Re: ® vs ® and creating shortcuts to submenu

[Steven Samuels]

You should be able to  create shortcuts to submenus in the Menus pane
of BBEdit's preferences.



On Nov 7, 3:01 pm, Linda <1anml...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Sorry, that is what I thought that I said.  I want to use ® and
> not the "r" with a circle around it and not the other way around. It
> is BBEdit that changes it to the "r" with a circle around it.
>
> Linda
>
> On Nov 7, 1:34 pm, "Robert A. Rosenberg"  wrote:
>
>
>
> > At 10:20 -0800 on 11/07/2010, Linda wrote about ® vs and
> > creating shortcuts to submenu:
>
> > >How can I prevent BBEdit from changing all of my ® to when I use
> > >Tidy to "Reflow Document"?
>
> > What is your declared character set for the page? If it is US-ASCII
> > then this is an error since the character is not a valid character
> > in that character set so the ® entry must be used.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the 
"BBEdit Talk" discussion group on Google Groups.
To post to this group, send email to bbedit@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
bbedit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at

If you have a feature request or would like to report a problem, 
please email "supp...@barebones.com" rather than posting to the group.
Follow @bbedit on Twitter: 

Re: version 9.6 find dialogue crash

[Steven Samuels]

I had a similar problem and a 9.6.1 pre-release build fixed it.  The
link to the latest is at the bottom of Rich Siegel's top post at:
http://groups.google.com/group/bbedit/browse_thread/thread/3f08061aa97bed00

Steve

On Nov 4, 8:18 am, Ptarmigan  wrote:
> hi
> I upgraded to v 9.6.
>
> Since when BBEdit crashes more or less every time I use Find. The
> crashes occur when I type the search pattern.
>
> Has a.o else had these crashes ?
>
> Is there a solution ?
>
> regards
>
> Tom

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the 
"BBEdit Talk" discussion group on Google Groups.
To post to this group, send email to bbedit@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
bbedit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at

If you have a feature request or would like to report a problem, 
please email "supp...@barebones.com" rather than posting to the group.
Follow @bbedit on Twitter: 

Re: highlight Find All results in main doc, instead of displaying new window…

[Steven Samuels]

Copy and paste the results in the find window to a new document. Then
repeat the search in that document to highlight the  found text
again.  I would guess that you can automate this.



On Oct 18, 10:31 am, Rick  wrote:
> Thanks, I never saw that; pretty cool. But, that isn't what I was
> looking for. 2 issues with Live Search: 1) No RegEx; 2) It does not
> highlight the hits in a way that they can be copied.
>
> Any other suggestions?
>
> On Oct 17, 10:13 am, Rich Siegel  wrote:
>
>
>
> > On Saturday, October 16, 2010, Rick  wrote:
> > > Is there anyway for the Find All results to be highlighted in the main
> > > doc, instead of being displayed in a new window.
>
> > It sounds like "Live Search" would be what you're looking for.
>
> > R.
> > --
> > Rich Siegel                                 Bare Bones Software, Inc.
> >                       
>
> > Someday I'll look back on all this and laugh... until they sedate me.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the 
"BBEdit Talk" discussion group on Google Groups.
To post to this group, send email to bbedit@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
bbedit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at

If you have a feature request or would like to report a problem, 
please email "supp...@barebones.com" rather than posting to the group.
Follow @bbedit on Twitter: 

Re: Replace to End

[Steven Samuels]

Although I like the behavior of the Find function in general, I
believe that the use of "Replace All" is illogical.  See my post at:
http://groups.google.com/group/bbedit/browse_thread/thread/afb750255a9cbb1/a3f3d870e0e626d7?

Steve

On Sep 16, 6:13 pm, Bull  wrote:
> I should have been more clear. I meant Search and Replace All. Replace
> All does the whole document whether or not Wrap Around is selected. If
> you sequentially Find, Replace, Find, Replace ... it does stop at the
> bottom when done.
>
> On Sep 16, 5:25 pm, Bull  wrote:
>
>
>
> > I always thought that if Wrap Around was not selected in the Find
> > dialog, BBEdit would search and replace just to the end of the
> > document. Not so.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the 
"BBEdit Talk" discussion group on Google Groups.
To post to this group, send email to bbedit@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
bbedit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at

If you have a feature request or would like to report a problem, 
please email "supp...@barebones.com" rather than posting to the group.
Follow @bbedit on Twitter: 

Re: Placing windows when comparing

[Steven Samuels]

In 9,5, at least, tile the two windows first with the immediate
"Arrange" command. (It places the window with focus on the left.).
That will communicate to BBEdit how the two windows are placed with
respect to one another. Then "Compare two front documents" will keep
the windows in the same left-right order.

