Re: forwarding zone to another DNS server problem

2014-11-05 Thread Joshua Smith
Kevin,
Thanks for this post.  Its the most succinct description of stub zones
I've ever read.  I've often tried to wrap my head around when to use a
stub and when to use a conditional forwarder and I *think* your
description has cleared that up for me.


On Wed, Nov 05, 2014 at 03:21:00PM +, Darcy Kevin (FCA) wrote:
> My attempt to explain "stub"...
> 
> It's like conditional forwarding, without the recursion. You tell named where 
> the top of the namespace tree is hosted, and it issues *iterative* (= 
> non-recursive) queries for names in that part of the tree. (Unless, of 
> course, you have a definition further down in that namespace that overrides 
> the behavior).
> 
> As someone else pointed out, this raises the requirement that you have 
> *direct* connectivity to the published authoritative nameservers for the top 
> level of the zone, and any other descendant zones (unless, again, you 
> override those parts of the namespace tree with some other definition). In a 
> DMZ environment, you may not have open and clear communication to 
> *everything* that you need, and therefore "stub" might not be a good fit in 
> that case. You might be forced, as a last resort, to use forwarding, in such 
> a scenario.
> 
> Beyond that understanding, there are differences in how named *gets* the 
> apex-NS information for a "stub" zone. The "classic" stub model is to use a 
> similar replication method as slaving, i.e. driven by the 
> REFRESH/RETRY/EXPIRE settings in the SOA of the zone. This will generate 
> periodic refresh traffic in the form of SOA and/or NS queries. With the newer 
> "static-stub" model (which, full disclosure, I've never actually *used*), 
> apparently you just plug the addresses of the auth servers directly into the 
> config, and no "refreshing" is necessary. There are pros and cons, that come 
> to mind, for each of those flavors of "stub".
> 
>   
> - Kevin
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: bind-users-boun...@lists.isc.org 
> [mailto:bind-users-boun...@lists.isc.org] On Behalf Of Tony Finch
> Sent: Tuesday, November 04, 2014 5:10 AM
> To: houguanghua
> Cc: bind-users@lists.isc.org
> Subject: RE: forwarding zone to another DNS server problem
> 
> houguanghua  wrote:
> 
> >  I 'm not familiar with'stub'.  The description of 'stub' is hard to 
> > understand.
> 
> Yes it's a bit weird. Think of it like the root hints but for other zones:
> i.e. a hint zone configuration in a recursive server tells named that instead 
> of using a referral from the parent zone to find the name servers for this 
> zone, use these configured name servers. However the name servers at the 
> zone's apex can override your configuration.
> 
> If you use static-stub instead, your configured name servers override all 
> name servers for the zone that your name server might receive.
> 
> The difference with forwarding zones occurs if there is a delegation point 
> below the zone you have configured. With a fowarding zone, named expects the 
> target name server to do recursion, so the target server will deal with 
> following the referral and resolving the final answer. With a stub zone, 
> named expects to get authoritative answers and referrals to child zones, and 
> it will do its own recursion to resolve the final answer.
> 
> Tony.
> --
> f.anthony.n.finchhttp://dotat.at/ Viking, North North 
> Utsire: Cyclonic, becoming northeasterly 6 to gale 8, occasionally severe 
> gale 9. Moderate or rough, becoming rough or very rough.
> Rain or showers. Good, occasionally poor.
> ___
> Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe 
> from this list
> 
> bind-users mailing list
> bind-users@lists.isc.org
> https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
> ___
> Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe 
> from this list
> 
> bind-users mailing list
> bind-users@lists.isc.org
> https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users

-- 
Joshua Smith
Lead Systems Administrator WVNET
(304)293-5192 x247

___
Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe 
from this list

bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users


Re: Same internal and external zone

2014-02-14 Thread Joshua Smith
Can you not delegate xyz.xyz.example.com to route 53 on your internal name 
server?

--
Josh Smith
KD8HRX

Email/jabber: juice...@gmail.com
Phone: 304.237.9369(c)

Sent from my iPhone. 

> On Feb 14, 2014, at 12:53 PM, Sarath  wrote:
> 
> Hi All,
> 
> I have a situation where the same domain for example xyz.example.com is both 
> internal and external.
> 
> The internal xyz.example.com is on an internal host (private address ) which 
> is the default DNS server for all internal hosts (all hosts use this DNS 
> server in their resolve.conf ) And the external xyz.example.com is on another 
> public ip server (aws route 53 ).
> 
> The problem is i have a hostname for example xyz.xyz.example.com which is on 
> the public DNS server..and my local network hosts cannot
> Resolve that hostname which is on the public DNS server (route 53)
> 
> The reason is because local DNS server is also authoritative for 
> xyz.example.com, and as it does not find xyz.xyz.example.com on the local 
> zone it gives no reply..
> 
> I cannot add the record of xyz.xyz.example.com on my local DNS server (which 
> is bind )because that host is DNS load balanced using route 53 health checks..
> 
> Is there any other solution to get this done in bind, like adding a cname 
> also won't work..
> 
> Please let me know if there is some solution or workaround for this 
> 
> Thanks 
> Sarath
> 
> Powered by BigRock.com
> 
> ___
> Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe 
> from this list
> 
> bind-users mailing list
> bind-users@lists.isc.org
> https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
___
Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe 
from this list

bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users


Re: VMware & Bind

2012-06-05 Thread Joshua Smith
Yes. 

--
Josh Smith
KD8HRX

Email/jabber: juice...@gmail.com
Phone: 304.237.9369(c)

Sent from my iPhone

On Jun 5, 2012, at 12:58 PM, "Manson, John"  wrote:

> Will bind run on VMware?
>  
>  
> John Manson
> CAO/HIR/NI Data-Communications | U.S. House of Representatives | Washington, 
> DC 20515
> Desk: 202-226-4244 | Team: 202-225-5552 | john.man...@mail.house.gov
>  
>  
>  
>  
> ___
> Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe 
> from this list
> 
> bind-users mailing list
> bind-users@lists.isc.org
> https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
___
Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe 
from this list

bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users