ISPs that you like. I need a new one

[Steven Demonnin]

My Isp made some changes that make it impossible to use BBEdit (and Coda). 
 So I need a new one.  Which makes me very upset because I just renewed my 
subscription to the old one a month ago.  

One thing that would be nice, but not required, is in addition to PHP would 
be .net as well. 

I have heard good things about Gator.  And Bluehost. 

-- 
This is the BBEdit Talk public discussion group. If you have a feature request 
or need technical support, please email "supp...@barebones.com" rather than 
posting here. Follow @bbedit on Twitter: 
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"BBEdit Talk" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to bbedit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/bbedit/b9906670-7a57-4a4a-a1b7-fd97d6b619acn%40googlegroups.com.

Cats

[Steven Kleiman]

Hi,

I'm getting ctags references for places outside my BBEdit project (old 
archived versions) in a sibling directory. I've tried removing all the tags 
files in my tree (find ~ -name tags ...) even the siblings, but the 
references persist. How can I find where BBEdit is getting the tags from?

-- 
This is the BBEdit Talk public discussion group. If you have a 
feature request or would like to report a problem, please email
"supp...@barebones.com" rather than posting to the group.
Follow @bbedit on Twitter: 

--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"BBEdit Talk" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to bbedit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to bbedit@googlegroups.com.

Re: Using GREP to find all text from the insertion point to a particular string

[Steven Klein]

On Friday, May 23, 2014 11:46:37 AM UTC-4, flet...@cumuli.com wrote:

 It’s often easier to extract all the paths and then eliminate the 
 duplicates using Process Duplicate Lines.


That makes sense. Any suggestions about what GREP pattern I need to use to 
do that?

-- 
This is the BBEdit Talk public discussion group. If you have a 
feature request or would like to report a problem, please email
supp...@barebones.com rather than posting to the group.
Follow @bbedit on Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/bbedit

--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
BBEdit Talk group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to bbedit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to bbedit@googlegroups.com.

Re: Editor window (and file drawer) width problems - too wide

[Steven Lockton]

From http://bbeditextras.org/wiki/index.php?title=Tips_and_Tricks

 If you want to change the *default size of your editing window*, choose 
 Save default project window from the window menu.


It worked for me,

Cheers,
S

On Friday, March 8, 2013 9:59:52 AM UTC-8, Kevin Bolduan wrote:

 In 10.5.2 I've noticed recently that when I open a second document (which 
 causes the file drawer to appear) the editor window is often maximized 
 automatically to fill my screen (or close). This makes the file drawer 
 sidebar really wide and I always end up having to re-size it to make it 
 narrower. It seems to me that previous versions of BBEdit always remembered 
 the editor window size (including the file drawer) as I don't recall ever 
 having to manually resize anything to make my window look/feel right. I 
 looked in the preferences but didn't see anything that referred to the 
 default size for the editor.

 Is this just me? Is this a bug?

 -Kevin


-- 
-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the 
BBEdit Talk discussion group on Google Groups.
To post to this group, send email to bbedit@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
bbedit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/bbedit?hl=en
If you have a feature request or would like to report a problem, 
please email supp...@barebones.com rather than posting to the group.
Follow @bbedit on Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/bbedit

--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
BBEdit Talk group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to bbedit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

Re: grep help

[Steven]

As maarten guessed, I am trying to remove 560 instances of a date from an 
SQL file.   So I am looking for a way to grab everything from one comma to 
the other and including the quotes, all the numbers and dashes  and dots 
and replace it with one single comma,

Maarten's method didn't work either. It just goes beep and says not found.

On Monday, August 6, 2012 2:31:23 AM UTC-7, Terje Bless wrote:

 On Sun, Aug 5, 2012 at 6:20 AM, Steven  wrote: 
  I am trying to remove a date string from an SQL file. 
  
  I have ,'\d\d\d\d\-\d\d\-\d\d \d\d:\d\d:\d\d', as the string I wish to 
  replace with  , 
  
  It does not like that. 

 What does does not like that mean? That it finds no matches? Or do 
 you see something that indicates an error? 

  I assume I have to \- because - is a character grep uses 

 You should generally not need to escape the hyphen outside of 
 character classes (enclosed between [ and ]). 

 And to get help with this problem you really do need to provide an 
 example of the data you're trying to match against. 

