Re: bbkeys 0.3.6 released

2001-03-14 Thread Jon Pennington

On Wed, Mar 14, 2001 at 11:45:35PM -0500, Jason vanRijn Kasper wrote:

>   So. It's been a while. =:) bbkeys 0.3.6 is hereby released into the wild,
> may
>   God have mercy on us. Thanks to several patches and ideas sent in from

Um, okay, but I'll bet it doesn't include shaleh's Xcutbuffer patch, now, does it?

-- 
-=|JP|=-"This space intentionally left blank."
Jon Pennington  | Debian 2.4 -o)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | Auto Enthusiast/\\
Kansas City, MO, USA| Proud Husband and Father  _\_V



bbkeys 0.3.6 released

2001-03-14 Thread Jason vanRijn Kasper

  So. It's been a while. =:) bbkeys 0.3.6 is hereby released into the wild,
may
  God have mercy on us. Thanks to several patches and ideas sent in from
  my little user community (look, Ma, I've got users!!), bbkeys now sports
  several new really neato features, such as window moving and resizing via
  keystroke navigation. Also, I've reworked the methodology behind the
  whole configuration launch thingey (Kyle, you were -> <- this close), and
  I've reworked the very simple "just to get you started with bbkeys
  configuration" C program, bbkeysConfigC, that gets launched in an xterm
or
  rxvt to be a little bit more useful and much more informative. (Can you
say
  DISCLAIMER, anyone?) 

  Also in this release is an updated bbkeysconf package (available in rpm,
  deb, lemon-lime, and tooty-fruity flavors) that allows configuration of
these
  new and improved bbkeys features. Trek on over to
http://movingparts.net/bbkeys.shtml
  to download your choice of rpm, deb, or source-ball. As always, please
let 
  me know of any problems or  issues you may have with this fine, quality
product =:)


-- 
¤º°`°º¤ø,¸¸,ø¤º°`°º¤ø,¸¸,ø¤º°`°º¤
Jason Kasper (vanRijn)
Systems Engineer
bash$ :(){ :|:&};:
VORFA



bblaunch

2001-03-14 Thread Scott J Garner

New version of bblaunch for those interested:

http://2bit.dhs.org/files/bblaunch/bblaunch-20010314a.tar.gz


I think I have most of the bugs squashed and am about ready for
version 0.0.1.  If you find any brokenness, please let me know.

Thanks,

Scott



Re: Xinerama

2001-03-14 Thread Scott J Garner

I gave it a shot a few days ago and the main issue I had was that of
the toolbar being about 6,000 miles long when using LeftOf or RightOf
in the ServerLayout.  Expect a possible update to blackbox with Xinerama
support in the comming weeks/months/

On Wed, Mar 14, 2001 at 10:02:14PM +0100, Mattias Ekl?f wrote:
> Has anyone here run Blackbox making use of the X Xinerama extension? I'm
> a little interested in trying this out, and would like to here if
> someone's had experience with it. I suppose Blackbox isn't especially
> Xinerama aware, judging from the Xinerama-HOWTO, so I'm foremostly
> intersted in knowing if there could be any other complications than the
> common ones mentioned in the howto. (The windowmanager placeing windows
> in "dead" spaces, maximizing a window maximizes over both screens, etc.)
> 
> Mattias
> 



Xinerama

2001-03-14 Thread Mattias Eklöf

Has anyone here run Blackbox making use of the X Xinerama extension? I'm
a little interested in trying this out, and would like to here if
someone's had experience with it. I suppose Blackbox isn't especially
Xinerama aware, judging from the Xinerama-HOWTO, so I'm foremostly
intersted in knowing if there could be any other complications than the
common ones mentioned in the howto. (The windowmanager placeing windows
in "dead" spaces, maximizing a window maximizes over both screens, etc.)

Mattias



FREE Biotech Stock Info! 567

2001-03-14 Thread biotechstox50
Title: Do you want to capitalize on the Biotech Revolution







Do
you want to capitalize on the Biotech Revolution? Would you like to add
groundbreaking biotech, pharmaceutical and medical device companies to your
portfolio mix? Does hearing about exciting IPO and private placement offerings
from life sciences companies interest you?
The
exclusive Ruddy-Carlisle Biotech Infoline service keeps you abreast of
investment opportunities in the life sciences space. Just sign up for it once
and get important information instantly delivered to study at your leisure. Our
service is 100% FREE! Sign
up!
Ruddy-Carlisle
Biotech Infoline:

  Instantly
delivers key life sciences investment information directly to you! 

  
  Learn
about biotech, pharmaceutical & medical device investment opportunities
before others! 

  
  Includes
IPO & private placement information! 

  
  100%
FREE!

For
the entire last decade there were only three profitable biotech companies. At
the end of this year, ten are projected. At the end of 2003, over forty
are projected! The genomic promise is about to be delivered and investors know
it. The Ruddy-Carlisle Biotech Infoline provides you with critical,
decision-making, information that aids the chance of investment success in this
lucrative space. Sign
up!
Please
Note- Your information will only be
shared with companies that are in the life sciences space and pass our
rigorous inspection. Only the best opportunities will come to you.
Ruddy-Carlisle respects your privacy. Sign
up!
 
 


List Removal Instructions- Simply click here: remove
to be instantly and permanently removed from our list. Send the blank email to
the address specified. Please do not try to reply to this message.






Re: Another Open Letter

2001-03-14 Thread Kyle Donaldson

Well, since it looks like no one actually cares what I have to say, and the
ones that read it seem to just want to shoot me down, I just have to ask
Why does any one here care? I mean, if it's that bad, we can deal with it
when the time comes.

(Thanks for insulting me after I tried to make a point)



Re: Finished

2001-03-14 Thread Kevin Oleksy

Jonathan Gift wrote:

> Let me spell it out for those people with the problem. I use BB because
> it is lean, fast, and stable. I do not like clutter. I do not like Gnome
> or KDE for that matter. I use Vim, Gkrellm and several open consoles.

But if you dislike gnome and KDE (as I'm sure many of us do) then why do
you want support?  Gnome apps run fine under BB, just get your gtk set
up corectly.  There's no need to support gnome directly.  Its apps run
faster this way anyway.  That old hack for gnome support just slows
things down.

just thought I'd toss this in because I hadn't seen it yet.
-- 
+---+
| Kevin C. Oleksy| "Come not between| 
| [EMAIL PROTECTED]  | the dragon and his   |
| www.heli0s.com | wrath."  --King Lear | 
|+--|
|   Powered by Linux 2.4 www.linuxhq.com|
+---+