Steve


On Sep 16, 10:12 am, Roddie Grant  wrote:
> I'm running 9.3.1 (can't upgrade to 9.5 'cos that would mean upgrading the
> OS too).
>
> Is there any way I can control which window goes on the left and right when
> comparing files?
>
> I have two files open side and side for manual inspection. To get more
> detail, I select "Compare two front documents" but the resulting arrangement
> swaps the windows. This is terribly confusing and almost resulted in loss of
> work just now - the new file was where I had the older file, and vice versa.
>
> Thanks
>
> Roddie Grant

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the 
"BBEdit Talk" discussion group on Google Groups.
To post to this group, send email to bbedit@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
bbedit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at

If you have a feature request or would like to report a problem, 
please email "supp...@barebones.com" rather than posting to the group.
Follow @bbedit on Twitter: 

Re: Placing windows when comparing

[Steven Samuels]

In 9,5, at least, tile the two windows in the order you desire with
the immediate "Arrange" command. (It places the window with focus on
the left.).  That will  communicate to BBEdit how the two windows are
placed with respect to one another.  Then "Compare two front
documents" will keep the windows in the same left-right order.

Steve

On Sep 16, 10:12 am, Roddie Grant  wrote:
> I'm running 9.3.1 (can't upgrade to 9.5 'cos that would mean upgrading the
> OS too).
>
> Is there any way I can control which window goes on the left and right when
> comparing files?
>
> I have two files open side and side for manual inspection. To get more
> detail, I select "Compare two front documents" but the resulting arrangement
> swaps the windows. This is terribly confusing and almost resulted in loss of
> work just now - the new file was where I had the older file, and vice versa.
>
> Thanks
>
> Roddie Grant

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the 
"BBEdit Talk" discussion group on Google Groups.
To post to this group, send email to bbedit@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
bbedit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at

If you have a feature request or would like to report a problem, 
please email "supp...@barebones.com" rather than posting to the group.
Follow @bbedit on Twitter: 

Re: Placing windows when comparing

[Steven Samuels]

In 9,5, at least, tile the two windows in the order you desire with
the immediate "Arrange" command. (It places the window with focus on
the left.).  Then "Compare two front documents" will not change the
window order.

Steve

On Sep 16, 10:12 am, Roddie Grant  wrote:
> I'm running 9.3.1 (can't upgrade to 9.5 'cos that would mean upgrading the
> OS too).
>
> Is there any way I can control which window goes on the left and right when
> comparing files?
>
> I have two files open side and side for manual inspection. To get more
> detail, I select "Compare two front documents" but the resulting arrangement
> swaps the windows. This is terribly confusing and almost resulted in loss of
> work just now - the new file was where I had the older file, and vice versa.
>
> Thanks
>
> Roddie Grant

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the 
"BBEdit Talk" discussion group on Google Groups.
To post to this group, send email to bbedit@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
bbedit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at

If you have a feature request or would like to report a problem, 
please email "supp...@barebones.com" rather than posting to the group.
Follow @bbedit on Twitter: 

Re: Placing windows when comparing

[Steven Samuels]

The window  that has focus will go on the left.  I think that's a
reasonably predictable solution. Can you think of another?

Ste3ve





The immediate "Arrange" menu item will place the window with focus on
the left.  If you arrange the windows that way first (not by
dragging), then  in 9,5 at least, "Compare two front documents" will
keep them in that order.

