Re: bind-9.10.0-P2 memory leak?

2014-10-14 Thread Thomas Schulz
 On Mon, 13 Oct 2014, Thomas Schulz wrote:
 
  I restarted bind 9.9.6 with a max-cache-size of 30M. We have 3 views.
  The inital process size was 36 MB. The process grew to 184 MB. It grew
  to 596 MB without the max-cache-size being set and was still growing
  when I restarted it.  BUT when I now do an rndc dumpdb -cache, the
  named_dump.db file contains only the line
  
  ; Dump complete
  
  and nothing else.
  
  So, if you put any limit on the cache size, you will end up with an empty
  cache. I do believe that there is a bug that needs to be fixed.
 
 I wasn't able to reproduce this with 9.9.6 (or a recent master).  Can 
 you please send your configuration (like named-checkconf -px) to 
 bind9-bugs AT isc.org? Thank you.

I sent the configuration, hopefully in a usable format. Note that my
concern is not specifically with the cache. I was investigating the
cache as a possable cause of the unlimited growth in memory usage that
I am seeing. The various experiments that I have done seem to point to
the cache as the cause of the problem. See also the posts with the
subject 'Process size versus cache size'.

To the originator of this thread. Sorry if I have hijacked your thread.
It is possible that the problem you are seeing has a different cause than
the problem I am seeing. Perhaps you should also send in a report to
bind9-bugs AT isc.org.

Tom Schulz
Applied Dynamics Intl.
sch...@adi.com
___
Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe 
from this list

bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users


BIND resource requirements

2014-10-14 Thread Mike Bernhardt
We are currently using 9.8. We have had it on the radar to move to 9.9 but
it's been low priority since 9.8 is still supported for now. But in reading
about all of the alleged issues with 9.10.x as well as possible increased
resource use starting with 9.9.5, I would like to ask a question: We have 2
views and maybe 6 static zones. Is there any significant change in resource
requirements I need to be aware of in moving to 9.9? And are there any known
and intended increased requirements for 9.10 (i.e. not bug-related)?

___
Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe 
from this list

bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users