 -link 


-- 
-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the 
BBEdit Talk discussion group on Google Groups.
To post to this group, send email to bbedit@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
bbedit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/bbedit?hl=en
If you have a feature request or would like to report a problem, 
please email supp...@barebones.com rather than posting to the group.
Follow @bbedit on Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/bbedit

grep help

[Steven]

I am trying to remove a date string from an SQL file.

I have ,'\d\d\d\d\-\d\d\-\d\d \d\d:\d\d:\d\d', as the string I wish to 
replace with  ,   

It does not like that.

I assume I have to \- because - is a character grep uses


Thanks

-- 
-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the 
BBEdit Talk discussion group on Google Groups.
To post to this group, send email to bbedit@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
bbedit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/bbedit?hl=en
If you have a feature request or would like to report a problem, 
please email supp...@barebones.com rather than posting to the group.
Follow @bbedit on Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/bbedit

does anyone have a script to recover web site on mountain lion

[Steven]

I upgraded to mountain lion.   Not a nice cat for web developing.   I can't 
access my files on my sites folder anymore.  Local host won't recognize my 
on computer web page.

PHP and MySqL still work.

I found a nice web page to that gives instructions on how to recover it, 
and I tried to follow them, but it stil won't 
work. 
http://coolestguyplanettech.com/downtown/install-and-configure-apache-mysql-php-and-phpmyadmin-osx-108-mountain-lion

When I first tried today to work with it, I got a 403 error.  Now I can't 
find it.

I do have a sites folder.   I do have a username.conf file.  

Any suggestions or script advice?

Thanks

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the 
BBEdit Talk discussion group on Google Groups.
To post to this group, send email to bbedit@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
bbedit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/bbedit?hl=en
If you have a feature request or would like to report a problem, 
please email supp...@barebones.com rather than posting to the group.
Follow @bbedit on Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/bbedit

Re: newbie grep issues

[Steven]

Yes, column two is what I am looking to remove.

What it looks like is 
insert into record(fknumber, primaryKeynumber,description, year,page_count) 
values ({a range from 1-600},{a range from 850-1800},'some text',{a range 
from 0-2012},{a range from 100-2200})  I want to make sure I remove only 
the second column and not any other.  Since the second column is a auto 
incremented primary key, (that got munged somehow during the last backup) I 
can delete that column and have it auto increment again fresh at 0

On Wednesday, July 25, 2012 6:41:41 AM UTC-7, Kendall Conrad wrote:

 I'll put out some ideas, but it's hard without seeing some example records 
 from the DB to match against. I'll assume a CSV style layout.

 Example record: 2, 82, 1034, 138

 find: ^(\d+),[ ]*\d{1,3},[ ]*(\d{3,4})
 replace: \1, \2

 This will remove column 2, which I believe is what you're asking for. The 
 ^ means it will match the start of the line.

 -K


 On Wednesday, July 25, 2012 1:10:42 AM UTC-4, Steven wrote:

 This is an updated question to my previous enquiry.  I am going to say 
 thanks to the really nice folks who answered my last question.

 The basic issue is I have a database file that I have updated irregularly 
 on two different systems.  One is consistently the more rational system, 
 but it has goofy id numbers because of the way it has been updates.

 The particular table I want to update will have two sets of numbers side 
 by side.  n^1, n^2.   N1 is a number of 1 to 3 digits.   N2 is three or 
 four digits.   I have other three digit or four digit sets in the database, 
 so I only want to update the three or four digit number next to the very 
 first number in the table, which can be one, two or three digits.

 I want to tell the machine to find the pair of numbers, eliminate the 
 second set so that the database when I drop and then rebuild the table the 
 second set will be set from the auto increment and will start at one, 
 rather than at 1400.

 Is there a way to do this?

 Thanks again for your courtesy.



-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the 
BBEdit Talk discussion group on Google Groups.
To post to this group, send email to bbedit@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
bbedit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/bbedit?hl=en
If you have a feature request or would like to report a problem, 
please email supp...@barebones.com rather than posting to the group.
Follow @bbedit on Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/bbedit

newbie grep issues

[Steven]

This is an updated question to my previous enquiry.  I am going to say 
thanks to the really nice folks who answered my last question.

The basic issue is I have a database file that I have updated irregularly 
on two different systems.  One is consistently the more rational system, 
but it has goofy id numbers because of the way it has been updates.

