[BAROQUE-LUTE] Yet more Re: [VIHUELAR) Re: Moravsky Manuscript AND five course guitar stringing

2018-01-07 Thread Martyn Hodgson
   Dear Monica.
   My responses are interposed below in bold, new roman and italic for
   clear differentiation (sadly, though, not in my preferred typeface for
   the others on the list version which only goes to them in standard
   typeface and no spacing but, from what Wayne tells me, it'll reach you
   with correct typeface etc)
   I think we must still agree to disagree about much of
   this!..
   Best wishes,
   Martyn
 __

   From: "mjlh...@tiscali.co.uk" 
   To: hodgsonmar...@yahoo.co.uk; Daniel Shoskes ;
   VihuelaList 
   Sent: Saturday, 6 January 2018, 16:41
   Subject: Re: [VIHUELA] Further to Re: Moravsky Manuscript AND five
   course guitar stringing
   Unfortunately the folio numbers are not very clear in the pdf. Some of
   the pages seem to have been cropped on the right- hand side when the
   film was made and the recto and verso of each folio is on a single page
   of the pdf.
   -
   [MH: Yes - it's a shame about this]
   -
I will try to refer to the correct ones.
   To recap
   Folio 48r is headed "Fundamenta Gytarra".
   -
   [MH: Indeed, and not as just 'Cytarra' (or Chytarra) as correctly
   pointed
out in my last]
   -
The tablature checks indicate that this instrument has five stopped
   courses and one
   additional unstopped bass course. Folio 48v is headed "Accordo Gytarra
   et Mandora".
   -
   [MH: This is an incorrect assumption. The overwhelming bulk of pieces
   of
pieces in this MS are clearly written for just a five course
   instrument  (see
   my telling note earlier about the transcription for a five course
   instrument
- I naturally suggest for gytarra for this version of the same (Losy?)
   piece presented earlier for a six course instrument, the mandora).
   -
   You are right â I agree that these are two different instruments. The
   Gytarra has five
   stopped courses and one unstopped bass as shown in the first section of
   the tablature.
   -
   {MH: No, you've got this mixed up, as explained earlier and again in
   this
mail. The gytarra has five courses, the madora six. The theorboed
   instrument is probably a theorboed guitar a la Strad or similar..
   -
   The Mandora has seven unstopped basses as shown in the
   second section of tablature. It is to be assumed that the stopped
   courses of both instruments are tuned in the same way. It is not for a
   five course gytarra or a six course mandora as you seem to suggest.
   -
   [MH:  This is a mistaken view of what the source tells us since, as
already pointed out, most of the pieces (some 85% of them) in the MS
   are for just a five course instrument. You have assumed that the part
   between the first set of double bar lines refers equally to the
   gytarra
   and to the mandora.
   As already explained, this is mistaken because the overwhelming bulk
of  pieces in the MS are, in fact,  for a five course instrument (the
   gytarra) rather than for the common mandora tuning with six courses.
   I examine this matter again below]
   -
   I don't think either of these two examples refer to an instrument with
   just five stopped courses.
   -
   [ MH: as said above, you appear to have overlooked contrary
   information
   about the tablature already brought to your attention earlier.]
   -
   On Folio 96r there is a table of alfabeto chords and a tablature tuning
   chart headed "Accordo aliud" (?). If that is right I assume it means
   "another tuning" but my Latin or Czech is pretty basic. In the table of
   chords, the open courses to be included are only shown for Chord E;
   Chord is very odd â Indeed, as pointed out, they are wrong -  a B flat
   minor chord with G on the first course. There are stroke marks on the
   lowest line.
   -
   [MH: No - this is a simple bowlderisation and inaccurate
   representation
   of nominal five course guitar tuning (as employed in the following aria
set in tablature AND with Alafbeto - see my earlier note about this
   feature in this particular piece which has been overlooked). Clearly
   the tuning diagram showing an octave between the open first and fifth
fret on the third course makes no sense - neither does that between
   the
   third fret of the second course and the open third course! The scribe
   has simply got the courses wrong..
   It is the following aria (on f. 96v not on 96),  identified in my last,
   this
piece clearly confirms this piece as being in the ordinary nominal
   guitar
   tuning intervals - and not any known lute (or mandora!) tuning. The
   mandora never employed Alfabeto as appears in this work
   -
   As far as the pieces are concerned, whether or not the unstopped sixth
   course is used seems to  depend on the key of the piece. Those on f.
   48v- f.59v which use the sixth course are mostly in C major or keys
   without sharps, whilst those from f. 60r âf.76v are in A major or D
   ma

[BAROQUE-LUTE] Re: Yet more Re: [VIHUELAR) Re: Moravsky Manuscript AND five course guitar stringing

2018-01-07 Thread mjlh...@tiscali.co.uk
I can't possibly respond to all of this.  You seem to be so muddled 
that it is difficult to grasp what you actually mean..
I think your interpretation of the tablature tuning checks is simply 
wrong. The fact that much of the music does not use the sixth unstopped 
course,(or for that matter the seven unstopped courses of the mandora) 
is irrelevant.  The tablature tuning check for the gytara indicates 
that it has 5 stopped courses and one unstopped bass. You are muddling 
up two different facets of the manuscript. None of this has any bearing 
on how the 5-course guitar was strung.

