Mad Cow Update

2003-07-03 Thread Eric Myren
Canadian authorities are now saying that the said cow may have 
originated in the US with a large shipment 20,000+ pregnant cows that 
came to canada in 1997 before the US ban on feeding cattle remnants.
Sounds like they are just trying to come up with an excuse to open up 
the border.

peace
eric
___
BDNow mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
You can unsubscribe or change your options at:
http://lists.envirolink.org/mailman/listinfo/bdnow


Re: Mad cow update ect...

2003-06-04 Thread Turtle Bend
Title: Re: Mad cow update ect...





Lloyd You wrote last week

Hi Markess


You've instanced Johnies disease - we have it rampant in south east aussie at the moment (sip)
It has ABSOLUTELY NOTHING to do with meat protein feeding - these are sheep run on open grazing country - grass fed animals! The fact that there is a huge soil imbalance problem (calcium is under 20% CEC in many of the worst areas) has escaped the scrutiny of officialdom, some farmers in the fine wool areas are loosing over 20% of their flock annually, while others that test infected but have decent soil test numbers are not experiencing mortalities much different than uninfected. Its a transmissable disease and there is a vaccine, no one has wanted to look at the soil mineral side of this . common factors are : extremely low calcium; acidity sufficient to make available aluminium high (enough to be detrimental to pasture growth); a long 50+years history of superphosphate fertiliser (high cadmium in early days) 


My point  understanding of dis-eases that in corporate micro-organisms  possible most parasites is that they (the secondary organisms) are only trying to clean out the garbage in the primary bodies.
Whether this is garbage from rendered parts or poisoned range feed is beside the point. Toxicity of food in this case is being handled by several organisms.

SEs have no secondary organism involvement - only the primary! 


(from one of your earlier posts)The other  most important Manganese soars was downed Japanese bombers during the war providing the tribes with their first metal pots  pans. The metal a Alu  Mng alloy
???I thought the metal used in aircraft was aluminium - magnesium alloy - manganese is used extensively in steel making to bring hardness/toughness but aircraft are mostly made of the silver metals? 

Seeing neither of us know first hand on this one we will have to just smile and realize we all collect the data to support our personal belief system as you pointed out with your hipperoony observation!

Blessings
In love  Light
Markess
 





___
BDNow mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
You can unsubscribe or change your options at:
http://lists.envirolink.org/mailman/listinfo/bdnow


Re: Mad cow update ect...

2003-05-29 Thread Lucia Ruedenberg Wright
I don't know much about the origins of Mad Cow, but in reading the reply
that was posted, I was not clear on whether or not Purdey was saying it
was the result of radioactivity?

Lucia

On Wed, 28 May 2003, Allan Balliett wrote:

 Thanks for this profound post, Markess.
 
 I remind everyone: if you want to discuss this the origins of Mad Cow 
 and other 'wasting diseases' with Mark Purdey, please post any 
 questions you have to the list. This discussion will be driven by 
 your questions and comments and will not, I am told, fly into your 
 mouth like roast pigeon.
 
 This is a great opportunity. I pray that we as a group do not miss it.
 
   -Allan
 ___
 BDNow mailing list
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 You can unsubscribe or change your options at:
 http://lists.envirolink.org/mailman/listinfo/bdnow
 

-- 
-lucia
   http://lrw.net
-
No, my friend, the way to have good and safe government, is not to trust
it all to one, but to divide it among the many, distributing to every one
exactly the functions he is competent to.  It is by dividing and
subdividing these republics from the national one down through all its
subordinations, until it ends in the administration of every man's farm by
himself; by placing under every one what his own eye may superintend, that
all will be done for the best. 
-- Thomas Jefferson, to Joseph Cabell, 1816
_

()  ascii ribbon campaign - against html mail
/\- against microsoft attachments


___
BDNow mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
You can unsubscribe or change your options at:
http://lists.envirolink.org/mailman/listinfo/bdnow


Re: Mad cow update ect...