The particular table I want to update will have two sets of numbers side by 
side.  n^1, n^2.   N1 is a number of 1 to 3 digits.   N2 is three or four 
digits.   I have other three digit or four digit sets in the database, so I 
only want to update the three or four digit number next to the very first 
number in the table, which can be one, two or three digits.

I want to tell the machine to find the pair of numbers, eliminate the 
second set so that the database when I drop and then rebuild the table the 
second set will be set from the auto increment and will start at one, 
rather than at 1400.

Is there a way to do this?

Thanks again for your courtesy.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the 
BBEdit Talk discussion group on Google Groups.
To post to this group, send email to bbedit@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
bbedit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/bbedit?hl=en
If you have a feature request or would like to report a problem, 
please email supp...@barebones.com rather than posting to the group.
Follow @bbedit on Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/bbedit

Re: Brand new to the Grep function and searching desperately for a clue....

[steven d]

I just wanted to stop and say thanks for the help.   Very embarrassing
that the solution was so simple.   Thanks again

On May 3, 9:56 am, Patrick Woolsey pwool...@barebones.com wrote:
 On May 03, 2012, at 12:13, steven d wrote:

  I have a small library database I am trying to merge.   I want to
  introduce a dump from one library file into another.   I don't want to
  use the Book ids, a three digit number, so I want to pull all of them
  out.    I want to do a serch and replace using the grep option
  (checked) on my search.  I want to include the commas on either side
  of the search and reduce the replace to a single comma

  in my search box i have used ,/d/d/d, ,###,  /,/d/d/d/,

 You need to use backslashes rather than forward slashes; from the table on 
 page 164 of the current PDF manual:

   \d    any digit (0-9)

 so

 Find:       ,\d\d\d,
 Replace:    ,

 should do what you want. :-)

 Regards,

 Patrick Woolsey
 ==
 Bare Bones Software, Inc.                      http://www.barebones.com
 P.O. Box 1048, Bedford, MA 01730-1048

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the 
BBEdit Talk discussion group on Google Groups.
To post to this group, send email to bbedit@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
bbedit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/bbedit?hl=en
If you have a feature request or would like to report a problem, 
please email supp...@barebones.com rather than posting to the group.
Follow @bbedit on Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/bbedit

Brand new to the Grep function and searching desperately for a clue....

[steven d]

I have a small library database I am trying to merge.   I want to
introduce a dump from one library file into another.   I don't want to
use the Book ids, a three digit number, so I want to pull all of them
out.I want to do a serch and replace using the grep option
(checked) on my search.  I want to include the commas on either side
of the search and reduce the replace to a single comma

in my search box i have used ,/d/d/d, ,###,  /,/d/d/d/,

I am getting no where at all with this.

Thanks for any light you might shed in this dark spot.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the 
BBEdit Talk discussion group on Google Groups.
To post to this group, send email to bbedit@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
bbedit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/bbedit?hl=en
If you have a feature request or would like to report a problem, 
please email supp...@barebones.com rather than posting to the group.
Follow @bbedit on Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/bbedit

Re: reg; vs ® and creating shortcuts to submenu

[Steven Samuels]

You should be able to  create shortcuts to submenus in the Menus pane
of BBEdit's preferences.



On Nov 7, 3:01 pm, Linda 1anml...@gmail.com wrote:
 Sorry, that is what I thought that I said.  I want to use reg; and
 not the r with a circle around it and not the other way around. It
 is BBEdit that changes it to the r with a circle around it.

 Linda

 On Nov 7, 1:34 pm, Robert A. Rosenberg rar...@banet.net wrote:



  At 10:20 -0800 on 11/07/2010, Linda wrote about reg; vs and
  creating shortcuts to submenu:

  How can I prevent BBEdit from changing all of my reg; to when I use
  Tidy to Reflow Document?

  What is your declared character set for the page? If it is US-ASCII
  then this is an error since the character is not a valid character
  in that character set so the reg; entry must be used.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the 
BBEdit Talk discussion group on Google Groups.
To post to this group, send email to bbedit@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
bbedit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/bbedit?hl=en
If you have a feature request or would like to report a problem, 
please email supp...@barebones.com rather than posting to the group.
Follow @bbedit on Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/bbedit

Re: highlight Find All results in main doc, instead of displaying new window…

[Steven Samuels]

Copy and paste the results in the find window to a new document. Then
repeat the search in that document to highlight the  found text
again.  I would guess that you can automate this.