Steve

On Sep 16, 10:12 am, Roddie Grant  wrote:
> I'm running 9.3.1 (can't upgrade to 9.5 'cos that would mean upgrading the
> OS too).
>
> Is there any way I can control which window goes on the left and right when
> comparing files?
>
> I have two files open side and side for manual inspection. To get more
> detail, I select "Compare two front documents" but the resulting arrangement
> swaps the windows. This is terribly confusing and almost resulted in loss of
> work just now - the new file was where I had the older file, and vice versa.
>
> Thanks
>
> Roddie Grant

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the 
"BBEdit Talk" discussion group on Google Groups.
To post to this group, send email to bbedit@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
bbedit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at

If you have a feature request or would like to report a problem, 
please email "supp...@barebones.com" rather than posting to the group.
Follow @bbedit on Twitter: 

Re: comment utility

[Steven Samuels]

I've written a generic comment/uncomment script for many languages,
based on earlier Comment/Uncomment  scripts by  Dataninja (John
Gardiner)..  The script is available here: 
http://dataninja.wordpress.com/all-articles/

Open the script up; find the section that lists code extensions and
comment symbols, and add the extensions and comment pairs of your
choice; save the script in BBE's script folder  and assign it a
keyboard shortcut.

Steve


On Jun 9, 5:50 pm, Patrick Woolsey  wrote:
> Ptarmigan  sez:
>
> >Could someone tell me how to use the comment utility from menu or
> >palette to comment out php ?
>
> Markup -> Utilities -> Comment applies only HTML comments.
>
> For PHP (and everything else :-), please use Text -> Un/Comment.
>
> Regards,
>
>  Patrick Woolsey
> ==
> Bare Bones Software, Inc.                        
> P.O. Box 1048, Bedford, MA 01730-1048

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the 
"BBEdit Talk" discussion group on Google Groups.
To post to this group, send email to bbedit@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
bbedit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/bbedit?hl=en
If you have a feature request or would like to report a problem, 
please email "supp...@barebones.com" rather than posting to the group.

Color brackets in TeX language module

[Steven Samuels]

I request that closing and opening brackets { and } get coloring in
the TeX language module.


Steve

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the 
"BBEdit Talk" discussion group on Google Groups.
To post to this group, send email to bbedit@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
bbedit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/bbedit?hl=en
If you have a feature request or would like to report a problem, 
please email "supp...@barebones.com" rather than posting to the group.

To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
bbedit+unsubscribegooglegroups.com or reply to this email with the words 
"REMOVE ME" as the subject.

Re: Open file outline to locate current file

[Steven Samuels]

To open a finder window to the current directory, I command-click on
the file title.  If I then want to do something there in  Terminal, I
call up the free app  ">cd..to" with LaunchBar.

-Steve

On Jan 19, 10:42 pm, Charlie Garrison  wrote:
> Good afternoon,
>
> On 19/01/10 at 1:39 PM -0800, tqwhite  wrote:
>
> >A lot of the time, I want to look at other files in the same
> >directory. I would love to, in fact I find it crippling that I can't,
> >tell bbedit to expand the project directory to show me that file.
>
> I'm not really clear what you're trying to do and what's not
> working. BBEdit can open folders/directories as (temporary)
> project windows. And there are heaps of ways to get those open.
>
> - drag folder in Finder to BBEdit
> - terminal command: bbedit path/to/dir
> - BBEdit: File->Open
> - BBEdit: File->Open Selection
>
> I'm sure the list goes on. I can't tell from your explanation
> which might work best for you. The two I use most often are the
> bbedit command in Terminal, and the File -> Open Selection command.
>
> I hope that helps.
>
> Charlie
>
> --
>     Ꮚ Charlie Garrison ♊ 
>     〠 PO Box 141, Windsor, NSW 2756, Australia
>
> O< ascii ribbon campaign - stop html mail 
> -www.asciiribbon.orghttp://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc1855.txt
-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the 
"BBEdit Talk" discussion group on Google Groups.
To post to this group, send email to bbedit@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
bbedit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/bbedit?hl=en
If you have a feature request or would like to report a problem, 
please email "supp...@barebones.com" rather than posting to the group.

Re: Snow Leopard service: "New BBEdit window using selection" ?

[Steven Samuels]

QuickCursor  (http://www.hogbaysoftware.com/products/quickcursor/)
will open a temporary BBEdit document from many sources, allbeit with
the entire text. I'm typing in BBEdit right now, with the source being
Gmail's edit window in Safari. (It doesn't work in FireFox.)

"Save" from the temporary document replaces what was in the source,
and "Close" or "Quit" close without a "save or discard" dialog.

