that Marx has been discredited. If anything, the 
value of his historical-dialectical methodology is becoming more evident. 
However, when I referred to a Baha'i liberation theology, I did not mean Marx.

>>Indeed, I would venture to say that the main Baha'i requirements for economic 
>>justice -  such as profit-sharing, abolition (not by force) of the extremes 
>>of wealth and poverty - are compatible with a reformed capitalism, i.e. 
>>compatible with an economic system that actually works. IOW, a Baha'i 
>>liberation theology would repeat the split between revolutionaries and 
>>reformers.<<

The anticipated (local) Houses of Finance (storehouses) are about as 
socialistic as anything I have seen. Given that `Abdu'l-Baha referred both to 
these storehouses and, in _Some Answered Questions_, to the rights of 
capitalists, it seems to me that His perspective would, today, be something 
like democratic socialism. Many democratic socialists have no problem with 
private ownership on the local level, but they want to see the dissolution of 
the corporatocracy and the protection of the workers.

V

RE: Baha'i Liberation "Theology" ((long quote))

2005-10-03 Thread Mark A. Foster
Susan,

At 10:14 AM 10/3/2005, you wrote:
>>True. However, child labor is rarely even an issue in post-industrial 
>>societies. It is in those countries still in the process of industrialization 
>>where it has become a problem.<<

True, but some of those societies are places like China and India. Receiving a 
baccalaureate is, in some ways, even more important in these two countries than 
in the U.S. or Western Europe; and child labor, by keeping people mired in the 
underclass, makes that unlikely.

Via moderna, Mark A. Foster . http://markfoster.net
... [a] word is ... a universal. - William of Ockham
Structurization Tech: http://tech.structurization.com 



 
 
The information contained in this e-mail and any attachments thereto ("e-mail") 
is sent by the Johnson County Community College ("JCCC") and is intended to be 
confidential and for the use of only the individual or entity named above. The 
information may be protected by federal and state privacy and disclosures acts 
or other legal rules. If the reader of this message is not the intended 
recipient, you are notified that retention, dissemination, distribution or 
copying of this e-mail is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail 
in error please immediately notify JCCC by email reply and immediately and 
permanently delete this e-mail message and any attachments thereto. Thank you.
 
 
__
 

You are subscribed to Baha'i Studies as: mailto:archive@mail-archive.com
Unsubscribe: send a blank email to mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subscribe: send subscribe bahai-st in the message body to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subscribe: http://list.jccc.edu:8080/read/all_forums/subscribe?name=bahai-st
Baha'i Studies is available through the following:
Mail - mailto:bahai-st@list.jccc.edu
Web - http://list.jccc.edu:8080/read/?forum=bahai-st
News - news://list.jccc.edu/bahai-st
Public - http://www.escribe.com/religion/bahaist
Old Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.net
New Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.edu


RE: Baha'i Liberation "Theology" ((long quote))

2005-10-03 Thread Ian Kluge
Dear Friends, 

In the exchanges already seen, we observe the main problem in establishing a
Baha'i liberation theology: disunity. There is simply no agreement on what
constitutes a problem - and more importantly, by what means to seek a
solution. Moreover, we also have the problems caused by those who are -
supposedly - on 'our side' but whose presence or 'support' weakens whatever
cause we work for. 

There's also the problem of a much deeper divide, namely the divide between
those who to varying degrees and from varying perspectives still hold to
Marxist analyses of socio-economic situations and those who believe that
Marxism in whatever form is a historically discredited philosophy that in
its programmatic materialism, atheism and belief in force/violence is
essentially incompatible with the Baha'i Writings.  

Indeed, I would venture to say that the main Baha'i requirements for
economic justice -  such as profit-sharing, abolition (not by force)of the
extremes of wealth and poverty - are compatible with a reformed capitalism,
i.e. compatible with an economic system that actually works. IOW, a Baha'i
liberation theology would repeat the split between revolutionaries and
reformers.   

Best wishes,

Ian Kluge 




-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Rich Ater
Sent: October 2, 2005 9:24 PM
To: Baha'i Studies
Subject: Re: Baha'i Liberation "Theology" ((long quote))

>
>I certainly don't think we must eschew all activism. For instance, if
>Baha'is think it appropriate to boycott certain multi-nationals that
>routinely contract work out to those who utilize child labor, that's fine,
>IMO. 
>
Granted.

>We shouldn't oppose governments but there is no reason we can't oppose
>corporations.I'm personally not opposed to child labor for sentimental
>reasons, however. Children have always worked throughout most of history.
>  
>
This is different than the child labor I'm referring to. Kids working 
along side there parents is one thing. Kids sold to rug makers and dyers 
and chained to looms in pakistan are another. The sentimental reasons 
you may harbor are not reflected in the reality I'm discussing here.