On Oct 18, 10:31 am, Rick rickbennet...@gmail.com wrote:
 Thanks, I never saw that; pretty cool. But, that isn't what I was
 looking for. 2 issues with Live Search: 1) No RegEx; 2) It does not
 highlight the hits in a way that they can be copied.

 Any other suggestions?

 On Oct 17, 10:13 am, Rich Siegel sie...@barebones.com wrote:



  On Saturday, October 16, 2010, Rick rickbennet...@gmail.com wrote:
   Is there anyway for the Find All results to be highlighted in the main
   doc, instead of being displayed in a new window.

  It sounds like Live Search would be what you're looking for.

  R.
  --
  Rich Siegel                                 Bare Bones Software, Inc.
  sie...@barebones.com                      http://www.barebones.com/

  Someday I'll look back on all this and laugh... until they sedate me.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the 
BBEdit Talk discussion group on Google Groups.
To post to this group, send email to bbedit@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
bbedit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/bbedit?hl=en
If you have a feature request or would like to report a problem, 
please email supp...@barebones.com rather than posting to the group.
Follow @bbedit on Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/bbedit

Re: Placing windows when comparing

[Steven Samuels]

The window  that has focus will go on the left.  I think that's a
reasonably predictable solution. Can you think of another?

Ste3ve





The immediate Arrange menu item will place the window with focus on
the left.  If you arrange the windows that way first (not by
dragging), then  in 9,5 at least, Compare two front documents will
keep them in that order.

Steve

On Sep 16, 10:12 am, Roddie Grant bbedit_l...@myword.co.uk wrote:
 I'm running 9.3.1 (can't upgrade to 9.5 'cos that would mean upgrading the
 OS too).

 Is there any way I can control which window goes on the left and right when
 comparing files?

 I have two files open side and side for manual inspection. To get more
 detail, I select Compare two front documents but the resulting arrangement
 swaps the windows. This is terribly confusing and almost resulted in loss of
 work just now - the new file was where I had the older file, and vice versa.

 Thanks

 Roddie Grant

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the 
BBEdit Talk discussion group on Google Groups.
To post to this group, send email to bbedit@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
bbedit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/bbedit?hl=en
If you have a feature request or would like to report a problem, 
please email supp...@barebones.com rather than posting to the group.
Follow @bbedit on Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/bbedit

Re: Placing windows when comparing

[Steven Samuels]

In 9,5, at least, tile the two windows in the order you desire with
the immediate Arrange command. (It places the window with focus on
the left.).  Then Compare two front documents will not change the
window order.

Steve

On Sep 16, 10:12 am, Roddie Grant bbedit_l...@myword.co.uk wrote:
 I'm running 9.3.1 (can't upgrade to 9.5 'cos that would mean upgrading the
 OS too).

 Is there any way I can control which window goes on the left and right when
 comparing files?

 I have two files open side and side for manual inspection. To get more
 detail, I select Compare two front documents but the resulting arrangement
 swaps the windows. This is terribly confusing and almost resulted in loss of
 work just now - the new file was where I had the older file, and vice versa.

 Thanks

 Roddie Grant

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the 
BBEdit Talk discussion group on Google Groups.
To post to this group, send email to bbedit@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
bbedit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/bbedit?hl=en
If you have a feature request or would like to report a problem, 
please email supp...@barebones.com rather than posting to the group.
Follow @bbedit on Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/bbedit

Re: Placing windows when comparing

[Steven Samuels]

In 9,5, at least, tile the two windows in the order you desire with
the immediate Arrange command. (It places the window with focus on
the left.).  That will  communicate to BBEdit how the two windows are
placed with respect to one another.  Then Compare two front
documents will keep the windows in the same left-right order.

Steve

On Sep 16, 10:12 am, Roddie Grant bbedit_l...@myword.co.uk wrote:
 I'm running 9.3.1 (can't upgrade to 9.5 'cos that would mean upgrading the
 OS too).

 Is there any way I can control which window goes on the left and right when
 comparing files?

 I have two files open side and side for manual inspection. To get more
 detail, I select Compare two front documents but the resulting arrangement
 swaps the windows. This is terribly confusing and almost resulted in loss of
 work just now - the new file was where I had the older file, and vice versa.

