Re: Unable to transfer IPv4 reverse zone

2013-12-20 Thread Cathy Almond
On 19/12/2013 23:32, Daniel Lintott wrote:
 I have now tried recreating the zone file on the master, removed and
 re-added the configuration for the zone on both master and slave, yet
 still I am unable to transfer the zone.
 
 I have also added the following logging to the master server:
 
 logging {
   channel xfer {
   file /var/log/named/xfer.log;
   print-category yes;
   print-severity yes;
   print-time yes;
   };
   category xfer-out {
   xfer;
   };
   };
 
 But this fails to log anything, despite transfers taking place. I've
 checked the permissions on the log and it is writeable by the user which
 bind is running under.
 
 As yet... I'm no closer in working this one out.

Noting this in the master zone:
 allow-transfer {
 192.168.5.2;
 };

Check that the slave actually is using that source address for the TCP
transfer (which I grant would be odd to be different, if your other
zones transfer OK).

Do you have the same ACL on your other zones that transfer OK?

And depending on the 'big' configuration - this might also be relevant:
https://kb.isc.org/article/AA-00904/47/Why-is-my-slave-server-trying-sometimes-to-use-a-different-source-IP-address-for-zone-transfers.html

---

If still unresolved, I think I'd be at the point of doing a network
packet trace on this one to find out which end is dropping it.  The
earlier logging messages suggest that the TCP connection for the
transfer did establish (or start to establish - it may not yet have been
'connected' all the way to the named server).

Trace at both ends simultaneously, so that you get both sides of the
'story'.  And also trace a good transfer between master and slave for
comparison purposes.

---

It shouldn't be relevant to the problem in-hand, but are you missing
this record from your reverse zone (I didn't see it in the ANY query
result):

2.5.168.192.in-addr.arpa. IN  PTR server2.internal.serverb.co.uk.

Cathy

___
Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe 
from this list

bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users


Re: Unable to transfer IPv4 reverse zone

2013-12-20 Thread Daniel Lintott
On 20/12/13 09:16, Cathy Almond wrote:
 Noting this in the master zone:
 allow-transfer {
 192.168.5.2;
 };
 
 Check that the slave actually is using that source address for the TCP
 transfer (which I grant would be odd to be different, if your other
 zones transfer OK).
 

The slave is using 192.168.5.2 for the TCP transfer, to be sure I have
set the transfer source and confirmed this with a packet trace.

 Do you have the same ACL on your other zones that transfer OK?
 
 And depending on the 'big' configuration - this might also be relevant:
 https://kb.isc.org/article/AA-00904/47/Why-is-my-slave-server-trying-sometimes-to-use-a-different-source-IP-address-for-zone-transfers.html
 

All of the zones have identical ACL's as above.

 ---
 
 If still unresolved, I think I'd be at the point of doing a network
 packet trace on this one to find out which end is dropping it.  The
 earlier logging messages suggest that the TCP connection for the
 transfer did establish (or start to establish - it may not yet have been
 'connected' all the way to the named server).
 
 Trace at both ends simultaneously, so that you get both sides of the
 'story'.  And also trace a good transfer between master and slave for
 comparison purposes.
 

Looking at a packet trace, I can see the TCP session establish, the AXFR
request is sent to the master which responds with 'SERVFAIL'

Pkt 160: Standard query 0x3a9c  AXFR 5.168.192.in-addr.arpa

Pkt 173: Standard query response 0x3a9c Server failure

As a thought, I have tried running the AXFR on the master server, which
also fails so it would seem the problem lies on the master server.

[root@server1 ~]# dig 5.168.192.in-addr.arpa @127.0.0.1 AXFR

;  DiG 9.9.4-P1  5.168.192.in-addr.arpa @127.0.0.1 AXFR
;; global options: +cmd
; Transfer failed.

 ---
 
 It shouldn't be relevant to the problem in-hand, but are you missing
 this record from your reverse zone (I didn't see it in the ANY query
 result):
 
 2.5.168.192.in-addr.arpa. IN  PTR server2.internal.serverb.co.uk.
 

