Re: OpenOffice 1.9 - beta late than never
Bruce Dubbs wrote: DJ Lucas wrote: real725m59.836s user559m34.396s sys 53m8.695s [EMAIL PROTECTED] src680-m108]# WOW! Finally got it in a single pass. Great! BTW, what is your binutils time? -- Bruce Actually I don't have one for the bleeding edge systemneed to acquire it, but from my stable partition: [EMAIL PROTECTED] OpenOffice-1.99-m108]# cat /media/lfs/etc/SBU 265 Seconds [EMAIL PROTECTED] OpenOffice-1.99-m108]# Anyway, I think this is beyond dev time now. It's figured out now and should be only minor work (hopefully) to get it into shape come release. -- DJ Lucas -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Re: OpenOffice 1.9 - beta late than never
Bruce Dubbs wrote: Wow. 164+ SBU? I think that sets the record. It may be more than all of the rest of BLFS combined. LOL, yes I do believe it takes the cake. I think it might be time to point to make a big note about rpm2tgz with cpio as a dep and we'll cover the binary install fist when it's released. :-) I'll do a time trial on binutils with this setup...could be different, but I doubt much. Here are a few more fun facts: [EMAIL PROTECTED] opt]# du -sh /opt/OpenOffice-1.99-m108/ 272M/opt/OpenOffice-1.99-m108/ [EMAIL PROTECTED] opt]# du -sh /opt/openoffice-1.1.4/ 208M/opt/openoffice-1.1.4/ [EMAIL PROTECTED] opt]# du -sh /home/dj/OOo/src680-m108/ 8.1G/home/dj/OOo/src680-m108/ [EMAIL PROTECTED] opt]# du -sh /media/lfs/usr/src/OOo-build/ 2.6G/media/lfs/usr/src/OOo-build/ [EMAIL PROTECTED] opt]# The build tree is now 3+ times the size as it was done now, but the final result is only about a fifth larger. The binfilters takes, at a guess, about 2.5 hours of that 12. Docu is lacking ATM about each tarball though, at least I haven't found it. I'll have to see how a build without turns out...not to mention system python, db, mozilla, and neon. I'm real weary of system python and db, but mozzy should cut that time a good deal too. -- DJ -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Re: OpenOffice 1.9 - beta late than never
Kevin M. Jordan wrote: Here's my configure flags: ./configure --with-x --prefix=/opt/OpenOffice-2.0-m107 --enable-libart --enable-libsn --enable-epm --disable-fontooo --with-system-mozilla --without-fonts --with-system-stdlibs --with-system-freetype --with-system-zlib --with-system-jpeg --with-system-expat --with-system-libxml --with-system-curl --with-system-nas --with-system-sndfile --with-build-version=BLFS-20050607 --with-java --with-jdk-home=/opt/jdk/jdk --with-system-odbc-headers --with-package-format=native Are this realy the only thing you have to do? NO patches ?? If it is this easy I will try to compile it too. Stef Bon -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Re: OpenOffice 1.9 - beta late than never
On 6/8/05, Kevin M. Jordan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Alright, I've gotten this stuff finally installed. Here's my configure flags: ./configure --with-x --prefix=/opt/OpenOffice-2.0-m107 --enable-libart --enable-libsn --enable-epm --disable-fontooo --with-system-mozilla --without-fonts --with-system-stdlibs --with-system-freetype --with-system-zlib --with-system-jpeg --with-system-expat --with-system-libxml --with-system-curl --with-system-nas --with-system-sndfile --with-build-version=BLFS-20050607 --with-java --with-jdk-home=/opt/jdk/jdk --with-system-odbc-headers --with-package-format=native Yay! No more patches to use the system installed versions of various packages! -- Tushar Teredesai http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/~tushar/ http://www.geocities.com/tushar/ -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Re: OpenOffice 1.9 - beta late than never
Tushar Teredesai wrote: On 6/8/05, Kevin M. Jordan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Alright, I've gotten this stuff finally installed. Here's my configure flags: ./configure --with-x --prefix=/opt/OpenOffice-2.0-m107 --enable-libart --enable-libsn --enable-epm --disable-fontooo --with-system-mozilla --without-fonts --with-system-stdlibs --with-system-freetype --with-system-zlib --with-system-jpeg --with-system-expat --with-system-libxml --with-system-curl --with-system-nas --with-system-sndfile --with-build-version=BLFS-20050607 --with-java --with-jdk-home=/opt/jdk/jdk --with-system-odbc-headers --with-package-format=native Yes correct. Thanks. A couple of trivial changes: prefix is not necessary and --with-java/path are not necessary if JAVA_HOME is set correctly. Not positive about the other --with-system-*, but I believe they are required. I'll get to it. Finally, Mozilla is required...the build is currently broken without. You can do the build intree fine. Thunderbird libs/headers will not cut it! Mabye Firefox and OpenLDAP will work if you specify OpenLDAP for ldap.h. I'm trying to figure out what change was that caused it because thunderbird worked fine with m92 and a couple of changes to configure. I also want to eliminate the libmawt symlink with the proper link flag, but I've got to find where it was needed now. My last full build till next snapshot is going now. Yay! No more patches to use the system installed versions of various packages! Actually, libxml2 only doesn't if we want to create a symlink...I did an intree patch to avoid the symlink. :-) I guess it's a matter of personal taste, but I didn't like adding symlinks for already installed packages. I don't like the way I did the patch either...a mad ForInDo grepNsed done in haste as opposed to changing the include path...will fix it later as it'll work as is. Anyway, latest patchset and my current instructions will be availible at /~dj/OOo-2.0-pre/ in just a few minutes. I choose not to use --with-system-db, --with-system-odbc-headers, and --with-system-python because of past versioning issues (fortunately not specific to the mamoth sized build of OOo). -- DJ Lucas -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Re: OpenOffice 1.9 - beta late than never
