Re: Bind and blacklist IP file

2010-10-11 Thread Kalman Feher



On 11/10/10 1:02 PM, Alans alans...@gmail.com wrote:

 
   Hello,
 
 Is it possible for bind dns to check the queries, if the returned answer
 is existed in a file that contains blacklisted IPs then block it?
 
DNS RPZ may do what you want.

There is a patch on the isc.org website for 9.4,9.6 and 9.7.1-P2
Described in further detail here:
ftp://ftp.isc.org/isc/dnsrpz/isc-tn-2010-1.txt
and here:
http://www.isc.org/community/blog/201007/taking-back-dns-0

 One more thing, from where we can get/buy updated lists of categorized
 IPs/websites,
 like Gaming, Porn, Social...?
 
 Thanks,
 Alans
 
 
 
 ___
 bind-users mailing list
 bind-users@lists.isc.org
 https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users

-- 
Kal Feher 

___
bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users


Re: Bind and blacklist IP file

2010-10-11 Thread Alans
Thanks Dave, yes i know about OpenDNS, I'm trying to imlement somehting 
kind of similar to that in a small scale.
So i was wondering about Bind dns capabilities and may be third party 
stuffs that could integrate with bind dns in addition to the ip/website 
list.


regards,
Alans

On 10/11/2010 02:06 PM, David Peall wrote:

Have you looked at:
http://www.opendns.com/

--
Dave

On 11 October 2010 13:02, Alansalans...@gmail.com  wrote:

  Hello,

Is it possible for bind dns to check the queries, if the returned answer
is existed in a file that contains blacklisted IPs then block it?

One more thing, from where we can get/buy updated lists of categorized
IPs/websites,
like Gaming, Porn, Social...?

Thanks,
Alans



___
bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users




___
bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users


Reason for separate libdns and libisc export libraries

2010-10-11 Thread Adam Tkac
Hello all,

I would like to ask you for the reason why there are separate versions
of libdns, libisc  friends, called export libraries in BIND 9.7
series.

If I understand correctly those export libs are supposed to be used
from non-BIND9 applications and some methods are lightweight compared
to full-featured BIND9 versions. In my opinion it's good idea to offer
two versions of certain methods. However I don't understand why those
methods need to be in separate library and, which is even worse, this
library has the same name as full featured BIND9 lib. It is the best
way to various run-time issues, like unresolved symbols. Another issue
is that isc-config.sh utility (which is used to determine CFLAGS,
LDFLAGS etc) has no support for this dual-library setup.

In my opinion export libs and standard libs should be merged together
or should be renamed (for example to libdns-export.so). I must note
rename is probably worse case because dynamic linker can randomly
pick methods with same name from libdns.so or from libdns-export.so.
I think the best solution is to merge two libs into one and select
methods via preprocessor flag (-DBIND9). The merged library will
look like:

isc/namespace.h:

#ifdef BIND9
#define isc_something isc__something
#endif

libisc.so:
isc_something
isc__something

So there will be no runtime issues. May I ask you if you can change
current dynamic libraries setup somehow? I can prepare the patches,
if you are interested.

Regards, Adam

-- 
Adam Tkac, Red Hat, Inc.
___
bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users


Re: Bind and blacklist IP file

2010-10-11 Thread Lyle Giese
Alans wrote:
 Hello,

 Is it possible for bind dns to check the queries, if the returned answer
 is existed in a file that contains blacklisted IPs then block it?

 One more thing, from where we can get/buy updated lists of categorized
 IPs/websites,
 like Gaming, Porn, Social...?

 Thanks,
 Alans



You really need a web proxy with filtering software(like squidGuard) and
some block lists to do this.

http://www.squidguard.org/blacklists.html
___
bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users


Re: Unable to query the nameserver

2010-10-11 Thread Matus UHLAR - fantomas
On 10.10.10 21:03, Doug Barton wrote:
 http://dougbarton.us/DNS/bind-users-FAQ.html#nslookup-evil

nice but I miss there some explanations that were mentioned here, e.g.
it sometimes does not query the server user asks for (iirc)

Something could be reworded. e.g. uses system libraries that could use
/etc/hosts, while host/dig query DNS server directly...

-- 
Matus UHLAR - fantomas, uh...@fantomas.sk ; http://www.fantomas.sk/
Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this address.
Varovanie: na tuto adresu chcem NEDOSTAVAT akukolvek reklamnu postu.
Eagles may soar, but weasels don't get sucked into jet engines. 
___
bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users


Re: Bind and blacklist IP file

2010-10-11 Thread Matus UHLAR - fantomas
On 11.10.10 14:16, Alans wrote:
 Thanks Dave, yes i know about OpenDNS, I'm trying to imlement somehting  
 kind of similar to that in a small scale.
 So i was wondering about Bind dns capabilities and may be third party  
 stuffs that could integrate with bind dns in addition to the ip/website  
 list.

This is NOT something BIND (or any DNS server) should do. Blocking web sites
is business for web proxies, firewalls etc. Doing this stuff at DNS level
could lead to many surprises.