My analysis of the keys of the pieces is as accurate as I could make in 
the time available.The pieces which use the sixth course are in C major 
or flat keys and the ones which do not are almost all in A major, with 
a few in D major.   The manuscript was obviously copied over a period 
of time.  The pieces from f.76v form a new section with pieces numbered 
1-56, probably copied at a later date.  The manuscript is a very 
complex document.

You also seem to be confused about Stradivarius. It is not clear 
whether these instruments are lute shaped or figure of 8 shaped. The 
surviving patterns are of the neck and pegboxes only. The stringing 
instructions for the one of them indicate that the high octave strings 
are on the thumb side of the course.  

I will have to leave it there.

As ever
Monica

Original Message
From: hodgsonmar...@yahoo.co.uk
Date: 07/01/2018 14:48 
To: "Monica Hall", "Daniel Shoskes", "VihuelaList", "Baroque Lute List"

Subj: Yet more Re: [VIHUELAR) Re: Moravsky Manuscript AND five course 
guitar stringing

Dear Monica.
My responses are interposed below in bold, new roman and italic for 
clear differentiation (sadly, though, not in my preferred typeface for 
the others on the list version which only goes to them in standard 
typeface and no spacing but, from what Wayne tells me, it'll reach you 
with correct typeface etc)
I think we must still agree to disagree about much of 
this!..
Best wishes,
Martyn
  From: "mjlh...@tiscali.co.uk" 
 To: hodgsonmar...@yahoo.co.uk; Daniel Shoskes ; 
VihuelaList  
 Sent: Saturday, 6 January 2018, 16:41
 Subject: Re: [VIHUELA] Further to Re: Moravsky Manuscript AND five 
course guitar stringing
   
Unfortunately the folio numbers are not very clear in the pdf. Some of 
the pages seem to have been cropped on the right- hand side when the 
film was made and the recto and verso of each folio is on a single 
page 
of the pdf.-[MH: Yes - it's a shame about this]-   I will try to refer 
to the correct ones.
To recapFolio 48r is headed “Fundamenta Gytarra”. -[MH: Indeed, and not 
as just 'Cytarra' (or Chytarra) as correctly pointed out in my last]
- The tablature checks indicate that this instrument has five stopped 
courses and one additional unstopped bass course. Folio 48v is headed 
“Accordo Gytarra et Mandora”. -[MH: This is an incorrect assumption. 
The overwhelming bulk of pieces of pieces in this MS are clearly 
written for just a five course instrument  (see my telling note earlier 
about the transcription for a five course instrument  - I naturally 
suggest for gytarra for this version of the same (Losy?) 
piece presented earlier for a six course instrument, the mandora).-You 
are right – I agree that these are two different instruments. The 
Gytarra has five 
stopped courses and one unstopped bass as shown in the first section 
of 
the tablature.  -
{MH: No, you've got this mixed up, as explained earlier and again in 
this mail. The gytarra has five courses, the madora six. The theorboed 
instrument is probably a theorboed guitar a la Strad or similar..
- The Mandora has seven unstopped basses as shown in the 
second section of tablature. It is to be assumed that the stopped 
courses of both instruments are tuned in the same way. It is not for a 
five course gytarra or a six course mandora as you seem to suggest.
-[MH:  This is a mistaken view of what the source tells us since, 
as already pointed out, most of the pieces (some 85% of them) in the 
MS are for just a five course instrument. You have assumed that the 
part between the first set of double bar lines refers equally to the 
gytarra and to the mandora.  As already explained, this is mistaken 
because the overwhelming bulk of  pieces in the MS are, in fact,  for a 
five course instrument (thegytarra) rather than for the common mandora 
tuning with six courses.  I examine this matter again below]-I don’t 
think either of these two examples refer to an instrument with 
just five stopped courses.
-[ MH: as said above, you appear to have overlooked contrary 
information about the tablature already brought to your attention 
earlier.] -On Folio 96r there is a table of alfabeto chords and a 
tablature tuning 
chart headed “Accordo aliud” (?). If that is right I assume it means 
“another tuning” but my Latin or Czech is pretty basic. In the table 
of 
chords, the open cours