--with-system-db won't work unless you have a 4.2.x series installed. I didn't have a problem with system-odbc, and I think system-python may work, although I had removed it because I thought I there was a problem with it, but it was just the packaging types I had tried previously to native that I think was messing it up. It was something with uno.py not being found (which is in the OO source tree) during packaging. -- Kevin Jordan [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Re: OpenOffice 1.9 - beta late than never
Kevin M. Jordan wrote: Snip I'm far from finished with this yet. Still working on the prelim patchset, but the problem was that I forgot to adjust the lst file. Also, if you build without mozilla, the installer won't get built...I think...I'm still carefully beating it into shape, but easier just to skip the no-moz patch, and drop the mozilla tarball into the build tree and add --enable-build-mozilla to the configure line. I'm on my third build now, so I've also added RPM and dropped -disable-epm for right now so I don't have to deal with the installer for the moment...it'll come soon enough though. Here is the fix for bsh from the post directly above this one in the thread. Oops. I forgot to adjust the project list. If anybody is following along with this, Need to add to it just a bit. To save you a complete rebuild: rm -rf beanshell/unxlngi6.pro and then sed -i 's/0b1/0b4/' beanshell/prj/d.lst The breakage is viewed as 'non-fatal' I guess. :-/ It tries to copy bsh-2.0b1.jar instead of bsh-2.0b4.jar into the solver tree. Of course this file does not exist, but the build continues along hapily anyway. I suppose instead of rebuilding you can just copy the jar file into the solver lib tree, but beanshell takes a whoping 1 minute to build here. Oh and more changes. Bash is just fine now. The tcsh dep should be removed at some point upstream, but configure still checks for it right now. Just use 'source LinuxIntelEnv.Set.sh dmake' from the command line to have dmake directly availible to you. -- DJ Lucas -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Re: OpenOffice 1.9 - beta late than never
DJ Lucas wrote: More to come as is noted above, JDK-1.5 is not officially supported. And rhino needs a patch. Obtained the change from upstream mozilla. http://lxr.mozilla.org/mozilla/source/js/rhino/toolsrc/org/mozilla/javascript/tools/shell/JavaPolicySecurity.java Also, will need to add Archive::Zip to Perl Modules page. http://www.cpan.org/authors/id/N/NE/NEDKONZ/Archive-Zip-1.14.tar.gz -- DJ Lucas -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Re: OpenOffice 1.9 - beta late than never
DJ Lucas wrote: More to come as is noted above, JDK-1.5 is not officially supported. Uggh, completely unrelated to JDK-1.5 (I think). Does this look familiar? ../unxlngi6.pro/slo/process.o: In function `ChildStatusProc': /home/matthew/src680-m107/sal/osl/unx/process.c:539: undefined reference to `pthread_kill_other_threads_np' collect2: ld returned 1 exit status Cheers, Matt. -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Re: OpenOffice 1.9 - beta late than never
Matthew Burgess wrote: DJ Lucas wrote: More to come as is noted above, JDK-1.5 is not officially supported. Uggh, completely unrelated to JDK-1.5 (I think). Does this look familiar? ../unxlngi6.pro/slo/process.o: In function `ChildStatusProc': /home/matthew/src680-m107/sal/osl/unx/process.c:539: undefined reference to `pthread_kill_other_threads_np' collect2: ld returned 1 exit status Cheers, Matt. Yep yep. :-) Actually does anybody know a quick PP check for NPTL. This bug has been there for since 1.1.2 was current with NPTL. It should be wrapped it in a #ifndef SOME_NPTL_ONLY_DEFINE and fixed upstream. I took a look at pthread.h and features.h and with my limited comprehension, nothing obvious stood out. -- DJ Lucas -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Re: OpenOffice 1.9 - beta late than never
DJ Lucas wrote: DJ Lucas wrote: Moving to dev as this will undoubtedly carry over to 2.0. JDK-1.5 will not be officially supported untill 2.0.1 according to this bug report: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=48187 Give me a couple of days and I'll try to put together a current patchset against raw m104 for us as I was going to start on it this weekend anyway. And...first patch on the list and updated tarball is for Beanshell WRT JDK-1.5 issues: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/~dj/OOo-2.0-pre/ Copy the bsh tarball to $BUILD/src680-m1??/beanshell/download/ and then apply the patch. More to come as is noted above, JDK-1.5 is not officially supported. -- DJ Lucas Oops. I forgot to adjust the project list. If anybody is following along with this, Need to add to it just a bit. To save you a complete rebuild: rm -rf beanshell/unxlngi6.pro and then sed -i 's/0b1/0b4/' beanshell/prj/d.lst -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
