Re: [Bibdesk-users] what is bibdesk?

2007-10-09 Thread jiho

On 2007-October-08  , at 18:37 , Maxwell, Adam R wrote:
 On 10/08/07 09:21, jiho [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 On 2007-October-08  , at 18:03 , Simon Spiegel wrote:
 [...]

 I also use latex2rtf but simply because there is no real alternative.
 I also found it has many limitations:
 - I have found that it does not respect natbib settings for inline
 citations (at least)

 Can you provide a sample?

I guess I was using an outdated version of latex2rtf (I used the one  
in MacPorts, with tetex) because I cannot make the svn version fail  
now. IIRC there was a problem when specifying punctuation other that  
the default in \bibpunct. latex2rtf used to always output (SomeName,  
2000; SomeOtherName, 2004) instead of what was specified in bibpunct.
Anyway, that seems fixed now, which is a good thing.

 - it does not support utf8 coded documents

 Use the version from latex2rtf project's svn.  It supports utf8,  
 and also
 has some graphics sizing improvements.

I see that. I usually rely on utf coded characters for accents only  
(I try to use latex code for other symbols) and it seems to work fine  
indeed. That's another great news.

 - the equations are converted to pictures (in the best cases)

 Really?  One reason I stick with latex2rtf is because it gives  
 editable
 equations, and doesn't convert them to pictures unless you tell it  
 to. YMMV.

Current svn apparently converts latex equations to rtf indeed but,  
when they get a bit interesting (sums, fractions etc.) I cannot view  
them in either TextEdit, Pages or even NeoOffice. While thats not  
surprising for TextEdit and Pages, I would expect NeoOffice to be  
better. I seems I'll have to install MS Word in the end. Gasp.

Thanks for pointing the improvements in the latest version.

JiHO
---
http://jo.irisson.free.fr/



-
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc.
Still grepping through log files to find problems?  Stop.
Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser.
Download your FREE copy of Splunk now  http://get.splunk.com/
___
Bibdesk-users mailing list
Bibdesk-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bibdesk-users


Re: [Bibdesk-users] what is bibdesk?

2007-10-09 Thread Adam R. Maxwell

On Oct 9, 2007, at 04:07, jiho wrote:

 On 2007-October-08  , at 18:37 , Maxwell, Adam R wrote:
 On 10/08/07 09:21, jiho [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 latex2rtf used to always output (SomeName,
 2000; SomeOtherName, 2004) instead of what was specified in bibpunct.
 Anyway, that seems fixed now, which is a good thing.

I think bibpunct support was added in the last year, but there hadn't  
been a new version for 2-3 years.

 - the equations are converted to pictures (in the best cases)

 Really?  One reason I stick with latex2rtf is because it gives
 editable
 equations, and doesn't convert them to pictures unless you tell it
 to. YMMV.

 Current svn apparently converts latex equations to rtf indeed but,
 when they get a bit interesting (sums, fractions etc.) I cannot view
 them in either TextEdit, Pages or even NeoOffice. While thats not
 surprising for TextEdit and Pages, I would expect NeoOffice to be
 better. I seems I'll have to install MS Word in the end. Gasp.

Word is the only thing that handles equations and figures in RTF  
correctly IME.

 Thanks for pointing the improvements in the latest version.

No problem...I occasionally submit patches (hence the svn version's  
usage of sips to convert pdf-png on OS X), so I like to see it used  
and tested.

-- 
adam


-
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc.
Still grepping through log files to find problems?  Stop.
Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser.
Download your FREE copy of Splunk now  http://get.splunk.com/
___
Bibdesk-users mailing list
Bibdesk-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bibdesk-users


Re: [Bibdesk-users] what is bibdesk? at a tangent

2007-10-09 Thread Nathan Paxton
	We might take a look at http://thedata.org/citation and http:// 
gking.harvard.edu/files/cite.pdf


	These try to take a look at linking to the thing itself rather than  
a location for the thing.