> The problem with
>child labor in an industrial society is that it drags down the wages for
>adults below subsistence.
>  
>
The problem with child labor in an industrial society is that it usually 
coupled with brutality and coersion, such as the 14 year old girls used 
in Nike factories.

>Rich
>
>
> 
> 
>
>  
>



 
 
The information contained in this e-mail and any attachments thereto
("e-mail") is sent by the Johnson County Community College ("JCCC") and is
intended to be confidential and for the use of only the individual or entity
named above. The information may be protected by federal and state privacy
and disclosures acts or other legal rules. If the reader of this message is
not the intended recipient, you are notified that retention, dissemination,
distribution or copying of this e-mail is strictly prohibited. If you have
received this e-mail in error please immediately notify JCCC by email reply
and immediately and permanently delete this e-mail message and any
attachments thereto. Thank you.
 
 
__
 

You are subscribed to Baha'i Studies as: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe: send a blank email to
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subscribe: send subscribe bahai-st in the message body to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subscribe: http://list.jccc.edu:8080/read/all_forums/subscribe?name=bahai-st
Baha'i Studies is available through the following:
Mail - mailto:bahai-st@list.jccc.edu
Web - http://list.jccc.edu:8080/read/?forum=bahai-st
News - news://list.jccc.edu/bahai-st
Public - http://www.escribe.com/religion/bahaist
Old Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.net
New Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.edu




__
You are subscribed to Baha'i Studies as: mailto:archive@mail-archive.com
Unsubscribe: send a blank email to mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subscribe: send subscribe bahai-st in the message body to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subscribe: http://list.jccc.edu:8080/read/all_forums/subscribe?name=bahai-st
Baha'i Studies is available through the following:
Mail - mailto:bahai-st@list.jccc.edu
Web - http://list.jccc.edu:8080/read/?forum=bahai-st
News - news://list.jccc.edu/bahai-st
Public - http://www.escribe.com/religion/bahaist
Old Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.net
New Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.edu


RE: Baha'i Liberation "Theology" ((long quote))

2005-10-03 Thread Susan Maneck
"I think that there are other problems associated with child labor. For
instance, postindustrial societies, including those in the West, now require
that individuals receive at least a baccalaureate to be competitive in the
global economy. Child labor frequently makes it difficult, if not
impossible, for them to obtain the preparations necessary to be accepted
into a college or university or to have a successful academic experience."

True. However, child labor is rarely even an issue in post-industrial
societies. It is in those countries still in the process of
industrialization where it has become a problem.

warmest, Susan



 
 
The information contained in this e-mail and any attachments thereto ("e-mail") 
is sent by the Johnson County Community College ("JCCC") and is intended to be 
confidential and for the use of only the individual or entity named above. The 
information may be protected by federal and state privacy and disclosures acts 
or other legal rules. If the reader of this message is not the intended 
recipient, you are notified that retention, dissemination, distribution or 
copying of this e-mail is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail 
in error please immediately notify JCCC by email reply and immediately and 
permanently delete this e-mail message and any attachments thereto. Thank you.
 
 
__
 

You are subscribed to Baha'i Studies as: mailto:archive@mail-archive.com
Unsubscribe: send a blank email to mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subscribe: send subscribe bahai-st in the message body to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subscribe: http://list.jccc.edu:8080/read/all_forums/subscribe?name=bahai-st
Baha'i Studies is available through the following:
Mail - mailto:bahai-st@list.jccc.edu
Web - http://list.jccc.edu:8080/read/?forum=bahai-st
News - news://list.jccc.edu/bahai-st
Public - http://www.escribe.com/religion/bahaist
Old Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.net
New Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.edu


RE: Baha'i Liberation "Theology" ((long quote))

2005-10-02 Thread Mark A. Foster
Susan,

At 10:02 PM 10/2/2005, you wrote:
>>I'm personally not opposed to child labor for sentimental reasons, however. 
>>Children have always worked throughout most of history. But formally they 
>>worked under the supervision of their parents or other family members instead 
>>of being sent out to sweat shop. The problem with child labor in an 
>>industrial society is that it drags down the wages for adults below 
>>subsistence.<< 

I think that there are other problems associated with child labor. For 
instance, postindustrial societies, including those in the West, now require 
that individuals receive at least a baccalaureate to be competitive in the 
global economy. Child labor frequently makes it difficult, if not impossible, 
for them to obtain the preparations necessary to be accepted into a college or 
university or to have a successful academic experience.