 Thanks

 Roddie Grant

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the 
BBEdit Talk discussion group on Google Groups.
To post to this group, send email to bbedit@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
bbedit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/bbedit?hl=en
If you have a feature request or would like to report a problem, 
please email supp...@barebones.com rather than posting to the group.
Follow @bbedit on Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/bbedit

Re: Placing windows when comparing

[Steven Samuels]

In 9,5, at least, tile the two windows first with the immediate
Arrange command. (It places the window with focus on the left.).
That will communicate to BBEdit how the two windows are placed with
respect to one another. Then Compare two front documents will keep
the windows in the same left-right order.

Steve


On Sep 16, 10:12 am, Roddie Grant bbedit_l...@myword.co.uk wrote:
 I'm running 9.3.1 (can't upgrade to 9.5 'cos that would mean upgrading the
 OS too).

 Is there any way I can control which window goes on the left and right when
 comparing files?

 I have two files open side and side for manual inspection. To get more
 detail, I select Compare two front documents but the resulting arrangement
 swaps the windows. This is terribly confusing and almost resulted in loss of
 work just now - the new file was where I had the older file, and vice versa.

 Thanks

 Roddie Grant

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the 
BBEdit Talk discussion group on Google Groups.
To post to this group, send email to bbedit@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
bbedit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/bbedit?hl=en
If you have a feature request or would like to report a problem, 
please email supp...@barebones.com rather than posting to the group.
Follow @bbedit on Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/bbedit

Re: Find Differences Report?

[Steven Seiller]

Wow! Not pretty, but certainly works. All these years of installing the
command line tool and I've never used it. Now I have reason to.

Thanks, Tim!


On Mon, May 3, 2010 at 8:15 AM, Tim Gray tg...@125px.com wrote:

 On May 03, 2010 at 08:06 AM -0700, Scout wrote:

 Is there a way to generate a text report of these differences? I'd
 like to see each of the results shown in the Differences window,
 followed by the new and old content.


 From the command line, try diff oldfile newfile | bbedit.  You can then
 just email them the text that is displayed in the bbedit document, or save
 it and mail the resulting text file as an attachment.

 It's a different format than BBEdit's tool, but it's pretty standard.  The
 oldfile differences will start with  while the new file's will start with
 .  Line numbers are given at the beginning of a block.

 Find out more on the command line by typing man diff

 --
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the BBEdit Talk
 discussion group on Google Groups.
 To post to this group, send email to bbedit@googlegroups.com
 To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
 bbedit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.combbedit%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com
 For more options, visit this group at
 http://groups.google.com/group/bbedit?hl=en
 If you have a feature request or would like to report a problem, please
 email supp...@barebones.com rather than posting to the group.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the 
BBEdit Talk discussion group on Google Groups.
To post to this group, send email to bbedit@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
bbedit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/bbedit?hl=en
If you have a feature request or would like to report a problem, 
please email supp...@barebones.com rather than posting to the group.

Re: Find Differences Report?

[Steven Seiller]

I tried the export. It only reports the contents of the differences window
which shows which lines have changed. It doesn't contain the actual content
itself, but I suppose it has its use.

-scout


On Mon, May 3, 2010 at 8:32 AM, Tim Gray tg...@125px.com wrote:

 On May 03, 2010 at 11:25 AM -0400, Steve Kalkwarf wrote:

 With the Differences window highlighted, you can choose File-Export to
 get a more friendly differences report.


 Good to know.  Thanks!


 --
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the BBEdit Talk
 discussion group on Google Groups.
 To post to this group, send email to bbedit@googlegroups.com
 To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
 bbedit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.combbedit%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com
 For more options, visit this group at
 http://groups.google.com/group/bbedit?hl=en
 If you have a feature request or would like to report a problem, please
 email supp...@barebones.com rather than posting to the group.


-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the 
BBEdit Talk discussion group on Google Groups.
To post to this group, send email to bbedit@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
bbedit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/bbedit?hl=en
If you have a feature request or would like to report a problem, 
please email supp...@barebones.com rather than posting to the group.

Re: Grats on 9.5 simple column question

[Steven W Riggins]

On Apr 28, 2010, at 4:47 PM, Toadling wrote:

 On Apr 28, 2010, at 8:38 AM, Steve Riggins wrote:
 
 I see BBEdit has a paste column feature, which does exactly what I
 need, but I'd like it while typing.  ie, instead of the text coming
 from the clipboard, it would come from the keyboard.
 
 Am I missing how to do this?
 
