Re: [Bf-committers] Projection matrix export to Python
> Now - if Projection matrix could be exported python ( and also used in > rendering pipeline, not only preview ), this might be a good feature >... > - just instead of glOrtho or glPerspective to > use glLoadMatrix ( and respective function in render pipeline) >... > Now I do not need a feature, so have less motivation to make a complete a > patch, but still decided to share idea. > Hi Sergey, great idea! thank you for sharing. I was missing this functionality in Blender. It could be very useful for technical renderings (engineering, architecture). I would appreciate if you do this patch. thanks, migius -- GMX DSL Doppel-Flat ab 19,99 Euro/mtl.! Jetzt auch mit gratis Notebook-Flat! http://portal.gmx.net/de/go/dsl ___ Bf-committers mailing list Bf-committers@blender.org http://lists.blender.org/mailman/listinfo/bf-committers
[Bf-committers] Projection matrix export to Python
Hi migius > It could be very useful for technical renderings (engineering, architecture). I need to find where to apply projection in renderer. If I do, I will send patch, otherwise - it is just idea so far Regards Sergey Hi Sergey, > great idea! thank you for sharing. > I was missing this functionality in Blender. It could be very useful for > technical renderings (engineering, architecture). > I would appreciate if you do this patch. > thanks, > migius > -- > ___ Bf-committers mailing list Bf-committers@blender.org http://lists.blender.org/mailman/listinfo/bf-committers
[Bf-committers] python install directory option in cmake
Hi all, I've noticed in recent svn updates, there doesn't seem to be the option to specify where in the filesystem python is installed on a system anymore. Was this intentionally dropped or am I possibly just missing something? This causes issues on FreeBSD because a user adding python3.1 to their system will add it to /usr/local/include/ instead of /usr/include/ I can create link/symlinks to "correct" the problem, but it was far more convenient to specify it whilst in ccmake :) Thanks, Pete ___ Bf-committers mailing list Bf-committers@blender.org http://lists.blender.org/mailman/listinfo/bf-committers
Re: [Bf-committers] Module Owner List
Hey Pete, sure there is no reason why we should not also have official FreeBSD Releases! Thomas Am 28.12.2010 19:09, schrieb pete larabell: > Hi Thomas, > > Just curious as to whether there is enough need (want) for FreeBSD builds > that you'd like someone to do official builds, or shall that just be left to > graphicall.org uploads? > > I built the 2.55 for FreeBSD i386 and amd64 architectures but didn't get a > response yet about 2.56 when I inquired about not seeing FreeBSD on the list > of platform builders being asked if they were ready/able to do 2.56. > > I checked the ModulesOwners to see if FreeBSD was listed on Release OSes and > it wasn't. If there is not enough need for it that's fine, I can just post > to graphicall, but I'm certainly willing and able to build for official > releases too so long as I know in advance that I should be doing it. > > I know the unofficial title of FreeBSD build maintainer was sorta given to > Jaevixa McNomera after she started releasing builds in graphicall some > months ago, and I offered to pick up the task when she was near fatally > injured a couple months ago. I spoke with her about when she'd be back and > able to resume her role in building these, and her current projected time is > summer 2011 at the soonest. > > So basically, if you guys want a FreeBSD guy to do release builds, I'm happy > to do it. :) > > Cheers, > Pete > > On Tue, Dec 28, 2010 at 11:50 AM, Thomas Dinges wrote: > >> Hey everyone, >> for the last few months it was quite unclear, especially for new >> developers and patch-submitters who is responsible for a module. That is >> now finally solved. >> >> Ton has reviewed and approved a list, I have made about 1 year ago. This >> list was in the wiki and most of the current developers already took a >> look at it, so it should be all fine. >> >> Mindrones made a template of it, so this list can be put into other wiki >> pages which is very useful. >> http://wiki.blender.org/index.php/Template:ModulesOwners >> >> It would be cool if everyone could take a look at it again and if there >> is something wrong please answer to this mail here on the list. >> >> You can also checkout the guidelines on how to put this info on wiki pages. >> http://wiki.blender.org/index.php/Template:ModulesOwners#Guidelines >> >> Thomas >> ___ >> Bf-committers mailing list >> Bf-committers@blender.org >> http://lists.blender.org/mailman/listinfo/bf-committers >> > ___ > Bf-committers mailing list > Bf-committers@blender.org > http://lists.blender.org/mailman/listinfo/bf-committers ___ Bf-committers mailing list Bf-committers@blender.org http://lists.blender.org/mailman/listinfo/bf-committers
Re: [Bf-committers] Module Owner List
Yeah! I currently have both i386 and amd64 builds working, so when the word for 2.56 goes out, so long as I know what rev. to compile, I'd be more than happy to provide them. :) :) :) On Wed, Dec 29, 2010 at 12:17 PM, Thomas Dinges wrote: > Hey Pete, > sure there is no reason why we should not also have official FreeBSD > Releases! > > Thomas > > Am 28.12.2010 19:09, schrieb pete larabell: > > Hi Thomas, > > > > Just curious as to whether there is enough need (want) for FreeBSD builds > > that you'd like someone to do official builds, or shall that just be left > to > > graphicall.org uploads? > > > > I built the 2.55 for FreeBSD i386 and amd64 architectures but didn't get > a > > response yet about 2.56 when I inquired about not seeing FreeBSD on the > list > > of platform builders being asked if they were ready/able to do 2.56. > > > > I checked the ModulesOwners to see if FreeBSD was listed on Release OSes > and > > it wasn't. If there is not enough need for it that's fine, I can just > post > > to graphicall, but I'm certainly willing and able to build for official > > releases too so long as I know in advance that I should be doing it. > > > > I know the unofficial title of FreeBSD build maintainer was sorta given > to > > Jaevixa McNomera after she started releasing builds in graphicall some > > months ago, and I offered to pick up the task when she was near fatally > > injured a couple months ago. I spoke with her about when she'd be back > and > > able to resume her role in building these, and her current projected time > is > > summer 2011 at the soonest. > > > > So basically, if you guys want a FreeBSD guy to do release builds, I'm > happy > > to do it. :) > > > > Cheers, > > Pete > > > > On Tue, Dec 28, 2010 at 11:50 AM, Thomas Dinges > wrote: > > > >> Hey everyone, > >> for the last few months it was quite unclear, especially for new > >> developers and patch-submitters who is responsible for a module. That is > >> now finally solved. > >> > >> Ton has reviewed and approved a list, I have made about 1 year ago. This > >> list was in the wiki and most of the current developers already took a > >> look at it, so it should be all fine. > >> > >> Mindrones made a template of it, so this list can be put into other wiki > >> pages which is very useful. > >> http://wiki.blender.org/index.php/Template:ModulesOwners > >> > >> It would be cool if everyone could take a look at it again and if there > >> is something wrong please answer to this mail here on the list. > >> > >> You can also checkout the guidelines on how to put this info on wiki > pages. > >> http://wiki.blender.org/index.php/Template:ModulesOwners#Guidelines > >> > >> Thomas > >> ___ > >> Bf-committers mailing list > >> Bf-committers@blender.org > >> http://lists.blender.org/mailman/listinfo/bf-committers > >> > > ___ > > Bf-committers mailing list > > Bf-committers@blender.org > > http://lists.blender.org/mailman/listinfo/bf-committers > ___ > Bf-committers mailing list > Bf-committers@blender.org > http://lists.blender.org/mailman/listinfo/bf-committers > ___ Bf-committers mailing list Bf-committers@blender.org http://lists.blender.org/mailman/listinfo/bf-committers
Re: [Bf-committers] Module Owner List