The record does appear to to be in the zone.

Regards

Daniel
___
Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe 
from this list

bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users


Re: Unable to transfer IPv4 reverse zone

2013-12-20 Thread Matus UHLAR - fantomas

On 19.12.13 19:27, Daniel Lintott wrote:

The following is logged on the slave:
Dec 19 17:51:48 server2 named[7866]: transfer of
'5.168.192.in-addr.arpa/IN' from 192.168.5.1#53: connected using
192.168.5.2#47108

Dec 19 17:51:48 server2 named[7866]: transfer of
'5.168.192.in-addr.arpa/IN' from 192.168.5.1#53: failed while receiving
responses: SERVFAIL

Dec 19 17:51:48 server2 named[7866]: transfer of
'5.168.192.in-addr.arpa/IN' from 192.168.5.1#53: Transfer completed: 0
messages, 0 records, 0 bytes, 0.001 secs (0 bytes/sec)



what's in logs on master?
--
Matus UHLAR - fantomas, uh...@fantomas.sk ; http://www.fantomas.sk/
Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this address.
Varovanie: na tuto adresu chcem NEDOSTAVAT akukolvek reklamnu postu.
WinError #98652: Operation completed successfully.
___
Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe 
from this list

bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users


Re: Unable to transfer IPv4 reverse zone

2013-12-20 Thread Daniel Lintott
On 20/12/13 11:12, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
 On 19.12.13 19:27, Daniel Lintott wrote:
 The following is logged on the slave:
 Dec 19 17:51:48 server2 named[7866]: transfer of
 '5.168.192.in-addr.arpa/IN' from 192.168.5.1#53: connected using
 192.168.5.2#47108

 Dec 19 17:51:48 server2 named[7866]: transfer of
 '5.168.192.in-addr.arpa/IN' from 192.168.5.1#53: failed while receiving
 responses: SERVFAIL

 Dec 19 17:51:48 server2 named[7866]: transfer of
 '5.168.192.in-addr.arpa/IN' from 192.168.5.1#53: Transfer completed: 0
 messages, 0 records, 0 bytes, 0.001 secs (0 bytes/sec)
 
 
 what's in logs on master?

Nothing seems to be logged for any transfers on the master... even with
the following logging statement added

logging {
channel xfer {
file /var/log/named/xfer.log;
print-category yes;
print-severity yes;
print-time yes;
};
category xfer-out {
xfer;
};
};
___
Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe 
from this list

bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users


Re: Unable to transfer IPv4 reverse zone

2013-12-20 Thread Matus UHLAR - fantomas

what's in logs on master?


On 20.12.13 11:21, Daniel Lintott wrote:

Nothing seems to be logged for any transfers on the master... even with
the following logging statement added

logging {
channel xfer {
file /var/log/named/xfer.log;
print-category yes;
print-severity yes;
print-time yes;
};
category xfer-out {
xfer;
};
};


that's why I prefer logging everything somewhere...
maybe it's in other category...

--
Matus UHLAR - fantomas, uh...@fantomas.sk ; http://www.fantomas.sk/
Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this address.
Varovanie: na tuto adresu chcem NEDOSTAVAT akukolvek reklamnu postu.
Due to unexpected conditions Windows 2000 will be released
in first quarter of year 1901
___
Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe 
from this list

bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users


Re: Unable to transfer IPv4 reverse zone

2013-12-20 Thread Daniel Lintott
On 20/12/13 11:40, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
 what's in logs on master?
 
 On 20.12.13 11:21, Daniel Lintott wrote:
 Nothing seems to be logged for any transfers on the master... even with
 the following logging statement added

 logging {
 channel xfer {
 file /var/log/named/xfer.log;
 print-category yes;
 print-severity yes;
 print-time yes;
 };
 category xfer-out {
 xfer;
 };
 };
 
 that's why I prefer logging everything somewhere...
 maybe it's in other category...
 

