Re: [SPAM:5.2] Re: Installing 9.7?
On Mon, 2010-02-22 at 08:00 +, Evan Hunt wrote: This completed just fine - but what I can't find is any details on how to physically install it after building. I'm used to things like 'make install', but I don't want to blindly run random commands that may cause carnage. make install is fine. By default it installs into /usr/local. Thanks, that works in a fashion but as you point out installs to: /usr/local/sbin/ - but if I don't want to rewrite the init.d scripts for it I could use it being in /usr/sbin/ I appreciate I can move it all by hand, but I'm guessing I can change where it installs to with 'make install' ? or do I need to do that when I build it? ___ bind-users mailing list bind-users@lists.isc.org https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
Re: Installing 9.7?
On Mon, 2010-02-22 at 08:36 +, Daniel Morgan wrote: On Mon, 2010-02-22 at 08:00 +, Evan Hunt wrote: This completed just fine - but what I can't find is any details on how to physically install it after building. I'm used to things like 'make install', but I don't want to blindly run random commands that may cause carnage. make install is fine. By default it installs into /usr/local. Thanks, that works in a fashion but as you point out installs to: /usr/local/sbin/ - but if I don't want to rewrite the init.d scripts for it I could use it being in /usr/sbin/ I appreciate I can move it all by hand, but I'm guessing I can change where it installs to with 'make install' ? or do I need to do that when I build it? Strike that - found the answer (it's as clear as mud) I think I'll just alter the init.d script for now and see if this version fixes my issue By default, `make install' will install all the files in `/usr/local/bin', `/usr/local/lib' etc. You can specify an installation prefix other than `/usr/local' using `--prefix', for instance `--prefix=$HOME'. For better control, use the options below. Fine tuning of the installation directories: --bindir=DIR user executables [EPREFIX/bin] --sbindir=DIR system admin executables [EPREFIX/sbin] --libexecdir=DIR program executables [EPREFIX/libexec] --sysconfdir=DIR read-only single-machine data [PREFIX/etc] --sharedstatedir=DIR modifiable architecture-independent data [PREFIX/com] --localstatedir=DIRmodifiable single-machine data [PREFIX/var] --libdir=DIR object code libraries [EPREFIX/lib] --includedir=DIR C header files [PREFIX/include] --oldincludedir=DIRC header files for non-gcc [/usr/include] --datarootdir=DIR read-only arch.-independent data root [PREFIX/share] --datadir=DIR read-only architecture-independent data [DATAROOTDIR] --infodir=DIR info documentation [DATAROOTDIR/info] --localedir=DIRlocale-dependent data [DATAROOTDIR/locale] --mandir=DIR man documentation [DATAROOTDIR/man] --docdir=DIR documentation root [DATAROOTDIR/doc/PACKAGE] --htmldir=DIR html documentation [DOCDIR] --dvidir=DIR dvi documentation [DOCDIR] --pdfdir=DIR pdf documentation [DOCDIR] --psdir=DIRps documentation [DOCDIR] ___ bind-users mailing list bind-users@lists.isc.org https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
Re: Duplicating queries??
On Sun, 2010-02-21 at 17:23 -0800, Doug Barton wrote: On 02/19/10 23:07, Daniel Morgan wrote: I have a couple of BIND servers that I have inherited. I'm getting some upstream complaints that one of them is issuing duplicate queries on occasions - probably about a dozen times a day. You didn't mention what version of BIND you're running. I'm guessing that it's an older version from before the time when this bug was fixed. If you're not using an up to date version, upgrade to at least 9.6.1-P3 and see if that solves your problems. hth, Doug Sorry: ;; ANSWER SECTION: VERSION.BIND. 0 CH TXT 9.5.0-P2.1 However, I have an older version on a secondary box 9.5.0-P2 which does not suffer with the problem. I'll look at upgrading, but this will require change management and the headache that goes with it :-( ___ bind-users mailing list bind-users@lists.isc.org https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
Installing 9.7?
This may seem like a retarded question. Following advice to update I've downloaded the 9.7 source and built it as per the readme: ___ bind-users mailing list bind-users@lists.isc.org https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
Re: Duplicating queries??
On Sat, 2010-02-20 at 11:38 -0500, Barry Margolin wrote: In article mailman.486.1266649694.21153.bind-us...@lists.isc.org, Daniel Morgan daniel.mor...@riotm.co.uk wrote: I have a couple of BIND servers that I have inherited. I'm getting some upstream complaints that one of them is issuing duplicate queries on occasions - probably about a dozen times a day. When it happens, sure enough I find this in the logs: named[6905]: 18-Feb-2010 22:31:41.201 client 82.70.24.23#55710: query: 28.214.138.70.itx.munged.org.uk IN TXT + named[6905]: 18-Feb-2010 22:31:42.560 client 82.70.24.23#52806: query: 28.214.138.70.itx.munged.org.uk IN TXT + Here the last query is identical to the first buy made just over a second later. I'm not sure this is an issue with BIND and I suspect that it may be the program (Postfix) that is querying the server firing off occasional duplicate queries? I'm clutching at straws to understand what is going on here - can anyone offer me some advice? Did it get a response to the first query? If not, the second one is simply retrying because it timed out waiting for a response. You know something, that had not crossed my mind. I can't think of any easy way to check this - but looking though all the other logs on the system - right down to the wan link, nothing is out of place. ___ bind-users mailing list bind-users@lists.isc.org https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
Duplicating queries??
I have a couple of BIND servers that I have inherited. I'm getting some upstream complaints that one of them is issuing duplicate queries on occasions - probably about a dozen times a day. When it happens, sure enough I find this in the logs: named[6905]: 18-Feb-2010 22:31:41.201 client 82.70.24.237#55710: query: 28.214.138.70.itx.munged.org.uk IN TXT + named[6905]: 18-Feb-2010 22:31:42.560 client 82.70.24.237#52806: query: 28.214.138.70.itx.munged.org.uk IN TXT + Here the last query is identical to the first buy made just over a second later. I'm not sure this is an issue with BIND and I suspect that it may be the program (Postfix) that is querying the server firing off occasional duplicate queries? I'm clutching at straws to understand what is going on here - can anyone offer me some advice? ___ bind-users mailing list bind-users@lists.isc.org https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