Hey Thomas, Sorry to bother you with silly questions, but do I add myself to the ModuleOwners list on the wiki page, or does an official from BF do that? Cheers, Pete On Wed, Dec 29, 2010 at 12:23 PM, pete larabell wrote: > Yeah! > > I currently have both i386 and amd64 builds working, so when the word for > 2.56 goes out, so long as I know what rev. to compile, I'd be more than > happy to provide them. > > :) :) :) > > > On Wed, Dec 29, 2010 at 12:17 PM, Thomas Dinges wrote: > >> Hey Pete, >> sure there is no reason why we should not also have official FreeBSD >> Releases! >> >> Thomas >> >> Am 28.12.2010 19:09, schrieb pete larabell: >> > Hi Thomas, >> > >> > Just curious as to whether there is enough need (want) for FreeBSD >> builds >> > that you'd like someone to do official builds, or shall that just be >> left to >> > graphicall.org uploads? >> > >> > I built the 2.55 for FreeBSD i386 and amd64 architectures but didn't get >> a >> > response yet about 2.56 when I inquired about not seeing FreeBSD on the >> list >> > of platform builders being asked if they were ready/able to do 2.56. >> > >> > I checked the ModulesOwners to see if FreeBSD was listed on Release OSes >> and >> > it wasn't. If there is not enough need for it that's fine, I can just >> post >> > to graphicall, but I'm certainly willing and able to build for official >> > releases too so long as I know in advance that I should be doing it. >> > >> > I know the unofficial title of FreeBSD build maintainer was sorta given >> to >> > Jaevixa McNomera after she started releasing builds in graphicall some >> > months ago, and I offered to pick up the task when she was near fatally >> > injured a couple months ago. I spoke with her about when she'd be back >> and >> > able to resume her role in building these, and her current projected >> time is >> > summer 2011 at the soonest. >> > >> > So basically, if you guys want a FreeBSD guy to do release builds, I'm >> happy >> > to do it. :) >> > >> > Cheers, >> > Pete >> > >> > On Tue, Dec 28, 2010 at 11:50 AM, Thomas Dinges >> wrote: >> > >> >> Hey everyone, >> >> for the last few months it was quite unclear, especially for new >> >> developers and patch-submitters who is responsible for a module. That >> is >> >> now finally solved. >> >> >> >> Ton has reviewed and approved a list, I have made about 1 year ago. >> This >> >> list was in the wiki and most of the current developers already took a >> >> look at it, so it should be all fine. >> >> >> >> Mindrones made a template of it, so this list can be put into other >> wiki >> >> pages which is very useful. >> >> http://wiki.blender.org/index.php/Template:ModulesOwners >> >> >> >> It would be cool if everyone could take a look at it again and if there >> >> is something wrong please answer to this mail here on the list. >> >> >> >> You can also checkout the guidelines on how to put this info on wiki >> pages. >> >> http://wiki.blender.org/index.php/Template:ModulesOwners#Guidelines >> >> >> >> Thomas >> >> ___ >> >> Bf-committers mailing list >> >> Bf-committers@blender.org >> >> http://lists.blender.org/mailman/listinfo/bf-committers >> >> >> > ___ >> > Bf-committers mailing list >> > Bf-committers@blender.org >> > http://lists.blender.org/mailman/listinfo/bf-committers >> ___ >> Bf-committers mailing list >> Bf-committers@blender.org >> http://lists.blender.org/mailman/listinfo/bf-committers >> > > ___ Bf-committers mailing list Bf-committers@blender.org http://lists.blender.org/mailman/listinfo/bf-committers
[Bf-committers] 2.56-beta release AHOY!
Hi all, Let's freeze svn for a day to prevent confusing situations, and have release builders work on what they need to get a good binary! Only do commits related to making the builds please. SVN needs to be tagged still; but last commit from me was 33942. Tag will be announced here too. Send out binaries via the usual channels, or ask me for where to put them! Note: cmake for my Mac failed to make a 2.56 directory in the app bundle... needs to be checked on. Thanks! -Ton- Ton Roosendaal Blender Foundation t...@blender.orgwww.blender.org Blender Institute Entrepotdok 57A 1018AD Amsterdam The Netherlands ___ Bf-committers mailing list Bf-committers@blender.org http://lists.blender.org/mailman/listinfo/bf-committers
Re: [Bf-committers] Module Owner List
Hi Pete, Some kind of "official" approval for this owner list is preferred yes. For FreeBSD you can add yourself, go ahead! Thanks a lot, -Ton- Ton Roosendaal Blender Foundation t...@blender.orgwww.blender.org Blender Institute Entrepotdok 57A 1018AD Amsterdam The Netherlands On 29 Dec, 2010, at 19:41, pete larabell wrote: > Hey Thomas, > > Sorry to bother you with silly questions, but do I add myself to the > ModuleOwners list on the wiki page, or does an official from BF do > that? > > Cheers, > Pete > > > On Wed, Dec 29, 2010 at 12:23 PM, pete larabell > wrote: > >> Yeah! >> >> I currently have both i386 and amd64 builds working, so when the >> word for >> 2.56 goes out, so long as I know what rev. to compile, I'd be more >> than >> happy to provide them. >> >> :) :) :) >> >> >> On Wed, Dec 29, 2010 at 12:17 PM, Thomas Dinges >> wrote: >> >>> Hey Pete, >>> sure there is no reason why we should not also have official FreeBSD >>> Releases! >>> >>> Thomas >>> >>> Am 28.12.2010 19:09, schrieb pete larabell: Hi Thomas, Just curious as to whether there is enough need (want) for FreeBSD >>> builds that you'd like someone to do official builds, or shall that just be >>> left to graphicall.org uploads? I built the 2.55 for FreeBSD i386 and amd64 architectures but didn't get >>> a response yet about 2.56 when I inquired about not seeing FreeBSD on the >>> list of platform builders being asked if they were ready/able to do 2.56. I checked the ModulesOwners to see if FreeBSD was listed on Release OSes >>> and it wasn't. If there is not enough need for it that's fine, I can just >>> post to graphicall, but I'm certainly willing and able to build for official releases too so long as I know in advance that I should be doing it. I know the unofficial title of FreeBSD build maintainer was sorta given >>> to Jaevixa McNomera after she started releasing builds in graphicall some months ago, and I offered to pick up the task when she was near fatally injured a couple months ago. I spoke with her about when she'd be back >>> and able to resume her role in building these, and her current projected >>> time is summer 2011 at the soonest. So basically, if you guys want a FreeBSD guy to do release builds, I'm >>> happy to do it. :) Cheers, Pete On Tue, Dec 28, 2010 at 11:50 AM, Thomas Dinges >>> wrote: > Hey everyone, > for the last few months it was quite unclear, especially for new > developers and patch-submitters who is responsible for a module. > That >>> is > now finally solved. > > Ton has reviewed and approved a list, I have made about 1 year > ago. >>> This > list was in the wiki and most of the current developers already > took a > look at it, so it should be all fine. > > Mindrones made a template of it, so this list can be put into > other >>> wiki > pages which is very useful. > http://wiki.blender.org/index.php/Template:ModulesOwners > > It would be cool if everyone could take a look at it again and > if there > is something wrong please answer to this mail here on the list. > > You can also checkout the guidelines on how to put this info on > wiki >>> pages. > http://wiki.blender.org/index.php/ > Template:ModulesOwners#Guidelines > > Thomas > ___ > Bf-committers mailing list > Bf-committers@blender.org > http://lists.blender.org/mailman/listinfo/bf-committers > ___ Bf-committers mailing list Bf-committers@blender.org http://lists.blender.org/mailman/listinfo/bf-committers >>> ___ >>> Bf-committers mailing list >>> Bf-committers@blender.org >>> http://lists.blender.org/mailman/listinfo/bf-committers >>> >> >> > ___ > Bf-committers mailing list > Bf-committers@blender.org > http://lists.blender.org/mailman/listinfo/bf-committers ___ Bf-committers mailing list Bf-committers@blender.org http://lists.blender.org/mailman/listinfo/bf-committers
Re: [Bf-committers] 2.56-beta release AHOY!
