Re: [Bibdesk-users] Working with a master and a local .bib file

2020-08-23 Thread Kevin Fjelsted
Since I am using VoiceOver screenreader for accessibility purposes on the Mac 
drag and drop doesn’t work for me. I use the export menu to export entries from 
a master file and then import them in the local file for the particular project 
I am building.
-Kevin


> On Aug 23, 2020, at 5:00 AM, Daniele Avitabile  wrote:
> 
> Dear All,
> 
> I'm relatively new to BibDesk, and I am trying to improve my workflow. I have 
> tried to search for this information but could not find it, so feel free to 
> redirect me to the documentation, or other discussions. It seems so basic to 
> me that I'm almost sure it's been discussed plenty of times before.
> 
> I plan to build a master file, a large collection of entries, that I will 
> keep in order, with many pdfs, sublists, etc. This master file will live in a 
> Dropbox folder. 
> 
> However, when I'm writing a paper, I only need some of these references, and 
> the corresponding .bib file lives next to the .tex sources. It's a local 
> file. I will most likely share this file with collaborators, and clearly I 
> don't want to expose my master file. 
> 
> How do you typically work in this setup? Do you keep the master and the local 
> file open, and drag references from one to the other? There's something 
> smarter to do? Am I missing something? 
> 
> Thanks 
> Daniele 
> ___
> Bibdesk-users mailing list
> Bibdesk-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bibdesk-users

___
Bibdesk-users mailing list
Bibdesk-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bibdesk-users


[Bibdesk-users] Citing Ancient Sources utilizing BibDesk

2013-03-02 Thread Kevin Fjelsted
 I am looking fora solution to implement the style described in the following 
article (enclosed). Is there a package combination and BibDesk solution that 
would permit one to follow the format described?

-Kevin

Guidelines for Citing Ancient Sources
Prof. Eva von Dassow

The same principles and purposes underlie citation practices no matter 
what types of items are the objects of reference – ancient sources (texts and 
artifacts), works of art, or works of modern scholarship.  Citation of ancient 
sources differs in form, but not in principle, from citation of modern works; 
likewise, citation of artifacts differs in form, but not in principle, from 
citation of texts.  All citations and references must include specific and 
accurate identification of: 1) the item in question, 2) its publication or the 
publication in which it is found (if published; otherwise, its provenience and 
location), and 3) the part(s) of the item cited or referred to; furthermore, 4) 
the item’s author(s) or creator(s) must be identified and credited, if 
individual author(s) or creator(s) exist and are known.  Ancient texts and 
artifacts are normally accessed through modern publications.  Thus, when citing 
or referring to these types of primary sources, it is necessary to identify 
both the ancient source and the modern publication, distinguishing the former 
clearly from the latter, according to each of the criteria enumerated above.
A reference to a modern publication provides the following information: author; 
publication title; facts of publication; and indication of the place within the 
publication to which reference is made (usually by page numbers).  This simple 
scheme is complicated by a variety of factors.  For instance, if the 
publication in question is a component of a larger work, such as an article 
within a book, an entry within an encyclopedia, or a volume in a series, the 
larger work must be distinguished from its component, both by title and by 
editor or author; thus, the reference gives the information about the larger 
work along with the information about the component (usually the facts of 
publication are identical and therefore not repeated).  In an analogous 
fashion, a reference to an ancient source should include both the information 
about the modern publication and the information about the ancient source, as 
follows: title or other identification of the ancient source; modern author, 
translator, or editor; title of the modern publication; facts of publication; 
indication of the place within the modern publication where the ancient source 
is found (usually pages); and, as applicable, indication of the place within 
the ancient source to which reference is made (on this, see further below).
Students must use, and accurately follow, a handbook of style in order 
to learn how to cite and refer to modern publications, both in bibliographic 
entries and in notes or parenthetical references (note the differences among 
these!).  The most comprehensive such handbook is the Chicago Manual of Style, 
14th ed. (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1993).  I recommend that 
students use Mary Lynn Rampolla’s Pocket Guide to Writing in History, 5th ed. 
(Boston: Bedford/St. Martin’s, 2007), a concise handbook which provides 
documentation models based on the guidelines established by the Chicago Manual 
of Style.  Since there exists no handbook for students which provides 
guidelines for citing ancient sources other than the Bible and classical Greek 
and Latin literature, I have written up the following instructions and examples 
to explain how to cite ancient sources of various types.

•   Ancient literary works

Standard book, chapter, and paragraph or verse divisions exist for classical 
works of literature and for biblical books.  Citations of classical works give 
the name of the author, the title of the work (this can be omitted if only one 
work is known for that author), and the book and paragraph numbers, or line 
numbers in the case of poetry, for the passage cited; examples follow:

•   According to Homer, Odysseus landed in Egypt and, after a 
fierce battle between his men and the Egyptians, stayed there for seven years 
as a guest of the king (Homer, Odyssey, XIV.257-287).
•   The poems of Homer formed a common cultural reference point for 
classical Greek authors; both Herodotus and Thucydides quote them and refer to 
them (see, e.g., Herodotus, 2.116-7, and Thucydides, 1.3, 1.9, and 4.24).