-- 
Matus UHLAR - fantomas, uh...@fantomas.sk ; http://www.fantomas.sk/
Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this address.
Varovanie: na tuto adresu chcem NEDOSTAVAT akukolvek reklamnu postu.
The early bird may get the worm, but the second mouse gets the cheese. 
___
bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users


Re: Bind and blacklist IP file

2010-10-11 Thread Alans

Why not? OpenDNS is a good example i think.
Also, i think as mentioned in Kal's email, DNS RPZ from isc is an 
approach to implement these functionalities at DNS level.


We want to give individuals/customers access to their account to block 
what they want to block, something similar to OpenDNS but in a small scale.


regards,
Alans

On 10/11/2010 07:37 PM, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:

On 11.10.10 14:16, Alans wrote:

Thanks Dave, yes i know about OpenDNS, I'm trying to imlement somehting
kind of similar to that in a small scale.
So i was wondering about Bind dns capabilities and may be third party
stuffs that could integrate with bind dns in addition to the ip/website
list.


This is NOT something BIND (or any DNS server) should do. Blocking web sites
is business for web proxies, firewalls etc. Doing this stuff at DNS level
could lead to many surprises.


___
bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users


Re: Bind and blacklist IP file

2010-10-11 Thread sthaug
  Thanks Dave, yes i know about OpenDNS, I'm trying to imlement somehting  
  kind of similar to that in a small scale.
  So i was wondering about Bind dns capabilities and may be third party  
  stuffs that could integrate with bind dns in addition to the ip/website  
  list.
 
 This is NOT something BIND (or any DNS server) should do. Blocking web sites
 is business for web proxies, firewalls etc. Doing this stuff at DNS level
 could lead to many surprises.

Unfortunately, in some countries you may be required to do so. The
example I know best is, naturally, Norway.

In Norway we have what is basically a government requirement for ISPs
to block child porn domains, using a list supplied by the police. A
decent description of the system, for those of you with a reading
knowledge of Norwegian, is here:

  http://no.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kripos'_barnepornofilter

This blocking is *in theory* voluntary - however, the government has
made it quite clear that unless a sufficiently high number of the
bigger ISPs agree to such blocking, the government will introduce laws
which *require* the ISPs to do it. So much for voluntary.

Of course, all this will do is prevent accidental surfing to domains
on the list. Anybody who *wants* this content can simply run his own
name server - and escape the blocking. So much for effectiveness.

Oh yeah, there are also the usual problems of collateral damage, no
well defined process around the maintenance of the list, etc. The four
criteria proposed in this article:

 http://www.theregister.co.uk/2009/01/13/internet_regulation/

have clearly not been in the minds of the police / politicians that
introduced the system.

Steinar Haug, Nethelp consulting, sth...@nethelp.no


___
bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users


Re: Bind and blacklist IP file

2010-10-11 Thread Nuno Paquete

Hi.

This is NOT something BIND (or any DNS server) should do. Blocking  
web sites
is business for web proxies, firewalls etc. Doing this stuff at DNS  
level

could lead to many surprises.


I definetly agree with this.


In Norway we have what is basically a government requirement for ISPs
to block child porn domains, using a list supplied by the police.


Ok, but you can always browse by IP address and in this case there is  
no DNS server than can stop you from browsing what you want.
If you want to block IP address access you have to use firewall, or if  
you are talking about http traffic and have a proxy, maybe you have to  
block there. That's why I completly agree this should not be blocked  
at DNS level.


Nuno Paquete
___
bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users


Re: Bind and blacklist IP file

2010-10-11 Thread Andrey G. Sergeev (AKA Andris)
Hello  Matus,


Mon, 11 Oct 2010 18:37:43 +0200 Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:

 On 11.10.10 14:16, Alans wrote:
 Thanks Dave, yes i know about OpenDNS, I'm trying to imlement
 somehting kind of similar to that in a small scale.
 So i was wondering about Bind dns capabilities and may be third
 party stuffs that could integrate with bind dns in addition to the
 ip/website list.
 
 This is NOT something BIND (or any DNS server) should do. Blocking
 web sites is business for web proxies, firewalls etc. Doing this
 stuff at DNS level could lead to many surprises.

Strongly agreed. And doing this brainf***ing stuff could lead to an
unpredictable glitches too.

Render unto Caesar the things which are Caesar's, and unto God the
things that are God's (Matthew 22:21).


-- 

Yours sincerely,

Andrey G. Sergeev (AKA Andris) http://www.andris.name/
___
bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users


Re: Bind and blacklist IP file

2010-10-11 Thread Kevin Darcy

On 10/11/2010 2:44 PM, Nuno Paquete wrote:


Ok, but you can always browse by IP address and in this case there is 
no DNS server than can stop you from browsing what you want.
If you want to block IP address access you have to use firewall, or if 
you are talking about http traffic and have a proxy, maybe you have to 
block there. That's why I completly agree this should not be blocked 
at DNS level.




To nitpick: address-block-based filtering*could* be implemented in DNS. 
The same mechanisms that are used to prevent rebinding attacks -- e.g. 
BIND's *deny-answer-addresses* -- could theoretically be repurposed to 
strip addresses in certain banned ranges from DNS responses. Arguably 
this is a misuse/abuse of the feature.