Even logging every category each to separate files, doesn't seem to
yield anything.

But... as a way of eliminating the various components, I have setup 2
master zones on the second server (server2).

These both transfer fine to the first server (server1)... and when I add
the logging clause for xfer-out it generates logs.

Which leads to believe that maybe the build of 9.9.4-P1 on server1,
might be at fault. I think I will try and rebuild bind as there seems to
be several issues... that don't exist on the other server, which has an
identical OS.

Regards

Daniel
___
Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe 
from this list

bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users


FW: missing ‘additional section’

2013-12-20 Thread houguanghua
This topic was disscused in 2009. But I don't know the final decision. 
Please refer following site:
http://t4605.network-dns-bind9-dlz.dnstalk.us/missing-additional-section-t4605.html
 
From: houguang...@hotmail.com
To: sjc...@gmail.com
CC: bind-users@lists.isc.org
Subject: RE: missing ‘additional section’
Date: Thu, 19 Dec 2013 14:34:11 +




Dear Steve,
 
In my first dig, no matter that recursion was enabled or not, 'addtional 
section' was returned. In my second dig, no matter that recursion was enabled 
or not, 'addtional section' was not returned.
What's the different between the two times of dig is as follows:
 --the first server is bind9.8.6 with dlz not enabled
 --the seond server is bind9.8.6 with dlz enabled (mysql)
Both servers are  authoritative servers, not caching servers.
 
Now I want to deploy serveral DNS servers using bind DLZ-mysql, and I want to 
return additioal sections to internet users in one dns request.
 
One of my view is as follows:
 view view_ctcbeijing {
match-clients {CTC_Beijing; };
recursion   no;
allow-recursion { none; };
allow-transfer  {none;};dlz Mysql zone {
 database  mysql
  {host=127.0.0.1 dbname=cdn ssl=false port=3306 user=cdn pass=cdn }
  {select zone from dns_records where zone = '$zone$' and view='CTCBeijing' 
limit 1}
  {select ttl, type, mx_priority, case when lower(type)='txt' then concat('\', 
data, '\') when lower(type) = 'soa' then concat_ws(' ', data, resp_person, 
serial, refresh, retry, expire, minimum) else data end as mydata from 
dns_records where zone = '$zone$' and host = '$record$' and (view='CTCBeijing' 
or view='SOA')}
  {}
  {select ttl, type, host, mx_priority, case when lower(type)='txt' then 
concat('\', data, '\') else data end as mydata, resp_person, serial, refresh, 
retry, expire, minimum from dns_records where zone = '$zone$' and 
view='CTCBeijing'}
  {select zone from xfr_table where zone = '$zone$' and client = '$client$' and 
view='CTCBeijing' limit 1}
  {update data_count set count = count + 1 where zone ='$zone$' and 
view='CTCBeijing'};
};
}; All SOA and NS type of records are in the DB is under SOA view.  All 
A/MX//CNAME type of records are in CTCBeijing view. The database script is 
as follows:
 
#SOA record
INSERT INTO dns_records (zone, host, type, data, ttl, view, mx_priority, 
refresh, retry, expire, minimum, serial, resp_person, primary_ns, data_count) 
VALUES
 
('ctyun.cn', '@', 'SOA', 'ns.ctyun.cn.', 3600, 'SOA', NULL, 3600, 3600, 86400, 
10, 2008082700, 'root.ctyun.cn.', 'ns1.ctyun.cn.', 0);
 