 You can accomplish this by using BBEdit's Prefix/Suffix Lines... command 
 from the Text menu.


Perfect and very nice, thank you!

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the 
BBEdit Talk discussion group on Google Groups.
To post to this group, send email to bbedit@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
bbedit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/bbedit?hl=en
If you have a feature request or would like to report a problem, 
please email supp...@barebones.com rather than posting to the group.

Color brackets in TeX language module

[Steven Samuels]

I request that closing and opening brackets { and } get coloring in
the TeX language module.


Steve

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the 
BBEdit Talk discussion group on Google Groups.
To post to this group, send email to bbedit@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
bbedit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/bbedit?hl=en
If you have a feature request or would like to report a problem, 
please email supp...@barebones.com rather than posting to the group.

To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
bbedit+unsubscribegooglegroups.com or reply to this email with the words 
REMOVE ME as the subject.

Re: Snow Leopard service: New BBEdit window using selection ?

[Steven Samuels]

A related free app that will open a temporary new BBEdit document,
albeit with the entire text, not a selection,  is QuickCursor (http://
www.hogbaysoftware.com/products/quickcursor/).

Saving from the temporary document will replace the text in the
original.  Closing just closes with no  discard or save dialog.

The source documents are not limited to BBEdit, but can include Safari
text entry windows (like the one I'm typing in now) and those of other
apps.

Steve


On Jan 4, 1:43 pm, Jim Correia corr...@barebones.com wrote:
 On Jan 4, 2010, at 1:01 PM, Andrew Davidson wrote:

  I find it incredibly handy when dealing with text scattered all over
  the apps to be able to use some of the new Snow Leopard services for
  the current selected text.

  For instance, there is a service called New TextEdit Window
  Containing Selection that opens TextEdit when I select that
  contextual menu item. This is like the New Text Document (with
  clipboard) menu item in BBEdit.

  It would be very nice if BBEdit supplied a similar service.

 BBEdit does offer such a service.

 It is currently named “New Window with Selection”.

 You also must enable it in System Preferences - Keyboard - Keyboard 
 Shortcuts - Services.

 Jim

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the 
BBEdit Talk discussion group on Google Groups.
To post to this group, send email to bbedit@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
bbedit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/bbedit?hl=en
If you have a feature request or would like to report a problem, 
please email supp...@barebones.com rather than posting to the group.

Re: Snow Leopard service: New BBEdit window using selection ?

[Steven Samuels]

QuickCursor  (http://www.hogbaysoftware.com/products/quickcursor/)
will open a temporary BBEdit document from many sources, allbeit with
the entire text. I'm typing in BBEdit right now, with the source being
Gmail's edit window in Safari. (It doesn't work in FireFox.)

Save from the temporary document replaces what was in the source,
and Close or Quit close without a save or discard dialog.

 Steve

On Jan 4, 1:43 pm, Jim Correia corr...@barebones.com wrote:
 On Jan 4, 2010, at 1:01 PM, Andrew Davidson wrote:

  I find it incredibly handy when dealing with text scattered all over
  the apps to be able to use some of the new Snow Leopard services for
  the current selected text.

  For instance, there is a service called New TextEdit Window
  Containing Selection that opens TextEdit when I select that
  contextual menu item. This is like the New Text Document (with
  clipboard) menu item in BBEdit.

  It would be very nice if BBEdit supplied a similar service.

 BBEdit does offer such a service.

 It is currently named “New Window with Selection”.

 You also must enable it in System Preferences - Keyboard - Keyboard 
 Shortcuts - Services.

 Jim

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the 
BBEdit Talk discussion group on Google Groups.
To post to this group, send email to bbedit@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
bbedit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/bbedit?hl=en
If you have a feature request or would like to report a problem, 
please email supp...@barebones.com rather than posting to the group.