Ton, I built r33942 on FreeBSD 8.1 amd64 and it using cmake and it does create 2.56 directory. what if BF's preferred method to package the files for upload? (last time I simply tar -cjf the contents of build-cmake/bin/ and uploaded .tbz, is that ok?) Thanks, Pete On Wed, Dec 29, 2010 at 1:10 PM, Ton Roosendaal wrote: > Hi all, > > Let's freeze svn for a day to prevent confusing situations, and have > release builders work on what they need to get a good binary! Only do > commits related to making the builds please. > > SVN needs to be tagged still; but last commit from me was 33942. Tag > will be announced here too. > > Send out binaries via the usual channels, or ask me for where to put > them! > > Note: cmake for my Mac failed to make a 2.56 directory in the app > bundle... needs to be checked on. > > Thanks! > > -Ton- > > > Ton Roosendaal Blender Foundation t...@blender.orgwww.blender.org > Blender Institute Entrepotdok 57A 1018AD Amsterdam The Netherlands > > ___ > Bf-committers mailing list > Bf-committers@blender.org > http://lists.blender.org/mailman/listinfo/bf-committers > ___ Bf-committers mailing list Bf-committers@blender.org http://lists.blender.org/mailman/listinfo/bf-committers
Re: [Bf-committers] 2.56-beta release AHOY!
Hi, Compression format you can choose freely, based on what FreeBSD users prefer. Make sure the binary is stripped, and make a release file name similar to the others; blender-2.56-beta-xxx.xxx We also put in the distro the text files from release/text/ -Ton- Ton Roosendaal Blender Foundation t...@blender.orgwww.blender.org Blender Institute Entrepotdok 57A 1018AD Amsterdam The Netherlands On 29 Dec, 2010, at 20:16, pete larabell wrote: > Ton, > > I built r33942 on FreeBSD 8.1 amd64 and it using cmake and it does > create > 2.56 directory. what if BF's preferred method to package the files for > upload? (last time I simply tar -cjf the contents of build-cmake/ > bin/ and > uploaded .tbz, is that ok?) > > Thanks, > Pete > > On Wed, Dec 29, 2010 at 1:10 PM, Ton Roosendaal > wrote: > >> Hi all, >> >> Let's freeze svn for a day to prevent confusing situations, and have >> release builders work on what they need to get a good binary! Only do >> commits related to making the builds please. >> >> SVN needs to be tagged still; but last commit from me was 33942. Tag >> will be announced here too. >> >> Send out binaries via the usual channels, or ask me for where to put >> them! >> >> Note: cmake for my Mac failed to make a 2.56 directory in the app >> bundle... needs to be checked on. >> >> Thanks! >> >> -Ton- >> >> >> Ton Roosendaal Blender Foundation t...@blender.orgwww.blender.org >> Blender Institute Entrepotdok 57A 1018AD Amsterdam The >> Netherlands >> >> ___ >> Bf-committers mailing list >> Bf-committers@blender.org >> http://lists.blender.org/mailman/listinfo/bf-committers >> > ___ > Bf-committers mailing list > Bf-committers@blender.org > http://lists.blender.org/mailman/listinfo/bf-committers ___ Bf-committers mailing list Bf-committers@blender.org http://lists.blender.org/mailman/listinfo/bf-committers
Re: [Bf-committers] 2.56-beta release AHOY!
Sorry to bother again, what exactly do you mean by "make sure binary is stripped?" On Wed, Dec 29, 2010 at 1:26 PM, Ton Roosendaal wrote: > Hi, > > Compression format you can choose freely, based on what FreeBSD users > prefer. > Make sure the binary is stripped, and make a release file name similar > to the others; > > blender-2.56-beta-xxx.xxx > > We also put in the distro the text files from release/text/ > > -Ton- > > > Ton Roosendaal Blender Foundation t...@blender.orgwww.blender.org > Blender Institute Entrepotdok 57A 1018AD Amsterdam The Netherlands > > On 29 Dec, 2010, at 20:16, pete larabell wrote: > > > Ton, > > > > I built r33942 on FreeBSD 8.1 amd64 and it using cmake and it does > > create > > 2.56 directory. what if BF's preferred method to package the files for > > upload? (last time I simply tar -cjf the contents of build-cmake/ > > bin/ and > > uploaded .tbz, is that ok?) > > > > Thanks, > > Pete > > > > On Wed, Dec 29, 2010 at 1:10 PM, Ton Roosendaal > > wrote: > > > >> Hi all, > >> > >> Let's freeze svn for a day to prevent confusing situations, and have > >> release builders work on what they need to get a good binary! Only do > >> commits related to making the builds please. > >> > >> SVN needs to be tagged still; but last commit from me was 33942. Tag > >> will be announced here too. > >> > >> Send out binaries via the usual channels, or ask me for where to put > >> them! > >> > >> Note: cmake for my Mac failed to make a 2.56 directory in the app > >> bundle... needs to be checked on. > >> > >> Thanks! > >> > >> -Ton- > >> > >> > >> Ton Roosendaal Blender Foundation t...@blender.orgwww.blender.org > >> Blender Institute Entrepotdok 57A 1018AD Amsterdam The > >> Netherlands > >> > >> ___ > >> Bf-committers mailing list > >> Bf-committers@blender.org > >> http://lists.blender.org/mailman/listinfo/bf-committers > >> > > ___ > > Bf-committers mailing list > > Bf-committers@blender.org > > http://lists.blender.org/mailman/listinfo/bf-committers > > ___ > Bf-committers mailing list > Bf-committers@blender.org > http://lists.blender.org/mailman/listinfo/bf-committers > ___ Bf-committers mailing list Bf-committers@blender.org http://lists.blender.org/mailman/listinfo/bf-committers
Re: [Bf-committers] 2.56-beta release AHOY!
Hi Ton, Using cmake on 33942 and building with xcode gave me the 2.56 directory in the app bundle fine. And the 2.56 directory is also created at runtime in the Application Support/Blender folder. Maybe it is an issue with cmake/makefiles ? Damien Le 29 déc. 2010 à 20:10, Ton Roosendaal a écrit : > Hi all, > > Let's freeze svn for a day to prevent confusing situations, and have > release builders work on what they need to get a good binary! Only do > commits related to making the builds please. > > SVN needs to be tagged still; but last commit from me was 33942. Tag > will be announced here too. > > Send out binaries via the usual channels, or ask me for where to put > them! > > Note: cmake for my Mac failed to make a 2.56 directory in the app > bundle... needs to be checked on. > > Thanks! > > -Ton- > > > Ton Roosendaal Blender Foundation t...@blender.orgwww.blender.org > Blender Institute Entrepotdok 57A 1018AD Amsterdam The Netherlands > > ___ > Bf-committers mailing list > Bf-committers@blender.org > http://lists.blender.org/mailman/listinfo/bf-committers ___ Bf-committers mailing list Bf-committers@blender.org http://lists.blender.org/mailman/listinfo/bf-committers
Re: [Bf-committers] 2.56-beta release AHOY!