# NS
 
INSERT INTO dns_records (zone, host, type, data, ttl, view, mx_priority, 
refresh, retry, expire, minimum, serial, resp_person,
 
primary_ns, data_count) VALUES
 
('ctyun.cn', '@', 'NS', 'ns1.ctyun.cn.', 3600, 'SOA', NULL, 3600, 3600, 86400, 
3600, 2008082700, 'root.ctyun.cn.', 'ns1.ctyun.cn.', 0);
INSERT INTO dns_records (zone, host, type, data, ttl, view, mx_priority, 
refresh, retry, expire, minimum, serial, resp_person,
primary_ns, data_count) VALUES
('ctyun.cn', '@', 'NS', 'ns2.ctyun.cn.', 3600, 'SOA', NULL, 3600, 3600, 86400, 
3600, 2008082700, 'root.ctyun.cn.', 'ns1.ctyun.cn.', 0); 
# A record
INSERT INTO dns_records (zone,host,type,DATA,view) VALUES ('ctyun.cn', 'ns1', 
'A', '124.126.253.202','SOA');
INSERT INTO dns_records (zone,host,type,DATA,view) VALUES ('ctyun.cn', 'ns2', 
'A', '124.126.253.203','SOA');
INSERT INTO dns_records (zone,host,type,DATA,view)VALUES ('ctyun.cn', 'www', 
'A', '211.162.106.1','CTCBeijing');
INSERT INTO dns_records (zone,host,type,DATA,view)VALUES ('ctyun.cn', 'www', 
'A', '211.162.106.2','CTCBeijing');

Regards,
Guanghua   
 
 Date: Thu, 19 Dec 2013 03:07:44 +
 Subject: Re: missing ‘additional section’
 From: sjc...@gmail.com
 To: houguang...@hotmail.com
 CC: bind-users@lists.isc.org
 
 On 19 December 2013 00:48, houguanghua houguang...@hotmail.com wrote:
  If DLG isn't enabled (bind9+view + zone file , no DB is used), the
  additional section is right.  Maybe it's a bug of Bind DLG.
 
 What is DLG?
 
  What I wanted is as follows :
  $ dig @10.3.103.177 www.ctyun.cn
  ;  DiG 9.6-ESV-R10-P1  @10.3.103.177 www.ctyun.cn
 
  ; (1 server found)
  ;; global options: +cmd
  ;; Got answer:
  ;; -HEADER- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 30600
  ;; flags: qr aa rd; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 2, AUTHORITY: 2, ADDITIONAL: 2
  ;; WARNING: recursion requested but not available
  ;; QUESTION SECTION:
  ;www.ctyun.cn.  IN  A
  ;; ANSWER SECTION:
  www.ctyun.cn.   3600IN  A   211.162.106.2
  www.ctyun.cn.   3600IN  A   211.162.106.1
  ;; AUTHORITY SECTION:
  ctyun.cn.   3600IN  NS  ns1.ctyun.cn.
  ctyun.cn.   3600IN  NS  ns2.ctyun.cn.
  ;; ADDITIONAL SECTION:
  ns1.ctyun.cn.   3600IN  A   211.16.106.251
  ns2.ctyun.cn.   3600IN  A   211.16.106.252
 
  ;; Query time: 137 msec
  ;; SERVER: 10.3.103.177#53(10.3.103.177)
  

Re: FW: missing ‘additional section’

2013-12-20 Thread Steven Carr
On 20 December 2013 14:18, houguanghua houguang...@hotmail.com wrote:
 This topic was disscused in 2009. But I don't know the final decision.
 Please refer following site:
 http://t4605.network-dns-bind9-dlz.dnstalk.us/missing-additional-section-t4605.html

Looks like it is potentially a bug if you want to call it that,
since it's to do with DLZ it's probably best taking it up with the
team that produce that code...

http://bind-dlz.sourceforge.net/mailing_list.html

Steve
___
Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe 
from this list

bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users


Adding DS records

2013-12-20 Thread Thomas Schulz
Has anyone been able to get Network Solutions to add DS records for
their domain? I am trying to get DS records added for my domain and
so far it looks like Network Solutions can not do that.

Tom Schulz
Applied Dynamics Intl.
sch...@adi.com
___
Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe 
from this list

bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users


Re: Adding DS records

2013-12-20 Thread /dev/rob0
On Fri, Dec 20, 2013 at 10:04:59AM -0500, Thomas Schulz wrote:
 Has anyone been able to get Network Solutions to add DS records
 for their domain? I am trying to get DS records added for my
 domain and so far it looks like Network Solutions can not do that.