 Steve

On Jan 4, 1:43 pm, Jim Correia  wrote:
> On Jan 4, 2010, at 1:01 PM, Andrew Davidson wrote:
>
> > I find it incredibly handy when dealing with text scattered all over
> > the apps to be able to use some of the new Snow Leopard services for
> > the current selected text.
>
> > For instance, there is a service called "New TextEdit Window
> > Containing Selection" that opens TextEdit when I select that
> > contextual menu item. This is like the "New Text Document (with
> > clipboard)" menu item in BBEdit.
>
> > It would be very nice if BBEdit supplied a similar service.
>
> BBEdit does offer such a service.
>
> It is currently named “New Window with Selection”.
>
> You also must enable it in System Preferences -> Keyboard -> Keyboard 
> Shortcuts -> Services.
>
> Jim

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the 
"BBEdit Talk" discussion group on Google Groups.
To post to this group, send email to bbedit@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
bbedit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/bbedit?hl=en
If you have a feature request or would like to report a problem, 
please email "supp...@barebones.com" rather than posting to the group.

Re: Snow Leopard service: "New BBEdit window using selection" ?

[Steven Samuels]

A related free app that will open a temporary new BBEdit document,
albeit with the entire text, not a selection,  is QuickCursor (http://
www.hogbaysoftware.com/products/quickcursor/).

Saving from the temporary document will replace the text in the
original.  Closing just closes with no  "discard" or "save" dialog.

The source documents are not limited to BBEdit, but can include Safari
text entry windows (like the one I'm typing in now) and those of other
apps.

Steve


On Jan 4, 1:43 pm, Jim Correia  wrote:
> On Jan 4, 2010, at 1:01 PM, Andrew Davidson wrote:
>
> > I find it incredibly handy when dealing with text scattered all over
> > the apps to be able to use some of the new Snow Leopard services for
> > the current selected text.
>
> > For instance, there is a service called "New TextEdit Window
> > Containing Selection" that opens TextEdit when I select that
> > contextual menu item. This is like the "New Text Document (with
> > clipboard)" menu item in BBEdit.
>
> > It would be very nice if BBEdit supplied a similar service.
>
> BBEdit does offer such a service.
>
> It is currently named “New Window with Selection”.
>
> You also must enable it in System Preferences -> Keyboard -> Keyboard 
> Shortcuts -> Services.
>
> Jim

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the 
"BBEdit Talk" discussion group on Google Groups.
To post to this group, send email to bbedit@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
bbedit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/bbedit?hl=en
If you have a feature request or would like to report a problem, 
please email "supp...@barebones.com" rather than posting to the group.

Re: Removing unwanted language modules

[Steven Samuels]

Don't use the built-in pop-up. Just write a script that will show a
list of just your seven modules and let you to choose from among them
The code is simple:

--CODE BEGINS
tell application "BBEdit"
activate
tell front document
set my_mods to {"TeX", "Stata", "(none)"}
set go to choose from list my_mods with prompt "Choose a 
Language.."
if go is false then return
set source language to go
end tell
end tell
--CODE ENDS