Via moderna, Mark A. Foster . http://markfoster.net
... [a] word is ... a universal. - William of Ockham
Structurization Tech: http://tech.structurization.com 



 
 
The information contained in this e-mail and any attachments thereto ("e-mail") 
is sent by the Johnson County Community College ("JCCC") and is intended to be 
confidential and for the use of only the individual or entity named above. The 
information may be protected by federal and state privacy and disclosures acts 
or other legal rules. If the reader of this message is not the intended 
recipient, you are notified that retention, dissemination, distribution or 
copying of this e-mail is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail 
in error please immediately notify JCCC by email reply and immediately and 
permanently delete this e-mail message and any attachments thereto. Thank you.
 
 
__
 

You are subscribed to Baha'i Studies as: mailto:archive@mail-archive.com
Unsubscribe: send a blank email to mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subscribe: send subscribe bahai-st in the message body to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subscribe: http://list.jccc.edu:8080/read/all_forums/subscribe?name=bahai-st
Baha'i Studies is available through the following:
Mail - mailto:bahai-st@list.jccc.edu
Web - http://list.jccc.edu:8080/read/?forum=bahai-st
News - news://list.jccc.edu/bahai-st
Public - http://www.escribe.com/religion/bahaist
Old Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.net
New Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.edu


Re: Baha'i Liberation "Theology" ((long quote))

2005-10-02 Thread Mark A. Foster
Rich,

At 09:13 PM 10/2/2005, you wrote:
>>Baha'u'llah says we should admonish the rich. How do we do that if we eschew 
>>all activism?<<

I agree. It is certainly true that Baha'is, irrespective of their economic 
status, are encouraged to exhibit radiant acquiescence in the face of suffering 
and distress. However, I see that as a totally separate issue from the actions 
that Baha'is take for others - or that a poor person would take on behalf of 
members of her family, community, or society.

In a few of the pilgrims' notes about `Abdu'l-Baha, it appears fairly clear 
that, while He was willing to suffer, He did not tolerate injustice - even when 
He Himself was the victim. In particular, I have in mind one of several 
versions of the story in which He was overcharged for a taxicab ride. In at 
least one of them, He paid the correct (not the inflated) fair and refused to 
tip the driver.

Via moderna, Mark A. Foster . http://markfoster.net
... [a] word is ... a universal. - William of Ockham
Structurization Tech: http://tech.structurization.com 



 
 
The information contained in this e-mail and any attachments thereto ("e-mail") 
is sent by the Johnson County Community College ("JCCC") and is intended to be 
confidential and for the use of only the individual or entity named above. The 
information may be protected by federal and state privacy and disclosures acts 
or other legal rules. If the reader of this message is not the intended 
recipient, you are notified that retention, dissemination, distribution or 
copying of this e-mail is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail 
in error please immediately notify JCCC by email reply and immediately and 
permanently delete this e-mail message and any attachments thereto. Thank you.
 
 
__
 

You are subscribed to Baha'i Studies as: mailto:archive@mail-archive.com
Unsubscribe: send a blank email to mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subscribe: send subscribe bahai-st in the message body to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subscribe: http://list.jccc.edu:8080/read/all_forums/subscribe?name=bahai-st
Baha'i Studies is available through the following:
Mail - mailto:bahai-st@list.jccc.edu
Web - http://list.jccc.edu:8080/read/?forum=bahai-st
News - news://list.jccc.edu/bahai-st
Public - http://www.escribe.com/religion/bahaist
Old Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.net
New Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.edu


Re: Baha'i Liberation "Theology" ((long quote))

2005-10-02 Thread Rich Ater


I certainly don't think we must eschew all activism. For instance, if
Baha'is think it appropriate to boycott certain multi-nationals that
routinely contract work out to those who utilize child labor, that's fine,
IMO. 


Granted.


We shouldn't oppose governments but there is no reason we can't oppose
corporations.I'm personally not opposed to child labor for sentimental
reasons, however. Children have always worked throughout most of history.
 

This is different than the child labor I'm referring to. Kids working 
along side there parents is one thing. Kids sold to rug makers and dyers 
and chained to looms in pakistan are another. The sentimental reasons 
you may harbor are not reflected in the reality I'm discussing here.



The problem with
child labor in an industrial society is that it drags down the wages for
adults below subsistence.
 

The problem with child labor in an industrial society is that it usually 
coupled with brutality and coersion, such as the 14 year old girls used 
in Nike factories.



Rich





 







The information contained in this e-mail and any attachments thereto ("e-mail") is sent 
by the Johnson County Community College ("JCCC") and is intended to be confidential and 
for the use of only the individual or entity named above. The information may be protected by 
federal and state privacy and disclosures acts or other legal rules. If the reader of this message 
is not the intended recipient, you are notified that retention, dissemination, distribution or 
copying of this e-mail is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error please 
immediately notify JCCC by email reply and immediately and permanently delete this e-mail message 
and any attachments thereto. Thank you.