The last time this was asked here was in August:

https://lists.isc.org/pipermail/bind-users/2013-August/091340.html

If I was a NetSol customer, I would ask them, Why not?
-- 
  http://rob0.nodns4.us/
  Offlist GMX mail is seen only if /dev/rob0 is in the Subject:
___
Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe 
from this list

bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users


Re: Adding DS records

2013-12-20 Thread Mike Hoskins (michoski)
-Original Message-
From: Warren Kumari war...@kumari.net
Date: Friday, December 20, 2013 12:15 PM
To: bind-users@lists.isc.org bind-users@lists.isc.org
Subject: Re: Adding DS records

On Dec 20, 2013, at 10:38 AM, /dev/rob0 r...@gmx.co.uk wrote:

 On Fri, Dec 20, 2013 at 10:04:59AM -0500, Thomas Schulz wrote:
 Has anyone been able to get Network Solutions to add DS records
 for their domain? I am trying to get DS records added for my
 domain and so far it looks like Network Solutions can not do that.
 
 The last time this was asked here was in August:
 
 https://lists.isc.org/pipermail/bind-users/2013-August/091340.html
 
 If I was a NetSol customer, I would ask them, Why not?²

And if I were a NetSol customer, I would ask myself, ³Why?²

If I were a capitalist, I'd vote with my wallet and go somewhere with the
features I want.

___
Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe 
from this list

bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users


Re: Adding DS records

2013-12-20 Thread Thomas Schulz
  If I was a NetSol customer, I would ask them, Why not?
 
 And if I were a NetSol customer, I would ask myself, Why?
 
 If I were a capitalist, I'd vote with my wallet and go somewhere with the
 features I want.

Well, we started with them back when they were the only company registering
domain names. And up to now there were no problems (other than perhaps price).

Any recomendations for another company for a  .com domain in the US?
I suppose that I could always use the DLV, but I would rather not.

Tom Schulz
Applied Dynamics Intl.
sch...@adi.com
___
Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe 
from this list

bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users


Re: Adding DS records

2013-12-20 Thread pgndev
 Any recomendations for another company for a  .com domain in the US

Gandi.net

Great support, including DNSSEC:

http://wiki.gandi.net/en/domains/dnssec
http://doc.rpc.gandi.net/domain/reference.html


On Fri, Dec 20, 2013 at 9:58 AM, Thomas Schulz sch...@adi.com wrote:
  If I was a NetSol customer, I would ask them, Why not?
 
 And if I were a NetSol customer, I would ask myself, Why?

 If I were a capitalist, I'd vote with my wallet and go somewhere with the
 features I want.

 Well, we started with them back when they were the only company registering
 domain names. And up to now there were no problems (other than perhaps price).

 Any recomendations for another company for a  .com domain in the US?
 I suppose that I could always use the DLV, but I would rather not.

 Tom Schulz
 Applied Dynamics Intl.
 sch...@adi.com
 ___
 Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe 
 from this list

 bind-users mailing list
 bind-users@lists.isc.org
 https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
___
Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe 
from this list

bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users


RE: Adding DS records

2013-12-20 Thread Lightner, Jeff
FYI:  web.com recently bought NetSol and at least one other Registrar that 
escapes me at the moment.   It might be worthwhile to see if any of their 
companies do this as you might have an easier time transferring and avoid some 
of the common games Registrars play to prevent it.

I heartily recommend that you NOT go to GoDaddy.Once they have your domain 
they play all sorts of games to keep it.

On that subject.  If you DO decided to transfer domains from one registrar to 
another be sure to do the following at the old Registrar BEFORE requesting the 
transfer at the new one:
1)  Turn off domain lock - most Registrars have this enabled by default now.
2)   Turn off private registration if enabled.
3)   Insure the administrative contact email is one you can send email to them 
from and can receive emails from them.
4)   Obtain the transfer authorization code.   Most Registrar web sites have 
transfer buttons that are easy to find but these are for transferring domains 
TO them rather than AWAY.  Usually you have to do some research on their sites 
to find how to generate the code.

