Re: xorg-libs & libxcb dependency

2009-10-25 Thread DJ Lucas
On 10/25/2009 05:39 PM, Matthew Burgess wrote:
> Hi,
>
> As noted on the xorg-libs page, libxcb is used by default and
> a switch is required to disable building against it.
>
> As such, should the dependency not be listed under 'Recommended'
> rather than 'Optional'?  The default use of libxcb would suggest
> that upstream expect/prefer it to be available?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Matt.
>
You might want to let it be for a bit or check out 7.5-RC1.  Build order 
will be unchanged.  I was kind of letting the xorg section hang for a 
just a bit as the update to 7.5 will be official any day nowAFAIK, 
we're just waiting on a final release of xf86-input-joystick (and maybe 
a couple of minor updates to other modules if the RC has any issues, but 
there are none that I can see on my current build).  When I commit, I'll 
make the recommendation in the book.

Thanks.

-- DJ Lucas


-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content, and is believed to be clean.

-- 
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page


Re: xorg lib md5 file error

2009-10-25 Thread Bruce Dubbs
Matthew Burgess wrote:
> Hi DJ,
> 
> Looks like http://anduin.linuxfromscratch.org/files/BLFS/svn/xorg/lib-7.4.md5
> contains an entry for an index.html file that doesn't exist/isn't required.
> 
> This leads 'md5sum -c ../lib-7.4.md5' failing.  Any chance you could just
> remove that top entry please?

This is updated automatically from BLFS/trunk/auxfiles/xorg/

I committed the change.  anduin will update overnight.

   -- Bruce
-- 
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page


xorg-libs & libxcb dependency

2009-10-25 Thread Matthew Burgess
Hi,

As noted on the xorg-libs page, libxcb is used by default and
a switch is required to disable building against it.

As such, should the dependency not be listed under 'Recommended'
rather than 'Optional'?  The default use of libxcb would suggest
that upstream expect/prefer it to be available?

Thanks,

Matt.

-- 
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page


xorg lib md5 file error

2009-10-25 Thread Matthew Burgess
Hi DJ,

Looks like http://anduin.linuxfromscratch.org/files/BLFS/svn/xorg/lib-7.4.md5
contains an entry for an index.html file that doesn't exist/isn't required.

This leads 'md5sum -c ../lib-7.4.md5' failing.  Any chance you could just
remove that top entry please?

Thanks,

Matt.

-- 
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page


Re: Gnome-2.28.0 build notes

2009-10-25 Thread Wayne Blaszczyk
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

DJ Lucas wrote:

> 4. gir-repository will need to have LFLAGS defined if gconf is not
> installed into /usr
> 'make LFAGS="$GNOME_PREFIX/lib" {,install}' (by default)
> Also, it is throwing error on VTE (with new version) and not exiting on
> error..but I didn't look into it.
> 
> 5. libunique tried to check it's own pc file before it was installed
> during the installation which results in a bunch of missing headers and
> resulting syntax error messages, but the installation exits with a zero
> status...I lazily installed it twice and all seems happy.
> 
>   LINK  libunique-1.0.la
> Package unique-1.0 was not found in the pkg-config search path.
> Perhaps you should add the directory containing `unique-1.0.pc'
> to the PKG_CONFIG_PATH environment variable
> No package 'unique-1.0' found
> Package unique-1.0 was not found in the pkg-config search path.
> Perhaps you should add the directory containing `unique-1.0.pc'
> to the PKG_CONFIG_PATH environment variable
> No package 'unique-1.0' found
> In file included from :4:
> /sources/libunique-1.1.2/unique/uniqueapp.h:25:25: error: glib-object.h:
> No such file or directory
> In file included from /sources/libunique-1.1.2/unique/uniqueapp.h:26,
>  from :4:
No sure if this is the same problem I saw during my build, but if it is,
it's to do with gir-repository being built before libunique (same thing
for vte).
I also found that if gobject-introspection is installed before building
libunique, then gir-repository will be a requirement for libunique and
on top of that, gtk2 needs to be built before gir-repository.
The gir-repository page needs to have its optional dependencies updated
(Ticket 2971).
Now that 2.28.1 is in, feel free to update whatever page is necessary
with your fixes. At some stage I'll take another look gdm and see if the
sym links cannot be removed with an alternative patch fix.
Speaking of which, I've got a new problem with gdm. After a reboot, the
login button is missing. Doing a  to restart gdm, brings
back the login button.
Wayne.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFK5LtZhfgHoRhX2wIRAldlAJ9HqeV3vlEN/dbutKg2tVcl1jFtxwCbBJCg
7EMsRsb9mQybGLszovLP9mk=
=UiZo
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
-- 
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page


Re: Harcoded dirs in the GDM bootscript

2009-10-25 Thread Bruce Dubbs
William Immendorf wrote:
> Basicaly, I looked at the GDM bootscript, and it's hardcoded to
> 2.18.3. If you ask me, it should be updated to match the latest
> version, or better yet, point to /opt/gnome, which is a good idea. In
> theory, anyway.

/opt/gnome is one way, but not everyone uses the /opt/gnome symlink.

An alternative method would be to have the script load /etc/sysconfig/gnome or 
similar file with current boot time parameters such as GNOME_PREFIX.  A similar 
approach is nfs-utils which uses a sysconfig file.

   -- Bruce

-- 
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page


Harcoded dirs in the GDM bootscript

2009-10-25 Thread William Immendorf
Basicaly, I looked at the GDM bootscript, and it's hardcoded to
2.18.3. If you ask me, it should be updated to match the latest
version, or better yet, point to /opt/gnome, which is a good idea. In
theory, anyway.

-- 
William Immendorf
The ultimate in free computing.

--

"Every nonfree program has a lord, a master --
and if you use the program, he is your master."  Richard Stallman
-- 
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page