__


You are subscribed to Baha'i Studies as: mailto:archive@mail-archive.com
Unsubscribe: send a blank email to mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subscribe: send subscribe bahai-st in the message body to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subscribe: http://list.jccc.edu:8080/read/all_forums/subscribe?name=bahai-st
Baha'i Studies is available through the following:
Mail - mailto:bahai-st@list.jccc.edu
Web - http://list.jccc.edu:8080/read/?forum=bahai-st
News - news://list.jccc.edu/bahai-st
Public - http://www.escribe.com/religion/bahaist
Old Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.net
New Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.edu


RE: Baha'i Liberation "Theology" ((long quote))

2005-10-02 Thread Susan Maneck
"So, as a
Baha'i should I not be active in issues such as forced child labor,
first world incursions into the third world, or a variety of other
issues that the Faith speaks out about. Baha'u'llah says we should
admonish the rich. How do we do that if we eschew all activism?"

Dear Rich,

I certainly don't think we must eschew all activism. For instance, if
Baha'is think it appropriate to boycott certain multi-nationals that
routinely contract work out to those who utilize child labor, that's fine,
IMO. We shouldn't oppose governments but there is no reason we can't oppose
corporations.I'm personally not opposed to child labor for sentimental
reasons, however. Children have always worked throughout most of history.
But formally they worked under the supervision of their parents or other
family members instead of being sent out to sweat shop. The problem with
child labor in an industrial society is that it drags down the wages for
adults below subsistence.

warmest, Susan



 
 
The information contained in this e-mail and any attachments thereto ("e-mail") 
is sent by the Johnson County Community College ("JCCC") and is intended to be 
confidential and for the use of only the individual or entity named above. The 
information may be protected by federal and state privacy and disclosures acts 
or other legal rules. If the reader of this message is not the intended 
recipient, you are notified that retention, dissemination, distribution or 
copying of this e-mail is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail 
in error please immediately notify JCCC by email reply and immediately and 
permanently delete this e-mail message and any attachments thereto. Thank you.
 
 
__
 

You are subscribed to Baha'i Studies as: mailto:archive@mail-archive.com
Unsubscribe: send a blank email to mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subscribe: send subscribe bahai-st in the message body to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subscribe: http://list.jccc.edu:8080/read/all_forums/subscribe?name=bahai-st
Baha'i Studies is available through the following:
Mail - mailto:bahai-st@list.jccc.edu
Web - http://list.jccc.edu:8080/read/?forum=bahai-st
News - news://list.jccc.edu/bahai-st
Public - http://www.escribe.com/religion/bahaist
Old Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.net
New Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.edu


Re: Baha'i Liberation "Theology" ((long quote))

2005-10-02 Thread Rich Ater

Susan Maneck wrote:


One problem in interpreting Baha'i doctrine as "Liberation Theology" lies in
the fact that Baha'is are usually discouraged from involving themselves in
political affairs. Cole regards this a temporary measure adopted by
`Abdu'l-Baha, made in response to the turmoil of the Iranian Constitutional
Revolution which has been maintained by the Baha'i community in its early
stage of development to avoid internal divisions. Cole argues that avoidance
of party politics should not exclude social activism among Baha'is. "The
poor, like other Baha'is," according to Cole, "are called upon to denounce
tyranny and infractions against basic human rights, to work for
parliamentary democracy, to allow for the expression of the views of the
humblest Baha'i within the community, and to reform the world's economy so
as to reflect the divine attribute of justice" (93).
 


Susan,
   I followed what you were saying, and I agree that we should eschew 
partisan politics. The problem is that I think we take that too far and 
eschew all political stances. I agree with Mark's statement as someone 
with a Marxist bent that theory must be followed with praxis. So, as a 
Baha'i should I not be active in issues such as forced child labor, 
first world incursions into the third world, or a variety of other 
issues that the Faith speaks out about. Baha'u'llah says we should 
admonish the rich. How do we do that if we eschew all activism? The 
House condemned free market capitalism in the Century of Light, should I 
remain silent about it's practices? I bring this up for discussion 
because they're important issues.

Rich






 







The information contained in this e-mail and any attachments thereto ("e-mail") is sent 
by the Johnson County Community College ("JCCC") and is intended to be confidential and 
for the use of only the individual or entity named above. The information may be protected by 
federal and state privacy and disclosures acts or other legal rules. If the reader of this message 
is not the intended recipient, you are notified that retention, dissemination, distribution or 
copying of this e-mail is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error please 
immediately notify JCCC by email reply and immediately and permanently delete this e-mail message 
and any attachments thereto. Thank you.