Jeffrey C. Lightner
Sr. UNIX Administrator

DS Waters of America, Inc.
5660 New Northside Drive NW
Suite 250
Atlanta, GA  30328






-Original Message-
From: bind-users-bounces+jlightner=water@lists.isc.org 
[mailto:bind-users-bounces+jlightner=water@lists.isc.org] On Behalf Of 
Thomas Schulz
Sent: Friday, December 20, 2013 12:59 PM
To: bind-users@lists.isc.org
Subject: Re: Adding DS records

  If I was a NetSol customer, I would ask them, Why not?
 
 And if I were a NetSol customer, I would ask myself, Why?

 If I were a capitalist, I'd vote with my wallet and go somewhere with
 the features I want.

Well, we started with them back when they were the only company registering 
domain names. And up to now there were no problems (other than perhaps price).

Any recomendations for another company for a  .com domain in the US?
I suppose that I could always use the DLV, but I would rather not.

Tom Schulz
Applied Dynamics Intl.
sch...@adi.com
___
Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe 
from this list

bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users




Athena®, Created for the Cause(tm)
Making a Difference in the Fight Against Breast Cancer

-
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail may contain privileged or confidential 
information and is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s). If you are 
not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, distribution, or use of 
the contents of this information is prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have 
received this electronic transmission in error, please reply immediately to the 
sender that you have received the message in error, and delete it. Thank you.
--

___
Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe 
from this list

bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users


Re: Adding DS records

2013-12-20 Thread David Forrest

On Fri, 20 Dec 2013, Steven Carr wrote:


On 20 December 2013 18:10, pgndev pgnet@gmail.com wrote:

Gandi.net
Great support, including DNSSEC:


Gandi only support DNSSEC if you host the DNS elsewhere, their DNS
servers do not support DNSSEC.

Steve

gandi.net +1

I transferred from NS to Gandhi in December 1998. I don't know about their 
hosting of primary DNS but they do host a secondary of mine and it seems 
to resolve there with an aa flag:


;  DiG 9.10.0a1  -t rrsig @ns6.gandi.net maplepark.com +norec
; (1 server found)
;; global options: +cmd
;; Got answer:
;; -HEADER- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 64272
;; flags: qr aa; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 11, AUTHORITY: 5, ADDITIONAL: 3

;; OPT PSEUDOSECTION:
; EDNS: version: 0, flags:; udp: 4096
;; QUESTION SECTION:
;maplepark.com. IN  RRSIG

;; ANSWER SECTION:
maplepark.com.  7200IN  RRSIG   SPF 5 2 7200 
20140117060102 20131220050102 53247 maplepark.com. 
37jqijnR2J4+HDefTxLqcbUSshnT5HAWlwJ3XL82ty18UDXJ+excwzWU 
6G75VWONF0HIT9Raa8aXeMdhAwgz3KX8+W1WDYs5sIdw59oWSrCw0eWr 
uT7qjAvlOX5csEBit6YTBYG6ddDnO4MCqAULziKNKGQcNMBcsQeUbgax XkM=
maplepark.com.  7200IN  RRSIG   DNSKEY 5 2 7200 
20140117060102 20131220050102 47911 maplepark.com. 
U/kQ9v9+5W58P22QrWrfB9TDXLETHTWfXuqRMHRdKiK0RfXKFPWY6b8I 
4bZaaYwsyJOqK+e+jO9UM53wjZOFrHGC2WAjMldybFY1k5zvjiRu4wY/ 
FOWeS8moA3IJBTEPG5/mMC5KhI7fGNILh8r/oa3+vFVLB2T8UMpvKKc3 
9dfsJEqa0k4AyL5AqqKWF8j9tNlyR2kIXxjHYVw0GP0ef4nWloikiFs9 
vwVCoinqM10lXlRMOSu4px3YhMYFZgiDG4RcPOvZ7uQu7vwhxr7OGG/Y 
A49oLk/gonzcFN5cVTA9sUoWNLiYRhkMavU5z/IskaV1xO4rkZiNcmHB HOwgHw==
maplepark.com.  7200IN  RRSIG   DNSKEY 5 2 7200 
20140117060102 20131220050102 53247 maplepark.com. 
Zi7yCTwBShrjydl4Q0Qg/IKnfdl1Qqj8XJKmYE8+iuoP+VdNDMQ8LPky 
4CJSwqygJkAql6ppm8FYXFwPZsCU3GfWAc90lbAMzGPUtu8XngZcrBJx 
GUeoUndaDOSe2iXd2tws1a2szu6AmE4ku932yvGzlMXR2y4WfH9caAcw fR0=
maplepark.com.  600 IN  RRSIG   NSEC 5 2 600 
20140117060102 20131220050102 53247 maplepark.com. 
qsBEyCopGtmQeQr2+gbpewo646pneaDVnaqnYrx2C4fiwedfiJMIhcx9 
xAxgH0fG7TZ7zEJOUwCITlWkj1lrU4rH0xVNQaQKYez2pcF+CnGJzy7C 
A4SYBRdVXAU/slxu56ahvi7GNS7PHkGJiUVUJh65iEpS2HY3qOdv3CUn jRA=