2003-05-29 Thread Allan Balliett
Just for clarification:

I think the argument for pasture-fed ruminates has already been won 
in the biological farming movement. I do not think that anyone in 
this movement who has been paying attention thinks that it is ok to 
feed by-products (proteins) or grains, for that matter, to grazing 
animals.

I agree that we live in a self-made cesspool, a world we've thrown 
out of balance. (Anyone sense that the recent earthquakes were 
brought on by the big bombs the US dropped in IRAQ?) We also know 
that it is a problem that is not going to be readily solved because 
there is so little agreement about its sources or solutions.

The mad cow situation, however, presents not so much a threat to 
human health as   it does to the future of farming, with governments 
given martial law-type powers to destroy herds. Purdey's research 
reveals that there is no need to destroy these herds and that the 
origins of mad cow (what do we need to say? the ACUTE origins of Mad 
Cow Disease...) are in inappropriate government policies (too much 
insecticide applied to already imbalanced herds) I'm not too 
optimistic that there is anything we can do about what the 
governments are doing in response to Mad Cow, primarily because none 
of us are clear on what their true motivations are. What I think is 
clear is that even through everything is broken, Mad Cow represents a 
particularly disconcerting disruption of 'health as usual' and I, for 
one, feel much more comfortable with Purdey's explanation than I do 
with the 'official' one.

As for quoting Steiner, well, he also said that farms might taste 
better with peppers on them, didn't he? What was he getting at??

-Allan
___
BDNow mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
You can unsubscribe or change your options at:
http://lists.envirolink.org/mailman/listinfo/bdnow


Re: Mad cow update ect...

2003-05-29 Thread Peter Michael Bacchus
One of the issues that interests me is why there is a need to feed more
protien and so much so that meat meal is considered as a source for
ruminants with such long digestive tracts? Is it because the application of
watersoluble fertilisers particulally nitrogen is reducing the protien
levels in plants? My partner Gill Cole is working on some aspects of this
for her Master of Science thesis right now. Lettuces have been the test
plant and various mixes and matches of the preparations have been used. She
has a list of other questions that I could pass on to anyone who would like
to discuss them.
From what I've taken from Mark Purdies dissertation we should see that
copper zinc and selenium should be well supplied in the soil and the major
cations should be well balanced too, plus active use of the Steiner
remedies.
One might also ask why the Warble fly is such a pest and would peppering be
part of the remedy?
Peter.
- Original Message -
From: Allan Balliett [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Biodynamic Food and Farming Discussion [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, May 29, 2003 3:29 PM
Subject: Re: Mad cow update ect...


 Just for clarification:

 I think the argument for pasture-fed ruminates has already been won
 in the biological farming movement. I do not think that anyone in
 this movement who has been paying attention thinks that it is ok to
 feed by-products (proteins) or grains, for that matter, to grazing
 animals.
 The mad cow situation, however, presents not so much a threat to
 human health as   it does to the future of farming, with governments
 given martial law-type powers to destroy herds. Purdey's research
 reveals that there is no need to destroy these herds and that the
 origins of mad cow (what do we need to say? the ACUTE origins of Mad
 Cow Disease...) are in inappropriate government policies (too much
 insecticide applied to already imbalanced herds) I'm not too
 optimistic that there is anything we can do about what the
 governments are doing in response to Mad Cow, primarily because none
 of us are clear on what their true motivations are. What I think is
 clear is that even through everything is broken, Mad Cow represents a
 particularly disconcerting disruption of 'health as usual' and I, for
 one, feel much more comfortable with Purdey's explanation than I do
 with the 'official' one.

 As for quoting Steiner, well, he also said that farms might taste
 better with peppers on them, didn't he? What was he getting at??

 -Allan
 ___
 BDNow mailing list
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 You can unsubscribe or change your options at:
 http://lists.envirolink.org/mailman/listinfo/bdnow

___
BDNow mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
You can unsubscribe or change your options at:
http://lists.envirolink.org/mailman/listinfo/bdnow


Re: Mad cow update ect...