Books of the Bible are cited in a similar manner, but normally without naming 
authors:

•   Whereas according to II Samuel 24.1 it is God’s anger against 
Israel that caused David to take a census of his people, the Chronicler makes 
Satan the agent who incited David to do this (I Chron. 21.1).
•   There are numerous stories and motifs that appear both in 
biblical literature and in ancient Greek literature.  For 

Re: [Bibdesk-users] Citing Ancient Sources utilizing BibDesk

2013-03-02 Thread Kevin Fjelsted
Thanks for the pointers. I specifically want to use Latex not word or pages 
since the formatting is reducible once defined. I am a student so just learning 
Latex. I am blind and I have found that Latex gives me a much more secure 
experience than word or pages because word and pages really don't reliably 
format a doc unless one confirms that it looks correctly on the screen.
Seeing actually placement on the screen is not something that the Mac Voiceover 
or windows screen reading software supports.
THus Latex is perfect in that it supports command based formatting. I have 
found that much of BibDesk is accessible via Mac Voiceover so when I received  
the enclosed requirements I first turned to BibDesk.
The requirements appear to be Chicago style with some modifications required to 
support archeological and historical sources that are cited through other 
primary sources.

Since there are extra fields required there must be some interplay between 
BibDesk and perhaps a modified style.
-Kevin

On Mar 2, 2013, at 11:26 AM, Dr. Adam M. Goldstein PhD MSLIS 
z_californianus-dated-1362677208.ea8...@shiftingbalance.org wrote:

 Well, that's a little more than most of us on the BibDesk users list can read 
 without drifting off...is there a specific example you can give us from one 
 of these kinds of sources?
 
 The best place for this question is probably a BibTeX users list, because the 
 question is really about the style files. 
 
 You should probably check out biblatex because of the enthusiasm people have 
 for how easy it is to customize. 
 
 If you are looking for references you can export to Word or Pages, you can 
 design templates using BibDesk.
 
 Adam
 
 --
 Adam M. Goldstein PhD, MSLIS
 --
 z_california...@shiftingbalance.org
 http://www.shiftingbalance.org
 http://www.twitter.com/shiftingbalance
 --
 http://www.itis.gov/servlet/SingleRpt/SingleRpt?search_topic=TSNsearch_value=180621
 --
 (914) 637-2717 (msg)
 --
 Dept of Philosophy
 Iona College
 715 North Avenue
 New Rochelle NY 10801
 http://www.iona.edu/faculty/agoldstein
 
 On Mar 2, 2013, at 12:01, Kevin Fjelsted kfjels...@gmail.com wrote:
 
 I am looking fora solution to implement the style described in the following 
 article (enclosed). Is there a package combination and BibDesk solution that 
 would permit one to follow the format described?
 
 -Kevin
 
 Guidelines for Citing Ancient Sources
 Prof. Eva von Dassow
 
   The same principles and purposes underlie citation practices no matter 
 what types of items are the objects of reference – ancient sources (texts 
 and artifacts), works of art, or works of modern scholarship.  Citation of 
 ancient sources differs in form, but not in principle, from citation of 
 modern works; likewise, citation of artifacts differs in form, but not in 
 principle, from citation of texts.  All citations and references must 
 include specific and accurate identification of: 1) the item in question, 2) 
 its publication or the publication in which it is found (if published; 
 otherwise, its provenience and location), and 3) the part(s) of the item 
 cited or referred to; furthermore, 4) the item’s author(s) or creator(s) 
 must be identified and credited, if individual author(s) or creator(s) exist 
 and are known.  Ancient texts and artifacts are normally accessed through 
 modern publications.  Thus, when citing or referring to these types of 
 primary sources, it is necessary to identify both the ancient source and the 
 modern publication, distinguishing the former clearly from the latter, 
 according to each of the criteria enumerated above.
 A reference to a modern publication provides the following information: 
 author; publication title; facts of publication; and indication of the place 
 within the publication to which reference is made (usually by page numbers). 
  This simple scheme is complicated by a variety of factors.  For instance, 
 if the publication in question is a component of a larger work, such as an 
 article within a book, an entry within an encyclopedia, or a volume in a 
 series, the larger work must be distinguished from its component, both by 
 title and by editor or author; thus, the reference gives the information 
 about the larger work along with the information about the component 
 (usually the facts of publication are identical and therefore not repeated). 
  In an analogous fashion, a reference to an ancient source should include 
 both the information about the modern publication and the information about 
 the ancient source, as follows: title or other identification of the ancient 
 source; modern author, translator, or editor; title of the modern 
 publication; facts of publication; indication of the place within the modern 
 publication where the ancient source is found (usually pages); and, as 
 applicable, indication of the place within the ancient source to which 
 reference is made (on this, see further below).
   Students must use

[Bibdesk-users] Citing a web page

2013-02-24 Thread Kevin Fjelsted
WHen I use the URL cite type  in BibDesk there is no field for the actualURL? 
Am I supposed to use the URLDate field for the URL?

-Kevin


--
Everyone hates slow websites. So do we.
Make your web apps faster with AppDynamics
Download AppDynamics Lite for free today:
http://p.sf.net/sfu/appdyn_d2d_feb
___
Bibdesk-users mailing list
Bibdesk-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bibdesk-users