Re: BIND 9.16.17-snapshot - testers needed - recursive performance
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Hi, I switched to the 9.16.17 release candidate yesterday and so far, it runs well on my 6 very-low traffic dns servers (one of which is also authoritative). Only thing, I noticed, is, that it uses more memory than 9.16.16 on the weakest of my servers (a 32-bit machine running archlinux32): ~14.8% -> ~20.4% (of 256MB total memory) But this could also be due to different load - there is no real long-time monitor set up for this, and I simply took some values right before the change and have been monitoring the memory consumption since then. I cannot really tell, whether the memory consumption is higher on the other machines, as those circle around or below 1% and there's too much noise down there :-D (but "10MB more ram needed" could well be possible, as these other machines all have >=2GB ram). regards, Erich On Tue, 25 May 2021, Ondřej Surý wrote: Hi, we merged a change that substantially reduces a contention between threads and improves the recursive performance in 9.16 branch quite significantly. After the change, the 9.16 branch performance will surpass 9.11 performance in both scenarios - authoritative (already the case, from the very beginning) and recursive (since a version to be released in June). Although, we are quite confident that the new code is correct, we would appreciate if people running different work loads than ours to test the snapshot tarball available from here: https://users.isc.org/~ondrej/bind-9.16.17-pre.tar.xz We would like to hear both success (it’s ok here in the mailing list) and failure stories (please create GitLab issues). Thanks, Ondrej -- Ondřej Surý (He/Him) ond...@isc.org ___ Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe from this list ISC funds the development of this software with paid support subscriptions. Contact us at https://www.isc.org/contact/ for more information. bind-users mailing list bind-users@lists.isc.org https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- iQIzBAEBCAAdFiEE3p92iMrPBP64GmxZCu7JB1Xae1oFAmCvkfcACgkQCu7JB1Xa e1oQ7A/9HLKlZYHrnnNUyirda9rN2dn1sAooGm3EPESNSK264afB09lUHtUPrxZZ RXVKET5pKmyVyxuidm4pyytxG7UbBcw+pR7eW6aBQ84a6P7sEbTm4qQYEbBXkCHx 4VZn5d3rzaFnOdUHiFpSFR2rkD8Xty2X0fR/usYSrA3Qhe+Iu9HEeFzezQnevTYK AiXxFYghiHcTnSVM/tjL16f8iOs7u+QNM/jHncouM2x0AFJ5N3bBvz8SsTVlM8lr A1jxxh37N5/HT/d2vTz6PW4J18A7IaXbc323HUwvYJ/+vxY1s0u3CKhLO2+sctnX PkIIXD3G7jStCP2+HZgLnw3KPGDEU+Nxi79jirZxRI2NFB8wlon69LUd17W+Om3g 0OsHMIsRLblcmyBTdWoa35peeRchS9ktaWPh3TdoDwEBuU3QiYgjJTWFbxJ0lfhI KlFx0TLU6ZgI3vaF4av/7FMvoFn+ouOtha2gu62B13qGgHXVAS1XnVSM2XONmsLJ PaOTAPGpV9+SoC5ENNnyeRtP6wVlclogOO/RSwlNY357feqPSCOlPfuCJp1i9JCJ +G+Xe2dRVeRhJRv7qnUvM8nubV9rpIHYrNJX871Qv7MbFU+U21Zbs/ejptrlXvVO V2S32/TTq2n07Jt05qmmp624gYytGyl+hRj6Jya1iaITfmsbwVs= =HK4f -END PGP SIGNATURE-___ Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe from this list ISC funds the development of this software with paid support subscriptions. Contact us at https://www.isc.org/contact/ for more information. bind-users mailing list bind-users@lists.isc.org https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
Re: BIND 9.16.17-snapshot - testers needed - recursive performance
Hi there, On Wed, 26 May 2021, He/Him wrote: we merged a change that substantially reduces a contention between threads and improves the recursive performance ... We are currently running 9.11.26, and 9.11 has always built with no issues. Debian 9.13 (Stretch). $ aunpack bind-9.16.17-pre.tar.xz $ cd bind-9.16.16 # NB bind-9.16.16 in the tarball, not bind-9.16.17 $ ./configure --prefix=/usr/local --sysconfdir=/etc --with-openssl ... ... configure: error: The pkg-config script could not be found or is too old. $ -- 73, Ged. ___ Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe from this list ISC funds the development of this software with paid support subscriptions. Contact us at https://www.isc.org/contact/ for more information. bind-users mailing list bind-users@lists.isc.org https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
Re: BIND 9.16.17-snapshot - testers needed - recursive performance
Hello, It works just fine to me, so I guess it's a problem on your end? Try using wget instead of firefox, or different browser. On 25/05/2021 16:44, Erich Eckner wrote: On Tue, 25 May 2021, Ondřej Surý wrote: > Hi, Hi Ondrej, > we merged a change that substantially reduces a contention between threads > and improves the recursive performance in 9.16 branch quite significantly. > After the change, the 9.16 branch performance will surpass 9.11 performance > in both scenarios - authoritative (already the case, from the very beginning) > and recursive (since a version to be released in June). > Although, we are quite confident that the new code is correct, we would appreciate > if people running different work loads than ours to test the snapshot tarball available > from here: > https://users.isc.org/~ondrej/bind-9.16.17-pre.tar.xz I tried to pull the tarball from this url, but only got some gitlab page (which firefox refused to show, but insisted to download). Is this my error or did you accidentally push the wrong content? > We would like to hear both success (it’s ok here in the mailing list) and failure stories > (please create GitLab issues). > Thanks, > Ondrej regards, Erich > > ___ > Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe from this list > > ISC funds the development of this software with paid support subscriptions. Contact us at https://www.isc.org/contact/ for more information. > > > bind-users mailing list > bind-users@lists.isc.org > https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users ___ Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe from this list ISC funds the development of this software with paid support subscriptions. Contact us at https://www.isc.org/contact/ for more information. bind-users mailing list bind-users@lists.isc.org https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
