Re: [SlimDevices: Beta] Which Transporter firmware should be default in 7.1?
A poll associated with this post was created, to vote and see the results, please visit http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=47055 Question: Which Transporter firmware should be default in 7.1? - Firmware 37 (stable, no new features) - Firmware 40 (unstable, new features) Hi, i have no problems* and never had any with FW40. So i've voted to keep it the default. But as long as this version is available without to much fiddling (editing transporter.version is no problem for me) my vote is not really strong... kind regards, Markus *just to make it clear: the way i use the transporter -- schiegl schiegl's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=6654 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=47055 ___ beta mailing list beta@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/beta
Re: [SlimDevices: Beta] Transporter went dead with monday night's build
On Apr 30, 2008, at 6:55 PM, Andy Grundman wrote: > > On Apr 30, 2008, at 6:01 PM, max.spicer wrote: >> >> mherger;297373 Wrote: I guess I could try editing the transporter.version file... but I >>> just can't be fussed. >>> >>> It's worth the minute it takes. Just replace the three instances of >>> 40 >>> with 37. Restart. Done. >> >> Agreed, but I think the question of why FW40 is still in 7.1 is >> valid. >> It's never going to be released, so why not pull it now until its >> replacement is ready for testing. It's certainly a barrier to people >> testing 7.1 properly and generates a large volume of posts from >> confused people. I now that a few find FW40 useful, but they >> definitely appear to be in the majority. Wouldn't it be better to >> leave both .bins in the repository, but to default >> transporter.version >> to 37 rather than 40? > > Because some people wanted to use the features in 40. > > Perhaps these people need to be the ones who have to go to the extra > effort of changing the version file. Maybe I'll start a poll. :) Please vote here: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=47055 ___ beta mailing list beta@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/beta
[SlimDevices: Beta] Which Transporter firmware should be default in 7.1?
A poll associated with this post was created, to vote and see the results, please visit http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=47055 Question: Which Transporter firmware should be default in 7.1? - Firmware 37 (stable, no new features) - Firmware 40 (unstable, new features) We currently include both firmware 37 and 40 in 7.1, but 40 is set as the default. Since 40 contains a number of bugs, perhaps we should make the default 37, and force anyone who wants to test the new features in 40 make changes to the transporter.version file. -- andyg andyg's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=3292 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=47055 ___ beta mailing list beta@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/beta
Re: [SlimDevices: Beta] Which Transporter firmware should be default in 7.1?
A poll associated with this post was created, to vote and see the results, please visit http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=47055 Question: Which Transporter firmware should be default in 7.1? - Firmware 37 (stable, no new features) - Firmware 40 (unstable, new features) Note this only applies to the 7.1 nightly builds, we'll sort this out for real by release time. :) -- andyg andyg's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=3292 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=47055 ___ beta mailing list beta@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/beta
Re: [SlimDevices: Beta] Transporter went dead with monday night's build
On Apr 30, 2008, at 6:01 PM, max.spicer wrote: > > mherger;297373 Wrote: >>> I guess I could try editing the transporter.version file... but I >> just >>> can't be fussed. >> >> It's worth the minute it takes. Just replace the three instances of >> 40 >> with 37. Restart. Done. > > Agreed, but I think the question of why FW40 is still in 7.1 is valid. > It's never going to be released, so why not pull it now until its > replacement is ready for testing. It's certainly a barrier to people > testing 7.1 properly and generates a large volume of posts from > confused people. I now that a few find FW40 useful, but they > definitely appear to be in the majority. Wouldn't it be better to > leave both .bins in the repository, but to default transporter.version > to 37 rather than 40? Because some people wanted to use the features in 40. Perhaps these people need to be the ones who have to go to the extra effort of changing the version file. Maybe I'll start a poll. :) ___ beta mailing list beta@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/beta
Re: [SlimDevices: Beta] Transporter went dead with monday night's build
mherger;297373 Wrote: > > I guess I could try editing the transporter.version file... but I > just > > can't be fussed. > > It's worth the minute it takes. Just replace the three instances of 40 > with 37. Restart. Done. Agreed, but I think the question of why FW40 is still in 7.1 is valid. It's never going to be released, so why not pull it now until its replacement is ready for testing. It's certainly a barrier to people testing 7.1 properly and generates a large volume of posts from confused people. I now that a few find FW40 useful, but they definitely appear to be in the majority. Wouldn't it be better to leave both .bins in the repository, but to default transporter.version to 37 rather than 40? Max -- max.spicer What do we want? Smoother Analog VU with FLAC! When do we want it? At the soonest possible convenience to the hard-working yet undervalued Slim Developers. ;-) max.spicer's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=23 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=47005 ___ beta mailing list beta@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/beta
Re: [SlimDevices: Beta] SC7 trouble with Leopard 10.5.1
Hi again, Followed the instructions on page 3 in this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=45486&highlight=mouth&page=3 BUT I just moved my "SqueeseCenter" folder found in "application support" instead of deleting it. Then I * downloaded the latest official release, got it installed, verified that the server started as expected. * Stopped it and updated it to latest nightly release and verified that the server started as expected. * Stopped it, replaced the new "SqueezeCenter" folder in Application Support with the original one * Restarted the server - NO SUCCES! * Restarted the server again - SUCCES! Now all plugins and prefs seems to back to what they were before I did not reboot my Mac during the process. Conclusion: It's probably the Cache giving Mac-users a headache. Possible cause: Inproper shutdown of Mac (e.g. Power Failure) Possible solution: Having a script that trashes the SqueezeCenter cache at startup Will now start checking up that everything works..AND add my SqueezeCenter folder to my backup list :-) Hope for a permanent fix for this problem soon. /Sune -- Sune Sune's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=8823 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=40730 ___ beta mailing list beta@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/beta
