BBEdit package aimed at Zend Framework hacking
Hey everyone, I've found an excuse to exercise the new bbpackage functionality; I'm trying to extend a bunch of stuff I need in my day job, working with Zend Framework. So I put it up on Github, I hope someone finds it useful. Love to hear some feedback! https://github.com/neurobashing/BBEdit-Zend-Framework- -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the BBEdit Talk discussion group on Google Groups. To post to this group, send email to bbedit@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to bbedit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/bbedit?hl=en If you have a feature request or would like to report a problem, please email supp...@barebones.com rather than posting to the group. Follow @bbedit on Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/bbedit
Add support for custom Terminal
I want support for another Terminal than Apple Terminal supported. I specific want to use iTerm2 instead. You used to be able to do this: defaults write com.barebones.bbedit Misc:TerminalBundleIDOverride com.googlecode.iTerm2 But it doesn't work anymore :s -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the BBEdit Talk discussion group on Google Groups. To post to this group, send email to bbedit@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to bbedit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/bbedit?hl=en If you have a feature request or would like to report a problem, please email supp...@barebones.com rather than posting to the group. Follow @bbedit on Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/bbedit
changes to Find
I've been a user of BBEdit for over 10 years, and there's surely nothing better on the market; and usually, with every new version, I find nifty improvements. I'll also preface this by saying that, resistant as I can be to change, I've immediately adjusted, and happily too, to each new version. With version 10 though, it's not a matter of me adjusting or not, but what I feel to be the introduction of real flaws. The worst course reversal has been in the Find function, and I hope it'll be set right again in the next version. Specifically: One of the very nice arrangements in previous versions was the handling of the Live Find feature. I used to do a Live Find on a document, then go to another document and do the same Live Find on it with no further ado. Now, I have to reënter the same thing all over again for each document. The Live Find also worked so that when I found the instance I was looking for I could just type over it, or arrow my way to what I wanted from there. No more! Now, I have to press Tab; to continue with the Live Find, I then have to go back to the Live Find box etc. Very irritating. A corollary of this new handling of Live Find: It used to be that when you were thru with one live find, you could proceed with another, by rekeying the key equivalent. Now if you do that, you still have the previous one to get rid of. The two separate Find windows don't make much sense; all the more so that if you change one, the other is changed as well. (The two separate windows might make some sense if they allowed us to have one search in a document, the other over a set of document. Even then, not much.) In the Find window, I used to be able to specify Case Sensitive, Entire Word, and GREP, Wrap Around, Case Sensitive in the Find window — with command keys. That's gone (and the check boxes for them to boot have shrunk really small): very, very inconvenient. ▸Please restore the command-key equivalents! And, especially if you don't do that, at least make those checkboxes some normal size again so we don't have to have the fine fingers of brain surgeons to click on them! I used to be able to manage my Find Patterns, from a very handy window reached thru Preferences. In that window, my patterns appeared in the order I had them: I could add them, rename them, delete them, or move them higher or lower in my menu. Now — as far as I can tell — there's no way of doing some of that: Manage Patterns appears as a line in that menu, and opens a window in which I can only add, delete, or rename: I can't move them in the menu. (Over time, some patterns become more important, or less important, to me: why shouldn't I be able to move them up or down in the menu?) The patterns do not appear in the order in which I have them, but in alphabetical order. [I just tried, by the way, to circumvent not being able to move the patterns in the menu — a pattern I'd named variant. . ., I want it at the top these days — OK I'll rename it AAA variant: to my surprise, BBEdit crashed.] In the Find Patterns menu — mine has 133 patterns in it (just counted) — the Save line used to be at the top. Now, idiotically, it's at the bottom: forcing me to scroll all the way down the list just to save a pattern. ▸At least put it back at the top! In sum, a lot of good features have been thrown over; I can't see why, either. Please restore them! (Don't get me started on those horrible document drawers, which global searches sometimes wind up creating.) ★★★ Finally, not bugs or disimprovements, but friendly suggestions for continued improvements (after the vs. 10 stuff I mentioned has been undone): ▸It would be nice to add a Save Pattern button directly on the Find Window: why should I have to open the Find Pattern list and scroll to a menu line to do this? This is surely one of the commonest things people do? ▸It would be nice if Find Pattern submenus were available: so that those of us with long sets of find patterns could group them, and navigate to individual patterns faster and more logically. (Some of my patterns deal with stuff I do to document on one part of my site but not the others; some are manipulations of polytonic Greek — checks for example that there are no unaccented words other than enclitics, etc.) Thanks in advance for considering these improvements — BT -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the BBEdit Talk discussion group on Google Groups. To post to this group, send email to bbedit@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to bbedit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/bbedit?hl=en If you have a feature request or would like to report a problem, please email supp...@barebones.com rather than posting to the group. Follow @bbedit on Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/bbedit