__


You are subscribed to Baha'i Studies as: mailto:archive@mail-archive.com
Unsubscribe: send a blank email to mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subscribe: send subscribe bahai-st in the message body to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subscribe: http://list.jccc.edu:8080/read/all_forums/subscribe?name=bahai-st
Baha'i Studies is available through the following:
Mail - mailto:bahai-st@list.jccc.edu
Web - http://list.jccc.edu:8080/read/?forum=bahai-st
News - news://list.jccc.edu/bahai-st
Public - http://www.escribe.com/religion/bahaist
Old Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.net
New Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.edu


RE: Baha'i Liberation "Theology" ((long quote))

2005-10-02 Thread Susan Maneck
"A Baha'i liberation theology might use the language of other liberation
theologies, but it would, IMO, need to be grounded in the Baha'i primary
sources."

Yes, the problem with Juan's work is it was too selective in its use of
sources. Sound theology needs to consider and take into account all of the
relevant material.

warmest, Susan



 
 
The information contained in this e-mail and any attachments thereto ("e-mail") 
is sent by the Johnson County Community College ("JCCC") and is intended to be 
confidential and for the use of only the individual or entity named above. The 
information may be protected by federal and state privacy and disclosures acts 
or other legal rules. If the reader of this message is not the intended 
recipient, you are notified that retention, dissemination, distribution or 
copying of this e-mail is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail 
in error please immediately notify JCCC by email reply and immediately and 
permanently delete this e-mail message and any attachments thereto. Thank you.
 
 
__
 

You are subscribed to Baha'i Studies as: mailto:archive@mail-archive.com
Unsubscribe: send a blank email to mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subscribe: send subscribe bahai-st in the message body to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subscribe: http://list.jccc.edu:8080/read/all_forums/subscribe?name=bahai-st
Baha'i Studies is available through the following:
Mail - mailto:bahai-st@list.jccc.edu
Web - http://list.jccc.edu:8080/read/?forum=bahai-st
News - news://list.jccc.edu/bahai-st
Public - http://www.escribe.com/religion/bahaist
Old Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.net
New Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.edu


RE: Baha'i Liberation "Theology" ((long quote))

2005-10-02 Thread Mark A. Foster
Susan,

At 05:21 PM 10/2/2005, you wrote:
>>Several years ago Juan Cole wrote an article on the Baha'i Faith and 
>>liberation theology. Here is the review I wrote to that artice:<<

There are, of course, many liberation "theologies." Although liberation 
theology began among Latin American Jesuits, I also have books on Protestant 
liberation theologies, Muslim liberation theologies, Jewish liberation 
theologies, African American liberation theologies, and feminist liberation 
thealogies (with an "a").

A Baha'i liberation theology might use the language of other liberation 
theologies, but it would, IMO, need to be grounded in the Baha'i primary 
sources.

Via moderna, Mark A. Foster . http://markfoster.net
... [a] word is ... a universal. - William of Ockham
Structurization Tech: http://tech.structurization.com 



 
 
The information contained in this e-mail and any attachments thereto ("e-mail") 
is sent by the Johnson County Community College ("JCCC") and is intended to be 
confidential and for the use of only the individual or entity named above. The 
information may be protected by federal and state privacy and disclosures acts 
or other legal rules. If the reader of this message is not the intended 
recipient, you are notified that retention, dissemination, distribution or 
copying of this e-mail is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail 
in error please immediately notify JCCC by email reply and immediately and 
permanently delete this e-mail message and any attachments thereto. Thank you.
 
 
__
 

You are subscribed to Baha'i Studies as: mailto:archive@mail-archive.com
Unsubscribe: send a blank email to mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subscribe: send subscribe bahai-st in the message body to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subscribe: http://list.jccc.edu:8080/read/all_forums/subscribe?name=bahai-st
Baha'i Studies is available through the following:
Mail - mailto:bahai-st@list.jccc.edu
Web - http://list.jccc.edu:8080/read/?forum=bahai-st
News - news://list.jccc.edu/bahai-st
Public - http://www.escribe.com/religion/bahaist
Old Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.net
New Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.edu


RE: Baha'i Liberation "Theology" ((long quote))

2005-10-02 Thread Susan Maneck
Several years ago Juan Cole wrote an article on the Baha'i Faith and
liberation theology. Here is the review I wrote to that artice:

In "Baha'u'llah and Liberation Theology" Professor Juan Cole discusses the
implications of Baha'u'llah's revelation in terms of the Liberation Theology
developed within Latin American. Liberation Theology draws upon the Exodus
story and the prophetic tradition as a whole to express God's special
commitment to and identification with the plight of the the poor as a means
for legitimizing their struggle for justice involving, in most cases, some
form of political agitation, whether violent or non-violent. It is therefore
a theology of revolution. He argues that while the Baha'i Faith eschews both
violence and party politics as a means to obtain its goals of social
transformation, a theology of liberation, is integral to Baha'u'llah's
revelation. Cole seeks to establish this by drawing upon such statements
from the Writings such as "the Ancient Beauty hath consented to be bound
with chains that mankind may be released from its bondage" (80). Cole points
to the contrasts Baha'u'llah makes between the spiritual dangers and
temptations associated with wealth versus the virtues of poverty. From this
the conclusion is drawn that the poor are spiritually superior to the rich
and are their equals in civil society, for Baha'u'llah urges all to "eat
with the same mouth and dwell in the same land" (84).