-N
On 9 Oct 2007, at 11:47 AM, Jason Davies wrote:


incidentally, is there an 'accepted' way to link to things like
podcasts (yet)? As more and more become legitimate sources
(prestigious speakers and stable access), is anyone thinking
about how to cite them? In the meantime, does anyone have any
sugestions (eg can we get a unique link to use in BibDesk that
will open a podcast? I know that you can be taken to a
particular podcast on the web, but what about when you have it?
just the usual local-file route to open iTunes? can we jump to a
particular moment to hear a quote?)

I realise the last is very unrealistic (currently) but this is
becoming an issue for me in my work (chiefly when i do Education  
materials).




-- 
---

This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc.
Still grepping through log files to find problems?  Stop.
Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a  
browser.

Download your FREE copy of Splunk now  http://get.splunk.com/
___
Bibdesk-users mailing list
Bibdesk-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bibdesk-users


--
Nathan A. Paxton
Ph.D. Candidate
Dept. of Government, Harvard University

Resident Tutor
John Winthrop House, Harvard University

napaxton AT fas DOT harvard DOT edu
http://www.fas.harvard.edu/~napaxton
 
===
When you have to stay eight years away from California, you live in a  
perpetual state of homesickness.

- Ronald Reagan

The most courageous act is still to think for yourself.  Aloud.
-Coco Chanel
 
===






-
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc.
Still grepping through log files to find problems?  Stop.
Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser.
Download your FREE copy of Splunk now  http://get.splunk.com/___
Bibdesk-users mailing list
Bibdesk-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bibdesk-users


Re: [Bibdesk-users] what is bibdesk?

2007-10-09 Thread Ingrid Giffin



On 10/9/07 7:20 AM, Bruce Pourciau [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 
 On Oct 7, 2007, at 9:47 PM, Ingrid Giffin wrote:
 
 
 I tried looking at MacTex (I think it was), but I really don¹t need the
 heavy typesetting capabilities. I ran screaming to Mellel. I use BibDesk for
 my master publications database because the interface is so nice, although,
 as I said in another post, I have to use Bookends in between BibDesk and
 Mellel.
 
 
 Those who do need the typesetting and cross-referencing abilities of LaTeX,
 but who have run screaming from its complication and coding requirements,
 might want to look at LyX (http://www.lyx.org/), which is a word processor
 front end to LaTeX. You work in LyX as you would in any word processor, but
 when you wish to view the finished product, LyX calls up TeX and has it
 typeset your document.
 
 I use LyX with Bibdesk.
 
 Bruce
 

The idea sounds good, but the LyX page lists several other required
packages. Of the first two, Qt and Xforms, Qt costs several hundred dollars
and the Xforms web site is dead. This doesn't look promising.

--Ingrid



-
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc.
Still grepping through log files to find problems?  Stop.
Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser.
Download your FREE copy of Splunk now  http://get.splunk.com/
___
Bibdesk-users mailing list
Bibdesk-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bibdesk-users


Re: [Bibdesk-users] what is bibdesk? at a tangent

2007-10-09 Thread Jason Davies
Doesn't a custom Local File field work, when you have set iTunes as the
system default for opening podcasts?

I was thinking more about referencing for publication and dissemination...


-
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc.
Still grepping through log files to find problems?  Stop.
Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser.
Download your FREE copy of Splunk now  http://get.splunk.com/
___
Bibdesk-users mailing list
Bibdesk-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bibdesk-users


Re: [Bibdesk-users] what is bibdesk?

2007-10-09 Thread jiho

On 2007-October-09  , at 19:39 , Ingrid Giffin wrote:
 On 10/9/07 7:20 AM, Bruce Pourciau  
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 On Oct 7, 2007, at 9:47 PM, Ingrid Giffin wrote:
 I tried looking at MacTex (I think it was), but I really don’t  
 need the
 heavy typesetting capabilities. I ran screaming to Mellel. I use  
 BibDesk for
 my master publications database because the interface is so nice,  
 although,
 as I said in another post, I have to use Bookends in between  
 BibDesk and
 Mellel.