Re: changes to Find
On 2011-08-06, Bill Thayer wrote: The two separate Find windows don't make much sense; all the more so that if you change one, the other is changed as well. (The two separate windows might make some sense if they allowed us to have one search in a document, the other over a set of document. Even then, not much.) I on the other hand like this a lot (and it's not changed from v. 9.x). Sometimes I search and replace in one doc, test, then decide I want to make the same change in several other docs, so it's convenient to have same pattern and replacement in the muti-doc dialog. In the Find window, I used to be able to specify Case Sensitive, Entire Word, and GREP, Wrap Around, Case Sensitive in the Find window — with command keys. That's gone No it's not - the key commands have changed - see the manual or a post from BB folk on this list about a week ago. I used to be able to manage my Find Patterns, from a very handy window reached thru Preferences. That's now handled under BBdit - Setup. I do agree that having Save Pattern at the bottom of the list is sub-optimal... Did you send you message to Support? HTH - Bruce _bruce__van_allen__santa_cruz_ca_ -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the BBEdit Talk discussion group on Google Groups. To post to this group, send email to bbedit@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to bbedit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/bbedit?hl=en If you have a feature request or would like to report a problem, please email supp...@barebones.com rather than posting to the group. Follow @bbedit on Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/bbedit
Re: changes to Find
▸I on the other hand like [the two separate Find windows] a lot (and it's not changed from v. 9.x). I'm getting used to it, and it's not critical (oh, and sharp eye! I jumped from 8.6). ▸▸In the Find window, I used to be able to specify Case Sensitive. . . ▸No it's not - the key commands have changed - see the manual or a post from BB folk on this list about a week ago. Hearty thanks! and very good to hear. Missed that somehow, tsk‑tsk. ▸▸I used to be able to manage my Find Patterns, from a very handy window reached thru Preferences. ▸That's now handled under BBdit - Setup. I didn’t know about that. On the other hand, it still displays them in alphabetical order and doesn't seem to let me move the Find Patterns and put them in the order I want, which was my big beef. In sum it's the same window I get from the Find window: and in fact if I open Set Up, then go to the Find window and open the other, I have one set-up window open, not two. ▸Did you send you message to Support? No, I didn’t. It seems more of a bug than anything I need support with. BT -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the BBEdit Talk discussion group on Google Groups. To post to this group, send email to bbedit@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to bbedit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/bbedit?hl=en If you have a feature request or would like to report a problem, please email supp...@barebones.com rather than posting to the group. Follow @bbedit on Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/bbedit
Re: changes to Find
On Aug 06, 2011, at 12:30, Bill Thayer wrote: No, I didn’t. It seems more of a bug than anything I need support with. __ Hey Bill, Support is where you *report* bugs. :) -- Best Regards, Chris -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the BBEdit Talk discussion group on Google Groups. To post to this group, send email to bbedit@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to bbedit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/bbedit?hl=en If you have a feature request or would like to report a problem, please email supp...@barebones.com rather than posting to the group. Follow @bbedit on Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/bbedit
Re: changes to Find
Hey Bill, On Aug 06, 2011, at 08:53, Bill Thayer wrote: The worst course reversal has been in the Find function, and I hope it'll be set right again in the next version. Specifically: I still prefer the old modal dialog. :) I used to do a Live Find on a document, then go to another document and do the same Live Find on it with no further ado. Now, I have to reënter the same thing all over again for each document. I'm not certain I like this either... But I haven't yet made up my mind. One thing you *can* do is type your live search string and then type Cmd-G or Return or click the next arrow. That will make the string active in the main find dialog, so Cmd-G will work globally. I think the way this works is a little confusing, but it's nothing I can't get used to. The Live Find also worked so that when I found the instance I was looking for I could just type over it, or arrow my way to what I wanted from there. No more! Now, I have to press Tab; to continue with the Live Find, I then have to go back to the Live Find box etc. Not sure what you're saying here. Live Search. Slap the Escape key. If you want to find again hit Cmd-E and then Cmd-G. Do what you want. A corollary of this new handling of Live Find: It used to be that when you were thru with one live find, you could proceed with another, by rekeying the key equivalent. Now if you do that, you still have the previous one to get rid of. It should be coming up preselected like it always did, so you can just type over the old search string. The two separate Find windows don't make much sense; all the more so that if you change one, the other is changed as well. (The two separate