Re: Why are no notifies send?

2020-10-18 Thread Tony Finch
Axel Rau  wrote:
>
> I can’t see any notifies to 2001:470:100::2 in the logs.
>
> What am I doing wrong?

Normally BIND only logs "sending notifies" without saying anything about
where it is sending them. You need to increase the log level using `rndc
trace 3` (or more than 3) to get the information you want.

Tony.
-- 
f.anthony.n.finchhttp://dotat.at/
Berwick upon Tweed to Whitby: Variable 3 or less, becoming south 4 or 5,
occasionally 6 later. Moderate. Showers, occasional rain later. Good,
occasionally moderate later.___
Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe 
from this list

ISC funds the development of this software with paid support subscriptions. 
Contact us at https://www.isc.org/contact/ for more information.


bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users


Re: forwarders used in order or based on RTT ?

2020-10-18 Thread @lbutlr
On 16 Oct 2020, at 08:36, Bob Harold  wrote:
> That is certainly not obvious.  How do I request improving the manual?
> 
> "in turn" would seem to imply "in order", and the order would logically be 
> the order I listed them.]

I disagree. In turn means one is tried, then if that fails the next is tried. 
There is no implication at all that the order they are tried in is the order 
specified.

It would not hurt anything to say they were tried in turn accords to RTT, but 
as it stands the documentation doesn’t say what you think it says.

Again, "in turn" doesn’t mean "in the order I expect" it simply means one after 
another until all are checked (or one succeeds).


-- 
"Are you pondering what I'm pondering?"
"Wuh, I think so, Brain, but I prefer Space Jelly."

___
Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe 
from this list

ISC funds the development of this software with paid support subscriptions. 
Contact us at https://www.isc.org/contact/ for more information.


bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users


Malformed transaction errors

2020-10-18 Thread @lbutlr
I am getting the following error on one specific domain and I am unsure how to 
fi it. Searching for the error lead to suggestions about not running multiple 
copies of bind on the same machine, but that is not the case here (and it is 
only affecting one domain).

named[652] malformed transaction: example.com.signed.jnl last serial 2018022385 
!= transaction first serial 2018022384
named[652] zone example.com/IN: zone_resigninc:dns_journal_write_transaction -> 
unexpected error
named[652] malformed transaction: example.com.signed.jnl last serial 2018022385 
!= transaction first serial 2018022384
named[652] zone example.com/IN: zone_resigninc:dns_journal_write_transaction -> 
unexpected error

If I put aside the jnl file and stop/start bind the error goes away, but 
eventually it comes back, always for the same domain.

(Setup is DNS primary on on machine and a secondary server on a separate 
machine. Errors are on the primary server.)

-- 
Thunder rolled... It rolled a six.

___
Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe 
from this list

ISC funds the development of this software with paid support subscriptions. 
Contact us at https://www.isc.org/contact/ for more information.


bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users