Besides criticizing excessive attachment to worldly riches, Baha'u'llah
condemns political tyranny as well. While Baha'u'llah urges the poor to
endure their sufferings patiently, He stresses their dignity and independent
agency by encouraging them to strive to obtain an adequate means of
livelihood. According to Cole, Baha'u'llah also calls upon them to work
"ceaselessly toward the creation of a new civilization wherein the extreme
of wealth and poverty would be eliminated at last" (92).

One problem in interpreting Baha'i doctrine as "Liberation Theology" lies in
the fact that Baha'is are usually discouraged from involving themselves in
political affairs. Cole regards this a temporary measure adopted by
`Abdu'l-Baha, made in response to the turmoil of the Iranian Constitutional
Revolution which has been maintained by the Baha'i community in its early
stage of development to avoid internal divisions. Cole argues that avoidance
of party politics should not exclude social activism among Baha'is. "The
poor, like other Baha'is," according to Cole, "are called upon to denounce
tyranny and infractions against basic human rights, to work for
parliamentary democracy, to allow for the expression of the views of the
humblest Baha'i within the community, and to reform the world's economy so
as to reflect the divine attribute of justice" (93).

In connection with this Cole points out that Baha'u'llah calls for state
intervention the poor by implementing a graduated income tax, prohibiting
slavery, and cutting back on military budgets. Indeed, what Baha'u'llah
expects is basic structural changes grounded in faith and universal love
which will bring about the total transformation of society, enriching and
empowering the poor.

Dr. Cole's essay provides a very provocative look at the implications of
Baha'i theology in terms of current political trends. There were several
instances, however, where his logic seemed flawed, where historical evidence
does not support his basic thesis, and where his selection of scripture was
misleadingly unbalanced. He notes, for instance, that the Baha'i Faith
membership has largely been drawn from the poor and dispossessed in Third
World countries, attracted by the Baha'i system of governance with its
emphasis on elected bodies (rather than a professional clergy) which insures
that the poor have a real and effective voice within Baha'i communities.
This ignores the reluctance on the part of most of impoverished people who
have embraced the Baha'i Faith to participate fully in such administrative
institutions. It appears highly unlikely that the existence of such bodies
were the means of attracting the poor and dispossessed.

Equally confusing is Cole's suggestion that a "truly Baha'i society" "would
guarantee basic human rights as outlined in United Nations declarations and
covenants." It is difficult to reconcile this statement with Dr. Cole's
earlier insistence that any Baha'i theology must be grounded in "scripture
and theophanology" (81). As laudatory as such United Nations documents might
be, they hardly constitute Divine Revelation!

Dr. Cole insists that Baha'u'llah's praise for the British style of
"parliamentary democracy" [sic] after 1868 indicated His belief that the
poor should have a voice in their own governance. While Baha'u'llah would
not likely have objected to such sentiments, this can hardly be concluded
from His praise of the constitutional monarchy in England, which by 1868 had
only enfranchised the moneyed classes. The British Parliament, far which

RE: Baha'i Liberation "Theology"

2005-10-02 Thread Khazeh Fananapazir
Thank you thank you dearest Mark for your thread

Your poor lowly brother khazeh


 Although Baha'u'llah was solitary, secluded and unknown in His retirement,
the report spread throughout Kurdistan that this was a most remarkable and
learned Personage, gifted with a wonderful power of attraction.  In a short
time Kurdistan was magnetized with His love.  During this period Baha'u'llah
lived in poverty. His garments were those of the poor and needy.  His food
was that of the indigent and lowly.  An atmosphere of majesty haloed Him as
the sun at midday.
(`Abdu'l-Baha:  Promulgation of Universal Peace*, Page: 26)