Re: [SlimDevices: Beta] SC7 trouble with Leopard 10.5.1
Nope :-( And I cannot even re-apply the combo-update => my box is DEAD, and I had so much hoped to show it off to my foreign friends during the weekend. Guess I'll have to go through the basic cleaning of the current installation. Hope I won't loose too much - I've spent hours making it work like a charm - *sigh*. My wife is now back to hating the thing and insisting on us getting an AirPort Express instead. Wonder what goes wrong... /S. -- Sune Sune's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=8823 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=40730 ___ beta mailing list beta@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/beta
Re: [SlimDevices: Beta] Transporter went dead with monday night's build
> I guess I could try editing the transporter.version file... but I just > can't be fussed. It's worth the minute it takes. Just replace the three instances of 40 with 37. Restart. Done. -- Michael ___ beta mailing list beta@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/beta
Re: [SlimDevices: Beta] Transporter went dead with monday night's build
I'm a bit stuck with this 7.1/Transporter firmware 40 bit too. I'd like to try 7.1 but firmware 40 turns my Transporter into a mute too. I guess I could try editing the transporter.version file... but I just can't be fussed. I, like Sean, have other things to do. MC -- ModelCitizen Somewhere, something incredible is waiting to be known. SB+ > Bryston 4BSST > PMC OB1s. http://www.last.fm/user/ModelCitizen ModelCitizen's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=446 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=47005 ___ beta mailing list beta@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/beta
Re: [SlimDevices: Beta] Transporter went dead with monday night's build
Robin Bowes;297319 Wrote: > JJZolx wrote: > > Firmware 40 strikes again. It's a shame that no one at SD has time > any > > more to fix the software problems with Transporter. > > Wwould you care to tell us on what basis you arrived at the conclusion > > expressed in your statement above? Firmware 40 came out a full two months ago, with immediate reports of problems, but there's been no follow up beta firmware to date. Apparently Sean is doing the firmware, but he's stated that he's busy with other things. http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=45030#post285343 -- JJZolx Jim JJZolx's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=10 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=47005 ___ beta mailing list beta@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/beta
Re: [SlimDevices: Beta] Transporter went dead with monday night's build
JJZolx wrote: > Firmware 40 strikes again. It's a shame that no one at SD has time any > more to fix the software problems with Transporter. Jim, Please engage your brain before typing. fw40 was an early release for testing, ie. to find problems. Well fancy that - problems were found, so it won't be officially released. Ever notice that Squeezebox firmware releases aren't always consecutive? That's because some versions are not officially released. Transporter firmware development is continuing and a new version will be released in due course. Wwould you care to tell us on what basis you arrived at the conclusion expressed in your statement above? R. ___ beta mailing list beta@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/beta
Re: [SlimDevices: Beta] Transporter went dead with monday night's build
You can edit the transporter.version file to tell it which fw to use, then just find the right .bin and put it in the firmware dir. -- radish radish's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=77 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=47005 ___ beta mailing list beta@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/beta
Re: [SlimDevices: Beta] 7.1 - New JS code for Default skin - SqueezeJS
Looks like the right pane is refreshing for me now. Only limited testing done yet, but all passed so far. Great!!! On IE7, Windows XP -- dwilliams01 dwilliams01's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=10988 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=46423 ___ beta mailing list beta@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/beta
Re: [SlimDevices: Beta] 7.1 version confusion
dean;296548 Wrote: > > On Apr 28, 2008, at 10:35 AM, Matt Wise wrote: > > > Someone likely made a checkin right around midnight, probably during > > the build processes... its rare, but this does happen on occasion. > > It's happened again. Is it possible it's something in the build order rather than a race between updates and builds? -- Millwood Millwood's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=3600 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=46925 ___ beta mailing list beta@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/beta
Re: [SlimDevices: Beta] 7.1 - New JS code for Default skin - SqueezeJS
Sorry Michael, I'm away from base at the moment and cannot check until thursday night (UK time). Maybe someone else can confirm a) if they saw the problem and b) if it's been fixed with the nightly 19261. Dan -- chinablues chinablues's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=7955 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=46423 ___ beta mailing list beta@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/beta
Re: [SlimDevices: Beta] Transporter went dead with monday night's build
gharris999;297092 Wrote: > I'm using fm 40 and, aside from the excessive knob degaussing, it's > working fine. I did have to program the xilinx, though. It's been pretty terrible for me. I frequently have to resort to xilinx reprogramming in order to get my transporter to produce sound and/or in order to get the knob working again. Actually, enough is enough - can I force it to not use fw40? I need to run the 7.1+ branches in order to test and develop and am normally happy to take the rough with the smooth, but I'm fed up of not being able to rely on my transporter! Max -- max.spicer What do we want? Smoother Analog VU with FLAC! When do we want it? At the soonest possible convenience to the hard-working yet undervalued Slim Developers. ;-) max.spicer's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=23 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=47005 ___ beta mailing list beta@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/beta
Re: [SlimDevices: Beta] Playlists problem, with SB controller
I have the exact same problem with my Logitech Duet player. I have tried different versions of the Squeezecenter 7.0 and 7.0.1. I have traced the message log within the Duet controller and also tried to debug the server without getting closer to the problem. The server seems to crash with segmentation fault as soon as you start playing your playlist. I'm currently running Squeezecenter on my Openfiler v.2.2 NAS/SAN box, Linux kernel 2.6.19.7 and perl 5.8.7. I have logged this case at Logitech Support but haven't got to many tips on how to proceed with this issue. -- hwoe hwoe's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=17215 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=46160 ___ beta mailing list beta@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/beta