Hey guys, I uploaded a build called blender-2.56-beta-FreeBSD-amd64.tbz to download.blender.org/incoming but forgot to build it with RELEASE optimized compiler flags. I just rebuilt with appropriate flags, but now can't overwrite the "bad" file I uploaded first. Is there a way I can overwrite that with the new one??? Thanks, and sorry for the error. Pete On Wed, Dec 29, 2010 at 1:40 PM, Damien Plisson wrote: > Hi Ton, > > Using cmake on 33942 and building with xcode gave me the 2.56 directory in > the app bundle fine. > And the 2.56 directory is also created at runtime in the Application > Support/Blender folder. > > Maybe it is an issue with cmake/makefiles ? > > Damien > > Le 29 déc. 2010 à 20:10, Ton Roosendaal a écrit : > > > Hi all, > > > > Let's freeze svn for a day to prevent confusing situations, and have > > release builders work on what they need to get a good binary! Only do > > commits related to making the builds please. > > > > SVN needs to be tagged still; but last commit from me was 33942. Tag > > will be announced here too. > > > > Send out binaries via the usual channels, or ask me for where to put > > them! > > > > Note: cmake for my Mac failed to make a 2.56 directory in the app > > bundle... needs to be checked on. > > > > Thanks! > > > > -Ton- > > > > > > Ton Roosendaal Blender Foundation t...@blender.orgwww.blender.org > > Blender Institute Entrepotdok 57A 1018AD Amsterdam The Netherlands > > > > ___ > > Bf-committers mailing list > > Bf-committers@blender.org > > http://lists.blender.org/mailman/listinfo/bf-committers > > ___ > Bf-committers mailing list > Bf-committers@blender.org > http://lists.blender.org/mailman/listinfo/bf-committers > ___ Bf-committers mailing list Bf-committers@blender.org http://lists.blender.org/mailman/listinfo/bf-committers
Re: [Bf-committers] 2.56-beta release AHOY!
You have to wait until someone with acces deletes the old file. No problem! Don't you worry! :) cheers, Thomas Am 29.12.2010 21:34, schrieb pete larabell: > Hey guys, > > I uploaded a build called blender-2.56-beta-FreeBSD-amd64.tbz to > download.blender.org/incoming but forgot to build it with RELEASE optimized > compiler flags. I just rebuilt with appropriate flags, but now can't > overwrite the "bad" file I uploaded first. Is there a way I can overwrite > that with the new one??? > > Thanks, and sorry for the error. > Pete > > On Wed, Dec 29, 2010 at 1:40 PM, Damien Plissonwrote: > >> Hi Ton, >> >> Using cmake on 33942 and building with xcode gave me the 2.56 directory in >> the app bundle fine. >> And the 2.56 directory is also created at runtime in the Application >> Support/Blender folder. >> >> Maybe it is an issue with cmake/makefiles ? >> >> Damien >> >> Le 29 déc. 2010 à 20:10, Ton Roosendaal a écrit : >> >>> Hi all, >>> >>> Let's freeze svn for a day to prevent confusing situations, and have >>> release builders work on what they need to get a good binary! Only do >>> commits related to making the builds please. >>> >>> SVN needs to be tagged still; but last commit from me was 33942. Tag >>> will be announced here too. >>> >>> Send out binaries via the usual channels, or ask me for where to put >>> them! >>> >>> Note: cmake for my Mac failed to make a 2.56 directory in the app >>> bundle... needs to be checked on. >>> >>> Thanks! >>> >>> -Ton- >>> >>> >>> Ton Roosendaal Blender Foundation t...@blender.orgwww.blender.org >>> Blender Institute Entrepotdok 57A 1018AD Amsterdam The Netherlands >>> >>> ___ >>> Bf-committers mailing list >>> Bf-committers@blender.org >>> http://lists.blender.org/mailman/listinfo/bf-committers >> ___ >> Bf-committers mailing list >> Bf-committers@blender.org >> http://lists.blender.org/mailman/listinfo/bf-committers >> > ___ > Bf-committers mailing list > Bf-committers@blender.org > http://lists.blender.org/mailman/listinfo/bf-committers ___ Bf-committers mailing list Bf-committers@blender.org http://lists.blender.org/mailman/listinfo/bf-committers
Re: [Bf-committers] 2.56-beta release AHOY!
So, do I need to send an email somewhere asking someone to do that, or was me indicating the error, and you responding to it, enough that someone will do it?? On Wed, Dec 29, 2010 at 3:05 PM, Thomas Dinges wrote: > You have to wait until someone with acces deletes the old file. > > No problem! Don't you worry! :) > > cheers, > Thomas > > Am 29.12.2010 21:34, schrieb pete larabell: > > Hey guys, > > > > I uploaded a build called blender-2.56-beta-FreeBSD-amd64.tbz to > > download.blender.org/incoming but forgot to build it with RELEASE > optimized > > compiler flags. I just rebuilt with appropriate flags, but now can't > > overwrite the "bad" file I uploaded first. Is there a way I can overwrite > > that with the new one??? > > > > Thanks, and sorry for the error. > > Pete > > > > On Wed, Dec 29, 2010 at 1:40 PM, Damien Plisson >wrote: > > > >> Hi Ton, > >> > >> Using cmake on 33942 and building with xcode gave me the 2.56 directory > in > >> the app bundle fine. > >> And the 2.56 directory is also created at runtime in the Application > >> Support/Blender folder. > >> > >> Maybe it is an issue with cmake/makefiles ? > >> > >> Damien > >> > >> Le 29 déc. 2010 à 20:10, Ton Roosendaal a écrit : > >> > >>> Hi all, > >>> > >>> Let's freeze svn for a day to prevent confusing situations, and have > >>> release builders work on what they need to get a good binary! Only do > >>> commits related to making the builds please. > >>> > >>> SVN needs to be tagged still; but last commit from me was 33942. Tag > >>> will be announced here too. > >>> > >>> Send out binaries via the usual channels, or ask me for where to put > >>> them! > >>> > >>> Note: cmake for my Mac failed to make a 2.56 directory in the app > >>> bundle... needs to be checked on. > >>> > >>> Thanks! > >>> > >>> -Ton- > >>> > >>> > > >>> Ton Roosendaal Blender Foundation t...@blender.org > www.blender.org > >>> Blender Institute Entrepotdok 57A 1018AD Amsterdam The Netherlands > >>> > >>> ___ > >>> Bf-committers mailing list > >>> Bf-committers@blender.org > >>> http://lists.blender.org/mailman/listinfo/bf-committers > >> ___ > >> Bf-committers mailing list > >> Bf-committers@blender.org > >> http://lists.blender.org/mailman/listinfo/bf-committers > >> > > ___ > > Bf-committers mailing list > > Bf-committers@blender.org > > http://lists.blender.org/mailman/listinfo/bf-committers > > ___ > Bf-committers mailing list > Bf-committers@blender.org > http://lists.blender.org/mailman/listinfo/bf-committers > ___ Bf-committers mailing list Bf-committers@blender.org http://lists.blender.org/mailman/listinfo/bf-committers
Re: [Bf-committers] 2.56-beta release AHOY!