(...)

--
David Forrest 
St. Louis, Missouri


___
Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe 
from this list

bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users


Re: Adding DS records

2013-12-20 Thread Leonard Mills
AIUI, it is not their name servers (which clearly support the records when 
secondary), it's their hefty customer UI and their support/helpdesk folks that 
would require a non-cheap upgrade.

That said, I have spent most of a decade as a happy customer of register.com, 
which was recently Borged by web.com (of which I know absolutely nothing as a 
customer).

hth,
Len




On Friday, December 20, 2013 11:25 AM, Steven Carr sjc...@gmail.com wrote:
 
On 20 December 2013 18:37, David Forrest d...@maplepark.com wrote:
 gandi.net +1

 I transferred from NS to Gandhi in December 1998. I don't know about their
 hosting of primary DNS but they do host a secondary of mine and it seems to
 resolve there with an aa flag:

Yep, secondary works, but they can't be a DNSSEC primary.


Steve
___
Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe 
from this list

bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users


___
Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe 
from this list

bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users

Re: Adding DS records

2013-12-20 Thread Thomas Schulz
  gandi.net +1
 
  I transferred from NS to Gandhi in December 1998. I don't know about their
  hosting of primary DNS but they do host a secondary of mine and it seems to
  resolve there with an aa flag:
 
 Yep, secondary works, but they can't be a DNSSEC primary.
 
 Steve

We host the primary DNS ourselves with our ISP providing the secondary,
so no problem there. Just to get going, I entered the records using the
DLV. I think that I will get a different registerer early next year, after
the rush of the holidays quiets down. Our contract expires in March, so
this is a reasonable time to do a switch.
Thanks for the advice so far.

Tom Schulz
Applied Dynamics Intl.
sch...@adi.com
___
Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe 
from this list

bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users


Re: Adding DS records

2013-12-20 Thread Carl Byington
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

On Fri, 2013-12-20 at 12:08 -0800, Leonard Mills wrote:
 That said, I have spent most of a decade as a happy customer of
 register.com, which was recently Borged by web.com (of which I know
 absolutely nothing as a customer).

I moved from register.com to gkg.net because register.com was not (at
the time, it may have changed) able to handle DS records, or ipv6 glue.
GKG.net does both.

GKG.net has an api that allows me to script the upload of DS records
when we do KSK key rollovers.


-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2.0.14 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEARECAAYFAlK0uI8ACgkQL6j7milTFsFQCwCbBJEbDbn7uGuw+nEVpHSnIXg+
ZSYAnR76g9qvMohLx7xgNn00o/Zc3531
=xLMV
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


___
Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe 
from this list

bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users


Re: Unable to transfer IPv4 reverse zone

2013-12-20 Thread Cathy Almond
It might be a silly question - but have you checked how many instances
of named you have running on the master (thinking that you might not be
'talking to' the one you think you are)?