-Steve

On Dec 10, 10:41 am, "rwar...@googlemail.com" 
wrote:
> I've got 48 language modules installed, including 3 I've added. I use
> about 7 in total. Is there anyway to uninstall the built-in modules,
> or at least keep them from showing up in the language pop-up? I'm
> happy to muck around with hacks, or suffer temporary instability while
> working out which are absolutely required
> Thanks
> Rob
>
> installed languages     68K Assembler (9.3.1 (2638))
> ActionScript (9.3.1 (2638))
> ANSI C (9.3.1 (2638))
> C++ (9.3.1 (2638))
> CSS (9.3.1 (2638))
> Data File (9.3.1 (2638))
> Datafile (version not available)
> Fortran (9.3.1 (2638))
> Fortran 9x (9.3.1 (2638))
> Gnuplot (version not available)
> Grep Replace Pattern (9.3.1 (2638))
> Grep Search Pattern (9.3.1 (2638))
> HTML (9.3.1 (2638))
> INI File (version not available)
> Java (9.3.1 (2638))
> JavaScript (9.3.1 (2638))
> JSP (9.3.1 (2638))
> Lasso (9.3.1 (2638))
> Log File (9.3.1 (2638))
> Lua (9.3.1 (2638))
> Make (version not available)
> Markdown (9.3.1 (2638))
> Matlab (2.3)
> Object Pascal (9.3.1 (2638))
> Objective-C (9.3.1 (2638))
> Objective-C++ (9.3.1 (2638))
> Perforce Specification (9.3.1 (2638))
> Perl (9.3.1 (2638))
> PHP (9.3.1 (2638))
> Python (9.3.1 (2638))
> Rez (9.3.1 (2638))
> Ruby (9.3.1 (2638))
> Ruby in HTML (9.3.1 (2638))
> Setext (8.0)
> Software Package Notes (9.3.1 (2638))
> SQL (Generic) (9.3.1 (2638))
> SQL (MS Transact) (9.3.1 (2638))
> SQL (MySQL) (9.3.1 (2638))
> SQL (PL/SQL) (9.3.1 (2638))
> SQL (PostgreSQL) (9.3.1 (2638))
> Strings File (9.3.1 (2638))
> Tcl (9.3.1 (2638))
> TeX (9.3.1 (2638))
> Unix Shell Script (9.3.1 (2638))
> VBScript (9.3.1 (2638))
> VectorScript (9.3.1 (2638))
> XML (9.3.1 (2638))
> YAML (9.3.1 (2638))

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the 
"BBEdit Talk" discussion group on Google Groups.
To post to this group, send email to bbedit@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
bbedit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/bbedit?hl=en
If you have a feature request or would like to report a problem, 
please email "supp...@barebones.com" rather than posting to the group.

Re: search/start at top: clarification

[Steven Samuels]

I agree it doesn't feel right; having a Menu item to provide a
function missing from the Search dialog seems unnatural.  A related
problem is that "Find to End" is  also not possible in the new find
dialog, and there is no menu command to replace it.

I think that a much simpler interface would be one that replicates
the  four choices in Nisus Writer Pro of where  to search and
replace:. 1) "Entire File";  2) "Selection";  3) "Here to End";  4)
"Here to Start";

 I don't think that implementing these as check boxes would make the
Find Dialog any more complicated than it is now.  (where "Wrap Around"
does nothing if selection is checked). If these four were the possible
choices of where to search, then the Find All and Replace All behavior
could be modified to mean, e.g. "Find (replace)  all instances of the
search test within the chosen search area .


-Steve

On Nov 19, 4:40 pm, Peter Weil  wrote:
> Thanks Rich. Is there any logic behind why "Replace to End" is the  
> _only_ Replace... command that is unavailable when thenSearch-Replace  
> dialog window is open?
>
> Barebones usually has good reasons for doing things a certain way, so  
> my mind is open. But right now it just doesn't feel right.
>
> Peter
>
> On Nov 19, 2008, at 2:45 PM, Rich Siegel wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > On 11/19/08 at 11:01 AM, plw...@wisc.edu (Peter Weil) wrote:
>
> >> Wouldn't it make sense to add this command to the
> >>search-replace  dialog?
>
> > Not for its own sake, no. We went to a great deal of effort to
> > simplify the dialog UI for 9.0, as you may recall by contrasting
> > the old dialog with the new windows. Adding buttons would be  
> > counterproductive.
>
> >> I find it confusing and non-intuitive that Replace to End is
> >> disabled while thesearch-replace dialog is the current window,
> >> and  only gets enabled when you click back in your document window.
>
> > Thank you for your feedback, we will consider it.
>
> > R.
> > --
> > Rich Siegel                                 Bare Bones Software, Inc.
> >                        >www.barebones.com/>
>
> > Someday I'll look back on all this and laugh... until they
> > sedate me.
>
> --
> Peter Weil, Web Developer
> University Communications
> University of Wisconsin-Madison
> Phone: 608-262-6538
> Email: plw...@wisc.edu
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "BBEdit Talk" group.
To post to this group, send email to bbedit@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
bbedit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/bbedit?hl=en
If you have a specific feature request or would like to report a suspected (or 
confirmed) problem with the software, please email to "supp...@barebones.com" 
rather than posting to the group.
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---

Re: Search in selection....!