 Those who do need the typesetting and cross-referencing abilities  
 of LaTeX,
 but who have run screaming from its complication and coding  
 requirements,
 might want to look at LyX (http://www.lyx.org/), which is a word  
 processor
 front end to LaTeX. You work in LyX as you would in any word  
 processor, but
 when you wish to view the finished product, LyX calls up TeX and  
 has it
 typeset your document.

 I use LyX with Bibdesk.

 The idea sounds good, but the LyX page lists several other required
 packages. Of the first two, Qt and Xforms, Qt costs several hundred  
 dollars
 and the Xforms web site is dead. This doesn't look promising

No no lyx works out of the box on os x (provided you have a TeX  
system of course). Just download the dmg and install everything:
ftp://ftp.lyx.org/pub/lyx/bin/1.5.2

JiHO
---
http://jo.irisson.free.fr/



-
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc.
Still grepping through log files to find problems?  Stop.
Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser.
Download your FREE copy of Splunk now  http://get.splunk.com/
___
Bibdesk-users mailing list
Bibdesk-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bibdesk-users


Re: [Bibdesk-users] what is bibdesk?

2007-10-08 Thread Simon Spiegel



 I can imagine that Tex held some appeal to some people at some point
 in time, but there is little use I see in it for myself. For me,
 TextEdit is more easy and flexible.

 Depends.  On the negative side, I find LaTeX code annoying to read and
 write, and things like encodings and font changes are insane (unless
 you use XeTeX).  I use BibTeX, but I think its style language sucks.

Take a look at the biblatex package. Suddenly, even the most complex  
bibliographic style becomes rather easy to implement ...

simon

--
Simon Spiegel
Steinhaldenstr. 50
8002 Zürich

Telephon: ++41 44 451 5334
Mobophon: ++41 76 459 60 39


http://www.simifilm.ch

Was soll aus mir mal werden, wenn ich mal nicht mehr bin? Robert  
Gernhardt



-
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc.
Still grepping through log files to find problems?  Stop.
Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser.
Download your FREE copy of Splunk now  http://get.splunk.com/
___
Bibdesk-users mailing list
Bibdesk-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bibdesk-users


[Bibdesk-users] what is bibdesk?

2007-10-07 Thread Derick Fay

I'm not one of the developers but you both know that Bibdesk is a
software for generating Bibtex-files which are used in LaTeX-
documents.


I wonder how many users would agree with this characterization -- I  
don't use BibTex at all - do most other BibDesk users?


I see BibDesk as a reference manager and search tool which happens to  
offer BibTex among its output formats, but which should have broad  
appeal beyond BibTex users..  I use it with Nisus Writer Pro and  
Pages, primarily using .rtf export templates (e.g. the American  
Anthropologist template found here: http://dfay.fastmail.fm/ 
bibdesk/ ) set up following the directions on the Wiki provided in  
Adam Goldstein's post ( http://bibdesk.sourceforge.net/wiki/index.php/ 
Export_Templates ).


=
Derick A. Fay, Ph.D.
Visiting Assistant Professor
Department of Anthropology
Union College
Schenectady, NY 12308




-
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc.
Still grepping through log files to find problems?  Stop.
Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser.
Download your FREE copy of Splunk now  http://get.splunk.com/___
Bibdesk-users mailing list
Bibdesk-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bibdesk-users


Re: [Bibdesk-users] what is bibdesk?

2007-10-07 Thread Ingrid Giffin

On 10/7/07 8:36 PM, P Kishor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Mellel + Bookends seems to do exactly what I dream of, but I don't want to use
 Mellel because it can't handle South Asian scripts.

Possibly veering off topic here, but FYI, there is a thread on this at

http://forum.redlers.com/viewtopic.php?t=969highlight=south+asian

(although for all I know you are one of the posters!)