Just be patient, someone with acces will read this and delete the old file. :) Thomas Am 29.12.2010 23:33, schrieb pete larabell: > So, do I need to send an email somewhere asking someone to do that, or was > me indicating the error, and you responding to it, enough that someone will > do it?? > > On Wed, Dec 29, 2010 at 3:05 PM, Thomas Dinges wrote: > >> You have to wait until someone with acces deletes the old file. >> >> No problem! Don't you worry! :) >> >> cheers, >> Thomas >> >> Am 29.12.2010 21:34, schrieb pete larabell: >>> Hey guys, >>> >>> I uploaded a build called blender-2.56-beta-FreeBSD-amd64.tbz to >>> download.blender.org/incoming but forgot to build it with RELEASE >> optimized >>> compiler flags. I just rebuilt with appropriate flags, but now can't >>> overwrite the "bad" file I uploaded first. Is there a way I can overwrite >>> that with the new one??? >>> >>> Thanks, and sorry for the error. >>> Pete >>> >>> On Wed, Dec 29, 2010 at 1:40 PM, Damien Plisson>> wrote: >>> Hi Ton, Using cmake on 33942 and building with xcode gave me the 2.56 directory >> in the app bundle fine. And the 2.56 directory is also created at runtime in the Application Support/Blender folder. Maybe it is an issue with cmake/makefiles ? Damien Le 29 déc. 2010 à 20:10, Ton Roosendaal a écrit : > Hi all, > > Let's freeze svn for a day to prevent confusing situations, and have > release builders work on what they need to get a good binary! Only do > commits related to making the builds please. > > SVN needs to be tagged still; but last commit from me was 33942. Tag > will be announced here too. > > Send out binaries via the usual channels, or ask me for where to put > them! > > Note: cmake for my Mac failed to make a 2.56 directory in the app > bundle... needs to be checked on. > > Thanks! > > -Ton- > > >> > Ton Roosendaal Blender Foundation t...@blender.org >> www.blender.org > Blender Institute Entrepotdok 57A 1018AD Amsterdam The Netherlands > > ___ > Bf-committers mailing list > Bf-committers@blender.org > http://lists.blender.org/mailman/listinfo/bf-committers ___ Bf-committers mailing list Bf-committers@blender.org http://lists.blender.org/mailman/listinfo/bf-committers >>> ___ >>> Bf-committers mailing list >>> Bf-committers@blender.org >>> http://lists.blender.org/mailman/listinfo/bf-committers >> ___ >> Bf-committers mailing list >> Bf-committers@blender.org >> http://lists.blender.org/mailman/listinfo/bf-committers >> > ___ > Bf-committers mailing list > Bf-committers@blender.org > http://lists.blender.org/mailman/listinfo/bf-committers ___ Bf-committers mailing list Bf-committers@blender.org http://lists.blender.org/mailman/listinfo/bf-committers
Re: [Bf-committers] 2.56-beta release AHOY!
awesome! Thanks so much Thomas! On Wed, Dec 29, 2010 at 4:44 PM, Thomas Dinges wrote: > Just be patient, someone with acces will read this and delete the old > file. :) > > Thomas > > Am 29.12.2010 23:33, schrieb pete larabell: > > So, do I need to send an email somewhere asking someone to do that, or > was > > me indicating the error, and you responding to it, enough that someone > will > > do it?? > > > > On Wed, Dec 29, 2010 at 3:05 PM, Thomas Dinges > wrote: > > > >> You have to wait until someone with acces deletes the old file. > >> > >> No problem! Don't you worry! :) > >> > >> cheers, > >> Thomas > >> > >> Am 29.12.2010 21:34, schrieb pete larabell: > >>> Hey guys, > >>> > >>> I uploaded a build called blender-2.56-beta-FreeBSD-amd64.tbz to > >>> download.blender.org/incoming but forgot to build it with RELEASE > >> optimized > >>> compiler flags. I just rebuilt with appropriate flags, but now can't > >>> overwrite the "bad" file I uploaded first. Is there a way I can > overwrite > >>> that with the new one??? > >>> > >>> Thanks, and sorry for the error. > >>> Pete > >>> > >>> On Wed, Dec 29, 2010 at 1:40 PM, Damien Plisson< > damien.plis...@yahoo.fr > >>> wrote: > >>> > Hi Ton, > > Using cmake on 33942 and building with xcode gave me the 2.56 > directory > >> in > the app bundle fine. > And the 2.56 directory is also created at runtime in the Application > Support/Blender folder. > > Maybe it is an issue with cmake/makefiles ? > > Damien > > Le 29 déc. 2010 à 20:10, Ton Roosendaal a écrit : > > > Hi all, > > > > Let's freeze svn for a day to prevent confusing situations, and have > > release builders work on what they need to get a good binary! Only do > > commits related to making the builds please. > > > > SVN needs to be tagged still; but last commit from me was 33942. Tag > > will be announced here too. > > > > Send out binaries via the usual channels, or ask me for where to put > > them! > > > > Note: cmake for my Mac failed to make a 2.56 directory in the app > > bundle... needs to be checked on. > > > > Thanks! > > > > -Ton- > > > > > >> > > Ton Roosendaal Blender Foundation t...@blender.org > >> www.blender.org > > Blender Institute Entrepotdok 57A 1018AD Amsterdam The > Netherlands > > > > ___ > > Bf-committers mailing list > > Bf-committers@blender.org > > http://lists.blender.org/mailman/listinfo/bf-committers > ___ > Bf-committers mailing list > Bf-committers@blender.org > http://lists.blender.org/mailman/listinfo/bf-committers > > >>> ___ > >>> Bf-committers mailing list > >>> Bf-committers@blender.org > >>> http://lists.blender.org/mailman/listinfo/bf-committers > >> ___ > >> Bf-committers mailing list > >> Bf-committers@blender.org > >> http://lists.blender.org/mailman/listinfo/bf-committers > >> > > ___ > > Bf-committers mailing list > > Bf-committers@blender.org > > http://lists.blender.org/mailman/listinfo/bf-committers > > ___ > Bf-committers mailing list > Bf-committers@blender.org > http://lists.blender.org/mailman/listinfo/bf-committers > ___ Bf-committers mailing list Bf-committers@blender.org http://lists.blender.org/mailman/listinfo/bf-committers
Re: [Bf-committers] 2.56-beta release AHOY!
