Re: [beagleboard] Asterisk server on BBB

2014-08-16 Thread Artie Lekstutis
In case anyone else is interested in running an Asterisk server on the 
BBB I've found that http://www.beaglebone-asterisk.org performs fairly 
well. Even better than on one of my older x86 systems. After doing some 
testing I'm ready for an initial deployment. Looks like it should be 
able to handle at least 6 simultaneous calls, which is more than I'll 
ever need. I'll post updates if I find anything interesting (good or bad).


It's running on a 64G micro-SD card:
Ubuntu 14.04 LTS
Asterisk 11.8.0
FreePBX 2.11.0.35

Later,
Artie

On 7/30/2014 1:34 AM, William Hermans wrote:
Running debian the BBB can run lxde, but it wont be like a current  
x86 system experience. But for comparison, the BBB has the rPI trumped 
in all but graphics.



On Tue, Jul 29, 2014 at 9:18 PM, Artie Lekstutis ar...@lekstutis.com 
mailto:ar...@lekstutis.com wrote:


I'm looking for a replacement for my antique Trixbox Asterisk
servers using a BBB solution. One is a home system, the other is a
small retail operation. Both in reliable operation since 2008. Run
part time by a someone with a long term interest in Linux and
communications systems (me).

The distribution http://www.beaglebone-asterisk.org/ is currently
my focus. Is there anything I should know about it (good or bad)?
Is there anything better for such use?

My occupation is embedded systems, not IT. I'd prefer to have a
reasonable GUI to manage the configuration where possible. FreePbx
seems to provide that in place of Trixbox. Not that I'm afraid of
scripting or re-building kernels, I just have other things to do too.

Thanks!
Artie Lekstutis

-- 
For more options, visit http://beagleboard.org/discuss

--- You received this message because you are subscribed to the
Google Groups BeagleBoard group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it,
send an email to beagleboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
mailto:beagleboard%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


--
For more options, visit http://beagleboard.org/discuss
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
Groups BeagleBoard group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send 
an email to beagleboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com 
mailto:beagleboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.

For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


--
For more options, visit http://beagleboard.org/discuss
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups BeagleBoard group.

To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to beagleboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


[beagleboard] Asterisk server on BBB

2014-07-29 Thread Artie Lekstutis
I'm looking for a replacement for my antique Trixbox Asterisk servers 
using a BBB solution. One is a home system, the other is a small retail 
operation. Both in reliable operation since 2008. Run part time by a 
someone with a long term interest in Linux and communications systems (me).


The distribution http://www.beaglebone-asterisk.org/ is currently my 
focus. Is there anything I should know about it (good or bad)? Is there 
anything better for such use?


My occupation is embedded systems, not IT. I'd prefer to have a 
reasonable GUI to manage the configuration where possible. FreePbx seems 
to provide that in place of Trixbox. Not that I'm afraid of scripting or 
re-building kernels, I just have other things to do too.


Thanks!
Artie Lekstutis

--
For more options, visit http://beagleboard.org/discuss
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups BeagleBoard group.

To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to beagleboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


Re: [beagleboard] Powering the BBB

2014-03-05 Thread Artie Lekstutis

On 3/5/2014 9:07 PM, doog wrote:


in hopes of explaining what is being talked around is this.
You want 5V from 11V so there's 6V difference. Those linear
regulators will give you the 5V at some current level(let's
say 1A for simplicity). So you get 5V at 1A and that's
5Watts(5V*1A) but that 1A of current is also involved in that
6V drop from 11V to get you 5V. The energy/power wasted in
that 6V drop is calculated by the current of your load( 1A )
times the drop( 6V ) which is 6Watts in the example.


