Re: VMware Bind

2012-06-05 Thread jcarroll65
Technically VMware is not the OS but the hypervisor that controls other OS's, 
such as Windows or Linux. I've implemented BIND 9 on Solaris 10 x86 running on 
a VMware with no issues.

JC
 Manson wrote: 
 Will bind run on VMware?
 
 
 John Manson
 CAO/HIR/NI Data-Communications | U.S. House of Representatives | Washington, 
 DC 20515
 Desk: 202-226-4244 | Team: 202-225-5552 | john.man...@mail.house.gov
 
 
 
 

___
Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe 
from this list

bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users


Re: dnsquery for Solaris

2010-03-09 Thread jcarroll65
dig was added to Solaris 9. It is not native to Solaris 8 or older.

 Chris Thompson c...@cam.ac.uk wrote: 
 On Mar 9 2010, Sam Wilson wrote:
 
 In article mailman.747.1268158060.21153.bind-us...@lists.isc.org,
  ic.nssip ic.ns...@northwestel.net wrote:
 
  I find it useful to test records cache time.
 
 dig tells you that.  
 
  I'll check on BIND 8 package.
  Thank you for pointing to a Solaris compatible source.
 
 Use dig from a recent BIND package, though you may find it's already 
 there - ours is in /usr/local/bin/dig on our Solaris systems and was 
 installed with BIND 9.  I don't know whether it's there if you use the 
 Solaris-supplied BIND.
 
 Sure it is:
 
 $ ls -l /usr/sbin/dig
 -r-xr-xr-x   1 root bin75208 Jul 29  2008 /usr/sbin/dig
 $ fgrep /usr/sbin/dig /var/sadm/install/contents
 /usr/sbin/dig f none 0555 root bin 75208 48119 121715 SUNWbind
 
 (that's a 9.3.5-P1 dig, from a not very up-to-date Solaris 10 installation,
 but it's been around in Solaris distributions much longer than that).
 
 -- 
 Chris Thompson   University of Cambridge Computing Service,
 Email: c...@ucs.cam.ac.ukNew Museums Site, Cambridge CB2 3QH,
 Phone: +44 1223 334715   United Kingdom.
 ___
 bind-users mailing list
 bind-users@lists.isc.org
 https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users

___
bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users


Summary: Differences between 9.3 and later versions

2010-02-23 Thread jcarroll65
This mailing list rocks. 

Many thanks to Stephane Bortzmeyer and Jay Ford. Both where spot on with 
allow-query. Now BIND 9.7 resolves to the outside.

JC

 jcarrol...@cfl.rr.com wrote: 
 Please do not crucify me.
 
 Due to an security audit I have been given the task of upgrading our BIND 
 from 9.3 to a new version (9.7 is preferred). Using the package from 
 sunfreeware.com (Solaris 10/X86) the upgrade seem to work well. However, 
 whenever someone tries to nslookup (or dig) an external site (i.e. cnn.com) 
 they get REFUSED. If I back down to the 9.3 version all is well. I've tried 
 to find what new security feature is required, but alas I can't seem to get 
 it. What changes affect resolving outside sites?
 
 JC

___
bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users