Hi, The bad one is: blender-2.56-beta-FreeBSD-amd64.tbz ? - Diego On Wed, Dec 29, 2010 at 7:47 PM, pete larabell wrote: > awesome! Thanks so much Thomas! > > On Wed, Dec 29, 2010 at 4:44 PM, Thomas Dinges wrote: > >> Just be patient, someone with acces will read this and delete the old >> file. :) >> >> Thomas >> >> Am 29.12.2010 23:33, schrieb pete larabell: >> > So, do I need to send an email somewhere asking someone to do that, or >> was >> > me indicating the error, and you responding to it, enough that someone >> will >> > do it?? >> > >> > On Wed, Dec 29, 2010 at 3:05 PM, Thomas Dinges >> wrote: >> > >> >> You have to wait until someone with acces deletes the old file. >> >> >> >> No problem! Don't you worry! :) >> >> >> >> cheers, >> >> Thomas >> >> >> >> Am 29.12.2010 21:34, schrieb pete larabell: >> >>> Hey guys, >> >>> >> >>> I uploaded a build called blender-2.56-beta-FreeBSD-amd64.tbz to >> >>> download.blender.org/incoming but forgot to build it with RELEASE >> >> optimized >> >>> compiler flags. I just rebuilt with appropriate flags, but now can't >> >>> overwrite the "bad" file I uploaded first. Is there a way I can >> overwrite >> >>> that with the new one??? >> >>> >> >>> Thanks, and sorry for the error. >> >>> Pete >> >>> >> >>> On Wed, Dec 29, 2010 at 1:40 PM, Damien Plisson< >> damien.plis...@yahoo.fr >> >>> wrote: >> >>> >> Hi Ton, >> >> Using cmake on 33942 and building with xcode gave me the 2.56 >> directory >> >> in >> the app bundle fine. >> And the 2.56 directory is also created at runtime in the Application >> Support/Blender folder. >> >> Maybe it is an issue with cmake/makefiles ? >> >> Damien >> >> Le 29 déc. 2010 à 20:10, Ton Roosendaal a écrit : >> >> > Hi all, >> > >> > Let's freeze svn for a day to prevent confusing situations, and have >> > release builders work on what they need to get a good binary! Only do >> > commits related to making the builds please. >> > >> > SVN needs to be tagged still; but last commit from me was 33942. Tag >> > will be announced here too. >> > >> > Send out binaries via the usual channels, or ask me for where to put >> > them! >> > >> > Note: cmake for my Mac failed to make a 2.56 directory in the app >> > bundle... needs to be checked on. >> > >> > Thanks! >> > >> > -Ton- >> > >> > >> >> >> > Ton Roosendaal Blender Foundation t...@blender.org >> >> www.blender.org >> > Blender Institute Entrepotdok 57A 1018AD Amsterdam The >> Netherlands >> > >> > ___ >> > Bf-committers mailing list >> > Bf-committers@blender.org >> > http://lists.blender.org/mailman/listinfo/bf-committers >> ___ >> Bf-committers mailing list >> Bf-committers@blender.org >> http://lists.blender.org/mailman/listinfo/bf-committers >> >> >>> ___ >> >>> Bf-committers mailing list >> >>> Bf-committers@blender.org >> >>> http://lists.blender.org/mailman/listinfo/bf-committers >> >> ___ >> >> Bf-committers mailing list >> >> Bf-committers@blender.org >> >> http://lists.blender.org/mailman/listinfo/bf-committers >> >> >> > ___ >> > Bf-committers mailing list >> > Bf-committers@blender.org >> > http://lists.blender.org/mailman/listinfo/bf-committers >> >> ___ >> Bf-committers mailing list >> Bf-committers@blender.org >> http://lists.blender.org/mailman/listinfo/bf-committers >> > ___ > Bf-committers mailing list > Bf-committers@blender.org > http://lists.blender.org/mailman/listinfo/bf-committers > ___ Bf-committers mailing list Bf-committers@blender.org http://lists.blender.org/mailman/listinfo/bf-committers
Re: [Bf-committers] 2.56-beta release AHOY!
Hi, I move the file to my home directory, so you can upload the new one. - Diego On Wed, Dec 29, 2010 at 7:58 PM, Diego B wrote: > Hi, > > The bad one is: > > blender-2.56-beta-FreeBSD-amd64.tbz ? > > - > > Diego > > On Wed, Dec 29, 2010 at 7:47 PM, pete larabell wrote: >> awesome! Thanks so much Thomas! >> >> On Wed, Dec 29, 2010 at 4:44 PM, Thomas Dinges wrote: >> >>> Just be patient, someone with acces will read this and delete the old >>> file. :) >>> >>> Thomas >>> >>> Am 29.12.2010 23:33, schrieb pete larabell: >>> > So, do I need to send an email somewhere asking someone to do that, or >>> was >>> > me indicating the error, and you responding to it, enough that someone >>> will >>> > do it?? >>> > >>> > On Wed, Dec 29, 2010 at 3:05 PM, Thomas Dinges >>> wrote: >>> > >>> >> You have to wait until someone with acces deletes the old file. >>> >> >>> >> No problem! Don't you worry! :) >>> >> >>> >> cheers, >>> >> Thomas >>> >> >>> >> Am 29.12.2010 21:34, schrieb pete larabell: >>> >>> Hey guys, >>> >>> >>> >>> I uploaded a build called blender-2.56-beta-FreeBSD-amd64.tbz to >>> >>> download.blender.org/incoming but forgot to build it with RELEASE >>> >> optimized >>> >>> compiler flags. I just rebuilt with appropriate flags, but now can't >>> >>> overwrite the "bad" file I uploaded first. Is there a way I can >>> overwrite >>> >>> that with the new one??? >>> >>> >>> >>> Thanks, and sorry for the error. >>> >>> Pete >>> >>> >>> >>> On Wed, Dec 29, 2010 at 1:40 PM, Damien Plisson< >>> damien.plis...@yahoo.fr >>> >>> wrote: >>> >>> >>> Hi Ton, >>> >>> Using cmake on 33942 and building with xcode gave me the 2.56 >>> directory >>> >> in >>> the app bundle fine. >>> And the 2.56 directory is also created at runtime in the Application >>> Support/Blender folder. >>> >>> Maybe it is an issue with cmake/makefiles ? >>> >>> Damien >>> >>> Le 29 déc. 2010 à 20:10, Ton Roosendaal a écrit : >>> >>> > Hi all, >>> > >>> > Let's freeze svn for a day to prevent confusing situations, and have >>> > release builders work on what they need to get a good binary! Only do >>> > commits related to making the builds please. >>> > >>> > SVN needs to be tagged still; but last commit from me was 33942. Tag >>> > will be announced here too. >>> > >>> > Send out binaries via the usual channels, or ask me for where to put >>> > them! >>> > >>> > Note: cmake for my Mac failed to make a 2.56 directory in the app >>> > bundle... needs to be checked on. >>> > >>> > Thanks! >>> > >>> > -Ton- >>> > >>> > >>> >> >>> > Ton Roosendaal Blender Foundation t...@blender.org >>> >> www.blender.org >>> > Blender Institute Entrepotdok 57A 1018AD Amsterdam The >>> Netherlands >>> > >>> > ___ >>> > Bf-committers mailing list >>> > Bf-committers@blender.org >>> > http://lists.blender.org/mailman/listinfo/bf-committers >>> ___ >>> Bf-committers mailing list >>> Bf-committers@blender.org >>> http://lists.blender.org/mailman/listinfo/bf-committers >>> >>> >>> ___ >>> >>> Bf-committers mailing list >>> >>> Bf-committers@blender.org >>> >>> http://lists.blender.org/mailman/listinfo/bf-committers >>> >> ___ >>> >> Bf-committers mailing list >>> >> Bf-committers@blender.org >>> >> http://lists.blender.org/mailman/listinfo/bf-committers >>> >> >>> > ___ >>> > Bf-committers mailing list >>> > Bf-committers@blender.org >>> > http://lists.blender.org/mailman/listinfo/bf-committers >>> >>> ___ >>> Bf-committers mailing list >>> Bf-committers@blender.org >>> http://lists.blender.org/mailman/listinfo/bf-committers >>> >> ___ >> Bf-committers mailing list >> Bf-committers@blender.org >> http://lists.blender.org/mailman/listinfo/bf-committers >> > ___ Bf-committers mailing list Bf-committers@blender.org http://lists.blender.org/mailman/listinfo/bf-committers
Re: [Bf-committers] 2.56-beta release AHOY!