- Kevin


___
bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users

Re: Bind and blacklist IP file

2010-10-11 Thread Andrey G. Sergeev (AKA Andris)
Hello Steinar,


Mon, 11 Oct 2010 19:38:54 +0200 (CEST) sth...@nethelp.no wrote:

 Unfortunately, in some countries you may be required to do so. The
 example I know best is, naturally, Norway.
 
 In Norway we have what is basically a government requirement for ISPs
 to block child porn domains, using a list supplied by the police. A
 decent description of the system, for those of you with a reading
 knowledge of Norwegian, is here:
 
 http://no.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kripos'_barnepornofilter

Would you please describe if brief for those who don't read in
Norwegian the methods the major Norwegian ISPs use to block the CP
domains?


-- 

Yours sincerely,

Andrey G. Sergeev (AKA Andris) http://www.andris.name/
___
bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users


Re: Bind and blacklist IP file

2010-10-11 Thread Andrey G. Sergeev (AKA Andris)
Hello Alans,


Mon, 11 Oct 2010 20:07:40 +0300 Alans wrote:

 Why not? OpenDNS is a good example i think.

Good example? Was it a joke? Do the traceroute on IP addresses of the
two OpenDNS resolvers and you'll find that they both are behind the
same router. Do you still trust the OpenDNS people who advertise their
service as reliable?

P.S. Please don't top-post - this breaks the logic of the discussion
thread. Thank you.

 regards,
 Alans
 
 On 10/11/2010 07:37 PM, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
 On 11.10.10 14:16, Alans wrote:
 Thanks Dave, yes i know about OpenDNS, I'm trying to imlement
 somehting kind of similar to that in a small scale.
 So i was wondering about Bind dns capabilities and may be third
 party stuffs that could integrate with bind dns in addition to the
 ip/website list.

 This is NOT something BIND (or any DNS server) should do. Blocking
 web sites is business for web proxies, firewalls etc. Doing this
 stuff at DNS level could lead to many surprises.


-- 

Yours sincerely,

Andrey G. Sergeev (AKA Andris) http://www.andris.name/
___
bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users


Re: AXFR partially timed out

2010-10-11 Thread Beat Jucker
 I have a very strange problem with AXFR. We are using a master and a
 secondary DNS Server with an internal and an external view. Depending
 on the source address the secondary server will get the internal or
 external view for zone transfer.
 
 Everything is working correct so far except only one specific zone file
 won't get transferred. In the external view there are about 70 zones
 defined. Every zone will get transferred except one and only one won't.
 Therefor there can't be a problem with the firewall.
 
 Then I scaled down the seconday DNS server to just about 2 zones and
 again: this specific zone file won't get transfered even the master
 said AXFR started and AXFR ended for this particular zone. On
 the secondary server I'll get giving up: timed out.

 Is the problem zone larger than the ones that are not a problem?  If so 
 it may be a MTU problem, or even a firewall that does things differently 
 based on packet sizes.

Indeed the trouble zone is about double the size of other zones. 
Both DNS servers are Solaris boxes and comunicate by plain TCP (no VPN).
How can I check for MTU problem and how can I influence it?

When I ask for the zone by dig utility everything is ok but not
when the zone get requested by named ... head scraping ...

Thanks a lot
-- Beat

___
bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users


Re: Bind and blacklist IP file

2010-10-11 Thread David Miller

 On 10/11/2010 3:26 PM, Andrey G. Sergeev (AKA Andris) wrote:

Hello Alans,


Mon, 11 Oct 2010 20:07:40 +0300 Alans wrote:


Why not? OpenDNS is a good example i think.

Good example? Was it a joke? Do the traceroute on IP addresses of the
two OpenDNS resolvers and you'll find that they both are behind the
same router. Do you still trust the OpenDNS people who advertise their
service as reliable?


You are kidding right?  ...or was this post a joke?

OpenDNS is Anycast - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anycast

Here is an DNS Stuff Vector Trace for 208.67.222.222 (one of OpenDNS' 
resolvers):
  
http://www.dnsstuff.com/tools/vectortrace?ip=208.67.222.222token=26314c5ba0c8ae4e2c32430c19d55018


Note that end points are very local to the widely spread start points.

From any one location an IP Anycast service will appear to be very 
local.  That is the point.



P.S. Please don't top-post - this breaks the logic of the discussion
thread. Thank you.


regards,
Alans

On 10/11/2010 07:37 PM, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:

On 11.10.10 14:16, Alans wrote:

Thanks Dave, yes i know about OpenDNS, I'm trying to imlement
somehting kind of similar to that in a small scale.
So i was wondering about Bind dns capabilities and may be third
party stuffs that could integrate with bind dns in addition to the
ip/website list.

This is NOT something BIND (or any DNS server) should do. Blocking
web sites is business for web proxies, firewalls etc. Doing this
stuff at DNS level could lead to many surprises.



--
-___
David Miller
Tiggee LLC
dmil...@tiggee.com

___
bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users