Re: Removing unwanted language modules

[Steven Samuels]

Don't use the built-in pop-up. Just write a script that will show a
list of just your seven modules and let you to choose from among them
The code is simple:

--CODE BEGINS
tell application BBEdit
activate
tell front document
set my_mods to {TeX, Stata, (none)}
set go to choose from list my_mods with prompt Choose a 
Language..
if go is false then return
set source language to go
end tell
end tell
--CODE ENDS

-Steve

On Dec 10, 10:41 am, rwar...@googlemail.com rwar...@googlemail.com
wrote:
 I've got 48 language modules installed, including 3 I've added. I use
 about 7 in total. Is there anyway to uninstall the built-in modules,
 or at least keep them from showing up in the language pop-up? I'm
 happy to muck around with hacks, or suffer temporary instability while
 working out which are absolutely required
 Thanks
 Rob

 installed languages     68K Assembler (9.3.1 (2638))
 ActionScript (9.3.1 (2638))
 ANSI C (9.3.1 (2638))
 C++ (9.3.1 (2638))
 CSS (9.3.1 (2638))
 Data File (9.3.1 (2638))
 Datafile (version not available)
 Fortran (9.3.1 (2638))
 Fortran 9x (9.3.1 (2638))
 Gnuplot (version not available)
 Grep Replace Pattern (9.3.1 (2638))
 Grep Search Pattern (9.3.1 (2638))
 HTML (9.3.1 (2638))
 INI File (version not available)
 Java (9.3.1 (2638))
 JavaScript (9.3.1 (2638))
 JSP (9.3.1 (2638))
 Lasso (9.3.1 (2638))
 Log File (9.3.1 (2638))
 Lua (9.3.1 (2638))
 Make (version not available)
 Markdown (9.3.1 (2638))
 Matlab (2.3)
 Object Pascal (9.3.1 (2638))
 Objective-C (9.3.1 (2638))
 Objective-C++ (9.3.1 (2638))
 Perforce Specification (9.3.1 (2638))
 Perl (9.3.1 (2638))
 PHP (9.3.1 (2638))
 Python (9.3.1 (2638))
 Rez (9.3.1 (2638))
 Ruby (9.3.1 (2638))
 Ruby in HTML (9.3.1 (2638))
 Setext (8.0)
 Software Package Notes (9.3.1 (2638))
 SQL (Generic) (9.3.1 (2638))
 SQL (MS Transact) (9.3.1 (2638))
 SQL (MySQL) (9.3.1 (2638))
 SQL (PL/SQL) (9.3.1 (2638))
 SQL (PostgreSQL) (9.3.1 (2638))
 Strings File (9.3.1 (2638))
 Tcl (9.3.1 (2638))
 TeX (9.3.1 (2638))
 Unix Shell Script (9.3.1 (2638))
 VBScript (9.3.1 (2638))
 VectorScript (9.3.1 (2638))
 XML (9.3.1 (2638))
 YAML (9.3.1 (2638))

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the 
BBEdit Talk discussion group on Google Groups.
To post to this group, send email to bbedit@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
bbedit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/bbedit?hl=en
If you have a feature request or would like to report a problem, 
please email supp...@barebones.com rather than posting to the group.

Re: [ANN] BBEdit 9.2.1 Update available

[Steven Elliott]

It would be really great if a project would open documents left in the
drawer in the same order when the project was closed.  It shouldn't (and
doesn't) make any difference if my preference is to view the next document
and previous document in Display or History order.  When I open a project
the order of documents in a drawer should be the same as when I closed the
project.

Is that really difficult to do?

On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 8:47 AM, Rich Siegel sie...@barebones.com wrote:


 Good { morning, afternoon, evening },

 We are pleased to announce the release and immediate
 availability of BBEdit 9.2.1. This is a free update for anyone
 using BBEdit 9.0.x, 9.1.x, or 9.2. (including demo customers).

 This update contains fixes for reported problems.

 The update is available immediately by choosing Check for
 Updates from the BBEdit menu, or you may download it directly
 from the BBEdit updates page:

 http://www.barebones.com/support/bbedit/updates.html.

 Detailed change notes are available at
 http://www.barebones.com/support/bbedit/arch_bbedit921.html.

 Enjoy,

 R.
 --
 Rich Siegel Bare Bones Software, Inc.
 sie...@barebones.com  http://www.barebones.com/

 Someday I'll look back on all this and laugh... until they
 sedate me.


 



-- 
Steven Elliott
/**
* Systems Integrator - ACHDS
* Interactive Tecnologia, Lda.
* Corona de Tucson, VailArizona
*
* sip://251...@fwd.pulver.com
*/

--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups BBEdit Talk group.
To post to this group, send email to bbedit@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
bbedit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/bbedit?hl=en
If you have a specific feature request or would like to report a suspected (or 
confirmed) problem with the software, please email to supp...@barebones.com 
rather than posting to the group.
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---

Re: search/start at top: clarification

[Steven Samuels]

I agree it doesn't feel right; having a Menu item to provide a
function missing from the Search dialog seems unnatural.  A related
problem is that Find to End is  also not possible in the new find
dialog, and there is no menu command to replace it.