2003-05-29 Thread Allan Balliett
Lettuces have been the test
plant and various mixes and matches of the preparations have been used. She
has a list of other questions that I could pass on to anyone who would like
to discuss them.
I'd like to see these! -Allan
___
BDNow mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
You can unsubscribe or change your options at:
http://lists.envirolink.org/mailman/listinfo/bdnow


Re: Mad cow update ect...

2003-05-29 Thread Allan Balliett
One might also ask why the Warble fly is such a pest and would peppering be
part of the remedy?
Peter.
If you follow the dollar trail, massive amounts of pesticides were 
applied to 'the entire british herd' at 3 times the normal 
application rate. It appears to me that the move to eradicate the fly 
was a move to put a lot of public money into someone's pockets. All 
the more its about money because the cover up is motivated by the 
damage suits that would follow if truth were known.

It's scarey business to see government, big business, and the press 
working so well together against the interest of man and Nature.

Oh, please add this to my last dozen posts: IMHO

-Allan
___
BDNow mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
You can unsubscribe or change your options at:
http://lists.envirolink.org/mailman/listinfo/bdnow


Re: Mad cow update ect...

2003-05-29 Thread Lucia Ruedenberg Wright
On Wed, 28 May 2003, Allan Balliett wrote:

 (Anyone sense that the recent earthquakes were 
 brought on by the big bombs the US dropped in IRAQ?)

YES. definitly had that thought.
weren't there also earthquakes after they bombed Afghanistan?

___
BDNow mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
You can unsubscribe or change your options at:
http://lists.envirolink.org/mailman/listinfo/bdnow


MAD COW UPDATE ( 2) Mark Purdey theory

2003-02-23 Thread Alberto Machado

 My ola to the gruop , with all my respect I am a A Brazilian Organic
Veterinarian , who recently finished the treining in a Biodynamic .

In relation with the mad cow disease are you aware of   Mark
Purdey theory  - High-dose exposure to systemic phosmet insecticide modifies
the phosphatidylinositol anchor on the prion protein: the origins of new
variant transmissible spongiform encephalopathies? and his biography and
eco-detective journeys to the centre of scientific truth
http://www.markpurdey.com/


Alberto ( Sorry for my spelling )



Re: MAD COW UPDATE ( 2) Mark Purdey theory

2003-02-23 Thread Allan Balliett
Thanks, Alberto. Mark Purdey spoke with Will Winter at the 
Mid-Atlantic Biodynamic Food and Farming Conference Oct 3-5 this past 
year right here in Virginia, USA. He has also been a 'guest speaker' 
on BD Now! on a couple of occasions.

I find the article of great interest, aside from what Mark's 
investigations have revealed.

And, I appreciate your willingness to share what you know.

What do you make of this particular story, after reading it carefully?

-Allan



MAD COW UPDATE

2003-02-21 Thread Allan Balliett
From today's Washington Post:

'Mad Cow Disease' Deemed Unlikely In Deaths of Game-Eating Hunters


Hunters who feasted on their prey at a cabin in northern Wisconsin -- 
and later died of brain diseases -- probably did not contract mad 
cow disease from their meaty banquets, U.S. health officials said 
yesterday.

Two of the men who died were diagnosed with Creutzfeldt-Jakob 
disease, a human version of mad cow disease, but it was likely a 
naturally occurring form, the Centers for Disease Control and 
Prevention reported.

We didn't find any association, said Vincent Hsu, an epidemiologist 
at the CDC's National Center for Infectious Diseases.

Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease, or CJD, occurs naturally in about 1 in a 
million people. It is incurable and fatal, and produces holes in the 
brain that lead to dementia and death.

Since the 1990s, a second form has been found in people, almost all 
of them in Britain, and linked to an outbreak of a related disease in 
cattle called bovine spongiform encephalopathy, or mad cow disease.

Doctors have found that people can contract a variant of CJD from 
eating BSE-infected beef. About 130 people, mostly in Britain, have 
died from the new variant CJD.

Elk and deer in parts of the United States contract a related disease 
called chronic wasting disease, and federal health officials 
investigated when hunters in Wisconsin developed CJD.

-- Compiled from reports by the Associated Press and Reuters