Re: BIND 9.16.17-snapshot - testers needed - recursive performance
Hi Erich, it was error on my side, it should be ok now. Ondrej -- Ondřej Surý (He/Him) ond...@isc.org > On 25. 5. 2021, at 16:44, Erich Eckner wrote: > > Signed PGP part > On Tue, 25 May 2021, Ondřej Surý wrote: > > > Hi, > > Hi Ondrej, > > > > > we merged a change that substantially reduces a contention between threads > > and improves the recursive performance in 9.16 branch quite significantly. > > > > After the change, the 9.16 branch performance will surpass 9.11 performance > > in both scenarios - authoritative (already the case, from the very > > beginning) > > and recursive (since a version to be released in June). > > > > Although, we are quite confident that the new code is correct, we would > > appreciate > > if people running different work loads than ours to test the snapshot > > tarball available > > from here: > > > > https://users.isc.org/~ondrej/bind-9.16.17-pre.tar.xz > > I tried to pull the tarball from this url, but only got some gitlab page > (which firefox refused to show, but insisted to download). Is this my > error or did you accidentally push the wrong content? > > > > > We would like to hear both success (it’s ok here in the mailing list) and > > failure stories > > (please create GitLab issues). > > > > Thanks, > > Ondrej > > regards, > Erich > signature.asc Description: Message signed with OpenPGP ___ Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe from this list ISC funds the development of this software with paid support subscriptions. Contact us at https://www.isc.org/contact/ for more information. bind-users mailing list bind-users@lists.isc.org https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
Re: BIND 9.16.17-snapshot - testers needed - recursive performance
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On Tue, 25 May 2021, Ondřej Surý wrote: Hi, Hi Ondrej, we merged a change that substantially reduces a contention between threads and improves the recursive performance in 9.16 branch quite significantly. After the change, the 9.16 branch performance will surpass 9.11 performance in both scenarios - authoritative (already the case, from the very beginning) and recursive (since a version to be released in June). Although, we are quite confident that the new code is correct, we would appreciate if people running different work loads than ours to test the snapshot tarball available from here: https://users.isc.org/~ondrej/bind-9.16.17-pre.tar.xz I tried to pull the tarball from this url, but only got some gitlab page (which firefox refused to show, but insisted to download). Is this my error or did you accidentally push the wrong content? We would like to hear both success (it’s ok here in the mailing list) and failure stories (please create GitLab issues). Thanks, Ondrej regards, Erich -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- iQIzBAEBCAAdFiEE3p92iMrPBP64GmxZCu7JB1Xae1oFAmCtDVkACgkQCu7JB1Xa e1orPA/+NjQN6Z7zhz2aI/XQkf7eK0s810hpuXN5zJiQG7OJwogr+SLOrW6VKLa/ UrfqXIoDU36kNKHQTWTjlOxi2Eh2l/c5W5qWv2I0ZQdLe4pU//5+i+Bxdv8o925r d3nATQeYdi4sz8LZtzI0GTbyIRVCF7rQki1F5PGnk3XteT5zuZYNxTbkqv8/m+Lg VX/bc5KmY5SVZBge4aNk+rI03v1+KMT5zVwVhlgTS3dpgCI7qhtWKyMN686nMfcN 0v/7mRa9qFHklBh7FTLpY5N/vW89NM40IYjehyoXc3QA/IzU7SqKbSPuJjB5tMkK ct4UMX+P7ISAPu82w2vf/86UYdO/GiHWGeisG4322rdydDVh5vaa5jn/a6YVTl5h SdfbqDTevG2n+/T3FOT1/hf4Ryb8WaG2gH4iqHiNeuiM1VNeR40cQZIe0euBVv4H MomQHFQBHzHjP8HIFTkKs3XVX+LtsAIq5AvhXcYkGozPNLz0/+W/8LniV+jFgKzX oR8sRlzNTFwmNHDhRd0AAZyw84ZvAam424DcNYuR1bP5nPXBGY0S1tktfQ7wJD4D 1oWyuu9bKz5wEHIx9GpenAoRfc0feL6LjwnRYc4q0t/hkfbEgOz/jpOEI1UVWfLq O1yJPhSvoR8gW2PMMrNSxGqUtlJ7pbQPvRFPyC7sejBboAfjRQ0= =GN6u -END PGP SIGNATURE-___ Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe from this list ISC funds the development of this software with paid support subscriptions. Contact us at https://www.isc.org/contact/ for more information. bind-users mailing list bind-users@lists.isc.org https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
BIND 9.16.17-snapshot - testers needed - recursive performance
Hi, we merged a change that substantially reduces a contention between threads and improves the recursive performance in 9.16 branch quite significantly. After the change, the 9.16 branch performance will surpass 9.11 performance in both scenarios - authoritative (already the case, from the very beginning) and recursive (since a version to be released in June). Although, we are quite confident that the new code is correct, we would appreciate if people running different work loads than ours to test the snapshot tarball available from here: https://users.isc.org/~ondrej/bind-9.16.17-pre.tar.xz We would like to hear both success (it’s ok here in the mailing list) and failure stories (please create GitLab issues). Thanks, Ondrej -- Ondřej Surý (He/Him) ond...@isc.org ___ Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe from this list ISC funds the development of this software with paid support subscriptions. Contact us at https://www.isc.org/contact/ for more information. bind-users mailing list bind-users@lists.isc.org https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