windows might make some sense if they allowed us to have one search in a document, the other over a set of document. Even then, not much.) What two separate *windows*? In the Find Patterns menu — mine has 133 patterns in it (just counted) — the Save line used to be at the top. Now, idiotically, it's at the bottom: forcing me to scroll all the way down the list just to save a pattern. ▸At least put it back at the top! Calling the developers idiots is not likely to motivate them to change anything. On the other hand there's nothing wrong with indicating that you don't like it as is. There's a fairly reasonable work-around. Open the Find dialog; Type Control-Shift-P; Type 's' or Option-Down-Arrow; Type 'Return' or 'SpaceBar'. I still would like to see regular expressions available in the Live Search field. -- Best Regards, Chris -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the BBEdit Talk discussion group on Google Groups. To post to this group, send email to bbedit@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to bbedit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/bbedit?hl=en If you have a feature request or would like to report a problem, please email supp...@barebones.com rather than posting to the group. Follow @bbedit on Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/bbedit
Re: changes to Find
The Live Find also worked so that when I found the instance I was looking for I could just type over it, or arrow my way to what I wanted from there. No more! Now, I have to press Tab; to continue with the Live Find, I then have to go back to the Live Find box etc. Not sure what you're saying here. To alternate the two kinds of search I now have to go thru extra steps. Live Search. Slap the Escape key. If you want to find again hit Cmd-E and then Cmd-G. Yes, of course. I use the live find to get me very quickly to a particular place in my document, from where I may make a real search; usually not. It should be coming up preselected like it always did, so you can just type over the old search string. I'm forgetting the old one already! Maybe it did. The two separate Find windows don't make much sense; all the more so that if you change one, the other is changed as well. (The two separate windows might make some sense if they allowed us to have one search in a document, the other over a set of document. Even then, not much.) What two separate *windows*? The single-document Find window and the multiple-document Find window. ▸Now, idiotically, it's at the bottom: Calling the developers idiots is not likely to motivate them to change anything. Quite right, and I didn’t. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the BBEdit Talk discussion group on Google Groups. To post to this group, send email to bbedit@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to bbedit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/bbedit?hl=en If you have a feature request or would like to report a problem, please email supp...@barebones.com rather than posting to the group. Follow @bbedit on Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/bbedit
Re: changes to Find
Oh, and Option-Down-Arrow — I replied too fast — is very nice, thank you!! B -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the BBEdit Talk discussion group on Google Groups. To post to this group, send email to bbedit@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to bbedit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/bbedit?hl=en If you have a feature request or would like to report a problem, please email supp...@barebones.com rather than posting to the group. Follow @bbedit on Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/bbedit
Re: changes to Find
Hey Bill, On Aug 06, 2011, at 13:47, Bill Thayer wrote: What two separate *windows*? The single-document Find window and the multiple-document Find window. Ah. I actually like this separation, because I don't often use the multi-file-search. Oh, and Option-Down-Arrow — I replied too fast — is very nice, thank you!! You bet. If you have good mnemonic names for your patterns you can type-select in the list with alacrity. -- Best Regards, Chris -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the BBEdit Talk discussion group on Google Groups. To post to this group, send email to bbedit@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to bbedit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/bbedit?hl=en If you have a feature request or would like to report a problem, please email supp...@barebones.com rather than posting to the group. Follow @bbedit on Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/bbedit
Re: Clipping and indent
Hmmm... my formatting seems to get lost in the email version of this..
I'll try again using tab to indicate my indent...
Given that I have an variable number of lines of text like such,
The rain in Spain
falls mainly in the plain
The fog in the bog
makes a slippery log
I'd like to make a clipping that will result in this,
{c:Chorus}
tab{soc}
tabThe rain in Spain
tabfalls mainly in the plain
tabThe fog in the bog
tabmakes a slippery log
tab{eoc}
My rough clipping is like this,
{c:Chorus}
tab{soc}
tab#SELECTIONORINSERTION#tab{eoc}
Which results in this,
{c:Chorus}
tab{soc}
tabThe rain in Spain
falls mainly in the plain
The fog in the bog
makes a slippery log
tab{eoc}
I've tried fiddling with #indent# but I realize now, that's not it's
purpose.
Any thoughts how to get the subsequent lines to indent to the position
of the first in the selection?
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the
BBEdit Talk discussion group on Google Groups.
To post to this group, send email to bbedit@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
bbedit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/bbedit?hl=en
If you have a feature request or would like to report a problem,
please email supp...@barebones.com rather than posting to the group.
Follow @bbedit on Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/bbedit