I think that a much simpler interface would be one that replicates
the  four choices in Nisus Writer Pro of where  to search and
replace:. 1) Entire File;  2) Selection;  3) Here to End;  4)
Here to Start;

 I don't think that implementing these as check boxes would make the
Find Dialog any more complicated than it is now.  (where Wrap Around
does nothing if selection is checked). If these four were the possible
choices of where to search, then the Find All and Replace All behavior
could be modified to mean, e.g. Find (replace)  all instances of the
search test within the chosen search area .


-Steve

On Nov 19, 4:40 pm, Peter Weil plw...@wisc.edu wrote:
 Thanks Rich. Is there any logic behind why Replace to End is the  
 _only_ Replace... command that is unavailable when thenSearch-Replace  
 dialog window is open?

 Barebones usually has good reasons for doing things a certain way, so  
 my mind is open. But right now it just doesn't feel right.

 Peter

 On Nov 19, 2008, at 2:45 PM, Rich Siegel wrote:





  On 11/19/08 at 11:01 AM, plw...@wisc.edu (Peter Weil) wrote:

  Wouldn't it make sense to add this command to the
 search-replace  dialog?

  Not for its own sake, no. We went to a great deal of effort to
  simplify the dialog UI for 9.0, as you may recall by contrasting
  the old dialog with the new windows. Adding buttons would be  
  counterproductive.

  I find it confusing and non-intuitive that Replace to End is
  disabled while thesearch-replace dialog is the current window,
  and  only gets enabled when you click back in your document window.

  Thank you for your feedback, we will consider it.

  R.
  --
  Rich Siegel                                 Bare Bones Software, Inc.
  sie...@barebones.com                      http://
 www.barebones.com/

  Someday I'll look back on all this and laugh... until they
  sedate me.

 --
 Peter Weil, Web Developer
 University Communications
 University of Wisconsin-Madison
 Phone: 608-262-6538
 Email: plw...@wisc.edu
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups BBEdit Talk group.
To post to this group, send email to bbedit@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
bbedit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/bbedit?hl=en
If you have a specific feature request or would like to report a suspected (or 
confirmed) problem with the software, please email to supp...@barebones.com 
rather than posting to the group.
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---

Alphabetize Saved Search Sets ?

[Steven Elliott]

BBEdit version 9.0.2 (1337)

Is it possible to get alphabetized lists in Search in dialog of Multi-File
Search as it was in v.8?  At the moment the Saved Search Sets is listed
arbitrarily, maybe FIFO which is a real mess.

Sorry to ask for a feature in a past version but I came to depend on nicely
alphabetized lists.
Site A classes
Site A js
Site A jsp
Site B WEB-INF
etc.

plz. thx.

Steven



--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups BBEdit Talk group.
To post to this group, send email to bbedit@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/bbedit?hl=en
If you have a specific feature request or would like to report a suspected (or 
confirmed) problem with the software, please email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
rather than posting to the group.
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---

Search in selection....!

[Steven Elliott]

In 9.0.2 it when you make a selection in the Mulit-File Search : Search in
dialog it ADDS the selection to any currently selected item...!

This is crazy and contrary to Apple HIG.

In fact if you option-click on an item in the BBEdit Mulit-File Search :
Search in dialog it DESELECTS all other items selected which is exactly the
opposite behavior for Apple.  I almost searched/replaced entire directories
I had not intention of...

Really dangerous stuff.

Please change this asap.

Thx.

Steven

--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups BBEdit Talk group.
To post to this group, send email to bbedit@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/bbedit?hl=en
If you have a specific feature request or would like to report a suspected (or 
confirmed) problem with the software, please email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
rather than posting to the group.
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---

How can I save search settings?

[Steven Samuels]

OS X 10.4.11 PB G4

How can I arrange that  the Matching Grep  box is checked by default
in the Find windows?  As of now, only the Wrap around box is checked
in a new document.

Thanks

Steve Samuels

--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups BBEdit Talk group.
To post to this group, send email to bbedit@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/bbedit?hl=en
If you have a specific feature request or would like to report a suspected (or 
confirmed) problem with the software, please email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
rather than posting to the group.
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---