[Steven Samuels]

 I agree with Steven.   I  work a lot with  "Saved Search Sets" and
tend to ignore "Recent Folders".  It's frustrating to check a saved
set only to find that I am searching the previous selected saved set
as well (even though it isn't checked).   Suggestion: Make "Add
Previous Search to Current  Search" a Preference setting that can be
turned on and off.

-Steve

On Oct 27, 6:19 pm, Steven Elliott  wrote:
> On 10/27/08 13:40, "Patrick James"  wrote:
>
> > I don't follow this point you have raised. It is quite possible I have
> > misunderstood. I have 9.0.2 (1342) and for me the selection of files
> > tosearchin the Multi-File:Searchin dialogue is by check boxes and
> > I would expect them to add selection to any currently selected ones. I
> > might very well have interpreted this wrongly of course.
>
> Maybe this will explain it better.
>
> Because the new Multi-FileSearchnow does not close after eachsearchany
> Recent Folders you have previously selected remain selected if you go back
> to perform anothersearch.  In v8 and before the window closed and upon
> reopening deselected all SavedSearchand Recent Folders so this wasn't an
> issue.  As a result in v9 if you select another SavedSearchitem it is
> ADDED to the previoussearchparameters.
>
> IMHO this behavior is counter intuitive.  Simply selecting another 
> SavedSearchor even another Recent Folder item should deselect any existing
> checked items.  We all know (and have come to expect) that if we
> command-click on items in a folder even non-contiguous items can be selected
> (added to the list of selected items).  Even multiple-select HTML elements
> behave this way.  If we simply click on items in the directory each item
> will deselect any previously selected items.  This is the behavior I would
> expect to find in the newSearchin: dialog.  To select multiple items you
> need to hold down the command key (sorry I called it the option key before).
>
> I realize that in theSearchin: dialog they are checkboxes but the paradigm
> is so similar that it seems counter intuitive to me know and especially so
> when you consider that to deselect all items except the one you have
> selected you need to hold down the command key!
>
> Does that make any more sense?  I know it is a small point but if you were
> accustomed to how things worked in v8 and you do a Replace all thinking you
> are only operating on one folder when in fact you are operating on multiple
> folders the operation can be catastrophic.
>
> Beyond that the behavior of v9 issearchdependent.   Only if yoursearch
> returned a result does the SavedSearchget deselected and the equivalent
> Recent Folder selection automatically selected...!  The automagic
> de-selection and creation of a Recent Folder item is hard to deal with
> because you need to remember what path your SavedSearchitem points to in
> order to back translate the path.  The Recent Folder item creation when a
> SavedSearchitem is selected isn't completely different from v8 but it is
> different in that in v8 the Recent Folders were created at the moment the
> Saved Seach was selected and not dependent on whether thesearchwas
> successful or not.
>
> Finally, the SavedSearchitems in v9 are not alphabetized as they were in
> v8 and before; simple organization and something I had come to depend on.
> IMHO the whole experience of the new Multi-FileSearchis messy and
> non-intuitive.
>
> make sense?
>
> Steven
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "BBEdit Talk" group.
To post to this group, send email to bbedit@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
bbedit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/bbedit?hl=en
If you have a specific feature request or would like to report a suspected (or 
confirmed) problem with the software, please email to "supp...@barebones.com" 
rather than posting to the group.
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---

How can I save search settings?

[Steven Samuels]

OS X 10.4.11 PB G4

How can I arrange that  the Matching "Grep"  box is checked by default
in the Find windows?  As of now, only the "Wrap around" box is checked
in a new document.

Thanks

Steve Samuels

--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "BBEdit Talk" group.
To post to this group, send email to bbedit@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/bbedit?hl=en
If you have a specific feature request or would like to report a suspected (or 
confirmed) problem with the software, please email to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" 
rather than posting to the group.
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---

Repeated Error -35 Messages

[Steven Samuels]

Version 9.0 OS X 10.4.11  PB G4

In the course or ordinary edting I get the following intermittent
error message intermittently.

"An attempt was made to read or write to a volume which does not exist
(MacOS Error code: -35)"

I am usually not reading a file or writing to one at the time. No
network volumes are mounted and no backup programs are running.

Version 9.0 is a treat--mode-less search and the ability to edit files
in the Browser window alone make the upgrade a bargain.

Thanks




--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"BBEdit Talk" group.
To post to this group, send email to bbedit@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/bbedit?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---