Re: Subscriber exodus

2003-03-09 Thread Peter Michael Bacchus
its got me streached too!!
Peter.
- Original Message -
From: Rambler Flowers LTD [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, March 08, 2003 9:40 AM
Subject: Re: Subscriber exodus



 - Original Message -
 From: Garuda [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Saturday, March 08, 2003 8:38 AM
 Subject: Re: Subscriber exodus


  I wish to support this being a BD agriculture list and not a political
  hotbed ( to which I have added from time to time)
  GA

  ME Too It is still our busy season here down under and there are too many
 off subjects . I am close to  leaving this list myself.
Regards Tony R




Re: Subscriber exodus

2003-03-09 Thread John Buckley



Somehow the threat of war, the responses 
here, the reactions, can perhaps be seen in a 'bio-dynamic' way. As if the 
'farm' has 'enjoyed' the invasion of something undesired. If indeed the 
farm is to be viewed as a single organism, and it's health viewed as a single 
issue, then the divergence here, the irritating stuff (for each to decide) is a 
normal progression, a normal event(s). If a fungal eruption occurs or a 
flock of crows picks the corn, or whatever, do we merely stand in the field and 
shake our fist at heaven or do we appreciate what is happening and respond 
positively. I believe that what we are seeing here on this list is an 
excellent opportunity to learn the depth and value of bio-dynamics, and I await, 
the ever involved student. Thank you everyone for your input, love and 
care. We can turn our backs but we can never move away.

John Buckley
Mountains W North Carolina

- Original Message - 
From: Peter Michael 
Bacchus 
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Sunday, March 09, 2003 2:38 AM
Subject: Re: Subscriber exodus
its got me streached too!!Peter.- Original Message 
-From: "Rambler Flowers LTD" [EMAIL PROTECTED]To: 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent: 
Saturday, March 08, 2003 9:40 AMSubject: Re: Subscriber 
exodus - Original Message - From: 
"Garuda" [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 
Saturday, March 08, 2003 8:38 AM Subject: Re: Subscriber 
exodus  I wish to support this being a BD 
agriculture list and not a political  hotbed ( to which I have added 
from time to time)  GA ME Too It is still our 
busy season here down under and there are too many off subjects . I am 
close to leaving this list myself. Regards Tony 
R


Re: Subscriber exodus

2003-03-09 Thread Gil Robertson
Hi! Doug, Jane  Allan,
Sorry, but I am with Doug, although not necessarily of the same
political outlook. (I do not know what his interests are!)
I have been ill for a few days and went to the farm to get away from
things and was thus computer free. I came back to the normal stack of
emails and have gone through and dealt with all the non BD Now ones.
With ninety six to go, I am faced with the situation:- do I just dump
the whole lot or do I take the time to discard the many Jane posts, to
see if any one is still posting any thing related to BD or if it is just
spam.
Jane, much of what you post I agree with and have already read from
other sources. I know your Government is less than desirable. Much of
what you post is rewritten from rewritten material from old sources.
Those who follow world events have had this stuff in the source material
ages ago.
Allan, I really like information on BD and related subjects. I really
respect many of the regular contributors to BD Now. Some posts are vital
for the purpose of  getting information on BD to those interested in BD.
Over time I have passed the details of the list on to many others who
are also interested in BD, but as far as I know, none are still on the
list, largely because of the volume of unrelated material.
Allan, as SYSOP, I believe you must make the decision about the nature
of the list. Is it about BD and related subjects or is it not? I would
see related subjects including areas like soil science, homoeopathy,
radionics, dowsing, organics, marketing propagation, seed collection,
alternatives to chemicals, GM issues, water quality, machinery, climate
etc. This is in addition to BD and the broader Stiener area.
I believe your current policy  is limiting access to the information on
this list, as many people are not prepared to wade through the non-BD
material to find the core material.
With the greatest respect.
Gil
Doug  Jay Stewart wrote

 Greg Willis is so right in his observation that it is the very
 proponents of BD who do the most to prevent its general acceptance.
 snip
 Well, I am sorry to see BDNow die.  I will miss the periodic gems I
 find here.  Hopefully someone else will start a new BD email list.