 Tonight I am very happy, for I have come here to meet my friends.  I
consider you my relatives, my companions; and I am your comrade. 
 You must be thankful to God that you are poor, for Jesus Christ has
said, "Blessed are the poor."  He never said, "Blessed are the rich."  He
said, too, that the Kingdom is for the poor and that it is easier for a
camel to enter a needle's eye than for a rich man to enter God's Kingdom.
Therefore, you must be thankful to God that although in this world you are
indigent, yet the treasures of God are within your reach; and although in
the material realm you are poor, yet in the Kingdom of God you are precious.
Jesus Himself was poor.  He did not belong to the rich.  He passed His time
in the desert, travelling among the poor, and lived upon the herbs of the
field.  He had no place to lay His head, no home.  He was exposed in the
open to heat, cold and frost - to inclement weather of all kinds - yet He
chose this rather than riches.  If riches were considered a glory, the
Prophet Moses would have chosen them; Jesus would have been a rich man.
When Jesus Christ appeared, it was the poor who first accepted Him, not the
rich.  Therefore, you are the disciples of Jesus Christ; you are His
comrades, for He outwardly was poor, not rich.  Even this earth's happiness
does not depend upon wealth.  You will find many of the wealthy exposed to
dangers and troubled by difficulties, and in their last moments upon the bed
of death there remains the regret that they must be separated from that to
which their hearts are so attached.  They come into this world naked, and
they must go from it naked.  All they possess they must leave behind and
pass away solitary, alone. Often at the time of death their souls are filled
with remorse; and worst of all, their hope in the mercy of God is less than
ours.  Praise be to God!  Our hope is in the mercy of God, and there is no
doubt that the divine compassion is bestowed upon the poor.  Jesus Christ
said so; Baha'u'llah said so.  While Baha'u'llah was in Baghdad, still in
possession of great wealth, He left all He had and went alone from the city,
living two years among the poor.  They were His comrades.  He ate with them,
slept with them and gloried in being one of them.  He chose for one of His
names the title of The Poor One and often in His Writings refers to Himself
as Darvish, which in Persian means poor; and of this title He was very
proud.  He admonished all that we must be the servants of the poor, helpers
of the poor, remember the sorrows of the poor, associate with them; for
thereby we may inherit the Kingdom of heaven.  God has not said that there
are mansions prepared for us if we pass our time associating with the rich,
but He has said there are many mansions prepared for the servants of the
poor, for the poor are very dear to God.  The mercies and bounties of God
are with them.  The rich are mostly negligent, inattentive, steeped in
worldliness, depending upon their means, whereas the poor are dependent upon
God, and their reliance is upon Him, not upon themselves.  Therefore, the
poor are nearer the threshold of God and His throne. 
 Jesus was a poor man.  One night when He was out in the fields, the
rain began to fall.  He had no place to go for shelter so He lifted His eyes
toward heaven, saying, "O Father!  For the birds of the air Thou hast
created nests, for the sheep a fold, for the animals dens, for the fish
places of refuge, but for Me Thou hast provided no shelter.  There is no
place where I may lay My head.  My bed consists of the cold ground; My lamps
at night are the stars, and My food is the grass of the field.  Yet who upon
earth is richer than I? For the greatest blessing Thou hast not given to the
rich and mighty but unto Me, for Thou hast given Me the poor.  To me Thou
hast granted this blessing.  They are Mine.  Therefore am I the richest man
on earth." 
 So, my comrades, you are following in the footsteps of Jesus Christ.
Your lives are similar to His life; your attitude is like unto His; you
resemble Him more than the rich do.  Therefore, we will thank God that we
have been so blessed with real riches.  And in conclusion, I ask you to
accept Abdu'l-Baha as your servant. 
(`Abdu'l-Baha:  Promulgation of Universal Peace*, Pages: 32-34)




 
 
The information contained in this e-m

Re: Baha'i Liberation "Theology" ((long quote))

2005-10-02 Thread Mark A. Foster
Don,

At 09:38 AM 10/2/2005, you wrote:
>>Before people jump in with all six feet, I strongly urge them to read and 
>>consider two msgs from the House of Justice.  One is found as msg 151 in 
>>"Messages from the Universal House of Justice, 1963-1986"  I don't believe 
>>the other has been published, so I have included it below.<<

I am not suggesting that Baha'is become involved in partisan politics. As I 
have said here before, even were I not a Baha'i, I would have long ago lost my 
faith in many of moral, economic, and political problems being resolved in the 
context of the American framework of partisan politics. (As a non-Baha'i, I 
would likely have become a Marxist-Trotskyite revolutionary or, perhaps, a 
social insurrectionary anarchist.)

I am referring to reformulating Baha'i-inspired social and economic development 
projects in light of the statements I quoted on poverty and corporate 
capitalism. To a Marxist, theory and praxis are inseparable. Therefore, I find 
it inconceivable that I should be opposed to corporate capitalism and not do 
something about it.

Via moderna, Mark A. Foster . http://markfoster.net
... [a] word is ... a universal. - William of Ockham
Structurization Tech: http://tech.structurization.com 



 
 
The information contained in this e-mail and any attachments thereto ("e-mail") 
is sent by the Johnson County Community College ("JCCC") and is intended to be 
confidential and for the use of only the individual or entity named above. The 
information may be protected by federal and state privacy and disclosures acts 
or other legal rules. If the reader of this message is not the intended 
recipient, you are notified that retention, dissemination, distribution or 
copying of this e-mail is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail 
in error please immediately notify JCCC by email reply and immediately and 
permanently delete this e-mail message and any attachments thereto. Thank you.
 
 
__
 

You are subscribed to Baha'i Studies as: mailto:archive@mail-archive.com
Unsubscribe: send a blank email to mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subscribe: send subscribe bahai-st in the message body to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subscribe: http://list.jccc.edu:8080/read/all_forums/subscribe?name=bahai-st
Baha'i Studies is available through the following:
Mail - mailto:bahai-st@list.jccc.edu
Web - http://list.jccc.edu:8080/read/?forum=bahai-st
News - news://list.jccc.edu/bahai-st
Public - http://www.escribe.com/religion/bahaist
Old Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.net
New Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.edu


Re: Baha'i Liberation "Theology" ((long quote))

2005-10-02 Thread Don Calkins
Title: Re: Baha'i Liberation "Theology" ((long
quote))







At 8:29 AM -0500 10/2/05, Mark A. Foster wrote:


In a Baha'i liberation "theology,"
what role, if any, should Baha'is play in freeing the poor from
oppressive capitalism? Will we be judged if we do not? How might our
social and economic development programs be reconceived in this
light?


Before people jump in with all six feet, I strongly urge them to
read and consider two msgs from the House of Justice.  One is
found as msg 151 in "Messages from the Universal House of
Justice, 1963-1986"  I don't believe the other has been
published, so I have included it below.

Don C

=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
The following letter dated October 24,
1990, was written on behalf of the Universal House of Justice to a
National Spiritual Assembly that was seeking guidance about the
advisability of local Spiritual Assemblies or individual Baha'is
associating with activist groups such as the Greenpeace organization.
.


Dear Baha'i Friends,
The Universal House of Justice has received
your letter of November 27, 1989. It regrets that the pressure of work
has prevented it from responding earlier. We have been directed to
convey the following on its behalf.

The several issues raised in your letter are best considered in light
of the insights conveyed in the Baha'i teachings about the manner in
which the innumerable problems of an ailing society can best be
resolved and its distressing condition ameliorated. Baha'u'llah has
stated in His Tablet to Queen Victoria: "That which the Lord hath
ordained as the sovereign remedy and mightiest instrument for the
healing of all the world is the union of all its peoples in one
universal Cause, one common Faith. This can in no wise be achieved
except through the power of a skilled, an all-powerful and inspired
Physician. This, verily, is the truth, and all else naught but
error."

The well-being of humanity is a reflection of its spiritual state, and
any enduring change for the better in its material affairs requires a
change in its spiritual condition. For this reason the principal
concern and contribution of the followers of Baha'u'llah is the
spiritual transformation of human society, with full confidence that
by this means they are making a most valuable and most fundamental
contribution to the betterment of the world and the rectification of
its many problems. It is the responsibility of the institutions of the
Faith to assist the believers in their endeavors to acquire an
accurate and profound understanding of the indissoluble connection
between their efforts to propagate the Faith and consolidate its
institutions and their commendable desire to contribute to improvement
in the quality of human life. They should realize also that their
approach to the solution of the world's problems will not be
understood, and may even be disparaged by the idealistic materialists
whose labors are directed so assiduously to improvement in the
material welfare of humanity, and to whom material good is the only
standard by which the condition of society is assessed. The Universal
House of Justice has stated on an earlier occasion that
"most people have no clear concept of the sort of world they wish
to build, nor how to go about building it. Even those who are
concerned to improve conditions are therefore reduced to combating
every apparent evil that takes their attention. Willingness to fight
against evils, whether in the form of conditions or embodied in evil
men, has thus become for most people the touchstone by which they
judge a person's moral worth. Baha'is, on the other hand, know the
goal they are working toward and know what they must do, step by step,
to attain it. Their whole energy is directed toward the building of
the good, a good which has such a positive strength that in the face
of it the multitude of evils-which are in essence negative-will fade
away and be no more. To enter into the quixotic tournament of
demolishing one by one the evils in the world is, to a Baha'i, a vain
waste of time and effort. His whole life is directed toward
proclaiming the Message of Baha'u'llah, reviving the spiritual life of
his fellow-men, uniting them in a divinely created World Order, and
then, as that Order grows in strength and influence, he will see the
power of that Message transforming the whole of human society and
progressively solving the problems and removing the injustices which
have so long bedeviled the world."

Such a perspective does not mean that Baha'is should avoid doing
whatever they can to help others and alleviate human distress, or that
they should not associate with and support suitable like-minded
organizations. On the contrary, the believers should, at all times, be
alert to opportunities to do whatever is within their power to make
the conditions of human life better;