Cathy

___
Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe 
from this list

bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users


Re: Adding DS records

2013-12-20 Thread Mark Andrews

In message alpine.lrh.2.03.1312201229270.18...@maplepark.com, David Forrest 
writes:
 On Fri, 20 Dec 2013, Steven Carr wrote:
 
  On 20 December 2013 18:10, pgndev pgnet@gmail.com wrote:
  Gandi.net
  Great support, including DNSSEC:
 
  Gandi only support DNSSEC if you host the DNS elsewhere, their DNS
  servers do not support DNSSEC.
 
  Steve
 gandi.net +1
 
 I transferred from NS to Gandhi in December 1998. I don't know about their 
 hosting of primary DNS but they do host a secondary of mine and it seems 
 to resolve there with an aa flag:
 
 ;  DiG 9.10.0a1  -t rrsig @ns6.gandi.net maplepark.com +norec
 ; (1 server found)
 ;; global options: +cmd
 ;; Got answer:
 ;; -HEADER- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 64272
 ;; flags: qr aa; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 11, AUTHORITY: 5, ADDITIONAL: 3

You don't test for dnssec support by requesting rrsigs.  Nameservers
can return rrsigs without supporting dnssec.

You test for dnssec support by doing a request for something else
with do=1 set (+dnssec) and seeing if rrsig, nsec/nsec3/ds records
are returned along with the rest of the response.

-- 
Mark Andrews, ISC
1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia
PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742 INTERNET: ma...@isc.org
___
Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe 
from this list

bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users


Re: Unable to transfer IPv4 reverse zone

2013-12-20 Thread Daniel Lintott
On 20/12/13 21:59, Cathy Almond wrote:
 It might be a silly question - but have you checked how many instances
 of named you have running on the master (thinking that you might not be
 'talking to' the one you think you are)?
 

There appears to only be one instance, from what I can see

[root@server1 ~]# ps aux | grep named
named29523  0.0  0.9  43536  9608 ?Ss   22:01   0:00
/usr/local/sbin/named -u named

I'm completely out of ideas on this one now, as I've tried the config on
another machine and it worked fine... Something very odd appears to be
going on!

Daniel




___
Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe 
from this list

bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users


New development versions of BIND are available: 9.9.5b1, 9.8.7b1, 9.6-ESV-R11b1

2013-12-20 Thread Michael McNally
New development versions of BIND are now available from
http://www.isc.org/downloads

BIND 9.9.5b1
Release Notes  --  https://kb.isc.org/article/AA-01074

BIND 9.8.7b1
Release Notes  --  https://kb.isc.org/article/AA-01076

BIND 9.6-ESV-R11b1
Release Notes  --  https://kb.isc.org/article/AA-01077
___
Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe 
from this list

bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users


Re: Adding DS records

2013-12-20 Thread Noel Butler
On Fri, 2013-12-20 at 12:58 -0500, Thomas Schulz wrote:


 
 Well, we started with them back when they were the only company registering
 domain names. And up to now there were no problems (other than perhaps price).
 


and their highly unethical business practices, OK my experiences with
them ended ten years ago, but, that's one book I judged by its cover
after
what they did to me.



 Any recomendations for another company for a  .com domain in the US?
 I suppose that I could always use the DLV, but I would rather not.
 
 T


I use cheapdomainregistration.com , reseller from wild west domains,
owned by godaddy, and despite a lot of peoples opinions, I've not in ten
years had one single issue with WWD.

 


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
___
Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe 
from this list

bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users

Re: Unable to transfer IPv4 reverse zone

2013-12-20 Thread Mark Andrews

I think this has got to the point of running named in the
foreground with debugging on the master.

named -g -d 100 usual arguments

This will log everything to stderr.

-- 
Mark Andrews, ISC
1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia
PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742 INTERNET: ma...@isc.org
___
Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe 
from this list

bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users