Re: Subscriber exodus

2003-03-08 Thread Rambler Flowers LTD

- Original Message -
From: Garuda [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, March 08, 2003 8:38 AM
Subject: Re: Subscriber exodus


 I wish to support this being a BD agriculture list and not a political
 hotbed ( to which I have added from time to time)
 GA

 ME Too It is still our busy season here down under and there are too many
off subjects . I am close to  leaving this list myself.
   Regards Tony R



Subscriber exodus

2003-03-07 Thread Doug Jay Stewart


From: Allan Balliett [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Thanks again, Jane. We lost several members of BD Now! last week due to 
your persistent efforts to support the illusion of 'conspiracies.' (They 
unsubscribed)

Seeing a beautiful portraite of President Bush on the cover of today's 
Washington Post makes me feel that perhaps it is I who is deluded, though. 
-Allan
Allan,
Some of us have seen this (political) delusion on your part for some time.  
And I do not say this with any animosity intended.  As an example, Noam 
Chomsky is a very clever and skilled writer which makes his pieces look and 
seem very good.  However, when one looks deeper at his facts, the 
deception becomes apparent.

Subscriber exodus:

What I feared and expressed in an email appeal to Jane (and Allan) several 
weeks ago to separate political posts from BD is gradually coming to pass.  
People who joined BDNow for info and inspiration on biodynamics are quitting 
in disgust.

Greg Willis is so right in his observation that it is the very proponents of 
BD who do the most to prevent its general acceptance.

Those of us who have a different view of world events find that on this list 
there is ONE CORRECT POLITICAL VIEW ONLY!  It is that espoused by Jane (and 
seemingly seconded by Allan)!  She is so attached to this view that she is 
blind to the fact that it is destroying BDNow!

I could post volumes to counter Jane's posts, but have chosen not to since 
my, apparently mistaken, assumption was that this list is for BD ag related 
info.

Well, I am sorry to see BDNow die.  I will miss the periodic gems I find 
here.  Hopefully someone else will start a new BD email list.

Peace,
Doug








_
The new MSN 8: advanced junk mail protection and 2 months FREE*  
http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail



Re: Subscriber exodus

2003-03-07 Thread Garuda
I wish to support this being a BD agriculture list and not a political
hotbed ( to which I have added from time to time)
GA
- Original Message -
From: Doug  Jay Stewart [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, March 08, 2003 7:14 AM
Subject: Subscriber exodus




 From: Allan Balliett [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 Thanks again, Jane. We lost several members of BD Now! last week due to
 your persistent efforts to support the illusion of 'conspiracies.' (They
 unsubscribed)

 Seeing a beautiful portraite of President Bush on the cover of today's
 Washington Post makes me feel that perhaps it is I who is deluded,
though.
 -Allan

 Allan,
 Some of us have seen this (political) delusion on your part for some time.
 And I do not say this with any animosity intended.  As an example, Noam
 Chomsky is a very clever and skilled writer which makes his pieces look
and
 seem very good.  However, when one looks deeper at his facts, the
 deception becomes apparent.

 Subscriber exodus:

 What I feared and expressed in an email appeal to Jane (and Allan) several
 weeks ago to separate political posts from BD is gradually coming to pass.
 People who joined BDNow for info and inspiration on biodynamics are
quitting
 in disgust.

 Greg Willis is so right in his observation that it is the very proponents
of
 BD who do the most to prevent its general acceptance.

 Those of us who have a different view of world events find that on this
list
 there is ONE CORRECT POLITICAL VIEW ONLY!  It is that espoused by Jane
(and
 seemingly seconded by Allan)!  She is so attached to this view that she is
 blind to the fact that it is destroying BDNow!

 I could post volumes to counter Jane's posts, but have chosen not to since
 my, apparently mistaken, assumption was that this list is for BD ag
related
 info.

 Well, I am sorry to see BDNow die.  I will miss the periodic gems I find
 here.  Hopefully someone else will start a new BD email list.

 Peace,
 Doug









 _
 The new MSN 8: advanced junk mail protection and 2 months FREE*
 http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail