Re: RNDC Stats
N. Max Pierson wrote:
>
> Under Incoming Requests it has QUERY's among some other stats. Is this
> the total queries across all zones? If it is, it doesn't seem to add up
> to what the total of each zone added together in the per zone stats.
Hmm, good question. I suspected it might be something to do with REFUSED
queries for zones that you are not authoritative for, but that doesn't add
up for me either, because my server sent a lot more refused responses than
the difference between its overall query count and the zone query
counts...
awk '
/queries received/ {
if (n < 2) { server += $1 }
else { zones += $1 }
n += 1;
}
/REFUSED/ { refused = $1 }
END {
printf "server %d\n", server;
printf "zones %d\n", zones;
printf "difference %d\n", server - zones;
printf "refused %d\n", refused;
}
' named.stats
server 141242445
zones 141221559
difference 20886
refused 364380
Tony.
--
f.anthony.n.finchhttp://dotat.at/
Cape Wrath to Rattray Head including Orkney: Westerly 5 to 7, occasionally
gale 8 at first in north, becoming variable 3 or 4, then cyclonic 5 to 7
later. Slight or moderate in east, moderate or rough, occasionally very rough
in north. Showers then rain. Good, becoming moderate or poor.
___
Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe
from this list
bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
RNDC Stats
Hi List, I am trying to pull some metrics from our bind servers and I don't quite understand what some for the stats in the file really mean. What I am looking for is total queries and then a breakdown of total queries for each zone. Under Incoming Requests it has QUERY's among some other stats. Is this the total queries across all zones? If it is, it doesn't seem to add up to what the total of each zone added together in the per zone stats. Can someone please educate me on this and let me know if I am just reading the file incorrectly? There doesn't seem to be any documentation on the stats file itself. Regards, Max ___ Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe from this list bind-users mailing list bind-users@lists.isc.org https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
rndc stats - referral versus failure
Looking at rndc stats output on an older BIND 9.3 nameserver versus output on a new BIND 9.7 nameserver. It seems that the 9.3 and 9.7 referrals and failures are flipped in rndc stats output. Does that make sense? On the 9.3 nameserver I see a boatload of referrals and almost no failures. On the 9.7 nameserver it's flipped : a boatload of failures and almost no referrals. Named.conf on the 2 nameservers is set up identically. Thanks, Martin Meadows ___ Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe from this list bind-users mailing list bind-users@lists.isc.org https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
Re: rndc stats command
Hi, Thanks for your kind response. sorry for the delay. Currently i make a logic with shell scripts is that i run my statistics.sh by cron via every 1 minute and collect INCOMING QUERY AND CACHE HIT RATIO. CACHE HIT RATIO = (IN COMING QUERY - RECURSION ) / INCOMING QUERY. Let say i run first time : 10.00 AM First i clean named_Stat file and then run rndc stats command so it will write statistics to named_stat file and then i collect incoming query numbers and cache hit ratio. Second time run same logic : 10.01 AM so this time i again get incoming query numbers and hit ratio value and while plotting these by rrdtool, i remove old value ( 10.00 AM ) from current value ( 10.01 AM) and get actual value. same fashion, i run above logic for time frame. Kindly correct me , if i am running wrong logic. when i run rndc stats , it gives me full outpur.can i get only certain output from it by any command or something? My concern is that to find QPS / no. of queries per RR / hit ratio. Best Regards, Ben On Jul 18 2012, Ben wrote: Hi, As per man page and my understanding rndc stats writes a current named statistics into defined file in named.conf so suppose, if i run rndc stats command and then i take required information from named statistics file. And after some time, ( after 5 minutes or approx.) when i do again rndc stats , so that times it provides new statistics.? My understanding is that while running rndc stats , it writes current named statistics to defined file and internally it flush named statistics ( which wrote into file as per named.conf ) And while second time run same command , again it append fresh/new named statistics to defined fiel, is it so? Or is there any interval for rndc / named to generate fresh/new statistics.? Kindly correct me if I am missing something... I think you are missing at least the following: rndc stats *appends* to the statistics file. It doesn't overwrite any previous contents. rndc stats does not reset the internal statistics counters (I take it that was what you meant by flush). They are always accumulative from when named was last started. From two successive set of ststistics written by rndc stats, you can deduce what happened during the interval by taking the difference in the values of corresponding counters, and to deduce rates you divide by the length of the interval which you can deduce from the difference in their timestamps +++ Statistics Dump +++ (1342566900) ... --- Statistics Dump --- (1342566900) ^^ which are in time_t format (seconds since the Unix epoch). [What's annoyingly missing, by the way, is the time when named was in fact started. That's present in the XML on the statistics channel, but not in the file written by rndc stats.] ___ Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe from this list bind-users mailing list bind-users@lists.isc.org https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
rndc stats command
Hi, As per man page and my understanding rndc stats writes a current named statistics into defined file in named.conf so suppose, if i run rndc stats command and then i take required information from named statistics file. And after some time, ( after 5 minutes or approx.) when i do again rndc stats , so that times it provides new statistics.? My understanding is that while running rndc stats , it writes current named statistics to defined file and internally it flush named statistics ( which wrote into file as per named.conf ) And while second time run same command , again it append fresh/new named statistics to defined fiel, is it so? Or is there any interval for rndc / named to generate fresh/new statistics.? Kindly correct me if I am missing something... Regards, Ben ___ Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe from this list bind-users mailing list bind-users@lists.isc.org https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
Re: rndc stats command
On Jul 18 2012, Ben wrote: Hi, As per man page and my understanding rndc stats writes a current named statistics into defined file in named.conf so suppose, if i run rndc stats command and then i take required information from named statistics file. And after some time, ( after 5 minutes or approx.) when i do again rndc stats , so that times it provides new statistics.? My understanding is that while running rndc stats , it writes current named statistics to defined file and internally it flush named statistics ( which wrote into file as per named.conf ) And while second time run same command , again it append fresh/new named statistics to defined fiel, is it so? Or is there any interval for rndc / named to generate fresh/new statistics.? Kindly correct me if I am missing something... I think you are missing at least the following: rndc stats *appends* to the statistics file. It doesn't overwrite any previous contents. rndc stats does not reset the internal statistics counters (I take it that was what you meant by flush). They are always accumulative from when named was last started. From two successive set of ststistics written by rndc stats, you can deduce what happened during the interval by taking the difference in the values of corresponding counters, and to deduce rates you divide by the length of the interval which you can deduce from the difference in their timestamps +++ Statistics Dump +++ (1342566900) ... --- Statistics Dump --- (1342566900) ^^ which are in time_t format (seconds since the Unix epoch). [What's annoyingly missing, by the way, is the time when named was in fact started. That's present in the XML on the statistics channel, but not in the file written by rndc stats.] -- Chris Thompson Email: c...@cam.ac.uk ___ Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe from this list bind-users mailing list bind-users@lists.isc.org https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
Re: Detailed Log Analysis based on rndc stats!!
Sorry, Shiva I have confused you. Mark is absolutely right and I was wrong. Another way is to capture responses with tcpdump or dnscap. 2012/1/30 Mark Andrews ma...@isc.org In message canbtt6nxwb4fqygev4x8_jl+m5ho7wfenirxzg3pgvc-kzc...@mail.gmail.com , Shiva Raman writes: Hi Peter Thanks a lot for your reply. I had enabled query-errors with debug level 2 in my bind logging, now i am able to log all SERVFAIL related error logs in query-errors.log. But i am unable to log the NXDOMAIN error logs . NXDOMAIN is not a error. It is a *normal* response code in a well running system. Asking to log NXDOMAIN is like asking to log every positive answer. Referring to Bind documentation, i enabled delegation-only option(which Logs queries that have returned NXDOMAIN as the result of a delegation-only zone or a delegation-only statement in a hint or stub zone declaration) , but this also not logging the NXDOMAIN errors. Kindly guide me whether any additional parameters to be enabled in query-errors to log NXDOMAIN also. delegation-only does *not* log normal NXDOMAIN responses. It logs answers that are *forced* to NXDOMAIN. Regards Shiva Raman -- Mark Andrews, ISC 1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742 INTERNET: ma...@isc.org -- -- AP ___ Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe from this list bind-users mailing list bind-users@lists.isc.org https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
Re: Detailed Log Analysis based on rndc stats!!
Hi Peter
Thanks a lot for your reply. I had enabled query-errors with debug level 2
in my bind logging, now i am able to log all SERVFAIL related error logs in
query-errors.log. But i am unable to log the NXDOMAIN error logs .
Referring to Bind documentation, i enabled delegation-only option(which
Logs queries that have returned NXDOMAIN as the result of a delegation-only
zone or a delegation-only statement in a hint or stub zone declaration) ,
but this also not logging the NXDOMAIN errors. Kindly guide me whether any
additional parameters to be enabled in query-errors to log NXDOMAIN also.
Regards
Shiva Raman
On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 9:11 PM, Peter Andreev andreev.pe...@gmail.comwrote:
2012/1/17 Shiva Raman raman.shi...@gmail.com
Hi All
i am running Bind version 9.8.1 as an Authoritative Name server. From
the rndc.stats , i observe that there are some query failures happening
in the server. I am trying to get a detailed information of this query
failures, but the current logging options is not allowing me to get a
detailed
report on the reason of failure. I tried enabling detailed logs, but that
is also not providing me which all queries failed with NXDOMAIN ,
SERVFAILetc.
Please find the ouptut of named.stats and Logging options enabled in
named.conf
Output of /chroot/named/conf/named.stats
--
+++ Statistics Dump +++ (1326803941)
++ Incoming Requests ++
75808 QUERY
++ Incoming Queries ++
75786 A
22 PTR
++ Outgoing Queries ++
[View: default]
7374 A
13410 NS
97 PTR
[View: _bind]
++ Name Server Statistics ++
75808 IPv4 requests received
75781 requests with ADNS(0) received
75019 responses sent
75003 responses with ADNS(0) sent
2848 queries resulted in successful answer
72340 queries resulted in authoritative answer
2239 queries resulted in non authoritative answer
440 queries resulted in SERVFAIL
71731 queries resulted in NXDOMAIN
3466 queries caused recursion
789 duplicate queries received
++ Zone Maintenance Statistics ++
++ Resolver Statistics ++
[Common]
[View: default]
20881 IPv4 queries sent
5283 IPv4 responses received
111 NXDOMAIN received
2533 SERVFAIL received
16195 query retries
15598 query timeouts
450 IPv4 NS address fetches
6 IPv4 NS address fetch failed
4226 queries with RTT 10ms
17 queries with RTT 10-100ms
869 queries with RTT 100-500ms
82 queries with RTT 500-800ms
37 queries with RTT 800-1600ms
52 queries with RTT 1600ms
[View: _bind]
++ Cache DB RRsets ++
[View: default]
72 A
24 NS
5 CNAME
5 NXDOMAIN
[View: _bind (Cache: _bind)]
++ Socket I/O Statistics ++
20886 UDP/IPv4 sockets opened
4 TCP/IPv4 sockets opened
20883 UDP/IPv4 sockets closed
3910 TCP/IPv4 sockets closed
2 UDP/IPv4 socket bind failures
20881 UDP/IPv4 connections established
3911 TCP/IPv4 connections accepted
++ Per Zone Query Statistics ++
--- Statistics Dump --- (1326803941)
Logging options in /etc/named.conf
// Logging options
logging {
// logging option for named process
channel default_debug {
file /logs/named.log versions 10 size 500m;
print-time yes;
print-category yes;
severity dynamic;
};
channel queries { // logging option for queries to
named
file /logs/query.log versions 20 size 500m;
print-time yes;
print-category yes;
severity dynamic;
};
category default { default_debug; };
category queries { null; }; // comment this line to log queries
category queries { queries; };// uncomment this to log queries
category config { default_debug; };
category security { default_debug; };
category network { default_debug; };
category lame-servers { null; };
category general { null; };
category edns-disabled { null; };
};
---
Kindly let me know the procedure to follow/options to enabled in logs to
get a detailed report of queries w.r.to the following lines.
440 queries resulted in SERVFAIL
71731
Re: Detailed Log Analysis based on rndc stats!!
In message canbtt6nxwb4fqygev4x8_jl+m5ho7wfenirxzg3pgvc-kzc...@mail.gmail.com , Shiva Raman writes: Hi Peter Thanks a lot for your reply. I had enabled query-errors with debug level 2 in my bind logging, now i am able to log all SERVFAIL related error logs in query-errors.log. But i am unable to log the NXDOMAIN error logs . NXDOMAIN is not a error. It is a *normal* response code in a well running system. Asking to log NXDOMAIN is like asking to log every positive answer. Referring to Bind documentation, i enabled delegation-only option(which Logs queries that have returned NXDOMAIN as the result of a delegation-only zone or a delegation-only statement in a hint or stub zone declaration) , but this also not logging the NXDOMAIN errors. Kindly guide me whether any additional parameters to be enabled in query-errors to log NXDOMAIN also. delegation-only does *not* log normal NXDOMAIN responses. It logs answers that are *forced* to NXDOMAIN. Regards Shiva Raman -- Mark Andrews, ISC 1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742 INTERNET: ma...@isc.org ___ Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe from this list bind-users mailing list bind-users@lists.isc.org https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
RE: rndc stats - 9.5.0-p2
As you see below the files are dated 15 august, we upgraded our 2 server in august and 2 in november, could it be first 2 servers have an early version of p2 and things are changed after that time in the stats. Because all the file sizes are different compaped to newest servers. #which named /usr/local/sbin/named /data/log/named #ls -la /usr/local/sbin/ total 53894 drwxr-xr-x 2 root other512 Feb 17 14:52 . drwxr-xr-x 13 root other512 Nov 21 14:02 .. -rwxr-xr-x 1 root other1199932 Aug 15 2008 dnssec-keygen -rwxr-xr-x 1 root other3675504 Aug 15 2008 dnssec-signzone -rwxr-xr-x 2 root other5134128 Aug 15 2008 lwresd -rwxr-xr-x 2 root other5134128 Aug 15 2008 named -rwxr-xr-x 1 root other3816336 Aug 15 2008 named-checkconf -rwxr-xr-x 1 root other3624412 Aug 15 2008 named-checkzone lrwxrwxrwx 1 root other 15 Aug 15 2008 named-compilezone - named-checkzone -rwxr-xr-x 1 root other 847676 Aug 15 2008 rndc -rwxr-xr-x 1 root other1136800 Aug 15 2008 rndc-confgen -rwxr-xr-x 1 root other2917848 Feb 17 14:52 rndcnew01 -Original Message- From: Jeremy C. Reed [mailto:jeremy_r...@isc.org] Sent: Tuesday, February 17, 2009 4:03 PM To: Cihan Subasi (Garanti Teknoloji) Cc: bind-users@lists.isc.org Subject: RE: rndc stats - 9.5.0-p2 Make sure you are really talking to the correct named. Maybe a you have a rndc.conf file. ___ bind-users mailing list bind-users@lists.isc.org https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
RE: rndc stats - 9.5.0-p2
On Wed, 18 Feb 2009, Cihan Subasi (Garanti Teknoloji) wrote: As you see below the files are dated 15 august, we upgraded our 2 server in august and 2 in november, could it be first 2 servers have an early version of p2 and things are changed after that time in the stats. Because all the file sizes are different compaped to newest servers. ISC did not release two different versions with identical filename nor version numbering. Again make sure you are really talking to the correct named. Maybe you have a rndc.conf file. ___ bind-users mailing list bind-users@lists.isc.org https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
RE: rndc stats - 9.5.0-p2
I checked and there isnt any rndc.conf... /var/named # /var/named #find / -name rndc.conf /var/named # /var/named # /var/named # And which named points to /usr/local/sbin/named (there isnt any other named either) and rndc stats dumps stats as follows 4:00pm up 435 day(s), 3:14, 0 users, load average: 0.01, 0.02, 0.02 +++ Statistics Dump +++ (1234965975) success 277866617 referral 163684 nxrrset 111597721 nxdomain 17996313 recursion 191169 failure 41001785 --- Statistics Dump --- (1234965975) ~ -Original Message- From: Jeremy C. Reed [mailto:jeremy_r...@isc.org] Sent: Wednesday, February 18, 2009 3:51 PM To: Cihan Subasi (Garanti Teknoloji) Cc: bind-users@lists.isc.org Subject: RE: rndc stats - 9.5.0-p2 On Wed, 18 Feb 2009, Cihan Subasi (Garanti Teknoloji) wrote: As you see below the files are dated 15 august, we upgraded our 2 server in august and 2 in november, could it be first 2 servers have an early version of p2 and things are changed after that time in the stats. Because all the file sizes are different compaped to newest servers. ISC did not release two different versions with identical filename nor version numbering. Again make sure you are really talking to the correct named. Maybe you have a rndc.conf file. ___ bind-users mailing list bind-users@lists.isc.org https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
RE: rndc stats - 9.5.0-p2
#/usr/local/sbin/named -v BIND 9.5.0-P2 /var/named #which named /usr/local/sbin/named /var/named #which rndc /usr/local/sbin/rndc /var/named -Original Message- From: Jeremy C. Reed [mailto:jeremy_r...@isc.org] Sent: Wednesday, February 18, 2009 3:51 PM To: Cihan Subasi (Garanti Teknoloji) Cc: bind-users@lists.isc.org Subject: RE: rndc stats - 9.5.0-p2 On Wed, 18 Feb 2009, Cihan Subasi (Garanti Teknoloji) wrote: As you see below the files are dated 15 august, we upgraded our 2 server in august and 2 in november, could it be first 2 servers have an early version of p2 and things are changed after that time in the stats. Because all the file sizes are different compaped to newest servers. ISC did not release two different versions with identical filename nor version numbering. Again make sure you are really talking to the correct named. Maybe you have a rndc.conf file. ___ bind-users mailing list bind-users@lists.isc.org https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
RE: rndc stats - 9.5.0-p2
Maybe you need to fully stop the process and restart it. (Maybe old named is still running even though you replaced the binary.) ___ bind-users mailing list bind-users@lists.isc.org https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
rndc stats - 9.5.0-p2
Hi, When I run rndc stats on two different servers with 9.5.0-p2, I am getting two different dumps of stats, one of them dumps the stats in very short format (7 lines), the other dumps it in very long format (50-60lines per dump)..What could be the difference on both? thank you SHORT +++ Statistics Dump +++ (1234821660) success 276836710 referral 161176 nxrrset 87427 nxdomain 17918582 recursion 190395 failure 40629328 LONG +++ Statistics Dump +++ (1234524979) ++ Incoming Requests ++ 12807 QUERY ++ Incoming Queries ++ 8373 A 96 NS 370 SOA 495 PTR 2420 MX 621 144 SRV 288 ANY ++ Outgoing Queries ++ ++ Name Server Statistics ++ 12807 IPv4 requests received 1 requests with EDNS(0) received 12597 responses sent 1 responses with EDNS(0) sent 2052 queries resulted in successful answer 638 queries resulted in authoritative answer 1861 queries resulted in non authoritative answer 1 queries resulted in referral answer 53 queries resulted in nxrrset 10098 queries resulted in SERVFAIL 393 queries resulted in NXDOMAIN 11649 queries caused recursion 186 duplicate queries received 4 queries dropped ++ Zone Maintenance Statistics ++ ++ Resolver Statistics ++ [Common] 72 mismatch responses received ++ Cache DB RRsets ++ [View: default] 3313 A 1855 NS 37 CNAME 12 PTR 550 MX 141 43 RRSIG 23 NSEC 6 !A 27 !MX 1 ! 176 NXDOMAIN [View: _bind] inline: logo.gif___ bind-users mailing list bind-users@lists.isc.org https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
Re: rndc stats - 9.5.0-p2
On Feb 17 2009, Cihan Subasi (Garanti Teknoloji) wrote: When I run rndc stats on two different servers with 9.5.0-p2, I am getting two different dumps of stats, one of them dumps the stats in very short format (7 lines), the other dumps it in very long format (50-60lines per dump)..What could be the difference on both? thank you Are you *sure* they are both running BIND 9.5.0-P2 ? Much the most likely explanation is that the one producing short statistics is a pre 9.5 version. I don't believe that BIND 9.5.x even includes any code to generate the old format. -- Chris Thompson Email: c...@cam.ac.uk ___ bind-users mailing list bind-users@lists.isc.org https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
RE: rndc stats - 9.5.0-p2
I think you're rigth, when I check the file sizes they are not same but versions are matching... short -- #ls -la total 48166 drwxr-xr-x 2 root other512 Aug 15 2008 . drwxr-xr-x 13 root other512 Nov 21 14:02 .. -rwxr-xr-x 1 root other1199932 Aug 15 2008 dnssec-keygen -rwxr-xr-x 1 root other3675504 Aug 15 2008 dnssec-signzone -rwxr-xr-x 2 root other5134128 Aug 15 2008 lwresd -rwxr-xr-x 2 root other5134128 Aug 15 2008 named -rwxr-xr-x 1 root other3816336 Aug 15 2008 named-checkconf -rwxr-xr-x 1 root other3624412 Aug 15 2008 named-checkzone lrwxrwxrwx 1 root other 15 Aug 15 2008 named-compilezone - named-checkzone -rwxr-xr-x 1 root other 847676 Aug 15 2008 rndc -rwxr-xr-x 1 root other1136800 Aug 15 2008 rndc-confgen /usr/local/sbin #named -v BIND 9.5.0-P2 /usr/local/sbin long-- [garanti2]/usr/local/sbinls -la total 158646 drwxr-xr-x 2 bin bin 512 Nov 26 17:10 . drwxr-xr-x 15 root other512 Nov 26 17:01 .. -rwxr-xr-x 1 root other3318808 Nov 26 17:10 dnssec-keygen -rwxr-xr-x 1 bin bin 5182984 Mar 25 2004 dnssec-makekeyset -rwxr-xr-x 1 bin bin 5184180 Mar 25 2004 dnssec-signkey -rwxr-xr-x 1 root other9997148 Nov 26 17:10 dnssec-signzone -rwxr-xr-x 2 root other15535428 Nov 26 17:10 lwresd -rwxr-xr-x 2 root other15535428 Nov 26 17:10 named -rwxr-xr-x 1 root other10443912 Nov 26 17:10 named-checkconf -rwxr-xr-x 1 root other9923952 Nov 26 17:10 named-checkzone lrwxrwxrwx 1 root other 15 Nov 26 17:10 named-compilezone - named-checkzone -rwxr-xr-x 1 root other2917848 Nov 26 17:10 rndc -rwxr-xr-x 1 root other3061584 Nov 26 17:10 rndc-confgen [garanti2]/usr/local/sbinnamed -v BIND 9.5.0-P2 -Original Message- From: Chris Thompson [mailto:c...@hermes.cam.ac.uk] On Behalf Of Chris Thompson Sent: Tuesday, February 17, 2009 2:40 PM To: Cihan Subasi (Garanti Teknoloji) Cc: Bind Users Mailing List Subject: Re: rndc stats - 9.5.0-p2 On Feb 17 2009, Cihan Subasi (Garanti Teknoloji) wrote: When I run rndc stats on two different servers with 9.5.0-p2, I am getting two different dumps of stats, one of them dumps the stats in very short format (7 lines), the other dumps it in very long format (50-60lines per dump)..What could be the difference on both? thank you Are you *sure* they are both running BIND 9.5.0-P2 ? Much the most likely explanation is that the one producing short statistics is a pre 9.5 version. I don't believe that BIND 9.5.x even includes any code to generate the old format. -- Chris Thompson Email: c...@cam.ac.uk ___ bind-users mailing list bind-users@lists.isc.org https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
RE: rndc stats - 9.5.0-p2
There may be more than one named binary in your path. You may want to do an explicit reference to check the version (./named -V) or do a which named Matthew Huff | One Manhattanville Rd OTA Management LLC | Purchase, NY 10577 http://www.ox.com | Phone: 914-460-4039 aim: matthewbhuff | Fax: 914-460-4139 -Original Message- From: bind-users-boun...@lists.isc.org [mailto:bind-users- boun...@lists.isc.org] On Behalf Of Cihan Subasi (Garanti Teknoloji) Sent: Tuesday, February 17, 2009 7:51 AM To: bind-users@lists.isc.org Cc: c...@hermes.cam.ac.uk Subject: RE: rndc stats - 9.5.0-p2 I think you're rigth, when I check the file sizes they are not same but versions are matching... short -- #ls -la total 48166 drwxr-xr-x 2 root other512 Aug 15 2008 . drwxr-xr-x 13 root other512 Nov 21 14:02 .. -rwxr-xr-x 1 root other1199932 Aug 15 2008 dnssec-keygen -rwxr-xr-x 1 root other3675504 Aug 15 2008 dnssec-signzone -rwxr-xr-x 2 root other5134128 Aug 15 2008 lwresd -rwxr-xr-x 2 root other5134128 Aug 15 2008 named -rwxr-xr-x 1 root other3816336 Aug 15 2008 named-checkconf -rwxr-xr-x 1 root other3624412 Aug 15 2008 named-checkzone lrwxrwxrwx 1 root other 15 Aug 15 2008 named-compilezone - named-checkzone -rwxr-xr-x 1 root other 847676 Aug 15 2008 rndc -rwxr-xr-x 1 root other1136800 Aug 15 2008 rndc-confgen /usr/local/sbin #named -v BIND 9.5.0-P2 /usr/local/sbin long-- [garanti2]/usr/local/sbinls -la total 158646 drwxr-xr-x 2 bin bin 512 Nov 26 17:10 . drwxr-xr-x 15 root other512 Nov 26 17:01 .. -rwxr-xr-x 1 root other3318808 Nov 26 17:10 dnssec-keygen -rwxr-xr-x 1 bin bin 5182984 Mar 25 2004 dnssec-makekeyset -rwxr-xr-x 1 bin bin 5184180 Mar 25 2004 dnssec-signkey -rwxr-xr-x 1 root other9997148 Nov 26 17:10 dnssec-signzone -rwxr-xr-x 2 root other15535428 Nov 26 17:10 lwresd -rwxr-xr-x 2 root other15535428 Nov 26 17:10 named -rwxr-xr-x 1 root other10443912 Nov 26 17:10 named-checkconf -rwxr-xr-x 1 root other9923952 Nov 26 17:10 named-checkzone lrwxrwxrwx 1 root other 15 Nov 26 17:10 named-compilezone - named-checkzone -rwxr-xr-x 1 root other2917848 Nov 26 17:10 rndc -rwxr-xr-x 1 root other3061584 Nov 26 17:10 rndc-confgen [garanti2]/usr/local/sbinnamed -v BIND 9.5.0-P2 -Original Message- From: Chris Thompson [mailto:c...@hermes.cam.ac.uk] On Behalf Of Chris Thompson Sent: Tuesday, February 17, 2009 2:40 PM To: Cihan Subasi (Garanti Teknoloji) Cc: Bind Users Mailing List Subject: Re: rndc stats - 9.5.0-p2 On Feb 17 2009, Cihan Subasi (Garanti Teknoloji) wrote: When I run rndc stats on two different servers with 9.5.0-p2, I am getting two different dumps of stats, one of them dumps the stats in very short format (7 lines), the other dumps it in very long format (50-60lines per dump)..What could be the difference on both? thank you Are you *sure* they are both running BIND 9.5.0-P2 ? Much the most likely explanation is that the one producing short statistics is a pre 9.5 version. I don't believe that BIND 9.5.x even includes any code to generate the old format. -- Chris Thompson Email: c...@cam.ac.uk ___ bind-users mailing list bind-users@lists.isc.org https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users Matthew Huff.vcf Description: Binary data smime.p7s Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature ___ bind-users mailing list bind-users@lists.isc.org https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