thanks Diego On Wed, Dec 29, 2010 at 5:03 PM, Diego B wrote: > Hi, > > I move the file to my home directory, so you can upload the new one. > > - Diego > > On Wed, Dec 29, 2010 at 7:58 PM, Diego B wrote: > > Hi, > > > > The bad one is: > > > > blender-2.56-beta-FreeBSD-amd64.tbz ? > > > > - > > > > Diego > > > > On Wed, Dec 29, 2010 at 7:47 PM, pete larabell > wrote: > >> awesome! Thanks so much Thomas! > >> > >> On Wed, Dec 29, 2010 at 4:44 PM, Thomas Dinges > wrote: > >> > >>> Just be patient, someone with acces will read this and delete the old > >>> file. :) > >>> > >>> Thomas > >>> > >>> Am 29.12.2010 23:33, schrieb pete larabell: > >>> > So, do I need to send an email somewhere asking someone to do that, > or > >>> was > >>> > me indicating the error, and you responding to it, enough that > someone > >>> will > >>> > do it?? > >>> > > >>> > On Wed, Dec 29, 2010 at 3:05 PM, Thomas Dinges > >>> wrote: > >>> > > >>> >> You have to wait until someone with acces deletes the old file. > >>> >> > >>> >> No problem! Don't you worry! :) > >>> >> > >>> >> cheers, > >>> >> Thomas > >>> >> > >>> >> Am 29.12.2010 21:34, schrieb pete larabell: > >>> >>> Hey guys, > >>> >>> > >>> >>> I uploaded a build called blender-2.56-beta-FreeBSD-amd64.tbz to > >>> >>> download.blender.org/incoming but forgot to build it with RELEASE > >>> >> optimized > >>> >>> compiler flags. I just rebuilt with appropriate flags, but now > can't > >>> >>> overwrite the "bad" file I uploaded first. Is there a way I can > >>> overwrite > >>> >>> that with the new one??? > >>> >>> > >>> >>> Thanks, and sorry for the error. > >>> >>> Pete > >>> >>> > >>> >>> On Wed, Dec 29, 2010 at 1:40 PM, Damien Plisson< > >>> damien.plis...@yahoo.fr > >>> >>> wrote: > >>> >>> > >>> Hi Ton, > >>> > >>> Using cmake on 33942 and building with xcode gave me the 2.56 > >>> directory > >>> >> in > >>> the app bundle fine. > >>> And the 2.56 directory is also created at runtime in the > Application > >>> Support/Blender folder. > >>> > >>> Maybe it is an issue with cmake/makefiles ? > >>> > >>> Damien > >>> > >>> Le 29 déc. 2010 à 20:10, Ton Roosendaal a écrit : > >>> > >>> > Hi all, > >>> > > >>> > Let's freeze svn for a day to prevent confusing situations, and > have > >>> > release builders work on what they need to get a good binary! > Only do > >>> > commits related to making the builds please. > >>> > > >>> > SVN needs to be tagged still; but last commit from me was 33942. > Tag > >>> > will be announced here too. > >>> > > >>> > Send out binaries via the usual channels, or ask me for where to > put > >>> > them! > >>> > > >>> > Note: cmake for my Mac failed to make a 2.56 directory in the app > >>> > bundle... needs to be checked on. > >>> > > >>> > Thanks! > >>> > > >>> > -Ton- > >>> > > >>> > > >>> >> > > >>> > Ton Roosendaal Blender Foundation t...@blender.org > >>> >> www.blender.org > >>> > Blender Institute Entrepotdok 57A 1018AD Amsterdam The > >>> Netherlands > >>> > > >>> > ___ > >>> > Bf-committers mailing list > >>> > Bf-committers@blender.org > >>> > http://lists.blender.org/mailman/listinfo/bf-committers > >>> ___ > >>> Bf-committers mailing list > >>> Bf-committers@blender.org > >>> http://lists.blender.org/mailman/listinfo/bf-committers > >>> > >>> >>> ___ > >>> >>> Bf-committers mailing list > >>> >>> Bf-committers@blender.org > >>> >>> http://lists.blender.org/mailman/listinfo/bf-committers > >>> >> ___ > >>> >> Bf-committers mailing list > >>> >> Bf-committers@blender.org > >>> >> http://lists.blender.org/mailman/listinfo/bf-committers > >>> >> > >>> > ___ > >>> > Bf-committers mailing list > >>> > Bf-committers@blender.org > >>> > http://lists.blender.org/mailman/listinfo/bf-committers > >>> > >>> ___ > >>> Bf-committers mailing list > >>> Bf-committers@blender.org > >>> http://lists.blender.org/mailman/listinfo/bf-committers > >>> > >> ___ > >> Bf-committers mailing list > >> Bf-committers@blender.org > >> http://lists.blender.org/mailman/listinfo/bf-committers > >> > > > ___ > Bf-committers mailing list > Bf-committers@blender.org > http://lists.blender.org/mailman/listinfo/bf-committers > ___ Bf-committers mailing list Bf-committers@blender.org http://lists.blender.org/mailman/listinfo/bf-committers
Re: [Bf-committers] 2.56-beta release AHOY!
Both i386 and amd64 tarballs are uploaded. I sent them to other FreeBSD users to test to make sure they extracted and ran successfully. :) they are: blender-2.56-beta-FreeBSD-i386.tbz blender-2.56-beta-FreeBSD-amd64.tbz Cheers, Pete On Wed, Dec 29, 2010 at 1:10 PM, Ton Roosendaal wrote: > Hi all, > > Let's freeze svn for a day to prevent confusing situations, and have > release builders work on what they need to get a good binary! Only do > commits related to making the builds please. > > SVN needs to be tagged still; but last commit from me was 33942. Tag > will be announced here too. > > Send out binaries via the usual channels, or ask me for where to put > them! > > Note: cmake for my Mac failed to make a 2.56 directory in the app > bundle... needs to be checked on. > > Thanks! > > -Ton- > > > Ton Roosendaal Blender Foundation t...@blender.orgwww.blender.org > Blender Institute Entrepotdok 57A 1018AD Amsterdam The Netherlands > > ___ > Bf-committers mailing list > Bf-committers@blender.org > http://lists.blender.org/mailman/listinfo/bf-committers > ___ Bf-committers mailing list Bf-committers@blender.org http://lists.blender.org/mailman/listinfo/bf-committers
Re: [Bf-committers] 2.56-beta release AHOY!
Perfect, I will move those to my folder until all the others are ready. On Wed, Dec 29, 2010 at 8:17 PM, pete larabell wrote: > Both i386 and amd64 tarballs are uploaded. I sent them to other FreeBSD > users to test to make sure they extracted and ran successfully. :) > > they are: > > blender-2.56-beta-FreeBSD-i386.tbz > blender-2.56-beta-FreeBSD-amd64.tbz > > > Cheers, > Pete > > On Wed, Dec 29, 2010 at 1:10 PM, Ton Roosendaal wrote: > >> Hi all, >> >> Let's freeze svn for a day to prevent confusing situations, and have >> release builders work on what they need to get a good binary! Only do >> commits related to making the builds please. >> >> SVN needs to be tagged still; but last commit from me was 33942. Tag >> will be announced here too. >> >> Send out binaries via the usual channels, or ask me for where to put >> them! >> >> Note: cmake for my Mac failed to make a 2.56 directory in the app >> bundle... needs to be checked on. >> >> Thanks! >> >> -Ton- >> >> >> Ton Roosendaal Blender Foundation t...@blender.org www.blender.org >> Blender Institute Entrepotdok 57A 1018AD Amsterdam The Netherlands >> >> ___ >> Bf-committers mailing list >> Bf-committers@blender.org >> http://lists.blender.org/mailman/listinfo/bf-committers >> > ___ > Bf-committers mailing list > Bf-committers@blender.org > http://lists.blender.org/mailman/listinfo/bf-committers > ___ Bf-committers mailing list Bf-committers@blender.org http://lists.blender.org/mailman/listinfo/bf-committers
Re: [Bf-committers] 2.56-beta release AHOY!