-
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc.
Still grepping through log files to find problems?  Stop.
Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser.
Download your FREE copy of Splunk now  http://get.splunk.com/
___
Bibdesk-users mailing list
Bibdesk-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bibdesk-users


Re: [Bibdesk-users] what is bibdesk?

2007-10-07 Thread Adam R. Maxwell

On Oct 7, 2007, at 20:58, Michael McCracken wrote:

 On 10/7/07, Derick Fay [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 I'm not one of the developers but you both know that Bibdesk is a
 software for generating Bibtex-files which are used in LaTeX-
 documents.
 I wonder how many users would agree with this characterization -- I  
 don't
 use BibTex at all - do most other BibDesk users?


 I don't have any numbers to back this up, but based on feature
 requests  bugs throughout the years, and the fact that everyone I
 know who uses BibDesk also uses LaTeX, my impression is that the
 majority of BibDesk users are LaTeX users.

I've always had the same impression: most of us use LaTeX, although I  
now know of at least four on this list who don't.

Some people avoid BD because of the BibTeX/LaTeX association, but I  
think it's useful as a general purpose reference manager because of  
the searching/ranking/grouping/filing features, and we shouldn't  
forget that.  I think the UI is better than most of the other tools as  
well.

-- 
adam

-
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc.
Still grepping through log files to find problems?  Stop.
Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser.
Download your FREE copy of Splunk now  http://get.splunk.com/
___
Bibdesk-users mailing list
Bibdesk-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bibdesk-users


Re: [Bibdesk-users] what is bibdesk?

2007-10-07 Thread Adam R. Maxwell

On Oct 7, 2007, at 19:36, P Kishor wrote:

 On 10/7/07, Derick Fay [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


 I'm not one of the developers but you both know that Bibdesk is a
 software for generating Bibtex-files which are used in LaTeX-
 documents.
 I wonder how many users would agree with this characterization -- I  
 don't
 use BibTex at all - do most other BibDesk users?

 I see BibDesk as a reference manager and search tool which happens  
 to offer
 BibTex among its output formats, but which should have broad appeal  
 beyond
 BibTex users..

 I am with you Derick. I have little use for BibTex. Funnily, I
 installed MacTex a few weeks ago for the first time... after 750 Mb of
 all manner of stuff, I was able to open Tex files and view them as
 PDF. I was not very thrilled.

There are smaller distributions available, I think...but TeX still  
requires a lot of arcane files.

 I can imagine that Tex held some appeal to some people at some point
 in time, but there is little use I see in it for myself. For me,
 TextEdit is more easy and flexible.

Depends.  On the negative side, I find LaTeX code annoying to read and  
write, and things like encodings and font changes are insane (unless  
you use XeTeX).  I use BibTeX, but I think its style language sucks.

However, LaTeX's benefits outweigh the problems, for me.  It's  
portable (plain text), scalable (hundreds of pages is trivial),  
handles floats and equations, and has actually functional captioning,  
numbering, and cross-referencing.  For example, I have never checked a  
citation list or figure numbering in my LaTeX documents, in spite of  
rearranging figures and sections or changing bibliography styles.  In  
grad school we could always tell when someone had a paper due, just by  
the amount of cursing (at Word) in the computer lab.

 Scrivener can use the text input manager's \cite{blah hit esc to
 auto-complete blah} technique, but Pages can't.

You should be able to use the Services in Pages.  Note that you can  
insert a formatted version or a cite key, based on search criteria  
(documented in the help book).

 Then, when everything
 is done, I am clueless as to how to convert my \cite{blah blah} into
 Blah blah. 2007. blah blah blah. I have been looking at Tom
 Counsell's Ruby script, and that might save me.

That script is probably your best bet at the moment for Pages.  I  
don't think Pages supports any reference manager directly, so all  
solutions will suck to some extent.

-- 
adam

-
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc.
Still grepping through log files to find problems?  Stop.
Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser.
Download your FREE copy of Splunk now  http://get.splunk.com/
___
Bibdesk-users mailing list
Bibdesk-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bibdesk-users