This is why Gerald is correct in his statement that the linear 
regulator is wasteful since in the example you only need 5W and have 
6W of waste so have a total energy cost of 11W. A better solution 
would be a DC-DC converter and you can get those on amazon with free 
shipping from china(if you can wait) for less than $10. The take the 
input power turn it into a AC signal which can then be chopped and 
reassembled into a lower voltage with little energy loss.


for example:
http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B008BHAOQO

Doug

The most important detail here is the 6W of waste heat. A linear 
regulator regulates the Voltage by generating heat. The heat generated 
in a linear regulator is measured in Watts and can be calculated as the 
Voltage dropped across the regulator times the current through it. From 
this discussion I understand that to be 6W (6V * 1A). The regulator will 
have a specification for the temperature rise from the die to case (or 
ambient) per Watt. A common LM340 in a TO-220 case, for example, has a 
4C/W junction/case and 54C/W junction/ambient rating. In this example 
that means with no heatsink the junction will be 324C over ambient 
(54C/W * 6W). The 24V limitation is not the factor here, it's 
dissipating the heat. You will need a heatsink capable of disipating at 
least 17.6C/W to ambient just to keep the LM340 TO-220 from reaching its 
rated 150C limitation with an ambient temperature of 20C (20C + (4 + 
17.6C/W) * 6W = 150C). At elevated operating temperatures you will need 
a better heatsink than that. I don't know what regulator you are using 
as you have not stated that publicly yet, nor do I know the maximum 
temperature for your application so I can't guess what size heatsink you 
will actually need.


Short answer: Use a big heat sink or a switcher.

Artie



--
For more options, visit http://beagleboard.org/discuss
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups BeagleBoard group.

To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to beagleboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.


Re: [beagleboard] Feasibility of Industrial BBB?

2014-01-24 Thread Artie Lekstutis
Arrow sells a 'White Label' version of the BBB that is made by 
Circuitco. It's meant for commercial use and has no Beagle markings. I 
have a Power Point presentation from Arrow (U.S.) claiming that they are 
the exclusive 'provider':

http://parts.arrow.com/item/detail/circuitco/am335xbblk-system

Not sure of the temperature range.

I'm evaluating using that board in a small quantity commercial product.

I have no financial interests in Arrow.

Artie Lekstutis

On 1/24/2014 3:53 PM, O'Toole, Aaron CIV NSWC IHEODTD, D25 wrote:

From looking through the forums, it looks like it is safe to say the BBB is 
not rated to operate below 0 F. However, I really like the BBB and I would like to 
use it in a project that has strict temperature requirements for -20 F to 140 F 
(-29 C to 60 C) operational temperatures.

I've seen a few people make quick mention of unofficial industrial BBB clones. 
Can someone provide more information of anything like that...or comment on the 
feasibility of me going through and finding drop-in replacements for any 
components that do not meet these specs?

Thanks,
Aaron








--
For more options, visit http://beagleboard.org/discuss
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups BeagleBoard group.

To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to beagleboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.


[beagleboard] Toolchain for Qt embedded development on BBB

2013-11-30 Thread Artie Lekstutis
I'm trying to put together a Qt embedded development environment under 
Ubuntu 12.04 for the BBB based on 
http://derekmolloy.ie/beaglebone/qt-with-embedded-linux-on-the-beaglebone/. 
It references the toolchain 
http://angstrom-distribution.org/toolchains/angstrom-2011.03-i686-linux-armv7a-linux-gnueabi-toolchain-qte-4.6.3.tar.bz2 
which is not currently available. Does anyone know where I can get a 
copy from? The copy in archive.org is broken, and 
http://angstrom-distribution.org/toolchains/ has been unavailable for a 
few weeks now.


Or can someone recommend an alternate detailed tutorial for installing a 
Qt embedded development environment  under Ubuntu for the BBB that 
doesn't need www.angstrom-distribution.org?


So far the only c++ cross platform IDE I've gotten to (almost) work for 
the BBB is Eclipse. Just having issues getting it to remote debug.


Thanks!
Artie

--
For more options, visit http://beagleboard.org/discuss
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups BeagleBoard group.

To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to beagleboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.