Hi, I have just tagged bf-extensions, revision 1327. I believe that Nathan will ask builders to build with a specific tag version of bf-blender, which he usually links with svn-externals to a specific bf-extensions tag. We've just added some scripts that were scheduled for release after discussing right now about it in #blenderpython. I might be wrong but it would be best waiting for him to build. Regards, Luca _ http://www.mindrones.com ___ Bf-committers mailing list Bf-committers@blender.org http://lists.blender.org/mailman/listinfo/bf-committers
Re: [Bf-committers] 2.56-beta release AHOY!
Linux 32-bit and 64-bit tarballs uploaded to download.blender.org/incoming. Ken ___ Bf-committers mailing list Bf-committers@blender.org http://lists.blender.org/mailman/listinfo/bf-committers
Re: [Bf-committers] 2.56-beta release AHOY!
Both on my home folder, thanks. On Wed, Dec 29, 2010 at 9:42 PM, Ken Hughes wrote: > Linux 32-bit and 64-bit tarballs uploaded to download.blender.org/incoming. > > Ken > ___ > Bf-committers mailing list > Bf-committers@blender.org > http://lists.blender.org/mailman/listinfo/bf-committers > ___ Bf-committers mailing list Bf-committers@blender.org http://lists.blender.org/mailman/listinfo/bf-committers
Re: [Bf-committers] 2.56-beta release AHOY!
It seems that I got home in time to kindly ask for people to include the blenderplayer whenever possible. thanks, Dalai -- I almost committed a small patch I had ready while with no internet ... waiting for svn "unfreeze" ;) 2010/12/29 Diego B > Both on my home folder, thanks. > > On Wed, Dec 29, 2010 at 9:42 PM, Ken Hughes wrote: > > Linux 32-bit and 64-bit tarballs uploaded to > download.blender.org/incoming. > > > > Ken > > ___ > > Bf-committers mailing list > > Bf-committers@blender.org > > http://lists.blender.org/mailman/listinfo/bf-committers > > > ___ > Bf-committers mailing list > Bf-committers@blender.org > http://lists.blender.org/mailman/listinfo/bf-committers > ___ Bf-committers mailing list Bf-committers@blender.org http://lists.blender.org/mailman/listinfo/bf-committers
Re: [Bf-committers] 2.56-beta release AHOY!
Should I wait until further notice, svn up with new python scripts, rebuild and re-upload? On Wed, Dec 29, 2010 at 7:31 PM, Dalai Felinto wrote: > It seems that I got home in time to kindly ask for people to include the > blenderplayer whenever possible. > thanks, > > Dalai > -- I almost committed a small patch I had ready while with no internet ... > waiting for svn "unfreeze" ;) > 2010/12/29 Diego B > > > Both on my home folder, thanks. > > > > On Wed, Dec 29, 2010 at 9:42 PM, Ken Hughes wrote: > > > Linux 32-bit and 64-bit tarballs uploaded to > > download.blender.org/incoming. > > > > > > Ken > > > ___ > > > Bf-committers mailing list > > > Bf-committers@blender.org > > > http://lists.blender.org/mailman/listinfo/bf-committers > > > > > ___ > > Bf-committers mailing list > > Bf-committers@blender.org > > http://lists.blender.org/mailman/listinfo/bf-committers > > > ___ > Bf-committers mailing list > Bf-committers@blender.org > http://lists.blender.org/mailman/listinfo/bf-committers > ___ Bf-committers mailing list Bf-committers@blender.org http://lists.blender.org/mailman/listinfo/bf-committers
Re: [Bf-committers] 2.56-beta release AHOY!
Ton, Nathan, I will be back in about 8 hours, if you are back before and need the files there are in my home on the folder "release". - Diego On Wed, Dec 29, 2010 at 11:40 PM, pete larabell wrote: > Should I wait until further notice, svn up with new python scripts, rebuild > and re-upload? > > On Wed, Dec 29, 2010 at 7:31 PM, Dalai Felinto wrote: > >> It seems that I got home in time to kindly ask for people to include the >> blenderplayer whenever possible. >> thanks, >> >> Dalai >> -- I almost committed a small patch I had ready while with no internet ... >> waiting for svn "unfreeze" ;) >> 2010/12/29 Diego B >> >> > Both on my home folder, thanks. >> > >> > On Wed, Dec 29, 2010 at 9:42 PM, Ken Hughes wrote: >> > > Linux 32-bit and 64-bit tarballs uploaded to >> > download.blender.org/incoming. >> > > >> > > Ken >> > > ___ >> > > Bf-committers mailing list >> > > Bf-committers@blender.org >> > > http://lists.blender.org/mailman/listinfo/bf-committers >> > > >> > ___ >> > Bf-committers mailing list >> > Bf-committers@blender.org >> > http://lists.blender.org/mailman/listinfo/bf-committers >> > >> ___ >> Bf-committers mailing list >> Bf-committers@blender.org >> http://lists.blender.org/mailman/listinfo/bf-committers >> > ___ > Bf-committers mailing list > Bf-committers@blender.org > http://lists.blender.org/mailman/listinfo/bf-committers > ___ Bf-committers mailing list Bf-committers@blender.org http://lists.blender.org/mailman/listinfo/bf-committers
Re: [Bf-committers] 2.56-beta release AHOY!
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 29.12.2010 21:10, Ton Roosendaal wrote: > SVN needs to be tagged still; but last commit from me was 33942. Tag > will be announced here too. Appologies for the slow tagging speed, but builders can now use: svn co -r 33947 https://svn.blender.org/svnroot/bf-blender/tags/blender-2.56-release (Yes, it's a checkout, not an export, for proper build info in splash and bpy API). While we're all building, I continue with the release notes and pages. (Yep, having that download link properly done is on the TODO list). /Nathan - -- Nathan Letwory Blender Foundation | Letwory Interactive http://www.blender.org | http://www.letworyinteractive.com -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJNHDlMAAoJEKtfN7KsE0TtloQH/RZg1rQe/oBe+XoHuDgZ1zAc V1gE1d2zOR7v/vubK+HIPrWF6vDuNJLbvQ5b52xUP5+1gvhifUSGmGo8dkiioIHn Ry7+IMqVt8qswShYUJksKakYcteztYdqsBodnQlvx2Gi0dfJqOl2NqlTv3rKfvE0 45zPINBPCfgKQbud1+mtXFa43lKwivZIFspsaaXf8CbH0BHNIsBn8YHvDoayGyam b08UpSnGIRPIdAzoEfboZEunIrZKcslLQAHOmq2az6iw3CAjPCgIR5E32qW9lCu1 tBHNUdm2xav7Lyyon2HnN9QUJEYnjA+jf9vOsCrG2iIFqVIsHqOBpLIzHeW1XD8= =o7gh -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ Bf-committers mailing list Bf-committers@blender.org http://lists.blender.org/mailman/listinfo/bf-committers
